Stampede Blue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

Cleveland Browns fans remind us of why Tracy Porter picked off Peyton Manning in the Super Bowl

At first glance you are like, "What the hell? Another dumb post about this friggin' interception!" Then, after a closer look, you see that the story is not yet another misguided hate post from a writer dancing with manic glee at the fact that Peyton Manning lost a Super Bowl. Instead, we get a story that provides us with what many other stories from supposedly better writers have not: Insight.

Enter Dawgs By Nature writer rufio, who does a magnificent job breaking down how Tracy Porter was able to step in front of Reggie Wayne, pick off Peyton Manning's three-step throw, and return it for a touchdown in Super Bowl 44. From his post titled Rufio's Playbook: Breaking down Tracy Porter's Pick Six of Peyton Manning:

Wayne either slips or runs the wrong route or (in a less likely scenario) Peyton got the route wrong and threw it anyway.  My money is on Wayne being at fault, that he simply ran a poor route.  Instead of getting inside position on Porter (which should have been automatic for a guy as good as Wayne), Porter is able to jump the route and pick the ball off.

The story offers tremendous insight into how plays are called and executed, with diagrams and screen captures to show how this one play developed. The story also does not paint a very happy picture of Reggie Wayne, who (for all intents and purposes) screwed up the route and allowed Porter to make his pick. Credit Porter for reading the route and making his move. Yes, the Saints were able to score a TD off it due in part to an illegal block in the back on Manning, but whatcha gonna do? I know I don't point to that as a reason why the Colts lost.

Also, this notion that Porter and the Saints "out-prepared" the Colts is a bit silly. The Colts offense is not some chaotic mess of motion designed to confuse the opponent. Everyone knows what the Colts like to run and when they like to run it. That is certainly no secret, which is why Pat Kirwan's silly article from a few weeks ago is all the more laughable.

The Colts beat you with execution, and on this one play Reggie Wayne did not seem to execute the play very well.

Was Reggie hurt? Did he run the wrong route? Who knows. I give Reggie a pass on this because we have seen him play through pain and injuries before. We've also seen him deliver big time in the post-season and in big games (unlike, say, Randy Moss, who apparently now wants out of New England). So please, don't go hating on Reggie Wayne for this. The guy is a genuine football great, and a real student of the game. He never quits. He plays hard. He plays hurt. On this one play, he messed up. Forgive him for being human.

Many thanks to rubio for writing up this great breakdown and to Chris at DBN for posting a FanShot about it here. These are the kind of articles that are sorely lacking in the blog world and in the big media world. Articles like these are why we exist as a media entity in the first place. Fine job, gents.

0 recs  |  Comment 57 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

There's a new blog in town, the 12th HorseMan.

by KingRichard on Feb 21, 2010 9:55 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

BBS

You may need to fix the link about Moss. It took me to an error page.

"Pressure is something you feel if you don't know what the hell you're doing."-Peyton Manning

by P0RKINS2 on Feb 21, 2010 10:15 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

It took you to an error page because BBS got it wrong

Moss does not “now want out of New England.” Not expecting to be back because he doesn’t think the team will offer him a contract is different from wanting out.

“But as far as me I don’t really know. I know I would like a new contract. I think I’ve done enough to have a new contract.

“The last couple of years I’ve played through so much. You know I’ve never let the team down, as far as going out there every Sunday. I still showed at 32 years of age, now I’m 33, that I am durable. So, like I said if they want to give me a new contract I would entertain that, but I don’t really think that I’m going to be a New England Patriot next year. So, I’ll play this year out and then look for whatever the future is next.”

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Feb 21, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the blurb.

I can’t say that I’m sorry to see him go.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is one of the most underrated shows ever.

by Cassieper on Feb 22, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Why? He's been such a slouch for the Patriots...

Remember how he kept taking plays off against the Colts? More WRs might want to slack off like Moss so they can be tied for the lead in TD receptions too.

Keep the faith!

by Marima on Feb 22, 2010 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

He always brought his A-game for the Colts.

He almost single-handedly beat us this year.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is one of the most underrated shows ever.

by Cassieper on Feb 22, 2010 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Ain't that the truth!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 22, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Thnx for the link

The breakdown of that play was just awesome. I felf like my football IQ went up after reading that post by rufio.

Defense is more important than breathing.

by BetterD on Feb 21, 2010 10:29 AM EST reply actions  

I've read the article

And now I’m thinking: was that poor route run a result of his recent injury (don’t remember where, but he had one a few days before the big game) or like some people brought up here, an ego matter? We need to remember the AFCCG post-game, when Peyton talked about how Wayne teached Collie and Garçon so they’d come up big while rookies in the playoffs, maybe even trying to cheer him up for being pratically shut down by Darrelle Revis.

Of course we might have a healthy Bob Sanders for an entire season... when we play Madden

by trOOly on Feb 21, 2010 10:43 AM EST reply actions  

Reggie tweaked his knee in practice

2-3 days before the SB. I really don’t think that Peyton was trying to cheer him up with those comments about the AFCCG. Peyton always, always spreads the credit around. Just like he seemingly always takes the blame without calling anyone out.

We’ll probably never know for sure. But, that’s ok too. The entire team was off during that game. It happens sometimes. The good thing is that we’re in good shape to go back next year. (Please, God, for once no injuries for the 2010 season!)

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 21, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I've wondered about the ego issue, too

During his Media Day interview, Reggie proclaimed that their offensive game plan would be very advantageous for him (can’t remember the exact phrase he used, but I do remember being angry that he put it out there because the Saints might adjust and key on him even more). Well until that point, he was not being targeted as much as he might have expected, sooooo….

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 21, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think that play would have anything to do with ego

Reggie may have an ego, but all great WRs do. He wants the ball. But it’s hard not to read your comment as saying Reggie tanked it to prove a point. And Reggie knows as well as anyone that had he made a catch there and maybe later in the drive, maybe gotten another Super Bowl TD, he’d be that much closer to making everyone forget about Marvin Harrison, which he has to know is his real competition in terms of legacy.

And he has to know that Peyton, Collie, and Garçon understand where their bread is buttered, i.e. in a wide open hole in coverage about 10 or 20 yards from where double double teams are draped all over Wayne and Clark.

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I see your point

and didn’t mean to imply that he tanked it to prove a point. I just wonder if he had gotten frustrated as the game went on and it caused him to lose concentration or even a little bit of the fire. I don’t want to think of Reggie this way at all as he’s been the consummate teammate and player for so long, but I can’t help but wonder.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 21, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that's fair

maybe he’s a bit frustrated and loses a step because he isn’t focused

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Shannon Sharpe agrees

At the end of the video, Mike Mayock, Sterling Sharpe, and Solomon Wilcots seem to say exactly what you’ve written above about Reggie.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-playbook/09000d5d8164eafe/SB-XLIV-Playbook-Porter-s-pick

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I could be on TV!

LOL

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 21, 2010 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

You'd be better than several

people I can name.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is one of the most underrated shows ever.

by Cassieper on Feb 22, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup

Still makes me sad.

"It's the greatest job in the world until Peyton comes off the field and you think his thumb might be broken and there's three minutes left in the AFC Championship Game and you're down by three to New England and you haven't taken a snap all year. Yeah, it's a great job until that point." - Jim Sorgi

by gizzardfanny on Feb 21, 2010 10:43 AM EST reply actions  

I hate to bring this up

but if the Colts are ever 14-0 again and have everything locked up, should they rest their starters or go for 16-0? Also what if this scenario played out and we didn’t have as many players injured as we did in 2009, what would you want the Colts to do?

"Pressure is something you feel if you don't know what the hell you're doing."-Peyton Manning

by P0RKINS2 on Feb 21, 2010 11:45 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Rest

They should handle letting the fans know about the possibility better, but like I said in the past: There’s no trophy for undefeated in the regular season. There’s only one for being undefeated in the post season. I’d rather have the recuperation time. And while some other teams I think should actually keep playing, the Colts have rather clearly shown that they can pick back up after time off and execute.

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 21, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with you.

While I was upset with the decision at first in week 16, I now feel that we would not have made it to the SB without resting our players the last two games. Besides, can you imagine the potential for injury in Buffalo? I mean, they should have had on skis.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 21, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Snowboard would have been better.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is one of the most underrated shows ever.

by Cassieper on Feb 22, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

100% agreed

and not just because they were able to show this year that they could pick it up for the playoffs. I agreed with the decision at the time this year, too. Those guys looked great coming out for the first meaningful game in a month.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 21, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

undefeated

one thing that i don’t think gets brought up enough about the undefeated season is the “home field advantage” that everyone claims the saints had in the super bowl with 80% of the fans rooting for them. 1) How many more colts fans would have made the trip if undefeated was on the line? 2) How many of the 50% of fans thta are “neutral” fans – all of which ended up rooting for the saints story partially because they were sick of the colts for benching their starters would have rooted for the colts and undefeated? I know heading into week 16 alot of people were talking about how great it would be to see the colts go undefeated.

I think in reality they lost real crowd enthusiasm at the super bowl because of the benching. Whether that outweighed the risk of getting hurt it is hard to say but to say there is only plusses from the benching is silly as well.

by buzz18 on Feb 21, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

check the Pats-Giants Super Bowl

I have only anecdotal evidence, but where I was watching the game on the north side of Chicago, the living room was 5-1 in favor of the Giants. Maybe it’s because I’d thoroughly indoctrinated a bunch of Bears fans as supplicants to the altar of the Manning family, but I think schadenfreude’s a much stronger motivator than love of football purity.

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I was about to post something similar

I got the distinct feeling that people became Giants fans to root AGAINST the Pats’ getting 19-0. America loves the underdog. Period.

Also, I don’t believe that a Colts fan will all of a sudden decide to go to the Super Bowl if perfection is on the line. With ticket prices starting in the thousands of dollars, I suspect that 85% of the people who attend the SB don’t actually have a rooting interest in either team during the regular season.

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 21, 2010 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

....

This “85%” which is actually closer to 50-60% is what i was mainly talking about. That group that was all for the saints i think would have been more split.

On the pats – There is a big difference between that team and most every other team going for perfection because of the way they did it. I was rooting against the pats as were a lot of my neutral friends because they were jerks about it. If any other team such as the saints for example were going for undefeated i would have been rooting for them. From message boards earlier in the season i have a feeling that is how a lot of neutral people would have felt.

Also you have to take into consideration how much the national media was against the benching it sort of brought a patriot type of anger toward this team which pushed a lot of the neutral people more towards the saints. That much is a fact – i can’t count the number of people that said they are rooting against the colts because that is what they deserve similar to people saying that about that pats team.

by buzz18 on Feb 21, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

too many other reasons it was a saints home game

Even if I agree that the Colts being undefeated would have earned them fans, it’s still too much to ask that it would have turned fans away from the Saints, who represent the fortunes of a city almost drowned five years ago, who play much closer to Miami than the Colts, who remained a kind of lovable losers, underdog kind of franchise up to and during Super Bowl XLIV.

Yes the one guy at that party in Chicago who was rooting for the Pats was rooting for the chance to see history, but he was also a realist who wanted more to be right than to be having fun, which I don’t consider common motivation for football fans.

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

closer to 50-60%

interesting – I would never have guessed (obviously, because I guessed 85%, LOL)

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 21, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

thats the number

that everyone kept throwing out there before the super bowl. Don’t think all of them would have been swayed but i think there would have been plenty…maybe enough to make it closer to a “neutral” game…85% is a reasonable guess though

by buzz18 on Feb 21, 2010 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Mind if i play both sides for a sec?

Why are resting and winning mutually-exclusive? Shouldn’t we expect our backups to beat a team like Buffalo?

note… forget the ice & snow for a sec. Let’s assume a decent field; maybe even a home game in weeks 16 & 17.

Take SS – If Sanders stays healthy, Bullitt is your backup. Sit Sanders, and play Bullitt. He’s more than good enough to get the job done.

CBs? – Sit Hayden for the last couple, and get him healthy. Lacey can down-right PLAY! Put him on the field and expect him to get the job done.

Why not expect to win with backups? Isn’t that the goal of the draft; to get quality backups?

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on Feb 21, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we can win with backups here or there

but to expect to win with 100% backups (and in this year’s case some positions had #3 or #4 on the depth chart out there), seems optimistic

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 21, 2010 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Understood.

Still, there are only 53 players on a team; you can’t sit them all.

Also, ‘rest’ doesn’t have to mean they don’t play at all.

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on Feb 21, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe

For every backup we got that justifies the “Next Man Up” philosophy – Bullitt and Session certainly fit this description – you have backups that simply can’t give the same level of production. Painter, due to his experience, was an example of this during the past year, and it’s a bit much to ask that poor guy to face any NFL starters, even Buffalo’s, with so little experience. And while everyone likes Keiaho – I love the guy – can anyone honestly argue that there’s no dropoff when he’s in?

Let’s remember: Jennings is what, 3rd string? He was pressed into service out of necessity, and would often get picked on due to the spacing he gave (although I’ll insist to the day he retires that he could at least solo tackle once he got there… a plus above others in the backfield). My point here is that we’ve already seen what happens when we ask a backup to function in a starter’s place: We see opponents convert and get new sets of downs. Jennings is our representative case.

So of course you’d expect backups to win anyway. You don’t put them out there and say “it’s okay not to execute; we understand”. But at the same time, you remember back in training camp and the preseason who outperformed who, and why the 2nd and 3rd stringers were on the bench: Because they didn’t perform up to the starter’s levels. So you give them every chance, but you also recognize that they’re not as capable.

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 21, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Nicely said.

Maybe it’s HOW we rest our players that i’m questioning. The wholesale change that pits all our 2nd and 3rd stringers against the other team has got to make it pretty easy for the opponent to create havoc.

I dunno; just seems like the team might have a better chance of winning meaningless games if starters played their ‘pitch count’ of 30 plays, or whatever, as part of a mixed unit (starters and backups) instead of playing all first-string for the first quarter and then not seeing the field again.

It would also put the backups on the field with many of the starters; a more real-world scenario… one they’d actually experience if a starter were injured.

Just thinking out loud here…

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on Feb 21, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we could win with backups.

With Sorgi playing. But by then he was IR’d and that left only painter. We have pretty darn good backups, the biggest drop-off is at QB, obviously.

Perhaps we could win with Painter next year, but I doubt it. I know he has alot of fans here, but I’m not too high on him – and haven’t been since they decided to spend an extra roster spot on him. But that’s just me.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on Feb 21, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

the NFL's too competitive to expect that

But I think it’s still a fair point. If we were going to be angry after the first Jets game, we should have been angry at the Hank Basketts, Jacob Laceys, and Ervin Baldwins who blew kickoff coverages and dropped passes. Or, alternatively, at ourselves for believing the Colts were so dominant their backups could win games in the NFL.

I maintain (and always you can check my comments for confirmation) that Polian and Caldwell made the right decision, that they made that decision in a rather decisive and inspiring way, and that if they are to be blamed it’s for mishandling fan reaction after the fact. In hindsight, as they tried to get another strong week of practice, it made sense to keep their intentions a bit cloudy to fans and players alike.

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

yup... good points.

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on Feb 21, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Part of me hopes

that their is a team another team in the AFC with a good enough record, that the Colts HAVE to go undefeated to get Home-Field Advantage. Now I agree that the rest helped the team however, if you clinch home-field in Week 16 and the Season Finale is a home game, do you go for 16-0 if you’re already 15-0?

"Pressure is something you feel if you don't know what the hell you're doing."-Peyton Manning

by P0RKINS2 on Feb 21, 2010 1:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

the league's mediocrity is not the Colts' fault

so yeah, I agree with you, if the league wants every game to be significant, the other 31 teams need to step up and make it so

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Hopefully

They are never 14-0 again so we don’t have to worry about it.

I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by AceOfSpades on Feb 21, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't want them to be 14-0 again?

I sure do.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: This is one of the most underrated shows ever.

by Cassieper on Feb 22, 2010 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

+14-0

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Feb 22, 2010 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Good writeup

The last two screenshots do show what I thought I remembered. If you look, you’ll see that the coverage had followed Collie and Clark across the middle and left Porter alone back there on the proverbial “island”. Hey, my memory’s not so bad after all! Photobucket

Also, I agree with his assessment (below, in bold):

At this point I am guessing Peyton doesn’t think he has to worry about what the extra defender is doing because he knows 1. he is getting rid of the ball as quickly as possible on a 3 step drop, and 2. his receiver is in a matchup he should win every time. So he doesn’t care about reading the entire defense, and he really doesn’t have the time. We do.

To put it in plain language, he read the defense keying in on Clark and Collie, and leaving Porter one-on-one with Wayne. Manning is supposed to make that throw. But with Reggie not in the right spot… well, we know what happened.

Photobucket

________


As a final topper on this: Remember what that idiot Peacesign kept on blathering about? Manning supposedly staring Reggie down the whole time? No: He stared Collie down. He had to be; that’s the only explanation for the other defenders flowing towards the middle (plus, it’s the only way he could’ve cheated a look at Clark): They were chasing Collie. The Colts 3rd down possesion receiver running a route towards the middle on a play that looks like it’s just a plain “moving the chains” route was ripe for Manning to read a one-on-one matchup elsewhere and gain a touchdown where one wasn’t readily available at first. Manning made a terrific read, and Wayne being out of place for probably the only time that game ended up being painfully costly.

Most of the time, a small mistake like what Wayne made is nothing more than an incomplete. And we all know that little mistakes like that happen somewhere every game. This one was painful because it was ill timed. But what it was not was a bad read by Manning. On the contrary, it was a brillliant read. But it was a brilliant read that got outplayed by the defense. Porter was still smart enough to jump the route, because all he saw was an inside pass and a receiver not breaking towards it properly. Pro-caliber corners will always react instinctively to that. But at the same time, Porter only had two players to read. Manning had however many where on Reggie’s side of the field.

I’m going to bookmark rufio’s post. If anyone brings up the stupid “choke” meme, I’ll steer them towards it. If they still keep on with Manning “choking”, then it’ll be beyond obvious that they don’t care about the truth, they’ll only be caring about blathering on stupidly.

Cue Peacesign with his stupidity in 4… 3… 2…

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 21, 2010 12:01 PM EST reply actions  

Peacesign's been banned

4 times now. Apparently he doesn’t get the concept of IP addresses yet.

by shake n bake on Feb 21, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

He doesn't get much at all

IP addresses are the least of the things on the list of things he doesn’t get. Anyway, thanks for the info; he’s sure earned what he’s gotten.

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on Feb 21, 2010 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

porter did make a great play

I think it’ll just have to be accepted that Porter made the right read on the right play at just the right time, with the same caveat that goes into every great play, that if you execute correctly over and over and over again, eventually you’re going to get a break. Shake could probably say that with a bit more precision.

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

communication breakdown

a few plays away from tying up the super bowl peyton and reggie had a communication error. no pointing of fingers simply just a breakdown. i bet they will be in the super bowl again and will not make that mistake then! as a die hard colts fan i truly was not crushed but left smiling at drew brees in his moment and remembering the colts big moment. also knowing that peyton is one of the greatest players to ever step foot on the field i am confident they will be back.

by jakew on Feb 21, 2010 2:23 PM EST reply actions  

glad BBS posted this

but I also wish the generosity of spirit that he extends toward Reggie Wayne were apparent more often lately. I read this site because of good things BBS said about much-maligned guys like Tim Jennings and Key Dawson earlier this year, noting that however unlucky both those guys got in terms of physical talent, they both are remarkably tough-minded team players. that’s level-headed and football smart.

but Randy Moss caught the TD to put the Pats up in the Super Bowl, and as inconsistent as his commitment to a team may be, he’s hardly a “choker.” It’s as irrational to say that about Moss as it is to say it about Peyton. It’s much less frustrating to me when someone says Peyton’s an asshole than he’s called a choker, because in the first case we can all acknowledge the subjective source of the claim, but the second makes a claim to truth for which the person who makes the claim so obviously has no real concern.

by Louisville Soul Train on Feb 21, 2010 3:23 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

  For many years Archie Manning dreamed of throwing the winning pass and have the New Orleans Saints win the Super Bowl.
  Now all these many years later the son has done what the father could not..

by Allikatzpop on Feb 21, 2010 5:28 PM EST reply actions  

Lol @ illegal block in the back (are u serious?), Reggie never quits (he dogged it the whole game), and Reggie messed up on that ONE play (conveniently forgetting the game-tying TD he dropped moments before).

There’s pulling for your team, and then there’s the idiotic rantings of sour, blind-faithed homer desparately reaching for excuses weeks after a lame effort from his team in the biggest game of the year.

by Crackback on Feb 21, 2010 5:39 PM EST reply actions  

excellent analysis

is there a site where this sort of analysis of play is consistantly broken down? this stuff is great.

by EBforPresident on Feb 21, 2010 7:01 PM EST reply actions  

There have been several other times in which rufio has done posts like this regarding Browns plays. Other times, rather than analyzing a specific play, he just explains in general the purpose of certain coverages and/or routes being run (i.e. the philosophy behind them). You should be able to find them in the archives of DBN; just look for any of rufio’s posts.

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Feb 21, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks man

That is exactly the kind of information I was hoping to find.

by EBforPresident on Feb 23, 2010 12:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Wayne had to do...

almost the same thing that he did earlier in the 4th qtr when he caught ball on 4th and 2 for gain of 14yards. On that play he jumped in front of defender, caught the ball for about 5 yards gain, and found space to run for more 10 (extra) yards.
And on the last play he had to catch ball no matter if it was practice or SB defining moment or just play that extends our hope…It must be TD no matter of result and time remaining.
If he was injured why he didnt say that he cant play.
My opinion is that he should to play better in SB, to make separations and beat the coverage more often than he did that night.

by dvbpirate on Feb 22, 2010 6:35 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!
Start posting about the Colts »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Peyton-manning_small
Realistic Expectations for This Season
Small
Why every NFL fan should oppose an 18-game season
34761_446275315756_117533210756_6030598_1438552_n_small
MY Views On Reggie Wayne, And Why They Should Be Important, Front Page Or Not
Pick_small
My View on BBS's views of Reggie Wayne

Recent FanPosts

1565007530_small
Sam Bradford - Signs his contract
Jojo-avatar_small
keeping in mind what is important
File002_small
Best WR combos ranked, Colts # 11 with Wayne & Gonzalez
File002_small
New rule could affect ( HURT ) hurry-up offenses
Indianapolis_colts_20mad_colt-1_small
Which Draft Choice will be the last to sign?
Indianapolis_colts_20mad_colt-1_small
Precamp Predictions NFC
21_small
Where in the World is Marvin Harrison??
Indianapolis_colts_20mad_colt-1_small
Precamp Predictions
Small
Don Banks and Failure

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Washington Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth signs autographs during the NFL football team's training camp and fan appreciation day, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009, at Redskins Park in Ashburn, Va. (AP Photo/Nick Wass) +4 updates

NFL Training Camps News: Albert Haynesworth Fails Conditioning Test For Second Day In A Row

FILE - This Dec. 6, 2009, file photo shows Minnesota Vikings wide receiver Percy Harvin running against the Arizona Cardinals during the first half of an NFL football game in Glendale, Ariz. Percy Harvin used his versatility and intelligence to win The Associated Press 2009 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year award for 2009. (AP Photo/Matt York, File) +2 updates

Percy Harvin Carted Off Field With Injury, Returns To Practice Later In Day

Philadelphia Eagles head coack Andy Reid, left, talks with wide receiver DeSean Jackson during the morning session of NFL football training camp at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pa. on Saturday, July, 31, 2010. (AP Photo/Rich Schultz)

DeSean Jackson Carted Off Field With Back Injury

More from SBNation.com >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small BigBlueShoe

Site Editors and Contributing Writers

Bob-sanders-081107_small shake n bake

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Shane_vereen_small LovinBlue

Naruto_rasengan_by_kishoto_small Cassieper

Contributing Writers

Jakesbshot_small Jake Whitacre