Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Observations about the Indianapolis Colts' 2009 defense

Colts.com has a nice article up about new defensive coordinator Larry Coyer and how he has an "open door" policy with the players. Essentially, Coyer makes it a point to listen to player input and, when possible, incorporates that input into the defense's game plan.

"You need to listen to your players," Coyer said recently. "We try to have an open-door policy. We can’t incorporate everybody, but we need to listen to our players because they play the game. Coaching genius is great, but if they can’t execute it, it isn’t nothing. It’s playing genius that we need.

"We’re trying to incorporate player input into our game plan."

As the Colts game plan this week for their third pre-season game (against the Detroit Lions), it will be interesting to see what new wrinkles Coyer will throw out there, and if any of those wrinkles are suggestions from players.

As we've blogged about all off-season, the retirement of Tony Dungy has both its negatives and its positives. Gone is a Hall of Fame head coach; maybe the best of his generation. He was a magnificent game manager and, quite possibly, the best football teacher in the game. But Dungy's great gifts as a coach also came with weaknesses. Dungy was oftentimes too loyal to assistants who, quite frankly, stunk at their jobs. With Dungy now doing work that seems to transcend football while, at the same time, remaining involved in it (see Michael Vick), it provided the Colts an opportunity to re-energize the team by cutting loose old, ineffective coaches and bringing in some new voices.

Larry Coyer is one of those new voices, and the players are listening attentively.

"He has his own style and he’s ‘Old School,’" Colts four-time Pro Bowl defensive end Dwight Freeney said. "I like to sit down there with him because he has so much knowledge and so much experience, so you can kind of pick his brain.

"That’s what I like to do. I like to sit there and talk to him."

Freeney's sentiments have been echoed by other players on defense, such as Antoine Bethea and Gary Brackett. Players like Eric Foster have stated that they have "fallen in love" with Coyer and the kind of defense he is bringing to Indy.

But what have we actually seen with our own eyes that makes this defense "new" or more interesting than the one former coordinator Ron Meeks ran for seven years?

Star-divide

In the first two pre-season games, we've seen more "movement" from the defensive players. If there is one obvious change from the Dungy-Meeks Tampa-2, that is the biggest, movement. The old defense would line up in standard 4-3 look and play, for the most part, Tampa-2 coverage with the LBers and DBs. Now, we are seeing a very different approach. For example:

On a third down play against the Eagles last week, we saw the Colts three linebackers move down from their normal Tampa-2 coverage areas into the gaps along the defensive line. This gave the offense for the Eagles pause. Sure, they'd seen blitzing before. They'd just never seen it from the Colts. With seven players down near the defensive line showing blitz, Eagles' QB Donovan McNabb pointed out the MIKE backer to his offensive linemen and called for the snap. When the ball snapped, the Colts linebackers... immediately dropped back into their normal Tampa-2 zones.

At another point in the game, Colts strong safety Melvin Bullitt (filling in for the injured Bob Sanders), blitzed and recorded a sack. PhilB at the Indy Star breaks down the defensive alignment:

Interesting alignment on Melvin Bullitt's sack. The safety blitz worked, in part, because Session also blitzed on the Eagles' left side as the Colts showed six and brought 'em.

Also, in practices, we're also seeing more stunting from the defensive line, as well as Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis used as stand-up pass rushers. Defensive ends, like Raheem Brock, are moving (pre-snap) from end to tackle, using their speed to attack a gap inside and pressure the pocket.

Because of all this movement, it is likely that the corners need to play a bit more-man-to-man coverage than the normal Cover-2. I haven't watched much of the DBs. so, if someone has any observations about this, add them in the comments.

The change in philosophy from Meeks to Coyer is "aggressiveness." It's important to stress that aggressiveness does not mean "tougher." Say what you will about Ron Meeks, but despite a revolving door at the defensive tackle spot for years, he has managed to coach the Colts defense to surrendering only 19 points per game the last three seasons.

I don't care who you are. That's damn impressive. No "soft" defense holds team to 19 a game over three years.

We all remember the years under coaching losers like Vic Fangio and Rusty Tillman, where the Colts defense would surrender an average of 27 points per game. So, while Meeks might not have been the greatest DC in the world, he got the job done. Now, it is up to Coyer to build on that solid foundation. So far, players are responding very well, and maybe, just maybe, we might have a dominant defense in Indy in 2009. We'll see.

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

"might have a dominant defense . . . ."

Boy, wouldn’t that be terrific? But I’ll be pleased if we don’t give up any huge rushing days to guys like Maurice Jones-Drew and get the ball back into Peyton’s hands a few more times per game. As in three and outs.

by oldecoltsfan on Aug 24, 2009 2:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Pretty cool

to watch Philly have to punt a few times. Now we just have to have the San Diego punter assasinated.

by tim55 on Aug 24, 2009 3:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Seriously.

I watched a little of the Charger/Cardinal game and that freakin’ Scrifes was doing the same thing to the Cards.

But Rivers got sacked several times (hahahaha) and both he and Warner threw interceptions in the end zone. (smile)

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Aug 24, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

Now that made me laugh out loud. Would be nice to see San Diego get clobbered by the Colts this year. I’m starting to hate Rivers more than Brady. Well, it’s getting close.

Unfortunately that division is so weak. Would be nice if Denver stepped up.

by buymymonkey on Aug 25, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

We don't play San Diego this season.

We’d have to play them in the playoffs.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Whenever I think of Tom Brady, my thoughts immediately turn to this.

by Cassieper on Aug 25, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Coaching Losers"?

Maybe you should take a look at Vic Fangio and Rusty Tillman’s respective coaching careers before you label them “losers”. Have you no shame?

We came in last in the AFC east when we had Jim Johnson – you think that maybe the talent ALL THREE of these fine, successful gentlemen had to work with was somewhat to blame?

Or was Jim Johnson a “loser” too?

Sometimes you sound like a 15 year old kid trying to impress the adults in the room.

The next time you feel like labeling a coach a “loser”, why don’t you have the basic common decency to look at his career BEFORE and AFTER whatever stint you are railing against.

Fangio came to us from Carolina (where he was very successful) and left to become the Defensive Coordinator for the Houston Texans.

So… he fooled three teams? Well, I guess more than that – he fooled the teams that struggled against his defenses in Carolina too. “Losers” are so sneaky. In Texas he had even a worst dearth of talent than here.

Rusty Tillman was the defensive coordinator for Seattle before he came here and he has been in the league since. I think he is happier as a position coach though.

I would LOVE to see you call Rusty a “loser” to his face. But I guess it is safer for you to toss stones from your hiding place on the internet; isn’t it.

by zilla1126 on Aug 24, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Being great with talented players...

is one thing, but when your given an average group of players, can you make them great? Jim Johnson is about the only one of those guys who could, and he simply was not setup to succeed here in Indianapolis. However, Tony Dungy did it….and I would say that excluding Freeney, there wasnt really a whole lot of real talent on the team defensively when he came here…

The rest of those guys, really havent amounted to squat since…Fangio is on a team thats never had a winning season, and where is Tillman? Dunno… Johnson on the other hand landed on a team that was a quality team and that bought into what he was doing…

To be fair, some coaching styles require a specific setup…..but its the coaches who take ANY team and make them relevant, that to me shows true greatness….. Dungy did it…in more than one place..

by DevilsReject on Aug 24, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I completely agree..

can’t call these guys loosers at all. It is really easy to do…but we really should refrain.

Ultimately it is about the talent on the field. If a coach has it he can win..if not..loose. Of course there are exceptions to this, but they are usually short lived single season anomolies. Was Jim Mora a looser?

I say this with complete sincerity..and no offense intended to anyone…especially Dungy..but I think it is safe to say that he would not have won as much with the Colts if he didn’t have a singular player named Manning. Period. He could, maybe have been successful, depending on who the QB was, but he would not have been nearly as successful. Nuff Said.

Kick it through the uprights with Adam Nuougatieri!

by TRDean on Aug 25, 2009 6:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here's the issue plain and simple...

The Tampa 2 scheme works, we all know it does. It worked in Tampa Bay for many years, works in Chicago, and has worked here in Indy. We’ve got talented players on defense, and we’ve got a good pass defense, and we even have a team capable of playing good run defense.

The problem for the Colts, notoriously, has been getting people off the field on 3rd down.

You can make comments about who the Defensive Coordinator was or is, but ultimately, the last 4 playoff losses the Colts have had, came from not being able to get the other team off the field.

2004 – Patriots – had extended drives of over 8 min a piece…
2005 – Steelers – sucker punched by countless 3rd and 2 conversions
2007 – Chargers – done in by countless 3rd down conversions
2008 – Chargers – couldnt stop anyone on 3rd down

Bottom line here is this, I dont care what you do to the defense, the only real change I care about is getting the other team off the field on 4th down. Whether it’s “aggressive”, “blitzing”, or the same old crap we’ve had…..just get the other team off the field…

Go back and look if you doubt me. We have one of the better defenses in the league. We have the personnel to be a top 5 defense. Our problem is not performing on 3rd down. If we can change that statistic, then the Colts Defense as a whole improves. This puts our Offense back on the field more, and puts our Defense back on the bench to rest up.

by DevilsReject on Aug 24, 2009 4:31 PM EDT reply actions   3 recs

Well said.

"Flying blind on a rocket cycle?" -Vultan, from the movie "Flash Gordon", for no particular reason...

by peytonsurdaddy on Aug 24, 2009 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Devils is exactly right

Failure on 3rd down has really killed this defense. Its sad because they’ve been very good at everything else particularly stopping the pass. Personally, I think this defense got a big too small. We need to get a little bigger and tweak some things in order to fix this issue.

by MasterRWayne on Aug 24, 2009 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Third down failures are often a symptom of first and second down failings. The T2 defense is great at limiting big plays and YAC and all that, but a patient team with some balance can easily pick at it with short gains on every play, and that’s what everyone started to do to the Colts. All it takes is 3 yards a play to piece together an endless drive, or 4 yards a play if you’re not the 4th down conversion type. We saw an awful lot of that the past several years.

And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s not a total failure to give up 4 yards on a play, especially on a passing play.

We’ve seen a variety of problems, from the line being dominated due to size to the linebackers missing tackles to the coverage being too soft on 3rd and 8s, but there’s no one single thing that has kept the D from producing a few more negative and 0-2 yard plays per drive. Getting bigger will help a little, if the DTs can eat up another blocker or stop someone from getting out to the 2nd level to hit a LB, but Tony was never wrong when he insisted over and over that with proper execution, the defense would be fine. If everyone executed just right, things really did go very well, and we saw that in the 06 playoffs against LJ and the Ravens running games.

The problem is that it’s not realistic to expect people to never miss a single tackle, as frustrating as it is when they do. A different way to go about solving the problem is what I think we’ll see this year – a bit more risk/aggression with the hopes that the good results (stops in the backfield, more sacks, fumbles, INTs) outweigh the increase in bad results (I’d bet we see more 20+ yard completions and 3rd and long successes this year). Honestly, there have been times when I’d have almost preferred they just get beat deep and give up a TD on a 3 minute drive than to hold them to a field goal on an 8 minute grinder. At least then the offense gets more possessions. And maybe we’ll see a bit of a shift in that direction this year.

by willyduer on Aug 24, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, was it really 27 points a game?

O…M…G.

DevilsReject, I generally agree, but I think the thing missing is cooperation from other teams (no joke, I’ll explain below) and TOs. We NEED to get the damn ball more, one way or another. Our DEs do a fine job, probably the best in the league for their position, at forcing fumbles. Recovering them is probably slightly better than 50/50 since we have an attacking D man on scene, maybe more, and a QB who is standing upright and slightly unprepared. We need to generate INTs—you’d think great DL pressure would help, but not quite enough.

Regarding other teams cooperating, what I mean mostly is “hey, it’s 3rd and 4, let’s pass” or “it’s second and 10, let’s go long.” Instead, we get a LOT of 3rd and 2 situations, or even more frustrating, 3rd and 5 where they run and GET the 1st down. WTF? Arrrrgh! We’re set up, on both sides of the ball, to pressure the opponents to pass. It just hasn’t quite worked right. 2005 and 2007 were stellar years, IIRC. A solid DT rotation this year and health in the secondary should produce similar results.

I love the Tampa 2, and I love the fact that we NEVER blitz, if only because it makes our blitzes (in theory, at least) more efficient and productive because they are less expected. but maybe, just maybe, making the opponents guess on every snap (will they? won’t they? did I remember to take out the trash?) is more effective. Seems to work for Pitt, and a host of 3-4/3-4-hybrid teams (different personnel, of course).

So three cheers for Meeks and Dungy, and cautiously, 3.25 cheers for Coyer!

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Aug 24, 2009 4:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I took out the trash last time

it’s your turn now

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Aug 24, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, I did the laundry!

I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.

by Bobman on Aug 25, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Aggressive mindset should be mixed with cautious approach

One thing is, Coyer never had the pass rush like he has now in Denver and his tenure ended in 2006. He was kinda forced to blitz to produce more pressure. So, anyone expecting blitzes from DBs should tone down their expectations a bit. Plus, our D-personnel were drafted with the Tampa 2 in mind. So, expect some LB blitzing and some stand up DL blitzing, and nothing more and it will be unexpected since we never do it in the first place. If we took last year’s D and reduced our opponent 3rd down conversion by 10%, we’d probably be a top 10 D. That is how much 3rd down hurt us last year.

Whether it was opponents running more than passing against us, or whether it was Tampa 2 where you kept everything in front of you and the angles got squeezed as you got close to the end zone, the 8 pass TDs that our team gave last year was phenomenal. I doubt that will ever happen again. Higher risk, higher reward, but more the chances of big plays too, IMO.

Aggressive teams like the Ravens, Steelers, Chargers, Giants etc. bank on the fact that the QB, more often than not, will not have the time to exploit the 1-on-1 coverages and may be able to get away with a less than stellar secondary. If you do pick up the blitz, and you have an elite QB, they will burn you.

A few things from last year – Manning and the O being better improved and balanced (meaning improved run O), improved 3rd down conversion on offense, better 3rd down defense, and better run D in the middle of the D-line will help us improve the margins of wins and rest the D’s legs as well. That should add a win or two to last year’s record, IMO.

With this year’s schedule, the Colts better make most out of it to get a #1 or #2 seed in the AFC. Next year, the NFC East and the Chargers (and the entire AFC West) will be waiting for us, not to mention the Steelers and Patriots if they win their division as I expect the Colts to win ours.

by chad72 on Aug 24, 2009 5:21 PM EDT reply actions  

It was...

6 touchdowns given up all year via the pass…

But most of you have basically echo’d my statement….. get the other teams off the field instead of extended drives. If we’re getting stops on 2nd an 8 instead of 2nd and 5, we’re getting into 3rd and long which benefits our defensive scheme…

Bottom line, improve the 3rd down efficiency and we’re set for a title run…otherwise its one and done…

by DevilsReject on Aug 24, 2009 7:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake