Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

The Stretch Play

via blogs.trb.com

Edge James was the original "stretch play" RB and even he was bad in short yardage. However, I still love ya Edge!

via blogs.trb.com Edge James was the original "stretch play" RB and even he was bad in short yardage. However, I still love ya Edge!

Do you guys remember the "stretch play"?

You know, it's the play that the Colts started using back in 1999 with Edge.  Peyton sprints to the outside and the O-line stretches horizontally (hence the name) and the RB uses his vision to find a seam and cut back into it. The Colts have been running it every year since then... except, for some unknown reason, they stopped running it last year.

Poof! It was gone like magic.

Many of us thought that it was due to the fact that Manning's knee was too weak to handle it, but then the knee got better and the Colts still didn't run it. Were the rookie guards just not able to handle it? Personally, I doubt that. The Colts have always been able to plug in young guards. Just look at years past when they had the revolving door of Tupe Peko, Steve Sciolio, and Rick DeMulling (and whoever else they could find, for that matter). The Colts were always able to run the stretch play despite injuries and turnover. I am not saying the stretch play is easy, but it's not as complicated as Denver's zone blocking system is, either. We will probably never know exactly why the Colts stopped running the stretch play last year, but it did expose us all to the fact that the running game has become a bit of a One-Trick Pony.

Star-divide

Without the stretch play the backs were lost, the O-line was lost (Jimmy Hoffa lost, that is) and the offense lost its identity (due to the inability to run play-action). It's a testament to the skill of Manning that he was able to work miracles without any running-game support. I know the stretch play is important, but don't you find it a little dumb that the Colts weren't able to at least grind out a mediocre running game using more "basic" run plays? I have always believed that if you can't line up in the Power-I formation and get at least 4 yards, then you might as well not even try.  That is pretty much what the Colts ended up doing last year.  By the end of the year they just flat out stopped running the ball. Short screen passes and hitches became our new running plays. Teams responded to this by running nickel and dime defenses on 1st and 2nd down. They dared the Colts to run because they knew they couldn't. Miraculously, the Colts managed to squeeze out an existence this way. What happened when the Colts needed just one yard...one tiny yard to defeat the Chargers?  Well, we all know that story already...

Now, I've been critical of the RB's and the O-Line, but I also think there is another issue here. That issue is the stretch play itself because (and I know this is a controversial opinion) the over-reliance on this play makes the Colts a soft running team. Sure, the Colts have been able to gobble up big  rushing statistics, but when they needed that one big game changing yard yard it always seemed to elude them. Think about it... the Colts have struggled, and I mean really struggled at short yardage. Just look at previous examples:
 
1. Edge fails to get a goal-line TD in the 2004 Pats game.
2. Same situation with Edge in the 2005 Pats game.
3. Joe Addai, in the 2008 Chargers playoff game, fails to convert on 3rd and short to win the game (and God only knows how many 3rd and shorts the Colts have failed on over the years).
4. Finally, let me just add that you know it's bad when every time there is a 3rd and short or a 3rd and goal you, as a fan, feel this sudden sensation of despair sweep over you.

My opinion is that the Colts' over-reliance on the stretch play is the cause of this. This reason being is that the stretch play is about pushing people to the side rather than pushing them back. It's about the RB using his vision to find seams rather than using his speed and power to run North-South. In short, the stretch play makes the Colts too "cute."
 
Sometimes, you just have to line up and push your man backwards to get that damn yard! The reliance on the stretch play has created a mentality (in addition to promoting a skill-set of speed over power) that makes the Colts very weak in short yardage. The offense spends most of the game using the stretch play, and/or variations of it, so much so that they are inept when it comes time for them to run the North-South style between the guard and the center.

I have no problem with the Colts running the stretch play some, but the team must get back to basics in terms of running the football. Run more straight ahead and a lot less side to side. As I said earlier, if you can't line up in the Power-I formation and get 4 yards then you might as well just not run the ball. Often times football games hinge on getting that one yard and it's discouraging to see this team rake up all sorts of wonderful statistics only to trip on those last few inches! Hopefully, this year Coach Caldwell will make short yardage conversion a priority. I think a big part of that has to be changing the mentality of our running game (both the RB's and O-line). No more dancing in the backfield, and no more fancy blocking footwork! Run North-South and "put your man down" Sean Connery-style in The Untouchables! I just want to see a little more Bill Parcell's style with the Colts running game.

So, to end this, I think it's important to remember that for one year in the Manning-era the Colts were actually fairly good in short yardage running. They weren't great at it, but they were certainly good enough. That year was 2006 and I think the Colts won something that year...

0 recs  |  Comment 43 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great post

I agree 100 percent. The stretch play is great for 1st and 10, but when it gets to 3rd and short, it’s useless. To be honest, it should be thrown out of the playbook.

by slash196 on Jul 30, 2009 2:49 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't say to just get rid of it,

but I agree it should be used less.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The World Series of Poker is finally back on ESPN starting this week (Tuesday nights). To commerate the event, here's a video of my favorite poker player at his best.

by Cassieper on Jul 30, 2009 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

But if we won’t spend a 5th rounder on a decent fullback, i don’t see that changing

by Eltoasto on Jul 30, 2009 4:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps they should train Gijon as a fullback. After all, he has the prototypical build of one…

by Mr. Naptown on Jul 30, 2009 5:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

one issue

I’d be curious to see some stats about how we’ve done on 3rd and 1 or 2 or 3rd and goal from the 1 or 2. Obviously we’ve had some pretty big ones that haven’t worked out but I wonder if it sticks out in our mind more than it should. I think we would all consider Pittsburgh a strong rushing team but we stuck them on that huge 3rd and goal from the 1 last year (Foster’s huge play). Also, I thought I remember that at least for a while last year we had some unbelievable stats on 3rd and short. This is probably something for Shake or Mgrex to address.

Overall I agree that we’re not a team that can just bull you over for a yard every single time we need it, but I just wonder what the stats are on this.

"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."

by psvirsky on Jul 30, 2009 7:52 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Isn't the Pittsburgh game last year

A defensive effort? I thought this post was more about offense.

by yellowsnow on Jul 30, 2009 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right

I was just pointing out that even the toughest running teams that seemingly always get those 3rd and 1’s can be stopped in big situations.

"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."

by psvirsky on Jul 30, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hm

Makes sense. Good point.

by yellowsnow on Jul 30, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stats Agree

Here’s some of what can be gleaned from Football Outsiders:

Power Success: Never in the top 20 since 2002 with one exception – 1st in 2007

3rd/4th Run Play Success Rank: 2008 – 28th; 2007 – 6th; 2006 – 20th; 2005 – 25th; 2004 – 16th; 2003 – 20th.

by Merr on Jul 30, 2009 8:08 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that sounds about right

That’s kind of crazy that we were 6th in ’07, I wonder how that happened

"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."

by psvirsky on Jul 30, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here are some of Mgrex's stats from this past season

http://www.stampedeblue.com/2009/1/14/723108/third-down-offense-inside

Overall last season we ranked 10th in the league when running on third and short (not too bad) and 2nd when faced with third and short in general (including passing plays).

We ranked 4th in the league on converting third down running plays.

Problem is we got worse as the season went on, these were the stats I was thinking of. Over the first 7 games, we were 11 for 13 running on third and short – that would have made us the best third and short running team in the league. Over the last 10 games (including playoffs), we were 17 for 27 when running on third and short. That would be 25th for the year (right behind the Pats).

So overall I do still agree that we never seem to get the third and short when we need it most, but we’re also not as bad as it seems. For half the year we were the best team in the league at running the ball on third and short. Then we dropped to the bottom 8 in the league.

Lastly, I forget if it’s the ‘04 or ’05 Pats game, but we failed to convert because the Pats cheated. After getting stopped twice we were going to run a play quickly on 3rd down and get in the end zone when one of their players faked an injury. I can’t remember if it was Colvin or McGinest, but they rolled around “in pain” for a while, gave them time to substitute and get set up, then on 4th down he jumps right back in and makes the crucial stop. He looked like a fucking soccer player faking an injury to give his team time (and I’m a soccer fan).

"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."

by psvirsky on Jul 30, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

'03 Pats game, actually.

Second Colts game I ever went to (after the ’98 Jets game). McGinest ruined the game for me……..

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The World Series of Poker is finally back on ESPN starting this week (Tuesday nights). To commerate the event, here's a video of my favorite poker player at his best.

by Cassieper on Jul 30, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks for that

I’ve blocked some of the details in my mind. Ugh

"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."

by psvirsky on Jul 30, 2009 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've done the same thing with the '03 and '04

Pats playoff games. I couldn’t tell you anything about them other than the score (24-14, 20-3) without looking them up. However, I remember the ’02 Jets game vividly.

I have a very strange mind.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The World Series of Poker is finally back on ESPN starting this week (Tuesday nights). To commerate the event, here's a video of my favorite poker player at his best.

by Cassieper on Jul 30, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, the 03 one will live forever

I mean, the Pats were great in ’04. They were the better team. I thought differently in ’03. We were playing unbelievably in the first two playoff games, and they were easily one of the worst 14-2 teams ever. Then, even with six turnovers, we were only 7 down in the 4th. How they only scored 24 points (we held them to 5 FGs) is insane. THat was a great defensive performance. Also, they absolutely interfered with us all the time that game.

EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Jul 30, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

McGinest

Yeah it was McGinest that did it and I may be mistaken but he came in the very next play and then the next year is when they made the rule that you had to sit out at least one play if you got hurt.

by ColtsFanInBearsCountry on Jul 30, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Controversial Analysis

Could it be that Tom Moore and Howard Mudd aren’t the greatest coaches in the world as some believe they are….that a change, either now or a year from now, to younger coaches with a different point of emphasis or strategy wouldn’t be such a bad thing?

Feel free to roast me for that question but we should all be able to agree that the answer isn’t clear cut.

"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."

by AceOfSpades on Jul 30, 2009 8:08 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

One could just as easily point out that the running game suddenly fell apart in a year where there was a large amount of OL turnover while Coach Mudd was out with an injury/surgery of his own, and that now that he’s back and fully mobile and on the field instead of in a box, things could improve dramatically.

by willyduer on Jul 30, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

3rd and short freaks me out!

Last year I was much more comfortable with 3rd and 6 or 3rd and 7 because then I knew we didn’t have to worry about trying a running play to “balance” our offense. I think that 5-wide receiver set you saw in the Colts/Titans game in week 17 was just a clue that Dungy was giving up on 3rd and short runs and was just going to give Peyton more chances to work it….

But then came the Chargers game and the most incredible performance by a punter I’ve ever seen….

by hoosierdore on Jul 30, 2009 8:10 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it goes back to the personnel

The Colts O-Line is full of mobile linemen who do an excellent job of getting to the edge and sealing it by before the defense can get to the runner. The tradeoff is, when you have linemen who are mobile, more times than not they’re a bit smaller than average, which makes them more susceptible to losing their ground or just not getting enough forward push when they need to grind it out in short yardage situations.

That, and I’d still like to see the Colts invest in a real fullback for a change.

Bullets Forever: A blog dedicated to the Washington Wizards with analysis, commentary, and more YouTube videos than your eyes can handle.

by JakeTheSnake on Jul 30, 2009 9:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

True

The Colts traditionally have smallish linemen in the interior and I guess we have to take the good with the bad if that’s how it’s going to be with Peyton back there.

"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."

by AceOfSpades on Jul 30, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right about the smaller than average linemen.

Dallas had very large linemen last year, and their runners had pretty good success. At least in the beginning of the season. If ours are smaller and susceptible, doesn’t that mean that tight ends and recievers need to help block?

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Jul 30, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the stretch play seems uneffective now

Because Edge was so damn good at waiting for that perfect hole, and pounding through it. I think Peyton likes running play action out of it, as the receivers can be deeper in their routes when the defense figures out it is a pass.

By the way, here are the stats of 3rd down offense from last season. The Colts were 10th in converting 3rd and shorts (28/40, or 70%), better than the Cowboys, Titans, and Giants, who all have short yardage backs.

And the 3rd and short I remember the most? This one.

by mgrex03 on Jul 30, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

ha, i just found that 3rd down post and wrote about it higher up on this thread

And good choice on our best 3rd and short. We ran straight up the gut and had a HUGE hole to do so. I guess sometimes we actually do come up big on those plays.

"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."

by psvirsky on Jul 30, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because Edge was so damn good

Exactly.

Yeah, so I sold out, do something about it! Like read my site Colts Chatter.

by KingRichard on Jul 30, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only that

but the reason the offense likes to run the stretch often is because when they do go playaction out of it, the motion makes it harder for a defense to decipher if its a run or pass.

However I do feel there is a need to reduce the number the number of times it is run. Not eviscerate, the stretch from the playbook, but just limit its useage

by metal_militia on Jul 30, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

3rd and short

Often times in the past it has been the skill of Peyton that has enabled the Colts to convert on 3rd and short. In 2004 Manning got a bunch of his 49 TD’s by throwing short passes in the goal line because the team couldn’t just run it in.

The issue is that I am just tired of seeing Manning have to do everything. Its foolish to rely on one player like that regardless of how great he is. Teams when Super Bowls not individual players. The team needs to give Manning some more help especially in 3rd and short.

by MasterRWayne on Jul 30, 2009 11:51 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

+100000000000000

"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."

by AceOfSpades on Jul 30, 2009 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jul 30, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

More than meets the eye

The stretch play was a brilliant design by OC Tom Moore to make his smaller o-line effective, and it worked beautifully for several years. Injuries and inexperience on the o-line was what did us in last year, plain and simple.

I agree that it’s not some Swiss Army knife play that works in every situation (most teams won’t typically run any sort of sweep in a short yardage situation, and the Colts don’t tend to use it there either). The Colts do need to work on their short yardage game plan. We know that. They know that. However, keep in mind that most teams have a much larger o-line than the Colts, which makes it look easier. I think the Colts team is perfect for a fullback compliment, which would allow them to do more straight-up blocking on the line, letting the FB handle getting into the defensive backfield to attack the linebacker. Without that, there is too much happening at the line that can keep a smaller offensive lineman from effectively fulfilling his role on that sort of play.

All that said, I think we’re going to see a more effective running game as our younger offensive linemen mature and gain more experience. Just ripping a play like the stretch that has worked so well for us in the past from the playbook doesn’t make any sense.

by Quasimojo on Jul 30, 2009 11:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Keep the Stretch

Just like play action, it keeps the D off balance. I appreciate a good jab in the face as much as the next football fan, but subtlety and diversion can work just as well very often. NOT ALL THE TIME, of course. If the DLs think they may have to run laterally half the time, then they cannot tee off and charge straight ahead every snap.

If we give up the stretch altogether, we lose a powerful weapon—it’s not just about the yards gained rushing on the stretch—it’s about the yards gained passong off the stretch play-action, and the yards gained elsewhere on other plays out of the same set because the stretch set it up. (i.e. a DB of S comes up wide guessing stretch and is caught backpedaling when 18 hits the TE for a 15 yarder.)

Think of the stretch, run 12 times a game, as a pitcher throwing inside. The batter backs up a bit, or shortens his swing, and then when the next pitch comes outside, he’s unprepared, or at least less prepared. As an old wrestler, I have great appreciation for the set-up, set-up, set-up, then go for the money move. Sometimes the setup will be a big winner itself, sometimes, it just builds for the next move.

Keep the stretch. And every back has to be able to run it and all formations need to be stretchable, so the D can never key on it being or not being the stretch.

Keep the stretch.

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Jul 30, 2009 12:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

In the article

I said I had no problem with the Colts running the stretch play, some. The problem is the teams over reliance on the stretch play makes the Colts a “soft” running team.

by MasterRWayne on Jul 30, 2009 1:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Interesting Points...

Most of what you said is accurate. I do agree with the fact that the Colts do try to run the stretch too much, but when it works, it’s a great strategy. Based on the running backs that we’ve had, the stretch play was to their strengths. I think the reason why Polian drafted Donald Brown is because he’s a guy that can run more North-South, or at least I hope. Joseph Addai is more of a cut-back runner than anything. However, the Colts still should utilize the streth play in their offense. When ran right, it’s usually a good 6-8 yards per carry.

I'll be the DJ, tell me what to play. No, I won't even play, just keep it on replay.

by The Answer 3 on Jul 30, 2009 1:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Donald Brown

I’ve been wondering how donald brown can fit into this play. It seems to me that addai is just not as good running it as edge was and we just kept it in the playbook due to previous success. Obviously our running game was very good in 06 (remember this pats game, not the others) , 07 wasnt bad but I think brown is the style of back that will fit perfectly in this play

by Coltsfaninoklahoma1 on Jul 30, 2009 2:26 PM EDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Running Game

The running game was good in ’06 and it was great in the playoffs. The ’07 running game was good, but then Addai wore out fast and has yet to recover. I see Donald Brown as more of a North-South style of running back. The stretch play is okay, but I just think its outlived its usefulness.

by MasterRWayne on Jul 30, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Personnel Group Changes for Short-Yardage

Perhaps we drafted a 330lb OG in Jaimie Thomas with the idea to change out personnel for short yardage situations (I had thought Cornellius Lewis too, until yesterday). It doesn’t matter if the defense knows what you’re going to do, as long as you can do it.

I think Hart is a good short-yardage back (see Baltimore Ravens 2008 game) and have a sense that Ball could be good be as well. But our Oline, as it has existed the past 2 seasons, has been more concerned about keeping Peyton clean (which they do an outstanding job of) than running the ball. But if you can switch out a guy or two on the Oline, who excel in run blocking, for known running plays maybe we can maybe pick up that tough yard. Or, if nothing else, cause some concern for the other team, and then catch them off guard with a short pass.

by GoHorse88 on Jul 30, 2009 3:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The stretch is THE key

I love all you fellow Colts fans but I have to benevolently disagree with all those who diss the stretch play. The Colts offense is all about execution, not about fancy plays and tricks. Yes, the Colts need to have better 3rd and short plays that they execute well. But all this crap about “we run the stretch too much” or “let’s get rid of the stretch” ?#! W T F! Come on! When the Colts have an effective stretch play they are a 35 point a game offense and without it they are a 24 point a game offense. PERIOD.

Beyond setting up big plays in play action, it really wears out the defense when it is run against an opposing defense regularly. The stretch play is never useless (of course if it can’t regularly gain 4 plus yards, we cannot afford to continue running it). We need to all hope that the Colts CAN run the stretch effectively this year. If we do, we make the opposing defense haul ass sideways. They’re edge is taken off, they are tentative. Peyton then disembowels that defense. Then for those late 4th quarter plays the opposing defense has nothing to bring. Then that San Diego situation does not happen.

We couldn’t run anything last year for a lot of reasons and there’s a lot of blame to go around. We didn’t suck rushing the football last year because we overused the stretch play in the previous years.

To those of you who think we need to line up in the I-formation and just push people backwards— well, we aren’t the Titans or the Jaguars. We don’t have that kind of offensive line. Our OL dominates with fitness. We can remember Jeff Saturday anihilating whats-his-face for the game winning touchdown in the AFC championship game, but that was against a worn out Patriot defense. The stretch wears out the opposing front 7 then our offensive line just looks fabulous. Yeah, all this north-south running stuff sounds great, but that’s like asking Peyton to change what he does and play like Brett Favre. We have to do what we do and be our true selves.

Stretch play to glory! Go Colts!

by coltstretch on Jul 30, 2009 8:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yup

I forgot about the fatigue factor, which might come into play more the more “two fatties in the middle” D’s we face. How many miles can these 325 lbers put on going laterally before their wheels come off?

Of course, the way a 3-4 D is set up in neutral (no LB on the line to rush) a stretch could be a poor play choice because of fast LB pursuit, but 18 is smart enough to check out of that and into a run up the gut. And if a 3-4 LB is on the line, PM runs away from him. Or towards him, for that matter—that’s supposed to be the way to neutralize a speed defender—run at him.

My view of 2008 was that it was an aberration—OL, RB, and QB health all affected just about everything, and 3 rookies on the OL for half the season, well, I just think the stretch has as much gas in its tank as 18 has to run it. When he can no longer sprint out, then we’ll deal with it. I didn’t love the stretch pitch, personally, because it forces an earlier offensive commitment, and eliminates much of the play-action potential.

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Jul 30, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

...

There are bonuses to the stretch play. I won’t deny that and that’s why I said we should run it some. However, the Colts need to get back to basics and run more North-South because they spend so much time running side to side that they are inept when they need to run North-South.

Everybody needs to be adaptable and the Colts offense needs to change a few things. Just a few tinkers here and there.

by MasterRWayne on Jul 30, 2009 10:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

quite honestly

I feel better with 3rd and 6 than I do with 3rd and 3. But i still think our running game is as good as it needs to be. The stretch play is perfect for the type of backs we draft the the type of linemen we have. I don’t care much about the running game, because most of the time, it’s the peyton manning show. When the run games needs to give him a bit of a break, as long as they get the four yards that i expect, i’m fine.

by Colts_and_Cavs_in_09! on Jul 31, 2009 3:14 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That's the problem

Its stupid to make the entire offense the “Peyton Manning Show.” The guy needs help and that is exactly what he had in the 2006 playoffs with a good running game and a great defense.

Even John Elway needed help to win his SB’s!

by MasterRWayne on Jul 31, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

But the stretch is so vital

It really makes a defense guess since the stretch motion in the stretch play makes it hard to decipher where the run is going or if its play action. The only reason I advocate more straight ahead running is because I think it is a better way to accommodate Browns home run threat. Other than that, the stretch is perfect forthis offense.

by metal_militia on Jul 31, 2009 9:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bob_sanders4_small
Jerraud Powers: Old Man
Bilde_small
Sebastian Vollmer had help on Freeney 36 out of 44 passing attempts
Bruce-treetops1_small
Ask Baltimore Beatdown: Questions for the Ravens Blogger
Nnamdi_small
Why The Colts Really Won and the State of the Rivalry
Small
Manning to Wayne Touchdown, Tecmo Super Bowl Style

Recent FanPosts

Small
Help I can't play videos from colts.com
Belicheat_small
College Football- Open Thread
Small
College Open Thread #2
Img_1672_small
Matt Stover!
Peyton-manning_small
More bad journalism (read at your own risk)
N17901640_32485246_6102070_small
Gonzo update
Small
Gary Brackett
Peyton_framed1_painting_small
Cool Video on Sunday's Game
Small
Question: What is Deion Sanders issue with Peyton & the Colts?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editor

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Contributing Writers

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Seyton_manning_feature_small KingRichard

Change_small Colts Homer