Is Too Much "Rest' To Blame For the Colts Terrible Injury Situation
One of the signature tenets of the Colts as an organization is the degree in which they set aside time for 'rest' for their players during the off-season. Their off-season conditioning program is not known as a 'grind.' In fact, players can skip the program all together, even the sessions that are mandatory, and still show up Week One as a starter without any repercussions whatsoever.
Just ask Reggie Wayne and Robert Mathis.
Yet, despite this program that promotes resting a player's body for the long haul, the Colts have easily been one of the most injured teams since 2006. Sure, lots of team battle injuries, but it seems every year the Colts have to contend with some series of devastating injuries. The injury situation has made the team so paranoid that they quit on an undefeated season last year due in large part to fear that certain key players would get hurt in 'meaningless games.'
The irony is Dwight Freeney was injured during a fairly routine play in the AFC Championship Game last season, and that injury (more than anything else) affected the overall outcome of Super Bowl 44.
Recently, FOX Sports' Alex Marvez discussed the current string of injuries seemingly crippling the NFL. Some of his findings are very eye-opening:
Goodell has preached player safety during his push for an 18-game regular-season schedule beginning in 2012. The NFL commissioner hopes a reduction in offseason workouts and preseason games can help prevent and/or offset some of the injuries inherent in expansion.
But as it stands now, a 16-game docket seems rough enough. Dating back to the offseason, NFL teams have already placed 34 more players on injured reserve through 10 weeks (311) than at this point last year (277). The final numbers will assuredly be the highest since the NFL began playing with 32 teams in 2002.
After the jump, check out what Marvez has to say about the Colts this year. To put it mildly, the injury docket for Indy is damn near depressing, and a potential reason the Colts have more players on IR than any other team in the league is how they handle their off-season conditioning.
For starters, Marvez breaks down the league's teams into four categories: Fit As A Fiddle, Stable Condition, Intensive Care, and Life Support. A team like the Kansas City Chiefs, who are still fighting to stay relevant in the AFC West, is listed as Fit As A Fiddle. The reason:
Head coach Todd Haley’s heavy offseason conditioning push is paying dividends. The Chiefs head into the second half of the season with only five players on injured reserve.
Haley's off-season program was discussed regularly prior to the season, and though his Chiefs are 4-5, the reasons for this record are not injuries.
Now, contrast this with the Indianapolis Colts, who Marvez describes as On Life Support.
A relatively anonymous roster outside of QB Peyton Manning has become even more unrecognizable with an NFL-high 20 players sent to the IR list since the preseason. That doesn’t include Bob Sanders, who may not play again this year after tearing his biceps in the season-opener. It would be understandable if Manning didn’t even know the names of the players he was throwing to lately. The Colts (6-3) have managed to take the AFC South lead, but it’s hard to imagine a second straight Super Bowl appearance with so many players sidelined.
Marvez is correct. The Colts are not a Super Bowl team as currently constructed. Not with these many injuries, and not without Bob Sanders. Indy ain't winning a ring in 2010 with Aaron Francisco as a starting safety.
The key stat in Marvez's Colts section is the 20 players on Indy's IR.
20.
That's over 1/3 of a 53-man roster.
Now, some could say that the Colts being 6-3 and the Chiefs being 4-5 is proof that the Colts off-season conditioning program works better. For me, I'd argue that the Colts having a better record has more to do with Peyton Manning being Indy's QB and Matt Cassell being KC's QB. If you took Peyton Manning and put him on KC's roster, they'd be undefeated right now. Peyton Manning on a depleted and decimated Colts roster is 6-3. Put Cassell on this Indy roster. Do they even win one game?
The injury situation is so bad that we have Colts president Bill Polian going on a radio show like 1070's Dan Dakich Show back on November 4th to seemingly discuss just how injuries have crippled this Colts team. Here's what Polian discussed on the show:
We're really two teams. When we're healthy, assuming at some point that we will get healthy, I think that's a reasonable assumption, I think we're a pretty good team. Right now, we really don't know what we are because we don't know who is going to play from day to day. It's a tribute to our coaching staff that they've gotten this team to play as well as it has for as long as it has. But, if this epidemic of injuries, and that's exactly what it is. It's an epidemic. [If it] continues we can only stretch the rubber band so far. We're on the brink of succumbing to this injury epidemic.
Polian said this three days before medical staff cleaned Austin Collie off the turf at Lincoln Financial Field during a 26-24 loss to the Eagles. Blair White was also injured in that game. So, if this team was 'on the brink' prior to Collie getting knocking into thinking his name is 'Batman,' where is this team now?
In the interview with Dakich, Polian also said that if the team get get as close to being healthy by the Week Twelve match-up with the Chargers, the Colts should be in good shape and would 'have a chance.' So, there is our barometer. If this team is healthy by Nov. 28th, we're OK.
If not, we're screwed. All according to the president of the team.
So, what has caused this 'epidemic' of injuries? Never did I think I'd see anything worse than the injury list the Colts had to contend with in 2007. 2010 has eclipsed it, and then some. Even last year, injuries to Bob Sanders, Anthony Gonzalez, Tyjuan Hagler, and Marlin Jackson limited what this team could do. That's five starters who were not part of the team's playoff roster. This year, entering our annual November meeting with the Patriots, it is possible that eight starters from the opening day roster will not play.
The situation is so bad, some of emailed me asking if Bill Polian is already conceding the game with the Patriots. Read this quote from Polian and tell me how you take it (from this past Monday's The Bill Polian Show broadcast on 1070 and HANK FM):
There is a long way to go in this season. The winner of this game is not guaranteed to go to the Super Bowl, and the loser is not guaranteed to miss the playoffs. It's one game and it's interesting and exciting, but it's only one game with seven to go.
So, we return to the same question: Why are devastating injuries to key players a norm for the Colts year after year? Why does it seem this team is more injured than everyone else?
One NFL employee told me privately that the fault might be with their conditioning program and their training staff. Marvez seems to suggest this in his article. Both Bob Sanders and Anthony Gonzalez participated thoroughly in the program. Both were, essentially, knocked out for the season in Week One. Meanwhile, Robert Mathis and Reggie Wayne skipped all the off-season activities, and they have yet to miss a game.
Makes you think.
For me, I really can't put my finger on what exactly the problem is, but I do know that there is a problem. In 2007, this team lost starters Anthony McFarland, Dwight Freeney, and Marvin Harrison for either the entire season or for significant chunks of the season. In 2008, Bob Sanders, Kelvin Hayden, Marlin Jackson, Joseph Addai, and Tony Ugoh are just some of many player either knocked out for the season or for several games. Last year, Sanders, Gonzalez, Hagler, and Jackson were all done for the year by November. Prior to the Eagles game, Polian claimed 11 starters would be out.
Is it conditioning? Is it the medical staff? Is Bill Polian simply drafting too many players with a history of injury, like Gonzo, Sanders, and the newly drafted Kevin Thomas?
I personally don't know, but it is something. A team like the Lions (2-7) have 15 people on IR. They might have 16 if Matthew Stafford's shoulder injury ends his 2010 season. The fact that Indy has managed to go 6-3 with 20 players on IR is indeed a tribute to the coaching staff and to Peyton Manning.
But, at some point, someone has to start asking WHY all of these players are spending more time rehabbing and less time helping the team win football games.
Going back to Marvez's article, of the teams listed as Fit As A Fiddle, five of the nine teams listed currently lead their divisions. The other four include the Bills and 49ers, both coached by incompetent idiots. The Cardinals are also tossed in there, but their record is more a result of Kurt Warner retiring than anything else.
Bottom line: The healthy teams win more often than not. Right now, our team isn't healthy and at some point we need to start asking why that is. I'm not one of these people who thinks it is simple 'bad luck' that 20 players land on IR. But, that's just me.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hello, good citizen. My name is Batman.
I think Cassel could’ve won the Bengal game.
Or maybe the Chiefs game, if he got to play himself…
Cookie Cookie Cookie starts with C!
by willyduer on Nov 18, 2010 12:25 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
1-8 with Cassel Sounds Right
That’s true – he may have gotten one in a Cassel v. Cassel death match.
But Palmer and the Bengals probably do not crap their pants if Cassel is the opposing QB.
by Cole Farrington on Nov 18, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions
It's not just the Colts that are paranoid
I’m watching every game now half crouched over with one eye shut waiting for the next shoe to drop.
Seriously, I don’t think my heart can take much more. When Collie was laying there, looking for all the world like he was paralyzed, I felt like I was going to throw up.
If Peyton goes down, I AM throwing up, turning off the TV, and taking up knitting.
by Selador on Nov 18, 2010 12:46 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
I think this is a poor arguement.
I am not necessarily in agreement with the Colts on there rest requirements, but rest has nothing to do with a lot of these injuries.
“Colts Rest” or a “Todd Hailey Grinding Off-season” make no difference for these injuries.
I doubt more conditioning word in the off-season would have prevented Collie getting hit in the back of the head.
Conditioning wouldn’t have saved Session from having his elbow be blown up.
Conditioning wouldn’t have saved Sander’s elbow.
Conditioning wouldn’t have protected the ankle of Mike Hart or Freeney last year during the AFC Championship game.
Some players are more injury prone than others. That is an all-together separate argument, but these players would not be less injured with a different off-season program.
It seems to me some people have yet to get over Week 16 and 17 from last year and have found anther way to rant against it. They feel that if they were put in charge instead of Bill Polian or Jim Caldwell that their choices would be better choices and that the Colts and the city of Indianapolis would be better of because of them.
6-2, 185
It's not rest, it's the price we pay for our philosophy
When you try to field the fastest team in the league and still focus on physicality, there’s going to be more injuries. That’s just physics. Bad luck has made this year worse than others, but this is an issue we’ve had for years. Can’t have it both ways, unfortunately.
i'm going to nitpick a little
i’m not sure where Marvez got the figure of 20 players sent to IR — by my count it’s only 16.
Also, look up “tenant” vs “tenet” (former is a renter, latter is a principle).
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
IR
I believe some members that were on IR (four I think) were given injury settlements.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.
these are the ones i'm aware of
Here’s my list
Prior to the season I have the following 9:
Swenson, Santi, Silva, McCleskey, D.Caldwell, McCauley, Kevin Thomas, John Gill, Jordan Hemby,
Since the season began, I have these 7
Ugoh, Humber, Devin Moore, Bullitt, Brandon King, Dallas Clark, and Gonzo
Now, I’ve counted John Gill, and I’ve counted the 4 known players that got settlements (McCleskey, McCauley, Ugoh, and Humber). There was some controversy over whether Taj Smith was injured-waived or just plain cut, but adding him would only bring the list up to 17.
Still not quite 20 unless i’m missing someone.
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
Ok, I'm officially pronouncing Marvez full-of-shit with that figure of 20.
It’s been 2 days, and no one has shown me where my figure of 17 max is wrong.
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
by zherebyonki on Nov 20, 2010 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
also, it's misleading to compare the figure of "20" to the 53-man roster, and say it's over a third
I’d state the proper proportion as 10 out of 53, counting only those 7 that did make the roster (even Ugoh, briefly) as well as Santi, Silva, Kevin Thomas. Some may say another DB could’ve made the team too, but how many could they carry realistically, including
Bullitt and Brandon King in that list. So then 10/53 is a truer proportion of the “forced-turnover” rate. Greater than 20%, which is sickening, don’t get me wrong! It’s kinda scarier if you put it in terms of the rate of IR-ing per week since the beginning of the season. It’s 7/9, nearly one a week, which would be mount up to 20 or so depending on how far they were to go in the postseason.
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
i meant nearly 20%, not greater. Duh.
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
Perhaps I missed something
Wayne and Mathis skipped the off-season conditioning and haven’t been injured. Are you saying they did there own off-season program which better prepared them than the team’s program?
"There was some talk: do they take me or Ryan Leaf and I said: 'Look, here's the deal. If you don't take me, I'm gonna kick your butt for the next fifteen years'."- #18
"there" should be "their"
"There was some talk: do they take me or Ryan Leaf and I said: 'Look, here's the deal. If you don't take me, I'm gonna kick your butt for the next fifteen years'."- #18
Great googly moogly
The Chefs are actually 5-4 (not that it affects your point)
Off-season conditioning may be part of the problem.
One of the least injured players in the game was one Walter Payton. He missed one game his rookie year (forced to sit out even though he felt he could play).
His off-season conditioning program was a killer, and he felt he started the season in better shape than at the end.
What was outstanding is that in his 3838 rushes over 13 seasons, the defense was always pretty sure he’d get the ball. Until McMahon, there was really no threat of the pass. He didn’t die easily, and sustained tons of hits.
I think guys are more likely to get injured if they build up and back off, than if they maintain. You can lose tone so gradually, you don’t realize you’re out of shape until it’s too late.
The thing with Payton, is his conditioning program wasn’t the Bears program. He did his own thing, and theirs was much less grueling.
My life has been a trivial pursuit. Trivia: where three roads meet.
The more you know, the more you know that you don't know.
by SlotMachinePlayer on Nov 18, 2010 6:01 PM EST reply actions
part of this is us
we win, we draft lower. and settle for smaller or otherwise deficient (in some way) players. and, we settle for fast players over bulky one. there just are not at lof 5 foot 8 players in the league for a reason, bob sanders-like talent or not. some of that is physics.having said that, i too think it is partly our conditioning staff (NOT training staff so much). one thing that i dont see measured is turf effect. i know they claim our turf is just like grass. but is it?
Unconvinced
For me, I really can’t put my finger on what exactly the problem is,
but I’ll offer conjecture anyway. Supporting evidence would help. Telling me two guys who participated in the program are out and two who didn’t are in, doesn’t cut it. If you want to point the finger of blame at the offseason program (which seems to be the point here), then let’s see if there’s a relationship between participation in offseason programs and the number of a team’s players on IR or some other metric of “injured”. Now your sample jumps from 4 to 32…that’s meaningful. Analyze with a regression in Excel and you may even have a significant result…maybe.
"Keep your government hands off my Medicare!!!" ~ 2009 quote of the year, Yale Book of Quotations
"Mandrake, have you ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water?"
by Via_Chicago on Nov 18, 2010 9:10 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Oh, and I think you forgot a question mark in your title,
or was that on purpose? ; )
"Keep your government hands off my Medicare!!!" ~ 2009 quote of the year, Yale Book of Quotations
"Mandrake, have you ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water?"

by 































