Recap 2007 AFC Divisional Round: Colts 24-Chargers 28
![]() |
|
|
We were wrong, and both Tony Dungy and Bill Polian have a lot of explaining to do.
Let me first say that Dungy and Polian are the best at what they do. The fact that there is a credible debate between who is better between Dungy and Belichick speaks volumes about both coaches. And Polian is, quite simply, the best GM in football. Scott Pioli does a great job in New England, but he has nor proven himself outside New England. Polian built the Bills and Panthers before creating the champion Colts. That said, both Dungy and Polian did not approach these playoffs in the best way possible, and both share some of the blame for the team's disappointing exit.
Let's not over state things though: The Colts persevered through a season defined by devastating injuries. It's a feat in and of itself that they made the playoffs minus Dwight Freeney, Booger McFarland, Tarik Glenn, Rob Morris, and Dominic Rhodes. All those players were absolutely vital to Indy's run in 2006, and none suited up in these playoffs for various reasons. Adding to that the fact that other key players (Robert Mathis, Raheem Brock, Antoine Bethea, and Marvin Harrison) simply weren't healthy for this game, and it's a miracle the score was even close. Injuries are never an excuse for losing. The Chargers certainly didn't use them as an excuse. But, at some point, your team needs to get healthy and perform.
This year, the Colts never did. Here's the game recap:
- We are now, once again, provided a wonderful litmus test for a person's intelligence: Anyone who blames Peyton Manning for this game is a complete focking idiot, and anything and everything they think or say afterwards is irrelevant. For example: Yahoo.com's editorial staff. Notice the article title ("Colts can't win the big one... again") has nothing to do with Michael Silver's actual article. Here's a quote from Silver abut Manning in the game:
So there I was in the RCA Dome press box Sunday, watching Peyton Manning complete his first 14 passes in guiding the Colts to a 10-7 halftime lead, and I'm thinking, "Is the NFL the most blessed entity on earth, or what?"Yahoo editorial staff = Total morons, and complete Manning-haters. Sure, the Manning-haters will return because that is what their life revolves around: Hating Peyton. They've been in Hell the last year, and now that his team has (shock!) lost a playoff game, they are dancing like pixies. These people were always losers (like Bill Simmons), and dismissing them has always been easy. For people that actually understand football, Peyton's performance was brilliant. He started the game completing 14 straight passes. He threw for over 400 yards, 3 TDs, and was as efficient throwing as we've ever seen him. His two INTs, both deflections off the hands of receivers, were not his fault; especially Kenton Keith's screw-up. Some will say he should have scored with them inside the five yard line at the end, but tipped balls, dropped passes, and bad protection are not the fault of Peyton. He played a tremendous game, and anyone who think s otherwise is simply wrong, and their opinion should be dismissed outright.
- Marvin Harrison had no business playing Sunday, and Bill Polian out-and-out lied to us fans about his health. Marvin should have been IRed a long time ago, and the Colts should have brought in another receiver. Marvin fumble in the first quarter was huge, and really changed the game. He did not play in the fourth quarter, where he was sorely needed. I hope this is not the end of the great Marvin Harrison, but it does not look promising.
- If you want a goat, place the onus solely on the defense. They stunk up the RCA Dome for its final game. No better example is San Diego's final TD drive, with their back-up QB and RB scorching the Colts defense. The total lack of a pass rush was evident. Mathis and Brock were non-factors, and did not have any real feel for the game. On the final drive, Darrell Reid was playing DE. That is always a bad sign.
- The penalties were unforgivable. San Diego had 10 for 79 yards. That's expected from them. They are a poorly coached, undisciplined football team. But the penalties for Indy were atrocious. Marlin Jackson's DUMB personal foul penalty on the final SD touchdown drive was the key play of the game. That was on third down, mind you. SD would have had to punt if not for Marlin's dumb play. Bob Sander's taunting Nick Kaeding was also stupid. These kinds of things are unforgivable for a Colts playoff team.
- Kenton Keith sucks, and I never want him in a Colts uniform again. The dropped pass, which resulted in an INT, should give him his walking papers. The lack of any kind of running game really hurt the offense. Tom Moore got away from the run too quickly, and Manning was asked to literally carry the team.
The biggest disappointment was the lack of sharpness from the team, which stems directly from the injuries. Much will be said of "resting starters" at the end of the regular season, but the fact of the matter is the starters were hurt. Robert Mathis, Raheem Brock, Marvin Harrison, Antoine Bethea, and even Joseph Addai had not played a meaningful game in over a month. These guys weren't "rested." They were hurt, and were given no time to get re-adjusted to playing full speed. When you take into account all the massive injuries this team faced, it is indeed something that they got to the post-season.
Remember, after the Patriots won their first Super Bowl, they stunk it up the next year, missing the post-season entirely. Following the Steelers recent Super Bowl, they too choked the following season and missed the playoffs. These are facts our little friends in Chowda Land and Crapsburgh love to forget.
So, while it is disappointing, the team did accomplish some things this season. This group is a very different group than the won that won it all last year. Tony Ugoh, Gonzo, Pitcock, Devon, Kenton Keith, TJ Rushing, and Tim Jennings did not play (or weren't on the team) last season, and all were vital parts of this year's team. Combine that with losing Freeney, Harrison, and Booger and things fall into place.
For us, the silver-lining is the team is young, talented, and hungry. Losses like this have often propelled the Colts to great things, feeding a need to redeem themselves. In addition, the diaries and comments from many of you contributors on this game have been great, in particular Ron L, bluegirl, and several others. As always, we fans will simply have to accept this loss and move on. The off-season will be filled with idiot rumblings about 2006's "fluke" Super Bowl, Manning is a loser again, and Dungy's status with the team. That's fine. You aren't going to change the mind of stupid people. All we can do is take stock: Our team is moving into a brand new, beautiful stadium. Our team is still very good, and likely most of our injured guys will come back 100%.
It's still a bright future. Never forget that. Go Colts!
0 recs |
55
comments
Comments
Recap
The injuries throughout the year just got to us. Peyton looked awfully good, but the rest of the team just looked worn out, scrambled, generally not ready. Although we got through an injury-riddled year at 13-3, it seemed to really catch up to us in the last game of the year. Clearly, with the level we played at yesterday, we wouldn't have had a prayer against New England.
Agreed about Keith. The guy just cannot make it happen.
by clownsaw on Jan 14, 2008 12:30 PM EST 0 recs
Giving the coaching staff a pass
Dungy is the best coach in the NFL? Sure he's good, but where's his accountability? How many great coaches have lost two home games after a bye in the playoffs? Cower? Not many. I think a lot of the blame for 2 exits in the first round in the last three years falls on him. This year the defense was flat. Two years ago there were legit excuses, but "best coaches of all time" don't have that happen.
This team was every bit as good as last year, if not better, even with Harrison and Freeney hurt. A first-round exit shouldn't be excused as a "they were lucky to make the playoffs" loss. Instead, there should be some introspection on why the team (mostly the defense) was so different in the playoffs than the regular season.
by MadTownColtsFan on Jan 14, 2008 12:51 PM EST 0 recs
Dungy
You can have your opinion on how I should have worded my recap, but if you don't think Dungy is a great coach, you're wrong.
by BigBlueShoe on
Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM EST
up
0 recs
On bad memories
Remember, after the Patriots won their first Super Bowl, they stunk it up the next year, missing the post-season entirely. Following the Steelers recent Super Bowl, they too choked the following season and missed the playoffs. These are facts our little friends in Chowda Land and Crapsburgh love to forget.
We haven't forgotten the 9-7 year. It's a sore spot. But it sure is nice to rub a little back-to-back on it--it eases the pain considerably. I'm sure my friends in Pittsburgh feel the same way.
by NotJohnHannah on Jan 14, 2008 12:56 PM EST 0 recs
Colts latest failure
Perhaps my bias is showing, I've gotten used to the play of the 2007 Patriots. Tom Brady always leads his team to victory, Brady does things that other QB's simply cannot do. The N.E. defense always makes the stop when it counts the most. Guess I've gotten used to watching the best.
As I stated in another post, last years's Super Bowl season may very well have been Peyton Manning's swan song. We'll see what the future brings.
by horseofadifferentcolor on Jan 14, 2008 1:40 PM EST 0 recs
it's getting old
by KingRichard on
Jan 14, 2008 1:50 PM EST
up
0 recs
I know it stings but...
You have hounded Brady endlessly for the forced throw in the waining minutes of last year's AFCCG, I would appreciate your honesty here in condemning Manning for his failure on Sunday... versus a depleted opponent, in his own yard no less. Tremendous is not how I would describe his effort against San Diego. When the game is on the line and your team is first and goal from the six - you gotta get that TD. The best in the NFL get that touchdown.
by horseofadifferentcolor on
Jan 14, 2008 2:42 PM EST
up
0 recs
I know...
Then everybody realized that some times Teams do get a hot streak or lucky breaks. (Tuck rule anybody?)
Even the best can fail, and failure is a better teacher than success.
The Colts will be back with a vengeance next season...that much is assured, cause what the SB win in 2007 did was shape the character of a team.
And they came so far without having any hired guns. That's the beautiful part of it.
by rangerover76 on
Jan 14, 2008 2:49 PM EST
up
0 recs
RR
by horseofadifferentcolor on
Jan 14, 2008 3:51 PM EST
up
0 recs
Manning did the best he could
As I said before, I love Dungy. But the man looked lost on the sideline. Belicheat never looked lost. Dungy never looked like Turner did yesterday. Turner is an idiot, sure, but he was on th edge the whole game. So was Rivers. Rivers was seeing blood. There's no way he could have been stopped with that poor effort by the D.
It's sad, after all. It's just plain sad. But nobody with a brain should blame Manning. He was the only Colt yesterday that knew it was a playoff game.
by MerryGoByeBye on Jan 14, 2008 1:46 PM EST 0 recs
Fumble that ball
by MerryGoByeBye on
Jan 14, 2008 1:47 PM EST
up
0 recs
Not to sound arrogant but,
by bleedingblue on Jan 14, 2008 1:54 PM EST 0 recs
Dungy&Polian...best at what they do?
by Brady2MossTD on Jan 14, 2008 2:07 PM EST 0 recs
The Patriot Way
The real question is "How much of this loss goes on Manning's shoulders?" You can't leave him blameless. He made bad passes. But there's a reason you pay these guys big money to do what they do.
As for Dallas, he'll be back. But he better spend the entire offseason running routes and catching balls, because if he makes ONE DROP next year, the fans are going to rake him over the coals.
We can talk about Ugoh's block on 4th and 5, but there isn't another rookie left tackle I'd rather have. He's going to be a great one, he just needs time to develop.
Gonzo went from being the #2 WR to 1C yesterday. He's earned Peyton's trust, and is going to keep getting better.
The Colts preach speed above all else, but they need a hammer on the defensive line. It's too easy for big tackles like SD's McNeil to shove Mathis, Brock, and everyone else around. They need someone that can bull rush their way past these guys and get to the QB.
People are saying that we don't need Booger, but I think we need him more than people think. A veteran DT is never a bad thing to have. Put him back in the lineup, and I think we're in much better shape.
Long story short: the Colts will be back, and better next year. All those rookies and first time starters will have a year of experience. They'll be playing in a brand new stadium, where for a couple of months of the year they can open the windows and let in some fresh air. Remember: the year after NE and PIT won their Super Bowls, they didn't even make the playoffs.
by MonkeyBusiness on Jan 14, 2008 2:11 PM EST 0 recs
I left you guys last week
by bleedingblue on Jan 14, 2008 2:12 PM EST 0 recs
Also
by MerryGoByeBye on Jan 14, 2008 2:15 PM EST 0 recs
my only issue
Yet you then go on and list all the reasons after a loss why the stars weren't aligned for Indy. Which one is it BBS? This is why people come and give you grief. It just doesn't add up.
by Blitzburgh on Jan 14, 2008 2:22 PM EST 0 recs
What about it
People come here and give me grief because (like you) they wish their team was as good as the Colts.
by BigBlueShoe on
Jan 14, 2008 3:52 PM EST
up
0 recs
Luck plays into it as well...
by PaytonMenning on
Jan 15, 2008 12:55 AM EST
up
0 recs
The last part
In summary, right now: it sucks. Big picture: we're still looking good.
And remember -- only 6 months 'til training camp!
by ctnyc on Jan 14, 2008 2:36 PM EST 0 recs
haha
Would someone go read my diary and tell me how stupid my ideas are please.
by KingRichard on
Jan 14, 2008 2:41 PM EST
up
0 recs
See you next year
In any case, I mean no disrespect to the Chargers, but I am truly disappointed that the Colts and Pats will not get to face each other in the AFC championship. The Colts are a superb team that always invoke feelings of absolute fear in me, and Pats-Colts are one of the truly great sports rivalries. See you all next year (literally in '09, as I am sure they will both be in the play-offs again).
by A Boston Sports Fan in Hawaii on Jan 14, 2008 3:24 PM EST 0 recs
btw
by A Boston Sports Fan in Hawaii on
Jan 14, 2008 3:27 PM EST
up
0 recs
hey for you baseball fans
by bleedingblue on
Jan 14, 2008 4:49 PM EST
up
0 recs
ah baseball
and my raptors are way behind the celtics in the atlantic division.
by torontocoltsfan on
Jan 14, 2008 5:20 PM EST
up
0 recs
Hawaii
by coltsfanawalt on Jan 14, 2008 3:43 PM EST 0 recs
Thanks...
My dad spent a year in Indiana for college, and he enjoyed himself quite a bit. I went to school in the Boston area (hence my allegiances), so I guess sometimes Hawaii folks do seek out cold weather climates!
by A Boston Sports Fan in Hawaii on
Jan 14, 2008 3:54 PM EST
up
0 recs
what??
by dewi on Jan 14, 2008 4:55 PM EST 0 recs
Already said
So no, Manning isn't the sole reason they were put in the bad spot, but he is the reason they didn't get out of it.
by ZTurgeon on Jan 14, 2008 5:08 PM EST 0 recs
it took a perfectly
by shake n bake on
Jan 14, 2008 5:33 PM EST
up
0 recs
Some Pats fans crack me up.
At least the Colts fans can honestly say that our QB is great , but our team hasn't always been. Our defense was pretty bad until last year, and even then they were only decent in the playoffs. We've had some good individuals on defense, but over the past decade the unit has been either bad or mediocre. One of the reasons Dungy was brought in was to beef up the defense, because it was bad. Freeney, arguably our best defensive player, goes down, and it's like old times again.
We admit that the Patrots have had the better team, but we don't agree about the QB position. Manning has been the one thing that has kept us competitive at times the past decade. He's simply awesome. Why do you so desperately want to take that point away?
The Pats fans should say that is good. They have had the NFL's best team so far this millenium, and that is something else. But instead, they rob that glory to compare Brady to Manning, as if Brady has ever had to overcome a subpar defense or a poor team performance.
I'm a lifelong Wolverines fan. It is great for our university to see Brady excel in the pros. He is an excellent QB on an even more excellent team, with the ultimate mastermind for a coach. It is not all about his play. The ONE time last year that his defense let him down (AFCCG), he couldn't pull it out in the end, nor seal the deal on the drive before that.
Is my point that Brady isn't that good? NO. My point is that the team wins and loses, that no player is perfect, and everyone in football needs their team to support their attempts at victory.
It just seems like a silly way to compare QB's. Teams, yes. It also seems ridiculous for such an excellent team to try so hard to diminish the greatness of a phenonmenal QB. I would start to suspect insecurity, but that wouldn't make much sense.
by coltsfanawalt on Jan 14, 2008 5:56 PM EST 0 recs
Peyton
Plus, Peyton is just insufferable in all those commercials. Double Stuff Racing League?
by TedyBrewskie54 on
Jan 14, 2008 6:40 PM EST
up
0 recs
Rings are team stats
by MerryGoByeBye on
Jan 14, 2008 7:01 PM EST
up
0 recs
Question..
Vinatieri never gets a chance to kick the game winning field-goals without Brady there to engineer the drives that got them into FG range. My contention is that the key to those past victories was Brady, not the kicker. Try this question - who is easier to replace Brady or the kicker? How 'bout this one - who will win another Super Bowl this year, Brady or Vinatieri??
See what I mean. It's a team sport but without the great QB it's a losing-team sport.
by horseofadifferentcolor on
Jan 14, 2008 7:12 PM EST
up
0 recs
A better question
I know what you mean, and, hey, Brady is a wonderful QB. But football is a team sport, and as such, nobody wins unless everybody is on the same page, playing at the highest level.
by MerryGoByeBye on
Jan 14, 2008 7:20 PM EST
up
0 recs
True but...
by horseofadifferentcolor on
Jan 14, 2008 7:40 PM EST
up
0 recs
Don't get me wrong
by MerryGoByeBye on
Jan 14, 2008 9:03 PM EST
up
0 recs
2006 AFCCG
I was listening to an NFL talking-head this morning on the radio and he made a very good point about the game last Sunday - he stated: Peyton Manning was clearly not responsible for the Colts loss but, he must be the one held accountable for not winning it. I think that his comment makes a lot of sense.
by horseofadifferentcolor on
Jan 15, 2008 12:15 PM EST
up
0 recs
I agree
If it was Brady on Manning's shoes on Sunday, I think he wouldn't have scored that the TD either. The O-line and the receivers were so off, it was almost sad for Manning.
by MerryGoByeBye on
Jan 15, 2008 1:13 PM EST
up
0 recs
Why
by BigBlueShoe on Jan 14, 2008 6:47 PM EST 0 recs
Troll?
by ihavethemelody on
Jan 14, 2008 11:30 PM EST
up
0 recs
faoisijgaig
by KingRichard on
Jan 15, 2008 9:45 AM EST
up
0 recs
Happy to make you laugh...
Every successful team these days must have top level quarterback. Those that lack them are relegated to also-rans. The Patriots win because they have the most skilled QB in the NFL... maybe the finest ever. (let's see how many SB titles he's able to collect)
I understand your arguement; yes, football is a team sport. In the Patriots case, the team supports Brady in many ways but, without Brady I believe N.E. becomes one of those also-rans. The Patriots are an elite team solely because Tom Brady runs the offense. This year his supporting cast has been upgraded, hence the remarkable season.
I sat there yesterday watching the Colts/Bolts game and waited for Manning to do what Brady does and it didn't happen. I know damn well he wanted to make the plays but, he couldn't do it.
It's quite clear, and I think it can be stated without question: As the quarterback goes, so goes the team. It certainly can't be stated that: As the team goes, so goes the quarterback.
It seems that you consider the Colts QB to be great but, not great enough to produce a victory for his team. Conversely, the Patriots QB has shown this year that despite the aged & fairly pedestrian make-up of the defense, he has been able to deliver the tough victories. Much like the great offenses that the Colts fielded in the recent past, the Patriots are doing the same this season.
The truth is - the Colts have relied on Manning to get them to the Super Bowl and the Patriots have relied on Brady. The respective teams have always been the support, not the show. The fact is, Brady is about to take his team to the SB for a fourth time, Manning has managed it once.
Now... you tell me the QB doesn't matter most and I contend that it does. Manning's good, Brady is better.
by horseofadifferentcolor on Jan 14, 2008 6:55 PM EST 0 recs
Defense wins championships
The reverse hype by some journalists (particularly those stationed in the northeast), and most conveniently by Pats fans on a mission for Brady, is that it is all about the qb's suddenly. I disagree, he is a part of the puzzle, but a part that has been overcome in times past, whereas bad defense has never been overcome in a superbowl run. Again, defense wins championships.
Your continued insistence to make Brady greater based on a team stat is bewildering, but I chalk it up to the typical mentality of your insecure fan base, which by the way has nothing to be insecure about. Yet here you are, kicking some disappointed Colts fans, proving how much it bugs you that we ever look good, too.
The Colts defenses have largely stunk through the years, and the Patriots haven't. That is all the difference. No Qb makes every singledrive work, including every single game ending drive. Both Brady and Manning have proven that. But the Pats have continued to prove my point. Defense wins championships.
Too bad some of their fans can't see that, and continue to throw the team accomplishment under the bus in their attempt to line up behind the supermodels...
by coltsfanawalt on
Jan 15, 2008 11:37 PM EST
up
0 recs
defense wins...
Offense now wins Championships. You watch.
by horseofadifferentcolor on
Jan 16, 2008 5:14 PM EST
up
0 recs
See you next year
I was looking forward to a rematch of last year's AFCCG, but I'm not one to take the Chargers lightly. They're hot right now, and showed a lot of heart yesterday. If only Manning had been able to come through at the end, we'd have been treated to possibly the most anticipated conference championship game in NFL history. As it is, keep heart Colts fans, there will be more opportunities.
by 6thround on Jan 14, 2008 6:58 PM EST 0 recs
Why?
by TedyBrewskie54 on
Jan 14, 2008 9:35 PM EST
up
0 recs
1st class
Nothing like getting your butt whooped in your own stadium to make you want to insult fans of other teams. Way to show your pride.
by Steelkings on Jan 14, 2008 9:37 PM EST 0 recs
Man
by metalmilitia on Jan 15, 2008 1:56 AM EST 0 recs











