Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Falcons at Packers Recap: How Lambeau Was Won Bar-right-arrows



Colts Defense: Under the Microscope

Some of you have been a bit critical of me giving the defense so much slack this season, and that's fine. If I wasn't cool with criticism I wouldn't blog. I kind of comes with the territory. The reason I've given them slack is mainly do to the injuries they've sustained. I know it's been repeated a lot, but when a team loses both its starting DTs for the season for reasons that aren't football related, it will affect your team's performance. Fans and the media don't like hearing things like that though. It's perferred to blame someone: Dungy, Meeks, Gardner, Manning (he gets blamed for everything so why not throw him in there), etc.

It's easy to find scape goats. Look at Dallas. Apparently, Drew Bledsoe was the sole reason the Cowboys started the season so poorly. Had Romo been in there, this team would be undefeated, right?

Wrong.

The biggest reason for Dallas' turnaround is their defense, which finally showed up to play. Tony Romo has not played well against good/average defenses. Against the NY Giants, he was downright aweful (3 TOs, no TDs). However, their defesne kept them in the game, not allowing the Giants to score TDs themselves. This gave Dallas's offense the luxury to suck for 3 quarters, only to pull together  a game-winning FG drive at the end. This is what a good defense can do for a team, it's because of this that Tony Dungy is so worried about his:

A porous defense affects the offense. Quarterback Peyton Manning directed only nine possessions against the Titans, just three in the second half. The defense isn't giving the offense an opportunity to occasionally fail, which magnifies every dropped pass, every penalty, every stalled drive.

Asked if he would tell his players things are not as bad as they seem after Sunday's loss, Dungy replied: "No, it's as bad as it seems. Yes, it is. And what we've got to do is do what it takes to get it back.

"You can't say, 'Aw, everything's fine,' because everything isn't fine."
It's for this reason everyone is writing off the Colts for the post-season. Traditionally, when the offense has not been "perfect" in the playoffs, the defense has not stepped it up. The Pittsburgh game was a prime example. The score was 14-0, and the game plan was out the window, before the second quarter started. The playoffs are not the regular season, folks. It is rare you score over 30 in a playoff game. This is why they say "defense wins championships." Offense will sell tickets. It will bring in money (which is important for small market teams). It will get you to the playoffs and win your division (remember, you've got to get there first).

However, in the playoffs, defense is key.

Now, defense is not the only factor in the playoffs. Denver walked into the postseason in 2003 and 2004 with a top 5 defense both times, and the Colts blew them out both times. You have to be able to score at least 22-24 points to win in the playoffs, and that takes a good offense. So, offense in the post season is important as well, along with special teams.

This Sunday, I will look at the defense extra close and, if they perform at the same level they did against the Titans last Sunday, then I might have to sing a swan song for this season. As Colts fans, we know why the team is 10-2: Peyton Manning. He's the league MVP, moreso than Tomlinson. Without Tomlinson, the Chargers can still win 10 or 11 games. Without Manning, this Colts team, as it is now, wins 5 or 6 games. No question.

Such realities define a league MVP, and it's a reason why Manning is probably one of the best QBs ever.

Now, morons and general idiots (like Boomer Esiason on his morning radio barf fest) will say Manning's contract is what prevents the team from getting a good defense. Like all football jocks, Boomer didn't major in math and he should stick with talking about things he actually knows something about, like blonde male hair dye. Tom Brady is counting more against New England's cap this year than Manning does against the Colts, and Manning's contract is more cap friendly. Michael Vick makes more, and has a longer contract, than both those guys. The last three drafts, the Colts have invested heavily in defensive players (June, Sanders, David, Jennings, Doss, Jackson, etc.). They've signed defensive free agents like Corey Simon. They've traded for players like Booger McFarland. They've locked up players like Brock and Brackett. These are all excellent moves, but injuries have tested the limits of this organization's pool of talent.

Despite all this, I expect to see a better performance. Bill Polian essentially called out LBer Gilbert Gardner on his radio show this past Monday. Let's see if Gilbert responds. I personally still question why he is still starting. If he can't get it done after 12 weeks, he simply can't do it. Replace him.

I understand injuries have hurt this team, and I have given them slack. But injuries do not account for all the silly mistakes certain players have made. If this defense does not show me something against a very good Jacksonville team, playing the QB they always should have played (Gerrard), then the naysayers might indeed have a point. This team will go no where if the defense does not step up.

0 recs | Comment 7 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

wrong again BigBlue
the Cowboys defense hasn't been better at all. You obviously didn't watch the Giant game because the defense made Eli look good and let him drive down the field at the end of the game. That was simply awful. Cowboys defense is actually not playing as well because they lost their best defensive player for the season, Greg Ellis.

Romo played awesome in the 4th quarter against the Giants as he usually does and won the game with his perfect pass to Jason Witten with a minute to play. No qb in the league could have thrown that pass any better, including your boy. So you're assesment of Romo is simply wrong, he's played well against every defense he's faced, he just waited until the second half and 4th qrt, against Colts and Giants. His stats in the 4th qrt this year are absolutely sick, and thats where games are won and lost in this league. INT's in the 1st half mean nothing unless they result in points for the other team, which none of those did.

by Terry on Dec 8, 2006 11:59 AM EST   0 recs

I didn't know that romo played Defense too
Wow, I couldn't emagine to point out that we only scored 14 points that game. I guess romo was out there tipping passes, making tackles, and intercepting balls.

Romo didn't win s**t. The story of the game was 18 not putting up enough points for us to win. So, your defense is credited with the win. Romo is credited w/managing a good game.

Unless romo was out there making defensive plays, as stated earlier.

"GO HORSE!"

by beester on Dec 9, 2006 1:23 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

don't kid yourself
completing 10 out of 11 for 130 yds in the 2nd half is not managing the game, but making big time plays to win the game. The bottom line is that Romo made the plays and throws to win the game, while Manning as you pointed out didn't, its that simple.

There is simply no way the Colts can be beat by any qb who just simply "manages" the game, can't happen. The Colts have only 4 real losses over the last two years and in those games, Brees, Roethlisberger, Romo and Young all were playmakers and had to be to win the game.

by Terry on Dec 9, 2006 3:14 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Roethlisberger manages games
You've seen what happened when he actually tries to be a play making QB, this year.

You will get called out on your helmet wearing statements.

"GO HORSE!"

by beester on Dec 10, 2006 12:52 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

I'm no Roethilisberger fan
by any means, but he surely was a playmaker against you guys in the first half of last years playoff game. He's the reason the Steelers were so far ahead by the 4th qtr and that you needed a home cooking call on Polamala's INT in the 4th to get back in the game.

Ordinarily I would agree with you that Big Ben is nothing more that a game manager, but the reason they went to the SB last season was because he was a playmaker in the playoffs. If he wasn't, they would have never made it.

by Terry on Dec 10, 2006 4:46 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

good for him
but he probably played the worst game of his career up to that point in the Superbowl. His quarterback rating was below 30.

by Playoff Pride on Dec 10, 2006 9:54 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Oh I totally agree
that he sucked in the SB, they won that game in spite of his play. They were lucky Stevens was dropping all those passes.

by Terry on Dec 10, 2006 1:23 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

139_small
MVP of the quarter
Ind_small
The Colts Are 2-2, NOT Could-Be 0-4.

Recent FanPosts

Jupmpt_small
Wow just wow
Peyton_rocks_small
Wow. Peter King has something positive to say...
Bassonator_small
Thankful
Small
This is a copycat league....could the Colts run the wildcat?
Small
Dwight Freeney (not Brock) forced the big fumble and isn't getting the credit for it....
Lucas_oil_tour_aug_16_2008_034_small
Parity?
Img_0305_small
Ravens fluttering against the Wind to Indy
Questionmark_small
Anyone else getting worried about Ugoh?
Small
Dungy 10/6 Press Conference Recap

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter