Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

A Quick Offseason Guide For The Indianapolis Colts

If you're a casual fan, or heck, even a hardcore fan, the uncertainty of the yet-to-be-negotiated CBA probably has you scratching your head wondering what comes next this time of year, now that the Colts are out of title contention and must wait until September to play another meaningful snap.  There are a lot of things that much happen before the Colts take the field again, though, and of course few if any of those mechanisms will operate with expected functionality until/if the new CBA is negotiated.  We've already laid out some of them, in terms of CBA disputes and owner clashes, but that just covers the first part of our calendar.

I thought we might break down what to expect this offseason, though, if nothing else to give us a calendar or timeline of sorts to operate from, if nothing else to direct conversational priorities when it comes to "well, what next?"

Assuming this offseason has the same purpose as any other offseason, the Colts have a lot of work to do.  They have several players eligible for either unrestricted or restricted free agency, a handful of players with sensitive contract situations, an opportunity to make some moves in free agency (which Bill Polian has hinted at, a rarity for him) without the "Final Eight" restrictions they faced last year and finally the best draft position they've had since 2002, when they took Dallas Clark in the first round.

It's going to be an interesting offseason to say the least, and I have a feeling it will be a bit noisier than your typical one.  After the jump, let's take a look at what the chronology might look like.  Feel free to make any suggested additions or comments, obviously, as I don't consider this anything close to a comprehensive list in this form.  It's just a guide.

Star-divide

1.  The CBA must be re-negotiated.

In my eyes, this has to be the number one priority.  Is it possible for things to happen without a new CBA?  Yes, and they probably will as this drags on.  But a new CBA has to be negotiated and implemented in order for this season to carry on as usual.

As it stands, Polian has already laid out four front office approaches to this offseason:

  1. A CBA is worked out prior to March 4.
  2. A short work stoppage occurs.
  3. A long work stoppage occurs.
  4. Both sides agree to operate under an undefined "set of rules" separate from the CBA.

Those are basically the four options.  Obviously, we'll all be pulling for the first option to be realized.  But option two would see players on strike through the preseason and potentially into the regular season and option three would probably usher in a regular season full of scab players like Shane Falco.  Options two and three would see players locked out of competition for varying amounts of time. Option four, wherein both the NFLPA and owners have some sort of odd mutual understanding, seems to be the least likely scenario.

We'll assume for the remainder of the chronology that option one is realized.  But this has to be realized for a standard offseason, preseason and regular season to take effect.

2.  The Colts must come to terms with Peyton Manning.

Before the Colts can make any sort of financial decisions for the rest of their club, before they can consider their cap situation, they have to figure out how much they're going to pay Manning.  The Colts' star quarterback will undoubtedly, and deservedly, command the largest contract in NFL history.  Now the Colts just have to figure out how that affects 2011 and situates the franchise going forward.

My guess is that Manning receives a heavily back-loaded contract with a hefty signing bonus so that his actual 2011 cap hit is manageable.  The Colts know that, assuming guys like Austin Collie and Dallas Clark can return healthy and they play their cards right in terms of re-signing valuable players and dipping their toes in the free agent pool, they'll have a championship-caliber roster for 2011.  They've already got the core guys, or at least have first dibs at re-negotiating with the ones whose contracts are up.  They just need to sprinkle in some supporting cast on special teams (which, judging from the Colts' history under Polian, is easier said than done) and reinforcements along the offensive and defensive lines and the secondary.  This isn't a complete renovation, it's merely a reinforcement and Manning's 2011 cap hit -- again, assuming there is a salary cap in 2011 -- needs to allow for the Colts to add these players while primed to make a very realistic title run.

This isn't necessarily mortgaging the future for the present, although sometimes I don't think that's the worst idea (I'd rather have a sure bet for a few years followed by a barren stretch than merely a shot every year.)  It's entirely within the realm of possibility that the Colts push Peyton's cap hits back into the latter years of his contract and re-negotiate with him when they begin to hamper the team's ability to operate under the cap.  Hopefully by then, the cap will have gone up enough and the one-up economy of NFL contracts will have provided for some breathing room, allowing someone else to be the NFL's highest-paid player.  A bit of a gamble, sure, but it's probably the smart play for the Colts right now.

3.  The Colts will need to finalize medical assessments of several players.

With Manning's contract done, the Colts will then need to analyze the viability of several players with health concerns, whose abilities to contribute in 2011 are at least somewhat in question.  Specifically, this concerns Collie, Clark, Anthony Gonzalez and, of course, their featured concern: Bob Sanders.

Clark and Gonzalez are pretty much locks to return and return healthy (staying healthy is another regard), but I'd look for both to be cleared for work early in the offseason.  The only reason I even mention Clark is because his surgery was so sensitive and rare that it's at least worth noting; I've heard nothing in the way of either setbacks or successes in regards to his rehab.  Gonzalez gets a mention, of course, because he's hurt so often that team doctors have to at least consider the risk vs reward factor.

Collie and Sanders are the biggest medical question marks, in my opinion.  All signs point to Collie returning, but at the very least, the Colts will have to research options when it comes to keeping Collie concussion-free, specifically in the equipment department.  No technology is going to be able to completely shield Collie from concussions, but surely a helmet change wouldn't hurt and I think Polian is inclined to agree.  Also, since Collie's injury concerns his head and, specifically, his brain, it's a more sensitive issue than most other injury concerns.  Personally, I don't want to see Collie risk anything for the entertainment of Colts fans.  By all accounts, he's a great guy with a young family and it's just not worth it.  Would it hurt the Colts' chances at a Super Bowl run next year?  Certainly.  But no championship banner is worth a guy not being able to remember his kids' birthday parties.  Collie has to do what's best for him, and after consulting with team doctors, I'm sure he'll make that decision.

Sanders, however, is far more likely to raise concerns.  I can't even imagine the red flags that have accrued on his medical record.  Knee, shoulder, left bicep, right bicep...Bob is a walking Operation board game.  There are going to be serious questions about his cost vs productivity.  Sanders is due a $5 million base salary in 2011 that only increases going forward, so if the Colts are going to cut him, this is the perfect juncture to do so, before they incur major cap hits for dumping his salary.  Since it is such an opportunistic time for the Colts to act, Sanders will have to check out as 100 percent ready-to-go and almost mathematically eliminated from sustaining another injury going forward.  His body will pretty much need to be rebuilt in cyborg form.  Does anyone realistically see him surviving this assessment?  Not this writer.  

The best case scenario for the Colts when it comes to Sanders is that they can convince him to re-negotiate his contract to allow for substantially-lower base salary figures accompanied by high-end incentive clauses, i.e. a $2 million base salary escalated to $6 million if Sanders plays 14 games.  This is the feel-good scenario that allows Sanders to remain a Colt and fans to retain patience in Sanders.  Is this realistic, though?  Probably not.  I'd be inclined to say Sanders needs to at least consider any such offer should it come across the table if nothing else because he's cashed so many checks on his way to the training room these last few seasons.  But it's the NFL and the NFL is business, and I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Sanders and his agent scoffed at such an offer and promptly took his talents to someone else's training room on someone else's dime.

As a brief aside, I don't understand the hatred for Sanders, though.  I really don't think he's milking it.  I think he's of a build that's not well-suited to the NFL, I think he's been extremely unfortunate with some of these injuries and, frankly, and I say this without any evidence whatsoever but my common sense, I think he's on or has been on performance-enhancing drugs.  I think the combination of these three things has put Sanders in the position he's in, especially using PEDs to overcompensate for the other two drawbacks.  Again, far be it from me to levy an accusation without evidence, I'm just sharing what I think and what most of you have probably at least thought in passing on a handful of occasions.  It just seems like no one wants to say it.  But I look at his build and some of his injuries (both biceps) and have to think PEDs at least played a role in them.  I realize it's a fairly heavy assumption to draw, but I don't think it's entirely out of the ballpark either.  I think Sanders is trying very hard to stay relevant in the NFL but just can't quite do it.

4.  The Colts will need to make non-free agent roster decisions, i.e. cap casualties.

This goes hand-in-hand with medical decisions.  The Colts will need to decide which players are simply not worth their cap hits anymore.  Two players highly likely to be scrutinized in this regard are Sanders and Ryan Diem.  Diem is due $5.4 million in 2011 and hardly played like a five million dollar tackle this year.  Like Sanders, Diem is at a point where it's advantageous for the team to cut him and avoid heavier base salaries down the road, which immediately opens him up to the possibility of being a cap casualty.

I'm sure some folks will mention Gonzalez here as well, but personally I think that's nuts.  Gonzo is set to make $2.76 million in 2011 and by all accounts could have returned this past year had Polian not made a handful of questionable injury/roster decisions.  I think, for $2.76 million, the guy is at least worth bringing in to camp and seeing what he can still offer this offense.  2010 proved that you can never have enough skill players on offense who know the system.  Some of those stretches that featured Brandon James and Blair White at receiver were absolute nightmares.  Gonzo is at least worth keeping because he knows the system and has good timing with Manning.  If he can make it through camp and preseason without injury, I think he absolutely deserves a chance to play in 2011.  And if he gets injured...so what?  The Colts are out a little under $3 million and he makes their 2011 offseason decision infinitely easier in regards to retaining his services.

5.  The Colts will have to decide which of their free agents to let walk and which to re-sign.

We've already taken a look at this, but the Colts will have to decide who out of their free agent class is worth keeping and who is worth wishing well and allowing to hit the market.  The Colts have 16 players due for new contracts in 2011.  They are:

Obviously, Manning will be re-signed.  We've already covered that base.  But after that, who else will be re-signed?  Again, we've had a look at that question already, but it's also worth noting that Foster and Robinson are restricted free agents, meaning the Colts have the chance to offer them low-end, one-year deals as they did with guys like Bullitt and C.Johnson in 2010.  I would look for the Colts to extend a one-year offer to Foster and neglect to send anything to Robinson but a Christmas card.

At the risk of stating the obvious, any other decisions are going to come down to the Colts' personnel strategy for 2011.  Are they going to significantly improve the offensive line and allow a back like Donald Brown more running room?  Maybe that makes Joseph Addai more expendable.  Are they going to go after special teams aces?  That makes them less likely to re-negotiate with guys like Jamie Silva, Keyunta Dawson and Aaron Francisco.  Are they comfortable with the depth they have at linebacker?  Then Clint Session might be allowed to walk.

Personally, I think that Addai, Bullitt, C. Johnson and A. Johnson have to be re-signed.  I'm taking a "believe it when I see it" approach to the offensive line, which means that Addai will continue to be the best option for this offense without a good run-blocking line.  Bullitt was a special teams captain prior to injury and should more or less be considered a starting safety for this team (any play from Sanders is a luxury.)  C. Johnson is an invaluable plug-in on a beleaguered offensive line that can start at either tackle position or at guard.  And finally, A. Johnson was without a doubt the best Indy defensive tackle last year, despite what Polian might say about Fili Moala.  A. Johnson's re-signing is particularly prioritized by the pending departure of Muir - not that Muir is very good, but the Colts need big bodies at the position and can't afford to have Moala as their lone heavyweight.

After that, it would be nice to have Vinatieri back, but I don't doubt that deal gets done.  And guys like Hagler, Rhodes, Session and Silva are helpful but not necessary.  I wouldn't be surprised to see some of these guys back, but none -- except perhaps Vinatieri -- are as important as the aforementioned players.  I really don't see Session coming back, mostly because the Colts tend to let their weak-side linebackers walk and Session proved himself to replaceable this past season.  I could see him asking for $4-5 million per year, and that's just not something the Colts are going to pay to a player they don't really need.  Kavell Conner proved himself a more-than-adequate replacement.

6.  The Colts need to explore free agent options.

Polian suggested that the front office may take a different approach (read: active interest) in regards to free agency this year.  And really, he has to.  The Colts can't keep relying on the draft to stock their franchise.  One bad draft throws that off.  A few bad choices, as Polian has had in recent years, really throws that off.  I hate to say it, but New England is the model franchise for franchise-building right now.  They consider both the draft and free agency, drafting guys who fit their system and signing free agents who bring a veteran presence and are a known, tested commodity.

Specifically, the Colts will need to utilize free agency to restock special teams.  They need to invest in this side of the ball for a change.  They need to sign some aces, some guys who are specifically hired to cover kicks.  We've seen too many times in recent years what happens when you ignore special teams, and that's not just a product of injury.  The Colts have had relatively healthy years where special teams coverage has been lackluster as well.  Polian tends to at least attempt to address whatever unit he calls out in his postgame for the Colts' last game of the year, and that happened to be special teams this year (though we saw how well poorly he addressed the offensive line after calling them out last year.)  

The Colts should mainly focus on OL, DT and CB/S in free agency this year, hopefully getting guys who can double up as position players and special teamers.  Don't expect any huge splashes, though.  It's possible that they make a big signing, but I think Polian is more likely to make a few smaller signings (like when he signed Brandon Stokley and Montae Reagor in the 2003 offseason) than any major signing.  And that makes sense, because the Colts don't need a superstar.  They need some role players who can perform their roles well.

Here's a look (not even close to comprehensive) at players I think the Colts could at least "look" at in free agency:

The only "big ticket" names on this list are Bushrod, Mankins, Mebane and Landry.  That makes sense, to me, because the Colts' biggest needs are at OL, DT and S.  They don't need a Terrell Owens or DeAngelo Williams, they need help in the trenches and secondary.

At WR, I thought Curtis and Stuckey would be interesting names because both could contribute a lot on special teams.  Curtis was once dominant in Philadelphia with Donovan McNabb and if he could establish any kind of rapport with Manning...well, you could do worse for a WR5.  Stuckey would be a special teams signing.

At OT, there isn't a plethora of available talent.  The best tackles, Doug Free and Tyson Clabo, will almost certainly remain with their teams.  The Saints will probably have to decide between Bushrod and Carl Nicks, and if Nicks wins out, Bushrod could become available.   Brown and Hunter are in the same build, probably more RTs than LTs, but the Colts could use an upgrade at either position (with C. Johnson either flipping to the opposite tackle spot or sliding inside to guard.)  Bottom line: there aren't a lot of amazing names on the market.  These are options, but if the Colts are going to tackle the problem at tackle (see what I did there?), they'll probably have to do so through the draft.

Same story at OG, although Mankins is there with surely substantial contract demands.  I've seen the Colts snipe a certain free agent from New England before, so I wouldn't be shocked if the Colts made a play.  Surprised, yes.  But not shocked.  The Colts could certainly use him.  Yanda is another interesting name; he reminds me a lot of C. Johnson in that he's extremely versatile.  I doubt Baltimore lets him walk, though.  

At DT, Mebane would be a dream signing for the Colts but Seattle probably keeps him under contract.  Pity, too, because he would make an excellent three-technique for the Colts.  Hayden is another interesting name and has had a rollercoaster career as the only semi-competent DT in Carolina.  Watson or Ayodele would more or less just be replacements for Muir, with Ayodele clearly being the better of the two.  Big bodies.

The Colts are at a crossroads at corner: do they want more man covers or do they want to scale back man coverage and incorporate more zone coverage into their scheme?  I don't know, but I just illustrated a few targets in either case.  Marshall is an excellent run defender who has struggled in coverage at times but would make a very good nickel back.  Both Carrs have great speed and would instantly upgrade both special teams and CB depth.  Routt's an interesting story with Nnamdi Asomugha set to become a free agent.  No way he moves if Asomugha leaves Oakland, but if he does, he's a guy whose speed has to at least tempt the Colts.

Finally, at safety, the Colts could make a major signing with Landry that would put them at least three-deep at safety with Bullitt and Bethea.  I like Landry as a box safety for the Colts.  Abdullah and Zbikowski are both young players that would help special teams tremendously.

We'd be lucky to see the Colts sign one of these guys and I realize that.  These are just some names for consideration.  But, counter to Polian's usual plans, he will actually have consider some names this offseason.

7.  The Colts need to nail this draft.

They won't gain much in terms of compensatory draft picks (remember, they cut Ryan Lilja and Raheem Brock so they receive no compensation for their releases, and between Tim Jennings, Marlin Jackson, Hank Baskett, Lance Ball and Matt Giordano, the Colts would be lucky to see two seventh-round compensatory picks.)  But the Colts do have the best draft position they've had since 2002, possessing the 22nd pick of the NFL Draft.

Right now, the Colts, have the following picks:

  • Round 1, pick 22
  • Round 2, pick 21
  • Round 3, pick 23
  • Round 4, pick 22
  • Round 5, pick 21
  • Round 6, pick 23
  • Round 7, pick 22

I can guarantee that this draft order does not stand, though.  Compensatory picks have yet to be factored into any of these rounds, and the Colts still owe Washington a conditional pick for Justin Tryon.  As Tryon played so well and unexpectedly started so many games this year, they could owe the Redskins up to a fifth-round pick.

We'll know more about the Colts' available picks later, but for now, I can just tell you that the Colts have to nail this draft.  No more projects.  No more guys unable to help on special teams.  They need to find players who can play, and play well, off the bat.  If they're not ready to start right away, they need to be ready to make an impact on special teams right away.  This is an important draft, folks.  

For once, the Colts may not be lacking for line prospects at pick 22, both offensively and defensively.  That alone is reason to make that first-round pick count.  It's also possible that the Colts could trade up or down from that pick, depending on how they like (or don't like) this draft's depth.

Now, I've rambled on and on about how the Colts need help on the lines and in the secondary, but my favorite player of this draft - at least for the Colts - is Boise State WR Austin Pettis.  Unfortunately, his draft stock has propelled him to perhaps a mid-second round (and rising) prospect, but I can't remember the last time I've seen a college player who so obviously was meant to be a Colt.  I won't be upset if the Colts don't draft him in lieu of finding line talent, but I'm telling you, that kid would make a very good Indy receiver.

Players who might be available at pick 22 include: USC OT Tyron Smith, Oregon State DT Stephen Paea, Colorado OT Nate Solder, Boston College OT Anthony Castonzo, Mississippi State OT Derek Sherrod, Florida G Mike Pouncey, Wisconsin OT Gabe Carimi, Penn State G Stefen Wisniewski, Illinois DT Corey Liuget, Alabama OL DeMarcus Love and TCU G Marcus Cannon.

We'll break down the draft a little more as it gets closer and the Colts' picks shape up.

8.  The Colts will need to continue unearthing prospects in undrafted free agency.

Nothing new here.  You can fault Polian for a few things, but undrafted free agency is hardly one of them.  Year after year, he unearths undrafted players who end up contributing in a major way.  This year, we saw Blair White, Javarris James, Jeff Linkenbach and Cornelius Brown make some notable contributions for the Colts.  In years past, we've seen Bullitt, Rhodes, Gary Brackett, Jeff Saturday, etc.  

The nice thing about undrafted free agency is that the cream of the UDFA crop will always be interested in Indianapolis.  Why?  Because Indy always gives them a chance to come in, state their claim for a roster spot and contribute when needed during in meaningful games.  Also, the Colts can take a shotgun approach to undrafted free agency.  They don't just have to worry about upgrading their need areas, but can just actively seek out players.  It doesn't matter if they find a WR who can play ball or a TE or a LB, they can just find guys who project to be solid NFL players.

That should about cover the offseason chronology.  If there are any steps I forgot, feel free to chime in.  Otherwise, feel free to comment on what's here.

Comment 37 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I consider..

Gaither to be a realistic target. The Ravens have a lot of people to pay this year, and I don’t think they can afford to keep him at the money he’ll want for what in essence to them is a RT.

I think he’d be the best upgrade on the O-line for us.

AKA Ben. J Savage.

by Ben Savage on Jan 15, 2011 5:40 PM EST reply actions  

I think the back is a red flag

You could be right and I wouldn’t boo the signing. But there were questions about his attitude this time last year and now there are questions about his health. If I’m Polian, I’m just not going to invest a lot of money in a guy with that many questions attached.

Writer for Stampede Blue.

by Collin McCollough on Jan 15, 2011 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

free agents

both cullen jenkins dt green bay and justin blalock are free agents and would be excellent pickups.I know jenkins plays DE now but has played dt before with excellent results.

by zorro7114 on Jan 15, 2011 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

Not correct
But option two would see players on strike through the preseason and potentially into the regular season and option three would probably usher in a regular season full of scab players like Shane Falco

The players are not planning to strike… the owners are planning to lock them out. Therefore, they will not hire replacement, or “scab,” players.

How can you not love a team who does this?
Read great Colts analysis on Coltzilla and follow me on Twitter

by LovinBlue on Jan 15, 2011 6:21 PM EST reply actions  

Great post...

…just wanted to give you two thumbs up. I have followed football closely for a few years now and only slowly begin to understand its depth (and stampedeblue has helped me a lot with this). From my personal opinion, this was a nice balanced post – not too critical (which at least for me, didn’t make me feel any better about the loss to the Jets) and not too positive. It appeared realistic, and that was nice. I’d love to see some FA signings and a great draft, it’s all I’m looking forward to right now with regards to football. I just can’t get myself to watch NFL games right now :-) Oh, one last word: you might wanna cut the QUICK in the headline, this was a quite substantive and long post :-)

by Azrael1987 on Jan 15, 2011 6:23 PM EST reply actions  

Polian's inability to cut his losses

Has severely affected the Colts cap room with Sanders. Again, stubbornness has negatively impacted the optimal talent on this roster. Hey Bill, have you ever made a wrong decision?? No of course not, I’m always correct, that’s why I’m president.

by MakinitWayne on Jan 15, 2011 11:49 PM EST reply actions  

Bob

I’m not sure why you assume Bob Sanders is on PED’s. Does that mean Maurice Jones-Drew is also? You did refer to his frame. I’m pretty sure that MJD has pretty much an identical frame to Bob. I also am surprised to see you stating that Anthony Gonzalez is going to stick around given that you guys have constantly said he was a goner ever since week one. Now all of a sudden you say the opposite. I guess you are going to start supporting Curtis Painter, Mike Pollak, Caldwell, and Polian.

by coxandreweric on Jan 15, 2011 11:59 PM EST reply actions  

'you guys'

Can’t throw BBS and Collin together. Different writers, different opinions.

by AbroadColtsFan on Jan 16, 2011 12:48 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I stated it as my personal opinion

And mine alone. I also stated that it was merely an opinion. But I just don’t see any way he’s not.

Writer for Stampede Blue.

by Collin McCollough on Jan 16, 2011 1:01 AM EST up reply actions  

This might be crazy, but . . .

They ought to think about moving Taj Smith to DB. He looked great on special teams, showing terrific speed, enthusiasm, and even tackling ability. He’d have developed as a WR by now if he was ever going to do it – just doesn’t have consistent enough hands. Maybe he wouldn’t be consistent enough with defensive assignments either, but it might be worth a shot.

by ex-Viking fan on Jan 16, 2011 12:01 AM EST reply actions  

Position changes like that are rare in the NFL

I don’t think it’s a terrible idea as Smith will clearly never stick as a WR alone. But it’s often too late in the game for guys to make such an extreme position change.

Writer for Stampede Blue.

by Collin McCollough on Jan 16, 2011 1:03 AM EST up reply actions  

great write up

I agree on many points, but the Sanders PED allegation might bring some unwanted attention your way. Someone just needs to quote you out of context in a major article and you could reach BBS level. That being said, you may be right.

by AbroadColtsFan on Jan 16, 2011 12:46 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

I didn't mean for that to be the focus of the write-up

Just my honest, personal opinion. He wouldn’t be the first DB to do it. Just seems like given his build and injury history, it makes sense. Guys take HGH all the time to speed up recovery.

Writer for Stampede Blue.

by Collin McCollough on Jan 16, 2011 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Most of the NFL is. Sooner or later it will come to light. Football is a perfect sport to use Anabolics and HGH.

by dbcb on Jan 16, 2011 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

And the biggest give away is a bicep tear. Or wait 2. In back to back years. That is quite an unusual injury to just pop a bicep muscle.

by madamz on Jan 18, 2011 3:48 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Playoffs

Peyton Manning aught to go see Ben Roethlisberger on the off season to findout How to win playoff games since Mannings been in 9 and only has 1 ring to show for it .Where as Ben Has 2 in less time then Peyton in yrs.

by momsnytmare on Jan 16, 2011 1:10 AM EST reply actions  

18to88.com

Educate yourself

Anyone who has a problem with Joseph should stop watching Colts football. It's unfair to expect a back to replace Edge, and Addai has been excellent in all areas when he is healthy.

by DontHateAddai on Jan 16, 2011 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

What I hear you saying is

there’s a ton of good stuff to write about this off season. Great write-up!

The Bob Sanders PED thing doesn’t bother me. You said you don’t know, for sure, and everyone who says he’s definitely not using them doesn’t know either. The bigger issue is interesting to me. Given the way the rules are written (here’s the list of banned substances – don’t get caught) and what these athletes put their bodies through to recover from injuries, it seems logical that some use of these substances is accepted by players, trainers, team Dr.’s, and maybe even coaches. The old argument (Cheaters!! vs. Not Cheaters!!) is stale.

Robinson, Rhodes, Francisco, Session, Dawson, and Hart are the players on yr. list of guys who need contracts that I could live without, on the team next year.

Nailing the draft is actually less important to me. What does that mean, just draft an OT, and an OG from this list? I don’t think the draft has been botched in recent years, contrary to popular opinion. This season was kind of a train wreck, but the Colts developed a lot of depth. Nailing free agency seems more important since that is where we would get our LT. I do not want a rookie protecting Manning’s blindside.

by caldwellmotivatesME on Jan 16, 2011 8:43 AM EST reply actions  

Bob

I see what you are arguing about Sanders and PEDs, but what evidence is there? Like I said, MJD has the same build, so how can you make that the basis of your claim unless you are going to include Jones-Drew? Recovery time? Dwight Freeney recovers pretty quickly too. What does that mean for him. I am surprised people still even discuss Bob Sanders. He has such a short history that he seems to have never existed.

by coxandreweric on Jan 16, 2011 10:24 AM EST reply actions  

No evidence

Like I said, just my honest opinion. Whatever that’s worth. I think guys like Bob tend to get in a cycle of PEDs, typically, because they’re already too small to play the sport, so they either seek a competitive advantage to play it, they indulge to speed their recovery time as they’re oft-injured, or both. Bob could fit any of those scenarios, and as he’s fallen further into this cycle, this opinion has become stronger.

Anymore, though, as has been correctly pointed out by caldwellmotivatesME, the majority of players are using PEDs in some form or another. The NFL testing process is a joke and the NFL knows this, but it’s just one of those things nobody’s really allowed to talk about. As long as you’re somewhat discreet about it (AKA not Brian Cushing or Shawne Merriman), you probably won’t get caught.

Writer for Stampede Blue.

by Collin McCollough on Jan 16, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Great article good information.

I hope the Colts go out and get a first tier offensive lineman in free agency. Not a lot of selection though, as you have pointed out.

I don’t think the Colts need to “nail this draft” any more then usual, like caldwellmotivatesME. The idea suggests that there is something new and wrong with the Colts, which I don’t agree with. The Colts made the playoffs with 18 players on IR. Many of the players that helped them to get to the playoffs were rookies.

I also don’t believe the Colts have somehow been less successful in drafting in recent years.

by moocow on Jan 16, 2011 11:03 AM EST reply actions  

They need to nail the draft

if they don’t involve themselves much with free agency. They can’t go into next year with the same stock on the offensive and defensive lines, nor the depth at safety they currently have.

Writer for Stampede Blue.

by Collin McCollough on Jan 16, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Getting Rid of Bob

I understand that the Colts can’t afford another injury plagued season with Bob Sanders, but can you imagine him resigning with Tennessee or Houston and having to face him twice a year? He’d probably end up playing 5 full seasons and we’d have another Ryan Lilja/Raheem Brock… I think this is a much tougher decision than everyone is letting on, and I’m more willing to give him one more year. As rare as it is to see the conversion to WR/DB or vise versa, it’s even more rare to see a former Defensive MVP get cut before his contract expires.

by Mark Olson on Jan 16, 2011 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

Vagueness

I didn’t really explain all of that the WR/DB argument was from the ‘Could Taj Smith be converted to a DB?’ from up above. Ryan Lilja signed with the Chiefs and had a breakout year there after the Colts let him go because he was the scapegoat of last years offensive line issues. Jerry Hughes was brought in because the Colts wanted a solid 3rd pass rush DE and didn’t think Brock could do the job. Brock went on to accumulate 32 tackles, 9 sacks, and a forced fumble for the Seahawks. Jerry Hughes flopped from his initial draft predictions and badly missed one of the most important tackles of the Colts season.

by Mark Olson on Jan 16, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I miss Brock too but

He also got to play the NfC west twice. He’s been great in Seattle but how productive was he really in his last 2 or so years in Indy?

And let’s stop busting Jerry Hughes’ balls for missing the tackle on Cromartie. Cromartie is an all pro who made the first guy miss. EVERY great returner has a quick first step. He wouldn’t be fielding kickoffs if couldn’t make the first guy miss.

I think Hughes will be alright. We’ll see really quick if Mathis doesn’t get extended…

by caldwellmotivatesME on Jan 16, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Never happen

This idea of Bob Sanders going to another team and miraculously having an injury-free season after so many early exits is ridiculous. How can anyone logically look at his career and think that is going to happen. It’s a bunch of wishful thinking, that is…wishful thinking that the guy will somehow get his career back on track. Mike Lombardi was right back in the offseason. I don’ t know what he knew, but he was right, Bob’s career is over. Forget about it.

by coxandreweric on Jan 16, 2011 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Great Post.... and discussion

Arizona has an OT and OG out there that really get my heart rate up. The systems in Indy and ’zona are very compatible (they actually can run the ball though). Duece Latui is the one I really like, since he came out of USC and is used to verticle offenses. Lyle Sendlein is the other (Texas). Both of these are 4 year starters in a good offensive system.

Speaking of Arizona, I have to amend a comment earlier… I said Dallas was the sexiest alternative to Indy for Peyton, but after reflecting on the dismal shape of the NFC West and the talent in ’zona… Peyton may look out there too.

Sanders… sorry to all ye faithful. This is a ‘what have you done for me lately league’. Bye-bye. Sionara, Adios, Dahs’pitanya, Albietezein, Au’revoir. I can’t get his broke @$$ out the door fast enough. I love Gonzo, but he’s out of here too. I need you on the field not in rehab. Collie and Clark get one more year to come back from injury too. I think those two are okay and will be back to normal in ’11.

I don’t watch college football so I can’t speak intelligently on any prospects. I will say that the best lineman (IMHO) come out of the SEC and PAC10. Big Ten players (vice Ohio State) tend to get winded after November. Offensive players out of the Big East are the same way, with exceptions. There is a lot of talent in UFA RFA this year and some of it can be procured on the cheap to cover the STs. I agree that the front office needs to consider getting STs specialists in here.

Disagree 100% with everything you say about Dom. Rhodes is a Colt. He has repeatedly said he regretted going to Oakland. While Peyton won SB MVP, it should’ve went to Dom. He was much more valuable to the team during that game. And when he came back in Novmber, we miraculously found a ground game. I don’t like Brown. He can’t block, he runs into the line and falls down, and when he’s in space he gets dancing feet (since he’s not used to being in space). Keep Rhodes, Addai. Mike Hart is a good back but can’t stay healthy… if you keep him, he’s the third in RB rotation and a STer henceforth.

Those are the only disagreements I have with you though everything else is well thought out.

Lets go do what we do.

by Coltsince89 on Jan 16, 2011 1:33 PM EST reply actions  

FAs

I would say sign Mankins definately. Bushrod would be nice bc then we can have C. Johnson go in at guard. and then get wayne hunter for a ryan diem replacement. our O line would be pretty solid then and maybe donald brown could be worth something.

by 18 for prez on Jan 16, 2011 1:59 PM EST reply actions  

Great writeup on Gonzo

It would be crazy to let Gonzo go. He knows the system and Manning loves him and this team can’t have too many quality wideouts. He is much more valuable to Indy than anyone else.

by JTBLA on Jan 16, 2011 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

It just doesn't make any sense to me to cut him unless he has a chronic injury

The Colts wouldn’t save much by releasing him and that means they still have to go out and get a WR to replace him. If his cap hit was $5 million+, I’d totally understand cutting him. But as it’s only $2 million, it makes very little sense to cut him unless team docs say he’s just too risky to keep.

Writer for Stampede Blue.

by Collin McCollough on Jan 16, 2011 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice post

 One thing I noticed missing. A new commitment to special teams. Thus the firing of Ray Rychleski. The ST have been a liabilty for years. I understand Ray has only been around a couple years. But, this is a major position of weakness.

If Russia attacked Turkey from the rear, Do you think Greece would help?

by whardiek on Jan 16, 2011 3:49 PM EST reply actions  

Great Post

I have to agree with your assessment on Sanders. Why keep the guy around because he hasnt been a factor in the last three seasons and he is an expensive sideline ornament. What Im not convinced of is Manning’s re-signing with the Colts being a lock. I know everyone in the media, and elsewhere has said Manning remaining a Colt is a sure thing, but Im not totally convinced. I say there is a 1 in 4 chance Manning takes his talents elsewhere after the Colts hang the franchise tag on him next year.And if next season turns out to be a bust, Colts fans may have very well watched Manning play his last game in a Colts uniform. Consider this, at the end of last season, Irsay and Polian announced that their number one priority was to re-sign Manning and make him the highest paid player in the history of the NFL. Here we are a whole year later, it hasnt happened, and Manning even suspended all talk about a new contract until the off season. Consider what happened in week 16 last year, Irsays’s stated committment to stay with the sidline bobblehead Jim Caldwell, and the fact that there are several good teams with outstanding skill players and solid defenses that only lack a great QB. Put Manning in a Broncos, Texans, or dare I say, Titans uniform and they win 12 or more games next season and most likely go deep into the playoffs.
The burden of victory is always placed on Manning (and only Manning) as long as he is a Colt. In the last several years, it would seem that Polian is not committed to fixing the defensive or offensive lines (can anyone explain cutting Ryan Lilja last season). Manning’s legacy with the Colts may ultimately be his ability to win on a team with no running game to speak of (at least in the last five seasons), defenses that have rarely, if ever, been able to get off the field in the second half of a meaningful game, and consistently poor special teams play. So if Manning is truly interested in winning another Super Bowl, wouldnt it have at least crossed his mind to leave the Colts for another team with solid skill players and a shut down defense? Manning will be the highest paid player in the NFL no matter where he plays. Just food for thought.

by First Sergeant on Jan 17, 2011 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake