Reasons to Feel Significantly Better About the '09 Colts v. the '08 Colts
Recently, Paul Kuharsky, AFC South blogger for ESPN.com, did a series covering each of the AFC South teams, polling fans on a number of topics. Kuharksy then reported the highest rated response from the options given and provided his own answer and commentary to support his conclusion. The topic this post will discuss and respond to is below:
How should Colts fans feel about their team as compared to last year?
- Significantly better
- Slightly better
- Slightly worse
- Significantly worse
- About the same
Right now, 48 percent of you say slightly better. Reasonable, but incorrect. Even though I think they're capable of winning the Super Bowl and like how they addressed the interior defensive line and running back, I say slightly worse. Losing Tony Dungy has to hurt at least a little and while Marvin Harrison wasn't the same, his departure can also have an effect.
In my honest opinion, I think the poll results and Kuharsky's opinion are both wrong. I will discuss why I think Kuharksy is wrong first and then move on to explain why I think Colts fans should feel significantly better about their team as compared to last year.
Kuharsky, You're Wrong
Kuharsky cites the loss of Tony Dungy and Marvin Harrison as reasons why Colts fans should feel slightly worse about the team this year. However, in my opinion, and with all due respect, the loss of Dungy is not a reason for fans to feel worse about our team's ability to succeed.
First, Caldwell may not be the same guy as Dungy but he's worked with Dungy for a decade and in many respects, plans to follow the same general plan Dungy has had in place for the Colts for years. Second, what changes Caldwell has made to the team, so far, have only served to increase our likelihood to succeed. Bringing in Coyer and moving toward a larger, stronger, defensive philosophy is welcomed by Colts fans, many who have been asking for this for years. Bringing in Rychleski as the new special teams coach is highly popular and can only improve the Colts special teams which has been horrid for years as well.
The only potential loss from Dungy's retirement will be in the leadership department; when the team needs to stay together if it suffers through a rough patch. We don't know yet whether players will rally around Caldwell, be inspired by Caldwell, or respond to Caldwell in the same way they did Dungy. Whatever impact that has on the team, I find it unlikely that it will outweigh the improvements we've seen Caldwell make to this point. Additionally, from an environmental perspective, that he is not as steadfastly loyal to players may encourage players to work even harder to ensure they still have a job here. Caldwell does not appear shy to make changes if he thinks it is best for the team.
In terms of Marvin Harrison, again with all due respect, the Colts have been without Marvin Harrison for the better part of two years now. Marvin Harrison was gone the day he injured his knee and never returned. Not only did Marvin Harrison not prove to be the offensive weapon he was in the past, there were times when he hurt our offense through his lack of effort, physical limitations, or other mental issues he has not had in the past. Suggesting that "not having Harrison" would be a reason for Colts to feel "worse" about our chances is simply not paying attention to Harrison's relative absence from having an impact last year at all.
Accordingly, I don't think Kuharsky's big reasons to feel slightly worse this year have a great deal of merit and in both cases, I think they may actually be reasons to feel more confident moving forward.
Why Fans Should Feel Significantly Better About The Team This Year
Oh let me count the reasons.
1) PEYTON MANNING
Really Paul? You really forgot this one? Peyton Manning missed all of summer work outs last year, came into the season out of rhythm, and played with a broken leg for four to five games. During those four to five games Manning had to compensate for lost leg strength, couldn't execute the stretch play, and used the remainder of the season to try to get "back to normal..." and despite his impressive performance and league MVP honors, I'm not sure he ever fully did. This year he can put on the weight he lost last year, refine his mechanics and form to normal, get his timing down with receivers, and likely not have issues throwing some of the passes he struggled with all last year. This reason alone would be enough to feel significantly better about our team this year but it certainly doesn't stop here.
2) JEFF SATURDAY/OFFENSIVE LINE
If it isn't enough to have a hobbled Hall of Fame QB, the QB of the offensive line went down with injury, missed a number of games, passed on surgery, and played injured the rest of the year. Saturday will now come into the season healthier than he's been in a year.
Add to that the experience Pollak had last year, which all but guaranteed to make him a better player this year, and include all of the other linemen who gained a great deal of experience, as injuries riddled the line, and you'll see that our starting group will be better and healthier; and our back-ups will be more experienced and more prepared to rotate in if and when they're needed. More importantly, with a healthy offensive line we can establish continuity and chemistry amongst the starting group which is all but certain to improve Peyton's protection and our run blocking. I've not mentioned any of the linemen we picked up either.
3) DONALD BROWN
It's one thing to have Addai and Rhodes as your RBs, when neither is really able to be as productive as you'd like. It's another thing entirely to have two 1A caliber options at RB to use as weapons on the ground and as potential safety valves for Peyton Manning. Brown brings the type of game-breaking threat out of the backfield that the Colts haven't had since Edgerrin James' first two years in the NFL. I think pairing him with Addai, and considering Hart's full recovery and additional year of experience in the Colts system, gives fans ample reason to feel significantly better about the Colts this year.
4) WIDE RECEIVERS
It is hard for Colts fans to imagine saying this but I believe it is true. The Colts wide receivers will be better this year because Marvin Harrison is not here. As discussed above, he really wasn't productive last year, nor reliable. However, Anthony Gonzalez is poised to have his first 1,000 yard season as a receiver, giving Peyton his first pair of 1,000 yard receivers in three years. Add to that the development of Pierre Garcon earning him praises from Polian, the amazing upside and ability of Collie, and the compliments Roy Hall has received in his development and you have the deepest group of WRs the Colts have had in a long time. There is no reason to believe that a productive third receiving option will not find its way out of that trio, nor to believe that the Colts won't have a full arsenal of legitimate back-ups at receiver. I know most of these guys are not household names yet, like Marvin Harrison, but sit back and watch as our passing game steps it up a notch with this bunch.
5) TIGHT ENDS
Dallas Clark is a constant but what is more important is the foundation Bill Polian laid at this position two drafts ago. When the Colts took Jacob Tamme and Tom Santi they were looking to replace the departing Ben Utecht (wouldn't take much). Last year the two young ends were injured but return healthy this season. More importantly, they have had a year to digest the Colts offensive scheme, playbook, and adjust to the speed of the game in the NFL. Hmm... what else were they missing last year that kept them from having a bigger impact during the season? Oh yeah! Peyton Manning will have a full summer to establish timing with these guys this season, along with Gijon Robinson. I am confident that all three of our TEs are more valuable then Utecht was, have higher upsides than Utecht did, and will all be better players than they were last season. IE - We're set to see a great deal of improvement from our young TEs, only adding to the weapons Manning has at his disposal.
That covers the offense... how about defense?
6) DEFENSIVE TACKLES/DEFENSIVE LINE
Holy schnikeys! The amount of talent and size the Colts have added this off-season at the DT position is breath-taking. Is there any doubt AT ALL that, whatever rotation of defensive tackles makes it onto the regular season roster, our ability to stop the run will at least marginally improve? I'm being modest so as to not get our hopes up but seriously, our run defense is better day 1 with the talent we've added on the inside than it was all of last season.
Oh but wait! That's not all folks! With larger DTs, many of whom also excel at penetrating, getting push or otherwise rushing the passer, there is little doubt that the amount of attention opposing offensive lines can afford to place on our DEEP group of DEs will be reduced. Reducing the amount of attention you place on Freeney/Mathis = certain doom for your QB. In short, our pass-rush from the front four is all but guaranteed to improve is well.
7) BOB SANDERS
Last year was one of Sanders' roughest years fighting injury. This year, after a summer to rest, he will surely enter the season healthy. Now, what is important is the changes that have been made on defense and how they impact Sanders. With a stouter front seven, Sanders will be relied on less to sacrifice himself in confrontations with offensive linemen and will be able to sit back more and pick out who to destroy, like he used to. This will improve his longevity and effectiveness on the defense and will likely result in massive infliction of pain against his enemies. Accordingly, Bobzilla is back and with his new friends, poised to terrorize the league once more.
8) MARLIN JACKSON/CORNERBACK
Some believe Jackson's pass coverage skills are suspect. And to a degree they're probably right. However, few will argue that they'd rather have Tim Jennings in the game than Marlin Jackson. Accordingly, his healthy return to the lineup will be very welcome. What's more, he's in his contract year. He has A LOT to prove and A LOT of time to make up for from his injury last year. The result? He should play very hard and have a wail of a season.
He too will benefit from the stouter front 7 and will be less likely to miss time with nicks and dings he tends to pick up laying the wood against his opponents. The experience Tim Jennings got last season, as much as I'm not a Jennings fan, certainly will help him make an impact this year at the nickel. His familiarity with the scheme, with the role both inside and out, and playing against NFL competition in games when it matters, should make him more valuable on the field.
QUESTION MARKS
The only position on the field I'm unsure of in LB at this point. Sure, OT is questionable in terms of depth but overall the OL should be better than last season. On the other hand, LB shouldn't be any worse but I don't know if there's a big reason to suspect that it can be better (outside of the DT trickle down theory). Time will tell.
Additionally, as much as there are reasons to be confident that special teams can improve under Rychleski, who will return kicks and punts is still up in the air. We'll have to see how that situation develops before we can use it as a reason to feel any better or worse about our chances this season.
Those are my thoughts, what are yours?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.
21 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
24 HOURS AGO..
I would’ve said this is the best offseason we’ve had in years: virtually no losses and a LOT of improvements..now with Tom Moore’s/Howard Mudd’s possible retirement, I’m starting to get scared…
David Burton to the COLTS!
Disagree on Sanders, but hope I'm wrong
As I posted in Dr. Blue, I fear that his ankle sprain may be months in rehab.
I’m also nervous – though perhaps only relatively so – about our OL and its ability to help make the RB, WR and TE dreams all true…
I wasn't concerned about the coaching changes
but Mudd and Moore might be pushing it too far.
Half the game too lazy
still sleepin' on me
but I'm 'bout to wake 'em
-Lil' Wayne "Fireman"
I wish I could convince you all...
To breath easy on the Moore/Mudd coaching issue. First, Moore is not required in order to run, or otherwise coordinate this offense. The head coach and assistant head coach are both offensive guys who are intricately familiar with the Moore offense. More importantly, Manning knows the Moore offense as well or better than Moore and without Moore may be in the position to make a few tweaks or improvements to it as well. Additionally, no position coach, other than Mudd, will be exiting the team and all of them have been trained and are highly familiar with the responsibilities of the players at their positions in the Moore offensive scheme.
Second, Mudd is one of the best offensive line coaches in football and it could potentially hurt player development with all the youngsters we’ve brought in at the position but the assistant-offensive line coach has been here since 2004 and most certainly has been heavily influenced by Mudd’s teachings. As a result, little by way of change in the actual lessons taught by the new offensive line coach, should we have one, should be expected. That said, great teachers are not something you find anywhere so the impact to the development of offensive linemen over the summer may well be noticeable.
As for Sanders, I read the very informative Dr. Blue post on his condition but have seen him year after year fight through far worse injuries than a high ankle sprain and find his way onto the field for game 1. As per usual, it is likely Sanders will spend a huge amount of practice time resting the injury to increase the speed with which it can heal. I could be over-confident and you and your friend (the medical one) know far more about it than me, just call it one of those dangerous “gut feelings.”
I’m not nervous about the OL at all. As I mentioned, the only question-marks I have surround the OT position but I think the improvements on the interior portion of the offensive line will more than make up for whatever weakness we have on the outside, as I don’t see either of our OTs performing at a lower level than they did last year (barring injury) so long as they play with a consistent group of interior linemen to the inside. I think there’s a good chance that they will and, as such, their play will improve.
I hope you're right about Moore and Mudd...
I will miss hearing the stories of Mudd’s golf cart terror at mini camp though.
On a serious note, I agree about Sanders. If I recall correctly, last season he spent much of the time off the field with a knee problem…swelling that the medical staph couldn’t get under control. Not only did he miss games, but he missed alot of practices as well.
Regarding the OL, I agree that with a healthy Saturday and the rooks acquiring experience last year, they will continue to improve. My concern is also with OT. Perhaps with Caldwell its possible Ugoh will find that drive and determination he had in his rookie year. (Oh, how I still long for you, Tarik)
When it comes down to it, a healthy Peyton in camp is HUGE to the offense. Huge. He will help raise the play of all the receivers, tight ends, etc.
I wish Moore and Mudd didn’t have to leave. I hate change. But, I still feel better about this team than I did this time last year. (please, God, no injuries during camp….pretty please)
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on May 6, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Re: OL
Polian quoted Marv Levy in a recent NFL Network interview. When asked about his draft picks, he stated (paraphrasing), “(Levy) always said, who are going to be the best rookies this year? Last year’s rookies…”
He was pointing to the development of players in the NFL, and the biggest improvements are seen from year 1 to year 2.
Using that guideline, along with the amount of playing time that each of those rookies got last year, I am confident that the OL performance will be much improved over last year.
"Senior citizens, although slow and dangerous behind the wheel, can still serve a purpose."
The unknowns
Excellent post (as usual), but I would hesitate to put so many of the “unknown” variables in the positive category.
1. I too have confidence in Caldwell. And, in my mind, he has made all the right moves so far. But we won’t (and can’t) know his true ability to pick up where Dungy left off until we watch him in action. As DZ pointed out in the comments to this thread, I think that Dungy was under-rated as an in-game coach, and the Colts often seemed to benefit from half-time adjustments (you could point to nearly every game last year as examples). Can Caldwell do the same? We’ll have to wait and see.
2. O-Line: With Mudd out, all bets are off. Metzelaars seems to be well positioned as a replacement, but Mudd’s absence due to surgery last year was disturbingly conspicuous.
3. RBs – Agreed, but see #2.
4. WRs – it’s true that we’ve been effectively without Marvin for 1.5 years, but we’ve yet to see Gonzo take the next step. I think he can, but whether he does and whether Collie, Garcon, and/or Hall emerge as viable 3rd options are big unknowns. Manning has shown he can succeed with only 1 go-to guy, but I don’t think we can chalk this up as a definite area of improvement.
5. TEs, agreed, they can only get better. Hopefully, they won’t be needed in pass protection as much as they were last year, but see #2.
6. Can’t argue that we should be better here. Heck, even without the rookies we are slated to have Big Ed back. And, really, there’s no where to go but up.
7. I too think Bob will have a good year (2009 is an odd number, isn’t it?) and we shouldn’t have any problems at safety when compared to last year.
8. No reason for pessimism when compared to last year w/r/t the DBs.
9. I actually think the LBs are less of a question mark than they were last year given the health of Brackett and the fact that we are returning all of our starters. Compared to last year, we should be fine.
For me, ## 1 and 2 are big “ifs” and reason alone for me to stay realistic about the upcoming season.
Rec'd
Love it.
Agree with all points in the post.
Marvin’s loss will be felt the least IMO. It is TBD whether Dungy’s departure will be felt or not, but I love what I am seeing out of Caldwell so far, and I have 100% confidence that he will get the job done.
I say the Colts will be much better this year, all around, than last year. I want to see a division title first, and I don’t care about record as long as it is one better than the Titans, Jags and Texans, but if this team makes the playoffs and has good health going in, I don’t see a reason why we aren’t playing in Miami again.
"Senior citizens, although slow and dangerous behind the wheel, can still serve a purpose."
Still concerned
I think the DL is much improved.
Receiving looks ok.
LB looks ok to me, with enough experienced depth.
DB’s could be of some concern healthwise.
Coaching losses will hurt, but can be overcome.
OL is of some concern to me, especially with Mudd retiring.
My major concern is RB in critical short yardage situations.
The Colts still haven’t addressed this glaring problem that’s been festering for several years now.
The Colts can claim Hart is fully recovered (less than a year after surgery), but I won’t believe that until I see it.
Addai doesn’t do very well in straight ahead short yardage.
Brown is an unknown in this situation.
Lance Ball may be the best candidate for this type of situation, but he may be placed on the practice squad.
I’m just as concerned about this part of the Colts game as I was before.
Im concerned about the OL
Really, last year, it was a mess. We dont know how much this guys like Pollak have learned. They are going to be better, thats for sure, but how much?
Im also concerned about LB, considering Brackett comes from an injury that has proven that without him, our D is greatly weakened. Session would be another solid guy, but i dont know if we can trust Keiaho or even Seward. KO needs to prove a lot and with Adam, we still have to see his performance.
Both concerns arent something we cant overcome but they still need some attention to improve there quickly
About WRs, i guess were OK. Also about RBs.
We have the best center, the best tight end, an elite WR, the best DEs, an elite safety and of course, the best QB in this league. Those are enough reasons to feel good about the next season. (now add some depth at DT and RB and you can feel even better)
"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady
Bamock you read my freaking mind!
Regarding your points on Moore and Mudd:
Not to diss Moore, he’s great, but let’s face it folks…we were going to deal with this sooner or later; the dude’s like 100 years old. I always figured Dungy leaving would be a good exit clause for many of the Colts’ older coaches, even before news of this horrible pension situation reared it’s ugly head. Also (again, not to diss him) I’ve seen Moore run the same variation of about ten plays for 90% of games for years. You don’t think Manning can pretty much figure this stuff out on his own?
Mudd…different story, but you’ve got to remember he missed time last year. The younger OL-men (Pollack, Richard, Justice) plus the rooks should all have no trouble adjusting to and identifying with the new guy, whoever it is (especially if it’s Metzelaars, who coached the 2007 rooks during Mudd’s absence last year). I think Mudd’s biggest asset was his ability to transform no-names like Jeff Saturday and Charlie Johnson into versatile, consistent performers. He turned Saturday from an unheralded waiver pick-up into a future HOFer, and say what you want about Johnson, Mudd maximized his talent by teaching him every position on the line. So that bodes well for Johnson, and I think his chances of making the roster are increased, simply because he already knows every position and Mudd’s not going to be around to teach all those positions to the new guys. But other than that, I think this group can hang.
Regarding the rest of your post:
Bob’s going to be in/out all year, no matter what. We just have to deal with that and hope Bullitt is as good next year as he was last.
Totally agree with you on Manning. Given that he was the HANDS DOWN MVP last year on a surgically-repaired knee, with at times, only two viable receivers, a broke-down O-line, and an injured starting HB…I’d say this guy is still improving. It’s amazing what he did, and amazing to think of what he can do if he’s somehow still getting better.
Manning/Moore/Dungy…whoever…decided to force-feed Marv over the past season and a half, just because of who he is/was. This will no longer be a problem, and Manning can freely throw to Gonzo (who, by the way, is quietly a lot better than Reggie Wayne was at this point in his career).
This defense is freakin’ stacked. There’s a chance that the Colts could cut TWO of their three most prominent DTs from 08 to make room for newer, bigger, and potentially better guys. That’s a good problem to have. The LB corps could be the deepest in the league. The safeties, as I’ve already touched upon, are great. CBs could be more talented and deeper, but with luck they won’t have to be.
My feeling is that as long as this team can survive the chemistry shake-up the new regime will bring, it’s a 13-14 win Super Bowl contender from day one. If the new coaches/coordinators are too much for these guys to handle, they’re back fighting for the second spot in the division.
What's the point
Of doing a poll, getting the results, and then saying "I don’t agree with the way fans answered “how should the fans feel about their team” so I’m going to tell you how you feel". He’s actually one of the better AFC South writers, but that’s pretty stupid.
And the situation with Moore; well, it’s more of his theory behind how the offense is run than the actual play calling. Moore sends in 3 plays, two which are pass plays and 1 which is a run play. The theory is complicated because it puts the stress on the QB to be able to read and analyze a defense prior to the snap, but the plays really aren’t that complicated. The reason it’s considered “revolutionary” is that, for the most part, no QB prior to Manning had the cerebral capacity to be handed the power to decide what to run.
The system is great, but I actually think one of the reasons for our playoff struggles is the plays within the system. When you don’t face teams regularly, it’s extremely difficult to figure out. But when you’re facing good teams with good defenses, it can definitely be exploited when they know we’re either going to run an iso or a stretch, or curl or a slant. Considering most of the teams that knock us out in the playoffs are teams we’ve faced pretty much as our division rivals, it’s not shocking to me when our offense gets shut down anymore.
The system succeeds because of Peyton, not many other QBs could run the system. So keep the system, get another OC with fresh plays the AFC hasn’t seen for over a decade, and it might actually be a positive if someone else takes over as OC. This isn’t a knock on Moore at all, the whole idea of actually giving your QB the power to recognize and decide to either pass, run, or audible is awesome. But as I said, the system has succeeded so well with Peyton’s accuracy, vision, pocket awareness and the ability to recognize what type of defense he’s facing. We don’t confuse, we execute. Be nice to execute some confusing plays every once in awhile.
I putting a copyright on that saying though, I like it. “We don’t confuse, we execute.” It may have to take over for my Sorgi signature.
Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.
you like Kuharsky?
Only because I have a lot of respect for what you write here, I’ve gotta ask. I guess he can’t be blamed if he does what all the other draft dunces do around March and April and act as though it only lasts one round and therefore must reflect ultimately what the coaches believe to be a team’s most fundamental POSITIONAL NEED, but I think there’s other evidence for him being a bit out of touch at times. I can deal with his rather wooden personality, but he only covers four teams, and doesn’t seem interested enough in any of them to really learn the roster. He’s been high on Gonzalez, for which he gets credit, but anyone who watches the games knows there’s very little to dislike about Gonzo and that only because he’s been playing behind a future HOFer has he had to wait this long to see more time. Maybe because he’s a bit low on energy it saves him from the shrill pronouncements of doom we hear with every Colts loss, but I still think he’s swimming with the stream for the most part, just at a slower, duller pace.
Just needed to get a rant off my chest.
by CooperManningsNotTrying on May 8, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not disagreeing with any of that
But he’s one of the very few writers that actually has any idea what he’s talking about. Everyone else doesn’t 1) Know the team 2) Know what the team needs 3) Thinks Peyton Manning is overrated 4) Seems to want us to fall flat on our face. Kuharsky actually writes something semi intelligent every few weeks. Can’t say that about the rest of the mainstream media. I do agree that he seems pretty “meh” in quite a bit of what he writes, but that’s better than me wanting to slash the tires of several writers for a little while after I read their articles. Maybe I give him credit because he doesn’t focus on the negative, and that’s something that’s been getting out of hand lately. I’d rather read something boring than some trumped up story that has nothing behind it except the intense typing of some moron with a bad haircut.

Jim Sorgi runs a 4.6 40. That's all I've got to say about that.
like it or not
Change is inevitable. Is there ever a good time to lose a Mudd or Moore? The worst part about losing either one or both is that we just lost Dungy, too. As with Cadwell taking over, we have to be confident that the assistants have been groomed well enough to take over. I agree with us needing fresh plays. It may be time for some new blood. Ever wonder why Moore hasn’t become a head coach somewhere? I love the man and think he’s one of, if not the best, at what he does. But there comes a time for all of us…
mama said foosball is for the devil - 18forever
mostly agreed
my only problem with this and im not saying im absolutely right—is that its hard for me to think that marvin’s experience can be replaced by a rookie or for that matter gonzolez either. i felt much of marvin’s issues last year were of peyton’s doing given peyton missed all the time he would normally spend on timing with his receivers. couple that with marvin missing most of the previous season and it’s easy to understand why they would be out of sync. now marvin had obviously lost his step off of the line but it usually seemed to me that the ones he would have normally caught and didnt he was still open leaving the cornerback behind. against baltimore marvin had two touchdowns and about broke chris mccallister’s ankles in the end zone. so i think our normal expectations of marvin took away from what he did do last year. marvin wasnt the only colt that had some issues catching some of peyton’s uncharachteristic over-throws last year. if anyone expected marvin to catch 143 in a season again they were being quite unrealistic. you’ll never convince me he hurt our offense though. what hurt our offense was no running game so db’s didnt have to come up to stop runs—-all they had to do was sit in coverage. hopefully more experience in run schemes and the addition of brown will change that. having three rookies on the offensive line for a stretch last year sure didnt do our offense any favors. im very anxious for the next season to begin. summer isnt even here yet and im ready for it to be done because the anticipation of seeing 600 plus lbs. anchoring the center of our d-line is killing me. i hope the mudd and moore situation gets resolved without them leaving yet. change is inevitiable, but it needs to come in small doses. the team has experienced plenty enough change for one off-season. lets save some for next year.
Marvin Harrison is probably my favorite Colts player of all time, but he definitely was a shadow of his former self the last two years. It helped that most of his career was built around his excellent route-running and use of fakes, because he would not have survived that long on using his athleticism alone. However, having a receiver you can’t throw to is like having a basketball player that can’t score. What’s the point? Also, having some young, tough receivers may help us in the run game, especially when we run the stretch play to the outside. Marvin wasn’t exactly Hines Ward when it came to blocking DBs, so maybe his replacement will be better in that area. Or maybe we’ll line up all sixteen of our TEs and plow people over.
Marvin has already been replaced...
now we are looking for the number two spot. Reggie took over for Marvin a few years back. Nothing against Marvin, he has always been one of my favorites. And to find someone of his talent and caliber not run his mouth, not in this league. Only with the Colts. Reggie has had the best teacher in the business, and it shows. Unfortunatly, it’s time for the pupil to become the teacher, and for the teacher to retire. And let’s not forget, when you have the best in the business throwing to you, it’s hard not to become good. I’m so fired up about the upcoming season, what with our new D look, running game and coaches. Plus a healthy Peyton! Look out NFL, here come the COLTS!
mama said foosball is for the devil - 18forever
LBs will be fine
I am not sure why anyone is doubting our LB group… they were great last year and they were getting picked up by O Linemen on nearly every down. Now that we have guys who weigh more than 250lbs on the D-Line, I seriously doubt other teams will have that same penetration. They can finally be line “backers” rather than just additional underweight line men who weren’t down.
go horse!
CB tackling
Just want to mention that in terms of Marlin Jackson supposedly bennefiting from the new stout 7, dungy and polian have said in the past that in our cover 2 system it is completely normal for cb’s having to make many tackles
I'm aware...
That doesn’t change the fact that a stouter front 7 will decrease the load on the secondary.

by 




























