Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

Momentum in the NFL playoffs is indeed over-rated

Coming into the AFC and NFC Divisional games, no two teams were hotter than the Dallas Cowboys and the San Diego Chargers. Heck, some were saying that "momentum" would propel the the Baltimore Ravens past the Indianapolis Colts.

In both the media and in fan circles, the talk of momentum was as loud as any other subject. In fact, the chatter was so intense that the battle was not simply between the Vikings and the Cowboys or the Colts and the Ravens. The battle was an ideological battle between "resting starters" and "building momentum." Coaches and players got into the discussion, weighing in on one side or the other.

The "immortal" Michael David Smith, via the Wall Street Journal:

This year's two hottest teams—the San Diego Chargers and Philadelphia Eagles—have a chance to enter the playoffs having won at least their last five. Teams with that kind of momentum usually do very well when the playoffs...

Star-Telegram:

Confident Dallas Cowboys ride momentum into playoffs

"That’s the way to go into the playoffs," Phillips said. "We still have the playoffs to go, but I think that’s the way you need to go into the playoffs. We certainly couldn’t go in on a higher note. People are going to keep coming back to [the past] unless you do something about it. This team did something about it."

NY Times:

The Chargers were rested and ready, they were playing the best football in the N.F.L., and they believed they had a coach who knew how to win in the playoffs.

Bolt Hype:

The 2009 NFL season is quickly coming to a close, but the Chargers aren't done just yet. We move away from Week 16 and approach the final game of the regular season this Sunday, with the Chargers full of momentum as they head into the playoffs.

ESPN's NFC North blog:

When someone mentions "Big Mo," I always think of a former baseball slugger. In football, however, it refers to another opaque entity: momentum.

You’re hearing that word bandied about regularly as we approach the NFL playoffs, perhaps in no division more than the NFC North. Our two playoff teams are going in opposite directions, and the debate is on as to whether their late-season performances will impact their postseason run. How much importance should we place on Minnesota’s 1-3 record in December? What does Green Bay’s 3-1 mark over the same stretch indicate?

BaltimoreRavens.com:

Colts' Rest vs. Ravens' Momentum

The Colts believe they will be fine after all that rest, which includes the bye that comes with the No. 1 seed. They will certainly be healthy, as key players such as defensive ends Dwight Freeney (abdominal) and Robert Mathis (quadriceps) were able to nurse themselves back to full strength.

In Indianapolis' case, they thought it would be better to turn it off down the stretch once home-field advantage was secured.

Of course, there are two sides to that argument.

"There's something to be said for coasting in, because obviously, you've earned that right to do that," said Ravens head coach John Harbaugh last week. "You've gotten to the point where you've won a lot of football games up to that point, where you were able to rest some people. I think there's an advantage to that.

"There's an advantage to having to fight your way in. If you look at the history, probably, of who's won the World Championship, you've seen it come from both places, right?"

Final scores:

Colts 20 - Ravens 3

Vikings 34 - Cowboys 3

Jets 17 - Chargers 14

January 17, 2010: The day "momentum" died.

One of the truly great things about sports is that the play on the field will often end all arguments. The play will prove or debunk all theories. There is a certain finality to (duh) the final score, and when the final score throws monkey poop in the face of the whole "you have to have momentum going into the playoffs," look for the talking heads and coaching idiots who trumpeted that "theory" to run and stick their heads in the sand.

And it was not just this season where "momentum" was shown up to be the fool's gold it is. At the start of last season's playoffs, no team looked worse heading into the tournament than the Arizona Cardinals. They'd been blown out in multiple games down the stretch, and had rested starters two games prior to the end of the regular season. Contrast this with our Colts, who won nine straight games going into the post-season.

Cardinals went to the Super Bowl while the Colts lost in the Wild Card.

Despite this, the subject of momentum popped up again these playoffs, and once again the teams that were, quite simply, better than the perceived teams with "momentum" triumphed.

The Vikes destroyed the Cowboys because they were supposed to. The Vikes are better, up and down the roster. The Colts beat the Ravens because they are better. The Saints blasted the Cardinals because... you get the point.

If anything, this weekend gave a small measure of vindication to Bill Polian, who stated way back on December 8th that "momentum is over-rated." People like me laughed off his claim that practice would help keep a team from accumulating "rust" just as well as another team who was playing a real, live NFL football game. I still think there is some truth to the notion that practice cannot simulate the value of a real game, but in the case of momentum v. rest, Bill Polian won the weekend.

More than the Cowboys, Cardinals, Ravens, and Chargers losing this weekend, what truly lost was the over-rated, over-used myth of momentum.

Comment 451 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

What about the Jets Momentum?

Good thoughts but what about the Jets? They came in winning their last 3 games and it could be argued that they are playing with momentum.

Momentum might be overrated but it’s not dead.

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 10:46 AM EST reply actions  

Jets

The Jets don’t need momentum to win. The Jets are good. Momentum does not trump “good.” If momentum were so vital to success, the Chargers, Cowboys, and Ravens would have won. They didn’t. They lost, badly.

Thus, momentum is indeed over-rated. Is it worthless? Of course not. Momentum can certainly help a bit. But is it the be all and end all of deciding factors, which is what pretty much everyone and their grandmother was writing about heading into this weekend? Again, no.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Jan 18, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Completely agree

Momentum can be one factor of service to a team like the Jets with many new faces. But like BBS pointed out here, it’s not THE overriding factor, nor can it operate separate from other issues. All the momentum in the world won’t win you a game if the other team executes better.

And that’s the key: Momentum – actually better thought of as being in rythm, in a “groove”, so to speak – helps teams that don’t have the experience that Indianapolis has to execute well. It helps them stay focused by imposing a predictable element in their routine. But ultimately, wins and losses are decided by who executes better, and “momentum” is only one factor that aids that.

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Jan 18, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I like the words rythm or in a groove when people try to describe what they call momentum. The perception of momentum involves so many things and it is a terrible analogy to what happens in the football field.
Would a team that just won four straight tough match ups entering the playoffs but lost their starting all-star QB in the last quarter of that streak can be said to have momentum? I dont think so.

"If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert"
- DBG

by LasEspuelas on Jan 18, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I will just quote what I posted on another article about momentum, from a Ravens player no less, "momentum is like a rock rolling down a hill it has to stop, I will take confidence everytime.

by Ufanforreal on Jan 18, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I think it was impossible for whatever team that plays the Colts

not to have the media’s version of momentum. If the Chargers won they’d be the hottest team in football and if the Jets won then they have won all those playoff games to reach us. Winning football games = momentum, and you have to win football games to reach this point of the season.

by Hippoboy84 on Jan 18, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t get me wrong. I think the Colts are going to come in ultra-focused and smash the Jets. I’m just saying that the momentum talk won’t stop just because of this past weekend’s games. When the Colts make it to the Super Bowl, then and only then will the mainstream media get the point.

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think that it's pretty safe to say that the "momentum is everything!" meme is dead

Momentum can still help teams, as Naptown said, but it should no longer be looked at as a deciding factor in the playoffs.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte

Stampede Blue's Resident Steelers Fan

Oneil Cousins is the Steelers' best Offensive Lineman
Frank Walker is their best CB.

by LV Steelers Fan on Jan 18, 2010 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Teams with "momentum"

arguably face the most pressure of any in the playoffs, because the idiotic sports media slobbers over them so much and make them out to be unstoppable juggernauts, the teams focus more on “not losing” than winning because they feel they have so much to live up to. This is one of the many reasons whey sports journalism is a complete disgrace nowadays and those who work for networks like ESPN are less qualified to be analysts than average fans are.

The Jets, in my opinion are a slightly worse team than the Ravens, but that doesn’t mean they can’t pose a more viable threat than the birds did. Still, though, the similarities b/w the two are eerie. Both have been deemed as having momentum. The Ravens run game looked unstoppable against the Pats. Their pass game was sub-par. The Jets run game looked unstoppable against SD, while the pass game was sub-par. Both have great D’s with pro bowl caliber players. Many analysts say the Ravens “should have” beat the Colts back in Baltimore in week 11, while those same morons actually say that even with our starters, the Jets played us tough.

The Colts put a stop to the Ravens talk, and should be able to do the same with the Jets talk. Everyone likes a Cinderella story, and the game will be pumped like one by the media. But let’s not overthink this one too much. The Jets played well, but the Chargers played like absolute garbage. Nothing the Jets have done since the Colts game has made me think they are all of the sudden a top-tier juggernaut. They are still as beatable as they were in week 16, and the media is deciding to look past all of Rex Ryan’s coaching mistakes yesterday because Turner’s mistakes made his look like nothing.

The Colts will not take this one lightly like SD did. Of that I am sure.

"A lot of times, Kenny, we have no idea what we're doing. But the DEFENSE doesn't know that we don't know what we're doing.....and that's next level." -Peyton Manning

by npb1985 on Jan 18, 2010 11:20 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

excellent observation npb1985

by kinnickcolt on Jan 18, 2010 11:25 AM EST reply actions  

Over-hyped indeed!

Go Horse!

I was commenting on Stampede Blue long before May of 2008 you freaks....

by peterbones on Jan 18, 2010 11:36 AM EST reply actions  

It appeared...

…as though the Colts, on both sides of the ball, came out a tiny bit flat in the first quarter – a few dropped passes, and slight confusion was apparent on a few plays. Nothing to be concerned with, but flat nonetheless.

At the very least, that was simply my impression.

Without a shred of doubt, however, the Colts awoke from their success-induced, bye-week slumber, in the second quarter. At a minimum, we were unstoppable, and the performance of our boys was exciting!

I must admit – I wanted the Chargers. Badly. Oh well – the Jets will do! GO COLTS!

by The Learned Hand on Jan 18, 2010 11:48 AM EST reply actions  

They looked sharp to me on that

first drive where they got a FG. The Ravens have a good D. Can’t get a TD every drive.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 6:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Another Factor

One thing about our Colts, they have total respect for other teams. I think it was Reggie Wayne who said a few months ago, “We’re all scholarship players”, meaning that all teams deserve to be viewed for the same capabilities as our own. I suspect the Chargers were focussed on the “next game” (the one against us) as opposed to the game they were playing against the Jets (the “backed-into the playoffs” team). Colts take it one game at a time so the Jets will be well in their sites.

Can the Jets win? Of course. Funky things happen on football fields from blown calls, to poor playing to odd ricochets of footballs off feet, helmets, etc. Will the Jets win? Not if the Colts do what they’ve done all season. Give healthy respect to their opponent, focus on THAT opponent (never mind the next game), and play the solid football they have played all season.

The Jets have been playing with heart these past games but Colts always play with heart and always play to the end so I don’t see them folding the way the Bengals and Chargers did in their fourth quarters.

by bluefilly on Jan 18, 2010 11:50 AM EST reply actions  

and this is where the rest will come in

  the Jets have had to play their hardest now since week 16 to be where they are.. They have got to be feeling it, on top of all the travel. I would say they are a more tired battered team than what we saw in week 16, while we are MUCH healthier. The colts were handling the jets fairly well with a number of starters out or only seeing limited action. And I suspect there will be some extra motivation given this is the team that wrecked our perfect season.

An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...

by bluegirl on Jan 18, 2010 12:01 PM EST reply actions  

tweet from brock
Damn I wake up this morning and they already talkn about brett farve playn the jets….no respect lol!

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

Brock is twitter king

Love it.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

He def. is King of twitter

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Wrong

I’ll wait until AFTER the Colts beat the Jets before I agree to any such statement. The Cowboys suck so unbelievably bad in the playoffs anyone would be a fool to base any kind of general trend on a single Cowboys game.

And the Jets are showing just exactly what a team can do when they play full bore, streak into the playoffs and never let up.

So now we see, once and for all how the Rest vs Rust argument shakes out next week. It couldn’t be a more perfect matchup up to finally put this issue to bed.

If the Colts win then Polian et al are vindicated and we can officially kiss any hopes of ever seeing an undefeated season goodby – because Polian will ALWAYS let off the gas for the final one or two weeks.

If the Colts lose AND they lose becaue the offense can’t seem to get a rythem going (they didn’t exactly look on fire against the Ravens) then Polian will be ridiculed for the rest of his career. And we can STILL kiss any hope of seeing an undefeated season goodbye because there is no way in hell that Polian would ever admit he was wrong and change.

All things being equal, I hope Polian is right, the O is rested, and they can somehow shake the rust.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 12:08 PM EST reply actions  

I don't think it's rust

I think this is just how our Indianapolis Colts play the game. They don’t make mistakes, they are fundamentally sound, and they make plays when needed. But they aren’t the same team as they were 3,4,5 or 6 years ago. There are a ton of young players on this team and they will continue to make mistakes like they have all year. But as long as there aren’t stupid penalties or crazy turnovers, Peyton simply will not allow this team to lose.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

By the way

Notice that the Chargers had the week off also, that is a break of momentum in and of itself.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 12:14 PM EST reply actions  

Momentum is uncountable

And good dammit, it’s something so silly. The media bashed us with this “momentum” talk, and what’s the exact definition of it? Being a losing team but do a good campaign in the last couple of games during the regular season? You won’t win games by playing great in the last 5 games of the season. Suck my dick statisticians, cause all I can hear and read from you is crap

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Statistics are an attempt to rationalize the irrational.

In the long view, if done accurately, they will give you a reliable view of what should happen, but in the short term there is too much chance for stastical outlyers. Brett Farve’s interceptions are a perfect example, this year he’s thrown far fewer than normal, but I’ll still bank on a multiple pick performance every week.
On a related note, momentum is about as real as clutch.

by vintagephoenix on Jan 18, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

The actual statistician would never talk about momentum. Is the sports commentators and journalist that try to use statistics and terms they dont understand to describe teams coming into the playoffs. In any case momentum as defined by mainstream media seems to be defined as:
Winning the last few (however many is convenient to be impressive) games prior to the playoffs without resting any of your players.
Momentum in the true sense of the word would be lost instantaneously after a game is over. Who knows, maybe between halves. How many times have we seen a Colts team start a game flat but put it together after half-time or vice-versa?

"If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert"
- DBG

by LasEspuelas on Jan 18, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice

Good post, BBS.

As an aside, I think we should note Caldwell’s decision to hold a more competitive week of practices during the bye. Ones v. Ones was very different from what Dungy had done in the past during bye weeks, and produced great results. 0-2 under Dungy post-bye, 1-0 under Caldwell post-bye. Don’t get me wrong, I love Dungy—he’s a lock Hall of Famer—but I think Caldwell chose the better route for shaking off any rust and keeping the team excited but healthy during the weeks leading up to the divisional round.

by superchimp on Jan 18, 2010 12:32 PM EST reply actions  

Jim Polian

This man built our team, one of the winningest teams of all time, our Colts. So when a hard decision was made to rest starters, he and his staff did with conviction. They believed in it and we should too. After all, Mr. Polian, coach Caldwell, and the entire staff and players are focused, smart and ready. As they will be for the Jets! GO COLTS!!!!!!!

by GGALE on Jan 18, 2010 12:37 PM EST reply actions  

he would of had to correct it for it to be

cass’d

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

It's an inexcusable error.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 6:29 AM EST up reply actions  

"They believed in it and we should too."

Sorry, I never act like sheep. I’ve been a fan of the Colts long before Polian, and will continue to be a fan long after he is gone. His post season record isn’t all that hot – he’s great at building a team and no one can ever take that away – he’s a personelle genius. However, I detest the way he dips into coaching decisions in the post season.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

If that's what I had said then you would have a point

That’s not what I said. The poster I responded to claimed that we should “believe” whatever Polian does because he’s Polian. That is the very definition of sheep and I won’t have my fandom dictated to me thank you very much.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough. I just wanted you to clarify that statement.

You are more than entitled to your opinion, I just didn’t want to read another “them or us” arguement.

by vintagephoenix on Jan 18, 2010 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll add a little opinion to my last statement...

Once upon a time, when ESPN used to do actual reporting and analysis, it was said that older teams benefit more from rest than younger teams. I truly believe this. When you look at who rested, they were mostly vets. In ‘05 these guys were alot younger, maybe we shouldn’t have rested them. I don’t know. Just something else to think about. I say we wait and see how this season shakes out before we come to conclusions.

by vintagephoenix on Jan 18, 2010 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I say we wait and see how this season shakes out before we come to conclusions.

Which is what I said in a post a little earlier. This match-up could either settle the Rest vs Rust debate or blow it wide open. There really couldn’t be a better designed test if the teams had been choosen by hand.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup, and that's why I didn't attack your arguement. I completely agree with the sentiment.

Honestly, even if those of us on the “other side of the discussion” we proven absolutely right I wouldn’t spike the football over it (well, maybe in an open thread, but that’s friendly ball busting, and should be taken about as seriously as I’d take the “fuck you”s I’d get in return). A well thought out arguement is always welcome if I agree with it or not. I just hate the emotional crap.

by vintagephoenix on Jan 18, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Jets

This Jets team is very similar to the Ravens. They have a young quarterback who will be extremely lucky to reach 125 yards passing. They focus on their running game and on their defense. The same 2 things that the Ravens focus on. I think that the one difference between these 2 teams, is that the Ravens had better talent in the running game and on defense. Ray Rice is a much bigger threat than Jones and Greene, and certainly Ray Lewis and Ed Reed are on a different level than most defensive players in the NFL. I think that the Colts can come into this gam with the same game plan and do just fine. As long as we put up some points and avoid turnovers in our own territory, we will be fine. The only way that the Jets can get into scoring position is by benefiting from turnovers. Our Colts will just come out and play their game and be just fine. XLIV here we come!

by The Baseball Freak on Jan 18, 2010 12:38 PM EST reply actions  

I just hope they consider us as a same offensive team like the Chargers

With streak routes and giant WRs who mostly win any kind of coverage, so Rivers can take all the glory just making those passes and laughing at the defensive players faces. Besides, our OL will have to keep protecting Manning like they did the whole regular season, and I really hope they open some good roles to Addai and probably Hart

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Jet fan here.

Jets are similar to the Ravens. Yes. Except we’re better. The Ravens D is not the same as in years past, and actually wasn’t very good. The Jet D is far superior to the Raven D. Don’t sleep on Revis, Harris, Pace and company. And our running game much more physical than the Raven’s. Our O-line is the best in the game and we have an emerging rookie in Greene thats big and fast and physical, as opposed to the shifty Rice and slick McGahee.

The Jets will move the ball against your small D-line. Obviously the game will be decided by the winner of the Chess match btw Rex and Manning. Admittedly, Manning scares us to death. But we will be in the game. I hope its a good one.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

The Jets will move the ball against your small D-line.

Insert Ravens instead of Jets and it’s utterly similar to what Ravens fans said.

If you think size will win the game for you, you will be disappointed.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

The Ravens ran the ball well against you guys but abandoned it.

If you think we’ll abandon the run, no matter the score, you will be disappointed.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

you ran better against us once our starters were taken out. But even before that

look at who didn’t play. for one we didn’t have mathis playing and that will make a big dif. Don’t underestimate our D, we have done well against the run this year. And especially against good backs.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

You're one of the worst teams against the run.

And power running games have smoked you all year.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Huh?

Smoked us? Was that why we had to pull our starters before the incredible Jest had a chance?

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Love ur twist of logic.

On the re-read it will say that power running games have smoked you all year. Meaning your defense can’t stop a power running game. Which the Jets have.

But yes. We beat you.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

UMM re think that. You can not honestly say we haven't beat a power run game.

iMO (9ers, titans, rams maybe) thats off the top of my head.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Rams u didnt. Jackson went off.

Titans are not a power running team with CJ. White got 11 carries for 50+ yards.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Jackson went off in the 4th quarter

When we were up by a gazzilion of points.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Which power running teams

Has beaten our starters this year?

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Who didn't beat our starters

Who has beaten our starters?

You get one more chance.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

umm he did say starters

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Hahahahahaha.

You are funny.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

your hilarious if you think you beat our starters

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

come on get a title lol

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Bla bla bla

Even for Jets fans, the Colts are the underdogs… oh nice!

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

they will be aware of the truth soon enough

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Steven Jackson had 10 carries for 33 yards in the first half – 3,3 ypc.

Thomas Jones had 10 carries for 34 yards in the first half – 3,4 ypc; Greene had 5 carries for 34 yards – 6,8 ypc.

And what did the almighty Jest get out of this? 3 points – well congratulations, you really beat us there… not so much.

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you realize that

the Jets were able to run the ball well after the Colts pulled their starters?! The Jets running game wasn’t doing shit before that!

Peyton Manning makes it Wayne on them hoes!!!!

by KMR24 on Jan 18, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

no he doesn't realize this

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

In the first half of the Week 16 game

the Jets rushed for about 65 yards, very good, but nothing fantastic. They this against a defense missing at least 3 starters. This coming up game, you’re going against Mathis, Powers (a rookie CB better than most vets) and Brackett full time.

 

Peyton Manning makes it Wayne on them hoes!!!!

by KMR24 on Jan 18, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean like...

Miami? Jacksonville twice? Rams?

Those games? Don’t see any other power running games other than those. Please point them out.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Umm miami isn't a power running team at all nor does it have a power running back. most of there yards were

off of wild cat and none of it was because of a power running.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Listen crackhead

The amount of stupidity you have spit at us proves yourself to be so incredibly ignorant, that any comment made by any colts fan, even if it is dumb, still makes you an idiot.

We owned your punk asses in week 16 until we pulled starters and decided that we would allow you into the playoffs. After the Ravens game, and the massacre we will lay upon your team on Sunday, this may be the easiest road to the Super Bowl of any team in a while. Seriously, you all are the George Mason of the NFL playoffs. Nice Cinderella story, but everyone knows you shouldn’t be here, so let the big boys handle it from here on to Miami, kapeesh?

Go back to the meadowlands with your moral victory, you’ve earned it. We’ll thank you for making it so easy when we hold the Lombardi trophy in Miami. Please tell me Rex will have Sanchez spike it on the final drive of the half with a timeout remaining again? I like watching stupid coaching mistakes.

"A lot of times, Kenny, we have no idea what we're doing. But the DEFENSE doesn't know that we don't know what we're doing.....and that's next level." -Peyton Manning

by npb1985 on Jan 18, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

And those teams smoked us?

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Alot of our starters were also inactive for that game.

Don’t feed the troll. Let him enjoy his delusion for a week.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

They ran terribly

They got 87 yards on 19 carries, with 20 yards coming on one of the last carries, which Rice promptly fumbled.

Rex has also really never won a chess match against Manning. He came close in 06, with a far superior defense. He lost that one too. You may hold us to 20, fine. You won’t sniff 20 on offense.

EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Jan 18, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol @ won't sniff 20.

Manning, for all his greatness, is a below avg QB in the post-season. You were lucky to get to 20 against that far inferior Raven defense. They handed you that game and you got bailed out by bad calls for your TD before half. And if you think our backs are gonna juke and jive at scrimage ur nuts (See Charger safety Weddle on Greene TD).

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

WOW your a joke if you believe anything your just wrote

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

they def. made mistakes which would have kept them in it. However

if that didn’t happen we wouln’t have let up and would have scored more. if you watched you could have seen that we could have scored more but especially in the 4th we went to almost all run to work the clock.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

You are a great comedian

Applause.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL @ the Ravens being an inferior defense

You make it sound like the Colts just beat the Chiefs. The Jets might be the #1 defense but the Ravens were #3 in total defense themselves.

The game plan will be the same as it was against the Ravens and the Colts can actually tackle. Even if you can run the ball for over 100 yards, you can’t beat the Colts with a sub-200-yard passing game. Just ask the Miami Dolphins!

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

The team that the Jets beat in week 16 wasn’t the Colts. Congrats on beating our Preseason team.

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

yea you did it againt the backups

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope Rex Ryan has the same thoughts you have

So he can drown himself in his own fat paunch. Why do you always pays attention to the statistics? Maybe you don’t want to realise that this Colts “soft” defense is 8th less scored in the regular season, and handled the “explosive” running offense of Ravens to only 80 yards and 3 points. The Chargers are held to 14 points, but we’re not the Chargers

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

And we're not the Ravens.

It was 15-10 when your team got scared to get hurt and pulled their starters. We think it was a lucky drive, just like you think it was a lucky return. We think it was just a matter of time before we started banging Peyton around just like we did to Painter with the starting offense.

Obviously your coach agreed or he would have left everyone in to get their individual accomplishments and let them sit out all together against Buffalo. If its about getting healthy and staying healthy, why did your guys play in the Buffalo game?

Before you chickened out and spit in the face of history we had you right where we wanted you. Now we get to prove it to the whole country when we punish you on Sunday.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

haha keep wishing, i see nothing about your team that makes me think we would lose to you. actually i am

more confident than ever that we wont.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

You spit at history.

Now the team that you “let” in will eliminate you. How ironic.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

No, we don't

Let’s not whitewash it. We quit on a chance to make history. Winning the Super Bowl won’t change that.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, hopefully the players take it out on the Jets then.

I thought it was one of the smartest moves possible.

If a key player got hurt in the Blizzard you’d be pissed.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

You stick with karma

I’ll stick with talent.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Numbers

If you don’t know what to say, just shut the hell up

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Three series, vs a whole game.

Because we wanted to practice, but watch the touches.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

15-1 or 14-2.

What does it matter? There is no way we are playing in the Blizzard.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like you guys were scared of the Jets then.

Otherwise you would have just played it out.

Makes no sense.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Make no mistake

The players were NOT scared of the Jets. Polian was, the PLAYERS were not. It will be the players out on the field this week, not Polian.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Please

Your team would rather lay down like a cheap whore, than play for immortality.

You pulled guys just to play them again the next week for three lousy series.

Your team was chicken.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

you want us to be scared but we arent and wont

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

no such thing as karma in my book

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Next man in

You can’t play scared when you’re playing football.

Did anyone who was in get hurt? If getting Wayne and Clark to 100 receptions was important enough to play then winning should have been important enough as well.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Still this chit-chat about the week 16?

Bla bla bla

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Stop.

If a key guy got hurt we’d be screwed. There is no way around it.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean like

how we were screwed when Gonzo went down?

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

There is a difference between week 1 injuries and week 17 injuries

It’s called adjustment.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Collie stepped in from day one

And has been performing at a high level ever since

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

no one denied this

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Then why play scared of injuries?

Especially when you are more than willing to play in a blizzard for a couple of “personal records” for Wayne and Clark?

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

personally i didn't think they should have really played in that game at all.

and i didn’t like the timing of them pulling in the jets but you know what the superbowl is more important when it comes down to it. I don’t care if we never go undefeated id rather have superbowl rings

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree.

I want both – and we could have had it this year.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

yes it would have been nice but im over being mad, and

just looking forward to what is coming.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll get over being mad IF

the Colts beat the Jets. If they lose, then I’ll never forgive Polian. Ever. And even if the Colts win the SB it will still be a stining reminder of what COULD have been.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

understandable, i guess i just got over it faster

since my issues were a little dif.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Fuck history

We’ll get another shot, and the Jets? Maybe they’ll start the next season losing in the first game

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

No, we won't get another shot

Polian will do the same thing next time. The Colts will NEVER have an undefeated season as long as Polian is in charge.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Because of Polian screwing with the end of the year

coaching decisions? I’ve been a fan of the Colts through thick and thin – an ass in the front office won’t stop that.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

So you want to take Polian off his position?

The man who led the Colts to 115 victories in this decade and a Superbowl ring (maybe two)? Well, it reminds me we weren’t so fortunate cause our main backup QB was on the IR, and he does a good job at all. And the backup players have won the last game for the Chargers… It’d happen to us

Quitters never win, but cheaters sometimes do

by trOOly on Jan 18, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope

I want him to leave the coaching decisions to Caldwell

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

The Colts will NEVER have an undefeated season...

If you know they will NEVER have one then why are you so upset about week 16. You say right here that as long as Polian is in charge he will always pull the starters so get over it already! You knew he was going to pull them because that’s what happens every year. It was a month ago and now the Colts are going into the AFCCG. GET OVER IT ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!

by leb_03 on Jan 18, 2010 9:50 PM EST up reply actions  

No, I will not get over it

If you don’t want to read my comments then don’t – it’s that simple. But I will not have my fandom dictated to me by someone like you. I will feel as damned upset as I want to for as long as I want to. I quite frankly couldn’t care less if you appriciate that or not.

If the Colts lose to the Jets I will NEVER get over it – ever. Not until I see Polian leashed and kept out of the coaching decisions and kept to doing what he does best: personnel.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 19, 2010 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

You want some cheese

With your whine?

And yes, if you want to whine incessantly about something, we have the right to demean you for it. It is teh law of teh interwebz.

I also wish I had time and motivation to blog at Speed Blue Nation

by Bullard47 on Jan 19, 2010 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats what you keep saying but i just don't see it.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions  

ummm NO your nothing like Miami and

the only thing we had trouble with for miami was the wild cat

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

haha ok whatever

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

wildcat works for Miami because of all the practice time they dedicate to it

you can’t just throw together a package, run it a couple times a game and have it work against a credible D.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

I’ve seen/read all Crackback has had to say about the Jets and I think YOU, my friend, are seriously underestimating the Colts and if the Jets are thinking about the Colts the same way you are, they’ll get smoked next Sunday.

by NYKings on Jan 18, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

By thinking we can play power football?

You haven’t smoked a good team all year. What makes you think you can smoke us now when you couldnt before?

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Smoked 2 playoff teams

one in the playoffs.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

We beat you and your nemesis.

We have every right to feel confident.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

So does Indy.

Actually, you needed a kick return TD to make it a 5 point game, and that’s with Adam missing an extra point.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Because

We knew your team would be the easiest possible opponent in th eplayoffs.

We actually WANT to play you.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

The Jets offense

scored 3 points in 3 quarters.

The Colts offense scored 2 TDs and a FG in 3 quarters.

I’ll say it again…the Jets offense will not score 17 points. It just won’ t happen.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

This is the Playoffs. The Colts Owner, President, and Coach actually want to win this game. Every time the Colts have tried to win a game this season, they’re undefeated.

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Bull spit

You think the players in weeks 16 and 17 weren’t trying to win? If they weren’t, they don’t belong in the NFL.

Go Jets
Go Devils

by FrankG929 on Jan 18, 2010 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice first comment

I like the way you start your “contribution” and your way to detract attention from yourself.

/sarcasm off

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 19, 2010 6:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Just remember

I’m saying the Jets offense won’t score 17. Is a defense/special teams TD possible? Sure.

If the Jets only score points on offense, they will lose.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope, not at all

In fact, if they do, I’ll make a front page story, even if the Colts do win, about how I was completely wrong about it.

By the way, the Jets scored 3 non-offensive TDs all year. 2 were in the Colts game, one on Curtis Painter. I don’t think they can count on those points coming again.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

You do realize

that Manning was not the only starter that was pulled, right? There was no Wayne, Clark, Garcon, Saturday, Diem, Johnson, Lilja either.

If the Jets didn’t win that game, I would have laughed at them uncontrollably.

The Colts scored 2 TDs and a FG against the vaunted Jets defense in less than 3 quarters. I don’t see any scenario where the Jets offense scores 17 points.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Shonn Greene

Don’t underestimate this guy. He knows exactly how to deal with the Colts defense – it is nearly the same identical defense he practiced against while at Iowa.

Yes, I could see them putting up over 20 points – absolutely. Our O will have to bring their A+ game without ANY signs of rust to beat the Jets.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

It won't even take 25

The Jets are undefeated when he has 10 touches or more. He is a real threat.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

"run to win" is getting the causality wrong

winning causes running, not vise versa.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

The Ravens

had 52 carries against the Patriots.

They had 19 against the Colts.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Shonn Greene does scare me

He’s like the Darren Sproles of the Chargers… And I don’t mean they are the same type of player, but what I mean is, both Sproles and Greene are clearly better than the player in front of them on the depth chart, but their teams continue to give valuable touches to inferior players for some unknown reason. If they came out and said Thomas Jones will only get on the field when Shonn Greene is tired, I’d be a lot more ascurred of the Jets’ offense.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

He also

not at Ray Rice’s level either, at least right now.

In the future, it’s certainly possible. Right now though, Rice is a much better back, and the Colts did ok with him.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm all about homerism

But you just lost all your credibility there.

You clearly haven’t watched many Colts games this year, as you keep spouting off about old defenses for the Colts.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I havent watched many but i watched enough to see your small and fast.

We’ll go jumbo and pull Faneca to the right and pound Greene straight up the gut. We’ll play our game, not yours.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Aha

So you haven’t watched the Colts.

That is why you don’t know what you are talking about. It makes sense. You just go to your next opponents stat page instead of actually looking at how they play.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, he is.

If he had had the number of touches Rice had he would have had similar numbers. The man is a war machine who is stronger in the 4th quarter than he is in the first.

Do not underestimate Greene – he will eat you alive.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Greene's greatest asset right now

is that he didn’t have the number of touches Rice had. Meaning he has relatively fresh legs.

I’m not underestimating anyone. Rice > Greene, and the Colts shut down Rice 2 days ago. I feel confident they will do the same to Greene.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Uh....no

Greene runs harder and longer later in the game than early. Being “fresh” has nothing to do with it.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

And Greene smoked the Colts D

The last time they played for nearly 6 ypc and 95 yards in limited play.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Limited play counts for him

but not for the Colts starters? They didn’t play for a little under half the game!

by NYKings on Jan 18, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, they played on Defense

a lot longer than they played on offense. They were only out for the fourth quarter and even then some of them were still in.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok but were Mathis and Powers playing?

No, we’re coming full strength right now with all hands on deck. It’s a totally different ball game. The Jets on the other hand had all their guys in that game and were LOSING when we pulled starters.

by NYKings on Jan 18, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

They didn't play at any point in the game

Excluding TWO players does not disqualify the D as being the “first team.”

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

9 carries, 46 yards

against the “first team” defense.

He had one big run, for 21 yards, tackled by John Gill. That was the only drive the Jets scored offensive points.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

He won't get many carries...

in the second half. It’s going to be hard for the Jets to run when they are down 14 points in the fourth quarter. By the time the fourth quarter rolls around, the Colts will be daring Sanchez to throw the ball. When that happens it’ll be a repeat of Ravens game. Flacco is to Sanchez as Sanchez is to Flacco.

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, it was 55 yards

The first team D came out about a drive or two after the first team O. So that is 55 yards over 2 1/2 quarters. I’ll let you extrapolate the rest.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

It was still

the “first team” defense. When Francisco, Gill, Thomas are playing with Brackett, Muir, etc, it isn’t the real first team.

If the game goes as I think it will, the Colts will be up 2 scores, then I’d be more than happy for the Jets to grind out 8 minute drives in the 4th quarter.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Check that, it was 68 yards through

three quarters. He was still getting 9, 7, and 5 yards per chunk against our first team D late in the third quarter.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Please

“first team” defense.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't think

Brackett, Muir, Hayden, and Wheeler are first team D?

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

They are

but Freeney, Mathis, Brock, Johnson, Powers, Session, Bullitt were not playing.

They are playing now. That is the first team defense.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, they most certainly were playing

And each had made tackles late in the third quarter.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok

scratch Freeney, Brock, and Johnson off.

The other 4 were not playing. They will be on Sunday.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

sorry, i've been freebasing

cane sugar off of a kittens belly

after I go out of my way to pay Greene a compliment, are people really saying that Greene is better than Ray Rice??

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

this is craziness.

I guess if we’re going off of playoff performances, Shonn Greene > Chris Johnson, too

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

But Cedric Benson

must be REALLY good, hell he might even be the best. After all 8 YPC and 169 yards.. against the number 1 defense in the league!

by NYKings on Jan 18, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I was about to ask the same question

Would you trade Greene for Chris Johnson or Adrian Peterson? How about Steven Jackson?

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I lost IQ points just reading this...

why do I do it? WHY?!?!?!?!!!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Meaning Crackhead's string....

Not you, Spaz.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

no its okay

its scientifically proven: i make women dumber.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

first team didn't play that far in

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

no it didn't, not the whole first team anyway, and i cant believe you think

that they have a better chance than us. You seriously think they are better?? thats what is sounds like your saying

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

He said nothing of the sort.

You people are nuts. He said Greene will be effective. Thats it.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

he is saying a lot more than that if that is all he said we wouln't have an issue.

maybe we should ask your fans on your site and mabye your team what they think about grenne to. Im glad you buy into Rex’s talks lol and act as if you already one. (this is how you come across)

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

What? Where did you get that?

Seriously. I have been saying they are better than the Ravens and have a far better chance than the RAVENS. Really, stop being so damn touchy.

Greene WILL get a lot of yardage. It will happen. The Colts are just going to have to get past the Jets D with the passing game and overpower them with offense. And yes, I think the Colts stand a better chance of winning. There, you have my “loyalty oath.” Feel better?

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

John Gill?

Ugh. Bad memories from the Buffalo game.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 6:42 AM EST up reply actions  

No he isn't.

Rice is a better receiver and runner.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

How many playoff games does Rice have

where he’s laid down over 100 yards of rushing?

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Your sample size is ridiculous.

Oakland, Buffalo, Car, Cincy, SD.

SD has a great defense?

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Blah blah blah.

If you wanna lose fair and square then play.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol you were making fun of our defense.

But your offense scored 14 points, on our resting D the first time.

Actually do your homework dude.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

WE will play this sunday

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

That is funny

You accusing others of saying “blah”.

Oh, the irony.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

"About a month ago I got a cactus. A week later, it died. I was really depressed because I was like 'Damn! I am less nurturing than a desert.' (Ladies, that's not true)"

by Colts Homer on Jan 18, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

The SD run D was

11th in the NFL. The Colts are 24th.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

nfl.com ranks

are definitely the best source for knowing how good teams are.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you know a better way to

judge a team’s rushing defense other than what they do on the field?

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

...

are you drunk?

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol no.

They’re atrocious, check the rankings.

by agradecimiento a dios on Jan 18, 2010 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Prior to the final 2 games of the season they were 15th in the league against the run. They gave up close to 400 yards rushing in those two “meaningless” games and it threw their averages way off.

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Rice Vs. Greene

Shon Greene in 2 playoff games this year:
264 total all purpose yards, 2 TDs

Ray Rice in 2 playoff games this year:
288 total all purpose yards 2 TDs

Your point is moot. Here’s an irrelevant question that doesn’t prove anything for you: How many 100 yard games has Shone Green had in the playoffs against the Colts so far?

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

so if the Ravens called and said

Here’s Ray Rice, will trade you Rice for Greene, straight up… your response is no?

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

your response is hell no??

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

....

Are you serious?

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

It depends on your scheme.

For the Jets, Greene is a much better fit.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

This is crazy

How is the Jets scheme different from the Ravens?

It’s really unbelievable you can’t see the two teams are carbon copies of each other.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Answer my question

What is different?

I’ll help you out…nothing.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I have no doubt at all that Greene

will get his yards and at least one if not two scores.

It will be up to Manning to tourch Revis and the Jets’ Secondary to stay ahead.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I want to rec this

80 times.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

So do I.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 6:52 AM EST up reply actions  

pssst: I'm not a Jets fan

Grow up, seriously. Not having respect for your opponent is the ultimate form of homerism. Homer.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

My comments were directed

at some those trying to claim Greene is nothing to be concerned with, is less of a threat than Rice, and I’m a “homer” for being concerned.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I've never said

Greene is nothing to be concerned about. In fact, he concerns me more than any offensive player on the Jets.

However, any objective person, at this moment, would not say Greene is a better RB than Ray Rice. Nobody.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, they would.

But please, why don’t you fly off the handle with more shit out of left field. You are ever so dignified and professional when you do that.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Where did I fly off the handle?

I think you’re overreacting. I’m perfectly fine with homers.

But you need to know when the homer glasses cloud your vision. This is one of those times.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

you flew off the handle

When you said something about how I thought Stanzi would be a draft pick or some such silly thing.

Grow up, seriously.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough

I apologize.

I think you’re being a little over the top with Greene’s ability. Like I said, he might be the best skill position player on the Jets.

But he’s not as good as Rice, right now in their careers. He just isn’t.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

i dont think you have to apologize for anything

by DVOA standards, Ray Rice was the 6th best RB in the league this year

Shonn Greene was 19. Thats still REAL good. But its not 6th.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

those are per carry

so save the PT complant

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

yea, thats why i did

DVOA and not DYAR. And I see you covered the success rate stat (which Addai is better than both in, har har)

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

we are saying he isn't better than Rice,

no one said he wasn’t good and you didn’t have to defend against him.

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

read your first few comments and say that again

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

i have a TON of respect for the jets

read previous threads, I’m the only one on this board nervous about the game sunday. the Jets present various problems for the Colts.

I do not, however, worship at the altar of a rookie that isnt even considered the best back on his team by his team. He’s good. I said I think he’s better than Thomas Jones. I said he scares me more than Thomas Jones. I’m being respectful, you’re being a douchewaffle.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Now into childish namecalling

Nice – and expected.

Saying that Greene is better than Rice isn’t worshiping anything. Greene WILL put down over 100 yards Sunday and at least one score. It’s that simple.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

i didnt name call

you think Greene is better than Rice, Addai, Chris Johnson, Jesus, etc..

I think you’re a douchewaffle.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

You are a giant

Iowa homer.

Next you’ll say Ricky Stanzi should be a top 10 pick.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Where in the hell did that come from

Seriously. I used to have respect for you as a moderator. I just lost it all.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

It's fine to think Greene is a good player

I have no problem with you thinking that. He’s played really well the past 2 games.

But you’re being way over the top, and I’m not the only one to notice.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

A Pro Bowl RB

is not better than a backup RB?

What am I missing?

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

there own team doesn't see it that way

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

When Greene gets the first carry of the game

He’ll be the starter.

Until then, he’s the backup.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

i have no stats to back this up

but I wouldnt be surprised if through conventional stats or dvoa or both if Joseph Addai had a better rookie season than Shonn Greene’s current season.

There isn’t always a linear progression, folks.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

He's boom and bust.

He’s great if you have a good QB.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Ray Rice

Ray Rice 14th in success rate
Shonn Greene 20th

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 5:24 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i cannot believe

i am still reading this thread… its so comical i cant stop!

go mavs, go colts, go rangers, go baylor

by zkmavz on Jan 18, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Same here.

It’s weirdly entertaining.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 6:57 AM EST up reply actions  

umm basically same thing just a diffrent word

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, Rice was a back up last season

He made the Pro Bowl this season.

Greene is a back up this season. I’ve only claimed that right now, Rice is a better RB than Greene.

I fail to see how Rice being a backup last year has anything to do with this.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

i think we're on some internet

form of candid camera…

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Wouldn't surprise me.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 6:58 AM EST up reply actions  

You didn't go to Iowa???

Amiright? Do I win the prize?

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Turn green, dammit!!!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

what does scheme matter?

Skill is the only thing that matters… Its like saying I’d rather have Heath Miller than Dallas Clark because Heath Miller fits the scheme better. You get the best players and adapt the scheme to them, not make the scheme and get players for that scheme.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Greene isn't on my team

Now if they offered Rice for Addai….I think I’d say no. (I can’t believe I’m saying this) because Addai is a better receiver and blocker.

If I were a Jets fan I’d say HELL NO!

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Uhm

Addai is a top 5 blocker in the league.

Ray Rice is a top 5 RB and receiving Back in the League. I would take Rice for Addai faster than you could say " ".

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok - I wouldn't

I started the year as one of Addai’s harshest critics. He’s converted me.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

So would I,

and I love Addai.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 7:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Although I agree...

Jones had a very productive season, unlike LdT.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 4:19 PM EST up reply actions  

not identical

Cover-2 vs Tampa-2 and Indy puts much more emphasis on speed

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Clayborn is excellent

but he doesn’t have Freeney/Mathis speed.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Running down Grigsby from the other side of the field

suggest that it is real close. And I would argue that the Hawkeyes have indeed stressed speed far more than size over the last couple of years along the D-line.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe not yet - but it is certainly getting there

The Ds are close enough with enough similarities that I could see Greene with a bit of an advantage.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:23 PM EST up reply actions  

No you are not the Ravens

You are worse.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Not the Ravens but...

This 2009 Jets team is not as good as the 2006 Ravens team that the Colts held to 6 points. Who was the orchestrator of that incredibly hyped defense? Rex “is a dog’s name” Ryan!

Peyton Manning >> Rex Ryan defenses.

by NaptownMenace on Jan 18, 2010 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Ran well?

Hah!

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 18, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Here we go again...

this reminds me of the Ravens fans after having beaten the Pats.

I try to ignore them.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Jets Fans

Team has 2 good games, one against a good opponent = Team should now be considered the best of all time.

Team has won more than one playoff game in one postseason = Team will win the Super Bowl and shutout every opponent for 3 seasons.

Player has one good run against a team with below average run D = Player will now break all records and be considered the greatest of all time.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 5:42 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

lol

No kidding!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 5:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Let's not get carried away

The Chargers Run D was 11th in the NFL. Not sure that is below average. The Cotls run D, however was in the 20s.

Let’s be honest and admit that the Jet’s running game is what they are going to use to hit us with – and it is a legitimate weapon.

Personally, I think Manning is a far bigger weapon.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

IMO – Manning > all Jets weapons combined.

I’m not saying that the Colts have a dominant run D, but I know from previous experience with the Colts that as people continue to talk more and more sh*t about how terrible they are in years past at stopping the run, things happen and the Colts keep winning.

For the Jets to win, the Colts are going to have to give it to them with several turnovers and a kickoff runback again or something similar. Both teams playing well would not be good for the Jets.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Both teams playing well would not be good for the Jets.

Well said. The Jets running game will be hard to defend – but it couldn’t be any worse than the rushing yards the Colts gave up to Miami and Manning STILL won that game.

I think the Colts can win this – but the Jets’ run game does scare the hell out of me.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh

I think the Colts could stack the box and force Sanchez to throw. He is not comfortable throwing downfield and will make mistakes like he has all year. He holds on to the ball too long and Freeney and Mathis will get him and that means sack/fumbles.

Manning will watch so much film this week his head will nearly explode.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 8:31 PM EST up reply actions  

This is true...

even my husband believes the pundits…he said to me as we’re watching the game: “They look like they can stop the run to me, they’re doing a good job” and I told him: “SEEE, I knew you never listened to me!!” Like I’d never mentioned it.

Geez.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

11th in the NFL...

but giving up 4,5 ypc – which is not 11th best in the league…

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Ehm...

Try to take a look at the 2009-stats, instead of the ones from the 2008-season…

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Here they are...

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?offensiveStatisticCategory=null&archive=false&seasonType=REG&defensiveStatisticCategory=RUSHING&d-447263-o=1&conference=null&d-447263-s=RUSHING_AVERAGE_YARDS&d-447263-n=1&season=2009&qualified=true&Submit=Go&tabSeq=2&role=OPP&d-447263-p=1

Chargers rank 24th (tied with four other teams), meaning that only four teams in the league gave up more yards per carry. Colts gav up 4,3 ypc – 4,1 if you discard the last two games where several starters rested…

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't discard them.

The Colts chose to play the way they played and the stats are the stats as a result.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:13 PM EST up reply actions  

but it's not an accurate representation of the starters play against the run

which is the point of citing the stats.

It’s like tossing out the Vandenburg games when preview Iowa’s Passing O for the Orange Bowl.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Well

Vandenberg’s game against OSU was pretty damn good…

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Against NU, yes.

Minny….from what I saw it was a lot of really conservative playcalling and an O-line that couldn’t pick up a blitz to save Vberg’s life.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

against Minny it was like the safeties were invisible to Vberg

the safety blitz was killing him and he totally missed seeing a safety playing centerfield a couple times.

I was in the endzone facing the same way as the O late in the game. Saw a safety creeping up and cringed before the snap. The safety flew in and shocked Vberg, just like on the previous safety blitzes. It was painful to watch.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.

It's shocking how much can slip your perception

Even your eyes lie

by shake n bake on Jan 18, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

The safeties were invisible to everyone in that game

It was as if the entire offense gave up after the heartwrenching loss to OSU.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Well duh...

But the stast as they are now don’t tell the truth about the Colts defense that will take the field on Sunday.

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Basically, what you're saying is...

if the Colts – God forbid – should suffer an injury to Peyton Manning in the course of this week and start Curtis Painter, we can expect a Colts offense that’ll put up numbers as if Manning was playing…

Or: Tom Brady misses the first three games for the Patriots and for the fourth game you expect him to put up stats based on what Brian Hoyer has put up.

Stats are manipulative, especially if you only take them for the numbers and don’t analyze them… clearly, you don’t analyze them…

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Stats are manipulative

Aided by those who chose to use countless “adjustments” until the stats say what they want them to say.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

But even more so

by those who just take them for face value…

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok

Feel free to “adjust” all you want. I’m sure if you look hard enough you’ll find a stat that says exactly what you want it to say.

Then you can cuddle up at night with your nice warm fuzzy stat and be really really satisfied.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I call it

“Michael Moore” Syndrome. If you look hard enough, you’ll find what you’re looking for.

"Between the wish and the thing the world lies waiting."
— Cormac McCarthy (All the Pretty Horses)

by Addai Another Aday on Jan 18, 2010 6:31 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

rec'd

for ripping on Michael Moore

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Jan 18, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't look to adjust to my way of thinking

I look to adjust to realism…

And realism is NOT what you get when you look at the stats on nfl.com.

I only take out the last two games for the Colts because they meant diddly-squat and the Colts rested several defensive starters (or had them on snap counts), which severely hurts the defensive stats.

I have no way of knowing how the defense would do had they played with all the starters throughout the game – the Jets could have gained 150+ yards, but I don’t know, and I’m not going to speculate in that, so I base “my stats” on the games where the Colts played with the starters. Nothing more, nothing less

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

It's still better

than what you get by looking only on nfl.com…

Let’s agree to disagree.

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess we'll see on Sunday

If the Colts Run D is better at stopping the Jets Run O than the Chargers Run D was.

We can both agree, I’m guessing, that we can hope that it is far more successfull.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

We sure can... :)

But still: At the end of the day, it’s not the yardage that counts – it’s the points on the scoreboard. And whether or not the Colts give up 200 rushing yards, I still believe they will win, because they’ll be able to limit the Jets to FG-attempts on most drives…

On the other hand Manning has traditionally done well against a Rex Ryan-defense, and I hope and expect him to do so again…

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

One thing

to note is that the Chargers fell for the trap of getting too talkative during the game, leading to more personal fouls and unsportsmanlike penalties. The Jets didn’t just dominate the game, the Chargers gave it to them. Big difference.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks, nice catch

However, the Colts are still at 24 and while the Chargers certainly at 11 they are still doing better sitting at 20.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Look at the stats, please...

Colts rank 24th in yards per game, only because they gave up approximately 400 yards over the last two games..

The Colts might give up more yards per game (even if we discard the last two games), but teams also run more against the Colts – and still the Colts only gave up as many TDs as the Chargers…

Yards per carry says SO much more… If you only look at yards per game a team that runs 40 times per game while only throwing 15 will rank dead last as a passing offense, but in reality they could be among the best if you look at yards per attempt, TDs etc.

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

The Colts gave up 134 yards to Steven Jackson...

and the Rams still only scored 6 points.

The Colts are a team that shuts down the other offense in the red zone – it’s what they do. That’s why we beat the Ravens in the regular season.

To beat the Colts you need to score when you get in Colts territory – and you need to score touchdowns, not field goals.

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is why I said the Colts are going to have to

Out-offense the Jets. That was my original point in the first place. At the same time, it is pointless to disrespect the Jets’ running game which is exactly what a lot of the homers here are starting to do.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 18, 2010 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

We should have a lot of respect for the Jets' running game

But that sure as hell doesn’t mean we can’t stop it… it’s not going to be easy, but it can be done.

The Colts need to do what they’ve done all year. Shut down in the red zone: If they do that, the Colts are going to the Super bowl. If not: They will need to out-offense the Jets…

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Iowa hawkeye

You are assuming that the Colts have to play the Jets game….IMO the Jets are going to have to play the Colts game (passing more than they want to) because if they don’t the score will start to get lopsided. That’s just my opinion but if the Jets continue to try to run 50 times I don’t see it working out unless they score TDs on every drive.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Look at the first three quarters of the last game

Only 5 points seperated the score. Assuming that Indy is going to put a big gap on the scoreboard early is wishful thinking right now. This is going to be a close and hard fought game.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jan 19, 2010 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

It depends on what stat you use

YPC, and taking out the 2nd team defense 4 quarters played, the Colts were 13th in the league (4.11), while the Chargers were 24th (4.46).

The Jets are one of, if not the best, running team in the league. It gets neutralized by the Colts “doing what they do”, which I think, and I believe you think, they will do. Namely, with #18.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Jan 18, 2010 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

To Crackback
The Ravens D is not the same as in years past, and actually wasn’t very good. The Jet D is far superior to the Raven D.

3rd ranked defense in the league isn’t very good? Yea, you are so right.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 18, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Jets give up 50 yrds less per game through the air than the Ravens.

Saying they weren’t good was overstating. But they are clearly not anywhere near as good as the Jets.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

BBS admitting he was wrong

Glory me, what a sight…

Actually, what I like about this site is when writers are wrong, they cop to it unabashedly. Props.

by slash196 on Jan 18, 2010 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

Historical Look

2008 – Colts, lose Wild Card
2007 – Patriots, lose Super Bowl
2006 – Chargers, lose Divisional
2005 – Redskins, lose Divisional
2004 – Steelers, lose Title Game

These were the “hottest” teams entering each postseason. Momentum matters as much as the team with the coolest-looking uniform in determining the outcome of games.

That round had an old-time feel. Three home teams won simply because they were better. There was a crazy game, like usual, but the home teams brought the wood. Glad to see home field matters (at least in domes).

EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Jan 18, 2010 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah

but in those days, the 1-2 would meet in the title game all the time. The home-team record in Title games is far worse than the home-team record in the divisional round.

EVH+DLR=BFFr........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on Jan 18, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey San Diego!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoKAcVL_phI

"About a month ago I got a cactus. A week later, it died. I was really depressed because I was like 'Damn! I am less nurturing than a desert.' (Ladies, that's not true)"

by Colts Homer on Jan 18, 2010 1:29 PM EST reply actions  

Heh.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: The first known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used by Egyptians in 2000 B.C.

by Cassieper on Jan 19, 2010 7:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I repeat...

Momentum is overrated and rest is the new black

by pmj on Jan 18, 2010 1:57 PM EST reply actions  

Momentum is just another intangible

Lots of things in football can’t be measured but we believe that they exist. We give them names like “swagger”, “confidence”, “mental toughness”, and, yes, “momentum”. All are interesting to talk about in theory but often not very useful in practice. If you can’t measure it, can’t even really define it, how can you know what effect it has on a game?

“Momentum” isn’t dead any more than the Easter Bunny is dead. Hopefully what is dead is the idea that momentum can be quantified (silly) or that it can be deliberately invoked by winning your last X games (even sillier).

"The best defensive player is the sideline." - Trevor Pryce, on how to stop Peyton Manning

by szquirrel on Jan 18, 2010 2:10 PM EST reply actions  

i dont believe momentum exists.

Confidence certainly does. A lack of confidence will make you play like shit, too much confidence will have you making too many exploitable decisions, but the right amount of confidence is juuuuust right.

Momentum, on the other hand, is nothing. Swagger is probably just a word of confidence bordering on arrogance. But momentum… can you define it for me? Can you tell me how it affects the outcome of individual situations?

Where was the Jets momentum for the first 3 quarters yesterday? Was it their momentum that made Nate Kaeding miss 3 field goals?

Not only do I not think momentum doesn’t matter in the playoffs, I would argue (successfully, imo) that it doesn’t even exist.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, yeah

Did you read my comment? That was my whole point, really.

You could probably define momentum as “the confidence that comes from a recent string of good performances”. It’s just another mental state that helps you stay loose and not get so stressed that you make mistakes.

It’s like pornography. Nobody can define it but everybody thinks they know it when they see it.

"The best defensive player is the sideline." - Trevor Pryce, on how to stop Peyton Manning

by szquirrel on Jan 18, 2010 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Your last paragraph

Is why the Colts will win this game. Dallas Clark and Joe Addai coming out of the backfield and sitting about 8 yards past the line of scrimmage in the middle of the field can’t be stopped when the rest of the defense is blitzing and Wayne and Garcon are taking the CBs and Safeties down the field on dummy routes.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Our guys will NOT take this game lightly.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Jan 18, 2010 6:12 PM EST up reply actions  

A, fuckin' Men.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Jan 18, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions  

It's green

Hooray.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 19, 2010 7:36 AM EST up reply actions  

What I Always Tell BCS Apologists

is playoffs are essential in sports because they determine the best teams. The Cardinals obviously got to where they were last year because they were better than all other NFC teams even if their record didn’t indicate it. The Colts and Jets have proven to be the AFC’s two best teams and I think Indianapolis will win but it’ll be tough. Colts vs. Saints would be completely epic!

Brad James

by the new Bradfather on Jan 18, 2010 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

Funniest Video on Youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxnsprz0roc

"About a month ago I got a cactus. A week later, it died. I was really depressed because I was like 'Damn! I am less nurturing than a desert.' (Ladies, that's not true)"

by Colts Homer on Jan 18, 2010 2:46 PM EST reply actions  

Hahah

Dude, this guy is great. I watch his videos every once in a while. He is such an idiot. So funny.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 18, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

This article is way too simplistic...

There are too many things that are not taken into account that are just as important…just to say that momentum is the end all be all is short sighted there are many factors which come into play…

Going into this weekend I predicted that the Chargers, and Cowboys would have trouble…maybe not loose, but have serious trouble.

Why??

First the Cowboys…as a team…from owner down to lowly ball boy they were all very excited that they got the monkey off their back with the win the previous week. The Cowboys were very hot…as hot as a team can be…but they all acted like they had won what they needed to and forgot that the playoffs still continued. This showed up the this week when they came out flat and got stuffed!! It had nothing to do with or without momentum…it had everything to do with their mental state going into the game…yea a playoff win…then done!!

Next we have the Chargers. This seems to be a team that thinks they have a devine right to win it all. From LT to Rivers to their coach…they believed all they had to do was show up. Once again, they had momentum…but they did not step it up a notch going intot he playoffs and lost. Listening to LT at the post game conference completely shows this…“this wasn’t how it was supposed to end”…bull crap. They were mental light weights and believed all the hype…period. Nothing at all to do with momentum..although momentum is the high visibility thing to write about now.

Baltimore…I don’t know where the momentum argument came from for this team. I never remember hearing about it…they lost to a better team..the Colts.

The Colts…professional all around…but they did things quite a bit different this season, while resting players. Could this have something to do with it? I think so.

So, while momentum is not something that decides the game outcome…it can and does come into play…but there are other factors which seem to be able to override the whole “MO” argument.

"If me and King Kong went into an alley, only one of us would come out. And it wouldn't be the monkey."
"I don't really trust a sane person."
"I never met a man I didn't want to fight." The one and only Lyle Alzado

by TRDean on Jan 18, 2010 3:47 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

How interesting to come back

and see Jets fans are already claiming victory in Sunday’s game.

by NYKings on Jan 18, 2010 4:20 PM EST reply actions  

yea just this one

GO COLTS!!! 09 IS OURS!!!
previously known as (ANGELSFAITH)

by TheAngelsColts on Jan 18, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't. Feed. The. Fucking. Troll.

Flag his posts and fucking move on. Goddamn it. He’s a fucking attention whore any your giving him a handjob in front of the president.

by vintagephoenix on Jan 18, 2010 5:17 PM EST reply actions  

Grow UP-VintageP

TO: VINTAGE PHOENIX….Gee wiz, you sure add a lot to the forum. Only morons have to resort to using filthy language to get attention. My grandson and I like to read these post together and the comments. I’m embarrassed to have him think that Colts fans are represented by people like you, Are you so scared to try and write something useful that you have to resort to filth to get your point across? I pity you, man..or are you a “little boy out behind the barn” trying out those words to see if they make you sound tough and hard nosed. By the way, my 11 year old grandson probably can dissect the game better than you, and never use bathroom language to do it!

Let the circle be Unbroken!

[url=http://carinsurance-journal.com/] Car Insurance Journal[/url]

by emumber1 on Jan 18, 2010 6:21 PM EST reply actions  

you just did your 11yo grandson proud

don’t teach him filfth, but make sure you pass on that pointless hate and anger

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The language is to accent my deep disappointment that this thread has be destroyed by the same baseless shortsided "righteous" anger that you have just shown.

I add tons to this board where ever I can. What have you done? I don’t recognize your name at all. Of all the stupidity that this nation seems hellbent on following blindly, the lowest is censorship. THe free expression of ideas is far more important than cowtowing to fringe special interests like yours. If you don’t like how I express frustration, fine, dig your head in the sand and pretend life was better when people didn’t live passed 50 and it was ok to hate other people and races because you never had to defend your bias, and the loudest/richest idiot in the town got to make law. I choose to live in this century, when if I say something someone doesn’t like, I can face my accuser without having stones thrown at me.
I use the language to express my ideas as well as I can without facial and vocal inflection. That requires that I use ALL my words. Take your idiotic, outdate “big difference between Saturday night and Sunday morning” morality and shove it. Notice the lack of “curses” in this post.

by vintagephoenix on Jan 18, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

do you fellate

farm animals with that mouth?!?!

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 7:54 PM EST up reply actions  

37?!

"Between the wish and the thing the world lies waiting."
— Cormac McCarthy (All the Pretty Horses)

by Addai Another Aday on Jan 18, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I have a signed copy of Jay and Silent Bob

so I understand completely.

"Between the wish and the thing the world lies waiting."
— Cormac McCarthy (All the Pretty Horses)

by Addai Another Aday on Jan 18, 2010 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I met him at IU when he was doing his first speaking tour (for DVD). My girlfriend (now just friend) was instumental in bringing him here.

She got to hang out with his crew all day and even got to do some camera work…and then she got left off the credits.

by vintagephoenix on Jan 18, 2010 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, cool.

I have that DVD. Chasing Amy is the best, IMO.

"Between the wish and the thing the world lies waiting."
— Cormac McCarthy (All the Pretty Horses)

by Addai Another Aday on Jan 18, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

im sorry

im so fucking insensitive. my joke wasnt funny. i more embarassed than a rabbit covered in shit. i won’t let it happen again. im sorry.

Never doubt Peyton Manning, he’ll make you look silly
Joseph Addai is a good running back.
Im a douchebag, an asshole, and I'm rarely right.

(Atleast) one-time SBNation Comment of the Day Comment Maker Person!
Hello, Ladies!

by SpazMo on Jan 18, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice first comment

I like how you “contribute” and detract attention from yourself and focus on football discussion.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Jan 19, 2010 7:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Teams go as their QB goes

Difference between Romo and Favre, one QB got rid of the ball when faced with similar kind of pressure and the other didn’t. Same difference between Manning and Rivers too.

A thing that has to be noticed that the Chargers offense was invested in hype, energy and play calling too much into what I call the jump ball offense. Routes sometimes take 4 seconds to develop, a luxury you are not going to have with a blitzing Jets or Ravens team. Take note of the fact that the Chargers lost at home earlier to the Ravens (whose D was coached by Rex Ryan till last year) and now to the Jets (also coached by Rex Ryan on D). Their offense just does not match up well with Rex Ryan Ds. It does not matter how tall your WRs are if your route does not have the time to develop. That is why it was surprising, for all the offensive genius reputation that Norv had, he did not adjust and call more slants to his wideouts and more checkdowns to Sproles & Gates.

Now, take a look at the Colts offense, a QB that gets rid of the ball most of the time within 3 seconds and routes that are more predicated on route running and being in a spot and Manning releases the ball in anticipation accurately most of the time. That is why Manning’s offenses match up better against Rex Ryan Ds than the Chargers. Manning’s record against Rex Ryan’s D speaks for itself.

by chad72 on Jan 18, 2010 7:19 PM EST reply actions  

Very true

This is exactly what I was saying before that Chargers – Jets game. Chargers throw it deep way too much. That is also why I thought a healthy Colts defense would also match up well with the Chargers because Freeney and Mathis are likely to get to Rivers before his 50 yard routes would materialize.

Manning will probably start slow against the Jets if the Jets start out real aggressive. It seemed like the Jets were more conservative, especially on 1st and 2nd downs against the Chargers and I think Manning would put up good numbers early if they take the same approach. Jets got more aggressive as the game went on since the Chargers were making so many mistakes and the score was still close. If the score isn’t close, that aggressiveness will backfire IMO.

Another thing to note is that Manning, although sometimes slow out of the gate against aggressive 3-4 blitzing schemes, will figure out the other team. It’s inevitable. And once he does, the train will start rolling. And when the train starts rolling, you can’t stop it.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Jan 18, 2010 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

But keep in mind that the Jets play a lot of press man coverage. Which is why it looked like Manning was missing throws the first time we played. His receiver’s routes were disrupted and timing was off. No doubt Manning will adjust, but Rex will too. But we know theres no answer for Manning when he’s hot and gets our blitzes locked up. If he can do that, we get blown out. If we can keep him confused and touch him up, we have a great chance to win. Part of keeping him confused is keeping the ball away by running effectively and limiting his looks at our defense. Can’t wait for this game.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 7:31 PM EST reply actions  

Also, make sure your left tackle remembers to block Dwight Freeney...

He’s the guy with number 93 on his chest. The same guy who the Jets apparently forgot to block twice. That had to be the easiest 2 sacks in his life.

by Gwen on Jan 18, 2010 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Might be a little harder this time too.

This other guy, Robert Mathis? he’s pretty good. He was out when we played the Jets last time. So don’t forget to block him either.

by WaynesWorld on Jan 19, 2010 10:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Make sure your guys play a whole game this time.

So when we beat you fair and square we don’t have to hear any crying. Other than from Colt fans of course.

by Crackback on Jan 18, 2010 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Troll

You’d be much more likely to win if the Colts didn’t, so quit being masochistic and asking the Colts to whip you.

Nope. Not really.

by Bri Bri on Jan 19, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Great Honesty by Brock

Raheem Brock, Indianapolis Colts
I hate Brady! I hate Tom Brady! But I really do respect him. I respect his game, he’s a tough QB. He’s just like Peyton, but no, I don’t like him! I don’t like the Patriots, none of us here like the Patriots. But you gotta give respect.

by minigenius1246 on Jan 19, 2010 3:47 AM EST reply actions  

Uh...tell that to the 2007 Giants

Momentum can do a lot in some circumstances, like help you win a Super Bowl. Having a great defense (at the time) and a few no-calls by the refs, and a couple miracle pass completions off the helmet, and there you go, momentum swings things in your favor.

by Ozstryker on Jan 19, 2010 2:30 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Stats Prove It: Brady Is Now a Choker

Recent FanPosts

Small
Coaching staff finalized today...
Small
How to build a championship team
Small
Two more colts assistants
Small
Co-existence
Img_0497-comp_small
Colts Mock Draft
Small
Tony Ugoh
Small
Jim Irsay on Peyton Manning Last Week
Small
next years' starting lineup
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury
Small
Colts Mock 1.0

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Photo_small nopuntintended

Colts_small emiller17

Sbmanning_small Stew Blake