Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Let's continue to beat the dead horse known as Anthony Gonzalez

This off-season's version of Joseph Addai v. Donald Brown is Anthony Gonzalez v. Pierre Garcon. And, much like what happened last year, the end result will likely be that the team will end up with two good players instead of one good and one "OMG HE SUCKS!" player.

But, since people very much want to debate this subject, I'll throw up another article taking about how (from the information I have) Pierre Garcon is very much the starting WR for the Colts, along with Reggie Wayne. Austin Collie is pretty much locked in at slot receiver, while Dallas Clark will play some slot as well. This means former starter, Anthony Gonzalez, is indeed the team's 4th wide receiver on the depth chart as we head into OTAs.

Star-divide

If you remember, back in March, Jim Caldwell joked about using more 4-wide packages in the offense for 2010. You might also remember that, only a month and a half ago, Anthony Gonzalez was still not healthy; slowly recovering from a knee injury he sustained in Week One against the Jaguars:

"We're in a situation we haven't been in since (2004) when we had three receivers over 1,000 yards, Brandon Stokley, Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne. That was a good group. This group is as talented. As much as we throw the ball, we'll find a place. If they're all healthy and ready to go, we'll find a place. I don't think Gonzalez is quite where he'd like to be, but by the time we get rolling he'll be there.''

Now, before people starting jumping in here again, talking about how my quoting Jim Caldwell is nothing more than me re-stating my "disproved" opinion on Gonzo (rolleyes), I'll just say that I very much want a healthy, happy, and productive Anthony Gonzalez to return to this team in 2010. I am not hoping he is hurt, and thus "proving" my opinion about Garcon as the starter to be correct. My opinion of Garcon is already correct.

Pierre is the starter right now. Anyone who says otherwise simply doesn't know what is going on here.

From everything I've heard, Gonzo is still not 100%. This means the team does not know if he will be ready to run in mini-camp, and there are concerns about his health heading into training camp. Remember, Gonzo's injury was sustained more than eight months ago. He was pretty much week-to-week the whole year, and I believe he had two procedures to try and fix the problem so he could get back on the field. None worked, and he was eventually IRed.

I know that Caldwell's quote suggests the team is optimistic (as they should be), but one of the reasons they don't feel pressured to get Gonzo back out there quickly is because they feel they already have a starter in Garcon. What this tells me is that unless Garcon comes into camp and gets hurt himself, or he simply dogs it and looks horrible, the starting job is his to lose. And in the pecking order of the team, this means Gonzo is WR #4; the primary back-up for both Reggie, Pierre, and Austin.

Now, if we all step back a second and look at the big picture, the canvas presented to us shows this team has probably one of the deepest receiving corps in football. As we all know, when Gonzo is healthy, he's very good. My biggest gripe with him is he tends to get hurt a lot and miss games. Hence, I call him injury prone. If you disagree with that definition, fine. But when he is healthy and running around out there, he is a nightmare to cover. My eyes light up and I get giddy like a sugared-up toddler thinking about the Colts potentially lining up in a a shotgun (empty backfield) with a five WR set utilizing Reggie, Pierre, Austin, Dallas, and Gonzo.

So, instead of having yet another silly "GONZO SUCKS v. PIERRE SUCKS!" debate, let's focus a bit on how a four or five wideout set would benefit the Colts in 2010. The team has invested a lot of picks and money into getting bigger and stronger on the o-line. They also drafted a fullback (or H-Back blocking TE) in Brody Eldridge. This suggests more "power running." However, a five wideout look sounds pretty damn scary to me.

Who would they use this look against? My first thought was "everyone in the division." The Titans, Texans, and Jaguars all have bad secondaries. Do you throw a five wideout look at the Patriots? Do you attack the Chargers with this look? A five wideout package would sure screw-up a team that loves to run 3-4 defense, wouldn't it?

Discuss.

Comment 75 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good Call

and I don’t think its a dead horse if everyone and their dog wants to debate it. This is very much the Reggie vs. Andre debate we had going in the season last year. Production and efficiency vs. Physical tools.

I agree that Pierre is the number 2 guy going into camps, but if Gonzo is healthy and 100%, I believe he WILL beat out Pierre and reclaim his rightful place at the top of the Colts depth chart.

insert signature here

by JustAJ on May 12, 2010 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Not to mention Gonzo beat out Garcon last year, and Garcon had the same skill and physical tools he did then.

Still, it will be interesting to see how they both are utilized to maximize the impact of Garcon’s size despite his lack of ball handling, while utilizing Gonzo’s great catching ability, great route running, and good separation. We are going to have a very very nice group of receivers next year. i’d like to see a 4 wide set more often with Clark and Collie on the right and Gonzo, Garcon, and Wayne in a cluster on the left.

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Collie

Collie beat out Garcon last year in camp. both were competing for slot receiver spot.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

As I remember it the team stated early on that Collie was practicing as a slot receiver only, while Garcon was practicing in the wide out position only.

Anyone who has a problem with Joseph should stop watching Colts football. It's unfair to expect a back to replace Edge, and Addai has been excellent in all areas when he is healthy.

by DontHateAddai on May 12, 2010 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
Just how deeply can your senses be wrong? With some VR goggles, a camera and a touch on the back researchers were able to overcome a person's sense of being inside their own body.

by shake n bake on May 12, 2010 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Yep.

------

"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

Roger Ebert, Transformers review.

by E.M.H. on May 12, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, now this is more even headed of you.

You finally posted something that actually reflects the reality of the situation. Garcon probably has a lead on Gonzo because Gonzo is coming off an injury! Thank you! For once you didn’t put something like “Garcon has developed faster,” or “Garcon is the better receiver,” or “Gonzo is injury prone and a bust,” you actually stuck to reality and finally said it like it is. Gonzo is injured, or coming off an injury. There will be a battle, and thank god for that. I’m glad you started listening to other people BBS. Thank you for finally correcting your mistakes.

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

LOL

It’s actually, pretty much, the exact same thing I’ve posted before. I still think Garcon is a better receiver right now, and I don’t think it will be much of a battle. Garcon will start, barring something newsworthy happening at camp. However, a big element of this whole equation is Gonzo’s health.

Also, I don’t think I ever wrote that Gonzo was a “bust.” Injury prone, yes. But a bust? If I did, can somebody find the quote for me. Maybe I was drinking.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also

I appreciate the nice words, Jamkel. And I always listen to what people tell me.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dude

Just make a fanpost in response next time lol

Our heads may be bloody, but they are unbowed. We will be back next year better than ever!
Indianapolis Colts News and Updates

by coltsfan723 on May 12, 2010 1:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

He already has a FP up on this

http://www.stampedeblue.com/2010/5/7/1461826/a-gonzalez-v-2-receiver-the

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

But do you understand BBS?

Do you actually understand why you’ve gotten such a negative reaction? Do you understand that people haven’t read your posts as “Gonzo is injured so he is 4th on the depth chart,” because you’ve never actually said that? Do you understand that you may have been a little sloppy with your wording and your use of numbers? I know I’m just repeating myself, but if you don’t get the reason 5 or 6 of us have been repeating ourselves for the past 2 weeks, then you don’t actually understand our position. If you are learning from our counter-arguments then we’d actually like to see the improvement of your position, and we weren’t getting that in any of your previous posts, you seemed to just be circling around the same argument but phrasing it in a different way each time without ever really getting why you were being trashed so much.

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ya, about halfway through I thought of just copying over to a fan post...

But why do it the easy way? lol

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jamkel Im with you on this.

 Not to say a bad word about BBS. I love his work. But, I do disagree with the notion Gonzo when healthy is #4. I agree as well, that in the here and now, Pierre is #2. I’ll go 1 step further and suggest, we will be better off with Garcon out wide and a healthy Gonzo starting in the slot. Now, in all reality, Gonzo is the #2 WR on our roster. But, Gonzo is a better fit in the slot then on the outside. Garcon is faster, Gonzo is much quicker. So, we can put Gonzo back in the slot and Garcon on the outside. Garcon can help open Gonzo in the slot and vice versa. I would sleep better at night if Gonzo started in the slot. Dallas and Gonzo in the middle of the field = not even fair to the opposing defense.

If Russia attacked Turkey from the rear, Do you think Greece would help?

by whardiek on May 12, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Monstersbox......is that you?

Good post.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Finals suck.

by Cassieper on May 12, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

This needs to turn green.

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on May 12, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the response

But, again, it’s not all about the injury. If what I know holds firm, even when Gonzo is healthy, Garcon will still start. The Colts themselves do not agree with you. They do not think that Gonzo is “better,” and they would likely cite some of the same things I have (Garcon’s YAC, his excellent play in the playoffs, his strength, speed, durability, etc.).

But, again, we are getting back to Gonzo v. Garcon, which is not what this is about. This is about Gonzo AND Garcon. I have yet to see you comment about a 5-WR set.

Also, if Gonzo is indeed sat on the bench despite being healthy, will that upset you?

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d be interested in knowing who from the Colts themselves has given any direct indication that Garcon is better than Gonzalez. Besides the fact that a decision hasn’t been made, that’s a very un-PC (in football terms) thing to say, even off the record.

I think he could be. But remember, his catch rate was still very low, his penalties very high, etc. There are plenty of statistics (Shake has cited them) that point very decisively towards Gonzalez.

Anyway, to answer your last question, no, it wouldn’t upset me. If Garcon earns it, that’s a good thing.

Cookie Cookie Cookie starts with C!

by willyduer on May 12, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

No it won't, because he won't be sat on the bench for any of the reasons you had listed in your articles before.

I fully expect for Gonzo to take a backseat to Garcon at the start of the season simply because Gonzo has been out of the loop for the past year. Even healthy if he doesn’t have the timing back with Manning 100%, then that will translate into poorer performance. I do expect Gonzo to get the starting position back by about the 4th regular season game or so, but I don’t think Garcon is never going to see a snap again. He has shown alot of ability and Manning will find a use for him, and will probably get atleast 500 yards next year, even if he becomes a backup (although knowing Manning it’ll probably be more in the 800-1,000 range for both Gonzo and Garcon regardless).

So no, I won’t be upset if Gonzo is sitting, but I have to ask if you’d be upset if Garcon was the one sitting? There have actually been 4 or 5 different threads where I’ve said this whole debate is silly, because when push comes to shove its all speculation and we won’t know anything for sure until Training Camp starts. I’ve also said a number of times that regardless of how everything turns out, we are stacked at receivers and that having Wayne/Collie/Gonzo/Garcon/Clark all on the field would make us unstoppable. Maybe you didn’t see them, but I do tend to comment alot so it wouldn’t surprise me if you missed the one or two.

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me personally

I just want the best receiver out there, whoever he is.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we can all agree on that.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Finals suck.

by Cassieper on May 12, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Word

But I still think that our better WR is not Garçon

by trOOly on May 12, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Blair White!

oh fine… i’ll leave.

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on May 12, 2010 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Better? No way

Starter? Well yeah, sure. Though in May there’s hardly an official label on anything.

When/if Gonzo is proven healthy, then it’s worth debating who’s better/starting. In that case I think you’ll see Gonzalez getting most of the snaps, but Garcon still seeing plenty of action.

I just worry that if everyone’s healthy we’ll eventually have an unhappy receiver on our hands that’ll end up demanding a trade or something.

Meh. Good problem to have.

Cookie Cookie Cookie starts with C!

by willyduer on May 12, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's why this training camp will be so interesting.

Instead of getting crazy about the staff’s decision to make CJ the starter of Ugoh like last year, we can get crazy about the staff’s decision to make either our big, strong, fast man beast WR or the shifty, precise route runner WR with great hands the starter.

EVH+DLR=BFFs........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on May 12, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Garcon

is a beast when he gets the ball in his hands. there is no other reciever on our team who can take on tacklers and make people miss like him. he also has sick deep threat ability. i would like to see the colts use gonzo along with garcon in order to both keep gonzo healthy and give garcon a breather after sprinting down field and taking on tacklers.

by FreeneyWillEatYourBaby on May 12, 2010 12:47 PM EDT reply actions  

If 5 wide...

…you mean Wayne, Garcon, Collie, Gonzo and Clark…

Yikes.

Bodden vs Wayne – Wayne
McCourty/Wilhite vs Garcon – Draw
Butler vs Collie – Draw, leaning towards Collie
Springs vs Gonzo – Springs
McGowan vs Clark – McGowan

I still call that a 270 yard, 2 TD, 1 INT game.

by Richard Hill on May 12, 2010 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Seriously?

Shawn Springs on Collie? A rookie on Garcon? You better hope your line gets pressure.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW,

did you get the screenshots I sent yesterday? I never got anything back.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Finals suck.

by Cassieper on May 12, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I did

Working on it.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK.

Just checking.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Finals suck.

by Cassieper on May 12, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love these 'behind the scenes' peeks!

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on May 12, 2010 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Finals suck.

by Cassieper on May 12, 2010 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

You underestimate Clark.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Finals suck.

by Cassieper on May 12, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

C'mon!

McGowan isn’t going to beat Clark!!

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on May 12, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Two ways to stop Clark

neither involve single coverage.

Bracket coverage with a S and LB, which is what the Pats do to him a lot from what I’ve seen, or get so much pressure that the Colts have to hold him in to block, the Ravens have had success against him that way.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
Just how deeply can your senses be wrong? With some VR goggles, a camera and a touch on the back researchers were able to overcome a person's sense of being inside their own body.

by shake n bake on May 12, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

that is good for the Colts though

double covering a TE??? Frees up the WR’s.

"Pressure is something you feel when you don't know what the hell you're doing."
-Peyton Manning

by ZayJack on May 12, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Pats are smart enough to play bracket on Clark

and still play two-deep man with the rest. The mix zones and mans more than pretty much every team. If that happens, the Colts will have to rely on the 2nd and 3rd receivers, whoever they may be. Last year, those guys stepped up in the fourth quarter.

EVH+DLR=BFFs........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on May 12, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're really gonna go with Mcgowan over Clark?

Anyone who has a problem with Joseph should stop watching Colts football. It's unfair to expect a back to replace Edge, and Addai has been excellent in all areas when he is healthy.

by DontHateAddai on May 12, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

(shakes head)

Pats’ fan. What can ya do? He’s nice enough…(whispers) just a little, you know, not all there.
lol

"I throw, you catch. It's NOT that hard!"
Peyton Manning, SNL, 2007

by peytonsthebest on May 12, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

ZING!

Careful what you wish for... a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have.

by teej813 on May 12, 2010 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually...

…I would put Chung on Clark. Chung/McGowan did a good job of keeping Clark out of the passing game- his big yards came against our ILB Gary Guyton.

And yes, I would put a ballhawk in McCourty against a bobbler in Garcon.
I would trust a wily veteran in Springs against a possibly slowed down Gonzo. I think that may be more of a draw.

Actually, looking at the actual numbers, I think that all of the match-ups would be draws, except for the Wayne over Bodden.

Call it a 320 yard, 3 TD and 1 INT game.

by Richard Hill on May 12, 2010 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

also

McGowan cant handle Clark by himself

"I'm pretty sure my cats been reading my diary"

by skywalker on May 13, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also, need info on this

I don’t listen to much Indy Sports Radio, but people are telling me Colts fans keep calling into radio shows talking about how the Colts should trade Gonzo. Is that true?

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 1:15 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't listen to much radio either.

"I am in favor of censorship ‐ not against what is supposed to be sexy or dirty, but against what is idiotic." -Jean Renoir

Random fact of the week from the empty void that is my mind: Finals suck.

by Cassieper on May 12, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

if it is, they are dumb

trading Gonzo is really selling low.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
Just how deeply can your senses be wrong? With some VR goggles, a camera and a touch on the back researchers were able to overcome a person's sense of being inside their own body.

by shake n bake on May 12, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Besides, how often do we actually trade anyone?

Especially anyone we spent a first rounder on. We cut them and draft someone new well before we actually trade. I may have a short memory, but I could have sworn our only significant personnel trade in the past half dozen seasons was for McFarland.

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

there was the attempted McCargo trade

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
Just how deeply can your senses be wrong? With some VR goggles, a camera and a touch on the back researchers were able to overcome a person's sense of being inside their own body.

by shake n bake on May 12, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Forgot about that. Still 2 trades is quite a small amount for a franchise isn't it?

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

they traded Lawton to the Eagles for a conditional pick

which amounted to nothing since he didn’t make the roster.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
Just how deeply can your senses be wrong? With some VR goggles, a camera and a touch on the back researchers were able to overcome a person's sense of being inside their own body.

by shake n bake on May 12, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't listen to Indy Sports radio

since I’m in Tennessee, but if it’s true; those fans do not know squat about football. Wouldn’t it be really hard to trade Gonzo if his knee is really messed up, but more important; why would the Colts trade Gonzalez if he does eventually returns to 80% or more? Idiots…

"Al Davis said it best, just win baby win" ~ Snoop on "All I Do is Win"

by KMR24 on May 12, 2010 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Five Wide

I think we’ll certainly see it some time this year, but it makes Peyton very vulnerable to any kind of good pass rush and doesn’t really provide too much of an advantage over the usual sets.

To me, it’s not an issue of whether the opposing team has a weak secondary – no team’s secondary is good enough to cover those 5 (or any group of 5, really) over a very long time. That’s just the nature of the offense’s built in advantage.

To me the usefulness is more about what kind of pass rushers they have. If they’ve got guys like Allen or Freeney who can beat anyone straight up any time, the 5 wide wouldn’t help.

I just wonder what kind of advantage it’d even give us. It’s not as if keeping Addai in the backfield eliminates a receiving threat. He’s often able to get wide open with some space around him after contributing a useful block first. That little safety valve is always very nice to have. With 5 wide, you lose that block, plus there’s probably still going to be a route run that is short / safety valve-esque, so it’s really not that big of a deal.

I guess where I see the value is that you can really start to manipulate the defense, and thus run routes that almost guarantee that you’ve got one guy getting single coverage in whatever area of the field you want. If you know for sure he can outrun his guy, you can just lob it up there and not worry about a safety coming over. Or you can set it up so that Garcon gets some space to run after a catch without too much danger of getting hit hard… big chance for a long run. Stuff like that is interesting. But again, I still wonder how different that is from the norm. If Addai comes off the field, they just swap a DB for the LB spying on him.

Where I think this would really benefit us would be if Peyton could run a bit. Then they’d be in a dime defense with nothing up front really, and if there was still a running threat, they’d be really vulnerable to it.

Cookie Cookie Cookie starts with C!

by willyduer on May 12, 2010 1:29 PM EDT reply actions  

plus when using Addai out wide in a 5WR set he actually becomes a big play threat

one of the rare occasions we get to see that 4.4 speed.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
Just how deeply can your senses be wrong? With some VR goggles, a camera and a touch on the back researchers were able to overcome a person's sense of being inside their own body.

by shake n bake on May 12, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ya, I think alot of it just does come down to the pass rushers. If our Oline can handle them

Then using Addai or Clark as our 5th receiver has some serious advantages, but if we have any real doubts about the strength of our front line, then we will probably have to keep clark or addai in to help block.

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually

They could always still go 4 wide with Clark lined up at actual tight end. So there’d be available blocking help if necessary, but he’d still be free to get into a route.

Same idea as with Addai chipping and sneaking into the flat or in front of the LBs as usual, but with a more dynamic receiver. Depending on the transparency of the D they’d probably decide at the line whether he should stay or release immediately.

Cookie Cookie Cookie starts with C!

by willyduer on May 12, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he can still run a 4.4 I’d eat my bedspread.

That said, does anyone still have tape of the super bowl? They ran several plays with Addai split wide. That’d be an interesting little tape analysis to run – how successful were those plays; what kind of routes did they run; how did the Saint D respond; etc?

BTW if we ended up getting a tape geek here who really really knows his stuff (like beyond anything even I know) and wrote articles with screencaps etc, not only would that be an amazing teaching tool, but it’d instantly make this one of the best sites on the web.

Stuff like that one Browns site post analyzing the Porter INT, where he went into great depth explaining the route tree, the timing, inside vs outside position, etc. Basically all the stuff the average fan doesn’t know about… kind of like when FO does their weekly examples of three plays.

Cookie Cookie Cookie starts with C!

by willyduer on May 12, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was a first round pick. Trade.

Lets trade him to the Raiders for Nnamdi Asomugha and a second round pick.

We made it to the Superbowl without him. Hank Basket couldn’t even get on the field with Gonzalez out for the year.

by BlueLagoon_18 on May 12, 2010 1:41 PM EDT reply actions  

even crazy old Al wouldn't take that trade

and Asomugha is getting Manning type money right now. I know there’s no cap, but it could come back and the Colts still have a budget.

Not to mention that WR is one of the positions where the Raiders have decent enough talent.

Luck is probability taken personally, clutch is probability attributed to individuals.
Just how deeply can your senses be wrong? With some VR goggles, a camera and a touch on the back researchers were able to overcome a person's sense of being inside their own body.

by shake n bake on May 12, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Raiders would love Gonzo, but not for Nnamdi.

Nnamdi is first way too expensive for a team like a Colts. And it is still not a fair trade for Oakland. Nnamdi is much more valuable than at best the second best receiver on a team with 4 good receivers.

EVH+DLR=BFFs........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on May 12, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't want to touch Asomugha's contract though...

Not even in an uncapped year. Even still, we got to our first SB with Sanders and our second without. Just happenstance does not equal causality.

"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."

-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)

by Jamkel on May 12, 2010 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bad News, BBS

The uber-brilliant Matt Williamson of the more uber-brilliant Scouts Inc. over at ESPN agrees with you that Garcon should start. That is probably the biggest signal that Gonzo will start. He is NEVER right.

In reality, I just want the better player out there. In my opinion, Gonzo is the better player, but if Garcon proves himself to be that, then start him. Training Camp will do this anyway.

EVH+DLR=BFFs........ God I Hope So!!

by dmstorm22 on May 12, 2010 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Ugh

I just barfed in my mouth a little bit.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on May 12, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Scouts, Inc is hilarious

They act like experts but they are, top to bottom, basically worthless.

I was thinking I’d open up a business and call it “Jai Alai Statistical Experts, Inc” – I’m almost as qualified.

Cookie Cookie Cookie starts with C!

by willyduer on May 12, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are way too funny...

and not a bad idea… most people don’t check credentials … got enough BS going you may just get a BIG contract from someone.. LOL

by Manning4ever on May 12, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Pierre is the starter right now. Anyone who says otherwise simply doesn't know what is going on here"

Except for the fact that no one is listed as a starter. Anyone who disagrees simply doesn’t know what he is talking about.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on May 12, 2010 3:03 PM EDT reply actions  

I said it already in my own fanpost...

But in this article I will side with BBS.

Marvin Harrison came back off a serious injury and started, only because of who he was, not because of any other reason.

For example, Roy Hall was very talented, very gifted, but couldn’t stay healthy. He was not going to start over Marvin Harrison, even an over the hill Marvin Harrison.

People point out how Garcon was beaten out by Collie in the preseason as the Slot WR. What people I think often overlook is that Garcon is more of an outside WR. Yes, as a WR you should be versatile and capable of playing any position on the line. However, some players are trained/built if you will with certain modes in their game.

Randy Moss can line up in the slot, but he rarely ever does. Why? He’s a burner, not an across the middle kind of guy. Moss is a deep threat, not a possession WR.

I’m basing my comments with regards to this post on my viewing sample of the WRs on the field. Am I wrong? I could be. However, this is what I think. Collie and Gonzo while fast WR’s, are more possession WR’s than down field threats. They certainly can break for hellacious yards after the catch, as evidenced by games both players have had.

However, Garcon is the one wildcard in that he can break deep at a moments notice. Is he still raw? Absolutely. The kid came from a Division III school and could not compare to the level of training/programs that both Collie and Gonzo came from. Collie coming from a pass happy school, and Gonzo coming from a very efficient West Coast style offense.

Ultimately, I’d much rather see Gonzo in the slot as I feel he offers the best mismatch on the field, even better than Clark depending on who we play. Also, with Gonzo possibly sidelined when the season begins, how do you decide when to play him? What happens if the Colts go 12-1 and Collie/Garcon are playing lights out?

Gonzo is a great player, a fantastic teammate, and a player I want on the field. However, the only person I can see getting knocked off the field as a starter would be Collie. Garcon’s position is secure as long as he performs as good as he did last year.

by DevilsReject on May 12, 2010 4:15 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

"This means former starter, Anthony Gonzalez, is indeed the team's 4th wide receiver on the depth chart as we head into OTAs."

Yeah?

Hm, the only official depth chart is completely blank. Did you get a depth chart via special super secret blogger-only press release? How often does a starter on our team lose his starting job to injury? I don’t recall. Is there some other way by which you stumbled upon this information?

Anonymity breeds inhumanity. In simpler terms, don't be a troll.

by linkish on May 12, 2010 4:28 PM EDT reply actions  

No way

will we see 5 WR sets. We’re going to run the ball a whole hell of a lot more then us Colts fans are used to seeing this year.

by gteare28 on May 13, 2010 9:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Not sold on that

This is still a QB driven league, with pass happy teams that have an efficient running game winning. Our red zone running was pretty much the middle of the pack throughout the year, our carries per game was low. And with the replacement of Pollak with DeVan, continuity was finally established and that was also why we started to run better in the playoffs.

I am a believer in the second year philosophy – second year for CJ at LT to improve his next level run blocking (he is already a good pass blocker and last year was his first complete year with reps at LT and playing time at LT), second year for Donald Brown at RB, second year for Kyle DeVan at RG, and we could make a case for second year for Mike Hart at RB too.

So, all of the above should result in an improved running game, IMO – the continuity is a big plus.

However, even the best of LTs need RB or TE chipping help against elite pass rushers. So, Brody Eldridge is not only going to be used for running play help but also for pass protection. This will also free up Addai to catch more passes or our other RBs as well.

The Colts rarely use 4 wideout formations, let alone 5. I expect 4 wideout formations (3 WR, 1 TE or 2 WR, 2 TE) mostly from the Colts. There may be some plays with 4 WRs and 1 TE but those will be few and far between, it would not be a good idea to go empty backfield with the best blocking RB, hence 4 wideouts at best.

by chad72 on May 13, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

To qualify...

…it should read “The Colts rarely use 4 WR formations, let alone 5”.

by chad72 on May 13, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Polian isn’t making significant changes to the O-line just for kicks and giggles. He’s planning on a stronger run game. I have no doubt that Manning will still be throwing the ball like mad. But we will likely see more of a ground game than what WE are used to or have seen for several years.

by the_iowa_hawkeye on May 13, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I don't know about that so much.

Every time it’s been discussed, it’s in the context of picking up the short yards that we need, when we need them. I guess that can be translated as a stronger running game, but I don’t think we’ll be a team with set running downs. Kind of in a “throw the ball first, run when you need to” way.

Of course, I could have misconstrued how you meant that.

Anonymity breeds inhumanity. In simpler terms, don't be a troll.

by linkish on May 13, 2010 5:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake