Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Bob Sanders had a helmet at practice, and other AMAZING news stories

Last night, prior to the "Favregeddon" Monday Night Football Game (which featured Aaron Rodgers commit two game-killing turnovers and 40-year-old Brett Favre have a career night throwing the ball), Indy Star's PhilB provided his readers this little nugget from yesterday's practice (Tip to Cassieper and LovinBlue):

Oh, and I should add this important note: S BOB SANDERS HAD A HELMET TODAY FOR PRACTICE!

Omfg-argh_medium

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG!

It's, like, serious-I'm-going-to-lose-my-sh*t-in-my-pants-in-front-of-your-mom time! The Bobzilla. The Zombie. The Eater of Souls. The BSBD. The Hawkeye from Hell. Chuck Norris' Chuck Norris. He actually attended a practice for the first time in 2009 with... a... (go ahead big guy, just say it)... HELMET!

O-face_medium

Now, in all seriousness, it is nice to see that Bob is now able to carry heavy equipment to the practice field, and while I love Bob Sanders and all he has done for the Colts, the fact of the matter is, right now, the Colts do not need him.

I don't write this to suggest that I want Bob Sanders traded, released, or exorcised by a Catholic priest back to the demon pit from whence he came. I'm just saying that, right now, the Colts are playing defense at a very high level. They are the #5 scoring defense in football (15.5 points per game), the #5 pass defense, and the #15 ranked rushing defense having held their last two opponents under 50 yards rushing.

I'm also saying that Melvin Bullitt is playing outstanding football, and his efforts should not be rewarded with a seat on the bech while an injury prone safety returns from yet another knee operation.

More than anything else, I'm saying I am sick and tired of "The Bob Sanders Watch."

Star-divide

340x_medium

A familiar site: Bob Sanders (left) sans pads during practice

 

Today, he had a helmet. Tomorrow, he'll be in pads. On Thursday, he'll run a little bit. On Friday, maybe he'll do a walk through. And then, on Sunday night, maybe he'll play and maybe he won't.

At this point, I really don't care if he does or not.

I played this game all last year and I played it most of 2006. Bob Sanders is a special player, and by all accounts he is a great guy. But we Colts ticket buyers do not pay him $37.5 million just to play in, maybe, ten games out of sixteen. I know Bill Polian said something a few weeks ago about how it was OK for Bob to play twelve out of sixteen games a year.

Um, no Bill. It isn't.

I love Bob. I very much appreciate his contributions. But, for us fans, we just saw Dwight Freeney sustain a rather serious quad injury against the Cardinals two games ago. Many experts thought he'd miss several weeks. Turns out, those experts under-estimated Dwight Freeney. He did not miss this past Sunday's game, and his presence made an immediate impact. And while I understand that a strained quad is very different from the many "knee scopes" Bob has gone through, there is no doubting the perception that Dwight Freeney is "tougher" than Bob Sanders, and he does not allow injury to cost him games.

With Bob, the fact of the matter is he cannot stay healthy, and, from a fan's point of view, such players are not worth the time of day. Sorry NFL players, but that's the price you pay for your multi-milion dollar contracts. Fans have zero loyalty or sympathy for a $37 million dollar player who cannot consistantly stay on the field. In Bob's case, he does not play smart and he does not do enough to keep himself from sustaining these time consuming injuries, most of which having to do with his knees and legs. He doesn't seem to do enough to keep them and the rest of his lower body strong.

Add into the mix the before-mentioned Melvin Bullitt.

Since Bob Sanders missed most of last season with (brace yourself) knee problems, Melvin Bullitt has been the starting strong safety for the Colts for two seasons. And while Bullitt does not provide the same big play ability that Bob does, what Bullitt does provide is consistency and outstanding production. You know that Bullitt will be there because, unlike Bob, Bullitt can stay healthy.

340x_medium

Melvin Bullitt

 

And since this new coaching staff is all about accounability and playing the players who are playing the best right now, what kind of signal does it send to the players if the coaches bench Bullitt (a two year starter) for Bob Sanders (a player who has not earned his starting job)?

So, while I'm sure many want to throw a parade because Bob Sanders showed up to practice with his friggin' helmet, the fact is I really don't care. Bob should have been placed on the PUP to start the season considering it is now Week Five and he has participated in ZERO practices since January. No mini-camps. No OTAs. No training camp. No pre-season. No games.

Nothing.

So, for four weeks now, Bob Sanders has been taking up a roster spot for really no reason whatsoever. Want a reason why the Colts were not able to keep DT Adrian Grady? Look now further than Bob Sanders.

Even if Bob does practice this week, what about him says he should get time at strong safety over Melvin Bullitt, who has been sweeting it out since the very beginning?

If Bob is healthy to play, great! Put him out there on special teams (he'd be a scary gunner). Maybe have him in on some dime or nickel packages, or rotate him in on short yardage plays. But, for me, the starting safety from here on out is Melvin Bullitt. He's earned it for 2009. Bob hasn't. If Bob wants his old job back, the first thing he needs to prove is that he can stay healthy for a full 16 game season. Until he does that, it is Melvin's job to lose.

Comment 152 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

yeah...um

Bob will start if he’s healthy.

@lefpsyd

by lefpsyd on Oct 6, 2009 10:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, um

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Oct 6, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whew..........

BBS, so how do you really feel? I don’t disagree at all. But you know if he comes back and blows the opponents up, all this becomes moot. I betcha when Sanders comes back, they find a way to get Bullitt in the lineup, Or he and Sanders platoon some. In any event I doubt seriously that Sanders becomes injury free, and Bullitt will get back on the field anyway.

by tim55 on Oct 6, 2009 11:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

My point is Bullitt should be the primary and starting SS while Bob comes in on situational plays. Bascially, Bullitt takes Bob’s old job and Bob takes Bullitt’s old job.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Oct 6, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yup

I can go along with that………I suspect that Sanders will be moved in slowly just from a prudence and “football shape” standpoint. In a perfect world, Sanders should have to earn his position back. Just out of curiosity, how many games has Bullitt started as opposed to Sanders since Bullitt’s acquisition?

by tim55 on Oct 6, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Makes a lot of sense to me

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Oct 6, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree

Bob should be worked into the lineup and not just thrown in. He will be rusty for sure and Bullitt has shown that he can be counted on.

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed Tim

I’m all for Bob coming back, and if he can come back healthy, and I mean completely 100% healthy, then fantastic. BBS, how about some objective reporting though? this article is reminiscent of the Tony Ugoh benching article…..

by harbaughmyhero on Oct 6, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I love seeing 21 out there but Bullitt has earned the start. They need to phase Bob back in like they are doing with Marlin.

Hope to see Bob get some PT this weekend (really wanna see him get a shot at Collins or Chris Johnson) or atleast by the Rams game, but more importantly we need 26 & 58 healthy.

by jadurr03 on Oct 6, 2009 11:01 AM EDT reply actions  

This is rarely the case, but I agree 100% with you BBS

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Oct 6, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions  

You aren't serious

I’m sorry, but I have to believe you wrote this just to stir some controversy. You just wrote an article like 2 days ago stating how dumb you were for questioning the coaches’ decision to start C.J. over Ugoh. Now you are arguing that Bullitt “deserves” that spot over a recent defensive player of the year? The best players play. Period. There is no deserve in the NFL. People don’t deserve to lose their jobs to injury, but it happens all the time these days when a player steps in for an injured player and plays better.

I understand that Bob’s inability to stay healthy may eventually cause the Colts to go with Bullitt over Bob, but as long as Bob is on this team and can play, he will and he should.

How soon we forget. Don’t bust on Bob because he’s injured. It’s obviously not from a lack of taking care of himself. He’s the size of Spud Webb and plays like Ray Lewis. How can you say we don’t need him? We are four freakin games into the season, and last I checked, we really haven’t been tested. Not to mention, the last good running team the Colts faced left tire tracks all over our players backs.

I understand your frustrations, but your conclusions are whacko.

The Shogun of Harlem

by shonuff on Oct 6, 2009 11:14 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I'm psyched to see Bob is on his way, however on your comment...
The best players play. Period.

As of now, Bob hasn’t played a down and you can’t call him “the best.” He may have been the best last year or 2 years ago, but not today. That would have been like calling Freeney the best DE while he sat on the sidelines two years ago – how would we know? I want to see Bobzilla out there as much as anyone, but to just thrust him out there because he was once defensive player of the year is imprudent given his propensity for injury and the fact that he hasn’t had game-time experience in months.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Oct 6, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Sure

So, if Peyton ever goes down with an injury and is out for a year, we can’t call him the best man for the job? I guess we would probably stick with Sorgi until Peyton could prove he deserved his starting spot back?

The Shogun of Harlem

by shonuff on Oct 6, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually I would say yes to that

Though I would predict a very fast transition.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Oct 6, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well then

I give you points for consistency.

The Shogun of Harlem

by shonuff on Oct 6, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol - yeah!

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Oct 6, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t you think the gap between Peyton Manning and Jim Sorgi/Painter is a lot larger than the gap between Bob Sanders and Melvin Bullitt?

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

thank you

my sentiments exactly shonuff

by harbaughmyhero on Oct 6, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

It kind of kills the jabs but Phil B clarified the quoted statement
That’s the expression we use to say a player is practicing. Sometimes, guys will be out there, but if they don’t have a helmet, they’re just watching. My colleague said Sanders was out there for practice. It would appear the hunch that Tennessee week was his target for returning is accurate. We’ll see how much he practices later in the week, and more importantly, how his knee handles it.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah.

BBS apparently didn’t read 2 lines down in LovinBlue’s FanPost, evidenced by BBS not knowing the Bobzilla actually practiced. I was just about to quote that exactly and then include this picture:

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Oct 6, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm gonna go ahead

and entirely disagree. You lay out an honest, intelligent opinion about your position regarding this news, and without taking any cheap shots, but Bob Sanders is the starting safety. Does that mean that Bullitt should get a pat on the back, a “thanks for the effort, kid,” and get benched. Absolutely not. He should continue to see extensive playing time, as he has earned it.

That being said, with Bob being out, it seems you forget how valuable he truly is when healthy. Melvin Bullitt is a very good player, and he has done very well in Bob’s absence, but he has not “outplayed” Bob. Bob was the defensive MVP two years ago, and when healthy, is still at that level. Bullitt is not. He has been very good, but not “best safety in the NFL” good. A lot of Bullitt’s success also stems from the improvement of the defense as a whole. A few year’s back, Bob and Freeney were the only chance our defense had of containing offenses. Bullitt does not have that kind of an impact (yet).

As for the toughness bit, it seems you lead on that because Freeney recovers faster than Bob, he is tougher (I really doubt you are not seriously questioning Bob’s toughness, so I may have misread that, and if I did, disregard). That is not a fair comparison at all. They are both extremely tough (about the same), two of the toughest guys in the league. Bob’s toughness is due to the way he throws his body at people no matter the cost. He has no fear of contact with players of any size. That is why he gets hurt, because he plays THAT hard. And don’t forget, he is not a large man. Freeney is of course as tough as Bob, but is also much bigger, which may factor in his quicker recovery rate. And yes, recovering from surgery and recovering from a muscle strain are NOT the same. At all.

As for the Grady mention, I loved that guy as much as anybody and was sad to see him go, but if you are seriously saying that we should have kept him instead of Bob, you are out of your freaking mind. To keep Grady, we should have cut a guy like Simpson or another player. Not a former D MVP. Just because he had the gall to surgically repair an injured knee.

Now as for Bullitt, if he should start the game when Bob returns, I will be 100% okay with that, but Bob should see as much, if not more, PT than Bullitt, because it is Bob’s position that Bullitt was filling in for. He did not steal it from Bob, and hasn’t performed well enough to do so (not a shot at Melvin b/c few could). You say Bob hasn’t “earned it.” Yes, he absolutely has. He has earned it with each year of significant impact he has given us, even if it meant risking his health. He earned it by being the best safety in football. The position is Bob’s to lose and I don’t anticipate him letting someone have it. If he does come out and underperforms, and it seems he has lost his edge, then by all means, we are still in great shape with a great player in Bullitt, who should start. But until Bob proves he CAN’T do it, it is still his job.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 11:26 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Short version

for those who don’t want to read my short story (I have a bad habit of extended rants), the last sentence is basically my main point. Bob shouldn’t be pushed aside, yet. If he can show he is still the player we all know him to be, it’s his job. What I should have mentioned is that he also has to stay healthy this time, or else I echo many here (including BBS) that Bullitt should start because it will prove he can stay healthy and play at a high level vs. Bob, who can play at an elite level, but not for a whole season. Both should at least platoon, regardless of the circumstances.

The injury dilemma I am intrigued by is how PT at WR will be distributed when Gonzo gets back. Garcon has played great thus far. Should be interesting.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Editing the third sentence above

I hate the way that sounds. I am saying if he can’t stay healthy again, then I would understand if the team chose to not re-sign him or trade him. If he is healthy, he is still a top 3-5 safety, and you can’t keep a guy like that on the bench when healthy. And I should have been more specific with the last sentence of the first chunk in saying that I would be okay with a platoon, not that they “should.”

Yeah…I’m gonna go ahead and quit replying to myself now.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Part of the argument BBS is making (me thinks) is that Bob shouldn’t just be thrown onto the field so he can hurry up and get injured again. We all want Sanders healthy, most importantly, and easing him back into the lineup is the best way to give him those valuable reps without being too hard on his seemingly frail body. I can’t believe I just typed that but it’s true, he can’t stay healthy and it is a problem.

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have no problem with that

But he seems (at least this is how I am interpreting it) that he thinks that Melvin Bullitt has passed up Bob Sanders and should be the starter, whether Bob is healthy or not. In short, he is implying that Bullitt is either better than Sanders or that even though Bob is better, Bullitt should start because he can stay healthy. Neither of those opinions is correct. Bob is still a top 3-5 safety when healthy, and Bullitt hasn’t done anything to threaten his (Bob) role with the team. Bullitt is NOT better than Sanders just because he hasn’t had any injuries.

Now, on the other hand, I agree he should be eased back in rather than just be thrown into Coyer’s defensive scheme. I also would understand that if he once again cannot stay healthy, the team may consider trading him. I’d hate it, but would understand, as he gets paid quite a bit to not be on the field. Yet in the past, Sanders and Freeney were our only big play threats on defense and much was expected of both, and each delivered (and still are). As a result of his devotion to making big plays on physically bigger guys, Bob got hurt more often, unfortunately. Now, we are much more dangerous on D and Sanders will not be expected to carry the entire defense along with Freeney. Therefore, this year is his best chance to stay healthy as he has a better system with better players than he ever has.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok so question

with bobzilla back…do you not think he can help make the run defense better? I mean the Titans are gonna try to run and I would love nothing more than to see bobzilla knock chris johnson on his seat.

by coltsfan723 on Oct 6, 2009 11:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Not throwing Bob straight into a full time spot is smart for everyone

but just as coach speaky as “preaching accountability” is “you don’t lose a job to injury”

Bob has shown himself to be the best safety on the team and among the top handful in the league with his play over the last 4 years. He’s come back from injury to being as good or even better every time. There is no reason to doubt that we’ll see the Bob Sanders that has been playing on a DPOY level since the 2006 defensive turnaround.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 11:33 AM EDT reply actions  

shouldn't lose a job to AN injury

.. BUT if you can’t stay healthy, sooner or later the team has to look at a simple question of whether you are worth the money and roster spot.

Yes Bob is one of the best, but if he can’t stay healthy, then how much use is he? And how much cap space does he suck up?

No, you shouldn’t lose your job because of ONE injury, but when you can’t stay on the field, people are going to start asking the question. Bob now has a long history of injury, and this usually only get worse as you play more. And yes, the way he plays is why he is injured so much.

An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...

by bluegirl on Oct 6, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

so because he doesn't stay healthy they shouldn't use him when he is?

Bob’s injury situation should effect him in the GM’s office, but on the field all that should matter is that he’s the best safety on the team.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

this is going be hard, and I'm sure I'll be called names over it...

But how do you know that Sanders is the best safety on the roster? What proof do we have? He’s definitely the hardest hitting safety on the roster, but do you have any sort of statistical evidence that shows that the defense is any better when he’s on the field?

I think going into last year everyone would have said, "marvin harrison is a better wr than anthony gonzalez’, but that wasn’t necessarily the truth at the time.

Bob Sanders has become something more than ‘Bob Sanders’, some mythical being that, just from the mere mention of his name, greatness will appear.

1) In what areas do you think Melvin Bullitt lacks that Bob Sanders is clearly going to improve?

2) If you believe that Sanders is better at run defense, do you believe he is so much better that it will make a diffence with the new defensive scheme/front 7?

3) Do you believe Bullitt is better worse than Sanders in pass coverage?

I guess what it comes down to for me is: What has Bullitt done to lose the job? No, I don’t believe in losing a spot to injury, but this isnt AN INJURY, this is years and years and years of being injured. As I’ve said, staying healthy is a skill, one that Bob Sanders lacks in heaps. Well, he’s the greatest safety ever, but his body can’t take it. Well, then he’s not the greatest safety ever. My opinion, ultimately, means dick, but Bob has done nothing to earn the starting job and Melvin Bullitt has done nothing to lose it.

As an aside, I think a lot of people had an issue with Brett Favre skipping camps, otas, etc… and then being handed a job over people that worked their tail off. While the situations are slightly different (Bob is injured, but he is making a habit out of missing training camp) the biggest difference, in my mind is: Brett Favre >>> Tavaris Jackson/Sage Rosenfels, I don’t think Bob Sanders is that much better than MB.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I still insist that Sage would have been made to look pretty goddamn good by that Vikings team too, but that’s neither here nor there.

You’re right with your logic, but if and when Bob starts taking snaps/starts from Melvin, it’ll be because he has demonstrated that he’s better.

Bullitt is one of my favorite guys on the team and he has exceeded all our expectations, but he’s a step behind Bob in most areas if Bob regains form. Bullitt is a good run defender, has good closing speed, hits hard, and can do the job when playing deep zones down the field. Bob is a better run defender, has better closing speed, hits harder, and does a bit better when playing deep zones down the field.

I fully expect them to ease Bob back in and to find ways for Bullitt to still see action. I’m not sure how realistic it would ever be to have them both on the field at once, but maybe there are situations where it’d be useful. We’ll see. For now though, I’m not worried that they’re going to just toss him out there and hope for the best. If he gets to play, he’ll play well.

by willyduer on Oct 6, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

$$$

That is the key. When he comes back, let’s hope he can stay healthy. If he can’t, then when speaking financially, it makes more sense to keep Bullitt, a high level safety who stays healthy, but also is much more affordable cap wise. Bob is getting paid to much to be on the sidelines. But I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt one more time in hopes that he can finally stay healthy.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

It wouldn't make a lot of sense to cut Bob capwise.

I have heard that Bob would practically cost the same whether or not he is on the roster. Could someone with more knowledge on the cap back me up with some numbers?

by jocre on Oct 6, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't mean CUT him

That would be ludicrous. I don’t care how often he gets hurt, you don’t simply cut a guy like that. I just meant when his contract was up, if we decided not to resign him or trade him before it is up. I know his contract won’t be up for a while (I think), but I was just speculating. But you’re right, cutting him makes no sense, financially or strategically. Sorry made it sound otherwise.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I don’t think Bob should be thrown in the fire right away (probably should have been clearer on that in my above posts). He should be eased back in to the starting role, frankly, because we can afford it with Bullitt back there doing a great job. Once Bob gets comfortable again and starts devouring people, then give him the majority of PT. If he comes back a different player and seems to have lost a few steps, then it should be interesting what happens. I doubt Bob will lose any steps, though, when he knows Bullitt is breathing down his neck for his job.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good idea

I agree that Bob should be eased back into the lineup and not thrown into the fire. I, however, think Bob will be a little rusty when he comes back so I am very comfortable with Bullitt getting the large majority of playing time the first couple games or so.

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also...

I beleive that since this defense is better, bob will not only get better, but will not be injured as much. I mean like stated by npb

A few year’s back, Bob and Freeney were the only chance our defense had of containing offenses.
Now that bob and dwight have a great defense behinde them, it takes some load off of them.

by coltsfan723 on Oct 6, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions  

actually all npb said was...

A few year’s back, Bob and Freeney were the only chance our defense had of containing offenses.

the rest was me lol

by coltsfan723 on Oct 6, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

With better DT's

hopefully the RBs won’t be running with a full head of steam when they reach bobs level.. if the DTs are able to slow the RB down then the collision will be less punishing.. wishful thinking i know

by ColtfaninPitts on Oct 6, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't be so amature BBS

Melvin is fantastic at his job and could start anywhere. I don’t disagree with you there. Bob is better, and is a game changer. INTs, FFs, he creams RBs in the backfield, I mean he was D MVP for an offensive team! How fickle we humans can be and how soon we forget. We’ll see how soon he is ready and I’m sure Caldwell will do the right thing, I trust whatever decision he makes (bc Tony and Bill and Jim do, and I have no reason not to).

Melvin will still see a good amount of PT, maybe some Quarter situations depending upon who is healthy at CB, I certainly trust him there. He will play when we are leading by a good amount in the 4th.

OK this is random and maybe a bad idea but it may have been nice to have 3 great safeties for Miami and really put 1 or 2 in at run D, possibly man D on RBs, during the wildcat.

Lucas Berridge

by Firebird on Oct 6, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Good Place to Be

I’m as big of a fan of Bullitt as the next guy (I’m from Texas and he attended A&M). I mean the dude saved some games for us last year with some game ending interceptions. Up to this point he has been lights out and our safety core is great. However, I think BoB Sanders will still be the starting safety and will bring some much needed help to our run defense. I don’t know about you guys but I am tired of seeing running backs tee off on us. We dodged a huge bullet in the Miami game and looking at our schedule we still have the likes of Frank Gore and Chris Johnson to deal with. Not to mention that elusive running back from Houston that I hate. Simply put, Bob Sanders makes offences re-think their game plan…..

~Bowl or Bust~

by rascolts on Oct 6, 2009 11:49 AM EDT reply actions  

i learned my lesson

with the Tony Ugoh/Charlie Johnson debate. Whoever the team goes with, i think will be the best decision and will give them the best chance to win the game.

Doesnt matter to me who it is, but i want to see them out there kicking some a**.

by MARVININDY on Oct 6, 2009 11:51 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't think anyone disagrees with that

It’s a win-win as far as I’m concerned, but is still an interesting discussion topic. With both guys in there, it will be a HUGE improvement to an already stout defense. I still say Bob is at a higher level than Bullitt, but he is at a higher level than most safeties (when healthy). We are kind of a good team.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

We'll have to see how it plays out.

it will be interesting to see how they approach it, you are right about that. You would assume the team would be at a point where keeping Sanders healthy needs to be addressed. At some point they will have to start thinking long term about his injuries and whether or not its smart to keep dealing with it…..if they havent already. That being said, i wouldnt be suprised to see him playing part time until he’s back to 100%

I guess the more I think about it, i do miss seeing those hits that knock people out of their shoes =)~~

If #21 is the better option they will go with it. The Colts havent gotten where they are without making smart decisions when it comes to stuff like this.

by MARVININDY on Oct 6, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Colts decision

is the one I will support. Caldwell and co. know better than anyone here. I just love seeing Bob knock the snot out of people and he is VERY good at doing it.

by npb1985 on Oct 6, 2009 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

How does he prove he's healthy for 16 games

…if Melvin Bullit is playing?

Melvin is a good player. I’ll be happy to have him starting next season when we’re forced to release Bethea because of salary, but you’re delusional if you think he’s a superior player to Sanders simply because he can stay on the field.

by MileHighHoosier on Oct 6, 2009 12:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Paycheck

Bullitt needs to be getting some of Breakable Bob’s paycheck for doing his job for more than a year now. And MileHighHoosier, at this point in time, Melvin IS a superior player because he CAN stay on the field.

by All4Indiana on Oct 6, 2009 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

maybe come contract time

but with both players standing in front of Caldwell/Coyer healthy Bob is clearly the better safety to use at that time.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I dont understand the logic here

Of starting Bullitt over Sanders because he has stayed healthy and played well in his absence. If Sanders is healthy now, why the hell would you sit him? Especially after the bye week. By then there’s no reason whatsoever for Bullitt to start.
Some have even said, well what if he gets hurt again? Well that will suck and im sure the Colts will deal with him in the offseason. But why would you sit an elite player out of spite? If you really want this defense to excel you dont sit the former Defensive Player of the Year when hes healthy. I would rather the Colts trade him to geniuses like the Raiders than sit him out. That is just a pure waste of talent. Because of his history, maybe he wont be worth the big paycheck when his contract runs out, but for now im in favor of the better man playing

by ColtsPurdueFanFromKY on Oct 6, 2009 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Sanders will see time

Similar to the way we see Jackson playing. Getting his feet under him, getting some reps, but with the other guys in the “starting” role.

Bullitt has been great, makes great tackles and lays some wood of his own. Bob is great, we love Bob and want him back, but I don’t see him being thrown right back into the starting job.

by slash196 on Oct 6, 2009 12:21 PM EDT reply actions  

I know this is totally off topic

But BBS, where did you find that screenshot from Commando? That face is f****** priceless!

by BlueMagic on Oct 6, 2009 12:23 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Google

I love that movie. Bennett is hilarious. And the woodshed scene… priceless.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Oct 6, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I loved Commando too.

All the elements of a great movie. Cheesy plot, great one-liners, and gratuitous violence. Everything a growing boy needs.

by BlueMagic on Oct 6, 2009 12:33 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

+1

i had a crush on Raydawn Chong as a kid because of that movie. =)~~

by MARVININDY on Oct 6, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

When healthy, Sanders > Bullitt

Bullitt is definitely a valuable asset for the Colts considering Sander’s history of injury, but that’s not what you’re saying. You’re saying because of Sander’s history of injury, he should be benched, which is ridiculous.

I’m not opposed to playing Bullitt to spell Sanders at some point during the game, therefore maximizing his value, much like the Colts did with Freeney on Sunday and are doing with Jackson. The idea that we shouldn’t even play him when he’s perfectly healthy because he’s been hurt in the past is idiotic.

by MileHighHoosier on Oct 6, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

All I gotta say...

Is I completely agree with BBS!!! First time ever I think!!! I have not even thought about Bob this season…Bullitt is the starter now.

"If me and King Kong went into an alley, only one of us would come out. And it wouldn't be the monkey."
"I don't really trust a sane person."
"I never met a man I didn't want to fight." The one and only Lyle Alzado

by TRDean on Oct 6, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

ummm no i dont think he is

he is bobs back up…has been for a while. hes just keepin the seat warm till bobzilla comes back. And come sunday, bob is gonna gonna go down to Tennessee and knock chris johnson to kingdom come.

by coltsfan723 on Oct 6, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting

I agree with most of this article. Especially given the quotes from the defensive players that they have recently gelled, it would seem counter-productive to add a new element (even if it is Bobzilla) immediately into the starting lineup and subtract an element that has proved very efficient. I expect Bob to play because that’s what’s been said from the beginning – “Bob’s coming back for the Tennessee game, otherwise why not PUP him?” But, like how they’ve used Marlin Jackson situationally for the most part, I expect Bullit to start and Bob to act as a reliever, perhaps even a defensive closer if needed.

Personally I don’t care who’s out there as long as they’re the best player on the field for what we need. Given Fisher’s trickery when it comes to the Colts, and Polian’s sense that we’ll see a decent amount of the Wildcat this Sunday, why wouldn’t you want your best run-stopping safety in the mix? The fact is, Bob makes the defense play with a higher level of intensity, and we’ll need it. So I want him and will be disappointed if he doesn’t play much.

As for the Freeney comparison, be careful. Yes, Bob has been injury-prone, and yes, D-Free did come back immediately from the quad injury. But don’t forget that Freeney also took himself out of the season after the lis-franc injury in 07 to have surgery. Everything I heard at the time was that he could play, but risked further injury. If he could play but chose to have surgery (which arguably cost us our season with no pass rush), then I don’t see any difference between him and Bob. Both are tough players, one just happens to be a human missle (something I think contributes greatly to Bob’s injury issues) and the other is a human tornado. They always play balls out, but they’re both smart enough to know when playing would further risk injury. Freeney this week knew that he could play after the Cards game. It’s very possible that the caution from the Colts front office, coupled with a hyper media, may have led us to believe that his injury was worse than it actually was. Sanders has played with smaller injuries as well, don’t forget.

I do wish, like you, that Bob would figure out a way to strengthen the lower part of his body to match the upper part, but until it happens we’ll just have to abide by a guy who has trouble staying healthy for a full season. Why must we abide? Because when he’s healthy, nobody’s better.

by EddieDean on Oct 6, 2009 12:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Melvin has played outstanding football, no question. However, you seem to have forgotten Bob’s return to our defense right before the start of the best playoff series ever. Remember? People were all but guaranteeing a first round playoff loss because our run defense was so pathetic. Then Bobzilla came back and played a critical role in transforming our D into the run-stopping machine we rode to a Super Bowl victory. And yes, I will always be loyal to Bob for doing that.

by FreeneyisaMonster on Oct 6, 2009 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Remember our other safety is an FA after this year

I’m in the camp of those who think it’s now Bullitt’s job, but that Bob gets it back quickly, if he’s healthy. Yes, looked at in the abstract Bob is a better player than Bullitt, but right now, on the field, that’s not the case. Even if Sanders is outright given or promptly re-earns the job, there’ll be plenty of work for Bullitt, especially if Coyer can come up with a way for the nickel-dime packages to include him—and not Jennings.

Bethea is one of my favorite Colts. But, the team has committed big money to one safety and may not be willing to do so for two, especially with Bullitt on the roster. My fear has been all along that the team can afford one of three out of Bethea, Jackson and Brackett. Because of Bullitt, I think they pay Brackett and let Bethea and Jackson go. Lacey’s and Power’s development all but assures Jackson’s gone, anyway.

The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in the stars, but in ourselves.

by Coltsfan58 on Oct 6, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions  

They would be

stupid to let Bethea go. He’s the only member of our secondary who has been in just about every game for us.

If Sanders cant stay healthy, cut him and use that money to sign Bethea and Bullitt to long term deals…

by DevilsReject on Oct 6, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the thing...

You cannot have a guy play most of the year at a high level of play, only to have some guy come back for a few games each year. That’s what Bob Sanders has been doing virtually every year of his career.

I love Sanders. He plays no holds barred and I wish more players played like him. However, it’s not fair to the guys who put in the time for 12-14 weeks of the year to bust their ass and get benched for him.

His 2007 season was his career year for just about everything, including games played.

Sanders is to our secondary what Freeney is to our D-Line….but if you can’t be on the field often enough, then its time to replace you. 3 years ago anyone would have called us nuts to think that we would cut Harrison from the team. Injuries and lack of being a threat removed him from being a legit WR for us. The same can and will happen to Bob.

I personally say we let him come back like Jackson is this year. Next year is a make or break year. If he can’t stay on the field, he needs to go….or be used in a rotation as many have already suggested….

by DevilsReject on Oct 6, 2009 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Bob Slander sucks.

Wait and see if the old Bob shows up again before you start calling for his ouster. What if he stays healthy this year and we win another Super Bowl?

And whether or not he starts is much less important than how he plays when he’s in the game. We should beat the Titans either way.

by shoein on Oct 6, 2009 1:17 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

I’ll bet Melvin Bullet would prefer to have Bob on the roster. Bob taught all those DBs how to play with his ferocious example. And nobody sniffs out the play and demolishes it like Bob does. The opponents are afraid of him because he’s ugly mean to them. He’s out there to hurt people and he doesn’t care if he disintegrates when he hits them.

I’ll take a healthy Bob for the last 8 regular season games every year if him sitting the first 8 makes him healthy. It’s the end of the season that matters.

by wcwills on Oct 6, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

bingo!

seems like shoein gets it! We cast Bob aside, when not so long ago we had nicknames for him like “The Eraser” and “Big Brother”, but now, since he’s been hurt….it’s so long and farewell don’t let the door hit you on the way out. Give me a break, this man transformed our defense and was a major part of a Super Bowl run.

I love Mel Bullitt, but Bob Sanders is Bob Sanders, feel free to say that out loud. he’s 5’8 206 and hits harder than Troy Polamolu ever dreams of. If he is totally healthy then there is no reason to keep him out. period, end of story.

by harbaughmyhero on Oct 6, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whether Bob starts or not is not the issue

The issue is, will Brady have switched from skirt to slacks before Bob clocks him?

by tim55 on Oct 6, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions  

THIS IS THE BEST POINT

Don’t we all want to see Bob come free on a blitz to hit Brady? I am dying to see this.

The Shogun of Harlem

by shonuff on Oct 6, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

AMEN

I might also mention that I would also like to see Bob blow up Welker on a crossing route and Bob demolish Moss anywhere on the field, including the sidelines. It would be worth the 15 yds., and, as we know, if Bob gets ejected the Colts lose little with Bullitt.

The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in the stars, but in ourselves.

by Coltsfan58 on Oct 6, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brady better switch from skirt to

midevil knights armour…I would love to see Sanders lay just one good one on that bitch of QB. haha that would just make my day

by coltsfan723 on Oct 6, 2009 1:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Completely agree with BBS.

First, staying healthy is a skill. Bob is not skilled at this.

Second, that $37MM would have looked great on some line help. If Bob Sanders was off the face of the planet, would anyone be at all worried about MB being the starting safety full time? I hope the answer is no.

Third, last year, with Bob coming in and out and in and out and out and in, it was clearly messing with MB’s preperation. On Weeks where he was definitely the starter, or on his 2nd week of starting, MB was great. On weeks where BS (good initials) would practice 2 days and then decide he needed a maitai on the beach, with no salt, MB was clearly worse (Houston game @ indy comes to mind).

Fourth, I’m pretty sure of this one, but not 100%, so I’m willing to be proven wrong. I don’t believe basic NFL stats show a difference in the defense with Sanders out/in, and I think FO did a DVOA test on defense with and without Sanders, and they said there was no major differences (someone will have to correct me, I know we have a few DVOA freeks on this board).

Fifth, I was entirely unimpressed with Bob last year. Especially the chargers game.

Sixth, I think he’s living on 2006. I think there was a time when Bob’s ability to was vital, but that time was when the Colts had Cato June, Rob Morris, Gilbert Gardner, and the Oompa Loompa’s at DT. This is a completely different defense than the last time Bob played. Hell, the last time Bob played, the economy was great, a bush was in the white house, the berlin wall was still standing, the migration to the west was beginning, the earth had just cooled, there was a big bang. Out of sight, out of mind. Give us our roster spot back!

Unrelated: some of you are mentioning Marlin Jackson walking, which I believe is the most likely course of action. However, and maybe someone could give a more informed answer, but I think that if next year is uncapped, Marlin Jackson loses his UFA status. This is only his 4th or 5th year, and under the uncapped system you need 6 years, so I think that means if there’s an uncapped year, Marlin is stuck with us.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

+1 about the Chargers game

that is what I am afraid of….putting Bob into the lineup and expecting him to be 100% when he will likely be rusty. He was injured almost all of last year and everyone expected him to be back to his old self for the Chargers game but he was a non-factor.

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

if's and but's don't compose a good argument

how about “when” bob is back on the field we’ll see “how” he does?

by harbaughmyhero on Oct 6, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just to pile on,

I’d like to repeat the fact (1st mentioned by Shake) that BBS’s entire hack of an article here is based on false information. Remember what BBS said:

Now, in all seriousness, it is nice to see that Bob is now able to carry heavy equipment to the practice field
Today, he had a helmet. Tomorrow, he’ll be in pads. On Thursday, he’ll run a little bit. On Friday, maybe he’ll do a walk through. And then, on Sunday night, maybe he’ll play and maybe he won’t.
So, while I’m sure many want to throw a parade because Bob Sanders showed up to practice with his friggin’ helmet, the fact is I really don’t care.
considering it is now Week Five and he has participated in ZERO practices since January.
Even if Bob does practice this week

Every one of those lines suggests that you didn’t know that Bobzilla actually practiced yesterday. Quickly, what Phil B said (and was included in LovinBlue’s FanPost that you linked too):

That’s the expression we use to say a player is practicing. Sometimes, guys will be out there, but if they don’t have a helmet, they’re just watching. My colleague said Sanders was out there for practice. It would appear the hunch that Tennessee week was his target for returning is accurate. We’ll see how much he practices later in the week, and more importantly, how his knee handles it.

Your entire article/argument is built upon a false premise. And what is it that Shake says happens when you build an argument upon a false premise? Oh yeah:

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Yes, his entire article was based on that quote

It wasn’t based on years of injury, years of missing practice, years of missing games, years of being inconsistent, years of missing out on mini-camps and training camps. His whole entire article was based on him not thinking Bob practiced on Monday. Congratulations, you figured it out, inch high private eye.

Btw, for someone that likes to tell us of their amazing wit you sure missed out on the heavy dose of sarcasm and tongue-in-cheekness from BBS in those quotes.

But thanks for making the same post that Shake made just so you could pull attention back on to yourself. Heaven forbid this thread was about Bob Sanders and not you.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

seriously man

I think you are right about the misinterpretation not being key to the article, but you need to drop the personal vendetta on Cass. Someone can be wrong without being a stupid attention whore. See me not calling BBS that even though I disagree with him on this.

Attack arguments not people.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know people can be wrong without being stupid attention whores, which is why i didn’t have an issue with the people in this thread that werent being stupid attention whores. If someone thinks Bob Sanders is still the bees knees, thats fine. There are a lot of people that like Bob Sander’s out there. Go Bob. Whatever makes the Colts the best possible team, in the end, is what we all want..

Cass, is, however, a stupid attention whore. And did, actually, personally attack BBS (not that I care, I’m sure he can handle himself), and I only pointed this out after he took the time to make the same post you did (which i didnt take issue with) not in reply form, just to say HAHA LOOK AT ME, HERE I AM.

Someone post that pic of the chick doing a handstand on the beach in her bikini…

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

"hack of an article based on false information"

isn’t the clearest wording ever, but it reads like an attack on the argument to me.

and I do think Cass added something of value by pulling all the quotes. I hadn’t picked up on that many that read like BBS didn’t know Sanders practiced.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you.

I was just in the middle of a comment saying basically the same thing, but you said it much more succinctly than me.

It becomes more clear after reading all the quotes that not all of those are tongue-in-cheek. I willing to bet that BBS thought that Bob didn’t practice yesterday.

By the way, SpazMo is the only one doing ad hominem attacks: “Cass, is, however, a stupid attention whore.”

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

its not an attack if its true.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes it is.

Whether or not you think it’s true, it’s still an ad hominem attack.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

say ad hominem again, it makes you feel special

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

but the next time you say it, you should probably try using it correctly.

I’m not saying shakes point was bad when he made it. I’m not saying shakes point is bad because you copied it. I’m not saying, ‘well, shake had a point, but Cass is [whatever], so you can’t really trust shake.’ If anything, you being involved has no bearing on shakes original point, because, as i said, YOU are not bringing anything to this discussion other than

1) quoting shake quoting phil b.

2) quoting BBS quoting BBS

3) pictures

There’s nothing to argue about with your posts. You didn’t add facts or opinions not already brought up by shake. Everyone read BBS, we know what he said. Shake pointed out that Phil said that Bob practied.

And pictures. Picture threads are so 1999. If you’re going to post pics, make them nude.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like pictures

I have a funny picture that I would post here, but I am too stupid to figure out how to post pictures. All I can do is use the quote, italic and bold function.

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

in the comment box, do you see the little picture of a tree?

click it, and put in the address of the picture you wanna post.

voila!

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 6, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

To get the address for the picture,

right click on the picture, and click on “Copy Picture Location.”

I forever thank Shake for introducing me to that trick.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can do this from a saved picture on my computer? I was confused by the “address” part because I don’t want to use Internet addresses, just link to a picture that I already have saved within the computer.

I promise I am not this computer illiterate.

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Go to Photobucket.com

register yourself, upload your pictures and then you can post them here.

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 6, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I use Flcikr

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 6, 2009 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

OOPS misspelled Flickr

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 6, 2009 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

but to be fair....

doing that is called hotlinking, and it steals bandwidth from wherever the picture is located. So to be a nice internet person, you should either use pictures from a picture site that offers hosting or sites that allow hotlinking.

I don’t judge hotlinking myself, but beware that sometimes your picture won’t show up, but another with a not so nice message. :D

Personally I use Photobucket.com

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 6, 2009 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmmm....

I had never heard of that before. Luckily, I always preview my posts where I include a picture in it to make sure the pic came through OK. That would appear to be a good defense against that too.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

here is an example...

bandwith stealing Pictures, Images and Photos

or half of an example lol. you get the picture (c wut i did ther!) :D

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 6, 2009 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

well its nice to know

that when Cass makes an ass of himself, you’ll be here to clarify his words for him.

Those quotes from Cass are in the original article. You posted the quotes from Phil B. Cass added nothing but an insightful picture (that you drew, I’m guessing?). Seriously, this is nothing personal against Cass, I think he’s a douchebag of epic proportions, but he makes a lot of retarded posts that I don’t comment on. This is just really dumb. He doesn’t offer in either his first post here he posts the godfuckingdamnit pic or in this post where he posts your pic, any comment/thoughts/facts/opinions disagreeing with the article. All he does is make unfunny, unwitty, useless comments about how Bob Sanders actually did practice, and didn’t just walk around carrying a helmet.

Now, maybe I’m wrong, and I’m sure BBS will let me know, but I could have sworn that BBS was being HEAVILY sarcastic and making fun of Bob iwhen he said that.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK,

this is getting seriously out-of-hand. You say that it’s not personal, but everyone can see that you have a personal grudge against me.

but you need to drop the personal vendetta on Cass.

All you do with your comments toward me is attack me. I don’t know what originally caused you to hate my guts, but I’m done with it. For the good of Stampede Blue, I’m done responding to any of your comments. If you choose to respond to my comments with random attacks, I’ll let other people handle it, if they so choose.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

again

If i had a personal grudge against you, I would do a better job of it. You make a lot of uninformed, matter of fact, talking out of your ass posts, and I’ve commented on a very small percentage of them. In fact, I would dare say you’ve commented on as many of mine as I have of yours. The difference would be, when you follow it up with more non-sense, I don’t go, ‘lol, that Cass, like Drunk uncle Tony that sticks his toes in the apply pie during thanksgiving’, I actually just continue to point it out.

You still haven’t added anything to the conversation, btw. You’re calling this a hack article, you’re ridiculing it, all because you feel like BBS didn’t know that Bob Sanders practiced.

So, since Cass is no longer responding to me, I need someone to answer this for me (desperately), if someone were to say,

“BBS’ article is a hack article and can’t be taken seriously because BBS can’t read what Phil B. wrote about Bob Sanders’ (and added pretty pictures)

this would be called a _ _______ attack.

First person to fill in the blanks wins a special prize.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

this would be called a _ _______ attack.

Brett Favre?

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

tip

not to dive in to someone else’s argument, but typically the “I’m done with this/I’m not responding to you anymore” schtick is more genuine when it happens without a big proclamation about it. I know you’re not doing it on purpose and aren’t the huge attention whore he claims… but that post is very much a “look at me as I take the high road!” post.

If you’re going to post pics, make them nude.

I’m going to have to agree with this. FacePalm and Lolcats and all the other stupid memes were hardly funny the first time. They’re definitely not funny the eleventy billionth time.

(The difference here is that I know that you’re young and care about the Colts… which makes it all OK)

by willyduer on Oct 6, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

pauvre petit bébé

If you were doing things for the good of Stampede Blue, you would both shut up. Or perhaps behave as if this blog might be a place in which people posit their opinions and (I hope) expect that they be discussed with a modicum of civility or even reason. If someone is being a so called “attention whore” then ignore him. If someone is making baseless attacks on random people, IGNORE HIM. Either way, nothing gets said.

Just please for God’s sake don’t ruin the site with your childish spat.

by egp the great on Oct 6, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's about objective reporting....

just report the facts, leave the bias and shitty opinions out of it. I don’t think that’s asking too much.

by harbaughmyhero on Oct 6, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh wow

I wasn’t expecting to see that piece of “artwork” again.

I do agree somewhat with Spazmo about it’s importance to the article as a whole. It stands fine without the misinterpretation of the Phil B quote. I think it’s wrong for additional reasons.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

So do I,

but other people were already handling the other reasons the article were wrong, so I decided to attack it a different way.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

But by “Different way” you mean the way that shake already did, 100 posts earlier, right?

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

No,

different way as in including all of the quotes that BBS said that suggest he didn’t know that Bob Sanders practiced. I approached it a different way than Shake.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is what happens when college students get bored.

by Cassieper on Oct 6, 2009 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boys...

just kiss and make up or I will have Bob Sanders come and visit you both.

"If me and King Kong went into an alley, only one of us would come out. And it wouldn't be the monkey."
"I don't really trust a sane person."
"I never met a man I didn't want to fight." The one and only Lyle Alzado

by TRDean on Oct 6, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

but would Bob be questionable?

Ass beating Injury Report:

Questionable – Bob Sanders (knee)

Would Melvin Bullitt fill in if Bob couldnt beat our asses?

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep, and I doubt you would know the difference LOL!!!

"If me and King Kong went into an alley, only one of us would come out. And it wouldn't be the monkey."
"I don't really trust a sane person."
"I never met a man I didn't want to fight." The one and only Lyle Alzado

by TRDean on Oct 6, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could take Bob

He’s a pussy cat!

Or, I’d just change my name to practice, and he’d avoid me like the plague!

Or, … okay okay, no more bob jokes..

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bob takes practice seriously

they had to start holding him out of practices at Iowa after he separated the starting RBs shoulder. He practices like he plays.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

He is just joking...

you Iowa boys are so serious.

"If me and King Kong went into an alley, only one of us would come out. And it wouldn't be the monkey."
"I don't really trust a sane person."
"I never met a man I didn't want to fight." The one and only Lyle Alzado

by TRDean on Oct 6, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't want any part of this but

There are five guys outside my office wondering why I am laughing my ass off. Very entertaining…I don’t care who you are.

by tim55 on Oct 6, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

which, this year, would be

not at all? :P

im just bustin your chops

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

lost in all of this nonsense

I actually love Bob Sanders -

I still remember the Monday night game (i think it was Monday night, it was done by Al and John, but I think this was before monday night moved to ESPN?) in 2006 when the Colts were going into Foxborough and Bob had been having his typical ‘will he won’t he’ year, and then he was on the field and I said outloud, we’re going to win. Thats what Bob meant to the team

But sometime between 2006 and 2009, whether it was just the fact that the team got so used to him being gone (like a pornstar getting so used to sex that it doesnt do it for em anymore), or the fact that defense, as a whole, has gotten a lot better since then, he just doesn’t have the same impant. I want

Gary Brackett back, because I feel that Gary Brackett is a significant overall improvement over Keiaho. (Freddie has been great so far, but against a more well-balanced attack where he’s not able to key on one thing, I think he’ll be a liability more than Gary). I want Hayden back because I think… come on, do I need to go into Hayden v The Cushion? I want DFree back over Brock or Dawson. I love Raheem. He’s a great player. He makes a lot for what he is (a 3rd DE and 3rd DT, versatile linemen that is good against the run and pass, and could definitely start for 1 or 2 games if needed), but he’s not Free (by the by, I had the same reaction as BBS did when I saw Free active Sunday, Bob would never play hurt. Free played injured. And don’t give me this, Freeney’s wasnt as bad as Bobs, stuff, you can easily create further injury on a torn muscle by being the tasmanian devil).

On the other hand, I don’t pine for the return of Bob or Gonzo, because I don’t feel they’re that much of an improvement over their replacement. This defense has been real f’in good in 3 of 4 games this year – I have high hopes for it when it fields all 11 starters. In my mind, all 11 starters are:

Freeney, Johnson, Johnson, Mathis, Session, Brackett, Hagler, Hayden, Powers, Bullitt, Bethea. Sanders and Jackson, at this point, are like sub package players. I would love to see a dime package with Sanders and Jackson on the field, both of them playing the slots. They would be like Safety/Linebacker/Corner hybrids on the field. Could blitz, play the draw, and cover effectively, without sacrificing too much if people decide to run.

And, not to sound like Im BBS ballwashing, Ive disagreed with articles Ive read of his in the past, but I, too, took a strong dislike to Bill Polians comments about, ‘Fans will be happy to have Bob for 12 of 16 games’. No? He’s taking up the salary of a 16 game starter (i’m not starting a rich player should play, debate, I’m merely saying that despite being 4 and 0, that salary could be used to upgrade a team that still has long term question marks). He can’t stay on the field after these long delays. And as I’ve said, I don’t think he’s that much of an upgrade over Melvin. Will be happy to have him prove me wrong, I miss Bobzilla.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bob who?

I forgot he was even still a Colt.
All I know is, the Colts always play the best man. Well, most of the time.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 6, 2009 2:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Cmon

Sorgi has been carrying Peyton for six years. What? You didn’t know Sorgi named his clipboard Peyton?

by tim55 on Oct 6, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's funny, MY clipboard is named Peyton too.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 6, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

LMAO...........yes.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 6, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

He just wants to play.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Oct 6, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Glad to have Bob back...

and for all the fighting here:

What do you want me to do?  LEAVE?  Then they'll keep being wrong!

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 6, 2009 4:34 PM EDT reply actions  

LOL

I like

"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

by AceOfSpades on Oct 6, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

This thread was ruined by bitching

This is an interesting topic but a bunch of people being idiots ruined it. -1 for all of you who were involved.

"Brett Favre was a man who thought he was retired, but he knew it wouldn't last."

by Colts Homer on Oct 6, 2009 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

don’t give me a minus 1… it will totally ruin my final grade.

Wait, you didn’t mean me, well then carry on. :)

/is it sunday yet?

Go Colts!

by Marked Hoosier on Oct 6, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm willing to admit I'm an idiot

but there are still points to post on – if you have a thought, you should share it and get it back on track.

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

All I’m going to say is, if it takes “convincing” or “explanations” for anyone to realize that a healthy Bob Sanders should take every defensive snap he can (yes over Melvin Bullitt), then it’s not worth my time. Have fun with this one.

Thanks to MarkFive05 I have a new theme video that I hope you all will remember me by: BAM BAM

by bamock on Oct 6, 2009 5:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Okay...

Let me clarify… to me, healthy = in playing shape.

Thanks to MarkFive05 I have a new theme video that I hope you all will remember me by: BAM BAM

by bamock on Oct 6, 2009 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay...

In that case I agree with you, however I don’t think anyone expects Sanders to be a 100 % yet.

by jocre on Oct 6, 2009 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he's not 100%

This article is moot. He won’t start and very likely won’t play. If he takes the field, the coaches, medical team, and top brass all agree he’s 100%. Believe it.

Thanks to MarkFive05 I have a new theme video that I hope you all will remember me by: BAM BAM

by bamock on Oct 6, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

welcome back bob….THE HITMAN COMETH

bob just standing on the opposite side of the field makes every offensive team lined up against them and him afraid. he doesnt even have to make a tackle and they are aware of him.

although bullitt has done a very good job taking over for him while he is injured…Im putting the guy out there who can make a difference just by his presence and oh ps I think alot of you have a very short memory of bob on the field. I cant even believe this is a discussion.

have we all decided dallas clark is worth his contract yet….dont forget, a few too many colts fans were saying he wasnt worth the $$ and he has to many drops. funny how a few games of greatness changes all that!

by kinnickcolt on Oct 6, 2009 6:07 PM EDT reply actions  

here's what i read!
However, as Aaron Schatz pointed out in the Colts chapter of Pro Football Prospectus 2007, the defense allowed more yards per carry in the four regular season games Sanders played (5.55) than in the 12 he didn’t (5.27).

and for more on how the Colts defense didnt change in the 06 playoffs, read here [note: I’m not saying I agree 100% with this article, but there are actually numbers to back up certain things, too]

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/extra-points/2007/inexplicable-defense-partially-explained

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 6:20 PM EDT reply actions  

those 4 games were against the #6, #7, #18 and #20 run Os by YPC

One of my favorite things about FO is that they consider opponents. I’m disappointed in them for not talking about it there.

also if you look at the boxscores from those games it was just big games from the Giants and Titans, with Vince Young’s 9 for 78 really skewing the total.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2006120308/2006/REG13/colts@titans
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2006091012/2006/REG1/colts@giants

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Oct 6, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

here's a bigger sample size

from last year. I didn’t factor in opponent, because I’m not going to go to FO and look up their DVOAs, etc… it was hard enough going back to last year and looking it all up:

Sanders Games:

Game 1 – 39 cars 183 yards, 4.7 avg (bears)

Game 2 – 36 cars 179 yards, 5.0 avg (vikings)*

Game 8 – 32 cars 140 yards, 4.4 avg (Patriots)

Game 9 – 27 cars 59 yards, 2.2 avg (Steelers)*

Game 13- 24 cars 82 yards, 3.4 avg (Bengals)

Game 15- 27 cars 105 yards, 3.9 avg (Jaguars)

Game 17- 33 cars 167 yards, 5.1 avg (Chargers)

218 cars 915 yards, 4.20avg

Sanders Games:

Game 1 – 39 cars 183 yards, 4.7 avg (bears)

Game 2 – 36 cars 179 yards, 5.0 avg (vikings)*

Game 8 – 32 cars 140 yards, 4.4 avg (Patriots)

Game 9 – 27 cars 59 yards, 2.2 avg (Steelers)*

Game 13- 24 cars 82 yards, 3.4 avg (Bengals)

Game 15- 27 cars 105 yards, 3.9 avg (Jaguars)

Game 17- 33 cars 167 yards, 5.1 avg (Chargers)

218 cars 915 yards, 4.22avg

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

ahh, im a douchebag

i somehow copied over my bullitt numbers… this sucks. Anyhow, Bob Sanders defenses were 218, 915, 4.2. Bullitt Defenses were 269, 1136, 4.22.

Sorry that this list is going to be incomplete, but it was a pain in the ass to do the first time (ESPNs site loads slow as molasses for me).

by SpazMo on Oct 6, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

our 202lb defensive tackle

again, solid point with your run numbers. maybe Bob shouldn’t be our starting defensive tackle, he is giving up so many yards afterall.
Smart observation.

by feist! on Oct 9, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

We dont need Bob

in the regular season. I wish he would sit out until week 15…play two meaningful games, maybe 3 before the playoffs and then be healthy for the playoffs. The years he’s played all 16 games he was dinged up come playoff and we didnt win a single game.

by fc3worships on Oct 6, 2009 6:53 PM EDT reply actions  

4W 0L QUIT IT. LET MEDICAL STAFF DO THEIR JOB.

by kolt guy on Oct 6, 2009 7:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Being the better football player has nothing to do with durability

Just because that affects a player’s rating in Madden doesn’t mean that’s how it works in real life. Durability adds value to the player, but it does not mean he should be starting over a player who is better in all other aspects other than durability. What if Peyton could only play 7 games a year? I can understand the argument in wanting to go in a different direction for our starting quarterback in the long run, but as long as he is on the roster then you play him while he healthy.

The defense is playing at a very high level? Not quite. Yeah, they played well against a high powered Cardinals team that has always been one dimensional in their favor. They played pretty well against a Jaguars team that they had prepared a month for. They beat up on an offense that had absolutely zero playmakers outside of a receiver with good hands. When we faced a healthy offense with playmakers at multiple skill positions both in the backfield and standing out wide, they held onto the ball for over 45 minutes. Our defense has not faced a true test. What happens if they face the Saints? What about the Vikings? Truth is, we don’t know a thing about our defense yet. Right now they’re playing better than ever in the Peyton era, but they are not at a very high level. They are playing at an above average level compared to the rest of the teams in the league, which is much better than what we in Indy are used to.

by Daniel B on Oct 6, 2009 7:41 PM EDT reply actions  

excellent points

It’s way too early to proclaim this defense as one that is a top shelf product. Better depth, better scheme, bigger/stronger playmakers. Sander’s can only help an improving defense. Unbelievable to me that we even have the luxury to complain about the guy. How many other teams would hope for that type of luxury?

by feist! on Oct 9, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

bob sanders has earned the starting ss job

i think what polian thinks is that until bullit gets the defensive player of the year award then bob is gonna stick and miss the games that he has to to recover and when he comes back hes gona take the starting job sooooo im loyal to bob i dont hold the injuries against him you guys should really see that because our weak ass d line he had to throw his body at bigger bodys and dont tell me that bullit could do that and not get hurt because if melvin did what bob did then he wouldnt come out alive sooo i dont underestimate bobs toughness its just that he throws himself at bigger bodies for the sake of a win so thats why to me bob can come and miss all he wants cuz in my book hes earned that starting job until he retires.

"You only get intercepted when you don't know what your doing, I knew what I was Doing".
Johnny Unitas

by 805 on Oct 6, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Bob should be eased back in...

Just like with Jackson at DB, give him a package and let him go at it. When Gonzo gets back, we’re not going to tell Garcon, “Great job, buddy! Your game-breaking speed, massive improvement, and contributions to the franchise have been rewarded… with a warm seat on the bench.”

Bob was D MVP and honorable mention for the All-Decade team behind Polamalu and Reed. You don’t waste that level of talent on special teams. You do, however, have to respect Bullitt and make sure he feels appreciated, b/c when it’s contract time, you don’t want one of our most consistent players leaving just b/c we handled this situation poorly. Bob is great, but football is the Ultimate TEAM Sport. Ease back in, but don’t forget about Bullitt.

by abeas1 on Oct 6, 2009 9:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Hork my article?

Blue – I’m back for five minutes and you hork my fanpost? Thanks Bra! :-)

by PaytonMenning on Oct 7, 2009 2:37 AM EDT reply actions  

what a great point!

Hey Big Blue Shoe,
Great insight about Sanders playing on Special Teams. I am surprised that you didn’t add the point that he would have to earn his playing time there as well. Here is the deal, Sanders is going to start because he has a contract that pays him 37 million. Every Colts fan is frustrated with his injury status. My god, when the Colts announced that he was having “clean up” surgery during the offseason, we all saw this scenario unfold. However, the reality is that Bob is an elite player when healthy and he is our team’s 37 million dollar contract. He will play and Bullitt will back up this year. Next year may be a different story. The other factor that you did not mention involved last year’s front 4 or more specifically the linebacker sized crew we had “stuffing” the middle. The unneccesary pounding that Sanders took by taking on a runner at full steam, time and time again, may not impact his health this year as it has in the past. I am not ready to give up on Sanders.

by feist! on Oct 9, 2009 5:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Stats Prove It: Brady Is Now a Choker

Recent FanPosts

Img_0497-comp_small
Colts Mock Draft
Small
Tony Ugoh
Small
Jim Irsay on Peyton Manning Last Week
Small
next years' starting lineup
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Small
Colts Mock 1.0
Indianapolis-colts_small
Indianapolis Colts 2012 NFL Draft Mock W/ TRADE SCENARIO
Small
Mock Draft 5.0
Small
What would you Choose?
Bob_small
The media's hatred towards the "scrambling" QBs will continue...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Sbmanning_small Stew Blake