Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Don't make Colts rookie linebacker Pat Angerer angry... you wouldn't like him when he's angry

Comcast has generously agreed to support the best NFL community around -- us!  As part of that effort, between now and the end of the 2010 NFL season Comcast will be sponsoring a variety of special editorial and interactive features on our site.  They begin today with the launch of the Comcast HD War Room, your weekly destination for key draft insight and opinion.

With the recent news that Ed Norton will not reprise his role as Dr. Bruce Banner (aka, The Incredible Hulk) in the upcoming Avengers movie, I thought we'd spend some time chatting about another guy who turns superhuman when he gets pissed: Pat Angerer.

I know from a good "source" that Joe "shake n bake" Baker is very excited the Colts drafted Pat Angerer. Of course, I was the schmuck who said he was a "reach pick" back in April, and I still feel that way. However, despite that, it's not like Pat can help what pick Bill Polian chooses to take him at. And it's not like Pat projects as the second-coming of Gilbert Gardner, or anything. Like Joe, I'm happy the Colts have added another fast, explosive defensive player from the farm system that continues to provide Indy with great talent: The University of Iowa.

Angerer's position coach at Iowa last season was Darrell Wilson. In 1999, Wilson was an assistant coach at Rutgers University where he saw, up close, a 19-year-old walk-on named Gary Brackett. In 2010, Angerer will be Brackett's primary back-up at middle linebacker. As Bill Polian said on Day Two of the 2010 NFL Draft:

"They're very similar players," he said. "If you like the way Gary plays you'll like the way Pat plays."

Other talent evaluators had some pretty positive things to say about Angerer. But, what can he bring to the Colts in 2010? Why was he drafted at a spot where the Colts could have very easily gotten a starter at another position of need, like Charles Brown of USC? Will Angerer be able to contribute to a team looking to go back to a second straight Super Bowl?

Star-divide

Angrypatangerer_medium

Gary Brackett seems to fit the mold of what a Colts Tampa-2 middle linebacker should be. Since he took over the starting MIKE duties from one-time starter Rob Morris in 2005, the Colts defense has transformed from a once laughable collection of cast-offs to a feared unit of gale force dynamos capable of shutting down any offense.

OK, any offense except the Wild Cat. They have problems with the Wild Cat. I'll concede that.

But, Wild Cat aside, when the Colts faced three of the top rushing offenses in football during the playoffs last year (Ravens, Jets, and Saints), Indy shut them down and Gary Brackett was a big part of that.

Flash back to late-November 2008, when Gary was carted off the field with a broken leg. Having fought through that whole year, dealing with multiple injuries to several key players, for the Colts to lose Brackett at that time was pretty devastating. His absence was mostly felt in the playoff game against the Chargers, where Darren Sproles had a monster game running for 105 yards and 2 TDs while tight end Antonio Gates had 8 catches for 87 yards, including several key third down conversations in overtime.  

I think the lose of Brackett for the month of December in 2008 and the subsequent playoff game did not sit well with Bill Polian. It's probably one of the reasons why he was so steadfast in defending the decisions surrounding Week Sixteen last year. In 2010, Polian probably did not want to see a repeat of what a Colts defense would look like sans a Brackett-type linebacker.

Thus, Pat Angerer was drafted in Round Two.

Obviously, the follow-up question many have asked in light of the Angerer selection is "Does this mean the Colts don't think Brackett has much of a future in Indy?" It's a logical question, but considering the Colts just invested a five-year, $33 million dollar contract in Gary, I'd say that puts that question to bed.

Having answered that, the question now swings back around to Angerer: Why draft a guy in the second round who will be a back-up in 2010, and possibly beyond that? Second round picks are high level picks, and typically those kinds of guys should be starting soon after their selection. I mean, if a 4th 3rd round corner like Jerraud Powers is starting his rookies year, or 6th round safety like Antoine Bethea in 2006, stands to reason a second rounder should at least be on par with that.

In Angerer's case, I think this is just an example of the Colts valuing his "stock" higher than, say, Charles Brown of USC. Brown is a talented player and he fills a position of need for the Colts. However, on the Colts draft board, they likely rated Angerer higher. So, when their pick in Round Two came up, they simply took Angerer regardless of what position he played. This type of strategy has been very beneficial for the Colts in years past. Why deviate?

For me, the progress of Angerer and Brown will always be compared, fair or unfair. If Brown goes on to being a good left tackle for the Saints, then that's a dent in the Polian philosophy for the draft, especially if inconsistent offensive line play prevents the Colts from winning the Super Bowl this season.

Regardless of how it shakes out, Angerer is a Colt, and he's exactly the kind of guy the Colts love to develop and mold into professional football players. One day, he will likely replace Gary Brackett or Clint Session. I don't think he's big enough to play SAM. Until then, Angerer will need to make his mark as a special teams player, which was where players like Brackett, Session, June, and Keiaho all made their marks prior to them moving into the starting line-up as linebackers.


Comcast is a proud supporter of Stampede Blue. You’ll get your Indianapolis Colts games as a part of over 120 NFL games Comcast provides in HD, as well as On Demand game recaps from every NFL game every week, faster Internet speeds, and stunning HD. With Comcast and NFL RedZone, you get every touchdown from every game every Sunday afternoon! Call 1-800-COMCAST or visit http://www.comcast.com.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ah, cmon BBS!

Where’s the juicy stories about Angerer when he looses his temper? I’m talking to my lawyer about false advertising. He says I will own this site when he’s done with you. (Laughing at my brilliant attempt at humor.)

by tim55 on Jul 16, 2010 11:14 AM EDT reply actions  

I read somewhere that Mark Ruffalo will play Hulk

Fine with me.
About Angerer, I thought he did something, like slap one of those schmucks who call themselves “journalists”.

"We’re only going to score 17 points? haha...OK" - Tom Brady
Last piece of Colts merch added to my collection: Riddell Authentic Revolution Helmet!.

by BlueMark1821 on Jul 16, 2010 12:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Powers was a 3rd round pick

Angerer’s a cool name, anyone remember how he did in that awesome names tournament?

by Bacalao on Jul 16, 2010 12:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I think he made it to the semis

and then people started voting against him, because people of BHGP basically got him that far, and others didn’t think that was fair, or something.

Tigers love pepper... they hate cinnamon.

by White Lightning on Jul 16, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Mike

IMHO, besides QB, the Mike is the only position that we don’t have a decent backup. Nothing against Painter, but if we lose QB1 the season is lost. We can survive just about every other injury. If Clark goes down, Tamme and Santi can fill in and we have other weapons at WR to take up the slack.

But if Gary goes down… ugh, I don’t want to think about that SD game… Hopefully the Angry Man will prove to be a decent backup.

by smonroe on Jul 16, 2010 12:31 PM EDT reply actions  

True, but...

“IMHO, besides QB, the Mike is the only position that we don’t have a decent backup. Nothing against Painter, but if we lose QB1 the season is lost”

While I don’t always agree with Paul Kuharsky, one point he’s made repeatedly that I do think is very valid: ALL teams are in serious jeopardy for the season if they lose their #1 player…particularly if that #1 player is a QB…and particularly if that #1 player and QB happens to be so other worldly that he’s been singled out as the most valuable player in the entire league no fewer than four times! In other words, yeah, we’d be lucky to pull off even 4-5 wins per season if forced to go Peyton-less…but nearly EVERY team would be in similarly dire straits if they lost their best player. Personally, I don’t think there’s ANYONE who can run that offense anywhere near as effectively as Peyton can. I’m fine with Polian et al. just implicitly acknowledging that the team is screwed without Peyton anyway, so rather than spending more money on a Bulger-like backup (who might win 2-4 more games than Painter but still, IMO, wouldn’t lead us to the playoffs), they’d rather invest that money on filling other positions of need.

And, wow, this was a lot longer and more rambling than I’d intended, but hopefully you get the point! By the way, I wholeheartedly agree that Angerer is one of the best last names for a football player EVER.

by racf617 on Jul 16, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are quite a number of teams that have decent backup QB....

and more than often 1~2 games decide whether you can go to the playoffs or not.

If you see my smilieys, think of E.M.H. - our COLTs King of Smileys!

by Manning4ever on Jul 16, 2010 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

We have serciveable left tackles

We have no backup at Brackett’s position. The depth at linebacker needed to be addresses. We have other options at tackle, there was little at linebacker, which i think explains the pick even if it does seem a reach.

remember ‘in polian we trust..’ (and he sucks at picking Oline anyways, so this might have been a safer pick)

An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing...

by bluegirl on Jul 16, 2010 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a matter of who was left

In a class very thin with MLB quality picks, two players that would have fit the Colts system – Daryl Washington of TCU and Sean Lee of Penn State were both off the board. Based on who was available for the position of need, closest to where they expected him to go, Pat Angerer fit the bill.

In other drafts where MLB depth may have been better, he may have been there at the end of the 3rd but chances were, he was not going to be so in this draft.

Plus, having done effectively well enough with lower round O-linemen, and knowing well how BP’s OL picks have turned out, I feel this might end up being a better pick for us down the road.

To be honest, Polian makes his living with his first round picks and later round gems like Mathis, Bethea and UDFA finds like Brackett, Rhodes, Saturday, Lacey etc.

Polian’s drafting in rounds 2 and 3 have always left much to be desired throughout his tenure. He has not had a single Pro-Bowl DT from his drafts, just one Pro Bowl LB (no, not Brackett, it was Cato June, I think), and outside Saturday, no other OL that made the Pro Bowl consistently (Glenn was not drafted by Polian).

by chad72 on Jul 16, 2010 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Though one game does not define an LB...

…I did see him have a chance to get a safety by tackling Jonathan Dwyer of Georgia Tech. in the Orange Bowl in the end zone, and Pat Angerer whiffed on it. That is the image I have of him, whiffing on a big RB, he plays like Gary Brackett in his early days, alright. I will give you that :-).

Gary Brackett and any of the Colts’ LBs effectiveness is reduced without good DTs in the middle that would allow them to make plays, and Angerer is no different. Let us not forget that Big Ed and Mookie were together in the Dolphins wildcat game, not Mookie and Muir who now give us the best tandem we have had in a while at the DT position.

In other words, I personally do not see anything special in Angerer except being able to make plays in pass coverage like GB down the road. Maybe he is quicker than GB as a blitzer during blitzes, GB looks like a turtle on a blitz play as a blitzer sometimes.

by chad72 on Jul 16, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

about half Iowa's D whiffed on Dwyer on that play

including the embodiment of awesome, Adrian Clayborn.

Choke/Clutch is the fetishization of the small sample size.

"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do." -Isaac Asimov

by shake n bake on Jul 16, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dont usually watch college football...

why? was it because Dwyer was too hard to deal with??

If you see my smilieys, think of E.M.H. - our COLTs King of Smileys!

by Manning4ever on Jul 16, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dwyer generally wasn't an easy back to take down

but Iowa had few issues with him the rest of the time. I think they just saw blood in the water and lost discipline.

They had totally blown up the point of attack on the off-tackle/stretch/whatever the outside run was, instead of eating the loss Dwyer went back towards the middle and started going backwards for more space. Obviously that was a bad move and Dwyer ended up getting chased into his own endzone, breaking lunging tackles from the D as they swarmed, before he was able to muscle out of the endzone to make the end result just terrible, not catastrophic for GT.

Choke/Clutch is the fetishization of the small sample size.

"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do." -Isaac Asimov

by shake n bake on Jul 16, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

here's the play

should have known it was an option. It was always the option with GT.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHoxx_PbA3s

Choke/Clutch is the fetishization of the small sample size.

"People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do." -Isaac Asimov

by shake n bake on Jul 16, 2010 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

thanks Shake... :)

If you see my smilieys, think of E.M.H. - our COLTs King of Smileys!

by Manning4ever on Jul 16, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

i’m not sure i believe that
Brown having successful career at LT with Saints = Brown having successful career at LT with Colts.. Brown may just be a better fit for the Saints system

by ColtfaninPitts on Jul 16, 2010 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake