Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

I don't get it...

I know we don't value LB's much and I would like to have Freddy back, but it's not devastating. But that do they see in Buster Davis? He was AWFUL replacing Brackett and didn't Hagler have to come in at one point because Davis was so bad?

http://www.indystar.com/article/20090227/SPORTS03/902270420

The Colts also announced they offered exclusive-rights contracts to Davis.

Five more words need, yes!

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.

0 recs  |  Comment 46 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This is actually good news. Now the Colts are basically forced to go LB heavy in the draft, which they needed to anyway, but if they had kept Keiaho, I highly doubt they would have.

I’m hoping they draft at least 2 LBs and a couple OL as well. Screw WR, we don’t need one.

This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.

by KingRichard on Feb 27, 2009 11:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

maybe we don't need a WR...

but it appears there will be some quality ones available at the end of the 1st. looks like a lot of wayne and gonzo on the outside and clark in the slot, with santi blocking. hoping we pick up a cheap, effective 3rd WR because Roy Hall just cant stay healthy and Pierre is the great unknown.

by Matic on Feb 27, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pierre is the great unknown.

Everything about this statement is just hilarious. How is Pierre Garcon any different than some dude they draft this season? They’d both be in the same exact position, except Garcon has actually been on the team for a year and is familiar with the offense. So what exactly is the advantage of drafting yet another WR again?

This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.

by KingRichard on Feb 27, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+ 1000000

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Feb 27, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Im not sold on the Colts drafting any OL players early in the draft, if at all. I would have felt more comfortable if the Colts would have kept either Keiaho or Hagler for depth purposes, along with another LB or two in the draft. I’ve said this in the past, even though I do not think the Colts need to draft another WR, I still wouldn’t mind them getting one between rounds 1-3 depending whose left on the board and if that WR is the best available player for the Colts at that time.

by ColtsFanNChiTown on Feb 27, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

point taken on NFL experience...

but there is a reason pierre was a 6th round pick (yes, i know, small school). someone at the end of the first will most likely come from a bigger school, with more big game experience. that’s all i am saying. i am not going to be unhappy with an LB’r in the first round, just playing devil’s advocated. ahh…the hilarity! and what do we say here “IN POLIAN WE TRUST!”

by Matic on Feb 27, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The only thing that a big school means

Is that they got to beat up on poor schools for the majority of their games. Big schools pay crap schools money so that they have an incentive to play, and get crushed, by big schools. Big schools mean nothing other than the guy was good in highschool, played since he was a freshman in highschool, and either was recruited when he was in middle school or happened to end up in a highschool district in a good division.

Just look at Ohio State vs Florida in 2006. Ohio State and Michigan were going at it and were #1 and #2 (I believe, I know OSU was 1) and both got STOMPED when they played other schools.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.

by monstersbox on Feb 27, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Exclusive Rights means they can offer him a league minimum deal

and he has to take it or hold out.

Keiaho was an RFA, they would have had to offer him at least 927K, as opposed to 385K for Bustah.

I ain't tryin' do you, I'm just tryin' do me
Last album did two, I'm just tryin' do three.
-Young Jeezy "I Luv It

by shake n bake on Feb 27, 2009 11:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

And I'm sure if he tries to hold out

Polian will sarcastically say, “Oh no! Buster Davis won’t be playing for us! What will we do? His stellar defense helped us in that Thursday night Jacksonville game! Sign it, now.” Or something along those lines.

by Colts Homer on Feb 27, 2009 12:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Btw, Buster Davis has promise and is mainly staying for depth. He was in the right position most of the time last season, he just wiffed on way too many tackles. I’m totally fine with keeping him for depth.

This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.

by KingRichard on Feb 27, 2009 11:41 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

im totally fine thinking that the colts will pick a LB early in the draft

by Piojocuau on Feb 27, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hagler is out, too.

Link

Not sure if you guys knew that. Can’t read through all of the comments in all of the posts right now.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 27, 2009 2:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

So,

assuming that we don’t draft/start a rookie LB, one of: Wheeler, Senn, Davis will be a starter at LB next year…

I really don’t see how Polian thinks any one of those three would be a better starter than Keiaho…

by hahasound on Feb 27, 2009 3:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Don't count out Okwo

Seriously, I think Okwo has a strong chance to start.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.

by monstersbox on Feb 27, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent point.

I had forgotten about that acquisition. I like it.

by coltsfanawalt on Feb 27, 2009 6:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

OK so we should look right over WR and DT because the linebackers need more atention

WTF. I swear half the people on this site are bipolar.

Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......

by colts9318rock on Feb 27, 2009 4:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wide Receivers and O-linemen in the later rounds. Linebackers and Defensive Tackles in the early rounds. Or BPA as Polian does in.

Please, please draft a big Defensive Tackle. Please?

by skywalker on Feb 27, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Marvin Harrison was a first round pick

I believe we should go WR then DT in the second. What ever its not my call I will be happy with what ever we get.

Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......

by colts9318rock on Feb 27, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You know, in order to spend a second round pick on a DT, there actually has to be a DT available that is worth the pick. You don’t just pick guys to pick them, which is why it’s not a good idea to pick any DT in the second, unless his name is Ron Brace.

I think you need to refer to my above statement about selectin a WR.

This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.

by KingRichard on Feb 27, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lol, ok

Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......

by colts9318rock on Feb 27, 2009 5:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I for one, am not bipolar

I’ve said since the beginning of the draft talk that we needed a LB. However, most of the draft talk drifted away from that because at the time, it was assumed that Curry, Maulauga, and Laurinaitis would all be picked well before our pick and then there was a severe dropoff after them. There’s also a specific type of LB for our system that requires a certain skillset. Mainly the ability to cover, react, the ability to intercept, the ability to read routes, and stop the run or blitz. In that order. Most LBs don’t fit that system. The ones that had that as their forte were Laurinaitis and Curry. However, with the results of the combine and the lower than expected performance of Laurinaitis, and the extremely impressive performance of LBs that are scouted as fitting the type of LB we’re looking for (see Jason Phillips), and the depth that was discovered at DT and WR, it made more options available. If you look up any Colts mock draft, or my wishlist to be more accurate, I list Laurinaitis in every single one of them. I also say there are certain people that would have to be off the board for it to make sense, but if those people were, I stated that I would not only be content, but I would be elated to have chosen him.

You also seem to be seriously underestimate the impact of linebackers. You may say that we’re a T2 and the LB isn’t as important as other positions, but I disagree. In fact, an elite LB in a T2 is not only useful, but right up there in terms of importance when it comes to safeties. In a T2, the LBs and the Safeties are the ones with multiple responsibilities. With the design of the system, it’s based on reaction. Your DEs have one job, disrupt the QB. Your CBs have one job, contain their zones and react to balls thrown their way. The DTs have one job, occupy space and attempt to penetrate to free up the DEs to get to the QB and allow for the LBs to react if it’s a run. The LBs and Safeties play both safety and the run. They’re the ones that have to have the ability to cover, the ability to tackle, and the ability to anticipate or react within tiny windows to the play. The LBs in a T2 are one of THE most important positions in stopping the run. Yes, the DTs must be able to hold and penetrate, but even if they do, the ability to stop the run will be nonexistent if you don’t have the LBs that can take advantage of that. You could have an elite DT and still have a crap run game. However, you could have an average DT and if you have an elite LB, you could have a great run defense. In a T2 or cover 2 defense, if your LBs are below average (us) or bad, the DTs not only have to be responsible for stopping the run, demanding constant double teams, but they also have to put pressure on the QB. Not many DTs in the league have the talent to do that.

And I’d like to finish by saying that a reach at any of the positions, be it DT, LB, RB, WR etc.. would be stupid. But skipping over a LB and going for a WR or a DT when the LB is clearly a top prospect and fits our system and a player in the next round wouldn’t be nearly as good is beyond stupid. Especially when there is a significant need at that position. And there is, unless you like the sounds of Wheeler, Brackett, Session, and not much depth or experience behind them if one of them gets hurt.

Is it your opinion that Peyton Manning can’t throw to anyone but first round wide receivers? Because that’s what he has been doing for quite awhile since Reggie and Dallas joined Marvin. Reggie is a 1st rounder, Gonzalez is a 1st rounder, Dallas is a first rounder, Addai is a first rounder, Marvin was a first rounder. To think that Peyton NEEDS a first round wide receiver to be successful, after proving that he could make the likes of Fletcher and Utecht look good when given the opportunity, is lacking a little faith in his abilities. On the flipside, name the last LB we’ve taken above the third round. I’ll help you out, Rob Morris in 2000.

Now name the most dominant T2s in recent memory. Bears and Bucs, correct? Name the best players on their defense. If the names Brooks and Urlacher aren’t one of the first ones that jump to mind, I don’t know where you’ve been. Is it a coincidence that they’re dominant? I seriously don’t think so.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.

by monstersbox on Feb 27, 2009 6:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right On...

Good post. I agree that LB is a position that has been in need of an upgrade for several years now. I was impressed with Keiaho the first couple games he played in a few years ago because he was able to tackle on goal line situations, but over time it became obvious that he lacks the skill set needed to be a quality player in this system. The Chargers playoff game was an obvious example of that, as he whiffed at numerous tackles….overpursuing on many plays and his inability to cover in the open field has been well documented. And if Buster Davis is worth keeping simply to provide depth at a low price, why wasn’t Rob Morris retained last year?? He could sign for close to league minimum and he was very familiar with the system and knows how to tackle.

IMO, a quality 1st round LB would fit the greatest need for this defense. Although DT is very important, Polian could grab a quality guy in the 2nd or 3rd that wouldn’t be rated much lower than any 1st rounder available by the time the Colts pick.

I can’t think of a good defensive team in the NFL that doesn’t have a notable LB. Most of the best defenses have big, physical and smart LBs. The Colts have one smart LB (Brackett) and one on his way to becoming physical (Session). I don’t know enough about Wheeler to offer an opinion, but if they didn’t think he was good enough to start last year over Davis, it’s probably safe to say LB should be a top priority.

All that said, I agree with every offseason move that the team has made to date this year. The only thing I hope for is to somehow work a deal to bring back Rhodes. His intensity grabs my attention every time he is on the field…I only wish Addai was watching too.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 28, 2009 4:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not saying the Colts shouldn’t focus on a LB, but it would also be tough to avoid a couple other positions with the first pick too….it just depends whose left on the board and I believe thats the thinking with the majority of Colts fans here. I have said this a few times, but I was (am?) hoping the Colts would retain either Keiaho or Hagler for depth purposes and their experience. Keiaho was out of position in the playoff game against the Chargers, so specifically pointing him out there is probably a little inaccurate of his overall performace last year. He didnt show any progress nor flashes of greatness, but still is a reliable LB for the team in my opinion.

by ColtsFanNChiTown on Feb 28, 2009 10:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly, Finding two average line backers for depth does not make sense when

we have two average line backers. They could be back. I dont see a team picking up Hagler any time soon. Keiaho might catch on in Tampa or any other Tampa 2 system. Its funny June, Morris, and Gardner are all free agents. I would love to have June back for a low price.

Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......

by colts9318rock on Mar 1, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You want June back? Why does that not surprise me.

This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.

by KingRichard on Mar 1, 2009 10:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

for a low price. Which he's not going to take.

What the hell is wrong with June. Your pissed at Keiaho because he can not cover. June is a cover linebacker that has tackling issues. What do you want? A solid line backer that can cover and tackle for a low price. What kind of fantisy world are you living in?

Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......

by colts9318rock on Mar 1, 2009 10:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What the hell is wrong with June.

Gee, let me think…oh right, he sucks.

Your pissed at Keiaho because he can not cover. June is a cover linebacker that has tackling issues.

Yeah that makes total sense. Lets get rid of a guy with a glaring weakness, only to pick up another guy who the Colts previously got rid of, with a glaring weakness that is even worse than Keiaho’s. Brilliant!

Clearly if you paid attention to the Colts defense, their weakness wasn’t against the pass, but it sure would be nice to upgrade that position with someone who can excel in both phases.

A solid line backer that can cover and tackle for a low price. What kind of fantisy world are you living in?

Apparently you’ve never heard of the draft.

This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.

by KingRichard on Mar 1, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

not going there, have a great day

Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......

by colts9318rock on Mar 1, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So, Who is the next Ray Lewis in this draft? When do we take him. Other problems must be adressed

 That probaly makes this LB of yours a late round pick unless you think LB problem must be adressed first. OK, so Roy Hall is our new slot reciever and we are ok at the DT position. Not saying we are not taking a DT or WR in the draft. But they will not probaly start in their rookie years. Who in the late rounds is a great takler and cover LB who is ready to step up and start their rookie year? Please let me see your ideas on who is going to play in the LB position for the Colts next year. I hate predicting the draft because NOBODY IS RIGHT. Polian even said he will take the best player in the first round of the draft. He could be a QB. That throws both our plans out.

Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......

by colts9318rock on Mar 1, 2009 1:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

At the moment

At this point in time, our LB situation has absolutely no depth, but is also the weakest position on the team. If I compared them to our DT position, I’d actually say relatively speaking I’d feel confident in our DTs. Our best LB, Brackett, is coming off a severe foot injury. Our second best, Keiaho, is a free agent. Our third best, well he may be second but Session has potential but hasn’t reached the point where I’m completely sold. Then we have 2nd year players and Okwo.

Marvin has essentially be off the team for almost 2 years and we managed. Could we upgrade? Sure, you can always upgrade, but I don’t think it’s a need.

Who’s the next Ray Lewis? That’s the same as asking who the next Marvin Harrison or Peyton Manning is. Nobody predicts those guys in the draft, even if they’re sold as them being a great NFL player. I mean at the moment, there is no Rey Lewis, but there is a guy that could be as good or better than him in Aaron Curry. Or he could be a complete flop.

You asked who would start at LB from the draft this year. Well who’s going to start on our own team this year?

I could put out a couple guys that could probably start in their first year and aren’t a first round pick. Jasper Brinkley played MIKE in a T2, and he could be a late round pick. I really like taking Jason Phillips in the 2nd round, he played in a 4-2-5 (zone similar to what the Colts were doing at the end of the year) and I’d feel better with him on the field next year over Senn or Wheeler. And Gerald McRath has the athletic ability to play a few positions. Not to mention, Phillips and McRath are quite a bit faster than our current LBs and Brinkley is pretty much the same speed but significantly bigger.

Either way, I’d take any of them over June. Unless we went to a 4-2-5 setup and used June as the safety/LB. Which we could probably do too, but he’ll be more expensive.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.

by monstersbox on Mar 2, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I still would have preferred keeping either Keiaho or Hagler and still draft a LB between rounds 1-3 to soldify the depth and talent.

by ColtsFanNChiTown on Mar 1, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

June

I think bringing back June would be a bad move considering his price tag and weaknesses in tackling and run defense. June would probably have more of an impact on a team looking for a big safety. Of course since Sanders only plays a handfull of games a year, a bigger safety with coverage skills wouldn’t be a bad thing but they don’t have the cap room for it.

All I am suggesting is a more well rounded player with decent pass coverage skills and an emphasis on run defense and improved tackling (and bonus points for size). Not just one or the other. I think the early rounds of the draft is the best place to find a guy like that. I’m not asking for Ray Lewis, just asking for an upgrade.

by AceOfSpades on Mar 1, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

GOD!

Why do some of you just totally ignore RB?!?! Do you not realize Joseph Addai was the worst starting RB in the league last year and that the guy can’t stay healthy? WR is stupid to draft. They take 3 years to groom and train in our offense. DT’s will go too early and Polian knows this. Its all about RB, OL, LB.

by MasterRWayne on Feb 27, 2009 6:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Power Running Back!

I believe KR is hot on Rashad Jennings…I looked him up, not bad. Not bad at all!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 27, 2009 6:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And who do we...

And who do we have at RB? Addai is not the same; Hart has a busted knee and Ball is an unknown. RB is perfect to draft because its a deep year for RB’s and they can contribute right away.

by MasterRWayne on Feb 27, 2009 6:37 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You post this alot. And strongly.

But I disagree. I think any running back suffers behind a bad offensive line. And then there are systems like Denver, that could make Al Davis into a 1,000 yard rusher with their line and scheme.

We had serious line issues last season. It was somewhat masked in the passing game by Peyton’s decisiveness and quick release, but he even commented on being too rushed last season. Fix the line, and I think Addai will be fine. Obviously the Colts thought something of Lance Ball to tender him in a tight salary cap year while letting guys like Freddie go with no offer. So that intrigues me. Also, once he fully recovers, I am very excited about Mike Hart.

We will see what Polian does in the draft, though. If he agrres with you, we will know it then. And his opinion trumps both of ours. I am very curious how we will draft in the first two rounds this year.

by coltsfanawalt on Feb 27, 2009 6:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have a feeling

With the decision to let Keiaho go along with the hiring of Coyer, there will definitely be an emphasis placed on LB. Your coordinators are the ones that instigate and influence personnel decisions moreso than anyone on the team. It’s the coordinators that go to bat for players or fight for input as to who is drafted. The HC sees the team as a whole and has more things than evaluating and scouting players on his plate. The coordinators go to the HC to give their input on whether or not what a certain guy is doing is worth keeping, worth teaching, or worth letting go. They’re the evaluators of what they want for their side of the ball. The position coaches give the summary and analysis of how players are performing, the coordinators put that together and see where the strengths and weaknesses fit their overall fit, the coordinators go to the HC and give them their findings. The GM takes this all into consideration, collects everyone together, and they argue their case. Coyer was a LB coach when he first arrived in Denver. When Coyer became the DC in Denver, they drafted Terry Pierce (a LB) in the 2nd round in 2003. Denver then drafted D.J. Williams in the first round in 2004. The voices, and ability to bring people around to their line of thinking are how teams (good teams) build their team.

The idea to take a WR, RB, so on and so forth is what Al Davis and Jerry Jones have been doing for years. How has that panned out for them? A good GM knows his HC is the voice for the coordinators, and the coordinators are the best evaluators of what will work in their system and what won’t. They’re the ones that deal with these guys everyday and have been doing their jobs for years. They’re the soldiers and the GM is the General. It’s up to the General to make the final decision, but without the soldiers and the soldiers input, you end up with a catastrophe.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.

by monstersbox on Feb 27, 2009 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Same argument

Different day. Nobody is arguing with you that we need to address the RB situation, even if only for depth purposes. However, even Richard (the guy that fantasizes he was a RB and does the “Heisman” pose in front of his mirror every morning when he wakes up) realizes that reaching for a player when there are other needs isn’t where you want to be.

I’ll counter your who do we have at RB with who do we have at DT, and who do we have at LB? We don’t have guys that missed time and had production decreases due to injury, not to mention the other RB who had performed well in the same system with a significantly better line, losing production. We have guys that were healthy, and just plain couldn’t do their jobs to the level that we needed it to be. Yes, our offense struggled, but a team should not be completely 100% reliant on their offense. If a defense can’t get off the field and allows opposing teams to take away opportunities from an offense that can’t stay on the field, you end up with crap. Which is what was happening.

So what, according to you, would you do if Moreno, Wells, McCoy were off the board and Peria Jerry, Laurinaitis, Evander Hood were there? Are you saying we should pull someone that stands a strong chance of being there or multiple people with their skillsets, ability, and athleticism would be available in the 2nd to be our 1st round pick?

Here’s a scenario. Say Moreno, Jerry, Laurinaitis, are all there at 27. I wouldn’t even think twice when I chose Jerry. I wouldn’t think twice if Jerry was gone and took Moreno over Laurinaitis. However, if there was a tackle of their caliber at 27, I’d take him over Moreno without a second thought.

BPA while addressing a need. Otherwise you’re saying the only problem with our team is at RB, at that’s seriously misguided. The Super Bowls will not be engraved during training camp if we draft Shonn Greene or Donald Brown in the first round.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.

by monstersbox on Feb 27, 2009 6:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly, and this may shock you, I’d take Laurinaitis, in half of a heartbeat. Moreno is a great running back, but I think there are some other RBs that could be just as good if not better than him in the later rounds.

I’m of the mindset that the OL last year was abysmal. It is true that any Joe Schmoe running back could become a 1k yard back with a phenominal line, but I can’t give Addai and slack due to the fact that he started his decline over year prior to the 2008 season. We’ve discussed this ad nauseam so I’m going to spare everyone the rant here but, 2009 is do or addai (u sea wut eye did thar?). Either put up or shut up. Time to walk the walk. (insert annoyingly cliche statement here) If he has another disappointing season, I’ll be calling for his head, and would not be completely surprised if he is released. That is assuming they keep him the starter next season and all that jazz. However given their lack of depth, I forsee them either drafting another running back or doing their annual cherry picking of UDFAs.

This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.

by KingRichard on Feb 27, 2009 7:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that Addai has got to have a great season

But in terms of his performance when NOT asked to run behind an awful line (and let’s put blame where blame is due, the run blocking was the worst), he wasn’t too bad. That guy can throw some bone-shattering blocks; he was stoning DEs in pass-pro all year. “So what?” you say, but that’s not something to be taken for granted. One of the reasons they drafted Addai was his ability to pass-protect, and he’s GREAT at that. The O-line issues not only killed his rushing but forced him to stay in to protect, which killed his recieving too. I believe in Addai, and I think if you fix the O-Line you fix Addai (although yes, there were some holes that he could’ve hit a little harder). My main point is that RB should be the least of our concerns, right there with QB, TE, and DE.

by slash196 on Feb 28, 2009 1:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Addai has one bad, injury hit season behind an awful line and suddenly he’s done?

Not buying it.

by eltharion_doa on Feb 28, 2009 8:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Addai

Wasn’t there buzz that he got a new agent mid year? It seems like some were speculating that there was a reason that he would need one soon. I hoped not.

One thing I will agree with that King Richard just said. This is the year (for Addai to show it). The Colts line will improve from the mess of last year. We have Saturday back. If Lilja returns to form from his injury, we will be excellent. Even if not, we have three very promising second year players.

How many times has Dungy or Polian stated that most positions make their greatest leap in improvement between their first and second season? I think that we will see great improvement from Pollack and Richard particularly, as well as Justice. Add to this that they will finally get a full offseason with Manning.

With that improvement likely, Addai will need to return to early form. If not, the natives will become very restless. I expect that he will be fine and will perform much better along with the line. But he will have to, and we will see.

Oh, and I am still a big Mike Hart fan.

by coltsfanawalt on Feb 27, 2009 10:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Running Backs

I agree that the O line really hurt our RBs chances to make anything happen in the this year. But for Manning to excel the Colts need to make sure the running game will not hurt us again. Addai can play if hes healthy, but i think at his age Rhodes is a very average player. I think the Colts should draft someone like Donald Brown or Rashad Jennings after they make their choice in the 1st to be sure we have two good running backs.

by ColtsPurdueFanFromKY on Feb 28, 2009 7:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bob_sanders4_small
Jerraud Powers: Old Man
Bilde_small
Sebastian Vollmer had help on Freeney 36 out of 44 passing attempts
Bruce-treetops1_small
Ask Baltimore Beatdown: Questions for the Ravens Blogger
Nnamdi_small
Why The Colts Really Won and the State of the Rivalry
Small
Manning to Wayne Touchdown, Tecmo Super Bowl Style

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help I can't play videos from colts.com
Belicheat_small
College Football- Open Thread
Small
College Open Thread #2
Img_1672_small
Matt Stover!
Peyton-manning_small
More bad journalism (read at your own risk)
N17901640_32485246_6102070_small
Gonzo update
Small
Gary Brackett
Peyton_framed1_painting_small
Cool Video on Sunday's Game
Small
Question: What is Deion Sanders issue with Peyton & the Colts?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Stampede Blue
Winning Stats Power Rankings: Week 11
Big Cat Country
Shallow Thoughts and Aimless Musings
Battle Red Blog
Steve Slaton To Start On Monday Night

Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editor

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Contributing Writers

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Seyton_manning_feature_small KingRichard

Change_small Colts Homer