Eeny, meeny, miny, moe
I pray that this is not the formula Polian uses to select which free agents to re-sign, and which to let go. I'm sure it isn't, but you never know.
via photos.upi.com |
There are still a few key unrestricted free agents that the Colts have yet to make moves on in terms of re-signing or letting them hit the bricks. We are all aware of the Marvin Harrison issue. To this day I still think he is making a huge mistake. Opting for more money over winning another championship with the team that gave him a chance to make a name for yourself just doesn't sit well with me. And let's not forget, he'd have the best quarterback in the history of football throwing touchdowns to him too. I still don't understand his logic behind this. Anywhere he goes, he will not be the #1 receiver. He'll have to basically fill the role of a possession receiver at best. He will have to re-learn a completely new system, one that will be more stock in structure and that will probably hinder his production. There's no question that the amazing stats he put up while he was a Colt was a combination of his skills, Peyton's amazing arm and brain, and their chemistry as far as their playing calling and offensive style. But what do I know, I'm just a fan who blogs. I'm not ruling out the possibility of him returning. In fact, I was the first person to say that he'll either return to play for the Colts or just retire. If I was Polian, and he was wanting to return to the Colts, I'd sign him in a heartbeat. I say that for a few reasons:
1) He knows the system like the back of his hand.
2) He has a ton of experience and would be infinitely more productive than the other receivers on the roster.
3) The Polian wouldn't think twice about wasting another first round pick on a receiver.
Nevertheless, I don't see it happening so let's just move one.
There are currently 7 other UFAs still left on the board that the Colts could potentially re-sign. The possibility of the Colts re-signing them all is slim and none, and for good reason. Out of those 7, there are only two of which I think are worth spending the cash on to help the team. Considering the Colts have basically told Keiaho, Hagler, Hunter Smith, and Josh Thomas to pack their bags and get a-steppin, that leaves us with Keiwan Ratliff, Matt Giordano, and Dominic Rhodes. Can you guess which two I'm going to pick? Follow me over to the next page and find out.
And this is where the title of this article comes into play. Eeny, meeny, miny, moe. Which little tiger do we let go?
via www.mycolts.net |
The first player I think the Colts should seriously look to re-sign is Keiwan Ratliff. He started off the season pretty shaky, trying to get comfortable in the defense. Basically trying not to screw up too bad as opposed to trying to do too much and making everyone's life a living hell. And indeed, towards the middle of the season and through the end, I thought he came into his own and became an above average nickelback. He had a couple key interceptions in big games for the Colts, and gained much valuable game experience due to Marlin Jackson's ACL injury. Thus, bringing my to my second point. Marlin Jackson isn't going to come jump, hop, and skipping back like he never blew his knee out last season. For that reason, the Colts are going to need the depth at corner. Toss in the fact that I saw enough of Tim Jennings to last me a lifetime, I'm kind begging that the Colts re-sign him. If the Colts decide not to re-sign Ratliff, despite the reasons I laid out, I'd expect them (and even if they do re-sign Ratliff to follow this route) to draft a corner this season. Who might you ask? I don't know, ask Colts Homer.
The other UFA I think the Colts should keep is Matt Giordano. Giordano is a pretty good special teams player. Granted, the special teams have been pretty atrocious these last few years, but I don't think Giordano was part of the problem. He's shown a time or two he can adequately fill in for Sanders or Bethea at safety if need be. He has some insane speed for a white guy too. I remember when Hester ran back the opening kickoff in the Super Bowl, Giordano had to run across the field just to catch up to him, and he almost did by the time Hester got to the 5 yard line. And then, there was the 2007 season opener, when Giordano was subbing in for Sanders because the Colts were blowing them away, and he picked off Drew Brees and outran their entire time for a pick-6. Even Reggie Bush couldn't catch him. But regardless, the main reason I want him re-signed is for special teams. Considering he'll actually have a real freakin coach now, maybe he can use some of his veteran leadership to assist the younger guys in not sucking so much. We'll see.
Now that I've explained who I think should stay, it's time to talk about who should go. Sadly, the little tiger who must go is Dominic Rhodes.
|
The time has come my friends to say goodbye to a key contributor in the magical run to the Super Bowl we experienced just 3 years ago. He has certainly cemented his name in Colts lore for his years of dedication and production.
Dominic Rhodes signed with the Colts as an undrafted free agent out of Midwestern State University. He quickly became the backup to Colts legend Edgerrin James. Even as a backup without much experience, he filled in admirably when Edge went down with an ACL injury. Even after suffering a ACL injury of his own, he battled back, eventually becoming the starter during the 2006 season when the Colts decided to let Edge walk. He had a great season, and an even better postseason. Many fans, myself included, believe Rhodes was the rightful winner of the Super Bowl XLI MVP award. He didn't win it, because obviously Peyton Manning did, but something tells me Rhodes didn't care. Nothing about Dom's personality leads me to believe that even if he ran for 300 yards and 4 tds, he would be miffed about not winning the MVP award. All he has ever cared about is helping his team win a championship. Well allow me to say Dom, Mission Accomplished. Luck to you in your future endeavors.
Now, I'm sure a few of you are scratching your heads asking yourself, "Why do you think the Colts should let Dom go?" and the reasoning is very simple: go young. It's no secret that all runningbacks, I repeat, all runningbacks, hit their wall, and will have eventually done all they can on a football field. I believe Dom is there. His age is a concern, and before you know it, his health is going to be a concern as well. Once those tires start getting up there in miles, you're bound to have problems. Truth is, Addai needs someone to take the load off of his shoulders, and Rhodes isn't the guy to do it. By going young, specificially snagging someone (COUGH RASHAD JENNINGS COUGH) in the draft, the Colts can get another back with that explosiveness that is lacking in the running game. Addai isn't a starting back, he is merely a change of pace guy who is deadly out in space. I often wonder why the Colts don't use him more in the passing game, because he could torch teams like he did in 2007 against the Patriots. But when it comes to a pure running back, hitting his holes and laying a good hit or two on guys, Addai just doesn't fit that mold.
With that said, please do not assume I'm saying we should give up on Addai. At the same time, we shouldn't be giving him an infinite amout of passes either. This year is do or die for him. Are we going to get the 2006 Addai, or the mid 2007-current Addai? Either way, the Colts need to fill the void of a north and south runner that will be missing now that Dom is gone.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Wasting a pick?
“The Polian wouldn’t think twice about wasting another first round pick on a receiver.”
Hmm, so Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark and Anthony Gonzalez (all first rounders) were wasted picks? I don’t get your logic. They need to replace Harrison, even if he were to come back, since having three excellent WRs is vital to their offense, and Marvin is clearly at the end of his career. And if they have a chance to grab a WR at #27 they see as a long-term starter, that would be fine with me. The Colts have an excellent track record with taking offensive players in the first round, so I would not consider a WR a waste.
by JTBLA on Mar 15, 2009 3:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think drafting a WR would be vital to the Colts offense in order to win another SB. They really only had 2 back in ‘06 with Clark filling in the slot position, but I think Garcon will be able to come in and fill the need better than a rookie WR. I’m not going to put any blame on Harrison for not taking a huge pay cut to play for the Colts, even though as a fan I would want him back. I have come to realize that he’s not coming back. Edge is not coming back. I say maybe bring back Rhodes for one more year if he’s willing to take that minimum pay, if not, then yea the Colts should be looking for another RB to complement Addai. But whatever Polian decides in free agency and in the draft, i’m behind him 100%.
by ColtsFanNChiTown on Mar 15, 2009 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm, so Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark and Anthony Gonzalez (all first rounders) were wasted picks? I don’t get your logic.
lol I noticed. That’s obviously not what I meant. I meant that if Marvin returned, Polian would have no reason at all to spend another draft pick on another receiver in the first round.
They need to replace Harrison, even if he were to come back
Um, no. That’s what they drafted Gonzalez for.
since having three excellent WRs is vital to their offense
They didn’t win the Super Bowl with 3 stud receivers. They won it with 2 stud receivers, a TE who played in the slot a lot, and a sick run game. To say that they need 3 excellent receivers is completely absurd. Most NFL teams who win championship don’t have 1 excellent receiver, let alone three.
And if they have a chance to grab a WR at #27 they see as a long-term starter, that would be fine with me.
Who is he going to start in place of?
The Colts have an excellent track record with taking offensive players in the first round, so I would not consider a WR a waste.
Well, you’d be wrong. If they drafted another receiver in the first round, he’s going to be riding the bench for another 2 years and won’t have any affect on the team right now. The Colts don’t need to start drafting for the future, when the future is now, and we need to get key pieces in place so that they can make another Super Bowl run while Manning is in his prime.
The Colts have two prospects who have done their time in terms of waiting and learning the offense, why not give them a shot first? For all we know, Roy Hall and Pierre Garcon could be amazing receivers. They could also be duds, but there’s no guaruntee that drafting Hakeem Nicks or Heyward-Bey are going to be great draft picks, ESPECIALLY when someone like Peria Jerry, or James Laurinaitis, or Knowshon Moreno are just waiting there.
This line will remain in my signature until the Colts draft Rashad Jennings in 2009.
Oh and I write words and stuff for Stampede Blue.
by KingRichard on Mar 15, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
About the draft, if Maualuga doesnt fall to 27, I would definetly pick Laurinaitis, even before Peria Jerry…
"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha OK" - Tom Brady
by Piojocuau on Mar 15, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
definatly +100
Nate Davis = beast, God I hope he doesn't go to Detriot.......
by colts9318rock on Mar 15, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it was Dungy who mentioned that he was impressed with how Garcon has transitioned to the NFL during training camp last year. But if Polian does draft a WR, then he probably has seen enough along with the coaching staff, that Garcon and Hall are not going to be amazing receivers and the need to draft one is probably for the best. I still believe that Garcon will be more reliable than a rookie coming in due to his knowledge he has gained towards the offense this past year, but thats not saying a whole lot. Polian said in some sort that when he saw Harrison during his pro day or a team workout back in the day when he didn’t work for the Colts, it was the best workout he has seen for a WR. If there’s some kind of WR that that wows the Colts, then I guess you have to go for it and get that player if they’re still on the board.
by ColtsFanNChiTown on Mar 15, 2009 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ya they would make alot more sense
Right now Manning if starting to get up there in age. After a few years go by he wont be able to carry a team anymore. If the Colts can add someone like Moreno, him and Addai would give us a dominating running game to go along with him. Also someone like Jerry, Hood, or Laurinaitis will be another great playmaker on D. One of these guys will fall to us. I have faith in Garcon or Hall, but if the Colts dont, I would have no problem with a receiver. Just hopefully not in the first round.
by ColtsPurdueFanFromKY on Mar 15, 2009 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The way I see it
With the age and experience on both sides of the ball, I wouldn’t be surprised if Bill begins to build the defense for the eventual retirement of Peyton. They’ll probably draft a QB in the 3rd round next year or the year after and begin the learning process. However, our defense has the overall younger players and talent to turn into a very strong defensive team. The offense is not as overwhelming as it used to be, but still easily a top 5 offense in the league. Besides, even when we were the best offensive team in the league we were still losing in the playoffs.
And you can pretty much throw whatever you base your ideas about how they’re going to draft out the window, it’s not the same team or mentality when it comes to the draft. Caldwell is not Dungy, Coyer is not Meeks, and Rychleski is not Purnell. Most of the time when a coordinator comes in he says what he wants to do and comes when he feels like he can mold their respective responsibility as a coach to be successful.
Coyer wasn’t fired in Tampa Bay, and technically took a downgrade in title to become our DC. Rychleski worked with Caldwell in WF, and considering the 10 minute hiring process, not only does Caldwell feel comfortable with him, but most likely values his opinion and input.
I’ve found two transcripts (actually I’m making these up) of the Coyer/Polian interview for the DC job. You tell me which ones sound realistic.
BP – “Nice to meet you Larry, have a seat.”
LC – “Nice facility you have here.”
BP – “Thank you, thank you. Yes, we enjoy it. Let’s get right down to business shall we. What would YOU add to the Colts to improve our team and offer us that we haven’t had in the past and would impress us enough to get rid of the person who’s been our DC for 7 years and the HC who has had his hands in the defense since he came over from TB?”
LC – “Well Bill, I don’t think it’s breaking down the fundamental principles of physics here. It’s pretty well known that your defense hasn’t been up to par with your offense since Peyton Manning was drafted. I think my track record speaks for itself regarding what my expertise and mentality is when it comes to building a defense. I’ve run the T2 system, and been part of the scheme in various forms since its inception. I implemented the system successfully in Denver and was part of a Monte Kiffin defense in Tampa Bay for the past two seasons.”
BP – “Well that’s nice, but what would YOU offer us that we didn’t have with Meeks and Dungy?”
LC – “I’m not taking anything away from Meeks, but we all know it was Dungy who was running the defense. Dungy is a great coach and a hall of famer in his own right, however, I believe he saw the T2 from the standpoint of a defensive back. Which isn’t really a stretch considering the position he played in Pittsburgh, but it’s pretty well understood that Dungy utilized a Monte Kiffin designed defense in Tampa. He used it well, and it was his idea, but he picked someone to design it and perfect it because he was the HC and had other responsibilities. And as you can tell from my resume, I emphasize the front 7. I built a linebacking core in Denver during my tenure there and was brought into Tampa as a defensive line coach. I think my strengths are suited to directly focus on the deficiencies the Colts have had for years.”
BP – “You’re right Larry, it’s not really a secret where we’ve been lacking. But how would you fix it? Do you believe it’s a personnel problem or a coaching problem?”
LC – “Well, in my opinion it would definitely be a problem with personnel. Tony Dungy is one of the best teachers in NFL history. That’s the reason he’s been so successful as a coach. I’ve paid attention, you haven’t had depth at linebacker and have been pretty snakebitten at DT for years. But every year your defense gets better towards the end of the year because obviously Tony’s teachings were reaching the players. To do that year after year is only a product of what a great coach you’ve had.”
BP – “Well Larry, as you know we’ve never really been a team to jump in and make huge splashes in free agency. The last time we tried that was with Corey Simon and we got burned. So either the people on our team will have to do or we have to get them through the draft. Could you please tell me where, in your opinion, what you would consider our needs and deficiencies? Along with who you think we need to retain and who we should allow to go into free agency.”
LC – “Well, I believe you have a very good secondary in Indy. You’ve had one for years, but that’s not how teams have been beating you. However, if I install and utilize my version of the T2, we can’t let the secondary fall apart. So I feel that we should retain Hayden at all costs. Your depth at safety is phenomenal. Bullitt has shown that he can be a starter and could be a starter in his own right. Your defensive ends are arguably the best duos in the league. Brackett is a very solid MIKE. Session has shown great potential as a SAM. So that really leaves your DT and WILL linebacker because Keiaho doesn’t really fit what I like to see in my system.”
BP – “Wait, let me stop you there for a second. You don’t think we should at least offer Keiaho a tender and recoup a pick for him? Would you suggest we keep Hagler instead?”
LC – “No, because I don’t think anyone is going to give up a 3rd round pick and over a million dollars for him. Hagler is also expendable.”
BP – “Well, our depth at LB isn’t stellar. If we’re going to allow our second best LB to walk, are you saying we need to invest in one during the draft? At the moment, we have some guys we weren’t sold on and a few second year players.”
LC – “To be perfectly honest, your LBs have been a weakness for years. Even while completely healthy, you guys have not been fielding a very good unit. If you want me to be your DC, I want a LB I can count on. You can see the type of LBs I like when I drafted D.J. Williams in Denver. And Derrick Brooks is the best T2 WILL linebacker in history in regards to the T2 scheme. You’ve also been able to turn some players who could be considered average at best into some decent DTs. Imagine what could’ve happened if your luck had been a bit better and you had an elite NT for your system. I believe that you have very good depth at the DT position, but I think you could easily find a starter in the first couple rounds at either NT or UT. Considering the importance of a NT in a T2 system, I believe that in tandem with a WILL linebacker that can attack the line, you could have a very dominant defense.”
BP – “So from what you’re saying is that you’d like to draft starters who could see playing time next year? If we let Keiaho go, I’m not sure anyone can step in right away and not see a significant dropoff in production. Brackett’s coming off a foot injury very similar to what Dwight had. It took Dwight a little bit of time to fully recover. What do you think the impact of letting Keiaho and Hagler walk would have if we didn’t invest an early pick in the draft that addressed the situation?”
LC – “Well, quite frankly, it’d be worse. And I don’t want my name on a poor defense. If you want me as your DC, I’d want my voice to be heard when it came to the draft.”
BP – “Ok, let’s just lay it out. If you come to Indy as the DC you want a LB or DT high in the draft?”
LC – “To be perfectly honest, it’d probably be the only way I’d come. You have problems, I have a good gig going, but I know what you have and know where you need help. Yes, I’d want to take a LB within the first couple of rounds and possibly a DT. I may be able to work with them for awhile at DT, but let’s not kid ourselves, you traded a second round pick for McFarland in 2006, drafted Pitcock in the 3rd round in the ensuing draft, and you attempted to trade a 3rd round pick for McCargo this year. I’m known as being a linebacker and a defensive line coach. We both know that the reason your run defense became better at the end of last year was more due to utilizing a difference defensive scheme and not solely the performance of the players you had on the field. The reason you’re talking to me in the first place is because you obviously feel that the defense has problems. And my forte directly addresses what’s been well documented as your deficiency. My name will be on this defense and I want the players I need to have success. I’m not asking for a promise because I know how the draft works, but I am asking for my voice to be heard. If you think your defensive play has been holding you back and you want your run defense to step up to contribute to the final years of Peyton’s career in a positive way, I’m your guy. If you think everything’s been fine, feel your defense is just fine and continuing down this path will lead to postseason success, I suggest you retain Meeks. Because there ARE some things I would want you to provide me to succeed. If you can promise me that, I can promise you I will do everything in my power to improve this team before the window closes.”
BP (picking up his phone) – “Someone get Ron Meeks on the line and put together a "Thank you for your service” gift."
And this is the conversation that apparently went down considering all the mocks.
BP – “Wassup Larry. Go ahead and sit down, I’m on the phone trying to setup a trade for Boldin. If that falls through, I’m thinking about letting Hayden go and getting Housh and four or five other WRs. Just be a minute.”
LC – “Um…ok.”
BP (2 hours later) – “Alright, well I guess if he wants to go to Seattle that’s FINE! (slams phone down). Ah, Larry, still here? Well what’s up?”
LC – “Hey man, I really need a job. Crap’s hitting the fan down in Tampa. Jon’s out, little shaky. I’ve got rent due at the end of the month. Could you hook me up?”
BP – “You’d better be trying a little harder than that bub. Nothing’s wrong with our defense, it’s our OFFENSE man! Don’t people realize that even though it’s a huge letdown, we’re SWEET in the regular season?! Why would I get rid of Meeks for you?”
LC – “Pretty please?”
BP – “Alright, whatever. Too bad that Tony Dungy quack couldn’t run a Tampa 2 with all these amazingly awesome players we’ve had for years. Just to give you some inside info, we’re letting Harrison go and we’re taking a WR in the first, second, third, and sixth rounds. I know he pretty much hasn’t been playing for 2 years and that we drafted Gonzalez to be his replacement, but now we need a replacement for Harrison.”
LC – “Wait, what? You drafted Anthony Gonzalez to replace Marvin Harrison and used him in the slot to get playing time? Why would you draft a replacement for Harrison when you uh…drafted a replacement for Harrison already?”
BP – “WHO TOLD YOU YOU COULD THINK?! SHUT UP! Go get me some coffee or something. Make yourself useful. Oh, and we’re letting all your LBs go too, deal with it. Just make sure to go around and tell everyone that YOU, LARRY COYER, will be the DC next year. I’m giving you absolutely no input, I’m getting rid of your LBs, and if you screw up, it’ll only prove that I’m a super awesome GM and all my defensive coordinators suck. (picking up the phone again) Someone get Al Davis on the line. I want to trade him our 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th round picks so we can get Crabtree. And put Freeney on the trading block, maybe we can get Crabtree’s replacement. (looking up at Coyer) Why are you still here? GET OUT!”
Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.
by monstersbox on Mar 16, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 



























