Finding the Winning Factors - Drive Success Rate
This week in the Finding the Winning Factors series, let's take a look at a not-so common Football Outsider stat: Drive Success Rate. The FO website didn't give a full definition on their website, but said to refer to Pro Football Prospectus 2005, where it was introduced. The Public Library came to the rescue, and I found exactly what they meant:
Drive Success Rate (or more precisely, series of downs success rate), or DSR, measures the likelihood that a team's offense will get another first down (or a touchdown, which the official NFL statisticians also count as a first down) in a given set of downs. And the equivalent defensive number measures how often a defense will allow another first down.
It confused me at first, as I thought they considered a drive "successful" with just 1 first down. But after reading this, it looks at each time a team has a first down, how often do they earn another one. My next challenge was to figure out the easiest way to calculate this. After thinking about for way too long, the simple answer finally came to me:
(First Downs + Pass TDs + Rush TDs) / (First Downs + Drives)**
**I don't know if this is the formula FO uses, because they didn't have that on their site. But it's the formula I used (and the numbers came out very close), so we're going with it.
I went back to 2001 to see how teams do. That means I'll be looking at 4,080 games over the past 8 years. I did this calculation for every game, then found the overall average for a game. I then went back and compared every game to this average, and found wins/losses based on being above or below average.
Let's get to the numbers:
- The Overall Average Drive Success Rate over the past 8 years is 69.1%. Does this mean that offenses are just really good at getting first downs, or the defenses aren't that good at stopping them?
- The Colts blow away the competition in this, with a DSR of 77.3%. The usual suspects are also high up there (Patriots, Chiefs, Chargers, and Broncos), making the top 5 teams in this category all teams from the AFC. Dominance anyone?
- Defensively, the Ravens are #1 again (they really have been as dominant on defense as the Colts have been on offense), with a DSR of only 63.5%. Even the best team can only stop an offense 36% of the time. The Colts come in at 30th, with a DSR of 71.6%. If the Colts can get back to "average", they'll have a scary good team.
- So how often do teams win when they are Above Average on Offense? 1308-658-1, which is 66.5%. That's the 2nd best record we've seen so far. DSR is looking really good for predicting games. Having an Above Average defense produces a record of 1381-729-3, which is 65.4%, which is a little worse than the offense. We haven't seen numbers like this since we looked at Adjusted Net Passing Yards / Attempt. Fantastic.
- When both the Offense and Defense are Above Average, their record is 742-90-1, or 89.14%. This ranks 1st out of 11 stats so far, which is unbelievable. I didn't think we could get better than ANPY/A, but we did. I guess those guys at FO know what they are doing, huh?
- The best game since 2001? Week 11 in 2007, where the Patriots had a DSR of 97.4% against the Bills. I remember that game, and it was ugly. Best game for the Colts offense? Week 4 in 2007 against the Broncos, where they had a DSR of 92.1%, 5th best game overall. Of the top 35 games, 11 are Colts games. Also, the top 42 games were all wins (the first loss was a Jaguars loss to the Colts, Week 13 of 2007), and those teams averaged 40.5 points / game.
-
The worst game since 2001? Week 16 in 2006, where the Vikings had a DSR of 20.0% against the Packers, a 9-7 loss. Tavaris Jackson at his best, and no Adrian Peterson. Only 104 total yards. Yeah, I'd say that was a bad, bad game. The Colts worst game (with Manning)? Week 12 in 2001, a 39-27 loss to the Ravens, where they had a DSR of 56.3%.
- The Colts have only had 21 games where they were below average in DSR, and were 11-10 in those games. This is by far the lowest number of games below average (the Patriots were 2nd with 37 games). That Manning guy is good.
- Two teams haven't lost since 2001 when their offense and defense are above average: the Falcons (22-0) and the Titans (19-0). Included in that Titans stat is the final game of 2007, when Kerry Collins put them in the playoffs against the Colts 2nd and 3rd team.
- I mentioned above that if the Colts could get to "average" on defense, this team would be scary good. How do they get there? They need to make just 2 stops / game to get back to 69.5%. That's it, only 2. The offense will be above average at least 12 games. If the defense can do the same, the Colts will win, period.
So what did we learn today? Drive Success Rate is the best stat we've looked at so far, and leads to a whole lot of wins. We also learned the Colts (like many of the other stats) are really good on offense, and really bad on defense.
I promised a table of all the stats we've looked at so far, and those we still have to look at. Here goes:
| Statistic | Average | Off Win% | Def Win % | Off/Def Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANPY/A | 5.338 | 70.3% | 70.7% | 89.10% |
| Yds/Play | 5.095 | 62.2% | 61.6% | 77.4% |
| RZ Eff | 65.6% | 59.3% | 60.6% | 69.7% |
| RB Success | 45.6% | 54.8% | 54.5% | 59.0% |
| Yds/Drive | 28.36 | 63.2% | 63.6% | 81.5% |
| ToP/Drive | 2:39.3 | 65.4% | 65.3% | 79.6% |
| DSR | 69.1% | 66.5% | 65.4% | 89.14% |
| Yds/Carry | 4.125 | 52.8% | 52.2% | 55.0% |
| 3rd/4th Down | 39.1% | 62.6% | 61.8% | 75.1% |
| Turnovers | ||||
| Avg Start Pos | 31.20 | 65.0% | 62.8% | 72.9% |
| Plays/Drive | ||||
| Net Punts Yds/Game | ||||
| Penalty Yds / Play | ||||
| First Downs/Drive | ||||
| 3 & Outs | 3.92 | 58.8% | 57.4% | 69.9% |
After the jump you'll see the offensive and defensive numbers for each team, as well as Win/Loss records when going above/below the league average. Click on the headers to sort. Here's a link to the last 5 years worth of data. There's not much of a difference, especially since it only took out 3 years worth of data.
Here are the Offensive and Defensive Numbers...
| Team | Offense | Defense | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Downs | Pass TDs | Rush TDs | Drives | DSR | 1st Downs | Pass TDs | Rush TDs | Drives | DSR | |
| Ravens | 2238 | 134 | 96 | 1507 | 65.9% | 2097 | 143 | 68 | 1537 | 63.5% |
| Buccaneers | 2247 | 154 | 84 | 1466 | 66.9% | 2076 | 149 | 70 | 1464 | 64.8% |
| Bears | 2094 | 136 | 91 | 1555 | 63.6% | 2332 | 147 | 90 | 1590 | 65.5% |
| Steelers | 2453 | 178 | 120 | 1429 | 70.9% | 2084 | 142 | 75 | 1425 | 65.6% |
| Eagles | 2406 | 202 | 105 | 1517 | 69.2% | 2270 | 140 | 81 | 1514 | 65.8% |
| Cowboys | 2333 | 178 | 100 | 1499 | 68.1% | 2219 | 172 | 91 | 1491 | 66.9% |
| Panthers | 2164 | 153 | 100 | 1510 | 65.8% | 2283 | 158 | 100 | 1504 | 67.1% |
| Redskins | 2283 | 152 | 89 | 1482 | 67.0% | 2237 | 159 | 97 | 1468 | 67.3% |
| Patriots | 2646 | 225 | 122 | 1395 | 74.1% | 2317 | 152 | 80 | 1431 | 68.0% |
| Packers | 2493 | 225 | 94 | 1488 | 70.6% | 2331 | 181 | 94 | 1496 | 68.1% |
| Dolphins | 2260 | 144 | 112 | 1479 | 67.3% | 2332 | 165 | 88 | 1459 | 68.2% |
| Giants | 2474 | 160 | 114 | 1478 | 69.5% | 2331 | 177 | 101 | 1485 | 68.4% |
| Jaguars | 2382 | 153 | 128 | 1412 | 70.2% | 2297 | 152 | 92 | 1401 | 68.7% |
| Broncos | 2620 | 177 | 123 | 1439 | 71.9% | 2285 | 150 | 120 | 1419 | 69.0% |
| Seahawks | 2540 | 183 | 122 | 1472 | 70.9% | 2445 | 170 | 99 | 1480 | 69.1% |
| Browns | 2077 | 153 | 62 | 1464 | 64.7% | 2422 | 155 | 108 | 1451 | 69.3% |
| Titans | 2332 | 157 | 115 | 1486 | 68.2% | 2357 | 193 | 107 | 1471 | 69.4% |
| Vikings | 2469 | 178 | 118 | 1458 | 70.4% | 2429 | 171 | 113 | 1447 | 70.0% |
| Chargers | 2458 | 190 | 158 | 1425 | 72.3% | 2489 | 189 | 101 | 1481 | 70.0% |
| Rams | 2504 | 184 | 100 | 1473 | 70.1% | 2391 | 170 | 133 | 1452 | 70.1% |
| Bills | 2209 | 137 | 93 | 1435 | 66.9% | 2389 | 155 | 126 | 1418 | 70.1% |
| Saints | 2520 | 204 | 111 | 1460 | 71.2% | 2382 | 198 | 108 | 1448 | 70.2% |
| Raiders | 2244 | 144 | 96 | 1449 | 67.3% | 2481 | 160 | 153 | 1470 | 70.7% |
| Cardinals | 2325 | 169 | 77 | 1474 | 67.7% | 2475 | 202 | 120 | 1479 | 70.7% |
| Jets | 2295 | 146 | 97 | 1340 | 69.8% | 2458 | 143 | 114 | 1365 | 71.0% |
| Falcons | 2294 | 140 | 125 | 1455 | 68.3% | 2490 | 184 | 127 | 1454 | 71.0% |
| 49ers | 2203 | 156 | 97 | 1486 | 66.6% | 2472 | 192 | 118 | 1442 | 71.1% |
| Bengals | 2428 | 175 | 95 | 1447 | 69.6% | 2486 | 196 | 112 | 1441 | 71.1% |
| Chiefs | 2598 | 170 | 163 | 1444 | 72.5% | 2524 | 178 | 131 | 1441 | 71.5% |
| Colts | 2811 | 255 | 121 | 1311 | 77.3% | 2399 | 148 | 124 | 1331 | 71.6% |
| Texans | 1905 | 115 | 86 | 1227 | 67.2% | 2216 | 172 | 103 | 1219 | 72.5% |
| Lions | 2130 | 146 | 71 | 1474 | 65.1% | 2639 | 210 | 141 | 1462 | 72.9% |
| Total | 75435 | 5373 | 3385 | 46436 | 69.1% | 75435 | 5373 | 3385 | 46436 | 69.1% |
Here are the Win/Loss records of teams when they go above/below average:
| Team | Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Above Average | Below Average | Above Average | Below Average | |||||||||||||
| Win | Loss | Tie | Pct | Win | Loss | Tie | Pct | Win | Loss | Tie | Pct | Win | Loss | Tie | Pct | |
| Patriots | 77 | 14 | 0 | 0.846 | 20 | 17 | 0 | 0.541 | 64 | 5 | 0 | 0.928 | 33 | 26 | 0 | 0.559 |
| Steelers | 57 | 13 | 1 | 0.810 | 28 | 29 | 0 | 0.491 | 59 | 18 | 1 | 0.763 | 26 | 24 | 0 | 0.520 |
| Colts | 80 | 27 | 0 | 0.748 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0.524 | 43 | 8 | 0 | 0.843 | 48 | 29 | 0 | 0.623 |
| Chargers | 53 | 24 | 0 | 0.688 | 18 | 33 | 0 | 0.353 | 45 | 19 | 0 | 0.703 | 26 | 38 | 0 | 0.406 |
| Packers | 50 | 22 | 0 | 0.694 | 25 | 31 | 0 | 0.446 | 47 | 17 | 0 | 0.734 | 28 | 36 | 0 | 0.438 |
| Cowboys | 46 | 14 | 0 | 0.767 | 20 | 48 | 0 | 0.294 | 48 | 32 | 0 | 0.600 | 18 | 30 | 0 | 0.375 |
| Eagles | 52 | 13 | 0 | 0.800 | 29 | 33 | 1 | 0.468 | 60 | 23 | 1 | 0.720 | 21 | 23 | 0 | 0.477 |
| Ravens | 29 | 19 | 0 | 0.604 | 42 | 38 | 0 | 0.525 | 62 | 32 | 0 | 0.660 | 9 | 25 | 0 | 0.265 |
| Seahawks | 50 | 27 | 0 | 0.649 | 21 | 30 | 0 | 0.412 | 47 | 15 | 0 | 0.758 | 24 | 42 | 0 | 0.364 |
| Jets | 42 | 23 | 0 | 0.646 | 20 | 43 | 0 | 0.317 | 37 | 21 | 0 | 0.638 | 25 | 45 | 0 | 0.357 |
| Broncos | 51 | 22 | 0 | 0.699 | 23 | 32 | 0 | 0.418 | 49 | 22 | 0 | 0.690 | 25 | 32 | 0 | 0.439 |
| Rams | 44 | 29 | 0 | 0.603 | 16 | 39 | 0 | 0.291 | 41 | 25 | 0 | 0.621 | 19 | 43 | 0 | 0.306 |
| Dolphins | 32 | 17 | 0 | 0.653 | 29 | 50 | 0 | 0.367 | 43 | 27 | 0 | 0.614 | 18 | 40 | 0 | 0.310 |
| Panthers | 33 | 13 | 0 | 0.717 | 31 | 51 | 0 | 0.378 | 47 | 27 | 0 | 0.635 | 17 | 37 | 0 | 0.315 |
| Bears | 25 | 7 | 0 | 0.781 | 44 | 52 | 0 | 0.458 | 56 | 31 | 0 | 0.644 | 14 | 27 | 0 | 0.341 |
| Giants | 40 | 23 | 0 | 0.635 | 28 | 37 | 0 | 0.431 | 44 | 21 | 0 | 0.677 | 24 | 39 | 0 | 0.381 |
| Titans | 35 | 18 | 0 | 0.660 | 35 | 40 | 0 | 0.467 | 48 | 15 | 0 | 0.762 | 22 | 43 | 0 | 0.338 |
| Falcons | 45 | 16 | 0 | 0.738 | 17 | 49 | 1 | 0.261 | 37 | 16 | 0 | 0.698 | 25 | 49 | 1 | 0.340 |
| Buccaneers | 36 | 12 | 0 | 0.750 | 30 | 50 | 0 | 0.375 | 54 | 35 | 0 | 0.607 | 12 | 27 | 0 | 0.308 |
| Saints | 43 | 28 | 0 | 0.606 | 17 | 40 | 0 | 0.298 | 40 | 21 | 0 | 0.656 | 20 | 47 | 0 | 0.299 |
| Chiefs | 46 | 31 | 0 | 0.597 | 13 | 38 | 0 | 0.255 | 30 | 19 | 0 | 0.612 | 29 | 50 | 0 | 0.367 |
| Vikings | 39 | 24 | 0 | 0.619 | 22 | 43 | 0 | 0.338 | 44 | 22 | 0 | 0.667 | 17 | 45 | 0 | 0.274 |
| Bills | 27 | 22 | 0 | 0.551 | 25 | 54 | 0 | 0.316 | 39 | 21 | 0 | 0.650 | 13 | 55 | 0 | 0.191 |
| Jaguars | 44 | 24 | 0 | 0.647 | 18 | 42 | 0 | 0.300 | 41 | 22 | 0 | 0.651 | 21 | 44 | 0 | 0.323 |
| Browns | 25 | 11 | 0 | 0.694 | 24 | 68 | 0 | 0.261 | 35 | 36 | 0 | 0.493 | 14 | 43 | 0 | 0.246 |
| 49ers | 32 | 21 | 0 | 0.604 | 21 | 54 | 0 | 0.280 | 34 | 25 | 0 | 0.576 | 20 | 49 | 0 | 0.290 |
| Bengals | 39 | 26 | 0 | 0.600 | 15 | 47 | 1 | 0.246 | 34 | 19 | 1 | 0.639 | 20 | 54 | 0 | 0.270 |
| Redskins | 32 | 22 | 0 | 0.593 | 26 | 48 | 0 | 0.351 | 45 | 30 | 0 | 0.600 | 13 | 40 | 0 | 0.245 |
| Cardinals | 33 | 24 | 0 | 0.579 | 16 | 55 | 0 | 0.225 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0.500 | 21 | 51 | 0 | 0.292 |
| Raiders | 30 | 20 | 0 | 0.600 | 15 | 63 | 0 | 0.192 | 30 | 28 | 0 | 0.517 | 15 | 55 | 0 | 0.214 |
| Texans | 24 | 31 | 0 | 0.436 | 16 | 41 | 0 | 0.281 | 30 | 21 | 0 | 0.588 | 10 | 51 | 0 | 0.164 |
| Lions | 17 | 21 | 0 | 0.447 | 14 | 76 | 0 | 0.156 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 0.417 | 11 | 69 | 0 | 0.138 |
| Total | 1308 | 658 | 1 | 0.665 | 729 | 1381 | 3 | 0.346 | 1381 | 729 | 3 | 0.654 | 658 | 1308 | 1 | 0.335 |
And finally, Win/Loss records when the offense is above average, and the defense holds the other team below average:
| Team | Above Average | Below Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win | Loss | Tie | Pct | Win | Loss | Tie | Pct | |
| Falcons | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 0.069 |
| Titans | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 0.194 |
| Patriots | 47 | 1 | 0 | 0.979 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 0.188 |
| Eagles | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0.970 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0.083 |
| Jets | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.952 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 0.115 |
| Panthers | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.952 | 4 | 25 | 0 | 0.138 |
| Bears | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0.944 | 5 | 22 | 0 | 0.185 |
| Chargers | 29 | 2 | 0 | 0.935 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0.111 |
| Buccaneers | 27 | 2 | 0 | 0.931 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 0.150 |
| Cowboys | 30 | 3 | 0 | 0.909 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 0.095 |
| Steelers | 32 | 3 | 1 | 0.903 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0.067 |
| Jaguars | 25 | 3 | 0 | 0.893 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 0.080 |
| Colts | 33 | 4 | 0 | 0.892 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0.143 |
| Packers | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0.889 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0.105 |
| Broncos | 32 | 4 | 0 | 0.889 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 0.300 |
| Lions | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0.889 | 2 | 49 | 0 | 0.039 |
| Vikings | 23 | 3 | 0 | 0.885 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0.040 |
| Seahawks | 28 | 4 | 0 | 0.875 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 0.095 |
| Chiefs | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0.875 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 0.154 |
| Browns | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0.875 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 0.081 |
| Cardinals | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0.867 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 0.033 |
| 49ers | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0.857 | 5 | 32 | 0 | 0.135 |
| Bills | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0.857 | 4 | 36 | 0 | 0.100 |
| Rams | 28 | 5 | 0 | 0.848 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 0.136 |
| Dolphins | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0.833 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 0.182 |
| Saints | 25 | 5 | 0 | 0.833 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 0.077 |
| Bengals | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0.833 | 1 | 32 | 0 | 0.030 |
| Ravens | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0.828 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0.267 |
| Texans | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0.824 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Redskins | 22 | 5 | 0 | 0.815 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 0.115 |
| Raiders | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0.810 | 2 | 39 | 0 | 0.049 |
| Giants | 20 | 5 | 0 | 0.800 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 0.160 |
| Total | 742 | 90 | 1 | 0.891 | 90 | 742 | 1 | 0.109 |
2 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Best of the series yet!
I’ve always loved the DSR page at FO, and the Colts have always dominated that page—their O is often so dominant that they rank very highly in the combined/net DSR stats as well..
And what you said about average D is only a portion of it (and I have been harping on this for at least a year now): Remember that Manning and Co have the highest DSR on O, but that is with the fewest drives in the league over that span. So an average D not only stops the opponents once or twice more a game (one good DT and we’re there! 1.5 more third down stops per game! It’s not much.) it gives Manning & Co the ball 24 more times a season. What can the most efficient O do with the ball 24 more times a season?
A
LOT
OF
DAMAGE
An average D makes this team very very dangerous. A good D means the oppoonents, even the better ones, must be both good and lucky to beat them. Think how lucky SD was in the playoffs against us last year when EVERYTHING broke their way and they still needed OT to win. Now imagine if we forced one more punt instead of giving up another short field TD to them… no OT. And that was a team without Brackett, missing 1 starting CB, and with 3 DTs fewer than we’ll have going into 09.
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Jul 2, 2009 12:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sad to think we're on the back side of Peyton's career
and still hoping for a defense to give him respectable field time. The haters will never acknowledge this factor. I hope he gets the extra help this season.
by coltsfanawalt on Jul 2, 2009 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IT'S GOTTA HAPPEN SOMETIME
If he’s NOT on the “second nine” of his career, then he is a Ripkenesque freak. I doubt another 7 seaons could happen, but five…? Maybe. However, I assume he’ll want to move on to other things in a few years. Business, politics, philanthropy, curing cancer… I wonder if they’re putting off starting a family because of lack of time in his current role.
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Jul 2, 2009 4:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Peyton doesn't strike me as the kind of guy
who “moves on to other things”. The guy eats, sleeps, and breathes football. I would be shocked if he doesn’t immediately go into coaching after his retirement. Pure stats says he’s on the second half of his career, but he was league MVP last year. Hard to think he’s within spitting distance of hanging them up.
by slash196 on Jul 2, 2009 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't imagine life without Peyton under center.
I’ve seen some Bills games where Jim Kelly was still on the sidelines cheering for them. I can picture Peyton doing that for the Colts. But I believe it’s going to be a long time from now, The man is a freak of nature when it comes to taking care of himself and working out. When he’s not out there single handedly saving children from childhood obesity, he’s thinking this: football, football, football………
"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
by Indy Lori on Jul 2, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another thing DSR tells us...
is that the Colts more than anyone else in the NFL should rarely punt. (Yes I subscribe to the TMQ school of thought on limited punting). The stats say even an average team in terms of DSR should rarely punt. I’m guessing with the Colts high DSR they should punt in far less circumstances than an average team.
by Rob-Westside on Jul 2, 2009 10:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed in general on punting league-wide
and for us in particular.
One issue is that the team would have to be mentally prepared if that is their game plan—hey, we may not make it and the D has to be ready to step up. If it is woven into fabric of the game and not a one-time deperation event (i.e. we have to make this 4th down to win the game) they should adapt.
A big “pro” is that it puts your foot on the opponent’s throat and makes them desperate. If they know you will never let up, damn, talk about a morale killer. Who can forget Jeff Fisher, hopelessly outmanned, starting a game with an on-side KO and kicking two more that game? Desperate teams make mistakes.
One obstacle is that if everybody starts doing it, the game will fundamentally change and you might not have the advantage anymore. Well, as long as 18 is there, we’ll have at least the same advntage we have on every other down. But until a good portion of the league does it, our WRs will actually find a cushion on 3rd and 5 and gladly take a 4 yard gain that will be given to them as a mental mistake because we KNOW we have one more shot, but the D is used to playing the other 15 games and all their practices against a team that has lost the battle when they only gain 4 on 3rd and 5.
It might keep Scifres out of a game!
Anything that pushes that turd into early retirement and obscurity is okay with me. Let’s see him brag in 30 years to a roomful of youth football players. “I was a punter on the Chargers and single-handedly won a playoff game with my foot.” “Uh, mister, what’s a punter?” I am dancing a little dance of joy at the very prospect.
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Jul 2, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Punting
Yeah, but if you go for it on 4th down and fail it is a morale crushing event. Really takes the wind out of a teams sails.
by MasterRWayne on Jul 2, 2009 10:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Only 2 more stops per game, huh?
With the “tweaks” to the D its gonna happen this year boys and girls. I am SO freakin’ excited for this season!!
This has been a great series, thanks much!
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Jul 2, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i’m on vacation so i’m a little late to the party, but way to go mgrex03. this was a fantastic article!
by saintnixon on Jul 3, 2009 3:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
























