Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Randy Moss A Raven?

Tribute to Tarik Glenn

As fans, we got some closure with this. Tarik Glenn walked away from football yesterday after spending about a week discussing the situation with coaches and management. In a rare well-written article that provides thoughtful insight, the Indy Star's Bob Kravitz articulated why Tarik decided to walk away from about $5 million this season, and a jack pot lottery next season when Tarik would become a free agent:
Glenn is doing something few athletes do in professional sports: He is leaving on his own terms. He is writing his own script. Most guys have to be extracted from the locker room with the Jaws of Life. Most guys stay too long, hang on for the money or for the make-believe life they will never know again in retirement.

Glenn was different from the beginning. And he was different in the end. Admirable, every step of the way.

Most important, he is getting away from this brutal game with his health. When he is 40 and 50 and older, he will still be able to walk, to play with his kids, to enjoy a quality of life that is often denied those who give their lives, and their bodies, to the NFL.

Glenn is getting out while he still can, in one piece, with a sense of peace.

For the reasons Kravitz states above, I have no problem with Tarik walking away. Is it annoying that this is happening before Training Camp? Yes. As a fan, I'm all ready and geared up to start the season. Then, this hits. But, unknown to me and about everyone else, retirement had been brewing with Tarik for some time. And unlike a lot of athletes, Tarik did not overstay his welcome. He's walking away healthy, happy, and content.

Why would anyone be upset with that?

To give folks some perspective on just how great Tarik Glenn was, for 9 years he manned the LT position on the Colts o-line. He missed a total of 6 games throughout his entire 10 year career; all of them in one season, 2003. Think about that for a second. While you do, here's a picture of Tarik:

During his 9 years at LT (his rookie year he played guard), he protected one quarterback: Peyton Manning. Through all the highs (winning the Super Bowl), and all the lows (the o-line choking in the 2006 playoff game against Pittsburgh), Glenn and Manning always protected each other. When morons like Terry Bradshaw and Mike Florio crowed that Manning had called out his o-line after the Pittsburgh playoff loss in 2006, Tarik was quick to dismiss their opinions and tell it like it was. When Colts fans bitched and moaned about Tarik's annoying false starts, Manning would state right in and say, without hesitation, that he'd only want Tarik Glenn at LT.

It seems like an eternity ago that Tarik was taken #19 overall in the 1997 draft. He was drafted by then-Colts GM Bill Tobin, made famous for putting Mel Kiper Jr. in his place, and essentially cementing Kiper's career as ESPN's resident draft hack. Tarik was drafted to protect Jim Harbaugh, but he played the 1997 season at guard while fellow 1997 draftee Adam Meadows played LT as a rookie. Needless to say, Harbaugh took a beating that season and the Colts finished 3-13. The next year the Colts fired Tobin, drafted Peyton Manning, moved Tarik to LT, Meadows to guard, and the rest is history.

Throughout Tarik's career, he was under-appreciated. He played his college ball at Cal, and while there he was also unappreicated. At the pro level, inferior players like Baltimore's Jonathan Ogden went to Pro Bowls over Tarik, even though Tarik's QBs got sacked less and his RBs ran for more yardage overall. It wasn't until Ogden was exposed as a fraud by Dwight Freeney that Tarik started getting some Pro Bowl love. From 2000-2007, Tarik was the best LT in the AFC. From 2004-2007, he was the best in the NFL. Better than Ogden. Better than Seattle's Walter Jones. Better than them all. However, because Tarik was invited to so few Pro Bowls, and never made an All-Pro team, he won't be considered for the Hall of Fame. At Tarik's retirement announcement, someone asked Bill Polian if Tarik was a Ring of Famer. The answer is yes, absolutely. I personally don't want to see another player wearing #78. It's weird enough seeing rookie Michael Coe wear #32. #78 is Tarik's number, and nobody should ever wear it again in a Colts uniform.

So, Tarik is gone. This means one of the most important positions for an entire club (the LT position) is now vacant. What does this mean for the Colts? Obviously, anti-Colts fans are jumping up and down for joy, claiming this is now what will doom the Colts. It's important to note these people said the same thing last year when Edgerrin James was not re-signed. Look how that turned out.

It's important to stress that the Colts had some idea Tarik's tenure with the Colts was ending. There were no plans to re-sign him after this season. If there were plans, why spend a first round pick in 2008 to draft Tony Ugoh in the second round of 2007? Ugoh possesses all the physical tools to succeed Tarik and write another chapter as a LT for the Colts. He has an outstanding o-line coach in Howard Mudd teaching him the way, and a steady crop of veterans and Pro Bowlers available and willing to tutor him. If Ugoh isn't ready, the Colts have guys like second year player Charlie Johnson, who impressed coaches and players last year while filling in at RT. Even Tarik mentioned Charlie during his press conference yesterday:

"I really believe in Charlie. I've always thought he was a really good player, a talented player. He's smart. He's athletic. He's competitive. He'll be able to do the job.
If you want to feel better about this whole thing, read this article on Colts.com. The Colts have tremendous depth along the o-line, and their system forces their players to learn multiple positions. We have a whole Training Camp and pre-season to see who will win the position.

When all is said and done, the LT position will fall into good hands, and the Colts offense will glide along just fine, thank you very much.

Still, no one will ever replace Tarik Glenn. He was a premiere LT, a team leader, a locker room presence, a community provider, and a genuinely great person to have on your club. Guys like that come once a blue moon, and we fans should appreciate them when they come along. And when they walk away with the grace and dignity of a Tarik Glenn, we should appreciate them even more.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

i'm with you
i'm definitely with you on putting Tarik's number in the ring of honor. He anchored one of the most stable and solid O-lines in NFL history.  Not a hall-of-famers-across-the-board o-line, but one when stacked up against others overall should be favorably compared with the best. Tarik was the heart of that.

Sadly he won't get NFL HOF consideration, but the team should honor him for sure. Ideally I'd like to see him and maybe Marshall Faulk both honored when the new stadium opens in '08.

It definitely hurts to lose him, and I do expect at least the first half of the season to see more false starts and more sacks given up. Possibly even some shuffling of the line until the find the right guy for the job (Johnson? Ugoh? Someone else already on the line moved to LT?) but I have faith in o-line coach Howard Mudd. if anyone can mold Tarik Glenn's replacement quickly and well, it's him.

Happy trails, Tarik. Enjoy retirement, and hopefully we'll still see you around the Colts sideline as a supporter in years to come.

(future O-Line coach in the NFL Tarik Glenn? He certainly learned from the best and I think it'd be a great move for him someday)

by jdb on Jul 25, 2007 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

BigBlue
the reason losing Edge didn't hurt you was because Addai turned out to be a real stud, I'm actually targeting him as my number pick in my fantasy leagues. I think he'll have a big year, although losing Glenn will hurt him as well.

To say either Johnson or Ugoh will be able to replace Glenn effectively and it won't slow down your offense is wishful thinking. Your offensive machine now has its first real weakness which many teams will obviously exploit.

by Terry @ Stampede Blue on Jul 25, 2007 2:23 PM EDT reply actions  

asdf
Where has ANYONE said it won't slow down the offense at all? yeah, there will be an adjustment period for sure. but the Colts have a proven track record of getting rookies and young players up to speed and playing at or above their potential on the OLine very quickly.

No one is saying it won't hurt, but saying that this is going to expose some huge weakness in the Colts is wishful thinking on the part of Colts haters such as yourself.

by jdb on Jul 25, 2007 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

okay, here it is by BBS
"When all is said and done, the LT position will fall into good hands, and the Colts offense will glide along just fine, thank you very much."

we'll see who is really wishful thinking and who isn't once the season starts. If Manning starts running for his life like some scared little girl then tell me it isn't a weakness. On the other hand, I'll admit I was wrong if either Ugoh or Johnson play well and Manning reamins practically untouched all season, okay.

BTW, I'm not a Colts hater or I wouldn't be targeting Addai in my fantasy leagues. I also like Harrison and Wayne. If I were a hater I wouldn't like anyone on your team.

by Terry @ Stampede Blue on Jul 25, 2007 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hello Terry
Nice to see you again. Let's save some time: You've expressed a biased opinion and cite no empirical evidence to support it. I'll challenge your opinion and offer objective reasons for my position. Then you'll claim that my objective reasons don't matter and offer one of the following 4 defenses for your position: 1) "I don't need stats, I know it when I see it", 2) "Everybody knows this", 3) "You're kidding yourself," 4) "Well, we'll see." Then we can go about our lives and be none the wiser.

But of course, life isn't that simple. So here's a couple of things:

You say "losing Edge didn't hurt you because Addai turned out to be a real stud..." I agree. I guess the Colts braintrust did a good job drafting Addai. The Colts braintrust usually does a good job drafting. They drafted Peyton over Ryan Leaf and Edge over Ricky Williams. I know these seem obvious now, but trust me, they were once hotly debated topics around the NFL. They also find impact players in lower rounds or as undrafted FA's (June, Rhodes, Bethea, Saturday, Johnson, etc.etc.)

And Howard Mudd is pretty universally regarded as one of the best Offensive Line coaches in the NFL. So, the point is, why do you think that it is "wishful thinking" to believe that "Johnson or Ugoh will be able to replace Glenn effectively" without slowing down the offense?

And did it occur to you that the offense might pick up with a legitimate WR3 and with your beloved Addai getting more carries? In an earlier post you belittled Johnson for playing well in the Super Bowl at RT instead of LT. And you are quite right that RT is not the same position as LT. But why would you assume that a guy who played well at RT would fail at LT without knowing the situation? The people who draft well and coach the line well really like Johnson, but Terry doesn't. Who do you think I'm gonna trust on this one?

And by the way, if your proof that you're not a Colts-hater is that you're considering drafting Addai in your fantasy leagues, let me say this: I hate lots of teams and lots of players in the NFL. But when I play fantasy football, I try to win. There may be a very few players who I'll refuse to draft out of general principle (e.g. Michael Vick), but I would even draft Tony Romo if he was the best player available (unlikely though that may be). And Colts players are usually among the best at their respective fantasy positions (Manning, Harrison, Wayne, Addai, etc.) So I don't give you points for objectivity when you happily draft Colts.

By the way, I'm really hoping to get Marion Barber in my draft. Does that mean I have to pretend to like the Cowboys?  

     

by ctnyc on Jul 26, 2007 1:46 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm not like that however
I can't root for a player I don't like so I don't draft them, and that goes for teams as well. Does that make my fantasy strategy weaker? probably, but I don't care. I've won a few fantasy championships in my day so thats the way I draft. Believe me, if I were a Colts hater, no way I draft Addai. I really hate the Eagles so that means Westbrook is automatically off my list although he's a great player.

Regarding your LT problem, I'm looking at it from an objective, non homer Colts perspective, unlike you or any other blogger on this site.  I'm not guaranteeing Ugoh or Johnson won't be good players someday, I'm saying they aren't as good as Glenn right now which automatically makes the Colts offense less effective. Addai or Gonzalez or any other Colts skill player cannot do anything if the O line isn't blocking, that the way football works.

So you and the rest of the Colts homers on this site can certainly believe nothing will change, but over 30 years of studying football tells me otherwise.

BTW, if you want to win your fantasy league, draft Romo. You'll be able to get him in later rounds, but he's going to put up numbers close to Manning.
You heard it here first.

by Terry @ Stampede Blue on Jul 26, 2007 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Terry
when was the last time that you enjoyed the company of a women?  I am sure you reel them in with the whole "I have won a few fantasy championships in my day" line.  

by johnnyU on Jul 26, 2007 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

What color
is the sky in your world, Terry?

OK, as for fantasy football, you can absolutely do whatever you want, that's what fantasy is all about; let's not get hung up on that.

It's your other fantasy that I'm concerned with, the one where you're objective and everybody on this site is a blind homer (no punny reference to Greek poets intended).

To wit: you say that I "and the rest of the Colts homers on this site can certainly believe nothing will change..." How exactly did you get that idea? Amongst the many posts and diaries about this subject are plenty of remorseful comments, lots of hoping it wasn't true before it was confirmed, and lots of love for Tarik. Here's a few sample quotes :

"This is a tragic loss of a veteran leader..."
"Hoping he will have a change of heart..."

and 3 from BBS himself:

"No one will ever replace Tarik Glenn."
"He is indeed a significant loss."
"Obviously, losing Tarik is a big, huge gigantic loss."

Yes, Terry, it really sounds like we are happy to have him go and that we don't think there will be any dropoff. Seriously, do you even read other commenters before you form your opinions about them?

I have seen some comments that try to make the best of it (finding a silver lining if you will). These are along the lines of:
Maybe we can use his cap money... at least we're getting rid of his false starts too... we have capable replacements and great coaching, plus a QB who gets rid of the ball quicker than anybody... etc. Do you have a problem with these? What are Colts fans supposed to do? Cry in our beers and moan about how the sky is falling? Somehow you have equated this impulse to move on and look at the bright side as Colts fans insisting that there will be no dropoff. Quite a leap in logic, if you ask me.

And finally, you tout your "objective, non homer Colts perspective." Well, let's take a look at some of the things you've written about Tarik's retirement:

"I'd be really worried."
"Good luck, you'll need it."
"Your Colts are going down this season."
"No way the Colts repeat now"
"You can try to talk yourself into believing your scrub backup will do the job, but that's just blind faith, won't happen."

AAhhhhhh, there's that refreshing Terry-brand "objectivity" that we've all come to know and love.

Look Terry, I'm telling you this for your own good if you ever want to be taken seriously: if you're going to spout opinions with no empirical support and no proof of any kind whatsoever, at least make sure these opinions can't be torn down by using your own words that are a click or two away for everybody to see. This is not a case of disproving your knuckleheaded opinions with some obscure stats or theories; the quotes I've used in this comment are all right there on the screen! We've been talking about this for days in multiple posts! Did you really think we'd forget so quickly what we said or what you've said?!?

A quick look at the facts show that we are not homers who believe nothing will change, and that you are far from objective. And yet you doggedly claim the opposite to be true.

So I ask again: what color is the sky in your world?

by ctnyc on Jul 26, 2007 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never contridicted myself once
so I don't know what you're talking about.

by Terry @ Stampede Blue on Jul 26, 2007 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

bravo!
excellent comment. You deserve a medal of some sort. :)

by jdb on Jul 27, 2007 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

First class weasel
The most wrongly used word in the vocabulary of first-class weasel Bob Kravitz is his use of the pronoun "we".  Kravitz makes a typically Kravitzian comment about false starts, then he expects the reader to think like his addled brain does.  No Bob, "we" don't give Tarik grief.  That's you and you alone.

by coltsfan on Jul 26, 2007 9:19 AM EDT reply actions  

First class weasel
The only reason Kravitz wrote this article with such a positive tone is because he sees Tarik's retirement as making the Colts less competitive.  He'd cream his jeans if Manning decided to retire early.  If Tarik had decided to sign again for another year he'd be whining about how he's not worth the money, etc.

I don't doubt that Tarik made the right decision for himself to quit football.  This is a rough way to make a living after all.  A smart player will have piled up enough money by now to maintain himself financially without playing.

by coltsfan on Jul 26, 2007 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

time to go
i have nothing but respect for a player who decides it is time to go...  does anyone like seeing the Favre's and jerry rice's who hang on for too long and embarass themselves?  or a steve young who is beaten up so badly they are forced to retire... with who knows what consequences 10 or 20 years later...

by bluegirl on Jul 26, 2007 1:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Stats Prove It: Brady Is Now a Choker

Recent FanPosts

Small
How to build a championship team
Small
Two more colts assistants
Small
Co-existence
Img_0497-comp_small
Colts Mock Draft
Small
Tony Ugoh
Small
Jim Irsay on Peyton Manning Last Week
Small
next years' starting lineup
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Small
Colts Mock 1.0
Indianapolis-colts_small
Indianapolis Colts 2012 NFL Draft Mock W/ TRADE SCENARIO

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Sbmanning_small Stew Blake