NFL fines Freeney $20,000 for postgame comments about officials
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d80e044e3&template=with-video-with-comments&confirm=true
"The NFL has fined Colts defensive end Dwight Freeney $20,000 for comments he made after last Saturday's 23-17 overtime loss at San Diego. The league announced the fine Friday.In a postgame interview with Yahoo! Sports, Freeney used two expletives in criticizing the officiating at the end of the game. The Colts were called for three defensive penalties on the Chargers' winning drive in overtime."
Did he get fined for using expletives or for criticizing the officiating? Because I know a lot of people who woule owe some big buck about that game if we all got held to that standard.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
Well, we all knew it was coming but that doesn’t make it any less stupid. Maybe the league should work on fixing their shitty officiating instead of fining players, you know the guys who invest their time and bodies for this sport, for being emotional about their job.
by KingRichard on Jan 12, 2009 6:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
right
It’s not a surprise at all but once again we see the league choosing to fine a player an insignificant amount of money (to him, not me of course) instead of working on fixing the problem. We had plenty of other opportunities to win the game, but the way overtime played out was still horseshit and Freeney shouldn’t get fined for stating the truth.
by psvirsky on Jan 12, 2009 7:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You know what's funny
They used his use of expletives to justify it, they’re not saying he was wrong.
by monstersbox on Jan 12, 2009 8:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
justify the fine
that way they can justify the fine…. it was about being abusive not about telling the truth about how bad the officiating is. Probably took them this long to figure out how to word it so it wasn’t open to being appealed.
If the sport has such a problem with criticism of their referees you think they would try to fix the problem rather than muzzle the complaints.
An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...
by bluegirl on Jan 12, 2009 9:15 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It's a form of censorship
You can’t tell him not to say it, especially if he has a point and it’s true because this is the USA. Besides, I promise you he’d do it again. If one of the officials smelled god awful and Freeney said “That dude smelled seriously [expetive] awful.” he’d just be stating facts.
I for one am not saying it wasn’t the sole reason for the loss, but come on. Walks like a duck…
by monstersbox on Jan 12, 2009 11:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry but....
This is one of my pet peeves. If you work for someone, especially under a highly regulated contract, THEY make the rules – and you agree to follow them when you sign on the dotted line. It is not censorship, censorship is only done by the government. If you come to my house and say my furniture is ugly, and I kick you out, it isn’t censorship.
I am surprised that Freeney went all out like that, but I understand his frustration. He will either pay the fine or if he thinks that within the terms of the CBA he was wrongly fined, he will appeal. I’m not a CBA lawyer, so I don’t know what exactly crossed the line.
That is not to say that I agree that it is in the league’s best interest to “hush” those who question the ability or integrity of the officials, but it is their right to do so if such an action is permitted in the CBA. I honestly think the commissioner should take a look at these policies and consider implementing rules that allow problems with officiating to be communicated publicly.
I also wish I had time and motivation to blog at Speed Blue Nation
by Bullard47 on Jan 12, 2009 4:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here you go
For those of you that don’t understand what the word censor means…
cen⋅sor /ˈsɛnsər/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sen-ser] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds.
2. any person who supervises the manners or morality of others.
3. an adverse critic; faultfinder.
So uh, yeah, that’s censorship. Censorship is not opression. Censorship is not a crime and is done regularly on television and radio by the FCC. I responded to a question “How can you justify the fine” and I said censorship. Under the definition of censorship, that’s exactly what it is. A person has freedom of speech in this country but their employer has the right to fine them or reprimand them for what they do. Trust me, I was in the military and understand what censoring means.
by monstersbox on Jan 12, 2009 6:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was probably worth it to him.
He knew he would be fined and wanted to be heard.
Czar Gooddell (sp) really needs to get a grip on reality.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Jan 12, 2009 11:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts
I think that this year, bar none, has been the absolute worst year for officiating for as far back as I can remember, possibly ever. It all started with the Hochuli debacle and continues through the playoffs. Something needs to be done.
Check it to Pancakes! Pancakes!
by Picky on Jan 12, 2009 12:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What do you expect?
When all the officials get for screwing up so bad they still officiate in the playoffs? I’ve already said how Hochuli is my favorite ref, and I have no problems with him getting a chance to officiate in the playoffs, but they receive absolutely no ramifications for their actions on the field. Winters was banned from officiating the Giants for 3 years for bad calls. Funny thing was, the calls were holding. And what happens if an official doesn’t move out of the way or completely screws up a play? It’s not that rare, but sometimes it’s blatant and on an important play. What happens? Nothing. Can’t review it or mention it. For some reason officials are held to an “above the law” type mentality. If an “official” in any other aspect of life failed as miserably as some of these guys have, they’d be fired and/or have legal situations. I’m not saying it to take it to that degree, but the serious backlash from the league on these matters only justifies and makes the the situation worse. Think about it, it’s a catch 22. If they don’t recognize Freeney insulted officiating then they legitimize it, but then they cite him for using foul language while doing it for the reason for the fine. They didn’t say what he said was wrong, but the fine was for foul language when referring to officiating. And now that fine will be on record and if Winters screws up again or another official, somebody will say “Well, Freeney was fined in the 2008 playoffs blah blah blah.” They’re really not hurting this man’s ability to eat, and they’re not trying to put out the fire.
And you’re right about officiating getting worse. All these new rules to make calls black and white and take the subjectivity out of calling plays and penalties have only introduced much more subjectivity into the game. I don’t even know what a catch is anymore. I don’t know what illegal use of the hands to the face or holding is anymore. Apparently balls don’t have to cross the goal line to be TDs anymore and it’s only about your feet. And I had the site for the non called intentional grounding against Rivers, and he did one last night against the Steelers but I guess after he flipped out on the safety from one, he’s exempt from the rule.
by monstersbox on Jan 12, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and pass interference
Is one of the most inconsistent calls out there too…. watching the games this weekend without a basis for the colts, the refs were still pissing me off on both sides of the ball. Until the refs are willing to be full time employees – at least during the season- these weekend warriors will continue to screw up. Why should professional athlete’s where one game can turn a season have to put up with part time referees?
An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...
by bluegirl on Jan 12, 2009 2:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
The poor officiating hasn’t only been in Colts’ games. Its been across the board.
Between these officials and the inundation of commercial breaks, I have had difficulty even watching football this year. It’s really sad.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Jan 12, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'm feeling kinda Sunday about that comment
It’s just the beginning of our happy-go-fun-day
by LovinBlue on Jan 12, 2009 3:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
you crack me up!
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Jan 12, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















