Apparently, the Colts are indeed interested in Chris Simms (or so it seems)
by BigBlueShoe
on Aug 19, 2008 8:13 AM EDT
in Colts News
7 comments
Remember when I suggested the Colts should make a run at acquiring Chris Simms; that his arm strength and pedigree would made him ideal for the Colts offense? Well , apparently the Colts agree. Someone brought this to my attention (via the Fort Myers News-Press):
Scouts from 20 professional football teams watched from the Raymond James Stadium press box Sunday night as the Tampa Bay Buccaneers defeated the New England Patriots 27-10.
...
The Minnesota Vikings, Dallas Cowboys, Indianapolis Colts, Baltimore Ravens and Chicago Bears also could be looking to make upgrades at backup quarterback soon. All but the Bears sent scouts to Sunday’s game.
Sorry, but this is not a good sign if you are Jim Sorgi. If Indy were confident in their primary back-up QB, they would not have sent scouts to a Bucs game. Unless they were scouting potential players on defense the Bucs might cut (the Bucs run a hybrid-Cover 2), the Colts were there to watch Simms.
I think Simms is ideal for the Colts offense, and if Indy got him I'd feel a helluva lot better about the back-up QB job.
0 recs |
7 comments
Email
Print
Comments
Simms?
Did you happen to watch Simms against New England. He gets sacked every other play. I hope the Colts stay far away from him!
by Ayrshire on
Aug 19, 2008 10:03 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Granted I didn’t watch that game, but were defenders blowing through the line? Or was it just Simms allowing the pocket to collapse around him and get drilled? If it was the former, that isn’t his fault.
Go Colts!
by KingRichard on
Aug 19, 2008 12:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He doesn’t find receivers quickly enough. And, he’s not mobile enough to scramble effectively. There’s a reason he’s fourth on the Buc’s depth chart at QB….just my opinion.
by Ayrshire on
Aug 19, 2008 12:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
From his point
why would he sign with a team whose QB rarely misses a game and isn’t going to benched anytime soon whereas he could sign with us and probably be starting by Friday?
Being Who You Thought We Were Since 2005!
by WCG on
Aug 19, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Because
Our offensive line won’t get him killed. ;)
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on
Aug 19, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
If he still has dreams of being a starter, he probably won’t want to come to Indy. Simms might be a slight upgrade compared to several other team’s starting QB and have a chance of winning starting job.
by SeattleColt on
Aug 19, 2008 4:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Gray
If i had to choose between Simms, Sorgi, Lorenzen and Gray I would probably choose Gray. I dont know how mobile Simms s but I know Gray is mobile and mobility is the one thing missing from making Peyton superman. Gray seems pretty solid this preseason. The more he learns the offense the more he will get better. The most solid backup of the four choices.
Simms will have “The Carr Syndrome.” Having been sacked alot he is afraid to step in the pocket and deliver the ball.
Sorgi just doesnt have arm strength. I hate dump off passes.
Lorenzen is…well…Lorenzen. Cut him as QB and sign him as a D-Lineman.
Gray is a solid choice in my opinion.
by skywalker on
Aug 19, 2008 4:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
New FanPost
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
