Is Ed Johnson really that big of a difference maker?
Last Saturday against the Detroit Lions, Colts coach Jim Caldwell scratched DT Ed Johnson from the game even though he had practiced all week and was healthy enough to play. Mike Chappell explains why:
That was coach Jim Caldwell's plan going into the third preseason game. That game is when conditions most mirror those of the first game of the regular season, and Johnson isn't eligible to play in the Sept. 13 opener against Jacksonville.
"We wanted to look at our team without him,'' Caldwell said.
The result was a Detroit offense that dominated the line of scrimmage in the first half, converting on numerous third down situations and utilizing a diligent running game. So, if Caldwell indeed wanted this game to "mirror those of the first game of the regular season," then the third pre-season game was a complete and utter disaster from an execution standpoint. Even with a bad (and beaten up) offensive line last year, the Jaguars were still able to run the football at will on the Colts. This year, their line is improved, they've added Torry Holt at wide receiver, and David Garrard is healthy.
The the Ed Johnson-less Colts play like they did late Saturday, the Jags might get another 300 yard rushing day.
Now, before we continue, I'll state that I am aware that several Colts starters did not play on defense Saturday. Even though he was healthy, Gary Brackett was held out. Why? Who knows. Maybe they wanted to see if Freddy Keiaho could step in for Brackett. Hopefully, they learned what we learned: Freddy can't play MIKE. Also absent was Bob Sanders, Dwight Freeney, Kelvin Hayden, and Antonio Johnson (for much of the game).
But, as we have seen for years and years, the Colts have a habit of incurring big injuries at inopportune times. This forces key reserves like Daniel Muir, Jordan Senn, Jamie Silva, Matt Giordano, Fili Moala, and Keyunta Dawson to step in and play significant snaps. From what I saw Saturday, many of these same players were terrible doing the most basic, fundamental things all football players should know how to do: Tackle and pursue.
No disrespect to the Lions, but our back-ups should be able to get them off the field, especially in third and long situations. Twice on one drive (which resulted in a Lions TD), the Colts got Daunte Culpepper into third and long (9 and 13, respectively). Twice, Culpepper converted. Back-ups or not, that is unacceptable.
Like many of you, what the first half of last Saturday's game looked like was what every game looked like last year for the Colts. And, just like Saturday's game, the Colts were without Ed Johnson for 90% of the season last year. This begs the question, is Ed really THAT important?
Take a look at 2007, Ed Johnson's rookie year and his first as a starting defensive tackle (a nose tackle then) for the Colts. The Colts defense allowed only 3.8 yards a carry and was #1 in the league in points allowed. They were ranked 15th in run defense, 6th in yards per carry, and 9th in rushing TDs allowed. This allowed their offense to stay on the field longer and have more opportunities to score.
Fast forward to 2008.
The Ed Johnson-less Colts defense was 24th in rushing yards allowed, 19th in rushing TDs scored (18 TDs), and allowed 4.2 yards a carry. They were dead last in forcing offenses in three-and-outs, and were dead last in preventing teams from converting on third down. This contributed to Indy dropping to 13th in points per game on offense, as Peyton Manning had fewer and fewer chances to score points.
Now, other factors did play into the defensive regression of 2008. Bob Sanders missed much of the year (again), and key reserves like Quinn Pitcock were also gone. But since the emergence of Melvin Bullitt, I'm starting to sense that it is not Bob's absence that the Colts cannot do without. It's Big Ed's.
Key to overcoming our reliance on Ed is for reserves like Daniel Muir to stop whiffing on tackles he should make! The Colts also cannot afford to lose Gary Brackett for any length of time either. The defense struggled even more after Brackett went down last December with a broken leg, and the depth behind the MIKE spot is sorely lacking.
It's important to note that there is a very strong possibility that Bob Sanders could start the season on PUP. This would shatter any and all hope of Sanders ever shaking loose the stigma that he is an "injury-prone" player who cannot be relied upon. With the possibility of both Bob and Ed out for Week One, and with key players like Raheem Brock and Antoine Bethea nursing hand injuries, one has to be concerned that this Colts defense is not up to snuff; that they have not improved from last season's disaster.
In any case, after considering all this, I have to say I like how Caldwell ran things last Saturday. I make the comment often that the Colts "do not care about pre-season." The reason I say this is because they often sit starters and play lots of people who will, ultimately, either get cut before the season starts, or are back-ups. For me, the game is "taken seriously" when the starters start and play most of the game. That's why they are starters.
However, it seems Caldwell is looking at how good his team is sans key players like Sanders, Big Ed, and Gary. He seems to be working on shoring up the obvious weaknesses in the event one or several of these key players gets hurt and has to miss time. I applaud that, but make no mistake, if the Colts want to beat the Jags Week One, they cannot have a repeat performance of what we saw in Detroit, back-ups or no.
0 recs |
35 comments
|
Comments
Mike Backup
I think you nailed it, Shoe. Ed is indeed a difference maker. But as far as finding a capable backup for Gary Brackett, the licks I watched Tauiiliili deliver (especially on the goal-line stand), I came away believing that problem got solved. For no bigger than he is (Brackett’s height and weight,btw) he can really lay the wood.
by oldecoltsfan on Sep 1, 2009 11:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tauilili
Agreed, but I’m cautiously optimistic about him. Putting licks on the back-ups for the Detroit Lions is one thing. doing it against the starters for Jacksonville is another.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on Sep 1, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
more on Tauiliili . . . .
Your point is well taken, Shoe, and I wholeheartedly concur. I guess I actually see a whole lot of Gary Brackett in him, clear down to being undrafted and a virtual clone. But you are absolutely right in that he needs to pound MJD like he did that backup fullback for Detroit, then he will have earned his bona fides.
by oldecoltsfan on Sep 1, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jacksonville is more than just the opener
It’s a division game. It may be the opener, but it’s a must-win if we want the South title this year. We can’t go dropping games at Jacksonville and Tennessee like we did last year.
by slash196 on Sep 1, 2009 11:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tauiliili and Humber should both make the roster
I think Tauiliili is more of a weakside linebacker like Sessions. It is no co-incidence that he hits similar to Session too, pretty solid thumper and tackles well.
Both Tauiliili and Humber figure in the top 3 in the pre-season for defensive players in tackles and we sure could use sure handed tacklers.
Humber is more of the coverage guy and that one play in the end zone against the Eagles had “player” written all over him. He is ideal for our MLB to back up Gary Brackett.
If those 2 make our roster, they will immediately improve the tackling. Let us not forget Gary Brackett was an UDFA when we got him.
I can live with Hagler backing Wheeler, but not with Keiaho backing up Brackett. Get Keiaho out of town, please.
by chad72 on Sep 1, 2009 11:41 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tackling 101 . . . .
Maybe training camps should revert to some of the older school physicality. More hitting in general, Oklahoma drills, full pads at least 2 or 3 times a week. Instead of getting refreshers in the preseason games only. Sound fundamentals win games that sloppy talent loses.
Just a thought, although I know the obvious rebuttal revolves around keeping training camp injuries to a minimum.
I’m showing my age, I guess.
by oldecoltsfan on Sep 1, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, you are olde...
I agree completely. Back to basics.
by coltsfanawalt on Sep 1, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Old school tackling
I agree. Fundamentals like tackling have been a problem for the Colts defense for years now. They have a big problem in wrapping up short speedy running backs every time we face them. I know they are worried about getting players injured, but this is basics that they need to address. Totally whiffing running backs is unacceptable for paid professionals. Caldwell and Coyer must address this problem if the defense is to improve and give the offense a chance to stay on the field.
by baller3 on Sep 1, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ve thought this for some time as well. Practice like you pay – tackle. Everytime I see them miss tackles I think about their “no tackle practices” and cringe.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Sep 1, 2009 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wheeler
has missed several tackles this preseason too. I know Caldwell is high on him, but if he misses tackles in bunches when the games count, I don’t care how well he blitzes…I would rather see Hagler in there. Of course if Wheeler plays fundamentally sound AND can blitz and/or play decent in coverage, it will be a HUGE plus.
"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."
by AceOfSpades on Sep 1, 2009 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Ed
I hope that it isn’t all Ed, because we looked awful against the Lions. The freakin’ Lions, of all teams! Jacksonville is a tough first game, I hope we can put it away early and not see a rehash of last years bleed-until-we’re-white policy of yard management.
by clownsaw on Sep 1, 2009 11:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It is a combination of several things
First, Ed Johnson does matter. Next, Clint Sessions did not have his best game, was arm tackling, but we do know what he is capable of, he is more hit than miss, IMO. Gary Brackett has a knack of being at the right spot at the right time, he along with Sessions are our best LB tacklers. Wheeler, I am not sold on yet.
Then, when Marlin Jackson plays extensively, there is a reason he plays the slot, he is one of our sure tacklers, and is close to run support traditionally. That is why I like the selection of Jerraud Powers, he allows Marlin to stay inside and Powers has shown he is capable of playing the Jennings role, just a little better on the outside. That way, our run support from Marlin Jackson does not suffer.
Plus, I am beginning to realize Freeney needs Mathis as much as Mathis needs Freeney on 3rd downs so QBs don’t have the luxury of time as much with both those beasts on the field. Mathis, oh boy, is he underrated or what?
In a nutshell, our LB depth is pathetic unless Tauiliili and Humber make our roster. The whole purpose of the D-line is to create a stalemate situation so that the LBs finish the plays, which the D-line did for the most part but the LBs did not. But then, adding the starters goes a long way in improving the tackling for reasons mentioned above.
by chad72 on Sep 1, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."
by AceOfSpades on Sep 1, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couple thoughts.
It’s preseason. Last year the Lions went 4-0 in the preseason, we went 1-3. We never do better than that. Were the Lions better than us last year? Because their preseason record would’ve indicated so.
Also, I told many people (who were downing the Lions going into this game) that Detroit is not a bad team. They lost a lot of close ones last year, including against us. They just couldn’t finish. They have added many important new pieces this year, and there’s a buzz in Detroit that hasn’t been there in awhile. Most important addition may have been their new coach. Marinelli makes a great assistant, but I believe Shwartz will do well at the helm.
Oh, and it’s preseason.
by coltsfanawalt on Sep 1, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perfect practice makes perfect
I agree it’s only preseason, and we have time to get it together, but just because the games dont count doesn’t mean the team should forget how to tackle. If we were up 21-0 on the Pats or another good team, I would hope that we didn’t just turn on cruise control and go through the motions or else we will lose. My point is that even though the result of the game doesn’t count, the players are still (hopefully) fighting to make the roster so they should, as professionals, be counted on to at least perform the most fundamental tasks like tackling fairly well or else we will have a problem.
"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."
by AceOfSpades on Sep 1, 2009 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Robert Mathis also sat
and Bethea and Marlin played very limited snaps
It was basically a 2nd team D before they started pulling guys.
It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.
by shake n bake on Sep 1, 2009 12:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Keiaho
Not can’t play middle, didn’t play it last week. I don’t know what his problem was, but he has filled in capably in the middle before. He sure as hell did not against the Lions. Very disappointing, and Taulilli most definitely outplayed him. Missed tackles by everyone are a major problem with out defense. Keep heads up and wrap em, youse guys.
by tim55 on Sep 1, 2009 12:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he's played well in the middle once
his rookie year against the Pats
since then he’s been a bad MLB when filling in for Brackett.
It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.
by shake n bake on Sep 1, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fred
I’ve come to expect him to miss tackles and be out of position, but the worst of it was his body language. He didn’t even look like he wanted to be out there. I’m sure he did and I’m way off base, but body language and expression tells a lot about a person.
Watch the tape again and see Keiaho flat out miss a block on a kickoff return (I think it was 2nd half but not sure) that sent a Lions player DIRECTLY into the Colts returner (I think it was Taj) and level him. I think it’s unacceptable for a backup MIKE (really?) to be terrible at his position on the field but also be below average at ST, which is really the only playing action he would get unless there was an injury. With blocks like that, I would prefer our KO return guy let the ball bounce into the endzone and take a knee so we can at least start at the 20 instead of the 14…
"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."
by AceOfSpades on Sep 1, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keiaho/Jags
That home game last year, wasn’t it his penalty on a 4th down play that allowed the Jags to keep their last drive alive and beat us by a field goal?
"You can't defend the perfect throw, what can I say?" Peyton quoting Marino
by Indy Lori on Sep 1, 2009 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yes... it was
cheap penalty on fourth down against freddie.
but i do agree that he hasn’t come along the way people hoped. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him cut..
An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...
by bluegirl on Sep 1, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arrrgh, thanks for the reminder
Crappy crappy phantom penalty. Hey, they happen, but still, it’s like the movie cliche where the sheriff smashes out a guy’s headlights then cites him for driving without headlights—the reciever ran into him and Freddie got flagged.
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Sep 2, 2009 2:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Ed Johnson really that good?
If Ed Johnson is so good, why didn’t another team sign him last year? He was cut by the Colts early in the season and to my knowledge not one team even brought him in to look at. I’m happy he’s back on the Colts, but I just have to wonder how good he can be if NOBODY else wants him.
by Don Booza on Sep 1, 2009 1:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
well his history of off the field issues is probably a big factor, it's why he went undrafted.
and before he switched to UT I would have said scheme fit, but a ~300lb 3 tech is something that a lot of teams would work with.
It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.
by shake n bake on Sep 1, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
off field issues
I know what you are saying, but there’s ALWAYS a team that is willing to take a chance on a player with off field issues. Especially a young guy that comes cheap and has proven he can play DT in the NFL. I’m just shocked nobody else signed him. This tells me that most Colt fans (me included) have overestimated his value.
by Don Booza on Sep 1, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mind Games
1. He is still listed at 296 although he is probably well over 300 now. Maybe teams didn’t want the disgrace of taking on a sub 300 lber and being labelled soft as a result by the media (JK).
2. Polian and Manning told other GMs that if they picked up Johnson, they would kick their a$$es for the next 15 years.
3. Bob Sanders wrote a letter to all teams notifying them of his intent to cause mass destruction in case anyone signed Big Ed. When Bob talks, people listen (except doctors of course).
"I'm looking for Ray Finkle....and a clean pair of shorts."
by AceOfSpades on Sep 1, 2009 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's pretty good and productive
Back then, he was playing NT and was too small, by most teams standards. Even the Cover-2 teams have 300+ pound tackles. There only would have been a few teams that would have been interested in big Ed and they were probably scared off because of his arrest.
Defense is more important than breathing.
by BetterD on Sep 1, 2009 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That bugged me all year as well
The better he plays this year, the more it will bug me. There are no gentlemen here, no GM saying “okay, he’s Bill’s kid, so nobody touch him.” And certainly plenty of jokers willing to sign poor-character guys (over and over again). Ed had good rookie success in Indy, Joe Paterno’s vote of confidence, youth, decent size, and was CHEAP! Why indeed would nobody sign him? I was shocked a year ago (I loved his rookie year) and will be even more shocked by the NFL’s myopia if he matches that performance this year.
Happy, mind you, but shocked as well.
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Sep 2, 2009 2:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you have to give Detroit more credit
They have some legit offensive players this year. Calvin Johnson is a beast and Kevin Smith looks talented. Just saying “It’s Detroit, come on!” is not a fair assesment of their offense.
That being said, the Colts allowed 10 points in the first half. I don’t consider that all too bad considering the players that were missing on defense…and the fact that the offense is still getting in synch.
by yellowsnow on Sep 1, 2009 1:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just remember
that we always struggle against the Jags run game, regardless of who is in on D. Jones Drew always plays us tough. He comes with a more competitive edge than when he plays other teams, IMO, just to show us that we could have had him. Of course, I’d love to hold him to a mediocre game, but it will be tough, and so will the Jags. I think we will win, but definitely think they have the ability to pull off the upset. Yet, I don’t think it is because we are worse on D than we have been, but just because it’s the Jags.
There are a few running backs who pesture us every time they play us. They are MJD, Michael Turner (good riddance), and now Darren Sproles. I think these guys and their teams put our defense through hell no matter who is on the field.
by npb1985 on Sep 1, 2009 1:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What do these RBs all have in common?
All were backups when they did the most damage against us (in my memory). That implies, for me, mental letdown and a coaching failure if it’s the key factor.
Are they all short cannonballs? Sproles is of a lighter build than the other two, no? Would it be ironic that our D is susceptible to the smaller, faster, shiftier guys since that generally has matched a description of our the past half decade—small but fast? The book on a T-2 D is that the bruisers should gash it up the middle but that end-around guys are caught by pursuit and fare less well.
Whatever, I hate them all. What’s the difference between a dead coyote on an Indiana highway, a dead Sproles, a dead MJD, and a dead Michael Turner? Skid marks in front of the coyote.
I hate Joe Namath. That's how long I've been a Colts fan.
by Bobman on Sep 2, 2009 2:39 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Lol.
Colts fans are making me laugh today…it’s a good day.
Rec’d.
Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.
Man, I need a life...
Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I don't want this guy to get anywhere near me.
by Cassieper on Sep 2, 2009 6:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007
by peytonsthebest on Sep 2, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















