Super Bowl to be held in London?
Apparently, the Super Bowl could be held in London within a foreseeable future.
6 months ago
jocre
15 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Boooooooooo
Australia all the way!!! This sports mad nation would embrace the Superbowl more then any other country!!!
Alcohol, the cause of - and solution too - all of life's problems!
by AussieColtsFan on May 3, 2009 8:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
…except for America of course
Alcohol, the cause of - and solution too - all of life's problems!
by AussieColtsFan on May 3, 2009 8:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
:P
Alcohol, the cause of - and solution too - all of life's problems!
by AussieColtsFan on May 4, 2009 6:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand why, still don't like it.
I know they are trying to export the NFL and England is selling tickets like mad. How did the NBA and Baseball do it? I don’t remember either of them exporting the Finals or the World Series.
by MarkFive05 on May 3, 2009 12:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's the dumbest thing....
That has ever been proposed by the NFL and is primarily a publicity stunt. It will be a sad day when NFL fans in the states, the people who pay for the stadiums these teams play in, who fill the stands full for a lot of teams around the country, who purchase team products and memorabilia by the truck loads. We’re talking millions of people in the United States who follow the NFL every year, who pay extra money to watch the NFL Network year round, and who attend team training camps or pay to watch pre-season games. These people will have to plan a trip across the Atlantic Ocean costing thousands of dollars just to watch their favorite team play the biggest game of the year for the loyal followers, and they’ll have to do it in a stadium (most likely) which is smaller, less well-managed, and entirely unfamiliar to the players in the game. thumbs up Turn the NFL into an international Harlem Globetrotter like attraction. >.<
All that said, I am sure there will be a handful of American football fans in the greater European area who will be stoked that the game is there. It’s a “nice gesture” by the NFL but at the expense of the die hard loyal following in the U.S. which keeps their league viable. Oh well.
by bamock on May 3, 2009 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's not a publicity stunt
But it is a money spinner.
And since when did you get the idea that the NFL cares about you in any way other than a loyal fan to take money off? It’s a business, as long as they have a passionate captive audience willing to pay for the various products they put out there, they’ll keep taking advantage of you.
Building brand loyalty is what marketing is all about, you want a captive audience who’ll buy your brand no matter what you do with it. And in professional sports, the marketers have insane brand loyalty from the start. Thinking you’re more valuable than your wallet is, unfortunately, tragically naive.
by eltharion_doa on May 3, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stating my opinion about...
The plan to move the Super Bowl to London does not make me naive or make me think all of the things you just said that I think. I said what I think, how I feel about the plan to move the Super Bowl to London. I never said what I thought about my value to the NFL as a fan, I never said that the fans hold the NFL hostage in its decision-making and I never said that NFL fans are not a captive audience or would abandon the NFL if it chooses to hold the Super Bowl in London.
Publicity stunt is code-speak for marketing ploy, if that was unclear. I never even said it was a bad plan for the NFL by way of marketing. I simply said I think its wrong, I don’t like it, I think the NFL should not move the Super Bowl to London and that it is disloyal to the loyal fan base in this country who makes it possible for the NFL to exist. If you think that is untrue, I’ll respectfully disagree. Putting words into my mouth in an effort to make me naive; that’s something you’ve created on your own.
by bamock on May 3, 2009 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't see how this affect the regular fan
I was under the impression that most of the tickets to the super bowl are handed out to sponsors and VIPs, leaving a few thousand tickets for the fans. And still then, if you dish out around $2000 dollars for the ticket and around 500 $ or so for flight tickets and spare change. The price for a flight to SF from NY is 228 $ while it is 444 $ from Paris to NY. Considering how expensive the game will be anyway, it is not like this difference is gonna affect the fans that much.
I’m not sure people get how great the potential is in europe. Even in tiny Denmark where I’m from(size of massachusetts, and some 5.5 million inhabitants) we have around 70.000 loyal viewers each week. And the games are only showing on payment channels. So imagine what it is like in the big european countries. The NFL europe games gathered somewhere between 20.000 and 30.000 spectators pr match, and those were scrubs playing.
by jocre on May 4, 2009 3:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Horrible idea.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on May 4, 2009 12:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Redicules on so many levels
Starting with the fact that our economy is in shambles and these events can provide a boost to the host city. Even though they’re talking about several years hence, the timing of the announcement is extremely poor. If weather isn’t apparently a factor any more, I could think of a dozen cities in the US more deserving than a foreign city – Detroit, any one?
by LovinBlue on May 4, 2009 1:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on May 4, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless Detroit builds a dome
They are not likely to get a Super Bowl. The NFL doesn’t want to put the Super Bowl in a stadium where there is even a chance of snow, ice, or any other kind of cold weather.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on May 7, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Assuming the proposed site is Wembley Stadium
I don’t believe their roof fully covers the playing surface either, so that’s why I mused that weather isn’t apparently a factor any more (and did so sort of tongue-in-cheek).
by LovinBlue on May 7, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could see a Super Bowl outside of the US
ONLY when there is an established franchise team outside the US that is a part of the NFL.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on May 7, 2009 9:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs





















