Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Could we possibly see Vince Young actually play like a QB this year?

610x_medium

Vince Young might look like a QB this year folks.
Photo: Newsday

Vince Young has sucked as an NFL QB the first two years of his pro career. There's no denying that, and any attempt to sugar coat his crappy play is nothing more than Kool-Aid drinking. We've talked about ole Vince many times here at Stampede Blue, mainly because we enjoy being right. All the things we said about Vince (he's lazy, he can't throw from the pocket, he's dumb, he has character issues, and he whines like a sissy Mary when he doesn't get his way) were all true. Some NFL scouts pointed out these very flaws before he was drafted, but no one listened. The Titans won 10 games in 2007 in spite of his horrid play, with one of those games a mailed-in job by the Colts in Week 17 because they had locked up their playoff seeding. The Titans were then hosed by San Diego in the playoffs the next week.

And, of course, Vince played terrible in that playoff game.

Laziness at the QB position has been a hallmark of the Titans for many years. But this year, we might actually see something different from Captain Patron. We might actually see him... gasp!... read a defense! Maybe even... OMFG!... throw a pass accurately from the pocket! Why do we suspect this? Pete Prisco offers his insights from Titans camp:

In his two seasons in the league as the Tennessee Titans quarterback, [Vince Young] has been much more media-made creation than the star he's perceived to be. His magical athletic ability made fans and media members alike drool about his improvisational skills, forgetting his inability to scan the field and make all the reads -- the true job of a quarterback.

Yes, yes, yes. We know that Pete. Vince sucks and was an over-hyped, ESPN chump who couldn't play the QB position at the pro level, despite morons like Tom Jackson and Tony Kornheiser vomiting on us all the time that he was a "winner." Tell us something we don't know.

So I came here to Nashville to see the Titans work with the St. Louis Rams for two days, wondering what Young would do. I came with the same feelings I've had about him: Until he shows he can play like a conventional quarterback he's never going to get to an elite level, despite the slobber of other media members on his shoes.

I left drooling, too -- but not for the same reasons.

Young put on a passing display in the two practices I saw against the Rams that made him look like a different player. In the morning workout, he completed 22 of 26 passes and then followed that up by hitting nine in a row in the afternoon workout.

What?

Really?

Vince is... throwing accurately?

Did I step into some weird, Twilight Zone-like universe after I got back from lunch at the burrito stand? Is this Bizarro World? Is up down? Is black white? Is the dollar stronger than the Euro? What's going on? How can this be?

This camp has been different. Although he got off to a slow start, the practices against the Rams seemed to bring out the best in him.

"He's had his best camp by far," Fisher said. "The focus and the concentration is all there. It's about knowing where to go with the football."

...

Young is spending more time in the film room, doing more work on the mental side of things.

Wow. Dare I say it folks? The Titans may actually have a real quarterback in 2008.

Look, I personally never doubted Vince Young's talent. The guy is amazing, physically. But professional football is not college football. You actually have to know what you're going here with the big boys. Matching wits against Pete Carroll (a known idiot chased out of the NFL because he sucks) is not the same thing as matching wits with Tony Dungy. Hard work and dedication are vital to success in the pros. It now seems that Vince Young might have figured that out. It only took 3 years.

I actually think this is a good thing, folks. Please understand, I respect Vince Young's talent, but I'm not scared of the Titans. If the Colts can smack around Tom Brady on a consistent basis, an improved Vince Young does not intimidate me. Does it make beating the Titans harder? Yes, but there are no freebies in the NFL. The one thing we all stated Vince had to learn to do (throw accurately from the pocket) is exactly the thing the Titans are making him work on. So, all this crap we got from Titans and blindly loyal Longhorns fans about how the Titans need to let "Vince be Vince" was just typical, ignorant bile from people who don't know or understand football. Heck, I still get crap from Titans fans for simply stating the truth (check out these comments).

Prisco ends his column with a statement that reflects what we have trumpeted for two years:

It was the type of throw that great passers make. Young has always had the arm; nobody doubted that. It appears the work in the film room is what's about to pay off.

...

That could put a damper on some of the highlight-show stuff, which might anger those Vince Young worshipers who love it. But the reality is if he throws the ball anywhere near the way he threw it that day against the Rams, he will be on his way to possibly joining the elite of the league.

Maybe Vince has turned a corner. We'll see. Somehow, I doubt Titans fans will say "BBS was right" if Vince indeed becomes a good pocket passer.

1 recs | Comment 41 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

From PFP 08

On the Titans QBs last season
Kerry Collins was better than Vince Young in 2007. A lot better. He was better on first down (0.8% to -3.3% DVOA), better on second down (26.2% to -5.2%), and better on 3rd down (65.5% to -13.6%)

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine

(Yes, that is a non-Lil Wayne lyric sig).

My Blog

by shake n bake on Aug 12, 2008 5:43 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Young

It’s probably a moot point, because rumor has it that Vince is going to announce retirement again next week.

by drlove on Aug 12, 2008 5:44 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Coe

Word is he’s out for the season.

by BSanders37 on Aug 12, 2008 6:31 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Merrill Hoge, is that you?

The only reason the Titans lost the first game last year against the Colts was because of receiver Brandon Jones dropping a ball that hit him in the numbers to put the Titans in game-winning field goal range.

So, whether you dialed it in Week 17 or not, the Titans know how to play the Colts, and we will at the very least split our series this year.

by BeansCarter on Aug 12, 2008 7:00 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No

the Colts could have ended the game well before Young’s last gasp

by metal_militia on Aug 12, 2008 9:34 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

WTH!

It was a high pass and the “game winning field goal” was going to be 54 yards long. That is hardly a guarantee even in an indoor facility.

Besides your defense was playing well in that game. Vince Young SUCKED.

by MasterRWayne on Aug 13, 2008 1:27 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

54 in his sleep

Then what exactly was he doing on the 5 50+ yarders that he’s missed.

Career 7 for 12 from 50+

Pretty much the league average for 50+ yarders

from Advanced NFL Stats

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine

(Yes, that is a non-Lil Wayne lyric sig).

My Blog

by shake n bake on Aug 15, 2008 1:08 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you are going to use stats...

then use the correct ones. His career stats are not the relevant ones; his 2007 season stats are. Bironas had a pro-bowl year, and versus the two years prior, his accuracy went from 79% to 89%.

Last year, Bironas was 4-5 from 50+ yards.

So yeah, last year, Bironas would have made that kick in his sleep.

by BeansCarter on Aug 21, 2008 12:13 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think

Beans got his feelings hurt. Believe me, even with our reserves in, if Sorgi knew where the end zone was, we would have won that week 17 game.

I also blog at Speed Blue Nation

by Bullard47 on Aug 12, 2008 7:57 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wake up Bullard.

You lost the game. If Sorgi is the reason, then get another backup.

and the Colts have proven that despite their superior player talent on the field, they cannot out-gameplan the Titans.

by BeansCarter on Aug 21, 2008 12:09 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

About ESPN and other networks

I’m not sure if you’re watching the same things I am, but at the very least, there is equal amount of Vince-hating and people “drooling” over the guy. I’d argue there’s more of the former.

Seriously, I thought your content might be different at your own blog. Apparently not. I know that if PB spent a large part of his content trying to make himself feel better by bashing rival players with, dare I say, rather immature rants that preclude good debate, then I would not even bother to go to Burnt Orange Nation, the site of “blind” Longhorn fans. Certainly, poking fun at rivals is part of the game, and there’s nothing wrong with that, but your stuff seems to be a mix of good points scattered among personal venting and bad arguing.

You are certainly not the first person to call out Vince’s struggles. I think in many cases it’s legitimate, and it’s something that football fans can discuss. Such things can bring out other, more general issues such as traditional vs. dual threat QB’s, the impact of top receivers, the transition from a college team that doesn’t run a pro-style system to the NFL, etc. All very interesting things to talk about. However, your brand of making cases, if one could even call it that, is virtually useless. You run with conclusions with no logical fluidity and then claim some sort of victory over unseen opponents who, if they were to disagree anyway, would only represent Kool-Aid drinking morons who know less football than wise men who dislike Vince Young. I am impressed with the argumentation.

Really, are you truly under this delusion that you are the first person to claim Vince needs to improve from the pocket? Even the most die-hard VY fans will concede that. He’s not going to run 20 times in a game in the NFL. Everyone knows that. It’s pretty amusing that you think you will be proven “right” if and when Young becomes a competent pocket passer, when after all, such a thing would require hard work, dedication, and a bit of football IQ to do (which we all know is not the same as academic intelligence, and Vince is not trying to be a professor of philosophy). Yes, all Titans fans must bow down to Mr. BigBlueShoe for his enlightening analysis that Vince needs to be a better pocket passer to take his game to the next level. If so, they should also bow to a mirror, as well as to housewives who merely hear such armchair analysis from their husbands. Because they all will say the same thing. Of course, I love how you make sure you protect yourself if Vince does indeed improve his pocket presence. He’s stupid, lazy, and whiny, and he just sucks… but if he becomes good, see? You were right all along.

What an unfortunate blog. I would imagine fans who worship the likes of Manning and Dungy would be bit more classy and reasonable in their discourse.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 13, 2008 5:15 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

YYYYYYYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

I bet you think you are some intellectual powerhouse don’t you? Hey guys look at me, I can argue the passive subtle insulter because someone was talking shit about my shitty QB. horaayyyyyyyy

Get over yourself brother. Your little inane quip about this entire blog and the people here was uncalled for and just made you look like a tool in the process. But hey, if that’s how you want to roll, then by all means go for it. Enjoy another disappointing season with VY.

Go Colts!

by KingRichard on Aug 13, 2008 9:15 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Indeed, look at me

I demand good argument for proper discourse. How dare I do that?

Perhaps you are the one in need of “getting over yourself,” my friend (or should I say, “Your majesty,” to make yourself feel better), because if you read my criticisms closely, they are directed solely towards BigBlueShoe. My mentioning of the entire blog is because I feel it is “unfortunate” that he, as a main contributer, puts what amounts to personal crap on the main space, not that the whole lot of people here do the same. Of course, reading your response (as well as some of your other ones here), I can safely say he has attracted more of his own kind at least in one respect.

Is Vince “my” QB? I can forgive this, because I only clarified this to BBS on my response to him on MCM, but I’m not a Titans fan. I’m a Horns fan who follows Texas players in the NFL, and thus, while I cheer for Vince, I no longer have a personal stake in the matter of his success. His contributions to Texas are much appreciated and I’m a big fan of his, but if he ultimately does not work out in the NFL, it changes nothing about his college accomplishments in which I DO have a stake in. So again, I won’t hold this against you because I did not clarify this in my post. Nonetheless, my criticisms of BBS and his like (which again, apparently includes you) has more to do with his method of argument than it is his actual criticisms, a few of which are legitimate, which is something you would have caught if again, you were reading closely. But go ahead, resort to ad hominem arguments and ignore points being made. Hopefully, not all the regulars here do the same, or your interpretation of my post will be rather close to the truth indeed.

A big yawn here as well. It is tiring debating cogently with those who are unable to do so.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 13, 2008 11:31 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Your method of argument

is to make largely unsubstantiated, sweeping generalizations and not give specific examples. It’s difficult to rebut you because I’m not entirely sure what you’re even talking about. It reminds me of one of those papers I wrote in college when I hadn’t read the book, yet still needed to fill 5 pages. What results is a lot of generic philosophizing with very little practical information. And a C.

That said, a couple of things:

—You imply that on this blog BBS spends, “a large part of his content trying to make himself feel better by bashing rival players….” Again, I don’t think you’ve “read the book.” There are so many posts on this blog it’s difficult to keep up on a daily basis. In depth analyses of training camp, the roster, and the mechanics of the Colts offense and defense are just some of the incredible content on this blog. Every once in a while there is an unflattering post about a rival player. And every time that player’s supporters flood the site crying, “This is all you ever talk about! Why don’t you stick to your own team and shut up about everything else?” It’s as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning. These people don’t read the site on a regular basis and assume it’s all about bashing rivals. Nothing could be further from the truth. Nor is it simply a question of “poking fun.” Providing a critical analysis of the skills of our rivals gives the reader good insight into not only game matchups, but the quality of our divisional competition in general. Some may disagree with the analysis, and that is their right. Just as it is our right to make our own judgements about our rivals.

—There have been several discussions about VY on this blog. We have covered the “interesting things” you mention before. I don’t think it necessary to provide the totality of the VY content every time a relevant post is made. And I find it ironic that this post, backhanded compliment though it may be, has drawn such ire. As I read it, BBS is basically saying, “Hey this guy may turn into a good QB,” and VY supporters are basically saying, “Hey screw you!”

—Last, I don’t see anywhere in his post that BBS claims to be the only or first to point out VY’s flaws. In fact, he specifically mentions NFL scouts raising such issues before VY was even drafted. And while you may acknowledge that VY needs to improve his pocket passing skills to become a good NFL QB, there are many, many VY fans who will not hear of such a thing. I assume it is to these people that BBS directs such comments. You have figured out the obvious; congratulations. But know that many have not.

—OK, one more. I am always amused when a poster derides the lack of “class” on a sports blog. The word has been thrown around enough that it is virtually meaningless at this point. Howeverr, it occurs to me that if one did truly possess “class,” one would not point out that others lack it.

by ctnyc on Aug 13, 2008 12:21 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

reply

-My implication was that BBS spends an inordinate amount of time bashing VY, writing long columns that are essentially the same. Is that most of the content? Of course not. It’s still a large amount of time and space dedicated to one player. Indeed, his own words, “We’ve talked about ole Vince many times here at Stampede Blue, mainly because we enjoy being right.” Which roles right into the next point, which I think is obvious to most people who come to visit this blog: What he’s doing is not simple criticism. Criticism is fine, especially when it regards a rival player. However, making sweeping statements about VY for being dumb (for his wishy-washy explanation of his “retirement”), for being a whiner, and for being lazy have departed from actual football content into his personal opinion of Vince, which at best lack support. And really, Vince is dumb for his bad explanation? How many people have said one thing and tried to explain it away? I’m not defending him, nor am I calling him a genius; I’m merely pointing out how much of a leap it is to go from an unsatisfactory explanation of this overblown “retirement” talk to him being a retard. I find it an obvious logical flaw. Of course, he is entitled to his opinion, just as anyone is. That doesn’t mean it can’t be criticized itself.

-I would disagree that BBS is basically saying “VY may turn out good.” He’s basically lining up reasons why Vince has sucked, and will for the foreseeable future, by calling him stupid, lazy, and whiny, and also pointing out how he can’t run without getting killed and can’t throw with velocity or accuracy (hardly an analysis of Vince’s possible success). My assessment of his post is that in his harsh criticisms of VY, he is simply throwing the obligatory “But he’s such a talented athlete” stuff that will help him save face if and when Vince does become, at least in his eyes, a better pocket passer. I’d find it better if he flat out said which is obvious: That he believes VY is a draft bust. If VY turns out that way, then he got it right. If not, then he can just say he was wrong and that’s that. Sports matters can be tricky to predict, and he won’t be the first or last to be wrong about something (I’ve been wrong about plenty of things). So I simply don’t share your view on his post; you think he’s giving VY a chance, I think he’s saying the typical “great athlete” stuff in afterthought to avoid looking absolutely wrong if Vince succeeds.

-My rhetorical question to BBS was not to be literally taken as he was the first to think it up. Obviously he wasn’t. It’s just an expression for how unique he apparently thinks his analysis is: “Somehow, I doubt Titans fans will say ‘BBS was right’ if Vince indeed becomes a good pocket passer.” In any case, I agree that some Titans fans, at least for this upcoming season, seem to have unreasonable statistical expectations of Vince (something to the tune of 30+ TD’s), but in my experience talking with people who cheer and follow VY (obviously a lot in Austin), it’s not big news that Vince needs to improve in that area. The fact that people bring it up like it’s breaking news, on a constant basis, and and making it personal, gets a bit annoying.

-As far as me making sweeping generalizations, I will reiterate what I believed to be rather obvious logical flaws. I’ll also concede that since my post was not directed towards anyone but BBS, I assumed he knew about the things I and others pointed out elsewhere on MCM. For instance, his bad arguing would be ignoring questions such as “Who would you rather face: VY or Kerry Collins?” when he states that Collins is a better QB. He was called out for falsely saying Bob Sanders injured Vince’s quad when it was a pulled muscle instead. He said Vince was “getting killed” for trying to run so much, offering no evidence for this while others pointed out otherwise. Again, you did not know this information, so I understand how you might feel that I was making sweeping generalizations about BBS’s arguments. If you thought I was making generalizations about this blog, refer to my response to Mr. King. My response was to BBS alone, and I made no other conclusions on others until KingRichard showed up. However, I do feel that certain leaps of logic are obvious, such as the aforementioned leap to Vince’s stupidity to another leap stemming from an article about Vince being suspended for a preseason game meaning “laziness.”

-I would take your argument to mean, “Those that point out classlessness have no class.” Sorry, I don’t follow that reasoning at all. Again, I think few would consider it “classy” when seeing BBS’s posts here and his responses at MCM. This is just a simple observation. Ending his pieces with “But Vince is so talented” doesn’t change the fact he wrote a bunch of garbage just to create a spitting contest.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 13, 2008 4:19 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'll try to be brief

I think I see where you’re coming from, but disagree with almost everything you say.

- “Inordinate” is in the eye of the beholder. VY is the face of one of our biggest rivals and a very ubiquitous and polarizing player. Talking about him several times a year is not what I consider an inordinate amount of time. As for “dumb,” we’ve talked before on this site about that in regard to VY. The rationale is based on his poor Wonderlic score, stupid decisions made on the football field, and - yes—some of the situations he’s put himself in in public. He’s not the dumbest person ever; he’s not the only dumb guy in the world; but he sure has done some dumb things. And we’ve dutifully documented them here.

—Disagree with your entire 2nd paragraph. My take on BBS’ post is that he is basically saying, “You know this guy who sucks that we always trash here? Turns out he’s actually looking very good in training camp. He may turn out to be a real NFL QB after all. If he does, it’ll make the Titans better, but I’m still not worried about them.” He doesn’t annoint VY king, but he does quote some very positive comments from Pete Prisco and closes by saying “maybe Vince has turned a corner.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. Backhanded compliment perhaps, but not simply listing again why VY sucks as you imply.

—I can’t speak for BBS, but I doubt he thinks his position on VY is unique. And again, you may recognize VY’s weaknesses, and other reasonable people may recognize VY’s weaknesses, but there are many “kool aid drinkers” who come here shouting that VY is the greatest thing since sliced bread. After debating these types for long enough, one is bound to become a little more vociferous in one’s rebuttals. If BBS has repeated arguments, I’d guess it’s because many who come here steadfastly refuse to see what you and other reasonable people see: that VY has a lot of work to do to become a good NFL QB.

—About sweeping generalizations, I get you. And you’re right, I don’t know about the previous discussion on MCM, so it did look like your argument was unsubstantiated. I’ll check it out.

—I stand by my observation about “class.” And it really gets to what I’m talking about when I say that the word “class” has been thrown around so much it has become virtually meaningless in the context of a sports blog. In my experience, people with class do not resort to personal attacks. But calling somebody classless is a personal attack which has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Beautifully ironic, no?
(For the record, I don’t know you and am not trying to call you classless. I merely want to point out the irony of those who do throw the “c” word around).

by ctnyc on Aug 13, 2008 11:07 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ctnyc

I see our main point of difference seems to be our interpretation of BBS’s position. I think his “Vince is talented” stuff sounds disingenuous, but you do not. I guess that is where it ends.

Vince has indeed done some dumb things, and I’d never dream of defending it. I would point out that I think the Wonderlic is useless for predicting football success and he’s definitely not the dumbest guy in the NFL. Do I think Vince can learn NFL football? Yes. Do I think he can write me a good essay on the politics leading up to World War II? Heck no. Thus, just because he said something wishy-washy (you can find tons of players who’ve done that), that he did poorly on some test, and that he makes football mistakes that many other young QB’s make doesn’t make him a complete idiot.

Perhaps you are right; I should not be too quick to throwing around the word “classless” a lot, but surely it’s not a “class” thing to do, even if the person who does it is not necessarily classless, to cause such a spitting contest with a rival blog. I was not so much surprised with BBS’s actual arguments as I was with his tone. To me, and I think to a whole lot of people, it doesn’t sound like he’s particularly open to disagreement here, which is why people take exception.

At any rate, if it means anything, I was starting to get a very negative view of this blog until you showed up. Thanks for the reply. I’ll also give this about BBS: He obviously knows football, and I can respect the fact that he’s a rabid Colts fan. That’s fine. I would just hope that he would be, or at least sound like he would be, more open to discussion about things like straying from traditional pocket-quarterbacking and the like.

by TheElusiveShadow on Aug 14, 2008 4:04 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks

And as always, there’s nothing wrong with agreeing to disagree. Life would be pretty boring if we all agreed about everything all the time. You obviously put a lot of time and thought into your posts, and that is appreciated.

by ctnyc on Aug 15, 2008 4:53 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Big BS up to his old tricks

I finally decided to investigate BigBlueShoe’s points and see if the tape backed up what he says. Enjoy.

http://www.musiccitymiracles.com/2008/8/12/592565/response-to-bigblueshoe

BTW, Pete Prisco has been trashing Vince Young since the 2006 draft, claiming that Matt Leinart was by far the best QB that year. We don’t hear much from Pete these days about Leinart, but he is still trashing Vince in a desperate attempt to be ultimately judged “right” about his initial assessment. Sound familiar?

by NE Pumpkineaters on Aug 13, 2008 7:29 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually, the dollar has been rising against the Euro for the last few days.

Most financial folks think that the US market has priced in more risk than the other markets with about the same level of actual risk going forward, making the US a better bet long-term. Moreover, the rising dollar has sent oil plummeting, which has in turn fueled its rise (oil fundamentals are helping—this was a low-year for American drivers).

Which brings me to my point: you never know what’s gonna happen ‘til it does. You guys want to hog-tie VY as a guy who cannot grow into his role when your own QB’s little brother did just that thing last year. You act like it’s impossible, but it isn’t. Granted, Manning is still a BETTER QB, probably than anyone else in the League, but I’m not so sure he’s still surrounded by a better team, and if Bob Sanders goes down again… well, there are any number of contenders in the AFC South.

DannoE

Go read FRIDAY MAD SCIENCE at www.paperbackreader.com
Go Titans!

by DannoE on Aug 13, 2008 8:19 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ok, that was a retarded argument. You don’t think Manning has a good team surrounding him besides Bob Sanders? Are you serious? Seriously, are you serious?

Go Colts!

by KingRichard on Aug 13, 2008 9:11 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think he has a BETTER team surrounding him than either Garrard or Young.

“Good” is in the eye of the beholder. I’m sure the Colts are a GOOD team.

But BETTER is a relative, measurable term, and in this case, I think that the Colts this year are not better than they were last year. In fact, I think they are not as good as they were last year and that the other TEAMS may be better than they are now—especially if Sanders gets hurt. Without Sanders, that Colts Defense is gonna be meat in front of both the Jags’ and Titans’ power running games.

DannoE

Go read FRIDAY MAD SCIENCE at www.paperbackreader.com
Go Titans!

by DannoE on Aug 13, 2008 9:45 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How

Are the Colts worse off than last year? And how do you measure weather one NFL team is better than the other NFL team?

You make a statement more in hope than in knowledge when you say that these 2008 Colts are worse than they are last year? How so? Care to back up your argument?

We return 21/22 starters I believe, with the only loss coming from our right guard who defected like so many other Colt rejects (Minus Thornton, I sorta wish we could of kept him)

We also are returning the league’s DPOY, the league’s best pure passrusher, and the number one ranked pass defense.

Our young team is a year older, a year more experienced.

So tell me why we are not as good as last year, I simply don’t understand where you got such a notion from.

Peace

by furrycolt on Aug 13, 2008 8:31 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's called

“wishful thinking” furrycolt.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Aug 13, 2008 9:18 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Your team is a year older a year less deep.

Wait ‘til you see some injuries. Seriously. My point will bear itself out. Mark the thread, and we can come back to it.

Look, I root for UT, like Peyton, and generally like the Colts (though less than the Titans), but I think they have too much money tied up in D. Freeney where they should have been working on a more diversified D-Line. And behind Sanders there just isn’t much. So yeah, the Colts are a great team while the starters are on the field, but I don’t think they still have the thing that the Pats have made SO MUCH MONEY on, and that’s that quality back-up depth. They changed it a bit last year but more this year, and if there’s injury trouble, you’re really gonna see it.

DannoE

Go read FRIDAY MAD SCIENCE at www.paperbackreader.com
Go Titans!

by DannoE on Aug 14, 2008 8:16 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Colts were one of the youngest

and the most injured team in the league last year AND THEY STILL WENT 13-3 with the #1 scoring D.

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine

(Yes, that is a non-Lil Wayne lyric sig).

My Blog

by shake n bake on Aug 14, 2008 10:53 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Older?

Funny, we are one of the most youngest teams in the league second only to the packers. thanks for playing

by metal_militia on Aug 14, 2008 7:50 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ok

what if the Jags’ and Titans’ running backs get hurt. By Bob Sanders.

by beckmania on Aug 13, 2008 9:20 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Titans have FOUR quality RBs. Is Sanders gonna hurt all of them?

DannoE

Go read FRIDAY MAD SCIENCE at www.paperbackreader.com
Go Titans!

by DannoE on Aug 14, 2008 8:17 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

beckmania

Best. Response. Comment. EVER.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Aug 18, 2008 2:25 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

4?

Fat Lendale
Chris Henry
Chris Johnson
3 guys with between 0 and 9 career carries.

Quality?
Lendale and Henry averaged 3.7 and 3.8 yards per carry
Lendale ranked 33rd in DYAR and 34th in DVOA
Henry didn’t get enough carries to be ranked, but he was below replacement level, with a DVOA that would have put him at 40th out of 50 backs.
I loved Chris Johnson, but as a returnman, slot WR, change of pace guy.

The Titans had a run game from persistence not ability.
The Titans ranked 5th in rushing yards, but they were 1st in attempts. That put them at 15th in YPC and 13th in rushing DVOA.

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine

(Yes, that is a non-Lil Wayne lyric sig).

My Blog

by shake n bake on Aug 14, 2008 11:06 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They had a running game

Because they didn’t want to pass, something that their QB has a problem with

by furrycolt on Aug 16, 2008 9:25 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He's dead. Show some dignity.

DannoE

Go read FRIDAY MAD SCIENCE at www.paperbackreader.com
Go Titans!

by DannoE on Aug 14, 2008 8:17 AM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gocoltsskel3_small
"Why Pats fans, why?"
Cassieper_small
Stampede Blue is the #8 NFL Blog on Internet, #1 SB Nation Blog
Img_0229_small
Marv to Big D?
Stampedeblue_small
There is no blog war with 18to88
Img_0229_small
Good little story on Wheeler
Asobi2_small
Colts Games on iTunes
Cassieper_small
Multiple Sources: Favre is Already Inked
2073684986_s_small
smash and dash done?
Small
Without Vinatieri, Brady would have just 1 ring.
Nflj_10_small
Colts' Most Durable Players

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editor

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Shatner_small MasterRWayne

Contributing Writers

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Change_small Colts Homer

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports