Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Why I (dis)like Peyton Manning

It's not that I intentionally hate the man.  In fact, I don't.  Hate is too strong of a word for a player on a rival fan base's team.  Dislike?  That's a better word in my humble opinion.  But it's not dislike because I think the man is a douche.  Far from it.  It's dislike because of an obvious level of talent.

I'm not blind to the fact that Fivehead is on pace to have a record breaking season when yardage is the yardstick - 2,545 yards to be exact.  And we're only halfway through the season.  Now, some will claim that he should garner another NFL MVP.  I would agree IFF ("if and only if" for those not familiar with logic) Manning blasts the numbers in the regular season to a point where it's impossible to ignore.  Let's say, for instance, that Tom Brady manages to lead the Patriots to the the playoffs.  Wouldn't that make a serious case for MVP nods?  I mean, isn't that essentially what Peyton did last year?

 

There are many reasons why I dislike the man, but it has little to do with emotion.  It's purely his level of play and the fact that he manages to give the Patriots fits on a regular basis.  As an outsider looking in, the frenetic pace set by an Indy offense is interesting to watch, from a purely scholarly perspective.  The hurry up offense, commanded by Manning, is a potent weapon in Indy's arsenal.  It tires defenses out.  It gives little time for adjustment and when a defense adjusts, Manning and his offense can change quickly.  Slowing that train down is the best option.  Forcing Manning and the offense to move a little slower is, IMO, the key to beating this team.

Now, onto why I like Manning.  This will sound twisted, but I think he's made my team and Tom Brady better players.  The obvious comparison would be the Lakers and Celtics, Magic and Larry.  Each made the other better because they kept raising the bar, upping the level of play.  The other had to keep pace or fall by the wayside.  Such is the case with our 2 teams and quarterbacks.  There can be no sloughing off, no downtime, no taking a day off.  Bill Belichick said as much after a nice 27-17 win against Miami.

During the locker room speech at the end of the game, Belichick told the players that they were back to practice on Monday to prepare for Indy.  Wednesday wouldn't cut it.  That's how serious NE takes a matchup with the Colts.  And I can tell you it's the same for the fanbase, too.  The chatter on local Boston radio stations has been non-stop.  It's much busier than any other matchup.  Well, maybe an upcoming Jets game will get the blood boiling (I sooooo want to hang an L on Rex "pompous windbag" Ryan's face).

This is Sunday Night Football.  This is cool stuff.  This is Colts vs. Patriots.  Does it get any better?

Comment 64 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

MVP is not for playoffs

“Now, some will claim that he should garner another NFL MVP. I would agree IFF (”if and only if" for those not familiar with logic) Manning manages to lead Indy to an AFCCG win and further."

The flaw here is that the MVP voting is done after the regular season and prior to the playoffs.

by JTBLA on Nov 12, 2009 8:09 PM EST reply actions  

bah dont edit

 now all of those that already posted are gonna look like CRAZY PEOPLES

Being an asshole doesn't make you wrong. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np6vAuS0KNs

by SpazMo on Nov 12, 2009 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Nah

Totally admitted my stupid error already and the text is quoted above by JTBLA.

Blogger at SBNation's Colts blog, Stampede Blue

by MaPatsFan on Nov 12, 2009 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

bah

if BBS edited an article every time he was wrong there’d only be one article on this site, and it’d still be a work in progress!;)

Being an asshole doesn't make you wrong. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np6vAuS0KNs

by SpazMo on Nov 12, 2009 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

btw im bahing so much i might be a sheep, keep cass away from my backside

Being an asshole doesn't make you wrong. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np6vAuS0KNs

by SpazMo on Nov 12, 2009 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Hehe....

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.

by Cassieper on Nov 13, 2009 7:49 AM EST up reply actions  

beat me to it. It's a regular season award

if Brady had the best efficiency numbers for a QB in the league, with nearly as much total value as a less efficient but more prolific passer. Then I’d be ok with him winning an MVP.

That’s what Peyton did last year.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Nov 12, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

To go one further

Giving the MVP to Brady for making the playoffs “because that’s what Manning did last year” is waaaay off base. Brady will have taken a team that went 11-5 without him and gotten them to what, 12-4? 13-3? So he added 2 wins over what a guy who hadn’t started since HS got and and you want him to get the MVP for that? No, sorry.

Wholly carrying his team might do it, Statistical dominance might do it. Lats minute-come-from-behinds might do it. But not 1-2 more Ws than some no-name palooka got year.

You also have to consider the competition—this year has a crazy number of QBs with high ratings. The winter weather and injuries should winnow that down to 2-4 QBs over 100, but if you have seven guys over 100, and a few of them on 13+ win teams (Favre, Manning, Brees, Ben) how can you justify saying Brady gets the MVP for 12 wins, a QB rating of 99, and no games (so far) where he has hoisted the team on his back and created the W out of thin air? Last year Rivers had the numbers, maybe Cutler too, but their 8-8 teams made voters queasy. That won’t be a problem for a lot of candidates this year (well, Rivers again).

Right now, almost a knock against 18 and 12 is their low-scoring Ds. Brees has had a lot more to overcome (a D that allows more points), but of course he has a top-10 run game. Favre has AP. Ben has a good D and decent run support. Who the hell knows?

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 12, 2009 11:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Just one thing to nitpick

Not saying I agree or disagree with your take on the MVP, but since its awarded before the 1st playoff games are played, its impossible to factor in post season success. Its a regular season award, like it or not. I think part of the problem is the super bowl mvp isnt treated like other sports, hockey, for instance. The winner of the Conn Smythe is the playoffs MVP. Now, sure, the people that vote might weigh the performance in the finals heavily than other rounds, but you’ll rarely, if ever, see someone have 3 bad rounds, then play lights out in the finals and win the Conn Smythe. I’m surprised Baseball didn’t get some scorn for that this year, when Matsui, who was clearly the Game 6 MVP, probably wasn’t any higher than 4th on the NYY MVP for the playoffs (behind atleast ARod, CC, and Damon, and probably Jetah as well (sorry to bring up the yankees, just an easy point of comparison)).

Anyhow, I think Manning is the clear front runner for MVP at this point – 2 young WR, a crappy OL, an invisible running game, and still under 29min/g of TOP and only around 60 plays per game (which is still way higher than past years, but still lower than most teams in the league). I know that it gets tired for other teams fans to hear, but he carries this team, and yes, we colts fans are way over protective of him, but I think most of us know where we’d be without him, and it wouldn’t be 11-5 and fighting for a playoff spot in the last week of the year (not a dig at you, just the truth).

Being an asshole doesn't make you wrong. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np6vAuS0KNs

by SpazMo on Nov 12, 2009 8:11 PM EST reply actions  

You forgot about the Favre factor

It might be given as a “lifetime achievement award” or something. Stranger things have happened when Lord Favrequat is involved.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 12, 2009 10:02 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

yea, ive always wondered if the media would be opposed to giving manning

the all time high 4th when they REALLY want Brady to have it..;)

Being an asshole doesn't make you wrong. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np6vAuS0KNs

by SpazMo on Nov 13, 2009 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

disagree

Brady isn’t even in the discussion this year

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 13, 2009 7:56 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

It’s Manning vs Brees. I’m not sure anyone else is in the discussion. I have Manning slightly ahead at this point for being more consistent, but you can’t ignore what Brees has done. I thought Brees should have won last year, so it might be poetic justice if he steals one from Manning this time.

by invisibulman on Nov 13, 2009 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

+12

Favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre favre…………..

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is my dad's favorite scene from one of my all-time favorite shows. Full of win, IMO.

by Cassieper on Nov 13, 2009 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

lofavre

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Nov 13, 2009 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd for the Shrek reference alone.

Favrequat, classic.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Nov 13, 2009 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

You know,

what I conclude from what you said is that the only way you can hate Manning (being objective) is because of his great talent and because he is kind of a “football nerd”. Brady, on the other hand, is the opposite. Before this year, I respected Tom Brady and admired his talent. Even thought he frustrated me when he played vs the Colts, I never, ever used the word “HATE” against him. When he injured his knee, I fell really sorry for him and wished he weren’t out for the season. This has changed this year. Brady has been arrogant, ridiculously selfish (Ex. the poor man who stole his garbage) and a moron. He looked like an idiot after what he said to Plaxico Burress prediction of the SB, but this year’s “celebrating the flag” won the prize. I still respect Brady and admire him as a player, but now I can’t say I like him, not at all (and I think I have excuses)

GO COLTS!

by fpacheco on Nov 12, 2009 8:20 PM EST reply actions  

Brash and baseless accusations

Arrogant, ridiculously selfish, and a moron. How so?

The “garbage” thing turned out to be two guys who went onto his property and stole some urns from in front of his house. There was nothing to do with garbage, Brady knew nothing about it until afterwards, and the guys were lucky he didn’t press charges.

Brady was told what Burress predicted and disputed it. Why wouldn’t he? The Patriots had scored more than that all year. He wasn’t spouting it off to the media to prove anything, he was responding to a statement by a reporter. And is that your only example of him being a moron? If the Pats won, would you be calling Burress a moron?

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 12, 2009 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/local/071109_stranger_pays_mans_debt_to_tom_brady_071109

Some guy paid the bill for the homeless guy instead of Brady. This was after it was in the news. You can’t tell me Brady didn’t know at that point and couldn’t suck up the money.

by tapper on Nov 12, 2009 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm curious about your sources too

Those five links are to the same story, from the same day (July 10) printed in different places and the bottom one was from the Boston Herald Inside Track gossip page. If you read the story, the guy was a 61 year old convicted bank robber, released from prison 5 years earlier, but you choose to believe that he wasn’t stealing. Maybe he thought the money he stole was in the bank’s trash too.

Police caught him on a surveillance camera so it’s not like that point is even debatable. Funny that you think it’s okay for anyone to walk onto someone’s property to steal something… or is it just because the home belonged to Brady that it was okay.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 13, 2009 12:14 AM EST up reply actions  

for me...

it was trash. If I’m throwing it away, then obviously I don’t want it. Why would you sue someone for taking something you were getting rid of?

Bob Sanders does not play Hide-and-Seek, He plays HIDE and PRAY-HE-DOES-NOT FIND-YOU!

by coltsfan723 on Nov 13, 2009 12:51 AM EST up reply actions  

The urns were not in his trash

They were on his property, not with or near any trash.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 13, 2009 7:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Marima, come on,

Who WOULDN’T call Burress a moron, for so many reasons.

Ya gotta come up with a better one than that.

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 12, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Oddly I agree

If Brady does manage to lead his team to a 2nd round playoff game then he is deserving of an MVP. Similar to Manning he has come off a serious knee surgery, I have great respect for Brady coming back from that injury (I have had the same injury). Dare I say that Co-MVPs this year for # 12 and 18 would be fitting and just.

Now feel free to tear me a new one for those comments.

by canadiancolts on Nov 12, 2009 8:21 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

god if p has to share another one...

the one in 03 (right?) was such a joke. Not trying to disrespect the dead, but McNair deserved that MVP as much as you and me.

Being an asshole doesn't make you wrong. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=np6vAuS0KNs

by SpazMo on Nov 12, 2009 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

True

That was a little wrong. This one would be different if they split it then it was in 03.

by canadiancolts on Nov 12, 2009 8:29 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, and that year there was no voter from Indy

The guy who replaced him was from St Louis I think and voted for McNair.

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 12, 2009 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

For one thing, you can't compare Brady coming back from injury the way Peyton did.

Peyton missed training camp and time with his recievers, Brady did not.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
"As I grow older, the list of people who can kiss my ass grows longer"-Ancient Hoosier Proverb.

by Indy Lori on Nov 12, 2009 8:33 PM EST reply actions  

Huh?

Brady missed a whole season with his receivers while Manning missed training camp. I’ll haved to call you that one.

Blogger at SBNation's Colts blog, Stampede Blue

by MaPatsFan on Nov 12, 2009 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

yea it is very similar situation.

it was a little diffrent as manning had the surgery missed training camp and then started the first game. not though brady in a way had it worse though. he missed a full season which is even more time than manning missed i must say. what i think lori was tring to say is that brady did get training camp however he did lose the timing. i do think mannings comeback from surgery may have been a little more impressive but im glad brady is finding himself again

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!

by TheAngelsColts on Nov 12, 2009 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes Brady missed a whole season, but he had LOTS of time in practice.

Peyton had to start the season without that benefit.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
"As I grow older, the list of people who can kiss my ass grows longer"-Ancient Hoosier Proverb.

by Indy Lori on Nov 12, 2009 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Not the same

A year off is tough, but they still got plenty of prep time heading into the season. They never had to play any games with an unfit/unprepared QB – just a rusty one. Brady’s health has been 100% this year. He had to overcome some [totally understandable] mental and accuracy issues early, which he has done very well, but I don’t think him taking the team to the playoffs would be as impressive as Manning last year. Manning pretty much singlehandedly won 2 games they didn’t deserve while playing on one leg early in the year (I actually think his 9 game streak is far less impressive than the early ugly wins… the streak had some awful teams in it). To be honest, even if Peyton sets every record in the book this year, I think he was a more obvious MVP last year than this year. This year the rest of the team is better, even with the injuries. Last year it really was all about Peyton.

Maybe it’s just that I’m still of the opinion that the Patriots are an extremely deep and skilled team with the best coach… but I don’t consider Brady to be carrying them at all, even though the numbers compare favorably. (And I swear I’m not basing that on the fact that they won 11 with Cassel – last year their schedule was much, much easier.) It’s not that TB isn’t playing great football. But I still think that they rely on him far less than the Colts rely on Manning.

All that said, my expectation for Sunday night is that Brady will probably outplay Manning. Just a hunch I have. I hope I’m wrong. But I’m not one of those people who think Brady isn’t in the same league as Manning or anything. I’m just not that sold on his performance this season being anything MVP caliber.

by willyduer on Nov 12, 2009 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Brady will probably outplay Peyton?

PEYTON WILL PROBABLY KEEP PACE WITH BRADY, AND PROBABLY WIN!

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
"As I grow older, the list of people who can kiss my ass grows longer"-Ancient Hoosier Proverb.

by Indy Lori on Nov 12, 2009 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that

Peyton will set a new standard for QB play on Sunday! Go Colts!

by Ayrshire on Nov 12, 2009 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I have to stand by Lori here

Physically, Brady’s road back was MUCH more daunting. But he had 11 months to do it.

Manning had a lower hurdle to overcome, but it took away 2 months of practice just before the season.

Brady had practiced from about June through August. Manning missed July and August heading into the season. The argument is that if Brady had been well, throwing and catching with receivers in Nov/Dec/Jan has very little impact on how he opens the season in Sept.

Based on the above, I’d say that Brady should have been up to speed sooner (more practice w/receivers in preceeding 3 months), but have more long-term issues such as mechanics, planting, etc.

Manning could not run the Colts signature stretch play most of last year, which hurt both the run and pass game. I do not know if there is a similar play in the Pats book that requires the QB to sprint, then stop short and pass.

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 12, 2009 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I made a similar post on this topic....

Poll – Will Tom Brady be more game ready to start the season this year than Peyton Manning was in ’08?

Here’s the link:
http://www.stampedeblue.com/2009/6/1/895819/brady-healthier-to-start-09-than

by ColtsFanNChiTown on Nov 13, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is the difference between Brady '09 and Manning '08

First, there were no real good alternatives last year. If Manning (or Brees) puts up similar numbers in the second half, they should get it.

Here’s the bigger one. Manning season last year was more impressive. Firstly, he had surgery literally two weeks before the season started. He was physically injured during the season. On the other hand, Brady’s most recent surgery was 10 months ago. Sure it is hard to recover from, but there are no physical ailments lingering when this year started. What Brady needed was time to shake off rust, to mentally get back into football shape. Manning had to overcome a injury that effected him that year. If anything, Brady’s is less impressive than what Carson Palmer did, because Brady had an extra 4.5 months to rehab.

Also, Manning saw massive inuries around him. His o-line was in taters all year. They had the second worst running game in teh league. He was the sole reason they put up those 9 straight wins to get into the playoffs. Too often, the MVP is given to the offensive player of the year, rather than the true most valuable player (LT over Brees ’06). Manning was the definition of valuable last year.

EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Nov 12, 2009 8:36 PM EST reply actions  

BTW

don’t take this as a knock on what Brady is doing. Tom Brady is a great, great QB, and what he is doing is nothing short of staggering. Yet, what Manning overcame was simply out-of-this-world.

EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Nov 12, 2009 8:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish I was in taters. Sounds delicious!

Heh. I didn’t read this before my post right above but obviously I agree. (Though I’m of the belief that the 9 game win streak was over some easy competition and two of the early wins were more impressive.) But in general, while missing a year certainly sucks, Brady didn’t have the same pressure to rehab WHILE playing. He had more down time, but that down time was at least productive for him.

by willyduer on Nov 12, 2009 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice

I honestly did not even I realize I typed that. That does sound delicious.

EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Nov 12, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

YES! I agree, you said it very well.

Plus the Pats can play well without Brady, witness Cassell.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
"As I grow older, the list of people who can kiss my ass grows longer"-Ancient Hoosier Proverb.

by Indy Lori on Nov 12, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Why I dislike Manning?

It’s either his goofy “aw-shucks” demeanor, his unusual for(teen)head, or both.

But he did have a great skit on SNL with the kids.

Beer is good! And stuff!

by R_Adragna on Nov 12, 2009 9:05 PM EST reply actions  

I'll kill a snitch if I have to

I’m not saying I have. Not saying I haven’t. I’m just saying….

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 12, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I can say much the same about Tom Brady...

… and praise his skill, his ability to utterly burn a blitz, his ability to find an open receiver. But that’s old hat and quite obvious, so let me go somewhere else: There is one credit I can give to Brady that simply will never apply to Manning, and that’s that Manning was expected to be successful from the start. In contrast, Brady was drafted relatively low and languished as a backup for a while. While I’ll never, ever say that Manning didn’t earn his starting position or have to work to get where he’s at – on the contrary, he’s earned it many times over, and worked harder than anyone else I’ve witnessed in football; you have to go to Larry Bird in basketball for a comparable work ethic – Brady started out with a disadvantage that Peyton never had to experience. Who would’ve expected a 6th round QB to be a future Hall of Famer?

Again, I will argue until I’m blue in the face (hey, that’s the Colts color!) that Manning is the better quarterback. No one works harder, and so few in history have such an advanced understanding of the game. But, Brady ranks well up there too, and has gotten to that level from “farther down”, so to speak. And he’s done it without the same arm that Peyton has on top of that! That’s one thing I really, truly respect about Brady. It’s the same thing that I respect about Brackett (an undrafted free agent), Rhodes (who, when he was here rose from being an undrafted backup to being inches shy of the ‘06 Super Bowl MVP), and anyone else who has risen from low expectations. That’s a significant mountain to climb.

I’ll turn around and say that the pressure of super high expectations are their own sort of burden; look at what Alex Smith, Brady Quinn, and Vince Young have had to endure. And I’ll say that Tom Brady was spared that. But that doesn’t diminsh the achievement of either Manning or Brady. The point is that they both overcame burdens that are part and parcel of how they entered the NFL, and did so most admirably. That’s the point I’m trying to make here.

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Nov 12, 2009 9:36 PM EST reply actions  

I'll go a step farther

And say that Brady has never been the focal point of his team. Crazy you say? Think about it…. Peyton came in with all the expectations of being a franchise savior and it’s face. Brady??? He was an after thought who languished one the bench with a team who was pretty decently built, at least compared to the Colts when Peyton joined them.

Brady also had the Patriots defense to bail him out while truly growing into the position that guys like Marino, Montana, Elway, and even Peyton took from day one. That’s not saying that Brady wasn’t doing it, just saying the expectations and stress weren’t attached to him like those guys.

Brady was able to come in and play well early on, and his defense truly helped him out alot. That is what has allowed Brady to become the Golden Boy while Peyton is continually to this day is shown as not being as great because of fewer SB titles….

Put Peyton on other teams (Steelers, Ravens, Buccaneers, Vikings, Cowboys, Saints, Eagles, Chargers) and the guy would put up identical numbers if not possibly more SB wins….simply to not having to rely on his arm 24/7 to carry his team…

The two best defenses of Peyton’s career with the Colts came in 2007/2008. Ironically, injuries derailed both seasons…..and the inability to once again stop anyone in the run game in the playoffs…

by DevilsReject on Nov 12, 2009 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

How can you say that Brady has never been the focal point for the team?

What’s different is that the Patriots are a team, Brady included. Here, it’s all Manning way over and above any kind of team concept. Manning or bust. I guess I find it a bit of an odd philosophy from the fans – they’re more fans of Manning than they are of the team.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 12, 2009 11:53 PM EST up reply actions  

nah

I don’t see it that way. They just recognize that the team relies on him more than other teams rely on their QBs and appreciate that they’re watching (one of) the best that ever played. I suppose some people root only for Manning, but not most people here.

by willyduer on Nov 13, 2009 12:04 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know why you say that

This is a 18/12 discussion, so of course all the talk is pro-18. But you are a habitue here and have seen plenty of love given to other players.

Maybe if we got a count of jersey numbers in the stands it would give us a good idea. (The NFL probably keeps those nmbers.) I’ll guess that the NFL average is about 40-50% of jerseys are the QB, and the rest scattered among other players (with poor OL guys shafted—only their families wear THEIR jerseys!). Watch the stands on Sunday and count—I’ll bet that maybe 60% of the jerseys are 18, which is reasonable considering he’s a 13-year vet with 3 MVPs to his credit. I mean is he was Joe Flacco (very good but new) I’d expect a lot lower number and if he was Delhomme (old and in a death spiral) I’d guess fewer. I bet Brady jerseys, as a % of the total, are the same as Manning shirts.

Maybe it’s a poor measure of “whom are you a fan of, one guy or the team?” but I have no other guesses as how to measure that. It’s really a weird concept anyway.

I tihnk it’s reasonable for more Indy fans to be 18 fans almost on par with being fans of the team because of the position he was in from day-one. He replaced a popular journeyman vet (Jim Harbaugh) and was a #1 pick, pro bowler in his second year and yo know the rest. Face of the NFL, face of the franchise, etc.

Going back Brady’s start in Boston—pick 199 and nobody but UM grads knew his name for two years. Hey, he won a SB and the MVP, but the focal point of the team was generally the D (in his first start, a 44 point win over Indy, there were two pick-sixes and a 100 yard runner. Brady had roughly a 50% completion rate and was more or less a game manager afterthought.) I’d say he was liked and respected but even in the Corey Dillon years, it was running team with a very good D and an efficient passing game. If not for the SBs (i.e. if he had Indy’s D in those years), He’s be a lesser Ken Anderson or maybe an Archie Manning—good guy, good QB, but that’s it. In 2007, when Moss and Welker came to call, Tom was finally able to become what he always had the potential to be (surprised the shit out of me)—an uber elite QB. But before then, he was not the focal point of the team and didn’t have the burden of carrying the team so often.

To bring this back to “start,” that is why is seems there are so many Manning fans who may seem to put that allegiance before being Colt fans, and so many Pats fans who put that before being a Brady fan. If Manning started to fade and we had AP carrying the ball for 2,000 yards a season for a few more years, you’d see a shift. Same with Brady if he has a couple more years like 2007. Just my opinion, but I think it’s got a pretty sound basis.

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 13, 2009 12:12 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Bobman

You hit it on the nail perfectly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This isn’t about me disrespecting Brady, but the simple fact is it wasnt until about 2003 that Brady even became a name everyone knew……despite his team’s success. Peyton, from day one, has been the name everyone has known….

Brady has been able to show up and just do his thing, as he has never, and I mean, never, truly carried his team year round. Sure, he’s led comebacks, but the Patriots have always done that thru their defense…..

I bet if you dug up all of Brady’s 4th quarter comebacks, you’d find that a majority were started by a turnover created on defense…..while Peyton’s would be more of a last possession following a punt or kickoff…. that alone speaks volumes about the type of field position or backs against the wall situation Peyton has had to fight thru…

When is the last time the Patriots were EVER down 21 pts with 5 min to go and won a game? Or even better, fought thru being down 3 scores to win a playoff game?

Brady has dealt with pressure, but he’s never been the guy who’s had to single handedly carry his team….

by DevilsReject on Nov 13, 2009 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

True, Brady hasn't ever dug himself into a 5 interception hole that he then heroically had to dig the team out of

Whether people knew of Manning before Brady is irrelevant, really, and I’m not going to get into a Brady-Manning stats war because that just proves my point. You’re all Manning, and less Colts. Manning wins games, the Colts defense loses them, or it’s his receivers’ dropped balls, or fumbles. For all the talk about how great a drafter Polian is (and I agree with that), you all sure complain about how bad Peyton’s defense is.

I love Brady, but I love the team first and have read several books about the SB years to tell you that he was more than just a good game manager. Not my opinion, but those of his teammates, trainers and coaches. The only thing consistent about Brady’s receivers over the years is that they keep changing and he never had the luxury of having a Harrison and Wayne to throw to every game for years.

Brady has taken his team to more playoffs (14-3) and more playoff wins then Manning has done with the Colts (7-7). Laugh at them about the SB loss to the Giants, but they at least got there. Where were the Colts that year? One and done. Arguing that playoff and SB wins don’t matter is to discount the whole reason the players are out there.

It’s been said here that it’s the only stat that Brady has over Manning and even then he doesn’t get credit because it was the team, not Brady, that won those games. Unlike the Colts’ playoff attempts where it was Manning that won games and the team that lost them. Do you see how that comes across?

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 13, 2009 7:49 AM EST up reply actions  

part of that...

Is there wasn’t a pro football team here until the 80’s. How long have the Pats been in NE? I don’t really know, but I’m pretty sure it’s longer than the Colts have been in Indy. The Pats have a long standing well established fan base, of course they place their love for team above their love for Tom Brady. Which I think is one of the great things about the Pats is the fans stuck with the team through all those terrible seasons.

The thing is, until Manning came along if you found a Hooiser who watched a lot of pro football (basketball is the preferred sport) they were most likely a Bears fan. And you don’t have to look too long before it becomes apparent that Baltimore fans did not transfer their love for the Colts when they changed cities. Now you can’t turn your head and spit without hitting a Colts fan. And for a great many of them, maybe Manning is what brought them too the Colts but I think they are slowly becoming fans of the team as a whole. I’m a good example. I became a Colts fan because Manning was my favorite college player and was drafted the year I moved to Indiana. It seemed like fate that I become a Colts fan. But if Manning left the team tomorrow, I might wish him well, but I’d still be a Colts fan.

I’m a Hoosier transplant, I grew up in MI where it’s practically illegal not to love the Red Wings. It’s in the water there, you love the team, not just the players. So, it was very different watching the Colts fan base grow and change over the last 12 years. I think over time it will change and the fan base will be more organic, but really Manning has been the first real attraction for the Indianapolis Colts.

So, there are reasons for this, maybe not great ones but there are reasons.

by racer39girl on Nov 13, 2009 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for your insight

I wasn’t thinking of the different histories of both teams, but it certainly puts it into perspective from the view of the fan.

Billy Sullivan was granted an AFL franchise 50 years ago, on November 18, 1959. He had no money and no experience, (and no stadium for years) but somehow managed to keep the team afloat and in New England until impending bankruptcy forced him into selling.

Fans from the older days, even just from the ‘70s and ’80s, remember all too well the way the ownership couldn’t seem to do much right, and even if they did, it managed to screw it right up afterwards.

As good as this run has been, mostly uphill since the Parcells era began, I don’t know of any adult fan that relaxes in the knowledge that the Patriots will forever be a contender. It’s hard not to take what we have right now for granted (both teams in their success this decade) but there’s always that back-of-the-mind niggling reminder that we’re lucky to be witnessing history as it is playing out.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 13, 2009 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

If you truly think...

That every loss in the playoffs is Peyton’s fault….you have issues…. I can show you countless games where Peyton has put up 400 yards offense, scored 35 points….only to watch the defense not get off the field, not get stops on 3rd down, and bottom line just play like a bunch of JV players….

Has Manning laid some eggs in the playoffs? Sure he has….but some of that has been because of the problems on defense as well. Some of that has been Edgerrin James fumbling the rock at the 5 yard line….or even Peyton throwing interceptions….but at the end of the day, I can pinpoint most of the Colts issues in their losses in the playoffs to the inability to stop the run and get stops on 3rd down. Not the offense, but the defense…

by DevilsReject on Nov 13, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

manning vs brady

I ve been a fan of football since 1958, Unitas will always be my favorite. However I must say Brady and Manning are the best I have ever seen. I agree with the writers and experts that rank them even at this time. However, if there has to be a tie breaker, then consider these 2 facts,,,Manning is more durable, and Brady has had a better overall team to support him. I disagree with the bloggers who keep bringing up how much better the Colts receivers were over the Pats receivers (before Moss/Welker).. I say to that, what about the trio of Branch, Givens, Brown,,,while none were hall of famers, all were quality receivers who seldom dropped passes. The big difference is the Pats always had a quality defense, while until this year, at best the Colts were in the middle of pack, and usually well below that. Someone do a study and see how many possesions the Colts averaged per game vs the Pats and I am sure it would reveal that Brady has received more opportunities to throw. In addition, Colts philosophy was to pull Manning when lead was sufficient, while Pats philiosophy seemed to be score as much as possible.
Finally last yr, Pats qb Cassels took them to 11-5 which most of time would lead to playoff berth, look at what Cassels is doing now. Does anyone believe Colts would have been 11-5 with Cassels last yr? No QB has done more with less then Manning, and for this reason if comparing careers rather then immediate,,,I rate Manning superior.

by oldnjcoltsfan on Nov 13, 2009 12:28 AM EST reply actions  

Coaches

Well, maybe an upcoming Jets game will get the blood boiling (I sooooo want to hang an L on Rex “pompous windbag” Ryan’s face).

Hear, hear! I’ll actually be rooting for the Patriots in that game just because of Ryan. He irritates me with his desire to incite controversy.

Of course, I also dislike Rich Rodriguez, so maybe I just have something against coaches with alliterative names.

by Todd S. on Nov 13, 2009 8:48 AM EST reply actions  

It's like bizzaro racer39girl wrote this...

This is almost exactly my feelings about Brady and the Patriots. On the one hand I dislike (I also feel hate is a too strong word) them because they are a tough rival team and you are suppose to dislike your rivals. But truthfully where would the Colts be without them? The Pats force you to beat them, they don’t often beat themselves. Having a team that consistently plays you so tough does elevate the level of play, and that is never a bad thing. And I feel that is something that deserves respect. I can’t stand fans of any team that are so blinded by their own allegiance that they can’t see when a team or player has earned respect.

On a different note, I love this week, for the last several years it’s been the week I circle on my calendar and can’t wait for. Not just because the game is always so good but because the build up is fun! Between the media coverage and the fan back and forth, I just love it! Between the Manning vs. Brady debates and the good natured smack talk, I always enjoy this week. It does bring out the jackasses on BOTH sides but that can’t be helped. Anyone who thinks their team doesn’t have some jackasses in their fanbase is kidding themselves. But from my experience both teams have far more great fans than annoying/rude ones.

So, anyway, great post and thanks for sharing! Looking foward to a great game Sunday!

by racer39girl on Nov 13, 2009 9:51 AM EST reply actions  

That picture makes him look like a douche.

Don't question my fandominium.
"the notorious D.I.B."- samdaman

by dolphinsinbuffalo on Nov 13, 2009 5:33 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Stats Prove It: Brady Is Now a Choker

Recent FanPosts

Img_0497-comp_small
Colts Mock Draft
Small
Tony Ugoh
Small
Jim Irsay on Peyton Manning Last Week
Small
next years' starting lineup
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Small
Colts Mock 1.0
Indianapolis-colts_small
Indianapolis Colts 2012 NFL Draft Mock W/ TRADE SCENARIO
Small
Mock Draft 5.0
Small
What would you Choose?
Bob_small
The media's hatred towards the "scrambling" QBs will continue...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Sbmanning_small Stew Blake