Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Stop it, already

Stop it! STOP IT ALREADY!

For the love of God, can we all please get a grip on things?

For the last few days, the mind-numbing highlight zombies at ESPN have been playing over and over again Reggie Bush's 44 yard run in the Saints' pre-season game against the Titans. There's a key word in that sentence that I'd like to emphasize: pre-season.

They are showing his highlights from the friggin' pre-season. Somebody give me a barf bag.

To add insult to injury, if you listened to the AOL's Sports Bloggers Live show I was on, PFT's Mike Florio talked about how folks are already laughing at Houston for not taking Bush.

Why?

Because in Mario Williams' pre-season debut he managed just one assisted tackle. Forget the fact that Williams only played 11 plays, and was switched around from DE to DT. The ESPN media idiots only want to look at selective facts to draw their conclusions:

Reggie Bush preseason debut: 59 yards on 6 carries
Mario Williams preseason debut: 1 assisted tackle

Conclusion: Reggie Bush is Jesus in cleats, and Mario Williams is the biggest bust since Ryan Leaf.

If you watched PTI Monday, Dan Le Batard, the Miami Herald writer filling in for Tony Kornheiser (who was fine on MNF by the way), said Mario Williams better get used to the comparisons this early on.

My response to this: why?

Why is anyone comparing these guys? They play two different positions. They bring different things to the tackle. How the hell can they be compared fairly now when it's only the friggin' pre-season?

Simple, they can't. And those that do compare them at this stage are just mindless TV drones spewing useless crap to fill airtime.

Mario Williams doesn't have to listen to or deal with any Reggie Bush comparisons. Apparently, I'm one of the few people that thinks Houston passing on Bush and taking Williams was a good thing. Bush could be a great player. He could be a good or even a utility player. 59 yards in a pre-season game against the friggin' Titans (who have a horrible defense) does not foretell greatness.

I've watched many Houston Texans games because they play in the same division as the Colts. Houston has never beaten Indy, but for some reason they completely own the Jaguars. In every single Texans game I've watched, the weak link for this team has always been their putrid defense. They do not have a single playmaker in their entire defensive unit, save for Williams. He is the only player worth anything on that defense. In order to win in this league, a team absolutely must have a great defense. Teams like San Diego and KC have great, electric running backs. Both sat at home last year during the playoffs. Why? They have crappy defenses.

Houston saw a chance to draft someone that has the potential to be a great defensive lineman. Remember, New Orleans was going to take Williams themselves until Bush fell in their lap. That seems to suggest Williams is a good player. He has performed well at training camp, where the learning curve is not as easy as it is for a running back. Rookie running backs can come in immediately and contribute.

They take the ball and run. Pretty simple stuff.

If they are asked to do other things (block, play special teams, catch the ball) it takes a little longer. Defensive ends take much longer to develop. Look at Freeney. He didn't start his first game until the middle of his rookie year at Philadelphia.

The bottom line here is this: media outlets like ESPN aren't bashing Houston because they drafted a bust.

They're bashing Houston because they did not take the player that will make them more marketable.

Reggie Bush in Houston would have made lots of media people lots of money. Houston is a huge market. They have a brand new stadium. It's in Texas, which is Football, USA. It was a perfect fit.

Then, those pesky Houston Texans football people passed on Bush, who supposedly lied to their owner about his problems back at USC (according to PFT), for a defensive player not nearly as "electric" as Bush.

The Texans are a team that plays in the AFC South. If you want to have any chance to compete in the South, you must have a defense. Houston made the right choice for them. They are rebuilding with defense. Defense is boring to the numbskull reporting at ESPN. So, they bash Houston. Other markets pick up this line, and they bash Houston. Houston made the right call, and I think Williams will turn into a very good DE, maybe even a great one. Time will tell, and it is both unfair and idiotic to begin making judgment about him now.

Stop it, already.    

0 recs | Comment 7 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

I definitely agree
Unfortunately, the NFL must sells a product, thereby putting the emphasis on players and coaches who produce the best product.

When Mike Martz was in STL, he was hailed as an offensive genius.  This despite his idiotic time management skills in the playoffs and his (to me at least) aloof demeanor.  He produced what product the NFL wants- run up the scoreboard with huge, long yardage plays.  

by Chris on Aug 16, 2006 10:19 AM EDT   0 recs

That also bothered me
Mike Martz is a complete idiot as a coach. I know he produced great offenses in St. Louis. Sorry, but when you have Orlando Pace, Marshall Faulk, Issac Bruce, Torry Holt, and Kurt Warner you are supposed to score points.

The things you mentioned (time management, situational coaching, making adjustments, etc.) are all as important to an offense as scoring points, and Martz was terrible at all three.

So, for me personally, I don't think he was a good OC, and I feel he was a terrible HC.

Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Aug 16, 2006 10:31 AM EDT   0 recs

Unless Williams is the next L.T....
This will go down as the worst draft move ever.  If they didn't want Reggie Bush they should have traded down.  This pick will go down as one of the worst ever, even if Bush only has a mediocre career.

by Chad on Aug 17, 2006 2:58 PM EDT   0 recs

Why
Why does he have to be the next LT (who was a LBer, btw)?

You are assuming Bush is already a great back, which he isn't. He might be, or he might blow his knee out. You never know.

Obviously, Williams has to prove he can be a great player, but so does Bush. Running for 50-plus yards in a pre-season game proves nothing.

Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Aug 17, 2006 4:03 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I think you are missing my point...
I am saying that there is nothing wrong with the Texans not drafting Bush #1.  I am saying that they should have traded the pick.  They could have gotten a high pick and future #1s or such.  Or they should have drafted Bush and traded him.  I am saying that taking Williams will be a mistake.  Very few defensive players in the history of football would be worth a number 1 over all.  

Look back at each draft for 30 years and I can't seem to find a reason to justify any defensive player being #1 overall vs. the rest of the players available.  L.T. is the only guy that if we could redraft each year the would be a defensive #1.

by Chad on Aug 17, 2006 5:53 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Question
Why does the #1 overall pick have to be a QB or a RB? It seems every friggin' year it is one of those two. What is wrong with a team simply taking the player they want. If they had traded down, Williams would not have been there. New Orleans would have taken him.

And I can name a ton of defensive players who should have been drafted #1 overall over the other garbage that came before them. The draft is NOT an absolute science. Look at 2002. David Carr and Joey Harrington were both drafted ahead of Dwight Freeney. Julius Peppers was the #2 overall pick that year. Why didn't Houston take him? He's turned into more of an impact player than Carr.

In 2001, Atlanta took Michael Vick (who sucks) when they could have gotten Ricahrd Seymour, who is one of the best d-linemen this league has ever seen.

In 1999, Cleveland would have been better off taking Champ Bailey #1 overall than Tim Couch.

Point is this: just because every draft guru says a player is great doesn't mean he is. Reggie Bush has proven NOTHING. So, until he does, criticizing Houston's move is silly. If Mario Williams develops into a great defensive player, it was a smart move.

Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Aug 17, 2006 6:46 PM EDT   0 recs

Let's look at those drafts...
You can't say anything about Carr for the fact that the offensive line in front of him has been/is GARBAGE.  I firmly believe that even with a decent offensive line, that Carr would be a top quarterback in the NFL.

Also that year was a pretty weak draft in the way of game changing superstars.  There are quality players but not one single superstar there.  Carr is still the closest to being the best player in that draft.

2001 the number 1 pick is LaDanian Tomlinson not Richard Seymore.

2000 Shaun Alexander (then Brian Urlacher)

1999 Donovan McNabb Edgerrin James Ricky Williams would all go before anyone on defense.

So once again, offense is always more important that defense.

Don't get me wrong, defense win championships.  But a great defense doesn't need superstar players while a great offense does.

by Chad on Aug 17, 2006 7:13 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Ad-medium-smq

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Peyton4prez_small
Hall of Fame
Small
LATEST ON MARVIN
Alt_small
Gridiron News
Ookla_small
Spector
Brady_sack_small
John Clayton mentions Harrison
Bob-sanders-081107_small
The 200 best players of the modern NFL
Small
E-MAIL ANSWER
Small
any updates on marvin situation?
Alt_small
Sorgi, Betts, or Tafralis?
Bob-sanders-081107_small
How long before the rookies help the Pats?

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Ad-banner-faketeams
Site Meter