Week 5 Advanced Stat Roundup
The Colts hold on to the #4 spot again in DVOA, but take over as #1 in DAVE (27% preseason projection this week) as preseason favorite San Diego has fallen into the bottom of the league in DVOA thanks to a through gutting of their interior line by injury and by more recent DAVE favorite Baltimore falling in the DVOA ratings for a second straight week after a second straight losing performance.
The odds the Colts don't make the playoffs is now under 1% according to FO or in other words nearly 4 times less likely than the Colts going 16-0 (3%). They also give the Colts a 96.4% chance of re-claiming the AFC South title, a 85.3% chance of a 1st round bye, a 42.4% chance of an AFC title and a 24.7% chance of winning the Superbowl.
Advanced NFL Stats efficiency numbers grow more enamored with the Colts each week. The Colts remain the firm #1 in the rankings with a 86% probability of beating an average team on a neutral field. They are very close to claiming not just the #1 spot in offense, but they sit at #2 defensively as well, with a pass D that ranks 2nd to the Giants and a league average run D. The Colts have been the 5th least penalized team in the league.
More DVOA than you can shake a stick at after the jump.
The Colts Offense has the top overall rating in the league, and is the #1 passing O. The Colts broke into the top half of rushing Os now at 15th in the league. On defense they hop up a spot to 8th in the league, with the #5 pass D and #22 run D.
Over to individual players Peyton had a slightly down week and is no longer on pace for the 2nd most DYAR and 2nd highest DVOA of the last 15 years. He's only on pace for 3rd in DYAR (to Brady's 07 and his own 04) and 4th in DVOA (to his 04, Brady's 07, Boomer Esiason's 97).
BBS' piece on the lack of basis behind any Addai bashing this year was well timed as DVOA was pleased with Joseph's day against the Titans (or the opponent adjustments up'ed the value for his previous games). Addai now ranks 14th both in DYAR and DVOA. Brown still lags a bit behind Addai overall, but he rose as well (his DVOA is now nearly positive), now the owner of 14 entire defense adjusted yards above replacement as opposed the single lonely DYAR he had last week. My perception of Brown as less consistent that Addai has moved even further into the wrong, as Brown has passed up Addai in success rate at 52% to Addai's 50% (11th and 14th in the league respectively). Over on the receiving end Addai has caught an amazing 93% of his targets (26 of 28). Donald Brown still doesn't have much of a sample (only 9 targets), but he made a TON of those few. He would rank 1st in receiving DVOA if the cutoff was lowered to 9 targets instead of 10.
Like last week the Colts have two top 15 WRs in both DVOA and DYAR, unlike last week it's Austin Collie (13th DYAR, 10th DVOA) joining Reggie Wayne (3rd DYAR, 11th DVOA), instead of Pierre Garcon (38th DYAR, 27th DVOA). Collie has caught 71% of his targets, Wayne 67%, Garcon 52% (though Pierre is the only one of the 3 averaging over 10 yards a target so the lower catch rate is at least partly excusable).
At tight end Dallas Clark overtook the idle Antonio Gates, and surprise DVOA superstar Brent Celek for the top spot in DYAR. He ranks 9th in DVOA and has caught a blistering 83% of his (46) targets. Second on the team only to Addai (who has 20 less targets).
Despite an Ugoh scare the Colts line ranks 2nd in adjusted sack rate. The running game looked a bit improved as well with the Colts nearly entering the top half of the league in adjusted line yards, reaching 12th in power success and making the sub-par 10+ yard run% and stuffed% numbers a bit prettier. Looking at directional success the Colts run relatively well up the middle and behind left tackle, but have some trouble going wide either way and can't get much of anything going behind right tackle.
On the DL the Colts rank 11th in adjusted sack rate. The numbers tell an expected story in run D. Sub par overall. Terrible at stopping power situation runs, rarely get RBs in the backfield, but they're allowing few big plays. Directionally the sides a pretty balanced (with the offensive left, manned by Freeney's looking a bit better than Mathis' offensive right), but inside-out is a very large split with league average success on the edges and a 30th ranking between the guards.
On special teams the Colts are in the top half of the league. Kickoff coverage has been top 5 in the league (when did you ever think you'd hear that), with punt coverage slightly above average, and a bit below average ratings on returns and FG/XPs canceling out the positives for their overall ranking of 16th.
0 recs |
33 comments
|
Comments
I thought the defense would be higher
but I’m not sure how DVOA accounts for garbage time TDs (Seattle), and I’m sure Miami still does not look too impressive. I think Miami will get better, so that performance will look more and more impressive as the year goes on.
EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!
by dmstorm22 on Oct 14, 2009 1:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of the Giants...
I know everyone is in love with the Saints (I haven’t gotten a chance to see them play), but what about a Manning Superbowl? Ala Sunday night opener a few years ago.
by Colts Syndrome on Oct 14, 2009 2:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I feel like the Manning Super Bowl
is too good to be true.
However, I do think they are the best team in the NFC. However, I believe in the Saints D, so I could see them too.
EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!
by dmstorm22 on Oct 14, 2009 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What does DVOA and DAVE stand for?
Please define your acronyms before using them extensively.
Thanks
"Anyone who uses the signature line is potentially homosexual. Not that there is anything wrong with that." - Vince Lombardi
by peterbones on Oct 14, 2009 2:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well using teh Google...
I found out DAVE is a 1993 movie directed by Ivan Reitman, staring Kevin Kline, Sigourney Weaver, Frank Langella. It has a rating of 6.8/10 at IMDB.com, which means that it isn’t the greatest movie, but isn’t the worst one either.
I also found out DVOA is is a non-profit organization founded in 1967 and is the oldest civilian orienteering club in the United States. No, really!
So Shakes, why do we care what some club in Pennsylvania thinks about football? HMM???
Go Colts!
by Marked Hoosier on Oct 14, 2009 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liked the movie Dave
Kline had a great dual role as philandering prez and his stand-in after the prez died (IIRC). Predictably, the first lady fell for him. Lightweight for presidential fare, but fun.
Okay… where we re?
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Oct 14, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kline is a great actor...
and went to THE University of Indiana! :D
Go Colts!
by Marked Hoosier on Oct 14, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's THE Indiana University.
Not the other way around.
by HoosierHorseman on Oct 14, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hangs head in shame… shows self to the door
Go Colts!
by Marked Hoosier on Oct 14, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
DVOA
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2005/evolving-predictive-powers-dvoa
As long as we have Peyton we will always have a chance to win.
by skywalker on Oct 14, 2009 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
also
notice this is week 5 advanced stat round up. they were defined in the very beginning. please do a little more searching before berating someone for not defining some acronyms.
As long as we have Peyton we will always have a chance to win.
by skywalker on Oct 14, 2009 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you’re telling readers “tough luck” and that they have to go figure out what things mean on their own, then you’re just going to have readers skip over it. That’s like a newspaper not explaining something because they mentioned it a month ago.
by hoosierdore on Oct 14, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
Like writing any paper, you should always say the actual words before breaking it into an acronym. I never know what you’re taking about, but I assume having players ranked for these things is a good thing.
by hoosierdore on Oct 14, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, to back this up, FO (Football Outsiders) reviews terms at the head of most articles
Not exhaustively, but enough so the new arrivals don’t feel like they just stepped into an Advanced Latin 401 class. All it takes is about 8 lines of text….
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Oct 14, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess as long as the Colts don’t have to play the Chargers in the playoffs, they’ll probably make it to the Super Bowl. And the way that the Giants are playing…Now I’m just saying. How awesome would it be to call Super Bowl XLIV, The Manning Bowl?
by shirley on Oct 14, 2009 4:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I hope this year
if the opportunity presents itself, the Colts will be allowed to try for 16-0.
I remember the 13-3 year, when Dungy decided to rest his starters in the final games he said “No one will remember a 16-0 team, but they always remember a Super Bowl champion”. But I disagree. Stat-happy NFL fans ALWAYS remember a perfect season.
Plus, it, not like resting our starters ever worked out positively for the Colts. And surely they will have the bye week to rest.
I believe that NFL teams owe it to their fans to play their best every week.
And a Super Bowl win WITH a perfect season would be remembered thru the ages.
by HoosierHorseman on Oct 14, 2009 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Way too early to think about this
not to mention, after watching the Patriots lose the SB two years ago, I can’t help but assume that some of that was due to the pressure of having the perfect season. I’d rather us lose a game here or there* and win the big one because we’re focused on winning the big one and not being perfect.
*I’ll eat a plate of liver and onions if we go 19-0.
How can you not love a team that does this?
by LovinBlue on Oct 14, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's why I said
IF the opportunity presents itself.
But I get your point.
I only brought it up because the odds of going 16-0 were mentioned in the post.
by HoosierHorseman on Oct 14, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not saying it's going to happen...
…but I don’t see a game on the schedule where we will be the underdog. Maybe @ Baltimore, but we seem to have their number. Obviously, the odds of going 16-0 are remote and require a great deal of luck, but it’s not impossible.
by invisibulman on Oct 14, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better 13-3 than 18-1
http://www.bustedtees.com/18-1 – Two years later and still a strong seller! I know I never get tired of referring to the ’07 Pats as the Best Team Ever To Lose the Super Bowl.
We can debate about “resting the starters” and if it actually does any good, but Tony was right to do what he thought was best to win the Lombardi Trophy. There’s no trophy for 16-0.
Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
by szquirrel on Oct 14, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can you say it was the right thing to do?
We lost the first game of the playoffs that year.
And the year we won it all we didn’t have a bye.
by HoosierHorseman on Oct 14, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just to clarify
You do remember that Dungy didn’t rest the starters when we were still undefeated, right? We played our guys and lost to San Diego to go 13-1. Then we rested our starters after the loss (and following the tragic death of Dungy’s son).
This isn’t to counter your point of trying to go 16-0, which I’d love but seriously doubt will happen. I was just making sure that no one thinks the team rested the starters while we were still undefeated. The Chargers beat us first.
by coltsfanawalt on Oct 14, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True...
but having watched that game I’m not sure it made a difference whether the starters played or not. The Colts seemed totally disinterested in winning, having clinched the #1 seed the week prior.
by invisibulman on Oct 14, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
Then again, perhaps we cared about that game like we did the two times since that the Chargers beat us in the playoffs. Even the year before, when Manning broke the TD record, it seemed like San Diego gave us utter fits. My take is that the Chargers have become to us the pain that the Pats used to be each year. It’s time we turned the tables and crushed the Chargers.
by coltsfanawalt on Oct 14, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
VINATIERI is out for
6 weeks because he is in need of nee surgery (clean up the nee from his last surgery). expected to sign stover today. this is from schefter on sportscenter this morning
by ANGELSFAITH on Oct 14, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sheet
I knew we should have kept Andrus… if only we had learned this one week ago!
How can you not love a team that does this?
by LovinBlue on Oct 14, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
im suprized they didn't try
mabye they coulnt but he hasn’t been 100% at any point this season. they keept a backup kicker in andrus as long as possible but i guess they couln’t hold onto him any longer :(
by ANGELSFAITH on Oct 14, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
fanshot up
Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
by shake n bake on Oct 14, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea just saw it and commented :) thanks i tried to make a fanshot not
knowing if i could and it didn’t work.
by ANGELSFAITH on Oct 14, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stover is good
Sort of Vinny-lite. Actually, maybe even better…
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Oct 14, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















