Game Thoughts: Jaguars v. Colts
Losing this game is sickening for Colts fans. We won the game in every way but on the scoreboard and we let it slip away. Against what seems to be conventional wisdom on this board, the blunt of the blame should not be placed on the defense's shoulders. Bad offensive play calling, bad passes, an imbalanced attack and squandered opportunities on offense really took the air out of our balloon in this game. The defense allowed a lot of running yards but only 16 points in the game, 3 FGs and 1 TD. However, we allowed too many 3rd down conversions which I will cover and we simply HAVE TO learn how to substitute fresh players in during the game when our D is on the field for the amount of time they were in this game.
Peyton Manning - Peyton is not yet back to his true form. His accuracy is off, throwing the ball into the ground, behind receivers on crossing patterns, short on deep passes or long and about 1/3 he hits right on target. I don't know the exact reason for this, some blame can be on feeling pressure but there's something still not right with Peyton and it has been hurting us a lot this year.
Receivers - We have had a problem dropping passes so far this year. Reggie more than anyone else has been dropping too many passes. Something needs to be fixed here because if Manning is struggling with accuracy we have to make catches when they are on target. We've been inconsistent in that effort and it's cost us points.
Offensive Line - How much do you love Jeff Saturday? This guy is a Hall of Famer in my opinion, the difference he makes on the line is astounding and I truly believe that when Lilja returns we'll have one of the strongest interior offensive lines in the league. They played much better in this game allowing Peyton to look down the field more often and, had he taken better advantage of those opportunities, would have been seen as heroes in the game.
Anthony Gonzalez/Dallas Clark - These two have played their hearts out this year. I love Gonzo and Clark and how tough they play. Its unfortunate they were not targeted more after the first quarter.
Mike Hart - Why do we not give this kid a chance to make a play? Rhodes and Addai both played really well but I still just don't get it.
Tim Jennings - Tim Jennings made great special teams plays and good tackles with the ball in front of him on the ground. However, we have Tim Jennings in the game to be a "cover corner," that is his MO. Somehow, however, he is targeted TIME AND TIME AGAIN on 3rd down and long and gives up a yard more than is needed for the opposing offense to get a first down. I AM TIRED OF SEEING HIM PLAY WITH A CUSHION SO LARGE THAT IT INVITES OPPONENTS TO HAVE A FREE FIRST DOWN, COMPLIMENTS OF TIM JENNINGS. Either Jennings truly is a cover corner and starts playing tight like a cover corner is supposed to or it is time for him to allow someone else to have a shot. How about Hughes or Ratliff? I'm done watching it.
Defensive Substitutions - WHERE ARE THEY? Last I checked most of us feel confident in our depth at most positions on the field, on offense and defense. Outside of DT, which is still an unkown to this point, we have good back-up LBs, Corners and safeties. Additionally, we have two guys who I am unsure have played a down this year in Curtis Johnson and Marcus Howard who have real promise and can give our DEs a bit of a break. WHY DO WE NOT DO SO? Curtis Johnson has shown the kind of tenacity I see as being extremely valuable when other guys are tired. Jordan Senn showed real competence against the run at LB and Philip Wheeler/Buster Davis must not be slouches or I don't see how a good player like Kyle Shotwell can get cut and Minnesota, the best run defense in the league, can snatch him up so quickly. In Bullitt and Giordano we have solid Safety depth and they got into the game but it seems like they're the only ones we trust to give guys a breather. Dante Hughes has shown real ability in his short career with the Colts but gets few opportunities to give Jennings or another CB a breather. I just don't get why we let a light defense which is known for its speed get beat up by a much larger and more physical offense for 20 minutes without giving guys a breather. It's absurd and has to change.
Offensive play calling - HAS BEEN HORRIBLE. "We've not been able to establish the run." That was our mantra coming into this game which explained why our offense struggled to get things going and be as explosive as we've seen it in the past. In this game, we did establish the run, early and we were successful with it. It opened up the offense and spread out the defense to allow Peyton and Co. more opportunities to go deep and make big offensive plays. However, after Manning overthrows, underthrows, or simply misses his receivers... after we don't have the ball for more than 12 min. we abandon the running game with only one short run to the left (4 yards) and then two straight passing plays... the last of which is underthrown and picked. The defense is forced back on the field tired and still holds the Jags to a FG. The offense comes back on the field and Peyton "works his magic" which is great... it was a beautiful drive. But that drive doesn't "forgive all" as some on this board seem to believe. The offense sucked, Peyton tried to bail us out and did a great job on that series but the offense's putrid performance for much of the game forced the defense's back against the wall. The defense gets a crappy PI call against them (BOGUS) and the Jags sneak out with a LONG 51 yard FG to win it.
The defense does not deserve any rewards for a GREAT DEFENSIVE PERFORMANCE... however, they did their job really well considering the circumstances. If the Colts offense can't outscore their opponents 16 points, we'll be in trouble. Oh and it was interesting to note that when we brought some bulk inside on the DL we stopped yielding long runs up the gut... thought I'd mention that.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
The difference
What would have guaranteed a victory would have been some run plays once we got it in close to the end zone on that last drive and leave the Jags with either no TOs or little time on the clock. Even just one run play per set of downs would have whittled the clock down to under 20 seconds, and then the Jags have to make a big passing play to win, and that wouldn’t happen.
I also blog at Speed Blue Nation
by Bullard47 on Sep 21, 2008 9:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The O could have been better
and deserve some blame, but they only got 19 minutes of possession time vs 41 for the Jags. The D didn’t give the O enough opportunities. The Colts never run enough for most of our tastes, so it’s not any different from any other Colts game.
"I'm not racin', I'm just sprintin'
Cuz I don't wanna finish
they diminish, I replenish"
-Lil Wayne "Let the beat build"
by shake n bake on Sep 21, 2008 10:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I obviously have done a poor job of expressing my disdain for the defensive performance in this game. Allowing the rushing yards we have allowed to this point in the year and the yards we allowed in this game is not something to be proud of or something worthy of “defending.” However, ball control works two ways, ask the Jags. The Jags grinded out first downs. That was their game plan from the start. We need to get first downs as much as possible in order to keep Peyton and the Colts offense off of the field. What was the Colts offensive game plan?
Anyone?
It appears as though our game plan for much of the game was to score quickly or punt. Which means, if we are unable to convert on long passes, unable to make catches or turn the ball over on offense, we play into the Jags “T of P” game plan.
Had the Colts sustained offensive drives by balancing the offensive attack with runs and passes, utilizing a running game that was succeeding throughout the entire game, we keep our defensive unit off of the field longer (allow them to rest) and force the Jags defense to stay on the field longer (wear them down). Instead, we chose the former strategy of push the ball up the field early and often and failed in doing so a majority of the time.
Can you honestly not see how important the turnover was after our defensive INT? Do you realize how significantly different the game would have turned out with a different offensive game plan? Instead of throwing long to Harrison (he was open but underthrown), we could have taken our great field position (credit to the defense for it) and moved the ball down the field with a steadier and more sustained drive, ending it with a score (likely a TD), and putting the Jags offense in a position to SCORE or “die” so to speak with a lot of time remaining in the fourth. Instead, we turn the ball over, allow them to stick with their “grind it out” offensive game plan, and give up a FG, placing our backs against a wall, forcing us to score a TD as quickly, allowing the Jags another chance to win the game.
That offensive possession in particular was the most important possession in the game and had it not be so poorly mishandled, had we not failed so miserably, the outcome of the game would reverse. Instead, we bailed out the Jags, allowed them to stick to their game plan and put a tired defense back on the field.
The defense? Lousy. Too many first downs allowed on third and long. Way too many rushing yards surrendered. Lousy management of substitutions to keep guys fresh. Lousy tackling for much of the game. Lousy.
The fact still remains, the offensive turnover killed the game. So… am I “blaming the offense?” I think more responsibliity lies on their shoulders, yes. Am I giving the defense a “pass” no. I simply stated that the points surrendered by our defense was respectable and that a different offensive game plan or play calling would have resulted in a different outcome. That’s how I feel about it and I feel that our offense has been a HUGE contributor to our lousy defensive performances.
Our defense is made to 1) play with the lead and 2) not allow big plays. For much of the second half, the majority of the time the defense spent on the field, they limited big plays (lots of yards) and held the Jags to FGs. The defense took a stand on the Jags initial long drive and handed the ball back to our offense and it failed. Then the tired D took the field and had to do the same. They limited the Jags to a FG. Our offense scores but leaves over a minute on the clock. The Jags are forced to a 4th down and fail to convert… but wait a bogus call on KO for PI breaths life into the Jags. They get far enough down the field to attempt a FG. They hit a 51 yard FG to win. Defense… shame shame. Offense… shame shame more. That’s all I’m saying.
by bamock on Sep 22, 2008 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Offensive game plan all game every game
score quickly and score often, make the other team pass. The offense is built to move the ball through the air and move it fast. The OL is smaller than most and not meant for long grinding drives. They aren’t maulers, as much as some people hate it the Colts are built and suited for finesse play.
"I'm not racin', I'm just sprintin'
Cuz I don't wanna finish
they diminish, I replenish"
-Lil Wayne "Let the beat build"
by shake n bake on Sep 22, 2008 1:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree about our offense and how the offense didn’t run the ball enough. I thought Manning became too pass happy whenever the Colts got those two good field positions after the bad kickoff that went out of bounce and then the Hayden interception. I believe one of the interceptions by Manning was on a first down after we just ran effectively the two plays before. So not getting any points with those possessions alone was a killer. However, I thought you didn’t critique our D enough. They could not get off the field on third dows and obviously couldn’t stop the run knowing the Jags were going to run the ball. The second half TOP was around 26 to 4 favoring the Jags. At one point they had the ball for over 12 minutes in the 4th quarter which is really really embarrassing. No way should any team be close on a winning a football game with that stat, but somehow the Colts did which makes this loss evening more frustrating.
by ColtsFanNChiTown on Sep 21, 2008 10:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah
We got tore up on third downs by MATT FRICKING JONES. He of the coke-snorting fame. He loved that 10 yard cushion Tim Jennings gave him every snap.
I also blog at Speed Blue Nation
by Bullard47 on Sep 22, 2008 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
D sucked.
We don’t deserve a win with that kind of play.
by coltsfanawalt on Sep 21, 2008 11:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah
And this stat: 0 sacks.
I also blog at Speed Blue Nation
by Bullard47 on Sep 22, 2008 12:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely right
Unless I’m mistaken, Garrard was never sacked. All the guys Polian drafted at DE this last draft have yet to contribute.
The D line collectively is awful; no run stuffing OR pass rush.
by N Colter on Sep 22, 2008 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair
Dungy isn’t exactly rotating at the DE position the way we all assumed he would. I haven’t actually seen Howard or Johnson in on a snap yet.
I also blog at Speed Blue Nation
by Bullard47 on Sep 22, 2008 1:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or...
Senn, Davis, Wheeler, Hughes is rare… if not for Sanders injury you’d not see Giordano or Bullitt getting any time either. We field these guys for a reason I would assume, and it isn’t just to play ST and sit on the bench while our starters are crawling in exhaustion.
by bamock on Sep 22, 2008 3:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't believe it
I just don’t think the Colts had the ball often enough for the offense to be blamed. It was a typical Colts Jacksonville game. You say the Jags grinded every set of downs out, that’s how they play, they can’t play no different. The Jags have the same gameplan every game, and that’s run and play defense. Goes well against a team like the Colts who want to score and score often, which is usually quickly because we are so talented. But we are not as dominate as to say ever drive is gonna be 10+ plays. We take what we can, and the Jags certainly didn’t give us a lot. They ran and kept the ball as long as possible. When you’re playing from behind your number one priority is to score and take the lead, then to worry about time management. The Jags are a good team, I’m positive they won 10+ games last year, and were expected to challenge us for the division. Too much is being looked at that we didn’t do what we wanted and not enough looked at the Jags did what they wanted.
by Scooty4422 on Sep 22, 2008 4:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























