Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

The reason Raheem Brock left the Colts: Lack of playing time

Well, we finally have an answer as to why Raheem Brock requested his release from the Colts back in March. The info comes directly from the man himself, and it's probably not going to rub Colts fans the right way. From USA Today:

Brock asked for his release from Indy in March, saying he wasn't getting the pass-rushing opportunities he wanted on third down because the Colts have Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis leading their charge.

"I was trying to get a better opportunity to rush the quarterback,'' Brock said. "I think I am in a good situation where I have to take advantage of it, plain and simple.

Let me preface this next part by saying I still like Raheem Brock, and I wish him all the best... except when he plays the Colts twice this season.

However, his reasoning for requesting a release from the team is just silly. Brock is essentially upset he did not get more pass rushing opportunities so he can up his sack total and (surprise!) ask for more money. The reality is Brock is past his prime, and he was never all that great rushing the passer from the end spot even when he was younger.

Star-divide

He was once pretty good rushing from the defensive tackle position, but with better interior rushers like Daniel Muir and Eric Foster on the team, the Colts started using Brock as a "joker" linebacker on third down, rushing the passer in that capacity.

Basically, the team gave Brock several opportunities to hit the opposing QB, but he couldn't consistently deliver. Despite all these opportunities, he netted only 3.5 sacks in 2009. The year before that: 3.5 again. In fact, Brock has not recorded more than 5 sacks in one season since 2005, when he was playing DT.

If he thought the team should have sat Freeney or Mathis on third down in order to free him up for more sack opportunities, then he was living in a fantasy world. Look no further than Super Bowl 44 as an example of Brock's "stellar" pass rushing moves. If there was ever one game where Brock could have used his skills as a rusher to help the team win, it was that game. Freeney was hobbled and Mathis was getting consistently doubled all night. Instead of proving he could rush the passer, he was dominated. Brock recording ZERO sacks and allowed Drew Brees (the game's MVP) to complete 32-39 passes.

I will always think fondly of Raheem Brock, and there is no question he is a popular guy within the Colts team. More than a few of his ex-teammates Tweeted him a "congrats" when news broke he signed with the Titans. However, his reasoning for leaving the Colts is for sh*t. If Brock truly felt he wanted a "better opportunity to rush the quarterback," he should have first proven he could do the job. He didn't, and that's why he's now on a depleted Titans squad with next to nobody currently available to rush the QB with him.

Poll
Now that you know Raheem Brock's reasons for leaving the team, will you still miss him as a Colts player?
Yes
262 votes
No
360 votes
Whatever (I'm apathetic about everything)
117 votes

739 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 21 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

don't really need him anymore anyways

we have freeney, mathis, hughes, foster, king, johnson, muir, moala, chick, and maybe even matthews on the line. No need for someone who doesn’t want to be there.

I have a question. may make me look like a fool. but what exactly is a “joker” linebacker? is it basically a 4th linebacker on 4-3 used as a pass rusher..so like a 4-4… or do u sub out a linebacker in the 4-3 for a pass rushing linebacker so that it still stats a 4-3?

by ABlueColt on Aug 13, 2010 11:17 AM EDT reply actions  

The way I understand it

is that you make your 4-3 (4 down linemen + 3 backers) into temporary a 3-4 by standing up Brock and letting him roam around with the LBs looking for a crease to rush the QB or zero in on the ball carrier in the event of a running play.

"We ARE going to our own private island, Chris: it's called the State Fucking Fair!"

by naptown_ninja on Aug 13, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Colts used it a lot in nickel packages

They’d run a 4-2-5, normally with Freeney, Foster, Brock and Mathis. Brock would be the only lineman not in a 3-point stance, instead having free reign to move around the line, finding the best gap to attack to get to the quarterback.

I personally hated it and found it ineffective (Brock simply lacked the acceleration and speed), but I expect Hughes to be much, much better in that capacity.

by hoosierstudent on Aug 13, 2010 11:28 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm sure he read the writing on the wall

Brock prolly should have in someone else’s 3-4 scheme from the beginning…. which begs a couple questions, why THIS division (which doesn’t feature 3-4 D)? Does he want to get his ass handed to him by his ex-teamates that badly?

 I always liked Brock also and I bet the Colts would’ve liked to have kept him… with a contract commensurate with his on-field contribution. I don’t blame him: he knows there’s a lockout coming and needs to get paid.

"We ARE going to our own private island, Chris: it's called the State Fucking Fair!"

by naptown_ninja on Aug 13, 2010 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

"would like to have kept him"

"We ARE going to our own private island, Chris: it's called the State Fucking Fair!"

by naptown_ninja on Aug 13, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

He led the defensive linemen in snaps last season

I was going to cite Pro Football Focus, but the site has become subscription-only shakes phone in anger. Nonetheless, I believe Brock was fourth or fifth on the defense in snaps, behind Bethea, Lacey, Brackett, and maybe Bullitt.

He had all the chances he needed.

by hoosierstudent on Aug 13, 2010 11:23 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

PFF

Them moving to a subscription-only set-up REALLY pissed me off. They were such a resource. Really enjoyed promoting them. Now, they suck. FO doesn’t “charge” for their stats. Why the hell would anyone pay for PFF’s? Terrible move on their part.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Aug 13, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Completely agree

I hate subscription fees. I would consider paying for Eric Hartz’s Colt Power site, but no way would I pay for PFF, especially with FO available.

by hoosierstudent on Aug 13, 2010 11:32 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Speaking of PFF

They rated Brock as the worst 4-3 DE in the NFL last year. Take that as you will.

by hoosierstudent on Aug 13, 2010 11:33 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I disagree - somewhat

There are guys in sports who need more time in a game to get into a groove, and others who are able to put the pedal to the metal at the whistle. Brock sounds like he’s saying I was never able to really get the chances to put in the time.

It’s easy to pass this off as him whining about money, but sometimes we forget that two of the games best players at DE are on the Colts team. If Brock really wanted a chance to become a decent DE, he needed those reps. Whether he fails at it for another team or not, he’d never really be able to showcase his stuff on a ROUTINE basis with the Colts. I remember a guy by the name of Steve Young who sat behind two great QB’s and only got a chance to shine due to a serious injury to a HOF QB.

Yes, we can say well he had a great chance to shine in the SB, but that’s not a fair shake. The guy was constantly being moved around and never really given the chance to stay put. As hoosierstudent just posted, he had plenty of snaps…..but those were at DT, DE, Joker LB, etc…..the guy was not lining up at one position all game….which impacts his productivity…

I concur with Naptown_Ninja as that he most likely knew he wouldn’t be around much longer and wanted a chance for one last ride somewhere else. Brock would fit better in a 3-4, and I’m glad someone else besides me commented on that.

Look, my opinion means squat, but I can’t fault the guy for wanting to see if he could be a better player at one position……or simply wanting to see if he could be the player he thinks he is… however, I do know that I will always love the guy for being a big part of the Colts. He was a great player to the fans, as he always made time for us. On the field, he may have been a slightly above average player, but he was always a good teammate.

I wish him well, and I hope the O-Line stomps their feet in his grill when they run over him twice a season…

by DevilsReject on Aug 13, 2010 11:26 AM EDT reply actions   2 recs

"I wish him well, and I hope the O-Line stomps their feet in his grill when they run over him twice a season…"

Good line.

SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account so you can post a FanPost, make a FanShot, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.

by Brad Wells on Aug 13, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well played, sir. Rec for you.

"The best defensive player is the sideline." - Trevor Pryce, on how to stop Peyton Manning

by szquirrel on Aug 13, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I can't blame him for wanting out.

He knew he was next to useless on this defense. Between the superstar ends and the surprisingly efficient tackles he was pretty much just there when absolutely needed. Maybe he’ll get a chance with Tenn since their defense practically went down the shitter last year…

Anyone remember that Pats game?? OMG! LMAO! Sorry, just thought about it again :)

Ahhhhh….two days till PS game 1!

by etid5353 on Aug 13, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Think of it like this..

If your only choice in your job field was to join a rival or sit at home broke….what would you do? A lot of middle of the pack or average players wind up doing this simply because of the chance of being able to continue playing….it’s not even necessarily about the money.

Sure, you have the occasional superstar player that does this, but usually it takes a trade or a huge payday to make it happen..

In the case of most of the Colts players who have left here and signed with divisional rivals….they’ve never really been any better elsewhere than they were here….

by DevilsReject on Aug 13, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

I still believe that he saw what was coming (Him getting cut) and decided to leave the Colts on his own accord instead. I, for one, don’t hold it against him in the least. I’d rather he went to an NFC team or at least a team outside the division but you have to admit that Colts players going down to Tenn. to get paid is becoming somewhat of a tradition.

"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James

by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Aug 13, 2010 11:55 AM EDT reply actions  

While I respect Brock

I was waiting for the press to start laughing, when he mentioned Pro Bowl and more opportunities for himself… He needs confidence, but he will have a hard time making the Titans.

by Ty46 on Aug 13, 2010 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm not rubbed the wrong way one bit

Consider this – let’s say you’re on a project team with a fabulous project manager, a star lead architect, and a few developers. The career path is such that the incentives are to move into a lead architect or project manager role, but the developers only get the opportunity to play those roles when the incumbent is on vacation or out of the office.

For the sake of their career, one of these developers decides that it’s time for him to find another opportunity where he could rise to lead architect or project manager. Would you begrudge him that opportunity? even if he goes to the competitor to do it? even if you think he doesn’t have the capability to perform those roles?

I don’t. He may not get the job he seeks, but in my mind he’s maintained a lot of integrity by identifying the situation that will work the best for him. By staying in the current situation, he may not be motivated to perform his best, and I wouldn’t want that, either.

As for Brock, I’ll miss him and I’ll root for him (except on a couple of key games). I even hope he eventually comes back to retire a Colt (though I suspect he won’t).

How can you not love a team that does this?

by LovinBlue on Aug 13, 2010 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I dont have ill-will towards him

I dont think he had much to contribute to the Colts anymore. The only two spots I could see him having a semblance of impact is if he switched back to DT and was used only in pass rush situations at that spot or as a “joker” LB. He would have essentially been regulated as a situational role player and would have seen a significant decline in his playing time

by metal_militia on Aug 13, 2010 2:20 PM EDT reply actions  

He wasn’t angry that he didn’t get more playing time. He fully understood why. He simply wants a chance to make a pro bowl and he wasn’t going to get that playing behind 2 pro bowl ends. He doesn’t care about the money and he doesn’t care about the Superbowl because he’s already done that. He wants a pro bowl. He’s willing to take the risk to try and get it. Who can blame him? Not me.

by wcwills on Aug 13, 2010 3:03 PM EDT reply actions  

THIS

His reasons, in my opinion, were simple, straight-forward, and reasonable. It was not a lack of playing time, nor a problem with the organizations decision to start/play Freeney/Mathis when it counted and statistics were readily available. It is that he is completely aware he has reached or passed the peak of his career and the only accomplishment he has failed to attain to this point is a Pro Bowl bid.

Whether it is “possible” for him at this point in his career or not, there was NO way he was going to get a chance to earn a Pro Bowl bid in Indianapolis. With Vanden Bosch’s exit, he has a chance to win a spot as one of the primary pass rushing defensive ends in Tennessee. If he has any chance to win a Pro Bowl bid, it will be in a situation like that. Good for him, good luck.

Thanks to MarkFive05 I have a new theme video that I hope you all will remember me by: BAM BAM
Also visit my new blog: Coltzilla

by bamock on Aug 13, 2010 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake