Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NFL Power Rankings for Week 11

2008 NFL MVP Race: King off the Warner bandwagon

Last week, we took some shots at our favorite punching bang from SI (Peter King) for his laughable notes on the 2008 MVP race. This week, it seems Peter King has had a bit of a revelation. Maybe he read something here and it sparked a thought in that coffee-stimulated brain of his. Or, maybe someone just dropped a rock on his head just to shake out the cobwebs. Whatever happened, Peter King is finally starting to make some sense:

I think Kurt Warner is rapidly playing himself out of all those nice things -- like a third MVP, like a winning January -- he'd played himself into through the first 10 games of the year. At some point, an MVP has to win a game he shouldn't win. Warner hasn't had one of those yet this year, and though he's played very well overall in engineering the Cards' 7-5 record, he's been downright bad in big games on the road, including throwing interceptions to end the first two drives at Philadelphia Thursday night.

Welcome to the world of the living, Peter! We've been saying for weeks how the Warner for MVP bandwagon was a silly mockery of what the MVP is all about. MVPs come up big in big games against tough teams, especially on the road. Last year's MVP, Tom Brady, won a tough games on the road in Indy and NY. Warner, meanwhile, has nearly made the turnover look like an art form when he plays quality opponents on the road. Again, Warner's resurrgence is a great story, and Arizona fans have every right to root for him. But after Thursday's meltdown, Warner is now officially gone from the MVP radar. Like Washington's Clinton Portis (who was the mid-season favorite before his team started to suck), Warner just hasn't done enough to prove he is the best player in the NFL.

The same is true for Saints QB Drew Brees. Brees was another reason why the Warner for MVP talk was silly. Brees is clearly a better QB than Warner. Yet, with their loss to the Bucs yesterday, Bress knocked himself out of the MVP discussion. His team, likely, will not make the playoffs and no legit MVP-candidate sits home in January. This doesn't take anything away from Brees and what he has accomplished in New Orleans. Without a defense and the continued suckiness of non-running back Reggie Bush, Brees has managed to will New Orleans to respectability seemingly by himself. Brees is a helluva player; a top 5 QB now. He doesn't need an MVP to prove that.

So, with Warner, Brees, and Portis now out of the picture, the MVP race is pretty much a one man race now. Boring, I know. But it is accurate. Hell, it is so obvious, even Peter King gets it now:

MVP Race

1. Peyton Manning, QB, Indianapolis. OK. You give me an MVP after the debacle weekend of so many candidates. Manning ascends to the top by default, despite engineering zero touchdown drives for only the fifth time in a 10-year NFL career. This is a seasonal award, obviously, because of the Colts being 8-4 and Manning being most responsible.

As we have said for some time, Peyton Manning is the 2008 MVP. No debate. No argument. If you disagree you are wrong and you can go sit in the corner, facing the wall. When known blockheads like Bill Simmons and Peter King finally get it, you know it is so obvious it might as well have flames and sparklers shooting from it.

Now, in typical WTF! fashion, Peter King lists Falcons rookie QB Matt Ryan as the #2 MVP candidate. Look, Matt Ryan is a very good rookie QB, but if he is a legit MVP candidate, I'm no longer watching NFL football and dedicating my blogging Sundays to the PBA Tour. Why not throw Joe Flacco in there as well, Peter! His team is 8-4 and, like Ryan's Falcons, Flacco's Ravens are currently in the playoff picture as the #6 seed. Personally, I feel Jets QB Brett Favre is the #2 MVP candidate. Yes, his team lost to the Broncos at home yesterday. Yes, he played poorly. So what. People have bad games, and the Jets had just finished beating the Pats and Titans in previous weeks. Favre will likely bounce back next week.

The other real, legit MVP candidates are Titans QB Kerry Collins and Giants QB Eli Manning. My arguments for these candidates are simple: Without Collins, Vince Young continues to stink it up in Nashville and the Titans are .500 right now, not 11-1; Without Eli Manning, the Giants have David Carr throwing the football ('nuff said). The fact that niether of these men are on King's MVP radar suggests Peter's two feet are not quite firmly planted in the realm of the totally conscious, but for now we are just happy that he has seen the light regarding Peyton Manning. Baby steps for everything else. Baby steps.

So, why all this MVP talk?

Well, for one, it is cool to talk and write about MVP races. They are fun. Yes, admit it. They are. Remember, football is supposed to be fun, and if you do not see the fun in talking about MVP races, get a pulse. Do they mean anything in terms of who wins it all? No, of course not. Last year's MVP choked big time in the Super Bowl, and was outplayed by a guy who was booed in his home stadium just one month prior. In terms of the ultimate prize, the Super Bowl is way cooler than any regular season MVP award. However, this year the MVP award has an extra layer of drama added to the fun. It was starting to look as if writers were going to give Kurt Warner, a man who will never sniff the NFL Hall of Fame, his third NFL MVP. Only one other player has won three MVPs: Brett Favre. Favre will obviously be a first ballot HoFer, and if he wins his fourth MVP, he will further cement his legacy as one of the greatest ever to play.

Better than Elway. Better than Montana. Better than Starr. Better than Graham. Maybe better than Unitas.

So, knowing the stakes, giving the MVP to Warner would be kind of a slap in the face to previous award winners. How can a guy who will never get a HoF vote (nor should he) win three friggin' league MVPs? Fortunately, Warner has been re-exposed as the turnover monster he always was, and the person who will likely join Favre as the only other three-time NFL MVP is Peyton Manning. This is the way it should be. Yes, it is boring. We know Peyton is great. Why give him yet another award?

Answer: Because the great ones should always win the awards until someone better comes along. Deviation from that cheapens the award, and Peyton Manning is clearly the best player in this league right now. Once again, Peter King shows us he has a little life after all:

Let me tell you a story. My Sirius NFL Radio partner, Randy Cross, was on a Frontier Airlines flight from Denver to Atlanta eight nights ago after doing Oakland-Denver for CBS. Frontier has satellite TV at every seat and Cross and his seat neighbor were watching the waning moments of the Indy-San Diego Sunday-nighter. The Chargers kicked a field goal to tie the game at 20 with a minute and a half left. The ensuing conversation:

Seat neighbor: "Overtime.''

Cross, pointing to the time remaining: "The Chargers are toast.''

Seat neighbor: "Why?''

Cross, pointing to Peyton Manning on the screen: "Because of him.''

Eighty-seven seconds later , after another game-winning drive by the master of them, the Colts were walking off the field with a 23-20 win.

Thanks for the story, Peter. Now, do us a favor and hide those power rankings. You do not help your cause by ranking the Steelers and the Cowboys ahead of the Colts. The Colts beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh, and the Cowboys... well, they just suck in general. Beating up on the Lions doesn't magically make them a legit contender again. But whatever. Peter has seen the light regarding Peyton Manning for MVP.

Baby steps with everything else.

0 recs  |  Comment 49 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Actually, the Falons are the #6 seed at the moment.

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Dec 1, 2008 11:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Also I’d like to point out two more things:

1. If Warner doesn’t get inducted into the HoF then something is wrong. It’s pretty ridiculous to think he won’t even be considered, let alone be voted in.

2. Favre eliminated himself from MVP contention yesterday along with Brees, which you stated.

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Dec 1, 2008 12:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why should Warner be an MVP candidate?

He has only had three good NFL seasons: 1999, 2001, and 2008. He also lost his starting QB job in St. Louis, New York, and Arizona. In fact, he lost his starting job in Arizona TWICE. No way does he sniff HoF.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Dec 1, 2008 12:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let’s see what Warner has accomplished:

Highest completion percentage, career (minimum of 1500 attempts)
Highest average passing yards per game, career (minimum of 100 games)
Most Yards Passing, Super Bowl – 414 yards vs. Tennessee Titans (only QB to pass for 400+ yards in the Super Bowl; also owns 2nd highest yardage total in Super Bowl with 365 against the New England Patriots)
Highest Rate of Games w/300+ Yards Passing (minimum of 100 games)
Most Consecutive Games w/300+ Yards Passing – 6 (tied w/Steve Young and Rich Gannon)
Most Games with a Perfect Passer Rating, Career (regular season only) – 3 (tied w/Peyton Manning and Ben Roethlisberger)
2 time NFL MVP
2 Super Bowl appearances
1 Super Bowl Championship
Super Bowl MVP

Pretty decent list if you ask me.

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Dec 1, 2008 12:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Counterpoint

He has played 10 seasons, and only 3 were good seasons. I don’t care what his numbers are. That stat alone kills everything you just posted. HoFers play consistently good. not good one year, bad the next FIVE. Again, I think Kurt Warner’s story is amazing. The guy has accomplished an awful lot. But the Hall of Fame is reserved for the best of the best, and Kurt Warner is just not in the same category as the Elways, Marinos, and Mannings.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Dec 1, 2008 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

On the other hand

Kurt Warner has done a lot more than Joe Namath.

Bullets Forever: A blog dedicated to the Washington Wizards with analysis, commentary, and more YouTube videos than your eyes can handle.

by JakeTheSnake on Dec 1, 2008 1:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Namath

A personally think Namath has no business in the HoF. But, I can’t control that.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Dec 1, 2008 1:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And I wouldn't either

But if HoF voters thought he was worthy of induction, then they could just as easily think Warner is worthy as well. I wouldn’t be shocked if he doesn’t get inducted right away, but I get the feeling once our memories of Warner fade and people that weren’t old enough to watch Warner play will start taking a look at the stats KR posted, and they’ll start going “Wow! How is this guy not in the HoF? Look at those numbers!” And then some internet campaign will start and build enough momentum to get him in.

I’m not saying it’s right, but it is what it is.

Oh, and internet campaigns are awesome BTW.

Bullets Forever: A blog dedicated to the Washington Wizards with analysis, commentary, and more YouTube videos than your eyes can handle.

by JakeTheSnake on Dec 1, 2008 3:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention there at least 4 of his 10 years in the league were cut short or made irrelevant due to injury. I guess what I’m trying to say is, the guy is no fluke, he’s a great quarterback and has accomlished more in 3 great seasons than most run of the mill QBs do in 15, but yet he isn’t HoF worthy? A shame if you ask me.

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Dec 1, 2008 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

forget everything else he's done

anyone who leads the cardinals to any success is a no doubt HOF’er. 2 topics in a row king, i’m gonna have to stop posting.

by hal41605 on Dec 1, 2008 3:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't care if PK is in our boat on this one

he’s still an idiot. I’d rather him not have Peyton as the favorite.

Let's go Colts!

by AJforAZ on Dec 1, 2008 12:04 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Warner

A guy, who in 11 seasons only has had 3! with 12 or more starts should never even be considered to the Hall Of Fame.
A guy who has had 97 starts in his career, and by the way has had 89 fumbles!, should not be considered hall of fame.

A guy who from 2002 to 2007 had an average rating of 81.95, should NOT be considered to be hall of fame.

He just hasn’t done enough, in my oppinion

by Sinding on Dec 1, 2008 12:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Warner has done some amazing things in his career, but he is not a HoFer.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Dec 1, 2008 12:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ryan, Favre...

It seems to me that before considering Ryan and Favre for MVP, you would have to consider Michael Turner and Thomas Jones. They are both at the top in terms of running backs in the NFL. If you consider Jones and Turner you have to consider Adrian Peterson, who does not play with good QBs like Ryan and Favre.
I think Peterson needs to be considered for the MVP after Manning…

by LasEspuelas on Dec 1, 2008 1:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Fox Sports Radio

said that Romo should be in contention. I then turned off the radio.

but after watching Peterson against the tough run defense that the bears have he deserves to be 2nd place behind Peyton.

by FreeneyWillEatYourBaby on Dec 1, 2008 2:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Romo?

I don’t get it. He was out for a month and his play prior to his injury was hardly award-worthy. Puhleez.

Peterson’s play was great last night. He never ceases to amaze me.

Somebody gave me a hard time yesterday with regards to Peyton’s numbers…I promptly reminded him that at least we beat the Browns (said irritant is a Giants’ fan.)

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Dec 1, 2008 2:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

it obviously has to do with the fact that

the dallas offense couldnt get a first down when romo was out… and now that he is back they have won 3 games in a row and the offense actually moves the ball…

by zkmavz on Dec 1, 2008 3:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And therefore back to the "true" meaning of

Most Valuable Player

I could see he should be in the hunt.

by LovinBlue on Dec 1, 2008 3:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just imagine our season

if Peyton were out – for any length of time.

Besides, I have faith Romo will screw up in the near future. Don’t get me wrong, I like the kid, I just don’t see him as an MVP yet.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Dec 1, 2008 3:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am at a distinct disadvantage.

I can’t trash talk Eli and the Giants, because I really like them.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Dec 1, 2008 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If he had lost yesterday...

would Peyton also be out of the MVP hunt? I’m all for giving the award to Peyton, but we’re being a tad bias (shocker, I know). Favre shouldn’t be out of contention just because of one crappy game if we don’t want Peyton to be ignored for yesterday’s performance. But I agree that Favre and Ryan both benefit from their running games. Addai is so frustrating this year. Had to buy a Dallas Clark jersey because I was ashamed of wearing 29.

by hoosierdore on Dec 1, 2008 3:39 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You make a good point.

Now, I’m going to be completely biased and bring up the dreaded knee surgeries….(c’mon, you had to know it was coming)…Favre didn’t have any knee surgeries, although he did miss two weeks of training camp acting like a spoiled rotten brat. (I’m still angry with him – I used to really like him and now I’ve lost respect – it bums me out)

Addai is frustrating this year, Dom is also frustrating. I think we could have Brandon Jacobs out there and our run game would be frustrating…

Which brings me to this: does anyone else think that Brandon Jacobs is a viable contender for MVP? I know the Giants have 3 great runners, but I don’t think the other two are nearly as effective without Jacobs wearing down defenses (and dragging along them for 5-6 a carry) the man is a monster. And, I don’t think Eli is as effective without the run game.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Dec 1, 2008 3:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think Brandon Jacobs gets it just because he is just one head of the Giants’ three-headed monster. The Giants’ line is just disgusting this year. I honestly think the award should go to Adrian Peterson since nobody is breaking any records (while making the playoffs).

We should get down by 21 in the first half against the Bengals and let Peyton lead us back to victory. That should help his campaign.

by hoosierdore on Dec 1, 2008 4:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d prefer to see a blowout tbh.

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Dec 1, 2008 4:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How about: Colts 72, Bengals -1450815986908198691286901691846916. Ya?!

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Dec 1, 2008 4:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Dec 1, 2008 5:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

If we’re going by the argument that the way a QB elevates his team and just plain wins, then I respectfully submit Matt Ryan. He’s got a better than 2:1 TD to INT ratio. He’s turned a team widely forecasted to win 2 or 3 games into a playoff contender. He’s been a clear leader for this team and actually is putting up some mighty fine numbers for a rookie.

Maybe I’m a homer, but I think you at least have to put his name in the discussion.

by Dave the Falconer on Dec 1, 2008 5:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

hate the guy

but I think he’s a better candidate than most

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Big Ten's leading Rusher, Leads FBS
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Dec 1, 2008 5:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The other big reason he has been successful this year

Is Michael Turner. I think Turner deserves more consideration for MVP that Ryan.

by mgrex03 on Dec 1, 2008 6:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd agree he's a good candidate

But when Turner has faltered, Matt Ryan has actually stepped up his game. Part of what has impressed me is the way he’s managed to evade sacks and make very accurate throws on the run. Without his ability to get things done through the air, Turner would be facing a lot of stacked fronts.

by Dave the Falconer on Dec 1, 2008 6:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm against a rookie being MVP

There is an award for rookie of the year. The kid is doing great, but make him Rookie of the Year.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Dec 1, 2008 6:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Here here

was going to write the same thing

by LovinBlue on Dec 1, 2008 7:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ugh.

You start the article so well, preaching right to the choir (me), but then it devolves into statements that make me wonder how I can possibly agree with you on anything when you’re so wrong about other things.

Favre, Eli, and Collins are not MVP candidates. They’re not even in the discussion. They are three excellent examples of QBs overshadowing the accomplishments of their excellent teams.

This is not to say that any are not playing well – Favre and Eli especially have exceeded expectations and Collins is having his best season in a decade – but they aren’t the reason their teams are winning.

Yes, Vince Young sucks and we shared the same groan when he got hurt and the Titans upgraded, but they still posted a 10-6 record and made the playoffs in spite of him last year. What does that tell you? That even with terrible quarterbacking, the rest of the team is good enough to make the playoffs. This year, they upgraded the O Line (Scott), the DLine (sort of, with Kearse – not a big deal, really, but depth makes the guys in the rotation fresher, plus keeping Fatty playing for a contract was wise), and the RB (Johnson). Their secondary has improved with a year of seasoning. So it’s no surprise that a ten win team improved. Collins’ only job is not to screw up. He is the poster boy for that stupid term “game manager.” He just has a better arm and more talent than guys like Frerotte and Johnson and the other schmucks who have won with good teams, so he’s better at it than they are. But he hasn’t won a single game for that team. He’s not bad, but he’s not even close to irreplaceable. Titans MVP: The D Line

Eli Manning appears to have made the leap, and with each week he makes my arguments against him look worse and worse, but much like Collins, when you play behind a line that good, with a running game that good, on a team as well rounded as the Giants, it’s hard not to look good. Eli can do more than Collins, but again, anyone could succeed on that team. Gus Frerotte would be leading the NFC with that team. Giants MVP: O Line.

Favre is an interesting case. I picked against the Jets this year after they picked him up because I thought he’d make plenty of mistakes and that the other acquisitions were overrated. I was wrong about both. Favre has been uncommonly accurate and disciplined for over a month. I’ll even give you the stupid argument that he makes everyone around him better by giving them confidence (vs Pennington) (I feel dirty saying that though). Maybe that makes them a game better than they’d be with Chad. But really, what has Favre done? Much like last year, if you watch the games you’ll notice that the reason he’s not screwing up as much is because the opportunity isn’t there. He has, in many ways, been neutered. The Jets run the same short passes and screens and slants dozens of times a game. Credit Favre for having the patience and accuracy to complete them and work well in that style, but it’s basically the west coast style. Force him to throw downfield like yesterday and what happens? You get a 50% completion rate, an 0 for 5 on 20+ yard attempts, and bad interceptions (he was lucky several were dropped). The Jets have succeeded on offense because of good coaching (play design), good blocking, a good running game, and yes, good quarterbacking. But the biggest single reason the Jets have been successful this year (aside from the cakewalk schedule) is Kris Jenkins. That man has been even more dominant this year than Haynesworth was last year. He has made the rest of the D better and dominates the line of scrimmage. You can’t credibly call Brett Favre the MVP when there’s a bigger difference maker on his own team.

According to Aaron Schatz (who cites someone at the Boston Globe), it’s legal to vote for an entire unit rather than a single player for the MVP. In that case, you have to take the Giants O Line. Have to. They’re incredible this year. They’re the obviously biggest reason a team people picked to defend their title by finishing 4th is the clear best team in the NFL.

Realistically, there’s a better chance of me getting hit by lightning three days in a row. Take that away, and yes, Peyton is the most important. It’s funny, because his individual statistics are down across the board. But even though he’s doing less, he is more important to the team than he has ever been. He is that “it factor” DZ mentions. No, he didn’t carry them to victory in the Browns game, but without him they don’t win 3 or 4 of the other games. They don’t get close enough to win the Jaguar game either. Even when he’s off his game, he’s irreplaceable. There’s one other player in the league that could have this team at 8-4 in his place, and he’s on IR. Put in the other MVP candidates that you mention and they’re 5-7, 6-6 at best. With the exception of the special teams, 93, 98, and 33, the Colts as individuals have underperformed (vs our admittedly high expectations – I agree with your assessment of this team’s overall talent level). Even 18 has. But he has put the team on his back and carried them to victories that not even the 2nd best QB in the league could have gotten. It’s incredible, and it’s really weird to watch. So I agree with you… but I don’t.

by willyduer on Dec 1, 2008 6:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Eli wouldn't be in my top three

as far as MVP voting goes, but you need to give him a little more credit than that. if you’re inferring that the Giants would be 11-1 with Gus Frerotte, then you’re delusional. if you need a barometer to measure just how far Eli has come in 11 months, take a look at the last two games. in back-to-back road games, Arizona and Washington both stacked the box to take away the run and Eli went for 240 and 3 TDs vs. the Cards and over 300+ yards in DC…and that’s with Domenik Hixon, (the other) Steve Smith, and an ancient Amani Toomer.

you’re right that the offensive line has been great, as has the defensive line. i’m not saying Eli is the MVP by any means, but he’s a huge reason as to why the Giants are where they’re at. also, as much as it pains me to say, Romo absolutely deserves some consideration. that team was a mess without him. Peyton could really help his cause by carving up Cincinnati and Detroit – in two weeks he could be an MVP lock.

by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Dec 1, 2008 7:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Eli, Collins and Favre are all doing well because they have incredible O-lines and great rushing games. They can afford to pick their times to throw. Plus, they all also have pretty solid D’s (although the Jets pass D is soft) which mean they can keep most games close and work the run.

Matt Ryan wouldn’t be my #2 MVP pick, but he’s been hugely impressive this season considering what an absolute shambles the Falcons were last season.

by eltharion_doa on Dec 2, 2008 3:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

King

The Cowboys beat up the Sea Chickens. They don’t play the Lions.

They, like the Colts, can be a scary team in January, though. (If they get there.) I wouldn’t be so hard on them. There’s a good chance they’ll end up like the 05 Chargers, dangerous but on the outside looking in, but if they get in, that’s an unfriendly matchup for either Manning brother.

by willyduer on Dec 1, 2008 7:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Big shoe blue you are joke

Manning throws 3 picks against one of the worst teams in the league and you are still riding him as MVP….his QB rating stinks…if anything his brother is the better QB this year

Bottom line…the cards haven’t won the division in 30 something years…warners numbers regardless of who he is playing against are very strong despite having zero for a running game (meaning everybody knows he’s going to throw and he still is racking up monster yardage, completion percentage, td’s, passer rating, etc)….only 1 out of his 3 picks against the eagles resulted in 7 points…the cards where down by 21 at a blink of an eye…his recvers fianally had a bad day of dropsies which hurt him. his defense, special teams and running game are stinking up the joint..(note the cards passing d has given up the most TD’s in the league and their running game is dead last…..

warner is the best qb in the league in right now and his numbers show it, but as ususal most people as yourself don’t give the guy any credit because he wasn’t a first round draft pick

by japrams on Dec 1, 2008 8:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Who did Manning have 3 interceptions against?

The King of Anti-Fail and Unofficial Moderator of Stupid People

by KingRichard on Dec 1, 2008 8:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, people don’t give Warner any credit because he’s been padding his stats against the worst division the NFL will ever see*.

(*probably)

by eltharion_doa on Dec 2, 2008 3:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's amazing that Manning

Plays like absolute garbage, throws two picks and no touchdowns, and PK elevates him to 1st in the MVP race. You guys need to realize that outside of this blog, nobody has more of a man-crush on Manning than PK.

by BeansCarter on Dec 1, 2008 10:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Oh good, the smart people have arrived.

King is a boob but he did say that the ranking was mostly because the other guys played their way out of it.

Warner is good and the Cards are a great story but they’re only winning their division because the other teams are horrible. Against good teams Warner hasn’t been bad, but he hasn’t carried them either. I haven’t seen his draft status come into the discussion anywhere – that’s an interesting take, japrams.

Beans, did you even watch the game? Manning played fine. He forced one to Wayne that was picked because it was underthrown (possibly into the wind), had a pick on a hail mary at the end of the first half (who cares), and had a ball dropped in the end zone. There wasn’t really any vertical passing game but he did throw some darts and moved the offense on three long drives fairly easily that just didn’t get into the end zone. It was just one of those games. He didn’t win the game, but he hardly played like garbge. 15-21 in the wind is about all you can ask for.

Manning, despite a down year, means more to his team than ever before. He’s the glue holding an otherwise average and injury-prone team together, single-handedly winning games. I don’t expect him to get the votes to win an MVP, but he and Jenkins are the two individuals with the most impact on the games so far this year.

You guys just keep looking at the ESPN statistics instead of watching the games. Eli is a lot better but you’re on crack if you think he’s having a better or more valuable season. He still throws 4 or 5 awful throws per game. His INT rate is pretty lucky too, as he has had an uncommon number of dropped picks this year (most against the Skins in both games). I guess it balances out the million drops his own guys had the past 2 years though.

Stephen Baker Touchdown Maker (You f’ing rule!), I suppose it’s possible that Gus would’ve played poorly enough in a game or two to possibly cost them the game, but there definitely hasn’t been a game where Eli had to shoulder the load. I guess I’m not saying he can’t – he certainly grew up a lot in the super bowl – just that he hasn’t had to, and that he’s not the best or most valuable on his own team.

by willyduer on Dec 2, 2008 12:38 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

15-21

for 125 Yards. Considering he calls his own plays, you can’t really give him much credit for dinky little screens and short dumps. Maybe ‘garbage’ is harsher than necessary, but let’s agree that he didn’t play like an MVP candidate. There are several examples this season where he didn’t.

Kurt Warner may have thrown 3 picks, but he also threw 3 touchdown passes. QB ratings are fairly decent benchmarks of how well a QB has played, especially when offenses are designed around the passing attack. Manning lays another egg like last Sunday and you won’t be able to make a case at all that he deserves MVP.

by BeansCarter on Dec 2, 2008 8:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Steelers are much better than the played us, to be honest. The Cowboys…well, they’ve looked pretty good since Romo came back. But they’ll get their big tests in the next three weeks.

by eltharion_doa on Dec 2, 2008 3:13 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

yes peter king picked the jags to go to the superbowl. anything he says is pretty much laughed at now. I cant even read his column anymore. the fact that he sees the light now, Im pretty sure he will come back next week and go back to his usual ridiculous statements of something thats totally off the wall.

does anybody think he will give manning props at season ends? he will find some other idiot thing to cover up his cluelessness

by kinnickcolt on Dec 2, 2008 3:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Warner's still a candidate

I know I’m stepping into the lion’s den here and I know that after the past couple of weeks, Warner’s really hurt his case, but here’s my thoughts:

 - First, his overall career and past MVP’s should have no bearing on this year’s award. That doesn’t make any sense at all. But if we’re going to look at history in order to determine this year’s MVP, than Warner leading the Cardinals to their first division title in three decades and their first home playoff game in half a century should also go into account.
 - Why are Collins or Eli candidates? They’ve been marginal at best and the best case that you can make for them is their team’s record and how bad their backups are. Their team’s record has much more to do with their defense and running games that with their QB play (more so in Collins case than Eli’s). Also if we’re going to consider how a team would do with their backup, where would the Cardinals be if Leinart was the starter?
 - The Cardinals still have a big road game against the Pats and if (big “if” but still) he plays well in that game, he should be in any MVP talk. He’s on pace to finish somewhere around 35 TDs, 15 picks and just under 5,000 yards. Those are MVP numbers.

Warner’s having a great season despite having the worst rushing attack in the entire league and the 27th ranked scoring defense. He’s the only reason that they win games, is that the definition of “Most Valuable Player?”

by cgolden on Dec 4, 2008 1:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No Adrian Peterson?

I agree that Peyton Manning should most likely win MVP

But as a Vikings fan, Im shocked no one has even mentioned Adrian Peterson

He literally faces 8 or 9 men in the box almost every play and has very average (at best) quarterback play

He averages 113 yds/game (1st in NFL)
4.9 yds/carry (T-3rd in NFL)

He is on pace for 1800 yards and leading the Vikes to the NFC North title

Without Adrian, I can see the Vikings winning 6 games this year… maybe less

In games that go into the 4th quarter and less than a touchdown, Adrian averages 5.5 yds/carry

He literally has carried the Minnesota Vikings on his back this year

by diswan5 on Dec 16, 2008 2:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bob_sanders4_small
Jerraud Powers: Old Man
Bilde_small
Sebastian Vollmer had help on Freeney 36 out of 44 passing attempts
Bruce-treetops1_small
Ask Baltimore Beatdown: Questions for the Ravens Blogger
Nnamdi_small
Why The Colts Really Won and the State of the Rivalry
Small
Manning to Wayne Touchdown, Tecmo Super Bowl Style

Recent FanPosts

Belicheat_small
College Football- Open Thread
Small
College Open Thread #2
Img_1672_small
Matt Stover!
Peyton-manning_small
More bad journalism (read at your own risk)
N17901640_32485246_6102070_small
Gonzo update
Small
Gary Brackett
Peyton_framed1_painting_small
Cool Video on Sunday's Game
Small
Question: What is Deion Sanders issue with Peyton & the Colts?
Bullard47_avatar_version2_small
Thursday Night Football Open Thread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editor

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Contributing Writers

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Seyton_manning_feature_small KingRichard

Change_small Colts Homer