Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Interested in hearing your take...

...on the ESPN documentary that aired last night (Tuesday) and re-airs this Thursday evening called, "The Band That Wouldn't Die' about the Baltimore Colts Marching Band that endured 12 long years without the NFL until we got the Ravens/Browns.

I know there are real hard feelings from both Baltimore and Cleveland towards the cities that "took" their teams. Baltimore doesn't hate Indy so much as they were just the recipient as Robert Irsay was moving the Colts back then but he continually lied and said he wasn't moving the team.

Browns' owner Art Modell pleaded with the city of Cleveland then had no other choice in his mind and if not Baltimore, would surely have gone elsewhere. While we understand Cleveland's anger, it cannot compare to us having the team snuck out of town in the middle of a snowy night and being overlooked for expansion (Jacksonville, Carolina- are you kidding me!?) for so many years. Two were long enough for the Browns fans, but could you stand to see your name and colors gone as well for over a decade with no NFL team to root for?

In case you're interested, here's the link to the article I did on Baltimore Beatdown about this documentary. Open to hearing your thoughts on it as both us, you and Indy should be the ones who could relate the most.

[Editor's Note: Bruce is the head writer at Baltimore Beatdown, one of the better football blogs in SB nation's network. Please rec this FanPost so it can stay at the top for a little while. --bbs]

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.

Comment 128 comments  |  9 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm interested in your take on Matt Stover being signed by the Colts today

posted a fanshot over on BB

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 14, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

We loved Matt

and many want him back, but to me he is a shell of the guy he once was. His distance is less and less and beyond the 40 he is no given to even get it that far, and his kick offs land around the 20 yard line.

But he was a great guy a great teammate and a great player, and we wish him luck but please, please do not hit the game winner against us later this year.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 14, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha cool

but the way peyton is throwing and the rest of the team is catching up to that greatness i think we wont need a game winner it will be over at half time

by thebossuzzi on Oct 14, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Frankly...

I am sick and tired of hearing about the move. It was 25 years ago, time for Baltimore to move on.

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 14, 2009 11:44 AM EDT reply actions  

+10 billion

Seriously, Why would I want to rec this? I am so over this whole topic.
Time to move on Baltimore…

by yellowsnow on Oct 14, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Rec it

Because Bruce, a good writer, is looking for comments like the one you just made.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Oct 14, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

+25

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Oct 14, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can i speak for everyone

when I say that I think we are all sick of hearing about it?

So much time and energy wasted dwelling on something that is in the past. I feel for anyone who had to see their football team leave town. I know it would be hard for me to accept it if the Colts would leave………….but they have another team!!!!!!! embrace what you have and let it go. You only make yourself crazy worrying about things no one can do anything about.

by MARVININDY on Oct 14, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not only do they have another team

but they have a DAMN GOOD team. They have absolutly nothing to complain about. If they Colts had stayed there whos to say theyd be as good as they are now? Geez its time to stop cryin over spilt milk. It happened 25 damn years ago there’s nothing people in Baltimore can say or do thats gonna bring the colts back

The way our defense is set up, it puts me in situations where I'm one-on-one in making tackles on running backs. When I go into it, I think I am going to win. It really doesn't matter the size, height, weight, whatever. I'm not afraid of putting my body in there." - Bob Sanders

by coltsfan723 on Oct 15, 2009 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

My feelings exactly. + a million

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 15, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still crying after 25 years

"Brett Favre was a man who thought he was retired, but he knew it wouldn't last."

by Colts Homer on Oct 14, 2009 11:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Guys, .....hello?

I just want to hear your take on the documentary. No need to debate the move and the emotions like the Browns site is dumping all over me.

Not crying as the Ravens are our team. The crying you see is for the emotions of that time. Try losing your name, colors and team for 12 years. How would you feel if you woke up tomorrow and found out your team just moved to another city? That’s all I’m interested in debating.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 14, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bruce, we get it. It's awful to lose a team.....

especially a team with such a strong history and tradition as the Baltimore Colts. But, didn’t a lot of the move have to do with threats of imminent domain and lack of attendance? The city of Baltimore needs to take some of the responsibility. It’s always a shame and I feel bad for the people who went through it at the time, but lots of teams move. The Colts weren’t the only one who moved during that era, but this particular move seems to get the most attention. Just remember, the current Colts players and the Indy fans had nothing to do with the move. We are just supporting the home team. Wouldn’t you too?

by Ayrshire on Oct 14, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

All the legal stuff came when

Irsay was visiting other cities and still promising he wasn’t moving the team and would work out deal to stay in town. Attendance was down because he and GM Joe Thomas decimated this team and took us from a winner to a loser that even John Elway didn’t want to play for. We’re not entirely free of blame as a city, but the way he did it is the reason for the “drama.”

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, at least you admit that

I think the people of Baltimore are upset with the Irsay family mostly. Indy just happens to be associated with the bad memories of that time…..for many of them. But, again, it’s not the people of Indianapolis’ fault. They’re supporting the Colts who are now in town. And, I"m not telling you to get over it. I’m sure many are not able to. You can take it to the grave with you if you want. Just remember it’s Robert Irsay that you hate.

by Ayrshire on Oct 15, 2009 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That city still needs therapy??

They need to embrace Harbaugh and Flacco and co. Theirs is a good team. Until this past decade, they were missing very little in the lousy Colts team (with an occasional exception). Since then they’ve won a super bowl with the Ravens and have fielded one of the better teams in the league pretty consistently.

Why some people won’t let this die in a league where many teams have changed cities through the years, well it’s just slightly disturbing. I know that they will say that it’s because of how it happened with Irsay, but the general point is that they were hurt at the time for losing their team. That was just a specific point at which to vent their frustrations.

It’s like a couple getting a divorce. They can gripe about the particulars and how things are done by the other, but that is just par for the course. The bottom line is that they are getting a divorce, which is a pretty big circumstance in a relationship that has gone far from their original intentions. Any time a couple is divorcing, there are hurts in the relationship and faults to find with the other. Blame will be assigned by each toward the other. That is to be expected when a relationship of that magnitude falls apart. All the particular blah-blahs will vary some, but there will always be blah-blahs. The main point is that they lost a relationship and that leaves a scar.

Same with the city of Baltimore. They aren’t the first city to lose an NFL team to relocation, and they aren’t the first city to be bummed out about it. Every time there were reasons why. Every time there were people in that city who didn’t care much about supporting the team. And every time there were fans who were die hard types, and those fans died a little when their team left them for greener pastures.

So why are some in Baltimore so traumatized by this over twenty five years later? Or any time past the point of getting another franchise (interestingly, a franchise that went trough a nasty divorce of their own before coming to them)? Go figure. They can keep the blah-blahs going forever of why their loss was worse than any other city has experienced, and how their ex should be hated forever for this, but that is just a sad way to live.

It’s like two divorced people now married to each other, where the one keeps talking about their issues with their ex who broke their hearts in a most grievous manner many years earlier. Probably at some point before twenty-five years later, the new spouse is gonna start to wonder if they can just move on and be happy with what they have now. My sympathies are with the Baltimore Ravens organization. They would’ve hoped that time and their efforts would have helped everyone move on by now. Maybe if they win five more super bowls for the city…

by coltsfanawalt on Oct 14, 2009 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Sorry if you missed it but

this is all about how the team was SNUCK out of the city after the owner promised he wasn’t moving it! Of course other teams have left but NONE left that way. How would you feel under those same circumstances? Is this to much of an effort to try to imagine that? Sorry.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 14, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Didn't miss it

Come on it has nothing to do with what time the Colts left night or day it’s the fact they left. What I remember that hasn’t even been mentioned is wasn’t Bob at on time during all this threatened by the city of Baltimore to claim ultimate domain in which case he stood a chance of losing what was in all fairness his.
Isn’t true that he had been asking for a new stadium,a decent field for the team to play on even before the other sports organization in the city ask for it but yet they received theirs,and really that is one of the reason they left.

by Ufanforreal on Oct 15, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Poor timeline of facts

Eminent Domain issue only came AFTER Irsay was obviously planning the move yet insisting he wasn’t and we didn’t want to lose it as he was refusing to talk about staying, new stadium or not. The city built the Orioles Stadium in 1991 (moved in ’92), over 7 years AFTER Irsay left.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry if you missed it but

this is all about what has happened to many teams throughout time, like the Cleveland Browns and many others. Of course we’d be sad and upset if the Colts left tomorrow. Under any conditions. Is that your big point?

The slobber about how they left is pathetic, however. My whole point is that it’s irrelevant. There was no way for them to leave without disappointing the faithful. How they left is just a venting point. It is so bizzare that it makes a big splash. But the point is that they left.

I enjoy the comments below, which you have failed to respond to, about why Irsay would want to leave. And the imminent domain point, that is most interesting. It’s tiring to hear Baltimore fans tell only their side of the story and stay worked up twenty-five years later.

If your whole point is that we’d be upset if we woke up tomorrow to find the Colts gone, then yes. However, two things you need to realize when following this logic. First, we would have less right to be so bothered if our city had treated the Colts organization as the city of Baltimore had. You know, the parts of the story that didn’t make the pro-Baltimore propaganda piece that was written by bitter old people who wanted to fire at the Colts under the guise of a feel good story. If it’s such a feel good story, why is it stirring up ill will towards the Irsays and the Colts primarily. Pretty fishy.

Second, while we may be upset day one, I’d hope that twenty-five years later, after we had another respectable team for whom to cheer for the past dozen years and who had won us a super bowl during that time, well, we’d be able to move on and get over it. Perhaps count ourselves as part of that great number of cities who had lost a franchise and eventually got another one. Sheesh. This didn’t just happen. Get a psychiatrist or something.

by coltsfanawalt on Oct 15, 2009 3:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, talk about out of touch...

…Baltimore is way over the Colts leaving and wouldn’t consider taking them, the colors or the name back 25 years later. Most of the info you read is media generated for mass fan appeal but most fans were too young to remember all of that. Read some of my above comments to see the Eminent Domain inaccuracies you and others speak about, as well as why the team moved and porr attendance issues.

But yes, that’s all we wanted to discuss, the feelings of what it was like to lose a team in the manner we did. That’s it. Time to move on.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

But you haven't moved on,

otherwise you wouldn’t be here. Crying over what happened 25 yrs. ago.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 15, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just asking about a ESPN documentary

Nothing more. Trust me, I’m over it, the Colts are YOUR team, the Ravens OURS. Just the show, that’s it.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's about old people...

…complaining about change. The Dodgers and Giants both still here about it, and almost everyone who remembers those two being on the East Coast is dead and buried. The only reason this still comes up in the national press (read:ESPN) is that it happened to an East Coast team.

by vintagephoenix on Oct 14, 2009 1:29 PM EDT reply actions  

bingo vintgephoenix

Eastern Seaboard Programming Network…..wonder why this got aired???

by harbaughmyhero on Oct 14, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gee, wonder what you'll say about

the rest of the 20 other stories that are part of the ESPN 30 at 30 series. That will be interesting to hear your theory about that!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 14, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let me help then.

The Gretsky piece was ok, but I think the way to go would have been a story about the mass loss of Canadian Hockey teams instead of just bemoaning the loss of their Jordan. This won’t happen because any attempt to a story about that would morph into a story about the Hartford Whalers.
I wonder if they’ll tell the tale of the loss of class basketball in Indiana? Oh wait, they’ll just end up asking what Kobe or Lebron, or maybe Brett Farve what they think instead.

by vintagephoenix on Oct 14, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Conspiracy

Maybe now that ESPN can’t exalt the Pats effectively over the Colts, they are trying to bring the Colts PR down to the level the Pats suffered a couple years back. Remember when their players were booed in the pro bowl following spygate and 18-1?

That’s it! It’s a conspiracy, a conspiracy I say! I have to go now. The black helicopters are spying on me at this moment.

by coltsfanawalt on Oct 14, 2009 1:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Baltimore should get over it.

They have a fantastic football team to love now. It’s been a long time, doesn’t time heal all wounds?

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 14, 2009 5:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Lori

Hopefully, you’ve never been wounded. Perhaps a passionate sports fan can imagine the pain this incident caused and that’s all the documentary tried to show. You want everyone to get over anything that caused pain? Sorry, but it just doesn’t work that way. But trust me, most people in Baltimore wouldn’t take the Colts back if they left Indy. However, you’d hate whatever city that did and would probably cry if the Colts now left in the middle of the night from Indy.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 14, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought you wanted opinons.

It was nothing personal.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 14, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW-I don't cry over FOOTBALL.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 14, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I cry over football!

Colts loses have that affect on me. Anyway, Baltimore did go without football for 12 years, but they have now had a team now going on 14?!? The team is old enough for puberty and they are still whining.

FUCK OFF BALTIMORE.

/thinks about our last loss and tears up again… :,(

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 14, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very classy and

a great show of your intelligence. You must be a great debater.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ask me if I care...

come on, ask. Please.

You come here wanting us to feel sorry for you, while you stole another team.

Nope, not feeling it, at all.

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 15, 2009 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

um... I do

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Oct 15, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have a teenager- he's hardened me. LOL

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 15, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

But they won't

Because Indianapolis fans actually go to the games.

They left because nobody was going to the games at all and the city tried to fuck them over.

If Baltimore fans bothered to show up more than 3000 at a time, they’d still be the Baltimore Colts.

by willyduer on Oct 15, 2009 12:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm....wonder why they didn't go....

….perhaps it was a drunk owner who wanted to make more money so he traded all the good and big name players and even the #1 draft pick didn’t want to come here,….but that is still not part of the purpose of this post, which is whether or not you liked or did not like the show.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Elway...

was an immature prick and actually would have signed if someone didn’t screw it up at the last minute (according to Accorsi, anyway).

Elway and Eli both acted like babies; You can’t turn that around and blame the team.

And stop making excuses. The team was awful forever in Indy too but people still showed up.

by willyduer on Oct 15, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't see it yesterday

And I don’t really plan on seeing it tomorrow. I think we all were a little take aback by the way Baltimore acted during the 2006 playoff game. Ravens fans didn’t just want their team to beat the Colts- they wanted to throttle them, massacre them, destroy them, eat them for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, etc, etc. And then displaying the scoreboard as “Ravens vs. Indianapolis”….wow. I never really realized how passionate Baltimore was about the Colts moving until that game. Afterwards, I got really annoyed by the constant whining. Like other fans, I simply said, “It happened 25 years ago, so get over it”.

However, more recently I’ve come to sympathize with Baltimore. Obviously, Bob Irsay was a drunk idiot and was the worst owner imaginable. Indy fans should consider themselves lucky to have class acts like Jim Irsay and Herb Simon as the owners of their pro sports teams. Baltimore didn’t have that luxury at the time. What they had was a owner who was full of BS and flat-out betrayed them.

That’s the reason I’m so perplexed as to why Baltimore seems to have something against Indianapolis. Sure, they agreed with Irsay to bring the Colts here. But what was nothing personal to the city of Baltimore. All they wanted was to bring in some more revenue to the city. Bob Irsay was the culprit then and he always has been. I understand the passion and I understand the hatred, but I just wish the two cities could get along once and for all. Let’s put the past behind us, shake hands, and agree together that Bob Irsay was a schmuck. Is that so hard?

by Aerostar193 on Oct 14, 2009 7:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Very well said

and we for the most part totally agree. The media loves to bring it up and touch those nerves that most of the older fans still remember but most of the younger ones as well as the true Ravens fans have moved on. It was all about THAT time, not now. The Ravens use of the scoreboard to not use the Colts name was silly.

However, like that Colts game in 2006, our team and fans want to destroy, torment, beatdown EVERY team, not just the Colts. And for the most paart in 2006, other than of course the Colts, we did.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

OH COME ON PLEASE

look i wasnt able to see the whole thing but saw parts of both airings so far. i understand that it would be hard and it sucks especially for the fans of that team at the time the ones like us now that are so in love with our team. i do think that it was interesting there reactions and just here there take on it.
OH and anyone who thinks they think it is only them that have had this happen the director of the move was one of the big fans of that team and he didn’t write it as a pitty thing adn understands that other teams have moved but the diffrence is the way it happened and that this unlike many others had a visual and was memorable in the method it happend.

we dont know and i think thought that they have moved on at least mostly but this is the story of what happend not them complaining so calm down guys

by TheAngelsColts on Oct 14, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Over it?

Ask a Colts player what happens whenever we go there.

by vintagephoenix on Oct 14, 2009 11:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

My take is

that Bruce Raffel is a douche. Go troll somewhere else.

by MarshallPlan on Oct 14, 2009 8:03 PM EDT reply actions  

he's not a troll

he’s the lead editor for the Raven’s blog

by MarkFive05 on Oct 14, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

So?

BBS being our editor doesn’t mean he’s not a troll :)

(Just kidding. This person is misusing the term troll, obviously.)

by willyduer on Oct 15, 2009 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

BUT WHY DON'T YOU AGREE WITH HIM???

They went through the wasteland of being football-less 14 years ago!

WHY DON’T YOU FEEL THEIR PAIN!

oh and exnay on the rownbey eamtey tealsay.

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 15, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because most of them are missing the point

and falling right into that “get over it” mentality that I agree with and am.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

So what do you really want?

Our opinion is overwhelming that we fell bad the team had to leave you guys, but that 25 years later we are tired of hearing about it.

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 15, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

You had to know this would happen.

You want our take on the documentary. Here’s mine, Well done.
But coming here and getting defensive over comments is a waste of your time. What did you expect?

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 15, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

and a douche. Don't forget that part.

From Urban Dictionary:
Troll
 1a. Noun
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.
 

by MarshallPlan on Oct 15, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, such classy fans you guys have...

And this coming from someone who loves the colts 2nd to the Ravens. But you guys didn’t go through it, so relax a little bit on us. It hurt, in fact, it hurt like hell. We aren’t blaming you guys, you guys are awesome fans. However when there are things on TV like a documentary about the band, it pings our hearts just a little bit. So forgive Bruce for so RUDELY coming over here and asking your opinion of the documentary, and you all going nuts about the old issues…. that was not the point.

I guess it is too much to ask to try and have a cordial relationship with other SB nation blogs without the name calling and vicious comments. Hey, at least we have the Steelers. We can always count on them for a little hatred.

Number 20, I mean, that guy is superman, for real. - Derrick Mason

by JenD on Oct 15, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey we have class here.

Lots of people here talk civilly with other fans. We have a steeler fan who shows up a lot in gameday threads, and we have fun with him. I have had very great talks with Jaguar fans at their site.

Rexx seems to be a quick temper with a hair trigger, and we have people who will respond in kind. But come on, our own head blogger asked to get this fanpost recommended, and the site followed suit. Sounds to me like there are some cordial people here…

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 15, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not me

I have no class. I even booed that 12 year old Pats fan at the playoff game couple years ago.

by MarshallPlan on Oct 15, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

well you are the exception to the rule. Ok? heh…

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 15, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Same here.

(grins sheepishly)

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I'm pretty sure there was a whole lot of swearing when this gem was first produced.

by Cassieper on Oct 18, 2009 4:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm going to try my best to describe how I see the whole thing. Sorry for being so long.

I saw most of the documentary and it was entertaining. I was in marching band in highschool and so I’m a fan of bands, that is why I watched it, not because of the Baltimore Colts.

This is how I think Baltimore citizens and fans see it:

They were the most loyal fans any team could ever have. They sold out the stadium each and every game (after the team was originally taken away from them for low attendance). In return the players of the team was a major part of the city. The players owned clubs and businesses and they were very bluecollar in how they interacted with their fans. Something that any hardworking person can relate with.

Then Bob Irsay lied to them. Time and time again. He said he was not in Phoenix discussing possible relocation, when he actually was. Phoenix actually made a public statement the day after he said that disclaiming that they were pulling out of discussions with Bob Irsay. He said that he was not going to move the team and then in the middle of the night, with no warning, Mayflower trucks rolled out of Baltimore and into Indy.

Now that is enough to warrant being mad, but then here is where it gets really bad. Even though the Colts were not in Baltimore anymore they did not give up on the team. The band stayed together (putting the director of the band into debt; he had to mortgage his house etc etc) and the city of Baltimore loved when they marched. Apparently so did other towns (even Philly who booed Santa Claus). Basically the city of Baltimore was showing the world that they wanted another team. But they got passed up on, twice.

But finally they were awarded the Browns franchise and the rest is History.

Here is the Colts’ fans perspective:

We don’t care! What happened happened. It’s in the past and it is history. We get it, you’re upset. Bad things happened, but now is the perfect time to build a bridge and get over it. If anything we should be the ones to be upset. Our Lombardi Trophy is sitting in Baltimore and not Indy.

by MarkFive05 on Oct 14, 2009 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Thank you

You are one of the few that get it. That was all I was trying to point out that the story was about, not to regurgitate the bad feelings that neither team should now have since the passing of the elder Irsay. We have nothing against Indy and most true football fans, including the Ravens, know that Johnny U. would love watching Peyton who is such a class guy and one of the best ever.

BTW, which Lombardi Trophy are you talking about? The 1971 Super Bowl that says, “BaltimoreColts?” Why would you even want it? Baltimore doesn’t want the 1964 NFL Championship Trophy that sits in Cleveland.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Johnny U. is one of the biggest Colts haters of them all.

Also, your second paragraph is a perfect example of why people thing your trolling.

by vintagephoenix on Oct 15, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dont agree

Jonny U. didn’t hate the colts wise he most likley would have wanted nothing to do with them ore manning and wouldn’t have presented him with that award years back

by TheAngelsColts on Oct 15, 2009 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heh…

anyone want to laugh, look at the number off rings Peyton has for all his stats. As many as Dilfer.

by raven on Oct 14, 2009 10:49 PM EDT reply actions  

microwave popcorn – 2.50
big screen tv – 1000
watching the colts go to baltimore and kick the ravens up and down the field – Priceless

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 14, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

This argument also seems fallacious to me.

If in fact you are inferring that Dilfer is just as good as Manning because he has the same amount of Super Bowl rings. It is abundantly obvious that Dilfer’s job as QB of the Ravens was to “manage the game” (admittedly, this term could be unpacked differently) and allow the defense to dominate. As most fans know, Manning is integral to the Colts and is the primary reason the team wins on gameday. I think we both would agree every team would pick Manning to run their offense over Dilfer even if he had 3 rings.

It would be like taking John Paxson over Reggie Miller because Paxson has 3 rings.

by orex121 on Oct 14, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jim Irsay is a silver spoon kid. I have more respect for his dad who actually earned money the good old fashioned flim flaming way. I never missed the Colts because you got the Irsays in the deal. Worth 12 years to me.

by raven on Oct 14, 2009 10:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly! And let me tell you that party was great. We had all sorts of beef and pies and we even scammed Best Buy to deliver a TV for one night and returned it because it “wasn’t loud enough”. Oh, we had dips and wings and brawts and dogs and cheezy poofs. Danced into the night and weeee hours of the morning. It was just tremendous.

by raven on Oct 15, 2009 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah,

but you still live in Baltimore.

by willyduer on Oct 15, 2009 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whoa there,

Don’t come here and put down Indy, those are fighting words here.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 15, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Have you ever been to Indy?

Indianapolis residents can walk around downtown without worrying about getting shot. Baltimore has a nice looking inner harbor but otherwise is barely better than Cleveland and Detroit.

by willyduer on Oct 15, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

classy

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Oct 15, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Longtime Luker and I love this site

But I just wanted to say this regarding Bob Irsay and the move:

Granted, leaving at midnight was a less than classy move by Bob. However, the fact of the matter is, Irsay was leaving Baltimore, irregardless. Could he have left in a better way? Of course! I am sure that even Mayor Hudnut desired him to leave Baltimore on better terms, as long as he left for Indy. I can even admit, as an Indy native, I was too overjoyed at the idea of having a professional football team to care if they left surreptitiously in the middle of the night or if the city of Baltimore threw a ticker tape parade while the moving vans motored out of the city. We were now a major league city with 2 pro teams and I was ebullient. However, I can imagine that if i woke up tomorrow and heard the Colts left for sunny California I would be livid and heartbroken. Therefore, I feel your dismay.

Yet, I think it is only fair that Baltimore fans admit that even if the Colts had left Baltimore in broad daylight and in a public fashion where the owner gave the city full disclosure, Baltimore fans would still be livid with Bob Irsay , Hudnut, and maybe even Indy. You lost your team. That is the locus of your animosity not how they left. In philosophical terms we are talking about a difference in degree not kind. Therefore to harp on what time the team left and how clandestine it the departure was does a disservice to your argument and ultimately leads you to the reductio ad absurdum arguments with Browns fans on whose team departure was worse. That is like two parents arguing who hurts more at the death of their child.

I admire the Ravens and Ozzie Newsome he is a great GM, almost as good as Polian in my estimation :). I even empathize with the loss of your former franchise and understand your disdain for Bob Irsay. However, Jim Irsay is not his father, and I really believe he is one of the classiest owners in the league (yes I know he does have issues, but who doesn’t) and we have a great franchise here that represents this city well. Luckily for Baltimore, you have a new franchise that represents your city too. Perhaps we can agree on that.

by orex121 on Oct 14, 2009 11:08 PM EDT reply actions  

All very fair responses

and for the most part, I agree with your assessment. That’s all I was ever hoping for from the majority, but silly me….

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wanna know why some call you a "troll"?
That’s all I was ever hoping for from the majority, but silly me….

It’s that little dig at us. As a Head Writer, you know this language is what causes flames in threads.

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 15, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree..and I was a Redskins Steelers fan during all that : ) I couldn’t get Baltimore stations on my black and white tin foil antenna TV. We had 3 clear stations and channel 5 had the Skins and channel 4 always had the Steelers. Pick your poison.

BUT, if i were in Baltimore at the time NONE of this would have ever happened. You see, we had guys like Bruce living here at the time and they hid under the beds when the trucks rolled out. I mea, at least save the colors and names. If the band could only fight! Now, that would be a great movie. DEATH MARCH- The Baltimore Raven Band Story.

by raven on Oct 14, 2009 11:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Indy...

I wouldn’t be angry at the Colts for leaving Indy under the following circumstances. I’d help them pack.

The Colts were unhappy with the condition of the stadium they played in and Indianapolis offered them a new indoor dome.
Robert Irsay, the Colts owner, had many problems with Baltimore and the stadium, Memorial stadium.

1. Due to being far from the downtown area and any major highway, traffic to and from Colt games was very heavy and tied up traffic and trapped locals in their homes. It was also hard to find being about seven miles fron the downtown area on 33rd street. Many fans got lost getting to or coming from the stadium.

2. The stadium was a very poor football stadium and the seating bowl ended at the fifty yard line, the end zone near 36th street was open taking away money making seats. It also no club level. It was far behind its time.

3. The city of Baltimore would not allow the Colts to play at the NFL’s usual start time at one. Instead, they started at two which by law. Sports events were not allow to start before two on Sundays. Because of this the Colts had a hard time being on national T.V.

4. The Orioles, the city’s baseball team, also used the stadium and had control over food sales, and parking fees even during football season despite the fact that both teams payed a rent fee.

5. The team was playing poorly and attentence went to about 20,000 in a stadium that could hold 60,000.

6. The city wanted to upgrade the stadium but both teams had different demands and the city could not make both happy so it did not upgrade the stadium.

In the spring of 1984 the Colts lease on the stadium was up and Irsay wanted a new stadium or to move. Instead of working out plans with Irsay, Maryland’s senate passed a law that allowed the state to take the team from him by the powers of eminemt domain. All that was needed was the law to pass by the House of Delegates. That was enough for Irsay to decide what to do. He moved his team Indianapols and its Hoosier Dome. Baltimore did however learn from its mistakes. When the Orioles said they had a lot of the same problems with the stadium (location and condition for example,) and threatened to move to Washington D.C., Baltimore built Oriole Park at Camden Yards . Just six years later they would build M&T Bank Stadium for a new NFL team, the Ravens.

by wcwills on Oct 15, 2009 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

thanks for the info but i still think most raven fans wont exept that just cause they dont want to i think many are too set in there ways at least

the ones that have felt it for a long time already but i do think they are holding things against the worng people none of the ones that made those decisions from the colts are around. if that was the case with the city then id think they should blame the city also

by TheAngelsColts on Oct 15, 2009 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you for saving my sanity (whats left of it),from my earlier post I spoke of the eminent domain case they were trying to pass and I thought that was the case, funny how that is never mentioned.

by Ufanforreal on Oct 15, 2009 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Once again, no problem with your facts, but....

..your timeline is very inaccurate. The Eminant Domain and building the new stadiums came AFTER Irsay’s intention of moving the team came out and he refused to discuss staying. With that in mind, the picture should clear up a bit for those reading it.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Considering a move...

is hardly evil or unique. Trying to seize the team, however, is. You seem to be acting like that was some noble and heroic move by the city. You’re also leaving out all the other things they denied, like minor dollars for renovations several times over. The battle between the two parties wasn’t 100% because Irsay was being a jerk. The city certainly didn’t help.

The Mayflower adventure looks bad, but given the threat from the city, it was the only option.

by willyduer on Oct 15, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

And it never fails to amuse me how much hate the Baltimore fans have for this all when they acquired their current team almost exactly the same way – asshole owner, shady silent negotiations, and deceit. The only thing missing was the trucks.

If someone came out and said “I don’t hate the Colts because they left, but I do hate them because Bob voted in favor of Carolina and Jacksonville in 93 after promising to endorse Baltimore” (which I believe is Unitas’s beef), I wouldn’t argue. That was kind of a dick move. But pretending that Irsay had a choice after being treated so poorly by Baltimore is disingenuous.

by willyduer on Oct 15, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again

All this film has done is stir up negative feelings toward the Colts organization. Not just Baltimore people, but football observers everywhere who would watch it and its one sided story. This has only been a Colts PR hit. And judging by the writers and producers, that’s exactly what their bitter old souls want. And some Baltimore fans couldn’t be more pleased either.

I agree with what Peyton Manning said after we beat the Ravens in our super bowl year. It’s time to move on. Many of the current players weren’t alive back then, and the ones who were born already were quite young. Why is it that they are treated with such disdain over things that they had absolutely nothing to do with. Time to move on.

And again, this isn’t the only team that has ever relocated. Baltimore has the Ravens. They need to be happy with that and let it go already.

by coltsfanawalt on Oct 15, 2009 3:09 AM EDT reply actions  

No, no, no

99% of Ravens fans are not upset with the Colts organization, just the owner. The ones who still hate the Colts do need to move on, and my only issue is not anything other than you always beat us and we want to beat you guys at least once in this Manning generation!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats not totally true look at the posters and such they have when we go

they still do have distain or many not all. also at the owner didn’t we just say Jim irsay had nothing to do with it it was his dad so why would u hate him anyway? i say there is no reason it is like if u have kids i hold your sins against them which isn’t right

by TheAngelsColts on Oct 15, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Are you not allowed to be a Colts fan anymore?

That’s what I never got. Physical location is not the only thing that determines what team you root for. If I move to Washington DC, does that mean I stop pulling for the Colts and have to start rooting for the Skins? If the Colts left Indy and moved somewhere else, I’m not sure it would affect me ALL that much. I’ve never been able to go to a game, I’ve never lived in Indy, and I don’t even live in Indiana anymore. I’d still root for P-Money, wherever he plays.

by slash196 on Oct 15, 2009 3:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Nice article..

but I have a complaint with Cleveland getting another team…

You made a comment with regards to both Carolina and Jacksonville….

Yet both of those teams have made the playoffs combined about a dozen times, both have played in 2 conference championship games each, and 1 has played in a SB.

However, they decide to put a new underachieving team back where an underachieving team left to go to Baltimore. The bottom line here is the only thing the Browns have done well for the last 35+ years is lose. Sure, they’ve had a few years where they were decent, but not since Otto Graham has the Browns even been relevant….

Even the latest expansion, the Houston Texans, have managed a better record over their expansion than the new Cleveland Browns….

I just personally think the Cleveland Browns team might have succeeded better had they gone to another city like Oklahoma City or San Antonio…

by DevilsReject on Oct 15, 2009 9:06 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Can you please copy and paste

exactly what you wrote here to the Brown’s blog response to Bruce? That would sure make my day.

Number 20, I mean, that guy is superman, for real. - Derrick Mason

by JenD on Oct 15, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I read the Browns blog...

and it seems that they have a point in how their expansion was treated differently than the previous expansion teams.

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 15, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Even Baltimore

made no sense because the city itself wouldn’t break down and do anything for the Colts, which was an established team with SB winning credentials… so why would the NFL consider Baltimore after they ran their own team out of town?

by DevilsReject on Oct 15, 2009 9:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Geez, talk about uniformed...

“ran their own team out of town.” HAH!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Oct 15, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you're so informed.

Then what are you doing with this thread? (besides trolling obv.)

You should know the person responsible for moving your team is dead. Indy fans have nothing to do with it.

Oohh I feel so bad Indy has an NFL franchise that’s the best in the world. Gee I feel sooo bad for the people of Baltimore back in ’84. booo freaking hoooo. Happy now? Go away.

by MarshallPlan on Oct 15, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Still whining 25 years later

Every year for 25 years, Colts fans have heard this complaint about Indianapolis “stealing” their team. I like the Ravens and enjoy watching them play. But year after year after year we hear the whining and complaining and accusing that we “stole” the Colts. We feel for Baltimore losing the Colts, however we get tired of hearing about it and getting accused. At some point you say, “Get over it already!” The way Irsay’s father moved the team was definitely shady, but if the city was threatening eminent domain and confiscating the team you owned from you, wouldn’t you sneak your team out in the middle of the night also?

Other cities have lost NFL teams also. And normally when they lose them, the city is often somewhat to blame because they will not step up to help the team out. Yet I rarely to never hear Baltimore admitting any fault in the Colts leaving.

Indianapolis almost lost the Colts the year they won the Super Bowl. We had the smallest stadium in the NFL and many tax payers didn’t want to increase taxes to build a new stadium. But the city and state stepped up to keep the Colts and to keep them from moving to LA. We stepped up where Baltimore didn’t. Minnesota has also come very close to losing their team.

And yet what most gets to me as a Colts fan is that Baltimore fans will say that Indianapolis stole the Colts, but that they didn’t steal the Browns. If that isn’t hypocritical, I don’t know what is. Baltimore took the Brown team from Cleveland plain and simple.

If Baltimore was going to legitimately complain about the Colts leaving for 25 years, you’d have thought that they would have at least attended the games. Baltimore had very poor attendance at the Colts games. For years Indy fans consistently supported our team through bad seasons.

I hope Baltimore fans get whined to by the Cleveland fans for 25 years or more like us Indy fans have endured from Baltimore fans. After 25 years, you get tired of hearing about it. Move on!

by ColtsFanInEnemyTerritory on Oct 15, 2009 11:55 AM EDT reply actions  

I am glad ESPN did the documentary (this probably will not be read)

I am thankful that this documentary was filmed. I was too young to know what was happening back then. I think I was eight years old. I have seen a few references here and there, but nothing in-depth. It was neat to see why things happened the way they did.

I was raised watching the Chicago Bears. I did not get into watching the Colts until after I left home. I came into football consciousness around the time of the ’85 Bears. My football heroes were Mike Singletary and Walter Payton.

I give respect to the devotion that the Baltimore Colt’s Band showed. To me, and according to the film, they were the tipping point to get their town a new Team.

by littlejohnny on Oct 15, 2009 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I keep hearing that Baltimore is over what happened....haha if you really believe that then watch the video of this SCHMUCK

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXTZVj9nNek

The way our defense is set up, it puts me in situations where I'm one-on-one in making tackles on running backs. When I go into it, I think I am going to win. It really doesn't matter the size, height, weight, whatever. I'm not afraid of putting my body in there." - Bob Sanders

by coltsfan723 on Oct 15, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions  

haha

The way our defense is set up, it puts me in situations where I'm one-on-one in making tackles on running backs. When I go into it, I think I am going to win. It really doesn't matter the size, height, weight, whatever. I'm not afraid of putting my body in there." - Bob Sanders

by coltsfan723 on Oct 15, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im no hoosier

I wasn’t born when the Colts moved away from Baltimore, and became a fan long after 1984. But the one thing that really erks me is how the city of Baltimore still has angst towards indianapolis, the players. the organization, and the current owner Jim Irsay. If the old Baltimore players like Raymond Berry can be forgiving by actually attending Colts games and being on the sidelines with the players, than so too can the city of Baltimore. Jim Irsay is no where near the douche his father was and what city would say no to a football team? Your anger should be directed at Robert Irsay only. Not Indy, not his son Jim, and certainly not the players like the Ravens fans did when the Colts came back in that playoff game in 2006.

by metal_militia on Oct 15, 2009 1:13 PM EDT reply actions  

and I still dont even think fans should solely blame Bob

The city played a role in the Colts leaving Baltimore other that that….

+1

The way our defense is set up, it puts me in situations where I'm one-on-one in making tackles on running backs. When I go into it, I think I am going to win. It really doesn't matter the size, height, weight, whatever. I'm not afraid of putting my body in there." - Bob Sanders

by coltsfan723 on Oct 15, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is Baltimore's fault

They brought this upon themselves. They lost the Colts. We got the Colts. The same thing with Cleveland. Quit crying about this for God’s sake. It’s over. The Colts play in Lucas Oil Stadium in downtown Indianapolis and the Ravens play at MT&T Bank Stadium or whatever it is called in Baltimore. It’s the Indianapolis Colts. No one cares where they came from.

I don’t care about the Baltimore Colts at all. I don’t want the history from them. I only care about 1984-2009.

"Brett Favre was a man who thought he was retired, but he knew it wouldn't last."

by Colts Homer on Oct 15, 2009 5:10 PM EDT reply actions  

I disagree with you Colts Homer

I believe that Indianapolis wanted the Colts name and history really bad. 1958 and
1959 World Championships and 1971 Super Bowl were a backbone for the new team
and gave the city something to build on.

by Indysawinner on Oct 15, 2009 5:24 PM EDT reply actions  

do you blame them? I dont!

Granted I am from Indy- and I love the Colts! Let me put a different “spin” on the story. Think of it as a person working for a company. This person see’s that there are basic needs being needed to make the workplace a better and safer place for everyone- this person address’s the concerns with the higher ups- they say no- we cant do it- so the person says they will find another job elsewhere that will meet tmeet the need-the person says- I will leave if they arent met- well the higher ups again said no- just try it- mean time- the person said for sake of job security for now that he was NOT looking for other work- and finds a potential employment in a company that would do anything to have him work there- well the person hears that the present employer is going to find legal means to keep him there- so he quits- with the full if any 2 weeks notice to a place that would treat him with dignity and respect! Do you blame the person? I think not!
Everything I gather is that the city people who were responsible for the team and the stadium constantly refused to help the team- when you look at pictures of the stadium they had weeds growing in the stands- when the team played there- the facilities were horrendius- is it too much for the team to ask to fix it- to make it usable- and to much for the team to say we need fans to show up? Attendance was terrible- the stadium was looking as bad as the Coliseum in Italy- and then the city wanted iminent domain- come now- I dont blame them for leaving, day or night- for a place which would show them respect and diginity! Granted- I would be upset if it happened to me that I lost the team I rooted for- well balem your city for delapidated faciclities and blame the fans for supporting the team and showing up- you “love” something but dont want to be apart of it- sounds like grounds for divorce to me!

by Jb4ever1207 on Oct 16, 2009 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

This posting comes across as baiting to me. I mean, what kind of responses are you expecting from a Colts blog? “Oh gee Baltimore, sorry the dead father of our current owner stole a team you guys weren’t properly supporting. Here, you can have the Colts history from 1953-1983.”

The honest truth is that this rivalry is one-sided. The Ravens aren’t a divisional rival. They aren’t a conference rival. There’s nothing about the Ravens that makes for a rivalry, other than this nonsense that you guys drag up every now and then.

Seriously, let it die. Five years from now, the Colts will have been in Indianapolis longer than they were in Baltimore. Old wounds stay open because people pick at the scabs and won’t let them heal.

Bob Sanders eats a forest on Friday so he can lay the wood on Sunday.
http://monkeybiziu.deviantart.com

by MonkeyBusiness on Oct 19, 2009 12:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Stats Prove It: Brady Is Now a Choker

Recent FanPosts

Small
Coaching staff finalized today...
Small
How to build a championship team
Small
Two more colts assistants
Small
Co-existence
Img_0497-comp_small
Colts Mock Draft
Small
Tony Ugoh
Small
Jim Irsay on Peyton Manning Last Week
Small
next years' starting lineup
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Small
Colts Mock 1.0

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Photo_small nopuntintended

Colts_small emiller17

Sbmanning_small Stew Blake