Inside the Numbers 2009 - Season Review
Throughout the season, we've been looking at the Winning Stats, and how they've played out in each Colts game. We also looked at the running Season Total, and saw just how well the Offense and Defense were playing. I hope it gave you some insight into what makes a winning NFL football team, at least statistically.
What I thought I'd do is show you the final numbers from the season, the final Power Rankings and Strength of Schedule, Game by Game rankings for the Colts, and some of the best games by any team in 2009. One note as well: These stats include Curtis Painter time, as the Colts weren't the only team to rest starters, so instead of adjusting a whole bunch of games, I just put the actual stats in there.
Let's get to it, as there are quite a few tables after the jump:
Colts Season Stats (including Playoffs):
| Statistic | Offense | Rank | Best | Defense | Rank | Best | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSR | 77.2% | 1 | Colts | 70.2% | 19 | Jets | 114-10 | 0.919 |
| ANPY/A | 7.099 | 7 | Saints | 5.213 | 11 | Bills | 135-11 | 0.925 |
| Turnovers | 1.42 | 5 | Chargers | 1.63 | 18 | Saints | 125-30 | 0.806 |
| Yds/Drive | 35.78 | 2 | Saints | 31.46 | 24 | Jets | 105-15 | 0.875 |
| ToP/Drive | 2:45.5 | 15 | Steelers | 2:57.1 | 31 | Vikings | 118-32 | 0.787 |
| Yds/Play | 5.913 | 5 | Saints | 5.105 | 11 | Jets | 106-21 | 0.835 |
| First Downs/Drive | 2.11 | 1 | Colts | 1.81 | 28 | Jets | 98-25 | 0.797 |
| 3rd/4th Down | 48.0% | 2 | Dolphins | 42.9% | 27 | Jets | 104-23 | 0.819 |
| Avg Start Pos | 27.2 | 31 | Vikings | 28.7 | 11 | Cowboys | 118-39 | 0.752 |
| 3 and Outs | 3.05 | 5 | Cowboys | 3.26 | 31 | 49ers | 79-27 | 0.745 |
| RZ Eff | 75.2% | 2 | Cardinals | 61.2% | 8 | Saints | 85-42 | 0.669 |
| Plays/Drive | 6.051 | 4 | Falcons | 6.162 | 32 | Vikings | 88-46 | 0.657 |
| Penalty Yds / Play | 0.526 | 1 | Colts | 0.810 | 13 | Packers | 87-46 | 0.654 |
| RB Success | 46.2% | 16 | Dolphins | 48.4% | 23 | Eagles | 82-51 | 0.617 |
| Yds/Carry | 3.54 | 30 | Titans | 4.22 | 15 | Ravens | 67-61 | 0.523 |
| Net Punts Yds/Game | 40.39 | 11 | Raiders | 42.49 | 30 | Patriots | 47-59 | 0.443 |
| Overall | 3 | Saints | 22 | Jets | ||||
A few thoughts:
- Even with the Curtis Painter Experience, the Colts finished 3rd Overall Offensively this season, only behind the Saints and Chargers, in terms of raw numbers. Before Week 17, the Colts were still #1, which is probably a better measure.
- There are 2 stats offensively that stick out like a sore thumb: Avg. Start Pos. and Yds/Carry. It's not surprising that these two areas should be addressed in the first 3 rounds of the draft. You can include in the Special Teams Upgrade Needed that the Colts were 3rd worst at Opponents Net Punt Yds. Please get a returner Polian.
- The Colts defense was really only above average in one area: Red Zone Efficiency. The Offense was even better than the defense, which hopefully will continue into next season.
- The best stat in 2009 in terms of wins was ANPY/A, winning 92.5% of games when both the Offense and Defense go above average. This also pushes ANPY/A over Drive Success Rate for the best stat, in terms of wins, over the past 9 seasons.
- Next season you won't be seeing Net Punting Average in the Winning Stats, as you don't win when you do it well. Actually, I just think there are more, much more important stats that overshadow it. No reason to skew the results with it.
Power Rankings (click on headers to sort):
| Team | Power Rankings | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Adjusted | Adjusted | |||||
| Offense | Defense | Total | Offense | Defense | Total | |
| Patriots | 4 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 1 |
| Packers | 6 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 2 |
| Saints | 1 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 3 |
| Vikings | 5 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| Cowboys | 7 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 5 |
| Colts | 3 | 22 | 8 | 1 | 25 | 6 |
| Jets | 22 | 1 | 11 | 22 | 1 | 7 |
| Ravens | 14 | 4 | 6 | 14 | 3 | 8 |
| Eagles | 18 | 6 | 12 | 15 | 6 | 9 |
| Steelers | 8 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 17 | 10 |
| Chargers | 2 | 23 | 10 | 3 | 28 | 11 |
| Dolphins | 13 | 18 | 16 | 11 | 15 | 12 |
| Texans | 10 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 16 | 13 |
| Falcons | 9 | 27 | 15 | 6 | 27 | 14 |
| Giants | 11 | 25 | 18 | 10 | 21 | 15 |
| Panthers | 21 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 16 |
| Bengals | 17 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 10 | 17 |
| Broncos | 20 | 8 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 18 |
| Cardinals | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 14 | 19 |
| Redskins | 16 | 21 | 21 | 17 | 19 | 20 |
| 49ers | 25 | 2 | 19 | 28 | 2 | 21 |
| Titans | 19 | 28 | 23 | 18 | 24 | 22 |
| Jaguars | 12 | 32 | 22 | 13 | 32 | 23 |
| Bills | 30 | 10 | 26 | 29 | 9 | 24 |
| Bears | 23 | 20 | 24 | 23 | 23 | 25 |
| Buccaneers | 31 | 26 | 28 | 26 | 18 | 26 |
| Seahawks | 24 | 17 | 25 | 24 | 22 | 27 |
| Chiefs | 28 | 19 | 27 | 30 | 20 | 28 |
| Lions | 26 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 30 | 29 |
| Raiders | 32 | 24 | 31 | 32 | 26 | 30 |
| Browns | 29 | 29 | 29 | 31 | 29 | 31 |
| Rams | 27 | 31 | 32 | 27 | 31 | 32 |
Even with the last two games, the Colts Opponent-Adjusted Offensive Ranking was still #1, which isn't surprising. Overall they finished 6th, which isn't too bad with how bad the defense did in these rankings. Overall the best team, according to the Winning Stats, was the Patriots, which just shows you that stats can never tell the whole story, even though they certainly help explain lots of things.
Strength of Schedule (click on headers to sort):
| Team | Strength of Schedule | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Adjusted | Adjusted | |||||
| Offense | Defense | Total | Offense | Defense | Total | |
| Buccaneers | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Panthers | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Dolphins | 9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Lions | 4 | 13 | 4 | 14 | 19 | 17 |
| Patriots | 2 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 5 |
| Giants | 11 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Raiders | 10 | 9 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 12 |
| Bills | 17 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Falcons | 1 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 16 | 4 |
| Jets | 28 | 3 | 10 | 21 | 2 | 7 |
| Colts | 6 | 19 | 11 | 5 | 21 | 13 |
| Titans | 25 | 5 | 12 | 29 | 6 | 14 |
| Cowboys | 15 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 10 |
| Bears | 8 | 20 | 14 | 18 | 20 | 21 |
| Browns | 13 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| Ravens | 26 | 6 | 16 | 31 | 7 | 16 |
| Bengals | 5 | 25 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 20 |
| Eagles | 24 | 11 | 18 | 15 | 10 | 11 |
| Rams | 14 | 21 | 19 | 22 | 24 | 25 |
| Saints | 18 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Broncos | 31 | 10 | 21 | 30 | 11 | 18 |
| Chiefs | 27 | 16 | 22 | 25 | 17 | 22 |
| Vikings | 16 | 27 | 23 | 19 | 27 | 26 |
| Redskins | 30 | 17 | 24 | 20 | 13 | 15 |
| Cardinals | 22 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 25 | 28 |
| Jaguars | 20 | 30 | 26 | 16 | 26 | 24 |
| Steelers | 21 | 28 | 27 | 23 | 30 | 29 |
| Chargers | 12 | 31 | 28 | 7 | 31 | 23 |
| Seahawks | 23 | 29 | 29 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| Texans | 29 | 26 | 30 | 26 | 23 | 27 |
| 49ers | 32 | 22 | 31 | 32 | 22 | 31 |
| Packers | 19 | 32 | 32 | 24 | 32 | 32 |
The Colts finished with the 11th toughest schedule, with the offense facing a tougher schedule than the defense. I like using the Non-Adjusted rankings for this, as it has less theoretical calculations going into it, thus less error. I think to make it accurate we need to use the raw numbers for it, but I've included the Adjusted SoS as well, in case you're interested.
Game by Game Rankings (click on headers to sort):
| Colts | Opponent | Non-Adjusted | Adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Offense | Defense | Total | Offense | Defense | Total | |
| 1 | Jaguars | 106 | 223 | 116 | 206 | 184 | 160 |
| 2 | Dolphins | 112 | 477 | 323 | 89 | 479 | 279 |
| 3 | Cardinals | 161 | 99 | 78 | 128 | 113 | 74 |
| 4 | Seahawks | 17 | 308 | 95 | 24 | 440 | 173 |
| 5 | Titans | 60 | 47 | 24 | 91 | 48 | 33 |
| 7 | Rams | 16 | 81 | 19 | 61 | 168 | 64 |
| 8 | 49ers | 253 | 118 | 131 | 138 | 252 | 151 |
| 9 | Texans | 160 | 292 | 189 | 149 | 221 | 146 |
| 10 | Patriots | 246 | 327 | 315 | 221 | 150 | 149 |
| 11 | Ravens | 139 | 334 | 206 | 73 | 324 | 144 |
| 12 | Texans | 88 | 392 | 209 | 85 | 369 | 184 |
| 13 | Titans | 24 | 388 | 161 | 51 | 436 | 200 |
| 14 | Broncos | 301 | 216 | 256 | 250 | 259 | 241 |
| 15 | Jaguars | 31 | 495 | 259 | 103 | 490 | 308 |
| 16 | Jets | 397 | 261 | 386 | 218 | 346 | 275 |
| 17 | Bills | 503 | 403 | 505 | 496 | 520 | 529 |
| 19 | Ravens | 269 | 71 | 107 | 187 | 42 | 60 |
| 20 | Jets | 72 | 299 | 139 | 17 | 376 | 112 |
| 21 | Saints | 47 | 486 | 263 | 34 | 371 | 143 |
I've linked each game's in-depth breakdown for each week, in case you wanted to see more on that game.
The Colts played one great game (Titans), a couple other very good games, and a bunch of above average games that were good enough to win games each and every week. The Offense was not below average (> 267) in any game except Week 17, once you adjust for the Opponent. Very consistent, which is good in today's NFL.
Best Individual Game Performance (anything in red means one of multiple games):
| Statistic | Offense | Defense | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best | Team | Opponent | Best | Team | Opponent | |
| DSR | 92.5% | Steelers | Chargers | 28.6% | 49ers | Rams |
| ANPY/A | 19.458 | Saints | Patriots | -6.929 | Patriots | Titans |
| Turnovers | 0.00 | Broncos | Bengals | 7.00 | Eagles | Panthers |
| Yds/Drive | 62.13 | Steelers | Chargers | 7.20 | Jets | Bengals |
| ToP/Drive | 5:38.4 | Dolphins | Colts | 1:25.8 | Cardinals | Seahawks |
| Yds/Play | 10.171 | Colts | Dolphins | 1.758 | 49ers | Rams |
| First Downs/Drive | 4.00 | Steelers | Chargers | 0.40 | 49ers | Rams |
| 3rd/4th Down | 75.0% | Chargers | Titans | 0.0% | Packers | Lions |
| Avg Start Pos | 53.6 | Bears | Lions | 16.6 | Saints | Colts |
| 3 and Outs | 0.00 | Bills | Buccaneers | 11.00 | 49ers | Rams |
| RZ Eff | 100.0% | Bills | Patriots | 0.0% | Bengals | Broncos |
| Plays/Drive | 10.500 | Dolphins | Colts | 3.385 | Giants | Raiders |
| Penalty Yds / Play | 0.000 | Patriots | Saints | 2.574 | Ravens | Packers |
| RB Success | 75.0% | Dolphins | Chargers | 11.1% | Vikings | Ravens |
| Yds/Carry | 13.56 | Jaguars | Titans | 0.33 | Vikings | Seahawks |
| Net Punts Yds/Game | 54.50 | Falcons | Panthers | 10.67 | Eagles | Giants |
| Overall | Bengals | Bears | Cardinals | Seahawks | ||
The Colts show up on here once Offensively, in Yds/Play against the Dolphins, averaging a First Down on each and every play! I said it back in Week 2, but that's the best Yds/Play average since 1996! Pretty amazing stuff. They do show up thrice on defense as well, thanks to that Dolphins game, and the awful Avg. Start Pos. in the Super Bowl. Yep, SB XLIV was the worst of the entire year.
A couple other things:
- The Steelers dominated the Chargers offensively, yet almost blew the game at the end. That DSR is pretty amazing.
- The Saints really did put a beat-down on the Patriots Secondary, much like the Patriots defense put a beat-down on the Titans. Both of those numbers are mind-boggling to think about.
- The Lions were the only team this season to not complete a 3rd/4th Down in a game, against the Packers. The Patriots were the only team to not commit a penalty, although it didn't really help them against the Saints.
Top 10 Games of Season:
| Rank | Offense | Defense | Overall | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Opponent | Score | Team | Opponent | Score | Team | Opponent | Score | |
| 1 | Bengals | Bears | 45-10 | Cardinals | Seahawks | 27-3 | Patriots | Titans | 59-0 |
| 2 | Giants | Redskins | 45-12 | Patriots | Titans | 59-0 | Giants | Raiders | 44-7 |
| 3 | Patriots | Jaguars | 35-7 | Texans | Raiders | 29-6 | Vikings | Giants | 44-7 |
| 4 | Panthers | Giants | 41-9 | Jets | Buccaneers | 26-3 | Giants | Buccaneers | 24-0 |
| 5 | Saints | Cardinals | 45-14 | 49ers | Rams | 35-0 | Jets | Bengals | 37-0 |
| 6 | Chargers | Titans | 42-17 | Patriots | Buccaneers | 35-7 | Vikings | Bears | 36-10 |
| 7 | Steelers | Chargers | 38-28 | Jets | Bengals | 37-0 | Packers | Browns | 31-3 |
| 8 | Cardinals | Packers | 51-45 | Giants | Buccaneers | 24-0 | Falcons | Bills | 31-3 |
| 9 | Vikings | Giants | 44-7 | Falcons | Bills | 31-3 | Ravens | Browns | 34-3 |
| 10 | Jets | Raiders | 38-0 | Giants | Raiders | 44-7 | Seahawks | Jaguars | 41-0 |
Again, no Colts here, but we knew that already. Also no surprise the most dominating game this season was the 59-0 drubbing of the Titans by the Patriots. Two playoff games showed up in the Offensive top 10, with the Saints over the Cardinals, and the Cardinals over the Packers. That was a little surprising.
Didn't get enough data here? I've uploaded an Excel file, where you can see how any team did in any game this year, see how teams would have matched up at any point in the season, or see what the Power Rankings / Strength of Schedule was at any point in the season. You can also see a Game by Game Ranking for any team this year.
I've also updated the Playoff Data that I gave you earlier with the 2009 games. Let me know if you have any questions.
I have an idea about what I want to look at over the summer, and I'll write something up on it, along with a call for suggestions. I think you'll like what I'm going to look at.
14 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is as good as anything on any site, literally
Really great analysis and if it was up to me, I’d give you a good job writing for someone important. I really think this is some of the best stuff I’ve read ever on analyzing a season and games and such.
One interesting note is how good our offense was ranked in the SB. I agree that we didn’t lose that game b/c of offense, but only scoring 17 points doesn’t seem like it would warrant such a high ranking. Then again, we got tons of yards and certainly should have scored more.
"If you don't [draft me], I promise you I'll come back and kick your ass for the next 15 years."
regarding our offense this year
This is going to draw some ire, I’m sure, but I have honestly been disappointed in our offense all year long (games against the Cards, Seahawks and Rams notwithstanding). I just feel we should have really put away some of our competition more convincingly (see: first Jags game, 49ers, Ravens, first Texans games). I told myself that our philosophy was to just get the lead and protect it, but now I’m wondering whether there was something missing from our offensive firepower. My heart was tested far too many times this year, and while in years past that test came from our D, this year our O at least shared in that pain. Here’s to hoping that Polian can find and install O-Line improvements that will impact performance positively.
How can you not love a team that does this?
by LovinBlue on Feb 23, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I think you're spot on
As has been talked about quite often around here, Manning hides quite a few warts offensively. While the offense never was even below average at all this year, it really did feel like they didn’t play to their potential.
I see it as a good sign for the future. If the Colts underperformed this year, it means good things for next year.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
Rec'd.
You’re absolutely right. I think the O-line was a major issue and our skill players just did a decent job of covering it up. Setting the record for "come-from-behind victories is a great achievement, but I think it absolutely points to an issue. We should’ve been a lot more dominating.
I agree with this feeling as well
It probably had a lot to do with the fact that we never really had that many possessions and had the pressure to put up points all the time. Or that it’s really difficult to be one dimensional like we were. Either way, we definitely need to just score more.
Why the long face, Ryan Miller?
Question
First off mgrex03, thank you for taking on this amount of work week to week. I admit that I generally skimmed the tables and went straight to the conclusions, and even then didn’t really understand a lot because I never took the time to understand each stat.
I’m taking a bit more time now, and have a question regarding the Game by Game Rankings. What do the numbers mean? e.g., for Game 1, our offense had 106 non-adjusted what? yards gained? points scored? It seems that the lower the number the better, but why?
thanks
How can you not love a team that does this?
They are rankings for every game played in 2009
Based on all the stats, the raw offensive numbers were the 106th best in the NFL this season for Game 1.
To get to the rankings, I measured how good each stat was compared to the overall average from 2001-08, giving each stat a value between 0 and 1. I then multiplied that number by a “weight”, based on how important the stat is, added all stats together, and you get a number.
For example, Game 1 had an offensive value of 25.197. The actual number doesn’t mean much now, but I just ranked every game, and Game 1 for the Colts came out at 106th best. One improvement I plan for the summer is to make that value actually mean something, rather than just a number to compare with.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
ok so just to confirm
that was the 106th best offensive performance out of a total of the 256 (or however many) regular games this season? or out of all of the Game 1s that you’ve tracked over the course of x number of seasons?
How can you not love a team that does this?
Yep, these are only rankings within 2009
106th out of (256 Regular Season games + 11 Playoff Games) x 2 Teams playing in each game = 534 Games
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
ok I think I see now
each game count as 2 because you look at the offensive game and the defensive game as separate games
Thanks for explaining.
How can you not love a team that does this?
Excellent job, thanks for compiling this for everyone.
I haven’t gone through everything, but I’m sure you did your due diligence before you posted. I’d love to pick your brain about a few things, but that’s a conversation for another discussion. Thanks again, and good luck to you all next season.
If you drink O'Douls, you don't drink. But if you drink 20 O'Douls in a half hour, then you're a [bleep]ing non-alcoholic. Non-alcoholism is a problem too. And there are symptoms, like when you fall down, does it always hurt?
- Mitch Hedberg, April 9, 2002
Yeah, I really do have to pick your brain...
Some of this is very counter-intuitive. That doesn’t mean that the math is wrong, but perhaps some things are given more weight than I’m accounting for. I know the Saints played over-all better offenses than the Colts, but the Colts gave up fewer yards and fewer points, so I’m having a hard time figuring out how the Saints are listed 10 spots above the Colts in the unadjusted defensive power rankings. Could you tell me how these were compiled?
If you drink O'Douls, you don't drink. But if you drink 20 O'Douls in a half hour, then you're a [bleep]ing non-alcoholic. Non-alcoholism is a problem too. And there are symptoms, like when you fall down, does it always hurt?
- Mitch Hedberg, April 9, 2002
I'll give you the short version
I’m getting ready to do a long-version explanation, so you’ll have to wait a couple days for it.
The rankings are based on the 16 stats I have in the first table above, which cover almost every aspect of the game. I have to get all the stats to a state where I can compare them against each other, so I baseline them between 0 and 1, with 0.5 being the league average since 2001.
Once I have that, each stat is weighted according to the % Wins they lead to, when both the offense and defense are above average. You can see what those percentages were for 2009 in the first table above. The order of that first table, with respect to the stats, is highest weight → lowest weight. I add all of them together, and get a value. That value doesn’t have much meaning as of right now, other than to compare to other teams. That’s how I get the rankings.
As far as the Colts vs. Saints Defense comparison, check out this from my Super Bowl preview. You can see the Saints led the Colts in 11/16 stats, some of them by quite a large margin (Time of Possession / Drive for example). That’s why the Saints are ranked 10 spots higher than the Colts defensively.
If I could give you one piece of advice, if you want to buy-in to these kind of stats, you have to completely forget any preconceived notion you have heard talked about by the “experts”. Using yards and points are very easy to do, and do an ok job at generalizing the game. I think these kinds of stats (and there are many more like these) tell a much better story about what is happening on the field.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
Thanks, mgrex for all of your work.
The advanced stats have always been the highlight of the week.
What an awful time to have our worst starting position game!
Why the long face, Ryan Miller?















