Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Winning Stats Power Rankings - Week 9

A new week of Power Rankings brings about a new feature:  Defensive Adjusted Rankings.  I'll still be presenting the Non-Adjusted raw rankings, but I think the Adjusted Rankings are a more accurate picture of what is going on in the league.  Here's how I did it:

  • First off, a big thank you to Neil Paine over at Pro-Football-Reference.com, who pointed me to a 5 minute video tutorial on Excel Iterations.  I was struggling mightily with it, and I only got it to work with his help.  Make sure you check out the PFR blog for even more football-related information.
  • I took the average of all games for each team, and I subtracted out the historic average for each stat, so I now have either a plus or minus number for each team.  I did this both on offense and defense.
  • I then found what the average of each team played against, so I could see the level of teams played against.  For example, with DSR, the Colts are 9.3% above average, but opposing defenses they've faced are 4% below average, so I'd start with an adjusted average  of 5.3% above average.
  • Now's the tricky part...since the Colts now have a new figure, it changes each of the defenses they have faced, which would then change the offensive adjustements, etc.  This is where the Excel Iterations come in.  Eventually, the numbers slowly converge until they don't change any more, which are the final adjusted numbers, that are above/below the historic average.  Just add that back in and you're good to go.
  • I ranked the new adjusted numbers the same way as before, and (I think) you have a more accurate representation of the team's strengths.
  • If you want another explanation, here's where I got the idea: PFR.com Simple Ranking System.

Now that you are all thoroughly confused, how about I just show you the results:

Star-divide

Here's the Power Rankings (click on a column header to sort):

Team Power Rankings
Non-Adjusted Adjusted
Offense Defense Total Offense Defense Total
Saints 5 2 1 4 1 1
Patriots 1 6 2 1 8 2
Ravens 3 14 4 3 9 3
Broncos 11 5 7 14 2 4
Colts 2 12 3 2 23 5
Bengals 13 15 13 12 7 6
Packers 7 7 5 11 10 7
Dolphins 14 22 15 10 11 8
Giants 12 8 10 9 13 9
Vikings 8 13 9 13 12 10
Jets 19 3 14 18 4 11
Cowboys 6 19 11 6 21 12
Falcons 10 25 18 7 22 13
Eagles 17 1 6 16 6 14
Steelers 4 20 8 5 25 15
Texans 15 9 12 15 20 16
Cardinals 23 4 16 20 3 17
Chargers 9 26 17 8 29 18
Bears 18 17 19 19 16 19
49ers 26 11 22 27 5 20
Seahawks 21 21 21 23 17 21
Bills 30 16 25 28 15 22
Redskins 20 10 20 22 24 23
Panthers 24 18 23 24 19 24
Chiefs 27 23 26 26 18 25
Titans 28 24 27 30 14 26
Jaguars 16 29 24 17 32 27
Lions 22 31 28 21 28 28
Buccaneers 29 30 30 29 30 29
Browns 32 28 32 31 26 30
Rams 25 32 29 25 31 31
Raiders 31 27 31 32 27 32

Some thoughts:

  • The Colts moved up to #3 in the Non-Adjusted Rankings, but fell to #5 in the Adjusted Rankings.  Why you may ask?  The defense is severely hurt when adjusting for the opposing offenses they have faced, dropping from #12 to #23!  Looking at the teams they've faced, you can see why:  The Dolphins are the best team they've faced, and they are #10, and next is Jacksonville at #17!  If the defense can continue playing well (which they have been) the next 4 weeks, that number is going to shoot up.
  • The biggest movers up when adjusting for defense are the Bengals and Dolphins, who each move up 7 spots.  Biggest losers?  Eagles and Steelers, who dropped 8 and 7 spots, respectively.  I agree with all four of those movements, as you should as well.
  • Even though the Packers have lost to the Vikings twice, they're ranked higher than the Vikings.  I'm guessing everyone's favorite 40 year old QB has something to do with those 2 games.
  • The Jaguars have the worst defense in the league.  Anyone want to disagree after what the Titans did to them last week?

Here's the Strength of Schedule:

Team Strength of Schedule
Non-Adjusted Adjusted
Offense Defense Total Offense Defense Total
Browns 8 1 1 2 5 1
Dolphins 2 8 3 4 1 2
Falcons 4 7 4 1 3 3
Ravens 19 6 8 9 7 4
Bengals 12 3 2 12 6 5
Jets 10 17 12 3 14 6
Broncos 25 5 11 18 4 7
Patriots 17 21 18 5 20 8
Bills 5 23 13 8 17 9
Saints 7 22 15 6 12 10
Raiders 3 13 7 10 10 11
Titans 18 2 5 31 2 12
Lions 15 4 6 19 9 13
Buccaneers 1 20 10 11 15 14
Chargers 26 15 17 14 16 15
Chiefs 11 10 9 24 8 16
Bears 30 9 19 26 11 17
49ers 20 12 14 21 13 18
Vikings 27 11 16 22 18 19
Cowboys 22 25 25 16 24 20
Packers 31 16 26 27 25 21
Cardinals 14 24 21 23 22 22
Rams 21 14 20 30 21 23
Steelers 32 19 28 28 23 24
Panthers 9 26 23 17 26 25
Giants 6 28 22 13 27 26
Seahawks 24 18 24 29 19 27
Texans 13 32 30 7 32 28
Eagles 16 30 29 25 29 29
Jaguars 23 27 27 20 28 30
Colts 29 29 32 15 30 31
Redskins 28 31 31 32 31 32

A couple things here:

  • There is definitely some merit to saying the Colts have played an easy schedule, because they clearly have.  The defense has faced the 3rd easiest schedule.  But look who has had an easier defensive schedule?  Week 9 opponent Houston, who has played the easiest defensive schedule in the league.  I think they'll finally be tested this week.
  • Who is playing the 1st place schedule in the AFC North?  The Browns, Ravens, and Bengals are in the top 5 of SoS, while the Steelers are 24th. 

I'm going to be working on 2 more improvements that should be done before the end of the season:

  1. Future Strength of Schedule.  Should be done for next week.
  2. Weighted Rankings.  This means that more recent games will count more than older games, as it tells a better story of how the team is playing now, rather than (possibly) 3 months ago.  Give me a couple weeks on this to set it all up, but I think it's necessary for the best rankings.

Comment 20 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don't like SRS because it hates on the Hawkeyes

/irrational

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Nov 5, 2009 3:30 PM EST reply actions  

I think it is very accurate

Having watched them a couple times this year, I think they (Iowa) are only a couple plays better than ND. Which is exactly how they are ranked in SRS.

And ND is at best 15th in the country, but probably not that high.

by mgrex03 on Nov 5, 2009 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Iowa is a hard team to peg because they are ridiculously inconsistent, especially on offense

How do you project a team that can throw 5 picks and score just 7 points on offense through 3 quarters, then put up 28 in the 4th quarter with no TOs? Any Iowa game can turn on a dime, for better or worse.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

by shake n bake on Nov 5, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I really do think Iowa and ND are 2-3 plays different

2 “Blowouts”, a whole slew of close games. Differences are:

ND lost to Michigan with 11 seconds left, and Iowa blocked the FG that would have beaten them.

ND had 3 shots inside the 5 yard line to tie/potentially beat USC, but missed. Iowa got the TD against MSU.

Literally 2 or 3 plays different.

by mgrex03 on Nov 5, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Great post

Rec’d!

I also wish I had time and motivation to blog at Speed Blue Nation

by Bullard47 on Nov 5, 2009 3:34 PM EST reply actions  

Great New Stat Toy !

I like this work – it certainly is food for thought.

Mike

by Sandsaver01 on Nov 5, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions  

This tells me

The Redskins really do suck. The weakest strength of schedule and they suck.

As long as we have Peyton we will always have a chance to win.

by skywalker on Nov 5, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions  

almost every bottom-feeder team in the league had their first win against the Redskins

except titans that dont have them in their schedule and the Bucs that lost their only chance of avoiding 0-16

by thebossuzzi on Nov 5, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Great analysis, as always

But this definitely scares my socks off. We knew we would hit a harder stretch of games starting with this weekend, and this illustrates the difference. I don’t want our team to be below #1 in anything (except maybe interceptions thrown or losses incurred…).

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Nov 5, 2009 3:41 PM EST reply actions  

100% agreed

as usual.
great work
but oh shit, now I am concerned.
thanks a freakin’ lot. (Ignorance was bliss)

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Nov 6, 2009 4:18 AM EST up reply actions  

awesome work

I’d give you multiple rec’s if I could

"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."

by psvirsky on Nov 5, 2009 3:43 PM EST reply actions  

To: mgrex03

i love your stats, listen im a web developer and programmer , maybe in the off-season we could develop a website with all your stats formulas with some advance animated charts and visualizations to make them look real good. a nice user interface and some widgets for bloggers. what you think?

by thebossuzzi on Nov 5, 2009 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

Shoot me an email

You can find it at the bottom of the page. We can talk about it offline.

by mgrex03 on Nov 5, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Our up-coming schedule is brutal.

I hope we pound the Texans on Sunday, so I can relax a little……

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
"As I grow older, the list of people who can kiss my ass grows longer"-Ancient Hoosier Proverb.

by Indy Lori on Nov 5, 2009 5:43 PM EST reply actions  

LOL, I stand corrected.

You’re right, What was I thinking?

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
"As I grow older, the list of people who can kiss my ass grows longer"-Ancient Hoosier Proverb.

by Indy Lori on Nov 5, 2009 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Appreciate your efforts at putting this together

Thanks. Interesting look at the season so far.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Nov 5, 2009 8:27 PM EST reply actions  

I am impressed

This has to be one of the most comprehensive team analysis post I have ever seen. Very good work and frankly it could be a basis for an entire web site of it’s own. I know I would visit frequently. Especially when the future data is incorporated. Excellent work.

" My enemy said "Love your enemy". I obeyed and loved myself." Gibran

by JUNGLEJOHN on Nov 6, 2009 8:21 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake