Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Homefield advantage? The Luke's roof (lid)

3942758670_81e8dbe486_medium

Indianapolis Colts, Lucas Oil Stadium (via Indy Wayne)



Yesterday, we all saw how the Luke had its amazing roof opened for a sunny game against the 49ers.

But was it a good thing or a bad thing?

 Well, it seems that, at some plays (mostly in the beginning of the game as I remember), the glare affected our guys, while trying to catch the ball. Passes should've been caught but still, sun was a factor.

I went to colts.com yesterday, and found this:

"STADIUM ROOF OPEN TODAY.  PLEASE DRESS FOR OUTDOOR WEATHER."

Now, I've never been to Indiana, but I assume the weather is quite cold so, maybe they opened it so the sun could warm up the field. But, besides that, I can't really find any other reason of why it would be a good thing to have that thing open.

If it was natural grass, it would be quite useful. It isn't.
If it was during the summer, it would be also useful so you could have some warm environment. Well, its use is mostly for fall or winter (at least for football)

In snowy days, you have to close it or you should close it. For extremely cold days, people would prefer it closed and have heaters do their thing. So , it seems that it would be better if the roof would remain closed. I mean, that's why they played in a dome for several years, right? Thats why they built a stadium that could be closed, right?

As we saw yesterday, and in some other games, the glare is not something we could benefit from. It causes good players to miss some balls.  The crowd does its thing, but the structure does not.

I mean, it's amazing in terms of engineering/architecture but for its use and conditions, I find it like some kind of waste or more than so, it is just in the inappropiate place. I do like it, but it just seems that it would be better to keep it closed. Like a $100 million better.

So, what do you think? Is it useful? For you guys that have been there or live in Indy, how is it better?
 

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The glare

seemed to be a HUGE disadvantage, and should have been known from the first game of the season when it was also apparent. I can’t remember… is the coin toss like in college where the winner can choose to receive the ball (or defer) and the other team chooses the end of the field to defend? If so, the Colts should learn to defend a different goal at the opening of the game (where they get the choice).

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Nov 2, 2009 1:00 PM EST reply actions  

the glare affected clark

D Clark didnt even see the pass in the end zone , that was a TD pass he would have surely caught if the damn roof was closed.

so my vote goes for closing the damn roof for ever

by thebossuzzi on Nov 2, 2009 2:55 PM EST reply actions  

A few things

For the fans, I have to say that having the roof open yesterday was nice. It was chilly, but it was nice to have fresh air blowing around……its friggin football right! All the more reason to get your a** out of the seat, clap and yell for the defense.

I had seats on the North end of the stadium, and there’s no doubt in my mind that the ball gets lost in the sun, and with things hanging from the structure. I think that its a bit louder with the roof closed as well. Im sure once the temperature starts dipping below 40 even on sunny days, that they will close it up.

by MARVININDY on Nov 2, 2009 3:28 PM EST reply actions  

Gamesmanship

This might seem a bit shabby (okay, it is) but we could use the roof as gamesmanship depending on whom we are playing. A bombs-away offense on a sunny day—just make sure the roof is open and we pick the right EZ to defend for the 1/4 to 1/2 of the game that is affected. A stout running team? Might as well close the roof to help reverb fan noise. A team with zero running attack comes to town in Dec and the weather’s iffy—leave it open and hamper their passing game.

I never liked how baseball teams slow down the game for their ground-ball-out-pitchers by leaving the grass long, or speed it up by mowing the grass short depending on their opponent and their starter. But it IS done all the time. New England’s mud and ice pit for the playoffs? (that might predate the Razor, however—is Gillette grass or turf?) “We’ll show those speedy carpet-running dome teams how we use HFA….”

Now I feel ashamed for even suggesting it.

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 2, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

im assuming

that the 49ers won the toss yesterday and elected to receive (since the Colts always seem to elect to receive when they win) so I’m not sure why they chose to go into the sun?

Anyhow, I think it stays closed the rest of the year, since its all big games from here on out, and they’ll want the extra noise, and no more missed TDs because of glare.

by SpazMo on Nov 2, 2009 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I certainly hope so!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Nov 2, 2009 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Gillette is turf

When Gillette first opened, it had grass but one year it was just miserable (the Revolution uses that field too) no matter how many times Kraft had it replaced. During the Bye week that year, a company came in and replaced it in record time with the current turf field.

Pittsburgh, on the other hand, fought the league and kept it’s grass/mudpit field.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 3, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

It was the first time I was cold at a Colts game

I had to buy a ridiculously overpriced hooded sweatshirt because I was freezing in long sleeves. The roof should not be open for 1:00 games. They shouldn’t have even made it retractable in the first place, but I digress.

"Brett Favre was a man who thought he was retired, but he knew it wouldn't last."

by Colts Homer on Nov 2, 2009 8:33 PM EST reply actions  

Duh

If it’s not open for 1:00 games, when should it be open?

Football is an outdoor sport. It’s fall. Stop being such a baby.

by willyduer on Nov 3, 2009 3:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. To me, football is open air stadiums, elements, getting crazy

and playing on a beautiful Fall day, or freezing your butt off in the snow. I wish they had built an outdoor stadium in Indy because football is indeed an outdoor sport in my opinion. Peyton would shine in either environment!

by Ayrshire on Nov 3, 2009 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe they figure

It’s best to get outdoor experience as often as possible.

We don’t get to play all our games under a roof, after all.

by eltharion_doa on Nov 3, 2009 2:41 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Stats Prove It: Brady Is Now a Choker

Recent FanPosts

Small
Coaching staff finalized today...
Small
How to build a championship team
Small
Two more colts assistants
Small
Co-existence
Img_0497-comp_small
Colts Mock Draft
Small
Tony Ugoh
Small
Jim Irsay on Peyton Manning Last Week
Small
next years' starting lineup
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Small
Colts Mock 1.0

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Photo_small nopuntintended

Colts_small emiller17

Sbmanning_small Stew Blake