I don't want to hear Bob Kravitz or any other ESPN hack lecture me about journalistic integrity ever again
Wait!
What's this? ESPN has posted a story about a civil suit involving an NFL player even though there are no criminal charges filed? I thought their policy was not to report on civil suits. I guess the network's lame and nearly laughable excuse for ignoring the Ben Roethlisberger rape lawsuit last week was as vapid and empty as it sounded.
The ESPN article linked above is about Marvin Harrison getting sued by another person with a sketchy background. It was written by Shaun Assael, the same hack who co-wrote this hit piece on Harrison back in January that we blasted. It is one of many articles written about players involved in civil cases that do not have criminal charges attached. It also cuts to the core of the OMG IT'S SO OBVIOUS hypocrisy at ESPN. Clearly, if you are important (and perhaps white, male, and Caucasian), the bosses upstairs will protect you. If not, well... they may feed you to their stable of hacks, like Shaun Assael.
I don't make a habit of reading the NY Daily News, but recently I read Bob Raismann's column on ESPN. To say that Raismann eviscerates ESPN in this column is an understatement. The man disembowels the network, and afterward he throws the network's bloody guts in the faces of the "journalists" who work for the "World Wide Leader" [emphasis mine]:
When a genius in Bristol created that "Worldwide Leader" moniker, he was not referring to the worldwide leader in journalism. ESPN is, was, and always will be an entertainment company, more show biz than news biz....
Throughout its multimedia platforms - TV, radio, magazine, Web site - ESPN employs many people: Columnists, talk-radio screamers, investigative reporters (who could have looked into the allegations in this civil suit) and analysts working in broadcast booths. Yet, with one command, one "don't dare report this," they all shutup.
They now all must live with one perception: They are puppets.
Wow.
Fine folks like Paul Kuharsky, please take note. When stuff like the ESPN-Roethlisberger incident happens, and you do nothing, you are no longer "journalists" or "bloggers." You are corporate drones. Your integrity and professional standards mean absolutely nothing to the rest of us when you stand by and allow this kind of corporate hackery to take place without protest. I realize we all gotta work, and times are tough. But if you hold yourself to a standard, you must stand by that standard even when times are tough. Otherwise, the standard is meaningless and empty.
ESPN's AFC North "blogger," James Walker, did not "blog" anything about the Roethlisberger suit when the news broke. Why? ESPN corporate executives likely told him not to, and Walker (like a good ESPN employee) did what he was told. A responsible journalist would have resigned under protest, or posted the news anyway and leaked it to other blogs. Would Walker have been fired for doing so? Probably. Would he still be considered a journalist today? Absolutely.
However, Walker likely did what his meal ticket told him to do, which was bury the story regardless of whether it compromised his journalists "standards" or not. I know I personally will no longer take Walker seriously as a writer or a journalist, and if other bloggers in my network do, God help them.
I know some of you may question whether ESPN and their docile, "ostrich journalists" deserves to get blasted mercilessly for their corporate hackery brought fully into the light? The answer is yes. Absolutely! It was a little more than two months ago that I had to go onto an ESPN-affiliate radio station and defend blogging against ESPN employees "journalists" who claimed they were "better" because they were "accountable" and had "standards." And did the "journalist" who lectured me on that show make a big fuss when his meal ticket decided to bury a significant story because it would hurt Ben Roethlisberger? No, of course not. He stood in the back of the room and did nothing, clutching his paycheck like a good little drone.
Standards, my left nut.
As a sports blogger, I fight on a daily basis against many of these petty, pretentious, uppity hacks like Bob Kravitz and his ESPN buddies. I'm told our brand of media is amateur while their brand is professional because they adhere to a code. So, when I see these same sanctimonious pricks lay down and hide when journalistic ethics have been broken, I unleash my hounds. I do what they seem unable or unwilling to do.
I hold them to their own standard, and shove right back into their fat faces the same crap they dump on us bloggers.
Also worth noting, if you (as a journalist) call out the "Worldwide Leader" for its unethical practices, they will ban you. Seriously. They will shut you out tell you not to show up to their "Cool Kids Club." They've banned over 100 individuals because they did something that the network disagrees with:
The network's banning of individuals (and now entire media organizations) who do something with which the network disagrees has also now reached ridiculous numbers. According to several people at ESPN, there are as many as 100 people -- mostly journalists -- who have either been banned or are currently banned by ESPN. The number could be higher.
Again, if you are a serious journalist and are still working for this network, quit. No journalist with any kind of integrity would work for such a heinous entity. If you remain working for these corporate "Orwellians," don't call yourself a journalist anymore, because God knows we won't consider you one.
You've voided that title in exchange for a nice paycheck.
[UPDATE]: Apparently, now former-ESPN radio employee Dale Hansen is "no puppet." Via The Big Lead:
Last week, [Hansen] spent 20 minutes on air talking about the rape allegations against Pittsburgh Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger. No, he didn’t get the memo. Well, at a commercial break he did. After the show, he penned his letter of resignation.
Read Hansen's resignation letter, which states, "I don’t want to be identified with being one of ESPN’s puppets. I refuse to be anybody’s puppet."
Will Kravitz and Eddie, who apparently have "standards" that they follow, join Dan Hansen by quitting their jobs? Doubtful. Unlike Hansen, Kravitz and Eddie are corporate puppets. The word standard is spelled for them "$tandard."
4 recs |
30 comments
|
Comments
Side note
I know some here are likely a bit annoyed that I’m harping on ESPN. But it was not a fun experience having to go on that radio show and listen to those jack asses lecture me about journalism. Now, when their “ethics” are put to the test, they back down. Unbelievable.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on Jul 28, 2009 11:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"Standards, my left nut."
Made me LOL while at work…
Dun nuh nuh nuhhhh!!!! Super Mathis
by hoosier in sodak on Jul 28, 2009 11:29 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I did the same with "ostrich journalists"
classic
How can you not love a team that does this?
by LovinBlue on Jul 28, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice rant, BBS.
I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, so to speak. I’ve just come to accept the fact that ESPN is a joke. They are, indeed, in show business as opposed to news business. Heck, I’m just grateful that Favre doesn’t have his own ticker heading this summer.
The fact that they don’t like the Colts is obvious. On the ticker on ESPN “News” they mis-reported the Moore/Mudd story basically saying that they “may” return as consultants, but since the Colts had not issued a press release to that fact they (ESPN) couldn’t confirm it. Why golly gee, I could have sworn that Irsay already made it pretty darn clear that both would be returning…he was just waiting for the NFL to make clear how they could perform their duties.
It cracks me up. I work a minimum of 40 hours per week, and I am better informed than people who get paid 6-7 figures who actually do this for a living. Amazing.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Jul 28, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
exactly
Media has become such a big business that the idea of integrity is gone with the profit figures. And big media conglomerates are the worst because they control so much of the market they CAN make a story or bury it. This is why they hate bloggers, it is competition… and competition that they can’t buy up or put out of business.
An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...
by bluegirl on Jul 28, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually
In a case like that, they’re actually trying to play responsible journalist and wait for an official confirmation.
This runs contrary to just about everything else they do, like publishing unfounded rumors, spreading news by reporters whose only sources are agents, and airing stories about civil complaints one week after they say it’s their policy not to do that… but I can hardly fault them for that.
You’re never better informed than they are. They hear everything. They simply make inconsistent and usually bad choices on how and when to report it.
by willyduer on Jul 28, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My point is
that it was announced a month ago that Moore and Mudd would be returning as consultants. Is there really a need for another confirmation?
And, yes, I believe that I am better informed, in as far as the Colts are concerned at least, than they are. Between SB, 18to88 and The IndyFootball Report I have no doubt that my information is more accurate and more plentiful than ESPNs.
But I will agree that their choices are inconsistent at best.
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Jul 28, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not trying to stick up for ESPN or anything...
I believe you’re more informed reading these sites than you would be if you only read ESPN. That’s easy.
But ESPN, with their army of people with access to various league and team sources, gets much more information than they can ever report.
I guess Oehser really narrows that gap, though.
Of course, ESPN has a bunch of morons writing and broadcasting for them, and even former NFL players subscribe to outdated and moronic common fan logic in many cases (ie attributing playoff losses to Peyton choking and saying they’d rather have Ben Roethlisberger at QB), so there’s no real need to ever use them to inform yourself. But I’d bet there are very few things that have ever been reported here on the web that ESPN didn’t at least know about first.
by willyduer on Jul 28, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If ESPN is show-biz, then so is NFL.com.
More often than not, when I go to NFL.com, what do I see? Mostly the same faces over and over. They just can’t get enough of T.O. and the patriots. BBS, so the “legitimate” journalists don’t like you? Well, I think they are just scared stiff. The on-line sites like SB are slowly but surely taking their jobs.
"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
by Indy Lori on Jul 28, 2009 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Traditional-media bitching at bloggers is hilarious
Bloggers do what traditional media does, only for free and with passion. There’s nothing CNN can do that a guy sitting in his basement can’t do, and there’s a hell of a lot that Mr. Basement can do that CNN can’t, for fear of upsetting its shareholders or Very Serious Authority Figures. It’s the same with sports news as anything else.
One point I will make, and that’s this: I have never labored under the illusion that ESPN is a journalistic organization. Sports are basically games, trivial forms of entertainment. ESPN does trivial commentary on trivialities. I don’t hold them to the same standard as the NY Times (although that’s not saying much). They have funny personalities and the highlights on Monday morning. If they want to clamp down on a story, that’s their prerogative, I suppose. Now, the Marvin/civil suit hypocrisy, that’s another kettle of fish.
by slash196 on Jul 28, 2009 12:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec, rec….
Seriously, why can I only rec this once? I’ve actually managed to cut ESPN out of my life entirely, (well ok, I do check in on Paul Kuharsky still) and it’s been surprisingly easy to do. the blogs I subscribe to give me more insightful commentary and more comprehensive news reporting than I ever got from the WWL.
by Maedhros on Jul 28, 2009 12:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Update
Apparently, now former-ESPN radio employee Dale Hansen is “no puppet.” Via The Big Lead:
Last week, [Hansen] spent 20 minutes on air talking about the rape allegations against Pittsburgh Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger. No, he didn’t get the memo. Well, at a commercial break he did. After the show, he penned his letter of resignation.
Read Hansen’s resignation letter, which states, “I don’t want to be identified with being one of ESPN’s puppets. I refuse to be anybody’s puppet.”
Will Kravitz and Eddie, who apparently have “standards” that they follow, join Dan Hansen by quitting their jobs? Doubtful. Unlike Hansen, Kravitz and Eddie are corporate puppets. The word standard is spelled for them “$tandard.”
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on Jul 28, 2009 12:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hard to argue...
but Kravitz and Eddie don’t work for ESPN. They work for Emmis communications, not for ESPN. To my knowledge, local affiliate shows are not bound in any way by ESPN corporate policy.
I may be wrong about that.
The rest of the rant is valid, but if they could have decided to talk about the story if they wanted to. To my knowledge they were under no corporate ban.
18to88.com
by deshawn zombie on Jul 28, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dale Hansen
He worked at ESPN radio in Dallas, which seems very similar to Indianapolis’ ESPN-affiliate. So, if Hansen got the memo, Kravitz and Eddie likely got it as well.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on Jul 28, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could be...
I have no direct knowledge of it either way.
You just have to leave open the possibility that they weren’t under the ban. I imagine there might be play in the rules between affiliates and/or the autonomy of each show.
Then again maybe not. Just get some verification on it before slamming them. I don’t give a rats butt about those guys, but your rant is dead on…just want to make sure its 100% accurate because if not it hurts the cred of what you very rightly say.
I wonder if 1070 The Fan has an official comment? Has anyone tried to write them for a comment on the story?
18to88.com
by deshawn zombie on Jul 28, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you're right DZ
ESPN itself only directly owns and oversees the Chicago (AM 1000), Dallas (103.3 FM), Pittsburgh (1250 AM), and Los Angeles (710 AM) stations. i think their blanket of control would only directly affect those stations.
i’m not sure if stations that aren’t under their direct ownership, and instead just affiliated with ESPN, would be subject to their corporate rules like the Roethlisberger gag order.
by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Jul 28, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
forgot to add 1050 in NY to that list
by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Jul 28, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kent Sterling, program manager:
We are an independent radio station regardless of our affiliation with any network. While my position allows me the authority to mandate talent to talk about a topic, I’ve never exercised it. Nor would I ever anticipate the need to do so.
Kravitz & Eddie and Dan Dakich are smart guys. They are trusted to use the discretion to determine what topics to feature. ESPN has no power to affect that, nor have they ever attempted to.
18to88.com
by deshawn zombie on Jul 29, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hansen
When I lived in DFW for the past two years, and I listened to 103.3 every day. I liked Hansen, I hardly agreed with his opinions, but you could tell that they were indeed his opinions. I applaud him for taking this action and hope that The Ticket picks up his excellent show. Such integrity should be rewarded. I hope that Galloway follows suit, as he has significant clout at one of the flagship ESPN stations and his show pulls in significant ratings.
I also wish I had time and motivation to blog at Speed Blue Nation
by Bullard47 on Jul 28, 2009 3:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
This is entirely worth the fight, but...
we need to be fighting in a more balanced manner.
ESPN sucks. It’s susceptible to the kind of petty, local, populist prejudices that define the tabloid rags. Evidently Polian hasn’t given them enough face time, or execs at Dallas, Philly, New England, and Pittsburgh are giving them more than anyone else can compete with. The hyperbolic charges against Marvin Harrison and the lips-sealed hypocrisy of the Roethlisberger reporting stink of the Northeast’s traditional intolerance of everything west of the Appalachians. The kind of rivalry we had in the Knicks-Pacers series of the 90’s is a good example.
But we also need to confront some facts and adjust our protests accordingly. Ballistics show that 4 of the bullets fired at Dixon (or is it Nixon?) came from Harrison’s rare armor-busting Belgian gun. More than that, I don’t know. I’m not about to make the kind of accusations Assael and Keating made in their article. But we need to come to grips with the fact that our heroes aren’t the innocents we make them out to be.
The problem with ESPN is that it operates along such binaries. Easy rags-to-riches or riches-to-rags storylines. Who gets the good treatment and who gets the bad is pretty arbitrary. The Roethlisberger-Harrison comparison is a perfect example. But the great travesty of ESPN reporting is its inability to get beyond the results of the games themselves and report on anything but the end score. They’re spending millions to validate the leagues they cover. You think the Super Bowl winner isn’t always the best team in the league? We’ll show you Tom Brady is God and Bill Belichick himself walks on water and imply that you should’ve known better. You think maybe we’ve been covering the Manning-is-a-choker story all wrong, and that the Brady-Manning debate isn’t decided by comparing Super Bowls rings? Here’s Sal Paolantonio to impugn the quality of Super Bowl XLI and, oh, by the way Sal, go milk that Harrison gun case for all it’s worth.
We buy into their coverage when we insist on the lily-white innocence of our guys and make Brett Favre into the symbol of all that’s wrong with the world. BBS, I think too much effort is spent defending Marvin as a saint rather than keeping the focus on ESPN’s hacks and the hit jobs they’ve put out on guys who don’t validate their preferred storylines. Marvin sure as hell doesn’t deserve the kind of unrelenting, skeptical, snide, insinuating coverage he’s gotten from the Worldwide Leader. We need to keep the conversation about ESPN’s hyperbole and its sinister agenda rather than the absolute innocence of the guys they crucify.
by CooperManningsNotTrying on Jul 28, 2009 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the armor piercing thing is Florio BS, and from what I remember it's only rare in the U.S. (because it's foreign made).
Marv’s gun is can fire armor piercing rounds but the ammo is not available to civilians. Another important ballistics point is that they found shell casings in Dixon’s car.
That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"
by shake n bake on Jul 28, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ugh
*Marv’s gun can fire
That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"
by shake n bake on Jul 28, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What does that leave?
Shell casings from a gun Harrison owned and claimed was at home during the shooting were found in Dixon’s car. Sincerely, is any of that in question? Because if it is then I’m drinking the Kool-Aid and need to acknowledge it. That Harrison owned the gun and would lie about where it was on the day in question when asked by police really doesn’t make him any worse than Antonio Pierce hiding Plax’s gun. I just want to know if even that is more damning an accusation than Marv deserves.
by CooperManningsNotTrying on Jul 28, 2009 4:41 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
not casings from Marvins gun, casings from another
as in someone fired a gun from that car since the last time Dixon cleaned it.
That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"
by shake n bake on Jul 28, 2009 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who is "The"?
Dude, have some journalistic integrity and fix your headline!
(Seriously, though, if you’re going to get linked all over the web for something like this, you should make sure the headline makes sense.)
ESPN actually does employ some top journalists. Len Pasquarelli has always been a good guy and good writer, Clayton is excellent, and now they have Adam Schefter. But for every one of those there are three morons like Howard Bryant, Scoop Jackson, Gene Wojciechowski (who is THE Senior Columnist… what a joke), Jim Caple, and all their foolish overly urban TV anchors. Everything those people write is garbage. Unfortunately, as long as they have good ones hidden in their ranks, I’m still going to read them. So I get stuck having to wade through a sea of shit to get to it.
I’m not sure I’d go so far as to call someone like Kuharsky a pansy for not quitting in protest – that’s his full time job and this is not the time to be unemployed – but you’re right about the organization as a whole. Many of their criticism of weblogs are actually valid, though blown way out of proportion, but you know what they say about people who live in glass houses…
by willyduer on Jul 28, 2009 3:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
BTW
Anybody read the civil suit documents? Very detailed and very damning. Not a lawyer, but they look well drafted to me.
Also, based on the most recent photos, how many pies has Ben R consumed this offseason? I now know what he and LenDale have lined up as their retirement gigs: competition eating.
Oh and BBS, right on!
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Jul 28, 2009 6:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Retweeted
As a journalist myself ESPN ticks me off on a daily basis. How can they be considered the world wide leader in sports coverage if they talk about Romo dumping Jessica day 1 but wait a week to talk Big Ben.
"We have to find a way to play better, there's no doubt. Overall. I'm not pointing fingers at anybody. Offense, defense, pitching -- we have to find a way to play better. The reality of this is, coming here to Pittsburgh and being swept -- personally, I feel embarrassed." -- Carlos Beltran
by EMSfan9 on Jul 29, 2009 12:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ESPN 1250 in Pittsburgh reported on the story the same day the story broke on other networks.
What if the same thing would have happened to Peyton Manning?? I’m sure ESPN would have reacted the same way. GET OVER IT!!!!
Who's laughing now, O Line??? Ben Roethlisberger (from the Podium) to his O-Line and the world in Superbowl XLIII
by SteeladyinVA on Jul 29, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the same thing did happen...
To Marvin Harrison. ESPN danced all over it from the go, reporting anonymous leaks and nonsense as fact for weeks.
18to88.com
by deshawn zombie on Jul 29, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ESPN really is not an authority on shit anymore.
Everything they do is so over the top(Favre coverage, horrible basketball panelists saying only _ can win.
most importantly their network is showing signs of blatant racism in how they cover things.
additionally the entire networks coverage of the steroids fiasco is SICK. They refuse to report the facts of the time, and instead sensationalize everything and bash the players, but never talk about the culture of baseball 10 years ago, or how all the homeruns saved baseball, and helped ESPN and the tv industry.
by Go Ducks on Jul 30, 2009 6:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















