Marv vs T.O.
Big Blue Shoe's post on why did Terrell Owens sign faster than Marvin Harrison, started some arguments. The main two were variations of Marvin vs TO, which is better right now? and which has been better for their careers. The first is a prediction about the future so will be much more subjective. I'll focus on the one that is based on events that have already happened and been throughly recorded.
Both receivers entered the league the same year and have only a single games difference in games played, making totals (for once) a perfectly a appropriate way to compare players.
| Player | Rec | Targets | Catch% | Yards | TDs | DYAR | DVOA |
| Marvin | 1,102 | 1,700 | 64.8% | 14,580 | 128 | 3,606 | 13.2% |
| T.O. | 951 | 1,616 | 58.8% | 14,122 | 139 | 3,344 | 13.5% |
Marvin has been considerably more productive in total than Owens, with T.O. edges coming in TDs and a slight edge in per play value (which leaned the other way before the last two seasons). The biggest difference by far has been Marvin's hands vs T.O.'s. An extra 6% in catch% builds a 84 target difference into a 151 catch, 458 yard gap. Owens has played in only one less game than Marvin (and 9 of T.O.'s 19 games missed were by suspention) giving Owens a very similar number of oppertunities to get open and have the ball thrown to him.
Here it is year by year
| Year | Player | Rec | Targets | Catch% | Yards | TDs | DYAR | DVOA | YPR | YPT |
| 1996 | Harrison | 64 | 118 | 54% | 836 | 8 | 151 | 4.3% | 13.1 | 7.08 |
|
Owens |
35 | 57 | 61% | 520 | 4 | 107 | 12.7% | 14.9 | 9.12 | |
| 1997 | Harrison | 73 | 119 | 62% | 866 | 6 | 231 | 11.8% | 11.9 | 7.28 |
| Owens | 60 | 103 | 58% | 936 | 8 | 245 | 18.9% | 15.6 | 9.08 | |
| 1998 | Harrison | 59 | 122 | 48% | 776 | 7 | 88 | -3.4% | 13.2 | 6.36 |
| Owens | 67 | 104 | 64% | 1,098 | 14 | 392 | 36.7% | 16.4 | 10.6 | |
| Year | Player | Rec | Targets | Catch% | Yards | TDs | DYAR | DVOA | YPR | YPT |
| 1999 | Harrison | 115 | 193 | 60% | 1,663 | 12 | 350 | 10.0% | 14.5 | 8.62 |
| Owens | 60 | 98 | 61% | 754 | 4 | 82 | -2.0% | 12.6 | 7.69 | |
| 2000 | Harrison | 102 | 169 | 60% | 1,413 | 14 | 340 | 12.4% | 13.9 | 8.36 |
| Owens | 97 | 145 | 67% | 1,451 | 13 | 419 | 24.3% | 15.0 | 10.0 | |
| 2001 | Harrison | 109 | 164 | 66% | 1,524 | 15 | 537 | 28.5% | 14.0 | 9.29 |
| Owens | 93 | 154 | 60% | 1,412 | 16 | 458 | 20.5% | 15.2 | 9.17 | |
| Year | Player | Rec | Targets | Catch% | Yards | TDs | DYAR | DVOA | YPR | YPT |
| 2002 | Harrison | 143 | 205 | 70% | 1,722 | 11 | 478 | 16.8% | 12.0 | 8.4 |
| Owens | 100 | 159 | 63% | 1,300 | 13 | 246 | 7.1% | 13.0 | 8.18 | |
| 2003 | Harrison | 94 | 142 | 66% | 1,272 | 10 | 300 | 13.5% | 13.5 | 8.96 |
| Owens | 80 | 145 | 55% | 1,102 | 9 | 138 | -0.7% | 13.8 | 7.60 | |
| 2004 | Harrison | 86 | 139 | 62% | 1,113 | 15 | 299 | 13.9% | 12.9 | 8.01 |
| Owens | 77 | 127 | 61% | 1,200 | 14 | 326 | 19.6% | 15.6 | 9.44 | |
| Year | Player | Rec | Targets | Catch% | Yards | TDs | DYAR | DVOA | YPR | YPT |
| 2005 | Harrison | 82 | 132 | 62% | 1,146 | 12 | 251 | 11.2% | 14.0 | 8.68 |
| Owens | 47 | 92 | 51% | 763 | 6 | 133 | 6.0% | 16.2 | 8.29 | |
| 2006 | Harrison | 95 | 148 | 64% | 1,366 | 12 | 510 | 30.3% | 14.4 | 9.23 |
| Owens | 85 | 152 | 56% | 1,180 | 13 | 274 | 10.2% | 13.9 | 7.76 | |
| 2007 | Harrison | 20 | 32 | 63% | 247 | 1 | 40 | 2.3% | 12.4 | 7.72 |
| Owens | 81 | 141 | 57% | 1,355 | 15 | 449 | 28.2% | 16.7 | 9.60 | |
| 2008 | Harrison | 60 | 107 | 56% | 636 | 5 | 31 | -9.6% | 10.6 | 5.94 |
| Owens | 69 | 139 | 50% | 1,052 | 10 | 75 | -5.7% | 15.2 | 7.57 |
Fun Facts
- In Marvin Harrison's record setting 143 catch season, he caught a career high 70% of the passes thrown to him. That record is less like Larry Johnson's carries record (where he just kept getting attempts despite inefficiency) and more like Dickerson's yardage record (where a great player was extremely efficient over a massive workload).
- Owens had a higher catch % 4 of the pairs first 5 years in the league. Over the following 8 season Marvin had a higher catch% every year.
- Marvin has 3 seasons with more DYAR than Owen's career high.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Harrison has had a better and more consistent career than Owens, but Owens statistically will be known behind Harrison and then Moss as one of the best at the WR position in his generation. What was up with Harrisons catch % during Mannings rookie year…I think they were getting all those flaws out right away in course to the best combo ever.
by ColtsFanNChiTown on Mar 12, 2009 10:01 PM EDT reply actions
No question Harrison’s the better player over their respective careers.
But over the past two season – even accounting for Harrison’s injury – Owens still looks like the better receiver, at least on raw stats although of course they aren’t the be all and end all of the NFL.
If I had to pay $6.5m to someone, it’d be Owens.
The career long argument is probably being skewed a bit too far due to Marvin’s injury last year. When you look at their careers, Marvin has been more consistent and the only thing TO really has on him is the big playmaking ability. Even so, their stats overall are pretty similar. What makes Marvin far and away the better WR is that he got kicked off of no teams. TO’s been run out of 3 different cities and even suspended for half a season after helping a team get to the super bowl.
Some off the field stuff shouldn’t be factored in to a player’s on the field legacy, but I don’t think that’s the case with TO. All the crap he’s pulled really affected how his teams performed. There’s just no way around it.
I think Owens is considered more of a big-play highlight-reel receiver than Marvin, partly because of the national media attention that he gets. The feeling I get is that Marvin is considered a possession receiver who cannot stretch the field quit like Owens can. Owens’ ability to produce with three different teams erases questions that Marvin faces, most notably “Is he a product of the system?” and “Did playing with Peyton just make him look good?”. No questions on my part—Marvin’s awesome. But I can see where that line of questioning might be turning some GM’s off.
by FOs numbers
TO did from 1996-1998 and in 2001
and Garcia, McNabb and Romo were all far better than 96/97 Harbaugh and rookie Peyton.
So actually the 3 years where TO was getting passes from a still productive All time great QB while Marvin was getting very mediocre QB play probably cancels out a lot of the time where Marvin was getting passes from a All time great QB while TO was stuck with “just” a Pro Bowl caliber QB.
They ball when they can and I'm ballin' by nature
Addicted to the game like Jordan and Peyton
-Lil Wayne "Fireman"
by shake n bake on Mar 14, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






























