Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

Wow! New England Patriots are shipping Richard Seymour to the Oakland Raiders

I am completely and utterly stunned.

Richard Seymour was drafted 6th overall in 2001, the year the Patriots won their first Super Bowl. Since then, he has been the bedrock of an impressive and stout Patriots front. Today, he was shipped to the Oakland Raiders (aka, the fifth level of hell) in exchange for Oakland's first draft pick in 2011.

This off-season, the Patriots have parted ways with Tedy Bruschi, Mike Vrabel, Rodney Harrison, and now Richard Seymour. It also seems they will dump Vince Wolfork sometime in the near future. Unbelievable.

Right now, even with Tom Brady supposedly healthy, the Patriots cannot be the favorite to win their division. Richard Seymour, Mike Vrabel, and Rodney Harrison are people one simply does not "replace." These players were the backbone of a team that won 16 regular season games just two seasons ago. And while players like Jerod Mayo and (possibly) Ron Brace offer tremendous potential, right now they are NOT the players that helped build the formidable Patriots teams of the early 2000s.

FYI folks, if the Colts had lost Bob Sanders, Gary Brackett, Dwight Freeney, and Robert Mathis this off-season, literally NO ONE would take the Colts seriously as a playoff team. This off-season, Patriots traded away or lost talent on par with the Colts players I just listed. Yet, I highly doubt the douchebags at Bristol will write off the Pats the way they write off every other team that loses key players.

It will be very interesting to see what kind of Patriots team will get fielded in 2009. As of right now, it seems their defense will not be as good as year's past, which will force them to score points.

Tip to lefpsyd for FanShotting the story.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

from my (deleted) fanpost

I like the deal. Sure the Raiders gave up an eventual first rounder for a play about to turn 30 with an expiring contract (though with the money Al Davis throws around Seymour is unlikely to walk), but the Patriots gave up a high quality starter and won’t see a return for it for two years (or one year at the most if they move the pick). The Patriots are worse off this year and likely next.

This is the type of move you can do when you have Belichick’s job security. The Pats will be contenders for a long time, but they are now a less dangerous team this year.

It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.

by shake n bake on Sep 6, 2009 11:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

It’s a dumb move for Oakland because Seymour will not re-sign with them. Why they traded for him without insisting on a contract extension… I don’t know. However, dumping Seymour NOW, after pre-season has just ended, will make things very difficult for NE in 2009.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Sep 6, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Difficult times for NE

makes me pretty happy :-)

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is how I fell in love with Family Guy. Only 1 question: Where did he get the flamethrower?

by Cassieper on Sep 6, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah no kidding

Seymour isn’t a moron. He’ll have enough of a market to sign somewhere else. Sane people should take less to stay away from Oakland.

Total steal for the Pats, since he’s not as useful with their switch towards more 4-3. And I almost feel bad for the guy, getting stuck going out to Oakland. OK, not really…

This could end up being a top 10 pick for the Patriots. That’s not so nice. So uh… go Raiders?

by willyduer on Sep 6, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure why anyone would feel bad for Seymour...

This kind of stuff happens in the NBA all the time.

$20 bucks says that Seymour will be back in NE in 2010.

Al Davis just screwed himself again.

by shep31 on Sep 8, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is tricky

Jarvis Green (Who’ll now start at DE) is a solid player, but Seymour is one of the best if not the best 3-4 end in the league. Two 1st round picks are a nice thing to have I suppose, but this will weaken their D a bit.

As for the Raiders, don’t they run a 4-3 anyway? Are they moving him to DT or something? They mortgaged the future for a guy in the last year in his deal.

I don’t like this deal for either side.

Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!

by MrNFL on Sep 6, 2009 12:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Seymour has been injury prone the last few years. This move isn’t shocking to me and naturally the Patriots came out on top. Seymour is NOT worth a first round pick, wow.

by KingRichard on Sep 6, 2009 12:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh, it also doesn’t help that the Raiders don’t even have a need for a 5-tech since they run a 4-3 defense. So this makes even less sense to me now.

by KingRichard on Sep 6, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

well to most of the league a 1st rounder 2 drafts away is counted like a 2nd rounder

but to someone will Belichick’s job security a 1st rounder is probably just a 1st rounder.

It's not just your perceptions that can be wrong. Even your memory is often incomplete or possibly flat out wrong.

by shake n bake on Sep 6, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seymour

I like the move for NE. He is a very good 34 end, but they are using a lot more of the 43 these days. He knows his team, maybe he doesn’t see them as having SuperBowl contention in them and took the bait. They could need cap room to lock up Wilfork, the uncapped year not withstanding. And hell they get a high pick for a guy about to turn 30!

My guess is Oakland will use him at DT in 43.

by GonzoBlue on Sep 6, 2009 12:13 PM EDT reply actions  

He'll then end up signing with NE!

And Oakland would then have traded a #1 for a compensatory 3rd. Nice move Oakland!

by GonzoBlue on Sep 6, 2009 12:28 PM EDT reply actions  

When the cat is away the mouse come out to play

Have you guys noticed that all these moves came after Scott Pioli left for the chiefs.

by colt29 on Sep 6, 2009 12:33 PM EDT reply actions  

An interesting move

I can tell you I was pretty shocked. Richard Seymour has been with the Pats since 2001 and a staple at DE for so long. As a fan, I’m bummed but from a business sense, this makes some sense. $3.685 million in cap space frees up, we get a first rounder in 2011, and NE already has some depth at DL. Now, I will agree that Seymour had the best chops on the line, so it remains to be seen if the new blood can do well. Maybe this was a bit too “long term”.

However, an interesting tidbit is the Pats have been experimenting with a 4-3 alignment and many think they’ll be switching due to a weak LB corp, especially in pass rushing. This will be an interesting year.

Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit

by MaPatsFan on Sep 6, 2009 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Agree

Belichick is pretty good at pulling the trigger at the right time on a player, too. Usually he is the one getting the veteran and not trading one away. In the long run it will probably help NE a lot, but will be a little taxing on their new guys this year though.

"Put him on the board. Houshmazilli....got it. CHAMPIONSHIP!"

by AceOfSpades on Sep 6, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

WHOA!!!

like i said be4 in another post the Pats are just making it to easy 4 peyton now

by Livemaxxx on Sep 6, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Don't count on it

We have rarely seen Pats trades in which they come out on bottom, especially with the Raiders.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Sep 6, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't get ahead of yourself

NE isn’t the only other contender in the AFC and the Colts will likely still need to win a playoff game to get to NE (if they face each other in the postseason) so let’s take it one step at a time.

"Put him on the board. Houshmazilli....got it. CHAMPIONSHIP!"

by AceOfSpades on Sep 6, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Patriots

They drafted about 15 DTs this year, so the move makes sense for them. The Raiders just happened to be a team that fell for it. Seymour is probably still going to be a good player, but not worth a 1st rounder.

"Put him on the board. Houshmazilli....got it. CHAMPIONSHIP!"

by AceOfSpades on Sep 6, 2009 1:31 PM EDT reply actions  

haha BBS you are unbelievable.

You will simply flip everything you can to try and take a shot at the Patriots.

I am sure if I wanted to I could waste my time, go through the archives and find posts where you said Harrison, Bruschi and Vrabel were past their prime but now suddenly to fit your pats trashtalk they are still key players and New England is doomed without them. You have railed on how their D has been getting so old and is junk (I do think their pass D is bad) yet now that they have let go some of that age to rebuild suddenly it is a negative.

Give it a rest already.

You should run for a political position since you have the flip flopping aspect down as good as anyone and the ability to say what you think others want to hear. The beauty is I honestly doubt you see how pathetic you are with this stuff though I am sure everyone else does (whether they wish to make it public), save for the little lemmings who jack it to your borderline Colts propaganda.

As stated by basically everyone who has commented, the pats will come away out on top with this just like they always do and as a Colts fan that bugs me but at the same time NOTHING stops Indy from being shrewd like this other than the fact Belichick & co are simply smarter than Polian & co and no matter how much I may not want that to be true it is what it is and the evidence supports this. Now will this move probably hurt them a bit this year? Sure it will but it seems clear they are looking towards the future and feel confident they can manage without him. I also bet you they do win their division because they have proven they know how to deal with player personnel. No doubt if they do win the East I am sure you’ll be here in December writing posts rationalizing why they did rather than just accepting they are a good organization. After all, you were one who back in 07 said the Moss move would blow up on them…yep, really blew up on them.

Just as much as you bitch and whine about espn showing their Pats favouritism you are EXACTLY the same in how you will criticize them at every turn meaning both come off as incredibly annoying and flat out stupid to do.

I don’t even know why I am wasting my time writing this since you are clearly too dumb to actually get it as are any people who will read this, defend you and trash me. You’re pretty much like 97% of the internet bloggers out there who have full on low intelligence and are too dumb to realize it and thus spew forth drivel and think they are sounding intelligent doing so. When people call them out, instead of actually THINKING about what is being said, they just pass it off, and circle jerk it with their “fans” and keep being ignorant. I can’t imagine living my life where I would simply be oblivious to my shortcomings.

If by some miracle I am wrong and you actually do not have low/borderline avg intelligence and can process this then why not in the future change your style and try and be a bit less biased? Trust me, everyone will be better off for it that actually reads this site. Do you really think Colts fans who frequent this site need your bias to still be fans? Do you think that admitting Indy isn’t the be-all, end-all to the nfl and the Pats aren’t the work of the devil somehow makes you less of an Indy fan?

Just for 2 minutes I’d like to be able to use your brain and see what it is like having the thought process of a low to MAYBE an average intelligence human where bias and emotion reign supreme. I’d then like you to have mine so you could see how ridiculous you, and others who think just like you, sound when you type or say your crap.

I will now go back into avoiding this site like I have been for as long as I have since there is no point in trying to discuss crap with people who simply do not have the mental capacity to get it and really, I do not mean that as a bad thing since you low intelligence people didn’t choose to be that way and were merely born with inferior brains.

Don’t even waste your time replying since I will not ever read it as there is no point for me to waste my time trying to argue with those who can’t see reality. It’d be like you arguing with a 3 yr old…no matter what you say they will simply never get it and nothing is gained.

So take this as some constructive criticism or merely take the classic human approach and say “whatever” (the sign of the impending idiocracy) and think I’m an idiot. I really don’t give a crap.

by loregnum on Sep 6, 2009 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

That was... entertaining

What was wrong with BBS’s analysis? He was saying that the Pats have made a number of strange moves this offseason, and that this move does not help the Patriots’ prospects this season. The draft pick was for 2011, so NE will not see any benefit from this trade until the 2011 season, two years from now. In the long term, this trade could be beneficial to the Pats, but in the short term it probably will only hurt them. This post was not biased at all; BBS is right that the Pats have more potential than proven performance on their defense, and that similar moves by the Colts would lead to their being discounted as playoff contenders by the media. Indeed, you could pretty much say the same thing about any other team: imagine if the Steelers had shipped off Troy Polamalu, James Harrison, Lamarr Woodley and Aaron Smith this offseason. We’d be forecast to finish 7-9 and 3rd in our division. Oh, wait, Bucky Brooks already predicted that.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte

by LV Steelers Fan on Sep 6, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bucky Brooks

He really seems like a stand-up guy.

"Put him on the board. Houshmazilli....got it. CHAMPIONSHIP!"

by AceOfSpades on Sep 6, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pats D
BBS is right that the Pats have more potential than proven performance on their defense

I think this is a fair statement (yes, I left out the other part of the quote regarding the Colts getting lambasted if they did the same :-)).

JohnPaul, in a comment below, does a nice job of summing up the move. The point about 4-3 is probably most prevalent to me. Seymour is not a 4-3 guy and NE appears to be moving in that direction.

Blogger at SBNation's Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit

by MaPatsFan on Sep 6, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually

Seymour is a 4-3 guy. He’d be great as a UT.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Sep 6, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

was

He hasn’t really played it much in years. While he slid in sometimes, he often left the field when they’d switch to 4-3 looks.

I think he can be fine at UT, but maybe he wasn’t doing well plugging holes anymore or something. Who knows. Hell, he could be awesome though, but anything short of the 2nd coming of Haynesworth is still a pretty easy trade for a 1st rounder at age 30. Put it this way. Would you trade Raheem Brock for a first rounder? How about any of our other DTs? Easy call, right?

by willyduer on Sep 6, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a fair statement, but...

that’s also not an insult.

And I think that with regards to Bruschi, Harrison, and to some extent Seymour, that statement could be flipped around to say that they are overrated due to their history and are clearly on the decline.

This was true mostly of Bruschi, but Harrison wasn’t a superstar at the end (and they were playing a lot without him too) and Seymour hasn’t stood out for a while either.

That’s nto to say they were awful, but the Pats did a really good job selling high in this case. They’ll be fine without him and now they just stole a first round pick.

by willyduer on Sep 6, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uh oh

all this talk about circle jerks is making me tired.

"Put him on the board. Houshmazilli....got it. CHAMPIONSHIP!"

by AceOfSpades on Sep 6, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Point taken on the biased analysis

but the personal attacks on BBS’ intelligence are unnecessary, not to mention dead wrong

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Sep 6, 2009 2:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I love this troll! Can we keep him please?

My favorite part was this:

will now go back into avoiding this site like I have been for as long[/QUOTE]

when he obviously reads this site everyday for the past couple years as he was able to talk about BBS’s articles.

by MarkFive05 on Sep 6, 2009 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

loregnum....

You are such a turd merchant. Have some anger management issues, do ya? Just as you don’t give a crap. I don’t give a crap what you have to say. Why wouldn’t you expect BBS to have a little bias for the Colts? He’s the head writer on this site. Makes sense, doesn’t it? Personally, I’m glad he’s a Colts fan! And, I’d be willing to bet you aren’t. Sheeshshshsh! Do us a favor, stay off the site a good while longer.

by Ayrshire on Sep 6, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I AM THE ALMIGHTY LOREGNUM!

FEAR MY MIGHTY BRAIN, PATHETIC BLOGGERS!

"Flying blind on a rocket cycle?" -Vultan, from the movie "Flash Gordon", for no particular reason...

by peytonsurdaddy on Sep 6, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

LMAO!

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Sep 6, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

view from a Pats fan

Typical brilliant Pats move. That might sound shocking but this made all the sense in the world. There’s no doubt Seymour is a very, very good player still. However:

1. He’s 30 years old (well technically, he’ll hit 30 in a few weeks but close enough).
2. He’s been plagued by injuries the last several season so there are concerns about his ability to play a 16-game season.
3. While still very good, there is a sense his skills are on the decline (perhaps due to #1 and #2)
4. The team is playing a lot more 4-3 (some rumors are even that the team will be switching to 4-3 as their primary look).

And most importantly…

5. He’s a FA at the end of the season and there was no way—zilch—that we were going to be able to re-sign him. Too many FA’s for us this year and not enough money to go around, and Seymour was at the lower end of the priority scale compared to people like Wilfork.

So rather than get one more (hopefully) good year out of him and then watch him walk away getting nothing in return, instead we trade him and get a first round pick. Not only that, a 1st round pick from a perennially lousy team with an owner who belongs in the looney farm and a coach who might be going to jail for assault.

BUT EVEN MORE THAN THAT… a 1st round pick, from a lousy team, in the draft year that is (almost certainly) going to be the first draft in modern NFL history THAT IS GOING TO HAVE A ROOKIE PAY SCALE IN PLACE!

I can guarantee you, we got a #1 in 2011 rather than 2010 not because of Oakland’s unwillingness to give us their 2010 pick… but because we asked for the 2011 pick instead. We’re gonna have a top-10 pick and not have to pay him like one. Brilliant move.

by JohnPaul on Sep 6, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Too early to call it "brilliant"

but it makes sense, especially if the Pats are moving to more of a 4-3 which is clear since they have moved some of the key 3-4 players that have established their veteran defense over the years.

We can revisit this in November or December of 2011 after that 1st round pick has been made and is playing for the Pats to see if it was a good move or a brilliant move.

"Put him on the board. Houshmazilli....got it. CHAMPIONSHIP!"

by AceOfSpades on Sep 6, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

and this is one reason why I loathe the Patriots

because their front office gets away with murder, lol

by MarkFive05 on Sep 6, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

If this were FFL I would have asked the commish to veto this trade as too lopsided in the Pats’ favor. What are the odds this is a top 5 pick? 90%? I hate the Pats. Yes, I’m jealous.

Polian needs to add “Exploit the Cluelessness of the Raiders” to his GM agenda if we’re going to keep up with the Patriots. The Radiers are like a mini-draft of their own. Their players and picks are on the market for crap at any and all times.

by shoein on Sep 6, 2009 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally agree

Goodell needs to disallow any further Raider/Patriot trades. How in the hell does Al Davis not realize he’s getting hosed. A freakin’ 30 year old dlineman for a top ten pick. Guess what? I’d bet you dollars to donuts that there’s a slotted system in play by then giving the pick even more value. I think this is a great move by New England.

by Merr on Sep 7, 2009 7:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow JohnPaul

Very coherent post, with great points. Plus the fact that you didn’t find it necessary to paint everyone on this site as “low to Maybe average” intelligence, while trying to sell yourself as some kind of rocket scientist. I find it quite refreshing.

by tim55 on Sep 6, 2009 2:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Still Contenders

This trade is typical of Belichick and the Patriots. They may sacrifice some games this year, yet I image NE will be a top contender for their conference championship for the next two years. They really know how to leverage their players for future top draft choices better than most teams today.

by baller3 on Sep 6, 2009 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Let me ask you something

If the Patriots had not traded Seymour and gone into the season with him only to lose him in Week One for the season, would you still call them “contenders.”

No offense (and maybe I’m wrong about this), but if anyone told me last January that the Patriots would enter the 2009 season minus Tedy Bruschi, Rodney Harrison, Mike Vrabel, and Richard Seymour, not one person here would be calling them “contenders.”

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Sep 6, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure we would

That team has always played solid defense as a team, using a great scheme, excellent coaching, and good execution, rather than the performances of one or two gamebreakers. Just as we always got upset as Colts fans to see Brady get too much credit for their early super bowls when indeed it was the defense doing most of the work, it’s also a bit unfair to say their defense revolves around those guys.

Two or three years ago that was true, because these guys were younger and better. But they’re all old and declining. Vrabel was hardly a threat last year, and that was reflected in his trade value. Seymour is more important, but they’ll do just fine without him.

These Pats are different from the early decade Pats, in that I don’t expect them to win with a suffocating defense, but i don’t expect them to be winning their games 38-35 all the time either. They’re still the clear favorites in that division, in my mind. I’m apparently higher on the Jets than most, but even I think that at best they’ll go 10-6, which is much better than Miami or Buffalo will do. They’ll coast to the East title.

by willyduer on Sep 6, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pats fan's POV

Everything JohnPaul said I would pretty much agree with, though I’m still in a bit of shock. Another point I would like to add is that with the situation they are in with Wilfork, combined with #5, it is not feasible for the Patriots to keep both. Therefore, they made a good move by preventing a would-be messy situation from happening heading into the next offseason.

Beer is good! And stuff!

by R_Adragna on Sep 6, 2009 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

addition by subtraction.

is that vrabel showed serious decline last year, bruschi had lost almost all lateral mobility, and rodney harrison was slow and unhealthy. in short, all three were WAY past their prime.
so losing those three guys is nothing at all like losing sanders, brackett, and mathis – or polamalu, harrison, and woodley for that matter.

seymour is still a very good player, and while this move certainly does make business sense for the pats, he’ll surely be missed…

but they’re still the clear favorites in their division. who’s better? buffalo’s a train wreck. the jets have a rookie qb and serious questions at wr. i’m not sold on a miami squad with an incredibly difficult schedule and questions at a handful of positions…. the pats almost have to be favorites by default. i’m not buying them as clear cut superbowl favorites, but they have to be favored to win the afc east.

by saintnixon on Sep 6, 2009 2:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I thought they already won this years Super Bowl?

Didn’t they cancel the season already and just declare it?

"Put him on the board. Houshmazilli....got it. CHAMPIONSHIP!"

by AceOfSpades on Sep 6, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah. these games are just a formality. the lombardi trophy is already in boston, stored in the same utility closet where bellichick keeps his high-tech video equipment.

by saintnixon on Sep 6, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crybaby

Wah wah wah. Aren’t you over looking for excuses for why they are so good? Jealousy is a terrible thing, and when YOUR team doesn’t do well, might as well come up with excuses.

by boomerst3 on Sep 6, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

cheating cheaters love to make excuses.

go back to southy, foreigner.

and jealous about what? the fact that you have the second best qb in the league? the fact that the colts have won a superbowl more recently? your wicked awesome accents?

by saintnixon on Sep 6, 2009 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

to the use of the word “wicked”

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Sep 6, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

psst… it’s “southie”

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Sep 8, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good move by the Pats for the long term but...

…in the short term, I expect the Colts to play either the Chargers or Steelers in the AFCCG this year.

This year, schedule wise, I think the Colts have a good chance to win the division and finish #1 or #2 in the AFC.

Here is to ring #2 for Manning and the Colts:-).

by chad72 on Sep 6, 2009 2:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I wouldn't mind playing the Colts

but it would have to be in the divisional round. The only way for the Steelers to completely exorcise their New England demons would be to face the Pats in the AFCCG.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte

by LV Steelers Fan on Sep 6, 2009 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

But if the Steelers played the Colts

in the divisional round, there’s no way the Steelers get to the AFC Championship game, thus no way to exorcise your New England demons.

However, we’ll be fine with the Steelers beating up on the Pats in the divisional or wildcard round. See, we’ve already exorcised our New England demons.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is how I fell in love with Family Guy. Only 1 question: Where did he get the flamethrower?

by Cassieper on Sep 6, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seymour trade

Lot of things going on here. Seymour’s age and declining skills, although still very good, final year of his contract, high current salary, and lots of replacements parts . Added together, and it is time for him to go while the Patriots can still get some value for him.
The same was true of Vrabel. Declining skills and high salary made him dispensable. Rodney Harrison and Tedy Bruschi were different. Their age lead to declining skills, and Rodney has had a lot of injuries lately and missed a lot of games the last 2 years. He played with abandon and his body could not take it anymore. Tedy was behind others on the depth chart.
But this is why the Patriots have been able to be so good for so long, unlike other teams. They are willing to trade or cut long time and popular players while they have trade value, or to simply let them go out with dignity like Harrison and Bruschi, rather than sit on the bench as 2nd and 3rd stringers, taking up cap space as well.
So while there may be a short term loss of Seymour’s skills, they are stocking up for the future in a year where they will not have to pay ridiculous salaries to an unproven 1st round draft pick. Remember, this is the same team that opted out of 2 1st round picks in the last draft, to end up getting a player in the 2nd round that many thought could go in the first round, while picking up more picks for dropping back. Only time will tell, but Patriots have a lot of defensive linemen to step in this year.

by boomerst3 on Sep 6, 2009 2:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Pats trade of Seymour

Now they have cap space to get a quality back up QB, and sign some of their other guys whose contracts are up this year

by boomerst3 on Sep 6, 2009 3:04 PM EDT reply actions  

My guess

Is this trade will look really good in 2011 but right now it just shows that the Pats D is going to be what can keep them from making it to the Super Bowl. They have the best offense in the league, but that defense is very young and the corners are mediocre. This will be a fun year.

"I saw a commercial on late night TV, it said,'Forget everything you know about slipcovers.' So I did. And it was a load off my mind. Then the commercial tried to sell me slipcovers, and I didn't know what the hell they were."
-Mitch Hedberg

by Colts Homer on Sep 6, 2009 3:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm still in shock over it

but it shouldn’t have surprised me, the main point considered is Seymour’s contract was up and they didn’t want to let him walk without getting any value for him. I knew the Pats weren’t going to re-sign him, but really thought he’d play this year. You can’t judge Seymour by his stats alone, he’s a much better player than can be seen on paper.

What I’m hoping is that this means Vince Wilfork gets paid. Wilfork and Logan Mankins are the top two whose contracts expire this year that I want to see signed.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Sep 6, 2009 4:06 PM EDT reply actions  

all joking aside

this was a really astute move on the part of the cheat. wilfork is the lynchpin of that d and mankins is one of the better o-linemen in the league.

by saintnixon on Sep 6, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just got back from the mall with my girlfriend. I spent over an hour in the sports memorabilia store drooling over everything I can’t afford and was thinking about this trade. All I have to say is Belichick is a craft little sob. This trade was genius. You will never know how much it pains me to say this, but god I wish Polian would pull a trade like this out of his ass one of these days. I know of a few players I’d like see traded for a couple first round picks.

by KingRichard on Sep 6, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions  

He did osmething like it

with Booger in 2006. Hey, it helped us win a Super Bowl.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is how I fell in love with Family Guy. Only 1 question: Where did he get the flamethrower?

by Cassieper on Sep 6, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

*something like it

Two words: Spell Check.

Now a proud annoyance on Stampede Blue, 18to88, Indy Football Report, and Phil B's blog.

Man, I need a life...

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is how I fell in love with Family Guy. Only 1 question: Where did he get the flamethrower?

by Cassieper on Sep 6, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was definitely surprised by this. If I was him i’d be pissed that they traded me to the raiders they suck bigtime

Colts/Pacers/Irish/Hoosiers/Whitesox/Blackhawks/MMA thats it!!!!!

by irishjosh on Sep 8, 2009 2:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Stats Prove It: Brady Is Now a Choker

Recent FanPosts

Small
Coaching staff finalized today...
Small
How to build a championship team
Small
Two more colts assistants
Small
Co-existence
Img_0497-comp_small
Colts Mock Draft
Small
Tony Ugoh
Small
Jim Irsay on Peyton Manning Last Week
Small
next years' starting lineup
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Small
Colts Mock 1.0

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Photo_small nopuntintended

Colts_small emiller17

Sbmanning_small Stew Blake