Countdown to Colts Training Camp 2010: Fighting for roster spots- Keyunta Dawson
Hope everyone enjoyed their holiday weekend, especially LovinBlue who is now back from her long trek to Alaska. For those of you who sweated through a very hot weekend (95 degrees in several Midwestern and East Coast states), take heart in knowing Colts Training Camp is only 25 days away. Between now and then, we will do a little Countdown to Colts Training Camp 2010 series, highlighting the big stories and positional competitions heading into the gathering of the 2010 Indianapolis Colts in Anderson, IN.
Before the Fourth of July weekend, we talked about players "on the bubble"; fighting for a roster spot on a team loaded with young talent at several key positions. To start this series, we'll break down why certain players need to prove something in order to avoid the first set of roster cuts are scheduled in late-August.
Today, we focus on the defensive ends, starting with "the old guy" of the group.
Keyunta Dawson, DE
Colts.com did a nice article on Dawson recently. In the piece, Dawson talked about being a four year veteran, and that because of this status he's now the "old guy" of the group. The issue for Dawson is that being "the old guy" is not necessarily the situation a player like him should be in, especially when the position Dawson plays (defensive end) has a premium on speed and pass rushing ability.
Dawson possesses neither.
Ideally, the Colts will want to use Dawson the way they used Raheem Brock for years. Brock was the "run end" on running downs, and often played DT on passing downs. He was more effective as a rusher on the interior, and sometimes was used as a "Joker" linebacker. Unfortunately for Dawson, I haven't seen him excel in any of these roles.
I don't consider this "Gospel," but Pro Football Focus' metrics do paint a fairly accurate portrait of Dawson's productivity. They rank him at -19 overall and a piss poor -2.4 in run defense. For the whole season, PFF recorded only two "stops" made by Dawson, who saw 339 snaps in 2009 and started in two games. That's a healthy number for a reserve. If you look at him compared to other defensive ends with a similar number of snaps, his lack of productivity is even more noticeable. I mean, Dawson makes Jaguars draft bust Quentin Groves look good by comparison.
The Colts drafted Ricardo Mathews last April and Bill Polian specifically referred to him as a "run end" during the draft press conference. With first round rookie defensive end Jerry Hughes also in the fold, it's hard to see what role Dawson could play for the Colts in 2010. He simply does not excel at anything. Sure, he can play probably every position on the d-line, which offers some flexibility, but so does Mathews (in theory) and possibly second year d-lineman Mitch King. John Gill and Ervin Baldwin are also fighting for roster spots. Both offer flexibility and special teams experience.
If there's a place Dawson can showcase improvement, it's run defense. If he wants to stay employed as a Colts defensive player, he absolutely must show he can be stout against the run either as an end or a tackle. If he can do it for both, he will stay on this roster. That's a big "if" though because I have yet to see Dawson play consistent enough to warrant a spot in 2010.
I personally don't think Dawson is a "bad" player. I mean, he's not Gilbert Gardner or anything. He's just not "good" at any one thing. He offers flexibility, but being "flexibly mediocre" doesn't justify a roster spot, especially when the team has invested two draft picks on the defensive end position this season.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Completely agree with the assessment
He’s not the type of guy that warrents a spot on the roster this year, assuming he makes no drastic improvement AND the other Dlinemen are who we think they should be.
He is however, the type of guy that plays hard, and is a servicable guy when injuries come into play. Thus, if he’s a street free agent at any point, I could see him being picked back up by the Colts the way Josh Thomas was last year when injuries are bound to catch up with us.
I don't see him making the team
And I never understood, why he played in the playoffs instead of Baldwin, who was a lot better in the last two weeks. He also lacks upside, so even if he is the fifth best, I could see the 6th best making the team, if he could be developed into a better player in a short time.
This^^
I think the Colts are willing to take a drop in current ability at a backup position for future potential. Besides, this is a backup spot anyway, so while Freeney and Mathis do get rotated out from time to time, its not like the backups are really going to be getting much in the way of serious playing time anyway. Oh, and I’d like to see Foster knock Dawson out of the lineup to be honest. Foster is a much better Tackle than Dawson, and has the speed and build of an end (his natural position) so if we really wanted a replacement for Brock, I’d rather us go with Foster if Moala can get good enough to replace Foster in the DT rotation.
"I shall not fear. Fear is the Mind killer. Fear is the little death that leads to total obliteration. I will face my fear and let it pass through me. When the fear is gone, there shall be nothing. Only I shall remain."
-Frank Herbert "Dune" (1965)
Gilbert Gardner...
was one of the greatest Colts ever. How dare you disrespect him.
:)
Dawson is definitly no good...
The Colts wouldn’t lose anything by letting him go. Wouldn’t totally surprise if they keep him as a cheap backup though.
Kick Dawson to the curb
He is not what the Colts need. Bad player that plays bad. Put a fork in him, he is done.
King is more our style
I like Key Dawson but if he loses his spot my heart won’t be broken. Same thing with Baldwin, although of the two I prefer dawson
Curious...
Why do you prefer Dawson? What parts of his game do you think are better than Baldwin’s? I’m just curious.
I’ve thought about the issue at DE for awhile and I admire Dawson’s hard work and contributions to this team when it needed them but I can’t come up with a single part of the game that he does well. I thought Dawson looked faster, stronger, and performed better when he had his chance.
If you saw something different, that is cool. I just want to know what you saw.
Between two physical equals
all I saw was Dawson being a little more equal. You said it when you said you thought Dawson looked faster and preformed more consistently in the clutch. That’s all it takes on this team, right? Key Dawson makes tackles, and had one big fumble recovery last year that I can remember… Our observations are born out by the fact that Dawson routinely cracks the starting rotation over Baldwin. I seriously doubt I saw something that you missed: this is why I read your blog – to catch the things that I miss. In a street fight, my money is on mitch king. The colts could use another streetfighter, in my opinion.
oh shit late for work!
I made a mistake...
I meant to say Baldwin looked faster, stronger, and performed better when he had his chance. But it’s neither here nor there. I understand why you feel the way you do: starting, a fumble recovery, and tackling in your mind are Dawson’s upsides over Baldwin. I was just curious what you saw that I was missing :)

by 















