Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation MMA Twitter List

Stampede Blue

"Why Pats fans, why?"

(After posting this yesterday I followed thefrozz's recommendation and have since posted it on the Pats Pulpit site. Link here. This should provide a few chuckles in an otherwise slow football time of year.) 

I've always been one of those people who have a morbid fascination with the things most contrary to those which I hold dearest. For example, I am a die-hard fan of Miller Lite. I've drank it for years. Love it, can't get enough of it. Considering naming my first-born child after it. Well, every once in a while I'll be at my favorite sports bar, aptly named The Sportsden, watching a Colts game perhaps, and I'll get the wild notion to order a Budweiser, seemingly out of nowhere.

"Why would you do this?", one might ask, when Miller Lite is the obviously superior beverage. Do you enjoy waking up the next morning with a splitting headache and the taste of fresh dump in your mouth?

The answer is, no, I do not. But sometimes I just can't help but wonder, "What makes this so great that thousands of idiots would spend their hard-earned dollars on an obviously inferior product?"

Earlier today I had the same thought about the New England Patriots

And like so many times in my past, instead of letting this errant thought go to wherever it is that unworthy thoughts go to after your brain is done farting them out, I decide to find out what attraction people have to these, the Buttweisers of Professional Football.

Now, I decide that the fastest way to know the heart and mind of the smelly beast known as  the Pats Fan would be to observe him in his natural environment. A place where, being amongst others of his kind, he would be most relaxed and forthcoming with his innermost thoughts and desires. So, I decide, my friends to enter the lair of the beast itself, the dreaded Pats Pulpit, Blogspot of the Devil...

I mean, if I wanted to divine the inner workings of the average fan of the greatest team in professional sports, the Indianapolis Colts, I would visit Stampede Blue, a worthy blogspot that hosts a variety of blogs, fanposts, comments and discussions by fans on the topic of their favorite team, the Indianapolis Colts. Now, that being given, one might conclude that the same might be said of the den of the enemy, the Pats Pulpit.

Right?

Wrong.

Upon visiting this ghost town of a site, the first thing I noticed (other than the proverbial tumbleweeds blowing across my vision) was the absence of my intended subject of study, the Pats Fan. It felt rather like those portions of National Geographic that we, the viewers, never see, in which the film crew sits for hours and days waiting... waiting for the merest hint of a sighting of their subject of study, the ever-elusive howler monkey (the howler monkey being the animal who's incessant shrieking jabber I most closely liken to that of a Pats fan), but who must finally pack up their gear and go home empty-handed.

Now don't get me wrong, this site appears to be professionally run and full of well-written and informative posts on the subject of the most overrated team in professional sports, the New England Patriots, but what it glaringly seems to lack is readers. At least the kind that participate...

Just by looking at the home page one can readily see the lopsided comparison to that of Stampede Blue, and through my love of all things sports I felt compelled to get to the bottom of this. To see it in X's and O's. To break it down. So, in the finest tradition of sports, I give you this...The Statistical Comparison:

Frequency of featured posts (the time elapsing between the most recent blog and the last one on the home page approximately):

  • Stampede Blue: 64 hrs.
  • Pats Pulpit: 63.5 hrs.
  • Like I said, pretty well-ran site, almost dead-on with ours.

Frequency of fanposts (how far back do the top ten headlines go back in the Recent Fanposts section):

  • Stampede Blue: 17 days (avg. 1 post every 40.8 hrs.)
  • Pats Pulpit: about a month (approx. 1 post every 72 hrs.)
  • Not very good for the Pats fans. We outpace them with posts occurring 43.3% more frequently. (Note: This may, however, be attributed to the fact that most Pats fans are known to be knuckle-dragging illiterates.)

 

Number/frequency of comments made on top ten fanposts combined (how much we the fans care about what others on our respective sites say):

  • Stampede Blue: 128 comments (approx. 1 comment every 3 hrs. 11 mins.)
  • Pats Pulpit: 96 comments (approx. 1 comment every 7.5 hrs.)
      Pretty bad considering their posts have been up 43.3% longer than ours. Conclusion: Pats fans are less than half as likely to listen to each other as opposed to listening to themselves.

Number of comments made on featured posts written by staff writers as seen on the home page (how much the fans care about the content being provided to them by their favorite fan site):

  • Stampede Blue: 115 comments
  • Pats Pulpit: 8 comments
    Yes, boys and girls, you read that right, 8. A measly 8 comments compared to our 115. Pathetic...

And so on my search for the answer to the question "Why would one wish to be a Patriots fan when you could be a fan of the vastly superior and nearly god-like Indianapolis Colts?", I must concede defeat.

It seems that some of life's mysteries were just never meant to be solved...

 

(Note: all numbers based on the appearance of said home pages as of 12:00 p.m., July 4th. Maybe this had something to do with the results of my imperfect study. There's a good chance most Pats fans were too busy at local hospitals being treated for fireworks-related injuries to their throwing hands due to their inability to properly time their release. Ohhhh...)

  •  
    •  

         

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Stampede Blue's writers or editors.

3 recs  |  Comment 72 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Time to derail this subject

Miller Lite? REALLY?

I’m sorry, the superior beer is Sierra Nevada Bigfoot. This is what men drink. If you’ve gotta buy corner-store beer, even a nice Same Adams would stand head and shoulders above Miller frackin’ Lite.

My advice: Stop hating on the watery sewage that is slightly less gross than your preferred watery sewage, and get a new favorite beer. Maybe one that doesn’t come in cans and plastic bottles (you’re not drinking Mountain Dew, after all).

by slash196 on Jul 4, 2009 6:01 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Dude.

It was merely a metaphor. I happen to enjoy Sierra Nevada. Good stuff. As for the Sam Adams…I patently refuse to partake of anything that originated in Boston, even beer.

by peytonsurdaddy on Jul 4, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, you visited the black hole of Calcutta that is the Pats Blog. You're very Brave.

Nearly god-like Indianapolis Colts. Great line!

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Jul 4, 2009 6:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Eh

Miller Lite and Bud are both awful.

Unfortunately they’re about the only American beers you can ever find out of the States.

Sorry, what was this about again?

by eltharion_doa on Jul 4, 2009 7:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

At least it is not Heineken

Piss in a bottle for sure.

"I saw a commercial on late night TV, it said,'Forget everything you know about slipcovers.' So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were."
-Mitch Hedberg

by Colts Homer on Jul 4, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heineken > Bud. At least the stuffed brewed in Europe is…it’s likely brewed by someone else in the States.

I’d have to try Miller Lite again to compare it, but from what I recall from my uni days, Heineken knocked that into the park as well.

by eltharion_doa on Jul 4, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

eeww

beer

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 4, 2009 7:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd this...

Funny and well written. Make this a Fan Post on their site and I’ll bet the # of comments goes up exponentially!

Oh, btw, Sierra Nevada Porter is to die for!!

A fan of the vastly superior and nearly god-like Indianapolis Colts.

Pressure is somethig you feel when you don't know what you're doing!
-Chuck Knoll

by thefrozz on Jul 4, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I just did...

I took your advice and posted this on the Pats Pulpit site. I hope they have a better sense of humor than my Patriots-loving brothers-in-law. Link here if you want to find out…

by peytonsurdaddy on Jul 5, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

First Off

This was a great post and very well written, the comedy well timed. Secondly, I am NOT the biggest beer drinker, but I’ve drank a lot of different beers from a lot of different countries, and after living in Monterey, CA for two years and having Sierra Nevada shoved down my throat over and over, I will never drink another of their products again.

Beer is for sitting on the patio on summer days and to stay sober while watching football, Vodka is for the real drinking.

I also wish I had time and motivation to blog at Speed Blue Nation

by Bullard47 on Jul 5, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Too often

have I asked myself this very same question. I don’t know if it’s good or sad that it still remains one of the great unknown mysteries of the world.

Belgium dark Leffe is the superior beer.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jul 5, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

We should all agree to disagree on beer. It truly is a matter of personal taste.

I also wish I had time and motivation to blog at Speed Blue Nation

by Bullard47 on Jul 5, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We may have to

:)

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jul 5, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leffe is a poor imitation of a real belgian beer. Rodenbach is the way to go.

by Cow of Pain on Jul 6, 2009 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tastes great!

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Jul 5, 2009 11:32 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This was quite humorous and well done.

by BabeParilli on Jul 5, 2009 4:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Our-ah site is-ah bettah than you-ah site

NOONE DENIES THIS!

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 5, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Go regional

The midwest is a fine place to live for two reason: the Colts and microbrews. Nothing makes a good Hayden interception, a Mathis sack, or a Wayne circus catch better than a bottle of anything by Bell’s, Great Lakes Brewing Company, Three Floyds, etc.

by tenyardfight on Jul 5, 2009 8:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I Can't believe you posted that on the patriots/cheaters blog site.

The sparks are gonna fly. I think you’re Dr. Evil’s even eviler (is that a word?) twin.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Jul 5, 2009 8:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't get it messed up.

The Colts are the cheaters, not the Pats.

by BabeParilli on Jul 5, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol how

do I get to dig up the NFL.com link on the network broadcast screw up that the uninformed hold up as proof of “pumping in crowd noise”?

Which team was docked a 1st round pick for violating league rules again? I forget.

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 5, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've got your back.

Here are some links for you BabeParilli:

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90779/90867/6297597.html

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/21639328/

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Patriots-complain-about-crowd-noise?urn=nfl,52422

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d803f1ce4&template=with-video&confirm=true

Is that enough proof, or do you need more?

Oh, and this one is my personal favorite:

http://kdka.com/national/Bill.Belichick.New.2.289024.html

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Joseph Addai, otherwise one as The Great Irrationally Hated One, is the first and only running back to rush for 1,000 yards in a season without starting a game in that season.

by Cassieper on Jul 5, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Got any links

that state the NFL said the Pats cheated? Because other than that my word that the Colts cheated is as valuable as your word that the Pats cheated. That is; not of any value ;).

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

in the last link
ESPN.com, citing league sources, reported Tuesday that Goodell has determined the Patriots violated league rules Sunday when they videotaped defensive signals by the Jets’ coaches. But the report also said the Patriots have not yet presented their case to the league.

The Web site’s report said Goodell is considering severe sanctions, including docking the Patriots “multiple draft picks.”

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 6, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like I said,

the NFL never said the Pats cheated. Teams break the rules all the time; really on every play. Penalties are assessed for rules violations if they are discovered.

When does a rules violation become cheating in your view?
 
Besides, the NFL memo came out just before the season started. So the Pats were in violation for one quarter and the tape was obviously not even viewed.

The Pats said the Jets did the same thing, and the Jets admitted it. But they said they had permission. The Pats said they gave no such permission. I don’t believe the NFL memo allows such taping even with the other team’s permission. Why were the Jets not penalized? They admitted doing it.

Are the Broncos “cheaters” for violating the cap rules in their Super Bowl years? The NFL doesn’t say they are cheaters.

If a team was cheating they would take the championship away from them. According to the NFL the Pat’s 3 Super Bowl Championships are just as valid as the Colts one.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The adjective cheating has 2 meanings:

Meaning #1: not faithful to a spouse or lover
  Synonyms: adulterous, two-timing

Meaning #2: violating accepted standards or rules
  Synonyms: dirty, foul, unsporting, unsportsmanlike

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 6, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

link

http://www.answers.com/cheating

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 6, 2009 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So,

in your view offensive holding is cheating. That is a rules violation. The offending player is certainly not voluntarily admitting he cheated. So, I guess we can call, every NFL team cheaters by your reasoning.

Even those cheatin’ Colts.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the Pats organization cheated

pretty much every player has, but few entire organizations have been proven to have.

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 6, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

those cheating individual Colts players

vs those cheating individual Pats players and that cheating Pats organization.

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 6, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is no shortage

of examples of teams violating rules.

Denver cooking the books on the cap.

The Dolphins tampering for Schula.

Packers players offering money for performance.

The Niners tampering with Briggs.

There are many more. And even more that have never been proven but did occur.

So, all these teams are cheaters to you?

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes and I trust that the commish punished them appropriately

though I know tampering is pretty much unenforced at this point.

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 6, 2009 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's an interesting hypothesis and good basis for an intellectual debate

I can play along and call everyone a cheater, but you simply can’t paint everyone with the same broad brush. That’s like calling someone who has a minor traffic violation is as much of a criminal as is a murderer. Intent, degree and established pattern / frequency weighs in.

In my mind the meaning for Americans around “cheat” or “cheater” connotes deceptive intent with large competitive advantage and repeated application. Sounds a lot like the patriots to me.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Jul 6, 2009 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting.

But not so at all.

The Patriots were not deceptive in any way. They openly did the taping. One of the tapes shows Herm Edwards waving to the camera!

And Goodell concluded that NO competitive advantage was gained.

By your own definition this was not cheating.

Now, let’s be clear. Taping of defensive signals was allowed by the rules. But it was prohibited from certain locations. The only violation the Patriots were guilty of is WHERE they taped from. So it’s pretty much like parking in a no parking zone. A minor traffic violation in relative terms.

In light of these facts and being a person obviously concerned with fairness, a person opposed to deception, a person mindful of the degree of the transgression, I’m sure you would agree calling the Patriots cheaters is…… well, being a cheater oneself.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

such a minor violation that they were docked a 1st round pick for it

or is the big bad league office just out to get the Pats?

That's big talk for a little guy,
but I'm walkin' without reply.
-Lil Wayne "Mr. Postman"

by shake n bake on Jul 6, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually,

Goodell blew the whole thing. He IS an idiot. He penalized the Pats a #1 pick to quell the angry mob he had stirred up. Then he immediately stonewalled the whole mess and circled the wagons. Even Polian’s only comment was that it was over and done.

The Dolphins had been penalized a 1st round pick for tampering with Shula years earlier. They also penalized Denver for cap violations nearly $1 mil and a 3rd round pick.

The Pats penalty was not extremely severe in relative terms. Goodell was just super pissed they ignored his memo. He likes to think he is God.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

With what brush would you paint the great and powerful Steelers' teams of the '70s?

the great and powerful Steelers’ teams of the ’70s? Rampant, blatant steroid use, distributed by the team physician.

That seems like “deceptive intent with a ‘large’ competitive advantage and repeated application” to me.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 7, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

um. ok.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Jul 7, 2009 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What does that even mean?

ok, lol, my comment wasn’t exactly proofread before I hit “post” (damn!) but the point was still clear:

It’s fact that the steelers of the 70s used steroids, and the famed ‘steel curtain’ defense had the help of illegal substances to bolster the size of those players – at least one of whom has written a book about it. Yet, those Super Bowls are only questioned by teams that played the Steelers the most.

Why wouldn’t the blatant use of steroids be a greater example of cheating than filming defensive signals? You can’t argue that it didn’t give that team a distinct advantage over every other team i the league.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 7, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just meant ok

I never mentioned anything about the Steelers and didn’t get into that argument either way.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Jul 7, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know you didn't

your “broad brush” seemed only to include the Patriots

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 7, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is

a great price to be paid so stealer fans can proudly proclaim their greatness about their 6 rings.

Thirteen veterans of those juiced stealer teams of the 70s have died before the age of 50. Seven of those were heart attacks.

I wonder if the fans ever appreciate that people had to die to give them their tainted bragging rights. Sad really.

If steroids were legal then, why did the stealers do it in secret? Fact is misuse of prescription drugs was illegal in the NFL even back then. And the stealers certainly misused them. No other team had anywhere near the prevalent use that the stealers had.

by BabeParilli on Jul 7, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks - i didn't have the numbers in front of me

but I knew it was tragic. Even one early death from steroid use, was too many.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 7, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what

there is huge difference in offensive holding witch happens on pretty much every play to different degrees, and video taping the rams walkthrough before the superbowl. What you can’t even compare the two

by jbots317 on Jul 6, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, now

 you are going too far. The NFL was clear and Matt Walsh was clear that there was no taping of any walkthrough.

And as I have said, the extent of the Patriots rule violation was taping from an unapproved location. Taping signals was allowed by rule.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man...

I think you comment more on this site than you do on your own. Are you sure you’re not a closet Colts fan or something? It’s okay, you can tell me… I’ll keep your secret, buddy.

by peytonsurdaddy on Jul 5, 2009 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope,

not a Colts fan, but I can appreciate the excellent teams that have put on the field these last years. I would say they are clearly the second best team this decade after the Pats.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dear Mr. Babe

Everyone knows what the patriots mantra is .“if you’re not cheatin’ you’re not tryin’”

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Jul 6, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LaDanian "I'm a classy guy" Tomlinson

You’re quoting a guy who regularly threw his coach under the bus and chose to sit on the bench alone, hiding behind his little visor, rather than cheer on his teammates in their most important game of the season. Now there’s a guy I really respect.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 6, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I REALLY wasn't quoting Tomlinson.

That quote was around LONG before LT said it.

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Jul 6, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe,

but only Tomlinson (I refuse to dignify him with Lawrence Taylor’s moniker) used that phrase in his press conference referring to the Pats.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 6, 2009 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My dad always corrects me when I refer to Tomlinson as LT.

He says that there’s only one LT, and his name is Lawrence Taylor. Blame it on ESPN…

"Peyton Manning flow, I just go no huddle."
- Lil' Wayne, Put Some Keys on That

by KMR24 on Jul 12, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe,

but only Tomlinson (I refuse to dignify him with Lawrence Taylor’s moniker) used that phrase in his press conference referring to the Pats.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 6, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Al Davis said it as pertaining to football

Years ago. I hate to admit that I was quoting him!

"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino

by Indy Lori on Jul 7, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I think we can all agree on that.

by peytonsurdaddy on Jul 7, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe,

but only Tomlinson (I refuse to dignify him with Lawrence Taylor’s moniker) used that phrase in his press conference referring to the Pats.

Keep the faith!

by Cassieper on Jul 6, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seems

Goodell and the NFL don’t see it that way. They are part of “everybody” aren’t they? Folks like Bill Parcells, Jimmy Johnson and Herm Edwards say this is nothing of significance. They are part of “everybody” aren’t they?

You wouldn’t be trying to use the rules violations that the NFL has determined were committed as a way of reconciling the fact the Patriots have dominated the Colts over the last decade would you? The NFL says the Patriots accomplishments were all valid.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Facts

1) Pats broke the league rules and received the biggest team and coach punishment in league history. I don’t know how you can refuse that.

“Cheaters” = acronym of rule breakers. Stupid acronym, but still.

2) All the accusations of “turning up the heat” and “piping in artificial noise” have never been proven.

How does that make Colts cheaters?

(Had the league withdrawn the Pats titles, there would have been a big mess. Who should get handled the title in stead? Not saying that a title withdrawal would have appropriate, since I haven’t seen the evidence (neither have you, Goodell has), but it’s quite easy to see why they are still in Pats hands.)

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jul 6, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you

mean synonym not acronym. (Just FYI)

If the league had removed the Pat’s titles this would still be in court. Kraft should have gone to court anyway, but was being a good little NFL owner when Goodell messed up.

I don’t consider the Colts cheaters even if they did turn up the heat or pipe in noise. Teams will try almost anything to try to get the slightest edge. I consider it like trying to steal the catcher’s signals in baseball.

by BabeParilli on Jul 6, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s weird. Can someone please remind me, who said:


The Colts are the cheaters, not the Pats.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jul 7, 2009 4:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Point was

any fan can say anything they want. That doesn’t make it so. I and a million other fans can say the Colts cheated repeatedly, but if the NFL doesn’t take away their Lombardi Trophy then all that fan talk doesn’t mean diddly squat.

by BabeParilli on Jul 7, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Pats did brake the rules – and not only that, they got the biggest penalty on league history. The league did in fact think they cheated (aka. broke the rules) – otherwise they probably wouldn’t have penalized them.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jul 7, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks

for the humor. its nice to mix it up here and there. =)

by MARVININDY on Jul 6, 2009 6:55 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

pats fans post on blog

hey you all have to go check out this post on the pats blog its hilarious half the comments are about beer, not the lack of their participation in their teams blogs LOL NOT THE BEER.

by jbots317 on Jul 6, 2009 8:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

funny, not even your post is about what the post is about

actually, yours wasn’t even the least bit humorous.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Jul 7, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Medium_jabe_small
One For the Ladies - The NFL's Best Looking Offense
Small
A different approach to power Rankings
Peyton_framed1_painting_small
Peyton Manning skit on ESPN's Mayne Event
Aaiu088_bob-sanders-posters_small
THE STATE OF THE 49ers: WEEK 8 EDITION
Dave_small
49ers-Colts Q&A with 49ers fans

Recent FanPosts

N20714104_32655596_7798_small
Edge Cut by Seattle
Aaiu088_bob-sanders-posters_small
Maybe Edge can take Brown under his wing?
6a00d8341c630a53ef010536a2ca2b970b-800wi_small
Peyton in 2009 and Projecting What is to Come for #18 by Season's End
Small
Shane Andrus Cut
No_1_small
Power Rankings - Week 9
Small
Saints = Scary?
Small
If you needed any more proof on Manning being the greatest quarterback of the decade
Ios-002528_small
RG?
Peyton_framed1_painting_small
Are MNF announcers as bad as I think they are?
100_1550_small
New Pats Prospect

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Daily Norseman
Van Heusen Hall of Fame Interview Part 2: Paul Krause
Buc 'Em
Diary of a Football Dad: A Flash Forward?
Daily Norseman
Goodell Begging Congress to Clean Up His Mess

Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editor

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Contributing Writers

Masonair_small JakeTheSnake

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Seyton_manning_feature_small KingRichard

Change_small Colts Homer