Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

So, I take it having Valentine's Day on a Sunday with no football was not popular

Wow.

Over 1700 comments in one thread about how Valentine's Day sucks? My goodness, you people are a chatty bunch.

For something to chat about this morning, why don't we start with Reggie Wayne and his effort (or supposed lack thereof) during the Super Bowl. ESPN's Paul Kuharsky had some strong words regarding Wayne after re-watching the Super Bowl:

Reggie Wayne’s effort on two big passes seemed questionable. He and Manning can praise Tracy Porter endlessly, but Wayne seemed to give up on the route. He allowed Porter to gain position on a pattern analysts say he’s got to be sure continues and crosses the corner who’s in coverage. The move he made before he made his break didn’t look like much and the cut wasn’t very sharp.

The last time I criticized Reggie Wayne's effort was in the 2007 regular season game against the Chargers; the one where Dwight Freeney broke his foot. Wayne seemed to give up on a route in that game allowing Antonio Cromartie to pick off one of six Manning INTs in that game.

Was Reggie's effort "questionable" in the Super Bowl? I have no re-watched the game yet.

0 recs  |  Comment 150 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

He did

Wayne did look listless on that play. I haven’t had the stomach to re-watch the entire game, but I have watched that clip 3-4 times. Reggie runs the first part of the route just fine (of course it’s a straight line, but still). It’s the 2nd part of the route where he starts his stutter step that looks shaky.

He might have slipped or just not planted well, but he definitely didn’t continue the route like he should have. His knee could be hurt or maybe he just gave up. Even if he had continued the route, I’m not sure that Porter still wouldn’t have jumped it.

by redmid17 on Feb 15, 2010 9:29 AM EST reply actions  

Hate to say it ...

but I agree w/PK. I had been watching #87 earlier in the game after telling my wife “wait for it, Wayne’s going to bust out a big one here”, and I saw him sandbag some plays where he knew (apparently) that the ball wasn’t coming his way.

He barely jogged off the line at the snap and made little effort to even gain his defender’s attention. Now I noticed that a couple times and told myself he was trying to goad his defender into relaxing on one and he’d burn right past him … but in hindsight, I’m not sure what was going on.

Reggie’s been so solid, so consistent, such a quality WR … I want to blame this on the knee somehow.

by m@chu on Feb 15, 2010 9:31 AM EST reply actions  

He seems to have somewhat of an ego..

Nothing like T.O. but I feel like he doesn’t like it when the ball isn’t coming his way. He kinda disappeared from the field after the AFC championship game when Garcon had his huge game.

by HappyLittleTreez on Feb 15, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

He has an ego, sure

But the game wasn’t Wayne vs the Saints. You have to be ready to catch the ball anytime, doesn’t matter if you’re Wayne, or Baskett or Robinson, you have to make the play whenever you’re asked to.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

My point exactly.

When he’s not happy and/or frustrated (for example when he’s not being thrown too) he doesn’t play to his potential. He didn’t even try and chase Porter down.

by HappyLittleTreez on Feb 15, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

That's true for almost all good WR

I’ve heard stories like that about Marvin Harrison. The pick 6 in the AFC championship game is a perfect example of that.

by Sanders_fan89 on Feb 15, 2010 1:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

oh come on

leave that to some idiots named T.O., Williams or Moss. You can’t be on this team with that kind of attitude. You can’t play this sport like that. You have as your QB a guy who tries to please them all but if the game develops so that you have a big or small role, then the QB or the coaches have to do what’s best for the team, not for a particular guy.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know who you are trying to argue with here?

I’m in agreement with you and I stated that in my post.

by HappyLittleTreez on Feb 15, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

actually to no one.

Sorry if that “oh come on” confused you, but I had no other way of putting it. I know you agree with me. Sorry about that.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, that did confuse me..

you’re cool. I hate even mentioning TO and Moss in the same sentence as Reggie. I just hope he doesn’t go down that road. He’s better than that.

By the way, what’s that in your profile picture?

by HappyLittleTreez on Feb 15, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, that's me

in front of the Teotihuacan pyramids here in Mexico. It’s said that pyramids charge you with positive energy, so, I went there with some of my Colts gear for them to have a nice season and well, it got us to the SB lol.
From now on, it’s one of the family traditions but this year we’re planning to go there twice: one in March-May and one the week before the playoffs.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 16, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

That's cool..

kinda what I thought but couldn’t make out the pyramid.

Yeah, you definitely need to take a Wayne jersey next time you go lol. They already have the Colts favored to win the SB next year. Go Colts!

by HappyLittleTreez on Feb 16, 2010 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, I only have

Sanders, Manning (2) and Harrison. Don’t mind, I’m planning to get a Clark/Freeney/Wayne/Garcon or Bullitt jersey. Me and my brother are planning to get at least, two more jerseys.
But yeah, I will return this year. LOL
GO COLTS!

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 16, 2010 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree too

He looked tired, pressured. I don’t know, but that pick, aside from being an (ugh) awesome play by Porter, was totally on Wayne. He didn’t even chase Porter after it. The last game of the play was awful. Two key passes and two mistakes from him.
Too bad, I love Reggie but this has to be one of the worst games I remember from #87

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

LOL, I meant "last play of the game-9" obviously

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

I refuse to re-watch the game

so I will never know.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Feb 15, 2010 9:36 AM EST reply actions  

And it might be better that way.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 9:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm with you

"Fans are the only ones who really care. There are no free-agent fans." - Dick Young

by NYKings on Feb 15, 2010 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I really don't want to know

It’s enough for me to know that something went wrong on the play.

Just thinking about the interception is enough pain. I have no desire to watch it again.

Maybe in 5-10 years. Or when we’ve won 5 SBs in a row. Then it will be like watching the 1st half of teh ’06 AFCCG.

Hopefully.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Feb 15, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Watching the first part of 06 AFCCG is fun because I can think of meltdown coming.

It’s going to be a long, long time if I ever watch that SB again

"Fans are the only ones who really care. There are no free-agent fans." - Dick Young

by NYKings on Feb 15, 2010 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Believe it or not

I think that, when Manning retires, he will destroy all records. Including most rings ever won by a QB…

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

even I don't believe he'll destroy that one

he’ll have an incredible sunset to his career if he even matches it

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 15, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

It may have been too much

But I believe he CAN. If he matches them or even reaches 3 it would still be awesome of course.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Well since Bradshaw won 4...

Peyton would have to win 3 out of the next 6 SB’s to even match him, assuming that he will retire at 40.

You Colts fans sure do have an unhealthy love of Peyton. Which team will you guys go back to rooting for once he retires?

by Brothersko on Feb 15, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

um... the Colts

given that – as you point out – we’re Colts fans

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 15, 2010 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Jokes

They’re tough to get sometimes.

by Brothersko on Feb 15, 2010 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

um yeah

I haven’t noticed you joking all that much around here

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 15, 2010 6:59 PM EST up reply actions  

so you're saying it is impossible?

Wow, which team do you root for? the Raiders and JaMarcus Russell?

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Not impossible, verrrry improbable

Peyton’s record in the playoffs is 9-9 right now. To win 3 more his record would probably have to be at least 9-3. Of course, this is assuming he won’t retire before 40 and will make the playoffs the next 6 years in a row.

Both of those, imo, aren’t big assumptions since Peyton isn’t slowing down much and will probably last until 40. And he will probably make the playoffs every year, too. I think he has proven that he is the best regular-season QB ever.

But since it took him 12 years to win 9 playoff games, and he has to win at the very least 9 more for 3 SB’s, I highly doubt he can do it, given his penchant for losing every year in the playoffs.

by Brothersko on Feb 15, 2010 7:07 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

"Penchant for losing every year in the playoffs."

You make it sound like everyone else is winning each year in the playoffs. Or that it’s Peyton’s ultimate decision or within his power to win every playoff round all by his lonesome.

I appreciate your other comments but that one is just typical Manning bashing/laziness in closing up your argument.

by Riddering on Feb 16, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Yea

that was kind of unnecessary Manning-bashing. I guess I should have worded it differently.

“It took Manning 12 years to win 9 playoff games, and since he’d have to win at least 9 more for 3 SB’s, I highly doubt he can do it considering the Colts’ less-than-stellar playoff record the last 12 years.”

by Brothersko on Feb 16, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

ditto

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 15, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Re the open thread:

Yep. We tend to be very chatty, and that probably won’t change for the offseason.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 10:00 AM EST reply actions  

I wonder about the knee

Did, not being able to do his usual things bring him to that point?. He didn’t look that sharp on a lot of cuts in the game. Looked especially slow on the pick 6 play and coming back on the underthrown deep ball early in the second half.
 As far as the ego thing, I think all great receivers develope that about not getting the ball. Its like their drug.

by GonzoBlue on Feb 15, 2010 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

Collie wide open

I can’t believe I haven’t heard more about how Collie was wide open for a 1st down. Something obviously went wrong with Wayne’s route though.

by 18to87FTW on Feb 15, 2010 10:05 AM EST reply actions  

I think

the biggest reason why people don’t bring that up is because Wayne is the #1 look in that play. On top of that, manning had complete pressure up the gut so unless he looked at Collie as the #1 he wouldn’t have gotten the chance to even get to Collie.

But in saying that I think I would’ve rather seen Manning take a sack or throw the ball away in that one. Sadly it just becomes a bunch of “what ifs” but yea…

by razielzsoul on Feb 15, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually to me it looked like the pressure was coming from his left

CJ was getting manhandled and couldn’t keep track of his guy. And Peyton got rid of just in time.

by Naptime! on Feb 15, 2010 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

When I watched that played

I couldn’t believe how open Collie was. I mean, it wasn’t a 20 yard space, but easily 5-8 yds or even more depending on Collie’s effort.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions  

YES

I posed that below before I started reading the rest of the posts! Collie was wide open and would have easily had the 1st down. He was crossing the middle of the field too so he had to be right in front of Peyton before he threw it.

Oh well….

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 15, 2010 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Would Collie reach 1st down line?

Collie ran underneath route and he was open short of 1st down line. He knows to drop fast thrown passes and he might been tackled immediately after catch ‘cause defenders are very close to him.
If he’d (despite it all) – caught the ball , I’m not sure if he would be able to make couple extra yards after catch enough for first down, he is rookie and not so reliable WR like a Wes Welker who is best in the league for that route.
Maybe Peyton should try risky pass for Dallas Clark down deep for a TD….

by dvbpirate on Feb 16, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you watch the replay again?

Collie was somewhat open, but Clark had beaten his coverage and was WIDE open, as in gone for 6 pts. I’m not criticizing Peyton for going to his #1 look, but if he’d glanced to the right and just lofted the ball, the game is tied. He had just enough time to do this before the pressure got there.

by FourAces on Feb 16, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll rewatch the pick-6 for you

Of course, it’ll take several tries to properly ascertain Wayne’s effort, maybe even more…

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte

Stampede Blue's Resident Steelers Fan

"[T]he Steelers have been evil pieces of crap for a long time who play dirty and seek to injure their opponents, and one day there will be a reckoning."
FriarBob

Can't you just feel the love?

by LV Steelers Fan on Feb 15, 2010 10:11 AM EST reply actions  

X-(

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

On the pick I don't think there was anything Wayne could have done to change the outcome once the route/throw was wrong

though him just stopping the route once Porter was well past him about to pick the ball looked bad.

On the Colts last play the pass to him was catchable but not easy.

by shake n bake on Feb 15, 2010 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

Manning

might have led him a little too much, but I still think Reggie wasn’t doing everything he could to get to the ball. I still think his cut wasn’t very sharp to the inside. Probably his knee though.

by redmid17 on Feb 15, 2010 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

You have a #93 guy

busting his ankle in the biggest stage of them all so, I expect his teammates to do the exact same thing. Call it pride, teamwork or dignity, but you have to play like there was no tomorrow because, there wasn’t actually.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea, but

running at full speed and making sharp cuts seems a lot harder on your knee/ankle than doing what Freeney did. On Freeney’s big plays he wasn’t making any cuts, he was just bull-rushing and over-powering the Saint’s weak LT.

Like shake n bake says, there was nothing Wayne could have done. Porter knew what was going to happen and was baiting Manning into throwing that. Manning threw a shitty pass that never should have been thrown.

by Brothersko on Feb 15, 2010 6:58 PM EST up reply actions  

If he had known Tracy were that close

He could have made an effort to box him out.

That being said, there was no way for him to know with certainty – his back was turned, and last I checked, he doesn’t have eyes in the back of his head.

Wayne played injured. I’m giving him a free pass on this one.

"There are those that make it happen, those that watch it happen, and those that stand around and wonder what the hell happened." -- Drew Brees

by J of the F on Feb 15, 2010 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: Valentine's Day Sucks thread

It’s at 1800 comments now, BBS. Yes, we are all beasts!!!

Peyton Manning makes it Wayne on them hoes!!!!

by KMR24 on Feb 15, 2010 11:32 AM EST reply actions  

You're gonna shut it down

like a meth lab in some rural, country house down south?!

Peyton Manning makes it Wayne on them hoes!!!!

by KMR24 on Feb 15, 2010 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Shake would know about that,

being in Iowa.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I think KMR24 meant Texas. Them rednecks down there know meth.

Because uh, Iowa isn’t that far south?

"There are those that make it happen, those that watch it happen, and those that stand around and wonder what the hell happened." -- Drew Brees

by J of the F on Feb 15, 2010 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Any southern state will do

I’m from Tennessee and a few months ago I saw a lot of police cars parked behind a van near I-40 that happened to be a mobile meth lab.

Peyton Manning makes it Wayne on them hoes!!!!

by KMR24 on Feb 15, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

That ain't shit...

I live in Indiana and there’s a meth lab bust in my town at least once a week. Mobile ones are common.

by peytonsurdaddy on Feb 15, 2010 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I've seen one blow up

it was AWESOME

Indianapolis Colts, taking focus away from my DBacks every Sunday.

by AJforAZ on Feb 16, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

You're mean.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 19, 2010 7:12 AM EST up reply actions  

I was mostly referring to the rural, country part.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 16, 2010 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

So,

2,000 is the magic number now?

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

He can shut that thread down

but he can’t stop us!

"Fans are the only ones who really care. There are no free-agent fans." - Dick Young

by NYKings on Feb 15, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

We'll just come back from the ashes

stronger, like the Phoenix.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Ignoring that.....

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Something was wrong with him

but I choose to believe it was the knee. Reggie has made alot of big plays for us and has earned my confidence.

by FineClub on Feb 15, 2010 11:41 AM EST reply actions  

I think it was his knee

That was too big of a game for Reggie to let a little Randy Moss come out of him.

Peyton Manning makes it Wayne on them hoes!!!!

by KMR24 on Feb 15, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Reggie is a man

and doubt he will use it as an excuse to defend himself. I am sure he is sick over it without scumbag MSM rubbing his nose in it.

by FineClub on Feb 15, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

That knee definetly bothered him, couldn’t sold his comeback routes all night long.

But there is no excuse, that
- he wasn’t chased Porter all the way,
- didn’t catch the ball at the end.

Reggie is my man, but that was a poor game from him. (btw: damn injuries…even on the last practice of the year…)

by Gio on Feb 15, 2010 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I still don't know how he dropped that 4th and Goal Pass that hit him in the hands.

"Pressure is something you feel if you don't know what the hell you're doing."-Peyton Manning

by P0RKINS2 on Feb 15, 2010 12:09 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Eh.

We still would have lost.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

You still have to catch it.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Point taken.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: I miss football already.

by Cassieper on Feb 15, 2010 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Anyway, even though I'm disappointed with Reggie (and Caldwell, and the ST's, etc)

I believe next year, they will absolutely go for it all. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a replay of the 04 season and having the Colts destroying everyone because, they actually can…

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Boy,

Wouldn’t that be nice. I can’t help feeling bad for the Colts – but especially for Peyton who keeps getting labeled a choker by the idiot media. At least Peter King sort of came to his rescue in SI today – but he still suggested that history shows Peyton can’t win the big one. How many big ones do you have to win before people stop saying that? Two? And what is “the big one”? Just the SB? So if you play like crap the entire year, but manage to get into the playoffs and win the SB then you are better than someone who played stellar the whole season, into the playoffs, but lost the SuperBowl by a team that outcoached you (and your rookie coach)? Just sayin…

by buymymonkey on Feb 15, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

Peyton is the reason I became a Colts fan. If he ever plays for some other team (God i hope not) I will still root for the Colts but also for Manning, wherever he is.
He deserves to be considered the best ever. He has played like a God, loves this game more than anyone, puts his heart on it, he has resisted all that stupid trash thrown at him (which makes absolutely no sense), has earned that paycheck eveysingle season (love that quote from him), has redefined the game: simply the best ever.
He deserves the rings not because its what the media considers to determine greatness, but because its the ultimate trophy in this sport.
Imagine if he retires with 5 rings…God, for all I know he deserves 18…

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly

I will take 1 more ring for him….anything more than he has now is a plus.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 15, 2010 6:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I completely agree.

I would, of course, like him to get many more simply because he is the awesomest!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 15, 2010 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

also

I love Reggie and everything he has done for the Colts and a bad game for him, no matter if its the SB or the season kickoff, won’t make me forget that.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady

by BlueMark1821 on Feb 15, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Gracious

I logged onto IndyStar to see the comments on Kravitz article, which was a pretty good one, and goodness gracious. People are such haters. In between Saints fans posting “Who Dat” like a million times, and other folks trying to drag politics into this (“Obama is Hitler, and so are the Colts” (?)) – I am so glad that StampedeBlue is around.

by buymymonkey on Feb 15, 2010 2:49 PM EST reply actions  

We get trolls here too....

we just bother running them out of here. We also focus on more important things than politics around here, like poker and KY ads.

by FineClub on Feb 15, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Illegal block in the back !!!

I dunno … how no one didnt see illegal block-in-the-back committed by Saints Defensive End Will Smith (#91) on Peyton Manning.watch it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGO3egNOYwU or http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&entry_id=56893
If we add on that , earlier blown call by officials on 2 point conversations , it’s clearly that we had very bad officiating in most important game of the season that cost us at least 9 points.

On Wayne: Lately he played poorly , he couldnt make a separation , rarely beat corner back , which is very strange for WR that caliber.Only play in SB was on 4th down in 4th quorter when Peyton threw quick slant toward Reggie it was good for gain of 14y and first down, but that drive was finished with missed field goal…

by dvbpirate on Feb 15, 2010 3:57 PM EST reply actions  

Y'know what?

I had thought when I’d originally heard this mentioned that it was a “grasping” sort of argument—until I watched it just now. You’re absolutely right, that was unquestionably a block in the back and shouldn’t have resulted in a touchdown. Still would have been an interception, but it would have been Saints’ ball on the 50-ish (I think), and our defense might have had some chance to do something. Given how the game was to that point, I kinda doubt they would have done much of anything, but you never know.

Anonymity breeds inhumanity. In simpler terms, don't be a troll.

by linkish on Feb 15, 2010 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Manning presented his back

You can’t draw a foul.

That’s like taking a dive in soccer. It’s childish but funny to watch.

"There are those that make it happen, those that watch it happen, and those that stand around and wonder what the hell happened." -- Drew Brees

by J of the F on Feb 15, 2010 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Where is that in the rulebook?

Manning was trying to locate the ball carrier, who only at the point of the block crossed back inside.

Again, this is not a slight against your team in any way, like they were the beneficiaries of a non-call; they won the game, they are the winners. Even had that been flagged, I really have no doubt Brees would have punched it in. Call the spade a spade, though. Aaron Rogers got facemasked, and Peyton got blocked in the back. Doesn’t change history, doesn’t make the wins by the other teams less significant.

Anonymity breeds inhumanity. In simpler terms, don't be a troll.

by linkish on Feb 16, 2010 3:42 AM EST up reply actions  

It might not be in the rulebook...

but that’s not something that is generally called. If you over-run the ball-carrier and present your back to a blocker, you don’t have much of a chance to get a call.

Officiating in any game is not perfect, and the SB gets scrutinized more than any other game. Fans of the losing team will always bitch and moan about missed calls. This isn’t a missed call you should bitch about. Peyton didn’t deserve a call in this instance.

by Brothersko on Feb 16, 2010 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Did Peyton was over-run tracy porter...

Did Peyton was over-run tracy porter or he’s just been pushed while he was trying to stop Portrer.I think if he wasn’t been pushed in the back he would tackle Tracy Porter or slow him down or disrupt him. Why would #91 Will Smith touches Peyton if he over-running Tracy Porter ? Anyway #91 did mistake and he got away with it.
Saints won game righteously , i give them a credit , hat off to them , this is not whining or moaning , I just want to see exactly what happened on that play.

by dvbpirate on Feb 16, 2010 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Can't fully understand your poor English but...

Yes, Manning over-ran Porter, since his back was to Porter as Porter ran by him.

You mention how you’d like to see what happened on that play, why don’t you just look it up on Youtube? Perhaps you should not be speculating and arguing with people about the play if you haven’t even seen the play.

by Brothersko on Feb 16, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

What happened first...

What happened first : Manning over-run Porter or Manning been hit and then over-run Porter. I think second choice was right what happened there. If Manning over-run Porter why would Smith even touch him? That is ridiculous. And I’m not arguing with anyone, Im sorry if you offended by any of my comments , it wasn’t my intention. I don’t think that I’m insulted anyone.

by dvbpirate on Feb 16, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Manning over-ran Porter

I guess this is where your opinion differs from mine.

And I don’t think it is “ridiculous” to think that a player would block a defender near the ball-carrier.

by Brothersko on Feb 16, 2010 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

It's ridiculous ....

If Manning was ran-over (like u said) Porter , if Manning was running away from him , why would any-buddy block Manning ?

by dvbpirate on Feb 17, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

It happens all the time

Just because a QB isn’t going to make a tackle, doesn’t mean he isn’t going to be blocked. Players salivate at the chance to hit a QB and will do it any chance they get, especially if the QB is in the same vicinity as the ball-carrier like this situation.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

It happens all the time....

….that during the return someone is been illegally blocked or hold and officials often nullify TD.
This time problem was also that we played against all…Whole world wants to see Saints win SB, refs help them and now they trying to justify their mistakes. Just couple of them have enough dignity to say that officials little help them, even that confession is nothing going to change at all…
And I want to repeat that we dont lost the game because of officials , Saints victory is clear, I just want to point that refs contributed in our L

by dvbpirate on Feb 17, 2010 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Right

There was a vast conspiracy, everyone was against you, the officials made sure that their calls went against you, blah blah bullshit.

This is the same shit that Cardinals fans said after last Superbowl, the same shit Patriots fans said 2 years ago, the same shit Bears fans said 3 years ago, and the same shit Seahawk fans said 4 years ago. If a team loses a superbowl, its’ fans are going to be whiny and bitch about how the refs screwed them. This is a fact of life.

If you want to argue about whether this was a missed call, then do it, but don’t bring in this conspiracy bullshit about how the refs wanted to see the Colts lose.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 4:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I have to say

I thought this was one of the most cleanly reffed (is that a word?) Super Bowls. I actually believe Holmes did not get his right toe down, but that’s a matter for placing cameras at field level.

I’m GLAD we’re not really talking about bad calls (only a few are), and that we’re talking about the fact that the Saints simply outplayed the Colts.

NO EXCUSES

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 17, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

There's the right attitude

I thought it was clean as well. This is coming from a fairly unbiased source(only had $25 riding on the Colts) and I thought the refs let them play and only called what they had to.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I didnt say it was conspiracy

you deliberately did wrong interpretation of what i was saying – I never said or mention conspiracy. Here’s my list of reasons why Colts lost SB
1. Saints played better when it counts most – in second half
2. Refs helped them (i dont know why, is it deliberately , but it’s fact)
3. We actually played in NO at Superdome not in Miami – Colts played against whole people in Miami .
Its very difficult to win when you see that reasons

by dvbpirate on Feb 18, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

You said:

The refs wanted to see the Saints win and so they helped them win. I would say that is the definition of a conspiracy. You don’t have to actually say the word “conspiracy” for you to accuse the officials of such.

We actually played in NO at Superdome not in Miami – Colts played against whole people in Miami

What the fuck are you talking about? You played in Miami at a neutral site. If there weren’t enough Colts fans there, then that is your fault and the fault of all Colts fans. This excuse is just sad.

by Brothersko on Feb 18, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

It was the same as in NO at Superdome...

for us it was like a road game, they can say they played home game.
Refs are people too, no matters how much they were trying to stay neutral, i believe they reflected that hype – liked to see Saints win SB i dont know perhaps it was subconsciously or so….

by dvbpirate on Feb 18, 2010 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

So

one of your excuses for why the Colts lost is that it was like a road game. Big fucking deal. You only have yourself and other Colts fans to blame for not going to the game.

Tickets weren’t reserved for just Saints fans. If another team has more fans than you do, then too bad. Super Bowls aren’t known for being loud anyways.

by Brothersko on Feb 18, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

This is pointless...

i would go more to post, but that would be pointless…I cant convince you in some thinghs, also you cant convince me….this is the point where I give up….
OK, let be one thing that we can agree and let it be on me: My english is sucks !!

by dvbpirate on Feb 18, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

They'd have been in the same vicinity

if Porter had not cut inside. Obviously I strongly doubt Manning would have made the tackle even had he not be blocked, but I think it’s pretty clear that he was. All you have to do to “present your back” to a blocker is be in front of him.

Anyhow, I’m not bitching about this call/non-call because as I stated, I don’t believe it would have changed the outcome of the game. What I am bitching about is enforcement of rules. If rules are on the books, they should be enforced; otherwise, take them off the books. Same goes for holding on defensive ends (not just ours): if the rule is there, call it consistently. Otherwise, what’s the point?

It actually does remind me a bit of the incident after the AFC title game those years ago when Polian complained to the rest of the competition committee about how the Patriots’ DB’s were playing the Colts’ receivers. The reason the committee raised the issue with the league office and the referees is because the rule was on the books, but it wasn’t being enforced. If I remember, Jeff Fisher had the same gripe, and was also on the committee at the time.

All any NFL fan should ask for, really, is consistency in officiating. If my team is guilty of the penalty, so be it.

Anonymity breeds inhumanity. In simpler terms, don't be a troll.

by linkish on Feb 16, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

"All you have to do to "present your back" to a blocker is be in front of him"

I’m not sure I fully understand what you’re trying to say there.

The enforcement of the rule WAS actually called consistently in this situation as per the rule book. As tigerpaw mentioned below, the rule book reads:

It is not a block in the back if:
(a) the opponent turns away from the blocker, or;
(b) if both of the blocker’s hands are on the opponent’s side.

It appeared to me that Manning turned away from the blocker, thus “presenting his back” and making the block legal.

If you really want to bitch about something, don’t bitch about the non-call, and instead bitch about Manning’s poor attempt at a tackle.

by Brothersko on Feb 16, 2010 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

it's rare

we use “Manning” and “tackle” in the same sentence, lol. This is definitely an area where he is given a free pass… I want him running away from the ball in those situations, not toward it (see: Divisional Playoffs, NFC; Sharper, Darren; and Warner, Kurt)

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 16, 2010 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

^^this^^

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 16, 2010 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Right

Here is one area where QB’s like Manning can lose games due to his poor effort. Manning and Favre have both lost games due to poor attempts at tackling, while Ben Roethlisberger beat the Colts and went to the Super Bowl in 2006 with his tackle of Nick Harper.

I don’t mean to bash Manning too much, but perhaps if he put more effort into tackling the Colts would fare better in huge playoff games like this.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 1:21 AM EST up reply actions  

In fairness,

Nick Harper had, only days before, suffered a stab wound to his thigh from his nutty-bitch ex.

Anonymity breeds inhumanity. In simpler terms, don't be a troll.

by linkish on Feb 17, 2010 8:45 AM EST up reply actions  

And Steelers fans thank you

Miss Harper, for being a nutty bitch and “accidentally” stabbing him during an argument.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

please

Manning did not “lose” this game due to “poor effort.” Completing 31 of 45 attempts, for 333 yards is not poor effort. Winning SEVEN games throughout the season from 4th quarter deficits (some quite late) almost entirely on his play, is not “poor effort.” In that ONE play, he did in fact try to make the tackle, but he didn’t have the position and he doesn’t have the athleticism to close at that distance/angle. Your comments have crossed the line of being trollish.

Where is PUD with his graphic?

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 17, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I wasn't

saying he didn’t give his all when he was passing the ball, I really don’t give a shit about his passing stats as related to this discussion. I was trying to say QB’s like Manning, Favre, and Warner all seem to give half-hearted attempts at tackling that have ended up hurting their teams.

I’m not trying to be a troll, I just honestly think that it often looks like Manning doesn’t go all out after throwing a pick and trying to make a tackle.

Like you said, you want Manning running away from the ball-carrier and not even try to make a tackle. He gets a free pass in this department.

I see alot more effort coming out of QB’s like Roethlisberger and Mark Sanchez who sell out to make a tackle when they throw a pick.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

ok fair enough

you clearly struck a nerve with me, but thanks for responding nicely

you’re right – other QBs do give more effort in tackling, and unfortunately this situation came at the worst possible time. But he’s probably got a lot of training to NOT lay it out there, so it was likely to be an instinctual reaction.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 17, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Other QBs

Also end up injured of all their “effort” costing their teams playoff spots. Where were the Steelers in January?

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Feb 17, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Very true

Ben was injured, but that probably had more to do with his O-line sucking ass than him trying to make tackles. He is reckless though, and that recklessness has cost him some injuries. But that recklessness(through tackling, scrambling, dropping his shoulder into tacklers, etc.) has won more games than it has lost him.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Some trolls hare harder to identify than others...

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on Feb 17, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

sorry

I’ll stop criticizing Pey-pey now.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I withdraw my troll remark

like I said – he struck a nerve

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 17, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

What I'm saying

is that there is a very limited set of circumstances in which a player can actually try to intentionally draw a blocking-in-the-back penalty, and that none of those circumstances were involved on that play. Manning was attempting to take an angle on the ball carrier, and that angle didn’t end up coinciding with Porter’s angle because Manning was blocked in the back. If you freeze the video at the point that Porter pointed, you’ll see Will Smith juuuuust about to put that block on Manning. Porter at that point had not yet cut to the inside, which means that Manning would have had a shot to tackle him.

Again, I have to stress that I don’t believe Manning makes that tackle, regardless of the block and regardless of the inside cut. I don’t expect Manning to make any kind of tackle in any set of circumstances, even though he has once or twice in the past. But nevertheless, those angles would have intersected within a matter of milliseconds if Porter doesn’t make his cut. Manning couldn’t possibly have “turned away” from Smith, because he was taking a (more or less) straight angle the entire time.

Incidentally, I can’t speak for any other discussions you’ve had in this blog, but I’m enjoying the debate here thus far. Welcome.

Anonymity breeds inhumanity. In simpler terms, don't be a troll.

by linkish on Feb 17, 2010 8:43 AM EST up reply actions  

I will agree that the call was questionable

especially if you have the luxury of freezing the video and dissecting it like we can. However, watching the video at regular speed, it looked to me like Porter cut inside, Manning continued running outside with his back to Porter, and then was blocked in his back when he wasn’t facing the play.

All this happened in about a quarter of a second and was nearly impossible for a ref to see exactly what had happened on the field. So while I would call it a questionable call, I would not call it a blown or missed call.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I absolutely agree with you....

It was couple of years ago when Manning made a tackle after his interception. It was @ RCA dome… i remembering, after interception he licked his fingertips first and then made a touchdown saving tackle on opponent’s 30-35y…It was very good tackle though.

by dvbpirate on Feb 17, 2010 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Unlike Favre's illegal block of Eugene Wilson this year

costing Favre $10,000 and Wilson an injured knee.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Feb 17, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess we'll just have to take your word

Since you didn’t even tell us when it was or who they were playing. Great anecdotal evidence.

by Brothersko on Feb 17, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It was 12/02 2007 Colts played against Jags...

home game , Colts won 28-25
3-2-JAX 11(3:29) P.Manning pass short middle intended for D.Clark INTERCEPTED by R.Nelson at JAX -4.
R.Nelson to JAX 33 for 37 yards (P.Manning).

I remember very good that action

Are u satisfied , now. Are U sure you dont want video prove…but it might be forgery, you know …. better dont believe. Stay in believing that only Little Ben can do it.

by dvbpirate on Feb 18, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Ok, great

I guess the fact that Manning made a tackle 3 years ago proves me completely wrong.

by Brothersko on Feb 18, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually

If you want to be a cock about it, it was 2 years 2 months and 16 days ago. But whether it was 2 years, 3 years, or 10 years ago is beside the point.

by Brothersko on Feb 18, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

But it was illegal block no matter...

I dont know if you Colts fan or not, but in game that Colts played in 2009 (unfortunately i cant remember against who ) at Lucas Oil , Peyton threw interception , and Dallas Clark been pretty far from guy that intercepted ball , but he was completely smacked down, and officials threw the flag. Game was on the CBS an Dan Dierdorf said " Oh yes , you can ‘t do it …" , I mean everyone agreed with that call.
Same thing , happened in SB , even Pey was much closer and he might be a factor during the return if he wasn’t been pushed. And of course you can’t hear from media that officials did mistakes that hurts Colts , because all media rooted for Saints in this game…

by dvbpirate on Feb 16, 2010 4:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Regardless of foul or no foul...

our defense wasn’t stopping them in the 2nd half. It was clear that Freeney became a non-factor then, Brees had all day to throw the ball. And Hayden was playing cushions as big as Jennings. ugh.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 15, 2010 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a fact but still....

Our defense was terrible in second half and that is true, but my point wasn’t on that thing. My point wasn on that what happened during the return for TD.I dont want to diminish clear victory by the Saints but for the matter of fact that was illegal block in the back at colts 48y and if flag had been thrown , it would be Saints ball on his 42 or 37 , and our defense would get another chance to finally stop them for a once in second half…
And I heard so many times that officiating in SB was perfect and so… that’s not true. If you look game again carefully you can spot the errors. OK, but just dont say it was good officiating , we’ve been screwed for 9 points…

by dvbpirate on Feb 16, 2010 2:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Defense

In the 2nd half they were pathetic….the soft cover 2 scheme was doing nothing. I thought Caldwell should have taken a timeout during the drive immediately after the onside kick to let his defense catch a breath and I was saying that while it happened. They never recovered from the onside kick (the defense) for some reason…no pressure at all and when Freeney wasn’t in the game they still didn’t bring any pressure with LBs or a safety blitz. It was very bad to watch. I didn’t like it because the Colts would bring pressure in key situations all season long and didn’t do it in the biggest game.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 16, 2010 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

NFL officiating rule book (from the 2006 online version)

Section 3 Blocking

Legal Block

Blocking is the act of obstructing or impeding an opponent by contacting him with a part
of the blocker’s body.
A Block in the Back is a block that is delivered from behind an opponent above his waist.

It is not a block in the back if:
(a) the opponent turns away from the blocker, or;
(b) if both of the blocker’s hands are on the opponent’s side.

I think Peyton was smartly, trying to draw a penalty here; as Tracy is the fastest Saints defender…

by TigerPaw on Feb 16, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Remember when Garcon ran back to stip ed reed?

it woulda been nice to see even a little bit of hustle outta reggie after the pick.

by YaBoyBlue on Feb 15, 2010 4:18 PM EST reply actions  

sore knee and field condition

 Did anybody not notice the field wasn’t in great shape? They’d had rain, and the field was soft, and no one was cutting that well. If Reggie’s knee was even a bit sore or stiff, there is no surprise he didn’t cut that sharply. On a fast surface he probably would have been fine, but at the level these guys play even small factors like that can make a big difference.

After all the effort these guys have put in, isn’t it disgraceful that anyone listens when some idiot media starts to makeup a story about Reggie sulking.

An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...

by bluegirl on Feb 15, 2010 5:15 PM EST reply actions  

I did notice poor field condition.

Guys on both teams were slipping.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 15, 2010 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

4th Quarter route

I think it was just a miscommunication between Reggie and Peyton. Reggie wasn’t running a route that would result in a slant..it almost looked like he thought he was going to be the decoy. Collie was wide open across the middle by the way.

If anyone questions the 4th and goal play at the end of the game, Reggie didn’t even know what the play call was…he threw his hands up several times while the team was at the line and when the ball was snapped he just jogged towards the goal line because he didn’t know where he was supposed to be.

There were a lot of things that went wrong for the Colts last Sunday, but I can’t blame Reggie for the defeat.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 15, 2010 5:56 PM EST reply actions  

Maybe Reggie shoud be in slot...

Now after all that happened in that action is easy to be pundit….but sometimes Peyton playing action with Reggie in slot position and running underneath route while Collie play as outside receiver.
Or when i just remember last year situations on 3rd down when Peyton usually played on Gonzo , and often it was in back shoulder . It was pretty successful combination…. do you remember ?

by dvbpirate on Feb 16, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Just to help you

it’s called “running the play action to [player],” not “playing action with [player].” Probably not an easy distinction if – as I assume – English is not your first language. If that is the case and you plan on continuing to comment here or other SBNation boards, it might be a good idea to update your profile so people understand your background.

Otherwise, I don’t have a comment on the idea as I don’t think they put Reggie in the slot more than a couple plays throughout the year. Might be an interesting idea.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 16, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Ty 4 helping me

…but i didnt mean “play-action” . I meant on clear “gun” (shotgun) actions when Manning lines-up Wayne in slot position, and in those situations Wayne runs underneath route. I saw it couple of times , not so seldom as you said.

by dvbpirate on Feb 16, 2010 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

you're prob right

shake just made a comment in another thread about Reggie in the slot and I’m usually not watching those details…

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 16, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed with Ace of Spades

I don’t blame Reggie for the loss and I don’t blame Peyton either. In fact, I believed in that moment that the game was over unless the Colts could somehow run out the clock on that drive and force overtime.

The way the Saints were moving the ball on their last two drives, and the fact that their kicker looked like he could hit about a 75-yd FG, I felt that even if the Colts scored there, the Saints would’ve won 27-24. That 4th quarter come-from-behind magic that had been there through the first 14 games was just clearly not there.

by FourAces on Feb 16, 2010 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Reminds me of..

This sort of rush and disorganized way reminds me of the Chargers loss last season when, with Manning pinned on his own 3 yard line, the entire offensive line didn’t stand up at the snap.

Maybe with Caldwell a little more experience will yield more creative plays. Also, witha new offensive coordinator will cause Manning to take more control of the plays.

by buymymonkey on Feb 15, 2010 7:29 PM EST reply actions  

I don't think Moore is retiring

which can always change. But, I do know that Mudd already announced his retirement. And, when asked, Moore stated that he will coach until they don’t let him anymore – or words to that effect. Peyton already has more control of the plays than any other QB playing today. I would say that the game planning was too conservative (ala Dungy)…they did play not to lose instead of playing to win. Which is odd, because Caldwell hadn’t had that attitude all season.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 15, 2010 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I need to rewatch that play, but I disagree with Kuharsky

So before I go too deep into this, let me emphasize that I’m working from memory, and a re-watching of it at a later time when such won’t cause me to vomit might lead me to change my mind. But for now, this is what I remember:

I recall seeing New Orlean’s deep cover all flow right. I recall Reggie cutting his route off with only Porter in the vicinity. What I think happened was that Wayne saw an opportunity when everyone else went right, improvised by cutting off his route, then froze because he was afraid his body cues would lead Manning to throw poorly since he (Wayne) was improvising. And despite all that thinking, all Porter ended up seeing was a receiver sitting on his route, which is an easy pick if you’re willing to gamble that it’s not a stop-and-go (which in this case, it wasn’t). Regardless of whether Wayne was “dogging it” or simply sitting to give his QB an easy throw, the fact remains that he stopped and squatted in his route. The only question is, what was his rationale? I can’t see him giving up on a play in the freakin’ Super Bowl, but dogging things suggests that he was certain that the pass would go elsewhere. If that were the case, why’d he stop and turn, especially right when the deep cover guys turned to their left (Indy’s right)?

Might I be overthinking this? Oh, heck yeah; it’s entirely possible. I’ll admit it. I might be wrong. But like I said, I’m working from memory here, and it’s my honest conclusion from what I recall.

And before Kuharsky dogs Wayne for “giving up”, let’s recall that damn near everybody else on the defense saw a cue that made them go to Indy’s right (their left). Could Wayne playing “dog” have been that cue? Again, maybe I’m overthinking things, but really, one way or another the deep safety, middle linebacker, and someone else playing cover headed towards Garçon and whoever else was over there (Clark?). Something made them do that. Porter gets full credit for an “island” play, but the bulk of the defense was indeed out of position to do anything about Wayne. That’s what I recall.

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 15, 2010 8:01 PM EST reply actions  

Wayne didn't dog it

You are right…Wayne wasn’t running a quick slant, he was in the process of studder stepping about 4 times and then turning around when the pass went to the inside and Porter jumped it. I just don’t think Manning and Wayne were on the same page because Wayne ran the slant route about 4 plays before that and it worked perfectly. Either Wayne or Peyton had the wrong route and it backfired badly. I’m not going to say that Wayne dogged it or anything like that because, watching the replay several times now, Wayne wasn’t running a slant route so it was just a miscommunication.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 16, 2010 8:57 AM EST up reply actions  

So I got it somewhat right?

Hey, while you’re at it: Was I right about the deep coverage all flowing away from Wayne? I thought i spotted both (not just one) of the safeties plus someone midrange (the MLB??) flowing in the direction of the Colts right side. But I’m still too heartbroken to go dig up some clips of the play. :(

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 16, 2010 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Clark

had beaten the LB or whoever was covering him on that play. He was definitely not the 1st or 2nd read, but if we had somehow gotten the ball to him he was gone, the game was tied. The NFL Network showed the reply the other day and it is painful to see, but both Collie (somewhat) and Clark (totally) were open on the 3rd n 5. In the game audio from the Saints sideline, Sean Payton is saying over and over “don’t let Clark beat us…don’t let their best player beat us…don’t let their best player beat us…” And he was right, Dallas beat them all game, including on the infamous 3rd n 5.

by FourAces on Feb 16, 2010 10:53 PM EST up reply actions  

When you finally rewatch the game

Check out around 11:50-11:30 in the 3rd. Its when we return the KO after the NO TD. and watch the total No call on the ‘legal’ block. didnt think you could block someone without the ball to the ground and then climb on them and continue blocking them
/Justsayin’
Refs blow the whistle and then repeatedly blow the whistle.

by sandtiger812 on Feb 16, 2010 10:48 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Colts_small
The Rest of the Practice Squad
3779_small
Colts finish out practice squad
Colts_ring1_small
2009 Game Recap – Week 16: Jets at Colts
3779_small
NFL TV Map for week one
Trailerparkboys_small
Q's and A's? The depth chart and 53 man roster.
Small
The Free Agent Market Is Now Open
Small
The roster/ after I slept on it/ the duality of depth
Small
Official Cuts
Logo_-_cópia_1__small
Roster after cuts:
Small
waivers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Baltimore Ravens: It's Joe Flacco's Turn

New York Jets wide receiver Darrelle Revis signals to the fans during football practice at the new Meadowlands Stadium, Wednesday, June 16, 2010 in East Rutherford, N.J. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun) +22 updates

When You're A Jet: Darrelle Revis Agrees To Terms With New York On Extension

Photo +9 updates

Matt Leinart Reportedly Signs One-Year Deal With The Houston Texans

More from SBNation.com >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editors and Contributing Writers

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Laura_small LovinBlue