Jim Caldwell at one time did not think highly of the Colts defensive tackles
Comcast has generously agreed to support the best NFL community around -- us! As part of that effort, between now and the end of the 2010 NFL season Comcast will be sponsoring a variety of special editorial and interactive features on our site. They begin today with the launch of the Comcast HD War Room, your weekly destination for key draft insight and opinion.
It's always interesting when you get a sliver of truth in an article intended to be a fluff piece. Here's Jim Caldwell talking about the Colts defensive tackles in an article by John Oehser for Colts.com:
"There was a time where we just felt, 'Maybe we just weren't as stout in the middle as we should have been,' Caldwell said. "They did give us that punch and they gave us a little more bulk in there, but we didn't lose any of the mobility we've always had in terms of speed, shake and explosiveness."
This statement is not exactly a ringing endorsement of Keyunta Dawson, Raheem Brock, and Eric Foster. All three played significant snaps at defensive tackle in 2008, along with LaJuan Ramsey and Ed Johnson. Of the five players listed here, only Foster is still on the team as a defensive tackle, and he no longer starts as he did in 2008, when the Colts surrendered 1,966 rushing yards and 18 rushing TDs. Last year, both Brock and Dawson were switched to defensive end. Ramsey was cut, as was Ed Johnson (again).
Entering 2009, Caldwell seems much more comfortable with his tackles, in particular Daniel Muir. Muir was signed in 2008, but played sparingly. In 2009, he really developed into a fairly good tackle.
"Dan Muir is a guy who just keeps getting better," Caldwell said. "There was one ball game (last season) where he had as many tackles as an interior linemen we've had in a number of years. Not only that he can rush the passer."
Another key to the defensive tackle rotation in 2010 is Fili Moala, who we've talked about at length of late. Moala has had a productive off-season. It will be interesting to see if he can push Foster for more playing time.
Another possible key to the d-line is Mitch King. I realize some folks around here might be wondering why writers like me and Joe (shake n bake) Baker are so high on King. The reason is we see big potential in him, as does Coach Caldwell:
"He has natural leverage. He’s got strength. He’s tenacious. We’re looking forward to getting him out on the field to see exactly what he can do once we get things really going. But he is learning the system, getting a good sense of things, and we’ll see how he progresses. He looks good at this point."
I also like King because he brings some interior rush speed to the DT spot. The Colts haven't had speed like that since Raheem Brock circa 2006.
Comcast is a proud supporter of Stampede Blue. You’ll get your Indianapolis Colts games as a part of over 120 NFL games Comcast provides in HD, as well as On Demand game recaps from every NFL game every week, faster Internet speeds, and stunning HD. With Comcast and NFL RedZone, you get every touchdown from every game every Sunday afternoon! Call 1-800-COMCAST or visit http://www.comcast.com.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wasn't happy with those tackles of 2008 either
Brock I was ok with, but Dawson and Foster I thought were a complete joke. Foster has since impressed me as a situational pass rushing UT, when he has a litigate DT next to him. Dawson, I believe his time as an NFL player is limited, he is not athletic enough to play DE and not big enough to play DT, he is a “tweener” the fact that he has lasted this long says a lot about his intensity and work ethic, but he is not athletic enough to be a NFL player, his career stats of 9 pressures and one sack are hardly impressive.
King I’m not sold on, he was an UDFA last year and probably had the chance to sign with team last year, but opted to sign Tenn. The reasoning is that if B. Polian liked him enough to sign him this year then he probably tried to sign him last year. He didn’t make it with Tenn. now he’s desperate and trying to catch on with the Colts. I realize king has a lot of potential, but all of the young DT prospects have potential.
I believe that the competition in camp will be a lot of fun to keep an eye, and who ever comes out of camp on the roster will make the Colts better. Moala will end up being the 4th DT with King or Mathews on the practice squad.
Defense is more important than breathing.
King
I’m with BBS and Shake on King. I was really hoping he’d be a late-round pick for the Colts two years ago. He was a major force at Iowa, both on the field and in the locker room. I think we’re all excited about him being on the Colts because we know it’s a good match. Player’s from Kirk Ferentz’s system usually do well in Indy because of the similiarities. Personally, I think it’s Matthews on the outside looking in because King’s got more experience both in the NFL and in the NCAA.
I also think Moala ends up at the 3rd DT by the end of the season. From what I’ve read and watched, the guy has flipped a switch in his head and he has the physical tools to beat out Foster.
by 2ndBlueGeneration on Jun 22, 2010 3:19 PM EDT reply actions
Another catylist for King is Angerer
King thrives on a certain kind of energy – the kind of energy that guys like Angerer bring. Those two were amazing when on the field together in 2008. I can only imagine what they would be like with King on the line, Angerer behind him, and Sanders behind both of them.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on Jun 22, 2010 6:34 PM EDT reply actions
"Jim Caldwell at one time did not think highly of the Colts defensive tackles"?? Join the club!
Oh, wait… he wasn’t referring to the 2006 regular season? 
------
"How can a pickup truck contain enough mass to unfold into a towering machine? I say if Ringling Brothers can get 15 clowns into a Volkswagen, anything is possible."

by 













