Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

2008 Season: The Officiating

It was pretty obvious that the 2008 season featured some of the worst officiating in recent memory. From Ed Hochuli's blowing the call on the Jay Cutler fumble in Week 2 to Ron Winter's crew embarrassing the NFL in OT by handing first downs to the Chargers; all around, a horrible officiating year. I focus on officials today because, some five days after the Colts lost to the Chargers, media are still complaining about Ron Winter's crew and how the called the OT period.

For the Colts in particular, officials have really screwed them out of a couple of victories this year. Against the Jaguars in Week 3, Freddie Keiaho was called for a bogus pass interference call that helped the Jaguars win in Indy. Now, after the fallout of the Chargers loss, I think it is pretty safe to say the Colts were screwed by the refs this year.

Look, I have no problem with Winter and his crew calling the Clint Session facemask, the Eric Foster hold, or the Tim Jennings hold in OT. No problem at all. However, that kind of stuff was going on ALL. NIGHT. LONG. And much of the facemasking and holding was being done by the Chargers. Even PhilB saw it. On the now infamous 3rd and 2, Dallas Clark was held. Manning had to pull down the ball, and the result was a sack. Holding like this was routine for the Chargers. Yet, for the game, they had 3 flags called against them.

3 friggin flags.

And if Winters is going to call the Clint Session facemask (which was a correct call, imho), then he should have thrown the flag on #61 of the Chargers. Why? Because he was grabbing Clint's facemask as well.

2mbs5j_medium

As you can see, either no flag should have been thrown, or two facemask penalties thrown, and have them off-set.

 

And while we are on the subject of facemask, Chargers offensive linemen where grabbing and pulling on Dwight Freeney's all night. They couldn't block him. So, they did anything and everything to slow him down. Sadly, the refs decided to be selective with enforcing the rules:

2vlw86x_medium

Under the new NFL rules, that's a 15 yard facemask right there. Sadly, no call. in fact, no calls all night long. Ron Winter = douchebag

 

The Jennings hold is the one Winters and the NFL are getting roasted on, but as you can see there were plenty of blown calls all throughout the game.

Listen, I have absolutely no problem with refs calling penalties like the ones Winters and his crew called in OT. Holding is holding, whether in the first minute of a game, or in OT. My beef is the refs were not calling these things all evening. Then in OT, for seemingly no reason whatever, they are throwing flags.

Why?

The answer is simple: The NFL and NBC wanted the game over with. The game was approaching midnight Eastern time, and if San Diego hadn't won it on the first drive, NBC would have had to shell out more money to continue broadcasting the game. It would have likely meant free commercial time, and additional pay for the TV crew. So, Winters and his gang decided to, essentially, end the game by throwing flags. I have no proof that this was the reasoning. It is the only logical sense I can make out of Winters deciding to get flag happy in OT.

Where the calls legit? Yes. Where they appropriate? Absolutely not. This isn't about calling the game correctly. This was about:

71014_moneyhappiness_vl-vertical_medium

Photo: blog.bioethics.net

 

By the way, this game was officiated by the same Ron Winters who was banned from officiating Giants games for his screw-up in the 2003 playoffs. Why this asshead is still officiating, let alone still officiating playoff games, I don't know.

I don't blame the rules for the Colts losing in OT to the Chargers. I don't blame the OT rules or the way the NFL does "sudden death "scoring. What I do blame is incompetence and plain and simple greed. That, I blame. And that's what happened here. I simply cannot help but feel my team got hosed. I cannot remember any other game where the refs did such a screw job to a team our guys were facing.

I guess the game was good in that it highlighted the incompetence of several NFL refs. Mike Pereira has tried all season to explain his officials' screw-ups, and just like every other week, he comes off looking like a douche when explaining the abortion that was the Colts v. Chargers game. The league needs to ditch these lawyers who do this as a part-time job and hire real, professional referees who do this year round.

I don't want to take anything away from the Chargers. They played well enough to win. But, then again, so did the Colts. The difference was the officiating. And that really, really sucks.

[UPDATE] This is from an article by Rick Gosselin, one of the more respected national media writers out there. He wrote this back on December 16th:

The TV networks, who bankroll the NFL, don't like it when the games spill over that three-hour time slot they are allotted in the schedule. And if the networks don't like something, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell doesn't like something.

...

How do the officials speed up games, you ask? Simple: Don't call penalties. Keep those yellow hankies in your pocket. Thirteen of the 16 games last weekend had 10 penalties or fewer assessed, another season low. Five teams were flagged for a single penalty.

Gosselin goes on to say that Winter and his crew threw the most flags of any group of officials in the league. Prior to overtime against the Chargers, only nine penalties were called in four quarters of play. In overtime, with the prime time game spilling over past three hours, Winters and his crew threw three flags. Each flag thrown awarded SD with a new set of downs, with two thrown on key 3rd down plays. These flags kept SD's drive going, and ultimately helped them win.

Again, I'm not writing this to churn up some "grand conspiracy." This isn't a conspiracy at all. Al NFL people know that refs do things to end games. I just don't think they feel comfortable letting the fans know this, even though it happens pretty regularly.

Also, Dwight Freeney was pissed as hell at the officiating. Yahoo's Mike Silver thinks he has a point:

As one of the NFL’s best pass rushers of his generation, the Colts’ Dwight Freeney believes that he is held by opposing pass blockers "every single damn play." Let that serve as a backdrop to the utter disgust the Pro Bowl defensive end displayed as we walked to Indy’s team bus outside Qualcomm on Saturday night over the trio of penalties called against the Colts’ defense that helped facilitate San Diego’s winning touchdown drive in overtime. The rundown: Second-and-4 from the San Diego 43 – Sproles is stopped for no gain, but Eric Foster is called for defensive holding. Third-and-8 from the Indy 40 – Rivers throws incomplete to Chris Chambers, but cornerback Tim Jennings, who helped break up the pass, is called for defensive holding. Next play, first-and-10 at the Colts’ 35 – Sproles is stopped for no gain, but Session, who made the tackle, is whistled for a 15-yard facemask penalty. In my opinion it could be argued that any of the three penalties was justified, and a case could be made that each was unwarranted. But to have all three of them called in that context was regrettable, and the fact that the Chargers were only penalized three times all game (and only once on offense, for an ineligible man downfield) makes it even worse. In Freeney’s opinion, the flurry of calls that helped end his season was flat-out unconscionable. "Those were the worst [expletive] calls I’ve seen in a long time," he said. "To have a game of that magnitude taken out of your hands, it’s just disgusting. It’s not like they made one [expletive] bad call – it’s three calls, in overtime. On one the ball’s 50 feet over [Chambers’] head. And they have the nerve to call defensive holding? When they can’t even call one friggin’ offensive holding the whole game? What’s going on? They need to start investigating some other [expletive]."

0 recs  |  Comment 187 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

ridiculous bbs

you actually think that nbc wanted to save money and stop an overtime nfl playoff game. the ratings are peaking in the fourth quarter and into overtime.
and they would obviously have no power to “end the game” even if that was somehow their stance.

the difference in the game was not the officiating. it was mike scifers and the colts inability to run the ball and stop sproles. don’t forget gijon robinsons whiff on 3rd and 2 with a chance to put the nail in the coffin.

delusional fans use officiating as an excuse. if you haven’t gone back and dissected every play of the game to see what penalties were and were not called you can’t rationally make that point.

http://www.irun.com/users/6967/downloads/Jays%20Win%20Back-to-Back%20World%20Series.mp3

by torontocoltsfan on Jan 8, 2009 10:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

If you don't think poor officiating is somewhat related to money, you're wrong.

There may not have been a conspiracy involving NBC, but the reason the NFL keeps making more and more calls judgement calls is because instead of removing 6 minutes of commercials for every scoring drive, they’d rather speed up the game by removing penalties. They’re more concerned with a well commercialed game than a well-officiated one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Makes no sense

The rating for Saturday night’s game PEAKED during OT, so NBC had zero incentive to stop the game. The longer the game went on, the higher the rating and this would affect future ad rates.

This is not to say there weren’t some bad calls, but none of these were designed to end the game so NBC could go back to regular programming (which gets almost no rating that late on a holiday weekend).

by JTBLA on Jan 8, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Trust me

They want to speed up the games. They’ve come out and said this. They want to make games go faster, so they’ve changed the way certain penalties, including offensive holding, are called. I’m just making this up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't buy the conspriacy, but the refs did screw up

they tightened up and didn’t call OT the way they called the first 4 quarters.

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

One thing no one is mentioning re: winters (well, two things)

People keep saying, ‘well, you should expect a high number of flags when he’s your ref!’… okay, but the Chargers only got 3, below their season average. In the Green Bay game, the Colts got way above their season average and the Packers got way below their season average.

So, what I’m supposed to believe is, that in games where Ron Winters officiates, Colts opponents suddenly find God and Colts players wet themselves with nerves?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It certainly feels that way.

The more I think about this game, the more upset I become. For numerous reasons, not just the officiating.

One thing was why didn’t Dungy throw the challenge flag on that play at the 2:00 mark – the Chargers receiver clearly didn’t have both feet in and Dungy had the 2:00 warning to make sure. I suppose he wanted to save a challenge for the second half. Yet…we lost that game with the challenge still in his pocket.

Another was why didn’t Peyton go to hard count? The Chargers D was changing their formation once the play clock got down to 10 seconds – everybody in the world knows Peyton goes down to 1 or 2 seconds on the clock. The ONE time he burned them was when the ball was snapped at 12 seconds. That worked, why not keep doing it? Or at least switch it up.

This game was frustrating on so many levels. We should have won. We should have won. I don’t want to be talking about the draft yet! Crap!

Oh well, yet ANOTHER year to live in So Cal and listen about how my team lost the the Chargers – by bandwagon Charger fans no less. These people are incredible. Its amazing how many of them are fans now, when a month or so ago they didn’t even know who the Chargers were playing. Nimrods.

rant over.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t think Dungy’s non-challenge was that bad, and I said it when it happened. That one play sure didn’t sway the outcome of the game as bad as the horrible penalties.

by KingRichard on Jan 8, 2009 11:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At the time, I understood why he didn't.

But I was torn, because that catch put them at least in field goal range. Hindsight begin 20/20 and all I look back now and think we could have stopped them on that drive and there wouldn’t have been an OT.

I’m not blaming Dungy or Peyton…I am much more comfortable blaming the refs because they were horrible. Seriously, there were alot of things that just didn’t go our way…

I didn’t notice all of the facemasks on Freeney and Session during the game either. Now I am really pissed off. If there is a God, San Diego will go down in flames this weekend.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well according to "god" (speaking through KSK writer Unslient Majority)

He made the Colts lose because Dungy is stealing his thunder by being such a nice, devout guy.

http://kissingsuzykolber.uproxx.com/2009/01/god-explains-the-wild-card-round.html

(the link is profane and offensive to many, but it’s KSK so you should already know that)

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

HOLY SHIT ON A STICK, I never even noticed Session being facemasked as well. Nice job Winters you prick.

by KingRichard on Jan 8, 2009 11:02 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

The more I keep thinking about the game, and look at the pictures, I’m getting more and more angry. Man this is just bullshit. Why of all nights and of all games did that loser have to be the ref. sigh

by KingRichard on Jan 8, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe we'll get an apology letter from the NFL

just like the Giants did in ’03…BASTAHDS.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

small consolation if you do get one

Remember the 2006-07 AFC Championship game against the Patriots? Ellis Hobbs got called for pass interference on Reggie Wayne, spectacularly preventing him from making a 19-yard touchdown catch. Referee Bill Carollo called pass interference, and Phil Simms, claiming “face-guarding”, said it was a penalty because even though the replay showed Hobbs never touched Wayne, he had his hands in front of his face.

Unfortunately for the Patriots, what neither Phil Simms nor the referee knew, was that there is no such thing as “face guarding” in the NFL. All those rules only come into play if there is contact with the receiver, which the replay clearly showed there was none.

What did the Patriots get besides a big loss? A nice apology letter from the NFL, saying they made a mistake. Fat lot of good it does after the fact.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jan 8, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That was revenge

For the fiasco at Foxboro in 2003. ;)

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oh, that.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

nbc controls officiating crews?

stupid in so many ways. probably top ten on the “dumb things bbs has ever written” list, and that is one hell of a competitive list.

how about this: ron winter isn’t a very good official, and did exactly what not very good officials do, he missed some calls. too obvious?

also, that still picture you have up there of the face mask is nice and all, but if you actually watch the replay on nfl.com, it’s really obvious the guy never grabbed session’s face mask, where as session has a handful of facemask for almost the entire duration of the tackle. you can even see briefly where sproles entire body moves in the direction that his facemask is being pulled before he goes down.

the mvp of the nfl had the ball with 3 minutes to go and a three point lead and couldn’t do anything with it against a mediocre at best chargers defense. what did nbc and the refs have to do with that?

The Official Enforcer of MCM

by hal41605 on Jan 8, 2009 11:44 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Under NFL rules

Touching or grabbing the facemask is a 15 yard penalty.

Also, the MVP of the league tried to throw the blal to his TE, who was held on the play (no flag)/ Result = sack, and a punt.

Also, the MVP of the league has a Super Bowl ring. your team doesn’t. Come back when you get a clue, Hal.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

God, it makes my day to prove you wrong man. Keep up the ______ work!

From the NFL Rulebook:

15 Yards
Chop block.
Clipping below the waist.
Fair catch interference.
Illegal crackback block by offense.
Piling on.
Roughing the kicker.
Roughing the passer.
Twisting, turning, or pulling an opponent by the facemask.
Unnecessary roughness.
Unsportsmanlike conduct.
Delay of game at start of either half.
Illegal low block.
A tackler using his helmet to butt, spear, or ram an opponent.
Any player who uses the top of his helmet unnecessarily.
A punter, placekicker, or holder who simulates being roughed by a defensive player.
Leaping.
Leverage.
Any player who removes his helmet after a play while on the field.
Taunting.

From the NFL Rule Book

Stompin' your Terrible Towel and still hatin' Music City Miracles!

by gramsey712 on Jan 8, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude seriously

They called face mask penalties all year for dudes just grabbing the thing. “Twisting, turning, or pulling” is a load of BS. If the grab the mask, 15 yards. Rule book don’t mean shit.

Seriously, your team is still in the playoffs. WTF are you doing here? I mean, i don’t mind having Titans fans here.I enjoy the comedy. But, if my team were playing for the right to go to the AFCCG, I wouldn’t be hanging out at MCM.

I guess that’s the difference between fans who have experienced winning football… and Titans fans.

Oh, and it certainly makes my day to make you look stupid. Keep up the awesome work. Cheers. :)

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, that the bbs that we know and love!

Resorts to personal attacks when proven wrong?

Check.

Very mature, as always. I am surprised you didn’t question my penis size.

Stompin' your Terrible Towel and still hatin' Music City Miracles!

by gramsey712 on Jan 8, 2009 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wouldn't you have to have one

to question its size?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

PS

Even if its not the 15 yard face mask penatly, its still:

Illegal Hands to the Face which is still a penalty. Take care.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

true

But when’s the last time you ever saw them call any kind of face penalty against an offensive player? I don’t think I have ever seen a facemask called, even when running backs blatantly turn their stiffarms into mask grabs. It’s stupid. The only time I ever see hands to the face called is on DBs whose hands slip up too high when jamming a receiver at the line.

Polian said on his radio show that they basically acknowledged that while there’s a rule about hands to the face, they’re free to interpret it as they see fit, which is to say, not at all.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I've seen hands to the face

called on offensive linemen a lot. Pretty sure it was called on teh Colts atleast once this year. its clearly in the rules and it should be enforced. I’m tired of this ‘enforce it when you want’ shit. Its a FUCKING RULE.

Just like I’m tired of fans saying, ‘LOL THE COLTS ARE GETTING WHAT THEY DESERVE FOR HAVING THE RULES CHANGED’.

LISTEN YOU IDIOTIC MORONIC UNABLE TO BREATHE WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE OF A BETTER PERSON: THE COLTS DID NOT, HAVE NOT AND WILL NOT HAVE ANY RULES CHANGED. THEY ASKED TO HAVE THE RULES THAT ARE ON THE RULE BOOK ENFORCED. HAVING SOME DB SLIDE HIS GINORMOUS DICK INTO A RECEIVER BEFORE THE BALL GETS THERE IS AGAINST THE RULES. I’M SORRY IF YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ‘RULE CHANGE’ AND ‘RULE ENFORCEMENT’, ITS NOT MY FAULT THAT YOU’RE DUMBER THAN A BUCKET OF SPIT, FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST I THINK I WANT TO RUN OVER A FIELD MOUSE I’M SO ANGRY, AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH.

phew.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oops

sorry for incorrect grammar and for using a word that might offend some people, I just really like to get angry and yell at wild animals and then threaten them with my car.

*No animals were hurt in the writing of this post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That shit really annoys me. It was not a rule change, it was a goddamn memo with a point of emphasis. There are dozens of these each year. Likewise, every team in the game sends tapes in to highlight bad calls/non calls after games for review. People just pick on Polian because it was such a high profile game and he has a reputation. To say he bullied the Competition Committee is bullshit. He’s a member with the same standing as everyone else there and they discuss all the matters. He has been way more persistent about consistency with holding calls and that hasn’t gotten him anywhere.

Beyond that, it’s not as if they have benefited that much from it anyway. They get called for just as much DPI as they get for them. I’m not sure why people seem to always think that the Colts are always the beneficiaries of the bad calls. And it’s mostly Pats fans who cite that too. The Patriots, of course, who go entire games at a time without flags being thrown. They’re the anti-Steelers. And then they had the nerve to whine about holding on the Tyree miracle catch after their line did so much of it all season. Hilarious.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

field mouse?

I haven’t heard that used in quite that context before.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I used to say

I’m so mad I wanna kill a pigeon, but then it became my understanding that pigeon became a slang term for women, and I didn’t want people to think i was advocating physical harm to women. Of course, I’m sure field mouse will come to mean ‘Tom Brady’ pretty soon, and that will have the double affect of offending football players and homosexuals at the same time, so I’ll probably have to go with something else, like leeches or something, but they are ugly and gross and slimey and no one will probably be offended by their deaths. Sigh, its so hard being angry and anonymous on the internet.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brady?

You’re on a roll today.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 2:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Too funny!
Of course, I’m sure field mouse will come to mean ‘Tom Brady’ pretty soon, and that will have the double affect of offending football players and homosexuals at the same time, so I’ll probably have to go with something else

I’m going to have to print that out and share with the friends!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gransey712

Owned and proven dead wrong for questioning what we saw

by metal_militia on Jan 8, 2009 6:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

because as Nideak said

Illegal hands to the face, can be constituted as just a grab, and thus a penalty is drawn

by metal_militia on Jan 8, 2009 6:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Another thing

If a ref sees two guys grabbing each others face masks, he isn’t going to flag just one because he was “twisting, turning, or pulling” the other.

Oh, and why would I question your penis size? You have no penis.

And save the maturity lectures, please.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Obviously they don't work. Good day.

Stompin' your Terrible Towel and still hatin' Music City Miracles!

by gramsey712 on Jan 8, 2009 2:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

how good of a day can it be

when you have no penis?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah no offense

but you have some pretty trumped up conspiracies here. Did the refs suck? Oh yeah. But it didn’t keep us from winning the game.

Let's go Colts!

by AJforAZ on Jan 8, 2009 12:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

To say the refs didn’t keep the Colts from winning the game is more ridiculous than what BBS just said.

by KingRichard on Jan 8, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We were more than capable

of winning that game. None of the penalties they called were made up. Everything was justifiable. The non-calls were the biggest issue. An NFL team should be able to overcome non-calls

Let's go Colts!

by AJforAZ on Jan 8, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Answer

I don’t think they handed the game to the Chargers on a platter. I just think they made is easier for SD to win in OT. Lots of NFL teams complain about this, especially when they play primetime games. TV studios pressure the NFL to have games end at a certain time, especially if the game is played on NBC.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 1:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Length of games

Obviously, BBS’s theory has some credence. They have been trying to shorten games in both the college and pro games for years. Think about this. If you are a football fan, and you are watching a game as good as this one was (until Winters took over), are you going to look at the clock and say this game is going to long, and turn it off. Are you not going to watch an NFL playoff game because it takes 3 hours and 20 minutes as opposed to 3 hours. In my mind, if the game is good, you don’t care how long it goes. The way this game ended is a black eye for the NFL.

Real football fans relish the game and are not concerned how long it lasts. They are concerned about a fair result (a game decided on the field). They have been trying to shorten the games for years to fit into TV time. It should be of great concern to ALL sports fans that they are now attempting to shorten games with referee calls. Making holding a judgement call was a vehicle to allow the league to control how long games last. The end result of this was the Colts got screwed in this game. Who’s team will be next???

By the way, this whole idea or shortening games was started years ago because the networks complained the games were to long.

by Blueisgood on Jan 8, 2009 1:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

They can shorten games

by removing some of the commercials. The amount of the commercials is making the games unwatchable anymore.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 1:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Aint that the goddamn truth. Yellowsnow and I talked about this during the Cardinals-Falcons game. The thing that bothers me more is some of the football events that you never see anymore. Like, what the hell ever happened to the opening coin flip? They never show that anymore. It’s just all commercials and bs commentary at the beginning and before you know it they are already kicking off. What ever happened to some damn tradition in this sport anymore?

by KingRichard on Jan 8, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

NOOOOOO!!!!!

or….

The Toyatathon of Toyotathons…

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wish I still drank

the 5, 5 dollar.. 5 dollar fooooot loooong commercials would be awesome drunk, imo. They already give me a giggle, the hand gesture seems like it should be in an American Pie movie, not a subway commercial.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

SAVED by Zeeee Rooo!

Or

Let me let me upgrade ya.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 3:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks.

I’d forgotten about that one. Now that is STUCK. IN. MY. HEAD. :S

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

BBS

You’re my hero dude, I’ll read the article later, but where did you find the images and could you get different angles on the first holding penalty and the second one? Or point me in the direction? I’ve been looking for a few days.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

ColtFreaks

ColtFreaks.com posted several images on their message boards.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I added a new update to the post

From Rick Gosselin:

The TV networks, who bankroll the NFL, don’t like it when the games spill over that three-hour time slot they are allotted in the schedule. And if the networks don’t like something, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell doesn’t like something.

    …

    How do the officials speed up games, you ask? Simple: Don’t call penalties. Keep those yellow hankies in your pocket. Thirteen of the 16 games last weekend had 10 penalties or fewer assessed, another season low. Five teams were flagged for a single penalty.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Incidentally

if you could prove any of this (which seems true, circumstantially) it would be a pretty good RICO ACT case, since having officials that pick and choose how a game, a game that happens to be a billion dollar betting business, is called directly affects money changing hands. Look at the Steelers v Chargers game for a pretty easy sample. But you’d have to be able to prove something more than incompetence in order for anything to come of it. Although the fact that Ron Winters, whose crew called a number of penatlies far above the mean was deemed top 8 and put in the playoffs might be proof enough that he isn’t incompetent. Dunno. Anyhow, Ive been howling at the moon about officiating so long my face is blue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This is terrible

All week long we have had to listen to trolls on some sites and idiots in the media talking about Colts fans and Freeney whining about the officials, when rational fans kept their mouths shut. And now, five days after the fact, you print this tripe. It’s bad enough that you’re whining nearly a week later, but to call it some kind of conspiracy theory with the TV networks is the height of stupidity. It makes us all look bad.

They had the flag happiest crew in the NFL and knew this going in. Yes, they should’ve called more penalties in regulation against the Chargers, and yes, they were inconsistent. They’re also on record as being the most home team-favoring crew in the league. They also knew this going in. Everyone in the entire organization knew that they’d be called for minor penalties, so there’s no excuse to have committed those infractions.

The Colts did not play well enough to win, plain and simple. If they had executed on 2nd and 3rd down at the end of the game, they would’ve won, but they didn’t. The team that did execute won. And they would’ve won with or without those penalties. Do you really think that they were going to win a field position battle in OT with Scifres punting from the 40 if the Jennings flag wasn’t thrown? That game was over as soon as they crossed midfield.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 2:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

one thing...

You’re right about Pereira, although the biggest problem is that Eisen or whoever is hosting sets him up for success. They only ask the easy questions. It’s simple to slow down the tape to show exactly where the hold was in super slow motion, but it’s not so simple to explain why they weren’t calling fuckall against McNeill. The real issue was completely avoided. I definitely agree that they need full time guys and someone who will hold them accountable for the calls they miss, rather than just the accuracy of the ones they do make.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So, Mike

Here we have an 80 yard touchdown run where no one was touched and he clearly broke the plane, would you like to talk about it?

Well, Rich, here is a classic example of 97% of all plays in the NFL, i’m glad you brought it up. Lets watch this play 42 times till our segment is over. See here? Clean hole, as all of the defenders were on the side lines drinking gatoraid. Now see the runner? This is great, he’s running, he’s not taunting any one, and we’re 97% sure pacman jones didn’t pay him to shoot anyone. Now see here, he enters the end zone with ball firmly in hand. Great play. Great job by Walt Coleman. Great official. Look at my great paycheck. Its great.

Thank you, Mike, have a great week. That was official review, sponsored by KY Jelly: Why the NFL sticks it to you, lube it up with KY Jelly, now available in a nice warming gel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

HA

Awesome.

What’s sad is that I read that with his voice in my head and it fit too perfectly.

That segment has so much potential. And I will give him credit – almost every week they do find a call where he admits there was an error, even though they pick the minor ones without a major effect – but the fact is, if you have slow motion, you can find a penalty on almost every single down in the NFL if you look hard enough and get super specific with the rules. So reviewing controversial calls just to point out the penalty is kind of pointless. Especially when there were 15 or so others that should’ve been called that don’t get discussed at all.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

re: slow mo

Here’s one more thing to add to the conspiracy theory pile: Earlier in the year when Mike was on official review he said to Rich: “Now remember, we dont want officials to use slow motion to make every call, we want them to review the play and try to make calls in real time, because thats how they view the play in person, they don’t have slow mo eyes’ (Paraphrased). Then, during the whole, ‘lets screw the ravens out of being division champs’ fiasco, Pereira said, ‘well, if you look at it on super slow mo, you can clearly see that the ball broke the plane while in possession of the receiver.’ First, the last point is completely false. I have a 50” HD LCD TV and with it in freeze frame and in zoom 3 in as soon as he touched the ball, it wasn’t clear that it broke the plane, let alone knowing when he had possession. Second, again, the NFL applies rules and principles when it sees fit. We don’t want super slow mo used, unless we do. They need full time officials with full time rules. If a game takes 6 hours because the Raiders are playing the Jaguars (two teams I consider to be undisciplined, unless they are playing the Colts, of course) then it takes 6 hours. Enforce the rules, or don’t have the rules.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But on my 50" HD Plasma TV which is clearly WAY BETTER because it’s the OFFICIAL HD TV of the NFL (!!!!) it was clear that it was in his possession (even though it had just touched his hands that instant) and 100% obvious that it was over the line, all at the same time. Or at least that’s what I think. And that’s indisputable, motherfucker.

That was stupid. They would’ve scored on the next play either way. The Ravens were toast.

The play that the Ravens really got screwed on was the bullshit roughing the passer that gave the Titans the winning drive early in the year. Not only was it a ridiculous call, the play should’ve been dead long before that due to a false start. The Ravens had that game won, even back when Flacco wasn’t as experienced and Haynesworth wasn’t tired or banged up, which is a big reason why it’s likely they’ll knock them off this weekend and set us up for another nice boring low scoring AFC North game next weekend.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well,

on my 100" projection screen….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

"Where the calls legit? Yes. Where they appropriate? Absolutely not. "

What the hell kind of logic is that? If a call is legit, it’s always appropriate, because the PENALTY IS BEING COMMMITED. Maybe Winters got “flag happy” because the Colts commited blatantly obvious penalties.

Refs aren’t perfect, they’re human. They miss calls, it happens. The Colts deserved to lose that game because they were outplayed by San Diego.

“I think it is pretty safe to say the Colts were screwed by the refs this year.”

Yes, because the REFS were the ones that did an EMPTY BACKFIELD PASS when you should be running the clock. The REFS were the ones that couldn’t make a tackle. The REFS were the ones who couldn’t run all season. All the refs fault.

The Colts didn’t deserve to keep going on, they got outplayed. I’m as upset of any of you, but they got beat, plain and simple.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 4:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

did you see the empty backfield play where Peyton was sacked?

If your tight end is being mugged, should the REFS throw a flag?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 4:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Remember, REFS MISS CALLS, THEY ARE HUMAN

That doesn’t change the fact that that was a STUPID playcall anyway. Run the damn ball. If you’re going to pass, at least call a play-action pass.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 4:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

huh?

wait, what?

seriously?

So iffy calls in overtime in favor of the chargers are OK.

Missing calls in favor of the Colts are OK.

I don’t understand, my not wired to think in x / 0 = checkmark.

If Tim Jennings was holding in OT and its called, the holding against the colts receivers should have been called in regulation. They didn’t miss the Colts’ calls (that were iffy) but they miss the chargers calls that clearly affected the out come of a play (and if he catches it for a first down the game is over, fyi) and therefore the game.

eegads.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 4:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm saying it's OK to screw up calls

My point is that saying “OMG THE REFS SCREWED US THAT”S THE ONLY REASON WE LOST" is just plain ignorant. Refs make mistakes, always have, and will until the end of time.

But just because they missed something early doesn’t mean that you ignore it later. If you see something that is a penalty, CALL IT. The Colts committed stupid penalties at the end of the game.

You seemed to ignore that the 3rd and 2 playcall, holding or not, was a STUPID PLAYCALL by any stretch. Yes, if he catches it, the game is over. But a run for a first down ends the game too.

Yes, it’s a good idea on a key 3rd and 2 to just walk up to the defense and say, “Hey guys, we’re going to pass it, good luck!” That’s what the Colts did on that play. That’s why it’s a STUPID playcall.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 4:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Er, saying it's NOT OK to screw up calls

Great, now because I accidentally fucked up the title, everyone is going to immediately call me a fraud. Fantastic.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 4:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

they didn't

‘fuck up calls early’. The holding on Dallas Clark happened with 2 minutes left… IN THE GAME. That holding led to Peyton being sacked, led to Hunter Smith punting from the back of the end zone, led to the Chargers starting at the Colts’ 38, led to the tying field goal which took us in..to..ovvvvverrrrrrrrrrrr time.

There is no rule that says you have to run on 3rd and 2 when you’re only able to get 1.2 yards per carry and the refs shouldn’t rig the game to be that way. If they were MISSING the call with 2 minutes left to go, how did they miraculously see it 4 minutes later?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 4:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because they made a mistake

It sucks, but it happens.

My beef with the 3rd and 2 is not as much because it’s a pass, but because it was EMPTY BACKFIELD. Don’t just tell them your passing, at least do play-action, since that is a running scenario.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

whats that have to do with the price of tea in china

the play call isn’t relevant. A penalty shouldn’t be called or missed based on the play call.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I never said it should be

Look, the ref missed a call. But that’s PART OF THE GAME. The Colts still had PLENTY of chances to win that game, and they blew it.

And the reason I keep mentioning the play-call is because it was THAT awful of a decision. I know it means nothing to you, but that was still a horrible decision.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Before you say it was a horrible decision one more time

Go look up the success rate of plays run from the empty backfield this year and get back to me.

If you are unwilling to do this, continue to say it was a horrible decision and look foolish. I don’t care for the empty, either, but they have completely a majority of their plays run from that formation for far more than 2 yards. Against the chargers, no less. The man on the play would have been opened if he hadn’t been in the process of being sexually molested.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd love for you to find a stat

But I want you to listen here. Say you are in that situation, you don’t trust your run game, but it is a down where the Chargers expect run, and football logic says run.

IF you want to pass, do you call a play-action to catch the defense off-guard? Or do you just tell them before the snap that you are going to pass?

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I call the play that I think will succeed.

And then I have my players run that play.

And then when my players are held, I expect the five-yard-automatic first down flag thrown.

You’re not correct, do you see why?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The play "you think will succeed"

Is subjective to each person’s strategic minds. What I would call is obviously different than you. No one is “Right or Wrong” because WE didn’t get a chance to call the play.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hmm.

so if play calling is ‘subjective’ and rules are in black and white, which do you think you should be arguing about and which should you be saying, ‘well, i don’t get paid millions of dollars a year to make those decisions’.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm saying that "IN MY HUMBLE OPINION"

It was a terrible playcall.

 Does that mean anything in the grand scheme? Of course not. NONE of our opinions mean jack shit, mine and yours as well.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

dude

I wouldn’t wipe my ass with your humble opinion. Because your humble opinion is dumber than toilet paper, to be honest. Seriously, play calling is SUBJECTIVE. Rules are BLACK AND WHITE. So you’re telling me the refs missed every penalty on the chargers for 60 minutes and then missed none on the Colts in overtime? You’re logic is more whacked than a pinata.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For the love of Christ

“So you’re telling me the refs missed every penalty on the chargers for 60 minutes and then missed none on the Colts in overtime?”

They didn’t miss every penalty on the Chargers, that simply isn’t true.

And rules are BLACK and WHITE as you’ve said. When you commit a foul, it is a PENALTY.

I’m not saying the refs didn’t miss calls on the Chargers, but once again REFS ARE HUMAN.

In the BLACK AND WHITE rules, the Colts penalties in overtime were all INFRACTIONS. Simple as that. Consult a rule book. They violated the rules. Do you not understand that?

Once again, the refs missed calls. Once again, you ignore that I’ve said this about 1000 times now.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wrote this days ago:
Seventh, I have a beef with people saying officiating wasn’t a problem. I have to go to my normal bullet point type post here, because there are a lot of issues:

1) Ron Winters crew called the most penalties in the league this year. How does he make the playoffs? Here’s what I’m getting at: The league continues to tell us that their officials are 98% accurate! Okay… then how is Ron Winters’ crew calling so many more penalties than everyone else? Are players just more undisciplined when Winters is around? Do you see what I’m getting at? If Ron Winters’ crew is so good that they are top 8, then clearly more penalties should be called every game. You can’t be both accure and have such a disparity.

2) I agree with most calls against the Colts Saturday night except the Tim Jennings call in OT. Much like the GB game where they roughed up the Colts receivers, Winters crew sent a message: We’re letting you play the game like this. The Colts receivers were jammed, tugged, held, roughed up, and only one call in the first quarter to show for it. Then, in OT, hand fighting on both sides gets a PI call. Okay… Way to be inconsistent.

3) My beef with officiating is almost never the calls that go against the Colts. Its almost always the calls that DON’T go against their opponents. The Colts played a winless team, a crappy browns team, a crappy bengals team, a mugging GB team, a thuggish Jax team (twice) and the Colts had the FEWEST PENALTIES IN THEIR FAVOR IN THE LEAGUE. I would dare an unbias person to watch that Colts v Chargers game and tell me that the game was called consistently. There were multiple hands to the face on freeney uncalled (I’ve given up on holding, because apparently it NEVER affects a play, but hands to the face is cut and dry), there was a blatant trip against the chargers (he reached out and grabbed clint session’s ankle on a big Sproles run) that went uncalled, but Saturday losing body control was snap-called. There was mugging int he secondary all night, uncalled. Call the penatlies that are there. ALL OF THEM.

Apparently I do understand what black and white means.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Once again

I ask you a simple question. Where those 3 calls in overtime, according to the rule book; penalties? Yes or No?

I don’t know how many times I have to say this. The refs MISSED CALLS. It’s a part of the game. It’s an unfortunate reality.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if you read that block of blue quoted post

all of your questions will be answer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So you only disagree with the Jennings call of the OT ones?

That was certainly the most questionable of the bunch. By the rule, it was right, but like you said, they were terribly inconsistent.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

Both calls were correct by the letter of the law. Session clearly had a face mask and Foster was clearly holding.

(steven a. smith voice) HOWEVER (/steven a. smith voice), it would seem to me, the video evidence of both of those plays shows it should have been off-setting penalties. There was clearly either face mask or hands to the face in the session penalty and on the holding call on foster, he was being held/dragged down.

I’m not making excuses, by the way, just being 100% honest. Both of those were penalties on the Colts. Both should have been flagged. Its also clear to me from the pictures that both plays should have been ‘played over’.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Alright

As I’ve been saying, I AGREE that calls were missed that benefited the Chargers. I’m just saying that those penalties on the Colts were legitimate penalties.

Once again, I’m not disagreeing that the Chargers SHOULD have been flagged on those plays. But they weren’t, which is just unfortunately how it played out.

(Also, I must compliment you on your use of the Stephen A. reference)

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

also, my problem with defensive holding

(the DLine version, not the DB version)

is basically ehocing what Freeney said: the colts cant get ONE holding call against the chargers all night, but they call the yeti of all calls, defensive holding on a d-lineman? thats horseshit to the nth degree, but it was an infraction;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

PS on this one:

You’re the one calling it a bad play call, yet you’re not an offensive coordinator or any sort of NFL person, and you have no stat to back up what you’re saying.

Can I just walk down the street yelling THIEF at random people with no proof?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And your the one saying that the game didn't matter and it was only refs that determined it

I’d love to see your credibility as well.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How does the play call matter?

Thats the play they called. There are no good or bad play calls. Only successful or unsuccesful plays. Seriously, I question a lot of things that happen in the NFL, but don’t you think Tom Moore and Peyton Manning know a little more than you about play calling?

I’m not saying I have ANY credibility. I’m saying this: The rule book is black and white. The rules are the rules. When you break the rules you should be flagged for it.

Play calling is subjective and way over the head me and you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, you should be flagged when you break the rules

We agree on something!

YES, the refs should’ve flagged that hold. But they didn’t. I’m not saying it’s right because it isn’t, but it’s what happened.

When you break the rules, you should be flagged. On the Colts calls in OT, they BROKE THE RULES. And they got flagged.

Once again, there are tons of calls missed in sports every day. It’s an unfortunate reality, and it always will be.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

there is a 5 yard rule. clark barely got past the first down marker (which was only 2 yards) before manning got sacked. You are absolutely allowed to jam a receiver at the line and up to 5 yards. Jennings grabbed Chambers at 6 yards, it really shouldve been flat out PI as contact was being made throughout the play. Just because someone has their arms outstretched doesnt mean hes playing the ball and not making contact.

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 9:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Chuck = holding?

Really? Is this the result of the lowered california educational standards?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

And it was actually more like 5 yards plus or minus half a yard. Trust me, Chambers started at the 39 and the “penalty” was at the 44. Of course if you want to get all your information from the V.P. of officiating on the NFL network which, ok this might be a total shocker, is the NFL network. I’d try to capitalize NFL but I’ll let you try to make the association. Pretty funny too that they show 1 camera angle on all the penalties when they have the ability to have every single camera angle possible. 50 feet in the air and saying “this is where the network stopped it and I have no reason to defend the officating being the V.P. of the organization myself, but I’m not going to show you exactly when Rivers threw the ball, I’m not going to show you how far away the ref was, and I’m not going to show you when the flag was thrown, I’m just going to tell you and you’re going to believe me.” Did they not have the film of Session having a finger in his eyeball before the facemask? Did they not have the footage from the sideline on the hold from Foster? I’m pretty sure I remember multiple angles shown from the game and it looked like Foster was pushed and that’s what caused the infraction in the first place. Or the footage of the possible intentional grounding 2 plays earlier on Rivers? I’ll make sure you to show you the picture. It’s just sort of funny that all these crazy images of what actually happened during the play or the non calls throughout the game are popping up from people not affiliated with the NFL.

Or are you going to claim that they’re all photoshopped?

If you believe what you’re saying with an unbiased take, that’s one thing. But to me you’re just a sheep.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 9:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

VP of officiating

I dont know what this means. I am in NY and we do not get the NFL network because Time Warner is in a dispute with the NFL Network on how much it should cost subscribers.

Anyhow, the only angle i have is the one they showed on TV. like i said, it shouldve been PI not holding 5 yard penalty. the ball was in the air and jennings was still making contact.

the sack on the 3rd and 2 cannot possibly be holding. you are allowed to make contact with a receiver before the 5 yard mark. I mean clark runs right at the defender, hows the defender supposed to determine if hes going out for a pass or blocking 2 yards from the LOS.

Intentional Grounding? Hester is like 2 feet away from the ball rivers sidearmed out of there. Im sure hester wasnt the primary receiver but im sure rivers knew he was there and even if he didnt it doesnt matter, as long as an eligible receiver is in the vicinity of the throw it wont be called intentional grounding.

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 10:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FRAUD!

;)

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by BigBlueShoe on Jan 8, 2009 5:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's ok to f - up the title

you’re human, afterall….JUST LIKE THE IDIOT REFS who are paid professionals, btw.

just giving you shit. ;)

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

http://www.irun.com/users/6967/downloads/Jays%20Win%20Back-to-Back%20World%20Series.mp3

by torontocoltsfan on Jan 8, 2009 7:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lol wow

That argument totally doesn’t help your case.

by KingRichard on Jan 8, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well they did have a higher VOA for the game

went to OT where the coinflip gives a 20% swing in win probability (winner of the toss wins 60% of the time, loser 40%) the same as the difference between a 6-7 win team and a 9-10 win team.

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 4:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Say what now?

VOA?

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

From Football Outsiders

like DVOA, but not adjusted for opponent.

Comparing every play to the league average outcome in that situation over the last few years, both teams were above average, but the Colts played a little better (5% to 3% if I remember right)

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 4:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So...what does that have to do with this?

I’m still not following you.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 4:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

what he's getting out, plain and simple

is that using a non-bias, completely scientific method which is respected by various NFL and media outlets, the Colts outplayed the Chargers for most of the game. There were two things that tilted the game to the Chargers: Their punter and the officiating. In a game that is close, officiating can, in fact, sway a game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 5:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

officiating and the coin toss did it

2% VOA is not much

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sure, guess i was taking some liberties...

if their punter doesn’t pin the colts inside the 5 on every punt, how many points do the colts put up based on their yardage, etc… probably more than 17.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FO put Scifres day at almost 4 points worth of field position over an average punter

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 6:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Alright, I gotcha

Look, I’m not saying the refs didn’t influence the game, I’m just saying that to solely blame the loss on them is ignorant, when even after missed calls, the Colts still had opportunities.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

missed oppurtunities helped out by

the officials. Sure, the colts missed oppurtunities, but last i checked, the chargers WERE paid to play defense.

So you’re telling me that every team in the NFL has to score on every drive where the officials don’t screw them so they can overcome the drives where they are screwed? Your logic makes no sense, I’m sorry. You say playcalling overrides bad officiating. You say overcoming good defenses overrides bad officiating. I don’t understand, at all.

With your logic, Charles Barkley shouldn’t get arrested for DUI because he was on his way to a BJ (a good one, according to him).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How does my logic make no sense?

You make it seem like the players have NOTHING to do with the game.

Last I checked, the Colts were ALSO PAYED TO PLAY DEFENSE. And they STILL could have stopped the Chargers from getting a FG, and they STILL could’ve stopped the Chargers in overtime. But they decided to commit penalties (Yes, all of those defensive penalties in OT WERE THE RIGHT CALL) and completely fail to make a tackle.

The Colts had plenty of chances to lose that game, and THEY LOST IT. You seem to think that the game was SINGLE-HANDEDLY LOST BY THE OFFICIALS, which is just simply ignorant.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

First, I don’t think the Colts players are PAYED to do anything, but I’m sure they are probably paid to do a lot of things.

The Colts are paid to win, the chargers are paid to win. This is correct. What you keep not getting through your cranium is that in that game, the Chargers were aided by the officials in their movement and stopping of the ball. Why is this so hard for you to understand? In an evenly matched game, the team that gets 3 first down from officials is going to beat the team that didn’t get the holding call at the end of the game. It’s not hard to understand for anyone but you.

One more time: If there are two teams that are playing even and one of them is benefitting more from officiating than the other, then probably 9 times out of 10 (normally I’d say 10 times out of 10, but I guess someone could go last boy scout on the program and really mess up my made up statistics) then team that gets the help from the refs will win.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I never said the officiating had no role

IF you would actually read my posts, you’d see that.

I never said it didn’t help, but there is NO FUCKING WAY IN HELL THE REFS ARE THE ONLY REASON THEY LOST WON THEY CAN’T RUN OR FUCKING TACKLE.

And once again, as much as you want to whine, all of those calls in overtime were LEGITIMATE CALLS. How is it the refs fault that the Colts committed penalties? Are they just supposed to ignore them or something.

Yes, the Refs missed calls. I’m sure if you watched the game over again, both teams benefited from missed calls. Hell, the Colts got the aid of a terrible PI call in the first quarter.

IT HAPPENS. REFEREES AREN’T PERFECT. THEY MISS CALLS, THAT’S CALL REALITY.

Were the Chargers helped by the outcomes of the officiating? Yes. Is that the SOLE REASON the Chargers won? No fucking chance. And if you really can’t see that, then you don’t understand football.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wait, what?

How was that a terrible PI call in the first quarter when the defensive player clearly hit harrison when the ball was in the air?

I cannot fathom how someone can sit there and say that officiating wasn’t a significant contributing factor to the outcome of a game when the crew that calls the most penalties in the league calls 3 on teh home team (there’s visual evidence in this link of 2 more that should have been called, out of 2 pictures) and 3 alone on the road team in overtime, and I’m sorry, the holding in OT wasn’t holding based on how they had called the whole game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Once again

You say that I said it wasn’t a contributing factor. WHERE THE HELL DID I SAY THAT? How about you ACTUALLY READ my posts.

How many times do I have to spell it out to you? Did the refs play a role? YES!!! See, I’ll put it in bold so MAYBE you’ll actually see it this time.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no no

significant contributing factor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Regarding the Harrison call

What I remember from the replay that NBC showed, I saw very little contact and it seems incidental.

But I acknowledge I could be wrong on that one, I’d have to go back and see it.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Madden and Michaels said it was the correct call

not that I find them credible or good at what they do, but when people who are general a schill for the refs and NFL in general say that, then I sort of feel it was such a bad play by the defneder that he should be kicked out of the league.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting

Sounds like I’m wrong on that one. I might be thinking of one from the last Chargers game. Not sure.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously dude

You really don’t get what he’s saying do you? It’s really not that hard to understand. Even if it wasn’t the sole reason the Colts lost, they altered the outcome of the game and provided an unfair playing field. That’s the point of officiating, to prevent that. If you’re admitting that it gave an advantage to the Chargers, that means that the officiating failed at what it was inteded to do.

If you go to trial and your lawyer is trying to defend you but the judge is sitting there yawning when he speaks, and everytime your lawyer starts to make a point the judge starts banging his gavel as hard as he can going “ORDER ORDER! YOU’RE IN CONTEMPT YOU BASTARD!” But then lets the other lawyer say and do anything he wants, sure it might not be the only reason you lose, but there’d be a mistrial, public outrage, and the judge would probably be removed.

It’s not a hard concept to understand.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 9:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I totally get it

I don’t know how many times I’ve said the refs played a role in the loss. I’m just saying that it WASN’T THE ONLY REASON the Colts lost. That’s what you guys are just ignoring.

I never said the officiating didn’t fail. Once again, you are putting words in my mouth.

MY POINT from the beginning is that the referees were NOT THE ONLY (SINGLE, ONE, 1!) factor in the Colts loss. Agree?

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I will spell it out one last time you

The referees were a significant factor in the Colts losing to San Diego, but not the only factor.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I want you to say one thing

And I won’t bug you anymore.

In the SD/Chargers game with the blown call on the fumble, did the Chargers still have the opportunity to stop the Broncos? Did the Broncos not only have to score a TD but a two point conversion to win?

I want you to say “The Chargers are complete bitches for saying that the reason they lost that game was because of the officiating. And complaining about it for more than 3 months is a tactless childish act that they had ample opportunities to rectify before the end of the season but continued to use as a cop out to why their season had gone the way that it went. And I understand that the points brought up, while I may or may not agree with, ended the Colts season. Not to mention, a team with 4 more wins, which included one over the Chargers in San Diego, represents a flaw in the seeding for the playoffs by giving a significant advantage to a team that didn’t perform as well in the regular season.”

If you can say that, then I’ll cede your point. I won’t agree with it, but I won’t think you’re an idiot.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

one thing about the Colts having to play @ SD...

last year the Colts lost to SD in the regular season and the chargers had to go to indy (and won), so I’m not really irritated by that this year. You gotta beat who ever is in front of you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s not my point. My point is that’s what more than one unbiased person had said. I honestly didn’t care, the Colts play well on the road. But home games do provide an advantage. My point was that the Chargers had homefield, great special teams, phenomenal field position, the coin flip in OT, and then when you add in the iffy calls and noncalls, you’re asking alot from any team to win. The Chargers undeniably had multiple things go their way, and the Colts led until the very end of the game and I believe outplayed the Chargers if you take out the penalties. That was my point. Officiating and special teams were the main factors that led to the loss. If we kicked off to them in OT and Sproles returns it for a TD or drive down the field, then straight up, even with the other things going their way, they beat us. I’d even ignore all the missed calls during regulation. It happens.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the colts far and away out played everyone

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

errrr

everyone on the chargers other than their punter and sproles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's a lot of words

So let me says this:

Yes, the Chargers still had the chance to stop the Broncos. In that game, the officials also weren’t the ONLY (Key word there, ONLY) reason the Chargers lost the game. And the officials weren’t the ONLY (Once again, important word) reason the Colts lost the game.

Yes, it’s a flaw in the seeding that the Chargers are hosting that game. I wrote an article on that recently, and I think seeding should be simply by record.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You're being hypocritical

Because the ref didn’t call the plays after, didn’t decide to go for 2, and didn’t fold. It’s the same situation. The call may have been blatant and terrible, but the fact remains the Chargers still had it in their power to win by either stopping the TD or the 2 point conversion.

You’re obviously not unbiased or objective.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just said that

Read the sentence. I said, and I quote,

“Yes, the Chargers still had the chance to stop the Broncos.”

I said that. Please re-read my post.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You're right

My bad, I was watching the Oklahoma punter get blasted. My fault. I still want you to say they’re “bitches”, it’d make me feel better. Throw me a bone.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

I don’t think I’d go as far as calling a whole team “bitches” but Philip Rivers certainly fits that mold :)

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I retract

Anything I said to personally attack you. I stand by my analysis, but after that statement, you’re cool by me.

Am I the only one that thinks that right now, if I went to a dictionary or an encyclopedia and looked up the word “Douchebag”, there would be nothing written. Just a picture of Rivers? I’m not saying he IS a douche, even though I do, but he just LOOKS like one.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rivers

I hear ya on him for sure.

Ultimately, we’re all upset about the same thing, the Colts losing. It sucks, but it isn’t changing.

Let’s just hope the offseason goes well. Luckily refs have no effect on offseason moves.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 11:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You know Freeney is going to be fined

for his response. And that sucks.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 7:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

not since my wife said to me, 'is that girl hot?'

has a man been so punished for being so honest…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How come Mike Perierra (or how ever you spell it)

can go on cable and admit to a national audience that the refs made a mistake, but if a player so much as alludes to a questionable call – and doesn’t even call out the referee by name or insult them — he can get fined ten thousand dollars???? Double standard.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jan 8, 2009 9:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no fun league

freeney can pay it

http://www.irun.com/users/6967/downloads/Jays%20Win%20Back-to-Back%20World%20Series.mp3

by torontocoltsfan on Jan 8, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07G23zMGa4g&feature=related

http://www.irun.com/users/6967/downloads/Jays%20Win%20Back-to-Back%20World%20Series.mp3

by torontocoltsfan on Jan 8, 2009 7:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope they don't

Not because of censorship or whatever, but if they don’t they basically are saying “You’re right.”

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 9:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lots of people saying officials have no affect on the outcome of the game

So for all of you arguing this point, let’s play an 11 on 11 game. We’ll make a small wager on the game, lets say, 5.2 billion dollars. Every time my team has the ball, no penalties will be called, unless my team fails to pick up a first down, then your defense will be flagged for something that gives my team an automatic first down. Every time your team has the ball, you’ll be flagged every time you have a successful play. So the wager is, my team will win, yours will lose. I’ll even make this: You can have pro caliber players on your team and I’ll use children that just learned to walk 2 days ago. And if you score any points, you automatically win. OK? We have a deal? Since officiating has no bearing on the outcome of games this should be no problem for you, right? Free money? Sign up and lets go, ok?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 7:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Brilliant!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 8, 2009 7:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

since we are using metaphors I'll go with the best one I've heard about the fairness of the NFL overtime system

Let’s play some basketball, one on one, and bet 1,000 dollars on it, first person to score wins. I get the ball.

What? Of course that’s fair, you have the opportunity to stop me from scoring.

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 8, 2009 8:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just Curious

I agree the officiating has been awful this year. That being said, how were colts fans feeling after the win in San Diego earlier in the year. If you recall there was a Pass Interference on Antonio Cromartie on a 3rd down on a ball thrown out of bounds not 1 foot away from the receiver. There was a PI call on Stephen Cooper on the following 3rd down when he wasnt even in pass coverage. On the following play Anthony Gonzalez fumbled the ball and the chargers recovered only for the refs to rule incomplete.

Then of course there was the 4th and 1 spot play where the line judge marks the ball short only for the head official to mark it as a first down. This prompted the buzz from upstairs to review the spot and gave Manning and Dungy 5 minutes to devise a crucial 4th and 1 play without burning their final timeout. Then on the 4th and 1 play Jammer gets picked by an official leaving marvin harrison wide open, they then huddle up and do a run play to get 3 yards closer and then burn their final timeout. Did colts fans feel that win was cheapened in any way?

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 9:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Let me go ahead and say one thing:

You’re just sort of making stuff up, so let me put this one to rest: The Gonzo fumble in the first game was going right to Dallas Clark, Dallas Clark stopped going for the ball when he heard the whistle, at which point some Chargers players pounced on it so they could start their whining ASAP. Stop twisting and distorting facts so that you can sound special on another board.

The quick spot thing happens constantly in a 2 minute drill situation, and I’m almost sure that it did not give the Colts 5 minutes to devise a plan. Unless you used a stop watch, try not using hyperbole and exaggeration to make a point that could be well supported by facts, if it weren’t entirely made up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Soon as this game is over

I’ll make sure to come in and read what’s being posted. From that last statement by natronemeans this is going to be fun.

I’ll leave you with this before I come back.

Was the Denver blown call bad? Yep, sure was. Did Chargers fans cry for over two months that it was going to keep them out of the playoffs and get sympathy from the entire league? Yep. Was that game so early on in the season that them crying about it starting to get old but people felt bad so they didn’t say anything? Yep. I just like the double standard that’s being shown by Chargers fans that we don’t have any right to gripe about bad calls, non calls, that didn’t just happen in OT but throughout the entire game, in a playoff game, when the glaring ones happened in quick succession in OT.

I’ll sum up so I can get back to the title game, but I’ll be adding some things later. There’s 30 teams, not 31 that can come in here and make fun of us, say we’re whining, and say we should’ve done this or that. The two teams exempt from this are the Colts, and I’ll give you a second to guess who the other team is….. Yeah, it’s a prime example of douchebaggery for a Chargers fan to all of a sudden be an avid supporter of NFL officiating.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 9:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

officiating

Re read my post. Never did i say those calls shouldnt have been called or should have been called. In fact i started off my post saying that i agree the officiating has been bad this year. out of those 3 calls the one i thought was ticky tack was the defensive holding call on your lineman. It was indeed holding but in the trenches they should let that go.

my point was that the colts benefitted from calls that not only were ticky tack but were flat out wrong in the regular season game. The original article here states that the colts were robbed by a phantom PI call against the jags but gives no mention to how the chargers were robbed in their first meeting.

the difference between this game and the hochuli call is obvious. The colts actually committed penalties on that OT drive whether they should have been called or not. The hochuli call took a sure win away from the chargers and gave denver another chance on a mistake by an official.

Believe it or not any fan of any team can come in here and claim they got screwed by the refs, even charger fans. Hell, even in the playoff game in the first qtr jammer got called for a PI for 30 yards when he barely touched harrison, we got called for an offsides even though saturday moved. refs suck. I wish the refs werent a factor just like I wish they werent a factor in last years playoff game when cromartie ran back that INT only for it to be called back when Addai tackled weddle during the return.

Hope that clears things up for you. Though im sure ill be flamed further.

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No one is flaming you

I brought up a point which You’ve had 2 posts to address. You were wrong about the Gonzo fumble (and other things, bu t you don’t seem to be able to handle two things at a time, so we’ll get there later) and you just sort of ignore it. As soon as you say, "hi, my name is natronmeans, im a moron for talking about the gonzalez fumble in the context of a screw job of the chargers’, i’ll get to your other points. Until you’re able to do that, you’re just a troll that wants to keep jumping on to a new point after you get proven wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

not flaming

you called me sweet cheeks a lying moron and told me to shut the heck up. I mean ive been told worse but sounds like flaming to me. Anyway, unfortunately i do not have the game available to check that. The point however was the refs screwed up the call. Gonzalez fumbled. I cant say with certainty that the chargers wouldve recovered the ball if what you say is true, i just remember cromartie getting to the ball. If no whistle blew i think its hard to say that clark couldve just picked up the ball unmolested and the colts could continue the drive. Fact is the call was wrong (incomplete). ok now get to the other points.

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 10:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uhm

well, its not hard to say. The ball was 6 inches from him [Clark]. And sorry, but I’m not convinced that it was a catch.

Quick spots:

Colts @ NE, quick spotted a ball that was clearly short for The Terriffic Toms on a 4th and inches from midfield with under 2 minutes to go. The TTTs got the 1st and 10 play off too fast to even challenge.

Was the one from Colts @ SD 2006-2007 quick spotted and then reviewed? My point is: In a 2-minute situation there are always quick spots. THe review did not take 5 minutes. And even if it took 4 minutes 59 seconds (the colts run a no huddle hurry up offense, do you think they need more than 40 seconds to come up with a play call?) it helped the chargers defense get rested and come up with a perfect play to stop the obvious QB sneak that was coming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wait a minute

you dont even know what play im talking about! it was not 06/07. it was this regular season. Final drive. vinatieri kicks game winning 51 yard FG.

lets get the setting right.

it was 3rd and 8 or so. Harrison makes a catch that is about 1 yard short of the first down marker and is tackled immediately by weddle. The Line Judge marks the ball correctly. 4th down. the head referee then picks up the ball marks it past the yellow line and another ref now signals first down. There is 32 seconds left in the game and the colts have 1 timeout left and the ball is around the 47 of San Diego.

Since it was marked a first down manning hustles to the line to snap a play but the official gets buzzed to review the spot. (Wouldnt have needed a review if the head ref didnt mark it incorrectly as the line judge already had marked it correctly.

so they check the replay. they determine where the ball should be placed, they measure to see how long they have to go. Manning is on the sideline talking to dungy. The 4th and 1 play is devised and it is not a QB sneak, it is a pass to Marvin Harrison. San Diego applies pressure but manning passes to a wide open Harrison. Replays show why he was so wide open. The official did not get out of the way of Quentin Jammer who slams into the official. The colts get 15 yards. They hurry up to the line they call a running play and get 3 crucial yards. Yards they probably wouldnt have gotten since there is no way they couldve called a running play with 0 timeouts. Viniteiri kicks game winning 51 yard fg.

do you know what im talking about?

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 10:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

I know what you’re talking about, but the difference was between 4th and 1 and a 1st down. So I mean, wouldn’t you rather them review it and give you the 4th down and force us to come up with a very risky play to try to beat you? That ball was underthrown and Harrison had to make a great play to come back and get it. The Colts didn’t tell Turner to call the timeout, that’s why you guys didn’t go to OT.

And I can’t remember which play it was Saturday, but you guys got a pretty nice spot on a pretty important drive. I’ll find out later what it was, but I remember being a little ticked about it and I remember skimming over it a little while ago.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

michael bennett's run

thats the nice spot we got. rivers 3rd and 13 scramble to set up 4th and 1 i thought was a good spot too but of course the end result on that was an INT on the next play.

yes im glad they got the ball spotted correctly in the reg season game. But i am unhappy that the head ref felt the need to spot the ball incorrectly after the line judge (whos job it is to spot the ball) spotted correctly to begin with.

think of the situation. 32 seconds left, its 4th and 1 at the 48 yard line. Does Dungy punt? does he go for it? what play does he call? He would have to use his Timeout, meanwhile while he is thinking the clock is running. He calls TO with 27 seconds left. They decide to go for it. They complete the pass after benefitting from a slow ass ref not getting out of the way. The clock is ticking, they have no timeouts, they spike the ball at the 36 setting up a 54 yard fg and have to get the special teams out right away. totally different situation.

Youre right though. Norv shouldve never called that TO with 1:32 left. That was awful.

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oops

Didn’t see this one, those are the plays I was thinking about in my response right below. Was about to criticize you for being upset over a call that the refs got right too.

I think it’s obvious here that we all have homer tendencies even when trying to be objective, and we’ll all often right, because there are penalties that could be called on almost every damn play in the NFL. Just as you can point to some calls that helped the Colts, there are several in that same game (and obviously this past one) that hurt them.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 10:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There was definitely a bad spot that gave the Cargers a 1st down late in the game last weekend.

Not that there was any chance they would’ve stopped a sneak on the next play, of course. Which is why I didn’t get upset about it.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 10:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you dont even know what play im talking about! it was not 06/07. it was this regular season. Final drive. vinatieri kicks game winning 51 yard FG.

I’m watching the game so i can’t respond to the whole thing atm, but I knew exactly what game you’re talking about, I was just trying to show you that it happens in every game in 2 minute drill situations, because they know they have the booth to rely on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nideak's right

How did I get suckered into talking to you bozos? This is a great game. Stop talking about the past and watch it. It’s seriously one of the better BCS championship games in awhile. The USC/TEN one was good, but this one’s shaping up.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Meh

The whole BCS is a fraud, which is why I’m not watching it. Although I enjoy my brother complaining about how horrible Fox’s coverage is.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know

But I’m trying to win an argument with KingRichard and I needed to watch it for information and scouting purposes.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 11:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

also

if you are a moron and a liar and a sweet cheeks, its not flaming, its just being truthful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 10:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like the tone

But the Chargers had a chance to win that game. Denver had to score a TD and a 2 point conversion. What you just said is pretty hypocritical, I was agreeing with you until the end. You’re still skewing things.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

a chance to win

yup youre right, i didnt say otherwise. He took the win away. it was guaranteed 100%. we recovered a fumble and could run out the clock by downing the ball, end of game chargers win. Hochulis call (as i said in the previous post) gave denver Another chance to win the game. We still couldve stopped them. (The same argument could be made about the colts after the chambers hold) Fact is when you give a team extra chances to score, especially after such a deflating moment you will probably lose.

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 10:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cool

Alright, you’re cool in my book. My main beef isn’t that we lost the game really, and that isn’t what’s been ticking me off. No matter how much complaining or griping we do about it, it doesn’t change the outcome. But if someone comes in saying “blah blah blah, stop whining you have no basis for griping or complaining” then yeah, that ticks me off. It won’t change anything, but Colts fans have earned the right to bitch. Earning the right to bitch is a very small victory but it makes us feel better. And that’s why I wanted to slap the V.P. of officiating. Of course he’s going to defend his dudes and the integrity of the game, but he was dismissive and condescending after specifically choosing replays that made his point and ignoring all the other evidence that non NFL employees have had to dig up themselves by repeatedly watching the game and taking screen captures.

You guys won, I think it was a great game. The way it ended wasn’t worthy of what both those teams did on the field. And referring to your previous question about if the roles were reversed; Yes, if the Colts one that way I definitely would say that we escaped, got lucky, and Chargers fans have the right, if not the duty to bitch about it. I’d be very sheepish if people wanted to grill me on it and if someone said we got lucky I’d say “You’re right, we won, but you’re right.” And I’m not BSing you. The only team I probably wouldn’t say that about would probably be the Patriots. My response would be more along the lines of “HAHAHA! THAT”S RIGHT SUCKAS! You got screwed! How do you feel about THAT?!" But I’m just a bad person I guess.

Otherwise you let referees get away with poor officiating and ultimately detract from the overall experience of the game. I’m not saying this is the same thing, but look how the NBA was looked at after they found out about gambling and corruption by an official? I still don’t look at the NBA the same way and it is a lesser sport in my eyes because of it. Let me repeat, I’m not saying anything shady happened or it was anything more than human error, but fans rely upon officials to pretty much be robots. When errors are made, especially during a playoff game and even more so during a throw down tough game that goes into OT, I and many fans feel we haven’t been provided a game that could’ve potentially been phenomenal. You don’t get the opportunity to witness games with the feel that game had very often. And now that game will be tainted with what transpired in the course of a couple minutes.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 10:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

rewatch the game again please

yeah 5 minutes. and the 2 PI calls? the ref pick?

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 9:19 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

hey now, sweet cheeks

I’ll get to things one at a time, as soon as you admit you’re a lying moron about the gonzalez fumble. If not, shut the heck up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 9:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Let's cheer everyone up

With some SNL Celebrity Jeopardy!

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Jan 8, 2009 10:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

$Texas

Suck it, Trebeck.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 10:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

one last thing

I think you will find charger fans on here defending their victory for obvious reasons. I know earlier one of you said that the league or the media or whoever felt bad because we kept whining about the hochuli call. But i have seen the exact opposite. Ive heard over and over that “we still had a chance to stop them” “it was only week 2” “they shouldnt have given up 31 first half points” “hochuli didnt make you lose the other 7 games.” “stop whining”

Now we are finally on a winning streak and the media and fans of other teams are saying things like “the pats should be there and not the chargers, its not fair”,
  “the colts never should have had to go to San Diego because they have a better record”
“Its not fair that the MVP didnt get a chance in overtime, they need to change the rules. and finally, the charger fan mantra "the refs screwed us.”

weve been screwed all year and told to shut up about it. to stop whining, our QB is a jackass and our RB is a wuss. Im not gonna say that to colts fans, i just want you to know where we are coming from.

We both hate the pats so we should be friends. F the pats. Good luck next year. Dwight Freeney is a beast.

by natronemeans on Jan 8, 2009 10:54 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Point of view

Well I agree that the poor call definitely effected the Chargers season more than just adding that one loss. Momentum is the most talented guy on every team in the league. Momentum can make good teams look historical and make great teams look like they choked. This isn’t a reference to the Chargers because if you go back and look through previous posts I’ve made leading up to this point I’ve defended them and have said they’re the most underrated team in the league and are much better than their record. Look at the Lions, their negative momentum played them to 0-16.

There’s probably 3 teams I can think of off the top of the head that are ignored by the media when they do well, but every mistake is blown out of proportion. These 3 teams happen to have the most villified 3 players that personally experience the same treatment. L.T., McNabb, and Manning. Those are three guys the media and fans from other teams hate to love (or at least acknowledge) but love to hate.

With that said, Rivers is a douche. I mean I’ve heard things but haven’t seen them personally, but I don’t think that factors into as much as me thinking that as much that he just looks like a douche. I’ll quote my post from about 20 minutes ago; “Am I the only one that thinks that right now, if I went to a dictionary or an encyclopedia and looked up the word "Douchebag", there would be nothing written. Just a picture of Rivers? I’m not saying he IS a douche, even though I do, but he just LOOKS like one.”

I don’t mean to offend you. I know Manning looks like an awkward, melon headed, non athletic dude and talks like a goof, but that doesn’t bother me. Some players and teams are just hated because people are jealous and don’t like to see teams that are supposed to succeed actually accomplish anything. The story in the movie is never “The star QB gets the girl. The dorky guy gets slapped and told to go home.” It’s human nature to root for Rudy and not the QB from Waterboy. They want the underdog.

by monstersbox on Jan 8, 2009 11:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hated Rivers too but I have to admit that I watched his entire presser after the Bronco win in Wk 17 and found him shockingly un-douchey. He seems to have grown up and into more of a leader as he made the leap this year in his play as well.

Also, wrt to the Chargers stopping that 2 point conversion, they did pretty much everything right on that play. Cutler just zinged one in there, risky Favrey play by him and great catch too. I’m not inclined to say “they still could’ve won” it. Sure, they could’ve, but they got royally fucked.

Still, I think that the Hochulator’s error in that case, while worse in consequence, is not as bad as the more common blown and missed penalties. Those involve judgement and decisions. Big Ed made an honest mistake with the quick whistle and had no choice but to enforce the rule as written. When a crew ignores blatant holds every play, it’s almost like it’s intentional, and to me that makes it worse.

I don’t say that to try to imply that the Chargers got less screwed, of course. Just that the intent wasn’t there.

by willyduer on Jan 8, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Still, I think that the Hochulator’s error in that case, while worse in consequence, is not as bad as the more common blown and missed penalties. Those involve judgement and decisions. Big Ed made an honest mistake with the quick whistle and had no choice but to enforce the rule as written. When a crew ignores blatant holds every play, it’s almost like it’s intentional, and to me that makes it worse.

Ding! I felt bad for Hochuli because I’ve always thought he was the best ref/crew in the league. He made a mistake that you could see he regretted. It was unintentional and if he had it to do all over again, he would change it in a second. Its crews like walt coleman and ron winters who just flat out screw teams for whatever reason that grates my balls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 8, 2009 11:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hochuli

Is the best referee in the game. If I had the option between being able to pick one ref to officiate my game every single week until they retired (hey, the NFL should let teams draft their refs, I mean they’d still be getting paid for calling the game as well as possible because they’d want to make more money just like players, actually, maybe even more so because they’d at least have a significant consequence for being a complete moron) I’d pick either Hochuli or, dang his name just slipped…anyway, the one ref that looks almost exactly like Marvin Harrison. The league not standing up for him let him pull one of the classiest moves I’ve seen by anyone associated with officiating or the league office in years. His sincere apology was awesome. After that, you seemed kind of like a dickhead if you kept hating on him. Yeah you can say he made a mistake, but that’s what it was. He’s such a good official and explains things so well that when he gave the call on the field he basically came out and said “Look, I feel really really bad about this. I know this is going to be messed up, but it’s the rules guys. You guys going to be cool with this? I’m really really sorry. You guys think I’m a dick huh?”

I need to sell my idea to the NFL about drafting, signing, and trading refs. I think it’d take off. If I hear about this tomorrow as some great idea the league came up with I’m going to hurt somebody.

by monstersbox on Jan 9, 2009 12:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Mike Carey is the second best ref in the league, I agree (hes the one that looks like Marvin). I’ve always said that Carey and Hochuli were my two favorite refs. The Colts don’t seem to get those two refs enough, but whenever I see them, I feel more comfortable about the game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 9, 2009 12:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Carey makes me laugh with his emphatic first down gestures. I haven’t ever thought of him as one of the best, but then again, the only reason I notice him at all is because of the first downs and his occasional overtalking, not because of dumb calls, so that’s a good sign. I can’t really name anyone better than him.

by willyduer on Jan 9, 2009 12:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

carey and hercules have one thing in common, imo

there is rarely a point in one of their games where I’m going, ‘wtf just happened?’ Even when Ed screwed the chargers, he explained exactly what happened, why it happened, and how it would affect the game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 9, 2009 12:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Colts-Chargers refs

Shonn Greene for Heisman
Doak Walker award winner
144 yards per game
6.2 yards per carry
08 TDs per game > 06 GPA

by shake n bake on Jan 9, 2009 12:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

1 thing

When you call Defensive Holding, the ball does not have to be catchable.

That’s only if its a Defensive Pass Interference

by Sinding on Jan 9, 2009 5:45 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

this thread should be renamed

2008 Season: The Pity Party

The Official Enforcer of MCM

by hal41605 on Jan 9, 2009 9:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

we tried to use that name

but apparently your mom and dad are saving that for when you get your first period. Don’t worry, I already got you your gift (its a party pack of midol, I hope I didn’t ruin the surprise).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmGdAPjcgaM&eurl=http://www.only17points.com/&feature=player_embedded

by Nideak on Jan 9, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Party Pack

What is a party pack of Midol? Is it a really big bag of it or do the Midol come individually packaged? Also should I have them at my next party?

by DonFrancisco on Jan 9, 2009 2:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Naruto_rasengan_by_kishoto_small
The Day of Depth- An analysis of current injuries and their effects on our depth
Aaiu088_bob-sanders-posters_small
THE STATE OF THE TEXANS: WEEK 9 EDITION
Peyton_dungy_small
Perception altering Reality: Why the Colts are better than the Saints
No_1_small
Power Rankings - Week 9 - Final Update
Medium_jabe_small
One For the Ladies - The NFL's Best Looking Offense

Recent FanPosts

Makeitpersonal_small
Run Game
100_1550_small
Chiefs Release Larry Johnson
Snid160_small
What is up with Pierre Garçon?
Champ_small
Five Things I Think I Know: Week 9 Edition
Novemberdecember_2007-115_small
MarkFive's 5 Points
Small
5 Big Things, Houston @ Indy Edition
Tlbux4_small
Good Game Houston
Small
PRE GAME Manning Facts
Small
LATE NIGHT THREAD
Bobzilla_small
Just to clear things up

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editor

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Contributing Writers

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Seyton_manning_feature_small KingRichard

Change_small Colts Homer