New OC Clyde Christensen and the 2001 Bucs
The Colts new offensive coordinator has held the position before. In 2001 Christensen was promoted from QBs coach to Offensive Coordinator for Tony Dungy's Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Like Dungy, Christensen and the rest of that Bucs O have targets for the Bucs fans' frutrations, but how deserving is that blame?
| Year | Christensen | DVOA | Rank | Points | Rank |
| 1995 | Clemson Co-OC | -12.6% | 27th | 238 | 29th |
| 1996 | TE Coach | -20.2% | 28th | 221 | 30th |
| 1997 | TE Coach | -4.1% | 15th | 299 | 23rd |
| 1998 | TE Coach | -11.0% | 21st | 314 | 18th |
| 1999 | QB Coach | -17.3% | 21st | 270 | 27th |
| 2000 | QB Coach | 3.0% | 12th | 388 | 6th |
| 2001 | O Coordinator | -2.8% | 12th | 324 | 15th |
| 2002 | In Indy | -2.5% | 21st | 346 | 18th |
| 2003 | In Indy | -4.5% | 17th | 301 | 18th |
| 2004 | In Indy | -5.8% | 22nd | 301 | 23rd |
Out of the decade surronding Christensen's time with the Bucs the Christensen Coordinated Bucs O was top 3 in DVOA and Points Scored and top 2 in league rank in both DVOA and Points. His offense wasn't a standout in the league, but for the Bucs, it was a very good offense.
Two other comparisons to roughly gauge style
| 1999-2000 | 2001 | 2002-2003 | |
| Pass/Run | 47-53 | 59-41 | 58-42 |
| Yards/Completion | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.6 |
Christensen's O marked a dramatic shift in playcalling, with the pass going from less than half the plays to nearly 60%. Though he favored the pass Christensen's O didn't attack deep any more so than the previous, run heavy Bucs Os (for comparison last year's Colts averaged 10.6 Y/C).
Christensen's previous stint running an offense suggests he's a better offensive coach than most of what Tampa had before and after him, and that he likes to throw the ball often, but not particularly deep (or not deep particularly often).
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Deep pass
Part of the reason he didn’t call many deep passes in 2001 is because the Bucs QB at the time (Brad Johnson) had no arm. Also, their #1 receiving option was Keyshawn Johnson. Not exactly blazing speed there for deep routes.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
yeah, but the next two years they went deep more
with Brad Johnson and Keyshawn still their QB/WR combo
I don’t think he’s opposed to going deep, I think he isn’t in love with it (like Gruden was coming out of Oakland)
by shake n bake on May 19, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions
it's from Football Outsiders.com
here’s their quick explanation
DVOA is a method of evaluating teams, units, or players. It takes every single play during the NFL season and compares each one to a league-average baseline based on situation. DVOA measures not just yardage, but yardage towards a first down: five yards on third-and-4 are worth more than five yards on first-and-10 and much more than five yards on third-and-12. Red zone plays are worth more than other plays. Performance is also adjusted for the quality of the opponent. DVOA is a percentage, so a team with a DVOA of 10.0% is 10 percent better than the average team, and a quarterback with a DVOA of -20.0% is 20 percent worse than the average quarterback. Because DVOA measures scoring, defenses are better when they are negative.
Here’s the link to a more in-depth explanation
Not everyone likes it, but I’m a statgeek.
by shake n bake on May 19, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Another point...
You have to believe he’s learned significantly from Moore and others while in Indy. I think about what I know now (in my profession) compared to what I knew in 2001 and it’s not even close.
True
In 2001, I was a college sophomore being hazed into a fraternity. In 2009, I’m a doctor. A lot can change in 8 years.

by 











