Madden 10 Colts revealed
The official player ratings for Madden 10 have been revealed over on ESPN.
http://espn.go.com/videogames/features/madden/madden10?teamId=10
We'll go through a couple of the more notable ones; who gets props and who gets snubbed?
For those of you who may not know, this years Madden has been ratings-adjusted, to counteract the "ratings inflation" that has been going on. In years past, a player that might have been an 83 would now be around a 75. A player that might have been a 70 will now be in the 55 range. So keep in mind that, unlike in past years, a rating in the mid-to-high 70s is not necessarily a bad rating. These players won't be elite, but they won't be utterly horrible either.
With that out of the way, lets get into it.
The Studs
1. Peyton Manning - 99 overall, 99 throw accuracy
Pretty hard to argue with this one.
2. Reggie Wayne/Dallas Clark - 95/91 overall, 98/92 catch
All good here, Clark and Wayne are both studs with elite hands.
3. Freeney/Mathis/Brock - 94/92/85 overall
EA gives Mathis the love he deserves, but also surprising to see Brock with such a high rating. Freeney is a beast, as usual.
4. Gary Brackett - 82 overall, 91 tackle
As one of the most underrated players in the league, it's surprising to see Brackett getting his due here. He's completely crucial to the middle of our D.
5. Sanders/Bethea/Hayden/Jackson - 95/88/87/82 overall
Much love for a fierce Colts secondary. They should be one of the top units in the game.
6. Jeff Saturday - 93 overall
Saturday gets his due as well, he should be a force in the running game. The O-line as a whole is pretty solid, all above 80 (except for a certain lineman whose name rhymes with "Hugo").
The Snubs
1. Anthony Gonzalez - 75 overall, 84 catch
Given his raw numbers, a person who has never seen Gonzo's DVOA could be forgiven for thinking he's a middling receiver. EA is going to look very silly in about three months.
2. Joseph Addai - 85 overall, 66 toughness
Wow, sure didn't take Addai long to get the "brittle" label. Still, an 85 ain't peanuts, but if you like Addai it would probably be best to play with injuries off.
3. The Linebackers
Brackett gets props, everyone else gets the shaft. Besides Brackett, no Colts backer rates above a 65. Even with the new system, those are pretty weak numbers.
4. Tony Ugoh - 76 overall
Put it this way: Charlie Johnson is five points higher than him.
5. Melvin Bullitt - 64 overall, 65 tackle
Anyone who watched Bullitt last year could not possible come to the conclusion that the colts were 30 "Madden Points" worse with him in the game for Sanders.
The ???
1. Ed Johnson - not listed
I would hope that EA would be on top of this, it was a fairly early move and it's very important to the Colts as a team. He may be in the game as a free agent (Marv will be, as well, so everyone who wants to see the Colts with 88 this season will need to buy Madden. Rumor has it he's a very respectable 84).
2. Austin Collie - 68 overall/Pierre Garcon - 54 overall
Maybe Collie's college numbers skew this. Either way, the only people who have seen Garcon in real action are the coaches, and they love him.
3. Curtis Painter - 68 overall/Jim Sorgi - 47 overall
We all love to rag on the Clipboard, but the fact is he's thrown 8 TDs and only one pick in his limited action, whereas Curtis Painter has never played a snap, and will be lucky to make the practice squad. Madden has a pretty strong "rookie bias", whereby unproven players are more or less given the benefit of the doubt. That's clearly in play here.
Later today, the official EA site will have the full spreadsheets, as well as some screens of our virtual Colts in action. That can be found here:
http://maddennfl.easports.com/cover.action
That's it for my take. What do you see that you love? What do you see that you hate?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Session got a 65 or lower?
that’s terrible. Bad EA.
That’s less excusable than Bullit since Session was in the lineup last year.
That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"
I get the feeling it's a "balance" thing
The Colts are so stacked everywhere else, they had to screw them over somewhere.
good point
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
That's why I love XBL
I can’t wait to see some of those ratings adjusted as the season progresses. Gonzo shouldn’t stay that low for long. Hopefully Donald Brown turns out to be a stud too.
Also, does anyone else get annoyed that Madden 09 always puts Reggie on the right side? You’d think by now they’d know that it isn’t a 1st string thing and that Reg stays on the left. It always bugs me.
Sorgi's OVR
is a little low in my opinion. He should be high 50s low 60s. But I agree with the Painter rating. Call me Bias, but I watched him all 5 years at Purdue, and I believe he is a better QB than Sorgi is. He may not know the play book yet, but he has a stronger arm than Sorgi does and came from a school know for it’s passing offense. Everyone thinks Painter isn’t good, because most have only seen his Senior year, where he had not much talent around him to throw to. His best recievers were Desmond Tardy, Greg Orton, and Kory Sheets(RB).
by 7_Painter's_First_Fan on Jul 15, 2009 11:27 AM EDT reply actions
What is the Colts overall rating?
Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte
by LV Steelers Fan on Jul 15, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions
88 overall
the highest rated team is the pats at 93
by metal_militia on Jul 15, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
OK, thanks
The Steelers are at 92 with 5 defensive players over 90. I think the Colts are a bit underrated, but that’s what roster updates are for!
Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte
by LV Steelers Fan on Jul 15, 2009 10:33 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
if they added Ed and fixed Session/Bullitt's ratings the Colts would probably be about right
I’ll also be giving Ugoh and Gonzo a significant bump when I get the game.
That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"
by shake n bake on Jul 15, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
The Steelers have some players who'll shoot up, too
Namely, Timmons and Gay, who are both starters on defense with ratings of somewhere between 65 and 75. Stupid EA couldn’t be bothered to check that Gay was the highest rated corner in the NFL last year and that Timmons got 65 tackles and 5 sacks during limited playing time. I’ll be doing some custom roster updates when I get the game.
Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte
by LV Steelers Fan on Jul 16, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions
th ratings this year are very harsh for every team and player
players you think will have high speed ratings or strength ratings are a lot lower that they used to be. Im guessing EA wanted to make it as close to the rea thing as possible.
why
is adam v not in ur snubs section? a 79? really?
Please, please draft a big Defensive Tackle. Please?
Enter Fili Moala. Thank you Polian
I can live with bad linebackers. I can live with Sorgi being lower than I expected. I can live with bullit getting screwed-over. But Adam v? an effing 79? what the HELL?!?!
by Colts_and_Cavs_in_09! on Jul 15, 2009 2:55 PM EDT reply actions
He's got great kick power and accuracy
I think the low rating must be something like toughness or age or something. He should still be a fine kicker.
I don't get the kicker rankings at all
The Steelers kicker, Jeff Reed, is rated at 76 despite being one of the most accurate kickers in NFL history. On top of that, he plays half of his games at Heinz Field, the toughest stadium for kickers in the league. I refuse to believe that Reed is 20 points below Bironas.
Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte
by LV Steelers Fan on Jul 15, 2009 10:37 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I always thought that
the Giants/Jets stadium is the toughest one for kickers. Buffalo should be up there as well.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Snails can sleep for three years at a time.
Maybe
But no one has ever kicked a field goal of over 50 yards at Heinz. In fact, that mark has only ever been reached twice. Speaking of the wind at Giants Stadium, a Giants fan told me during a Ben vs Eli debate that once the Giants moved into their new stadium, everyone would realize that Eli was the best Manning. 0_o
Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte
by LV Steelers Fan on Jul 16, 2009 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Eli better than Peyton?
Never gonna happen.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Snails can sleep for three years at a time.
Those NY'ers
can be somewhat delusional at times….but still not as bad as the Pats’ fans. heh heh heh
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Jul 16, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Its a shame, but
You can’t expect Madden to get everything right. The truth is that if the colts draft a rookie free agent linebacker and teach him for three years, Madden is still going to have him rated at 55. But once the linebacker starts for a season, he’s playing good enough to be a 75. After a few years it starts all over again. (Remember Madden 04 and David Thornton? he was a 64). There is also Nick Harper in Madden 04 and Jeff Saturday was only a 74. The colts will NEVER be the best Madden team, maybe on offense, but they will not dominate the way the Falcons of Madden 06 did.
~ my two cents :) ~
by Colts_and_Cavs_in_09! on Jul 18, 2009 7:41 PM EDT reply actions

by 













