"Coaches in Waiting" article is complete "Piece of Crap"
Don Banks is typically pretty good, but his most recent article is an example of a "journalist" writing a story and making selective facts fit within its confines rather than looking at the facts and then writing the story. Banks' recent work makes the statement that the struggles for Seattle, Indianapolis, and Dallas are the result of the owners of those teams naming successors to the current head coaches. Banks interviews two anonymous NFL general mangers, and they give their opinions on how naming a successor to a current head coach could result in losing. Here is Banks quoting an unnamed AFC general manager on the subject:
"In any organization, in- or outside of football, where there's a lack of the true lines of authority, it's going to be a problem. Even if it's a situation in the NFL where there's a team that has a coach and a general manager, without either one of them truly being in charge of the decision-making. The players need to know that the line of authority is clean and clear.''
However, what Banks and this moron AFC General Manager (I'm assuming Phil Savage of the Browns) leave out of the equation are all the other variables that come into play here, namely injuries. I'll go team-by-team here, but if you want a clear, accurate reason why Seattle, Dallas, and Indy are not leading their respective divisions the answer is injuries.
Now, that answer is not an "NFL correct" answer. Injuries are never supposed to be an excuse for losing. For players and coaches, they aren't and can't be. But when you step back and look at the big picture, logic (and basic common friggin sense) says that Seattle losing their entire WR corps and their starting QB to injury might have a bit more to do with their 2-6 record than the status of Mike Holmgren and his designated successor, assistant coach Jim Mora Jr. Sadly, writing an article about that is not as sexy as one suggesting naming successors is the reason these teams have disappointed of late.
Crap articles like this reinforce my feeling that sports journalism is dead; that informing fans about the sport is less important than writing a "sexy" story full of unsupported facts and bad, BAD logic. If you really want to know why Seattle, Dallas, and Indy are struggling, here is why:
Since Week One their WR corps has been decimated. Deion Branch has been out most of the year with a foot injury, and Bobby Engram was lost back in August. Add to this the injury to QB Matt Hasselback (which has kept him out for many weeks), and you have a recipe for disaster that most clubs cannot recover from. Compounding the issue is the injury to DE Patrick Kerney, who is Seattle's sack master. Kerney is out indefinitely. So, to put this into terms many can understand, imagine the Giants losing Osi Umenyiora (which they did), but also Eli Manning and his entire starting WR corps. If you still think the Giants would have a winning record now (let alone a 7-1 record), you're out of your friggin mind.
The only people shocked that the Cowboys stink right now are Cowboys fans and moron journalists. Even without the injuries, Dallas was a mess from the outset. Wade Phillips was always a short term puppet; a man with no authority over the roster. Even if he did have authority, Phillips has never proven himself a quality head coach in this league, especially when things go south. And when you stock your team with players like Terrell Owens and Tony Romo, you are invited disaster. These are not people who are known to keep their composure when things go wrong. They panic, point fingers, and do not inspire others to rise up to a challenge.
And then, there is Jerry Jones, one of the most incompetent football men in the sport. As a business man, he is outstanding. As an evaluator of talent, he is a complete boob. Terry could draft better for Dallas than Jones, and he'd probably sign better free agents. Anyone shocked by Dallas' mid-season collapse was blind to the obvious. This is not a high character team, and it starts with their owner.
Like Seattle, injuries are a big reason why the Colts are at .500 at Week Nine for the first time since 2002. Pro Bowlers Jeff Saturday and Peyton Manning started the season hurt. Bob Sanders was knocked out in Week Two, and just came back last week against the Patriots. DT Ed Johnson was kicked off the team in Week Two, and his back-up (Quinn Pitcock) quit football prior to training camp. Starting LBer Tyjuan Hagler started the season on PUP, as did starting OG Ryan Lilja. Dallas Clark has missed several games with injury, and Joseph Addai just returned from missing three games with a hamstring tear. Starting CBs Marlin Jackson (out for year) and Kelvin Hayden (out since Week Four) have missed significant time. And, recently, WILL backer Freddie Keiaho has been out.
Pile all that up boys and girls, and you have 4-4. If you have been around the Colts, you'd know that Dungy is still the man in charge, and this team certainly has not quit on him. Games like the comeback wins over Minnesota and Houston prove that. For the last three years, pretty much everyone knew that Jim Caldwell would succeed Tony Dungy. They just announced what everyone already knew this past off-season. From 2003-2007, the Colts did not have to contend with the kind of injuries they have sustained this season.
If Don Banks had done his job, he'd have written that, and not the crap he printed recently.
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Seattle didn't have much margin for error in the first place
most years they were getting by just because the rest of their division was awful. This year the Cards stopped being the Cards and they didn’t have the division by default no matter what happened.
Shonn Greene for Heisman
140 yards per game
6.3 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA
by shake n bake on Nov 7, 2008 11:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
You're bang on about Dallas
They’ve been thin the last few years and it’s finally caught up with them. They were extremely injury lucky the last couple seasons.
As for the Colts, yes, injuries have played a part. But to me, being .500 has more to do with Peyton just playing poorly (for him). Which obviously has nothing to do with having a “coach in waiting”. This article was quite the hack job.
Hopefully Peyton will continue playing well. He looked awesome Sunday, and pretty much won the game by himself (with assists from Belichick and David Thomas).
by Jay Cutler's Barber on Nov 7, 2008 11:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Didn't you make Banks'point?
You claimed that Banks is way off by blaming DAllas’ poor performance on management issues, but you go into great detaill about those very same management issues. Jason GArrett in the wings is just part of the overall problem – but his play calling has been weak and perhaps more a cause for Dalla’s funk than injuries.
by Perseverence on Nov 8, 2008 5:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The article is half right, in my opinion.
I think the fact that Dungy’s successor has been named is having an effect on the team, but not so much on the players actions. I don’t think a team with players like Jeff Saturday, Peyton Manning, Gary Brackett, D-Free, etc… would allow a team to mentally check out. That being said I know I’m not the only colts’ fan that feels like the head coach has mentally checked out from time to time. Now, before you rip me to shreds for this, just think about it for a minute. Think about some of the challenges he’s made and some he hasn’t made. Think about some of the activation/deactivation choices he’s made. Think about the scheme they’ve been playing and how its been attacked the same way in almost every game this year. Now, I had given up a long time ago on Dungy being the kind of ‘on the bench with a dry-erase board’ type coach that Belichick is. And yes, ‘do what we do’ always annoyed the bajeezus out of me. But the one thing I always knew in prior years was that no matter what happened in the first half, the Colts would come out with some decent adjustments. Now, no, they never won them all, but this year, where are the adjustments? Our team seems better prepared in the FIRST quarter than the third. How many games have we had this year where we’re able to get a lead, but the other team adapts to what we’re doing on O and D, and our O is done and our D just can’t hang anymore. The jacksonville game? The Houston game? Titans?
I give the Colts a pass on three losses: Chicago (they were in shambles with Peyton still clearly hurting), Jacksonville (Yes, the coaching was horrific, but they still found a way to win, Walt Coleman just made sure they lost) and Green Bay (I thought the Colts actually played pretty well on defense, but every key drive for GB was extended due to penalty (and I thought a lot of them weren’t even there) and a lot of Colts drives were either ended due to penalty, or not extended due to penalties that were there, you can’t out coach officiating).
I wish that Dungy would either retire or not retire, but not hem and haw. I realize he does it after teh season, but if you have to take friday’s off, your heart isnt in it. And I think the organization should have been allowed to pick their own head coach after Dungy leaves. I don’t think more of the same is what the Colts need.
by Nideak on Nov 7, 2008 2:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think he's said something similar to this, but it's very true about him
His coaching style is different. He’s a teacher more than anything. The defensive players are always working towards perfecting their execution. The scheme (curriculum) doesn’t change much if at all, he works with the players at fixing the little flaws and lapses as they get better and better at it. The turnover on defense plays into this. You can only play a simple scheme so well and after that the instruction doesn’t add much, but with the exception of a few spots players serve out their contracts and are replaced by new students of the scheme.
Shonn Greene for Heisman
140 yards per game
6.3 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA
by shake n bake on Nov 7, 2008 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Precisely
But the one thing I always knew in prior years was that no matter what happened in the first half, the Colts would come out with some decent adjustments.
In years past, if we were down a TD at the half, I wouldn’t be concerned. This year is a different story. I tend to think its a combination of things…but you’re right – it doesn’t look like the adjustments are being made, and if they are then the players haven’t been able to execute them.
It’s very frustrating to go from a strong 2nd half team to this.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 7, 2008 3:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
not a strong 2nd half team?
The Colts have been down 2 TDs in 6 of their games and are 4-4
Shonn Greene for Heisman
140 yards per game
6.3 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA
by shake n bake on Nov 7, 2008 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You with your stats.
You’ve got me on that one.
Why does it feel like they are losing their energy in the 2nd half?
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 7, 2008 4:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't even look that one up
Simmons used it to bash the Colts in today’s column
Shonn Greene for Heisman
140 yards per game
6.3 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA
by shake n bake on Nov 7, 2008 4:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Link
Do you have a link for that column?
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 7, 2008 4:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here it is
this is what I said about it on 18 to 88:
Go to Simmons’ column. Start reading it (especially the Browns and Vikings comments). When you finish the Bills comment at #16 STOP. STOP RIGHT THERE, DON’T EVEN LOOK AT THE NEXT TEAMS LISTED. DON’T READ ANOTHER WORD.
until you come back here and tell me honestly that you don’t think Simmons is a fun read.
Then you can read the rest of the column and flip out on him for being a clueless homer.
Shonn Greene for Heisman
140 yards per game
6.3 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA
by shake n bake on Nov 7, 2008 4:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Shake.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 7, 2008 5:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok I stopped at 16
He’s fun, that’s true. Witty, even.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 7, 2008 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He left Indy blank?
what a jackass.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Nov 7, 2008 5:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm fine with him just talking about the Colts-Pats game
for both team’s comments. Where he’s a jackass and a clueless homer is the order is lists them in.
Shonn Greene for Heisman
140 yards per game
6.3 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA
by shake n bake on Nov 7, 2008 6:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
or...Colts encounter weak 2nd half teams
Statistics can be deceiving. Down 14 to Minnesota and Texans, and watched them collapse. That moved two losses to two wins. Thats where you get 4-4 out of your down by 14 in 6 games: we lost the other 4 outright. Where is the strong 2nd half adjustment evidence?
by Perseverence on Nov 8, 2008 5:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But you have to admit...
Bill Simmons is an entertaining blogger. His writing is better when the Pats ( or other Boston teams) are not dominating. He then spends his time cming up with other witicisms regarding other teams, players, and situations. He is obviously a sports film buff, and you will miss many of his witty parallels if you aren’t aware of the film characters/stereotypes that he references.
by Perseverence on Nov 8, 2008 5:19 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















