2011 NFL Week Nine: Inside The Colts Numbers
As it's the time of year where all the trees in our yard become the bane of my existence, I was listening to the Q95 Pregame show Sunday morning while raking leaves and mowing the grass, and one part of the discussion really stuck out to me. The show features former QBs Jack Trudeau and Mark Herrmann, and they were asked to grade Colts QB Curtis Painter's play so far this season. As I listened to their answers, all I could think was They've actually watched the 2011 Colts, right?
They started by saying he hasn't gotten much help from the 'make-shift Offensive Line', doesn't have a consistent running game to help him out, and if only his receivers would 'make a few plays for him'. Then they finally talked about Painter's play, which they admitted wasn't great, but it seemed they went out of their way to not be critical of him, especially considering their excuses. As I've been saying for a few weeks now, the running game / Offensive Line are the only things the Colts have been good at consistently all year. (OK, there is one more, which we'll get into later).
Sunday's 31-7 slaughtering at the hands of the Falcons was just more of the same for the Colts offense, another putrid performance by everyone involved, and it starts with the Quarterback. We saw Painter get benched for Dan Orlovsky in the fourth quarter, and at some point, if they are playing to win every game, we may need to see a change earlier on in the game. Do I expect anything? Of course not. But the bye week could be a good time to let Orlovsky take more snaps and get a chance if Painter puts up another stinker next week.
You think the Colts can't play any worse than we've seen earlier this year? Let's dive into the numbers, and I'll show you just how bad the Offense was Sunday...
Non-Adjusted Stats for Week 9:
| Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Off/Def Above | Off/Def Below | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSR | 45.5% | 28 | 73.5% | 17 | N | Y | 6-0 |
| ANPY/A | 1.657 | 28 | 11.360 | 27 | N | Y | 7-0 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 16 | 1 | 14 | N | Y | 7-0 |
| Yds/Drive | 15.50 | 28 | 33.23 | 15 | N | Y | 4-1 |
| ToP/Drive | 1:51.2 | 28 | 2:54.3 | 16 | N | N | 5-2 |
| Yds/Play | 3.321 | 28 | 6.545 | 20 | N | Y | 4-3 |
| First Downs/Drive | 0.83 | 28 | 1.62 | 9 | N | N | 3-1 |
| 3rd/4th Down | 28.6% | 20 | 42.9% | 16 | N | Y | 4-0 |
| Avg Start Pos | 19.3 | 26 | 26.2 | 14 | N | N | 2-1 |
| 3 and Outs | 7 | 28 | 3 | 9 | N | Y | 5-1 |
| RZ Eff | 0.0% | 26 | 81.0% | 20 | N | Y | 7-4 |
| Plays/Drive | 4.667 | 28 | 5.077 | 6 | N | N | 3-2 |
| Penalty Yds / Play | 0.571 | 5 | 0.152 | 28 | N | N | 3-1 |
| RB Success | 35.0% | 23 | 60.0% | 25 | N | Y | 4-5 |
| Yds/Carry | 3.95 | 18 | 3.98 | 12 | N | N | 5-3 |
| Net Punts Yds/Game | 48.00 | 3 | 46.00 | 24 | N | N | 5-1 |
| Ranking - Week (28) | 28 | 18 | 28 | ||||
| Ranking - Season (260) | 257 | 199 | 255 | ||||
Adjusted Stats for Week 9:
| Statistic | Offense | Rank | Defense | Rank | Off/Def Above | Off/Def Below | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSR | 48.1% | 28 | 70.0% | 12 | N | Y | 6-0 |
| ANPY/A | 2.281 | 28 | 11.730 | 27 | N | Y | 7-0 |
| Turnovers | 1.5 | 17 | 1.2 | 16 | N | Y | 7-0 |
| Yds/Drive | 15.87 | 28 | 34.37 | 15 | N | Y | 4-1 |
| ToP/Drive | 1:50.7 | 28 | 2:39.2 | 13 | N | N | 5-2 |
| Yds/Play | 3.455 | 28 | 7.093 | 26 | N | Y | 4-3 |
| First Downs/Drive | 0.86 | 28 | 1.39 | 6 | N | N | 3-1 |
| 3rd/4th Down | 23.3% | 24 | 35.8% | 13 | N | Y | 4-0 |
| Avg Start Pos | 19.4 | 27 | 26.0 | 13 | N | N | 2-1 |
| 3 and Outs | 6.9 | 28 | 3.8 | 8 | N | Y | 5-1 |
| RZ Eff | 17.4% | 26 | 66.2% | 13 | N | Y | 7-4 |
| Plays/Drive | 4.591 | 27 | 4.691 | 1 | N | N | 3-2 |
| Penalty Yds / Play | 0.624 | 7 | 0.261 | 28 | N | N | 3-1 |
| RB Success | 37.2% | 22 | 64.7% | 27 | N | Y | 4-5 |
| Yds/Carry | 4.42 | 14 | 4.17 | 13 | N | N | 5-3 |
| Net Punts Yds/Game | 47.01 | 3 | 49.90 | 27 | N | N | 5-1 |
| Ranking - Week (28) | 28 | 15 | 28 | ||||
| Ranking - Season (260) | 255 | 170 | 254 | ||||
Some thoughts:
- I'm going to start with the Defense, as for the second week in a row they held their own despite the Offensive struggles they have to cover up week after week. They once again played right around the average in the NFL, which is saying something for being on the field so much.
- The defense actually got that Falcons off the field, doing well in First Downs per Drive, Third/Fourth Down Conversion Rate (where the Falcons had been excellent all year), and Three and Outs, forcing 3 of them Sunday.
- Obviously the biggest problem for the defense was giving up big plays in the passing game, which is why you see the bad numbers in ANPY/A and Yards per Play. Thankfully the Colts won't see Julio Jones for another four years.
- The lone bright spot for the Colts Offense was Punter Pat McAfee, who was outstanding. He's playing at a Pro Bowl level this season, and I hope he gets the recognition he deserves. The punt he pinned in the corner at the 1 was as perfect as you can get, and directly led to seven points, thanks to Jerraud Powers.
- Worst in the league this week in six of the top seven stats. This team should not be this bad. It really shouldn't. 16 Yards per Drive? Less than a First Down per Drive? Seven Three and Outs? Incredibly frustrating.
- The Running game also took a step back, although the Yards per Carry was decent. Hopefully we see it back to the level of previous game next week.
Season Stats through Week 9 (Adjusted):
| Statistic | Offense | Rank | Best | Defense | Rank | Best | Record | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSR | 59.6% | 31 | Packers | 73.6% | 30 | Ravens | 48-5 | 0.906 |
| ANPY/A | 4.211 | 27 | Packers | 8.079 | 32 | Jets | 60-11 | 0.845 |
| Turnovers | 2.09 | 23 | Lions | 1.13 | 29 | Packers | 55-14 | 0.797 |
| Yds/Drive | 21.98 | 31 | Eagles | 33.30 | 28 | Jaguars | 43-9 | 0.827 |
| ToP/Drive | 2:04.0 | 31 | Steelers | 3:02.0 | 29 | Bears | 58-10 | 0.853 |
| Yds/Play | 4.695 | 25 | Packers | 5.710 | 29 | Ravens | 42-11 | 0.792 |
| First Downs/Drive | 1.15 | 31 | Eagles | 1.89 | 27 | Bears | 41-14 | 0.745 |
| 3rd/4th Down | 32.2% | 24 | Saints | 45.9% | 32 | Jets | 52-12 | 0.813 |
| Avg Start Pos | 25.8 | 32 | 49ers | 33.1 | 27 | 49ers | 44-13 | 0.772 |
| 3 and Outs | 5.26 | 29 | Eagles | 3.38 | 22 | Lions | 41-13 | 0.759 |
| RZ Eff | 49.1% | 31 | Titans | 75.4% | 25 | Falcons | 50-19 | 0.725 |
| Plays/Drive | 4.769 | 32 | Saints | 5.751 | 22 | Bears | 34-16 | 0.680 |
| Penalty Yds / Play | 0.685 | 7 | Saints | 0.671 | 29 | Ravens | 34-28 | 0.548 |
| RB Success | 46.9% | 10 | Steelers | 50.7% | 30 | Seahawks | 32-29 | 0.525 |
| Yds/Carry | 4.41 | 9 | Eagles | 4.17 | 21 | Bengals | 35-29 | 0.547 |
| Net Punts Yds/Game | 38.57 | 15 | Saints | 39.74 | 26 | Bears | 34-26 | 0.567 |
| Overall | 31 | Packers | 32 | Ravens | ||||
A couple thoughts:
- Only Seattle's Offense is worse than the Colts, and they're getting dangerously close to passing them as well.
- Even though the Defense keeps improving, they still haven't surpassed the Titans yet, who are ranked 31st on Defense.
- Time of Possession per Drive is looking to be more important this season than in years past, while Turnovers aren't quite as important. Interesting to see.
Week by Week Comparisons:
| Colts | Opponent | Non-Adjusted | Adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Offense | Defense | Total | Offense | Defense | Total | |
| 1 | Texans | 221 | 193 | 242 | 177 | 148 | 189 |
| 2 | Browns | 207 | 173 | 225 | 238 | 227 | 252 |
| 3 | Steelers | 215 | 141 | 214 | 239 | 50 | 163 |
| 4 | Buccaneers | 187 | 221 | 239 | 221 | 229 | 248 |
| 5 | Chiefs | 80 | 249 | 193 | 92 | 260 | 238 |
| 6 | Bengals | 178 | 172 | 196 | 151 | 215 | 221 |
| 7 | Saints | 236 | 260 | 260 | 247 | 259 | 260 |
| 8 | Titans | 222 | 121 | 202 | 249 | 137 | 244 |
| 9 | Falcons | 257 | 199 | 255 | 255 | 170 | 254 |
Six games in the bottom 40 played so far this season by the Colts. The Offense has looked horrific for three straight weeks now, while the Defense hasn't played bad in two straight. The next two games will probably be the best chances for the Colts to win a game until Week 15 against the Titans. We'll find out what they have left in them.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for the great work again.
If the Colts could get just ONE game where both units played well together, they could actually win a game.
Interested to see that the turnover...
number hasn’t led to as many wins this year. It’s so foreign to what my mind see during games.
Bleedin' Blue for as long as I can remember. Can you believe we get to be fans while our team has the greatest QB of all time?!?!?!
QBs are a tight fraternity, so it doesn't surprise me they weren't too critical
I was one of those who thought Painter was going to be ok after his first couple of games, but it is painfully clear now that he is just aweful. If this team had AVERAGE starting QB play, along with a halfway decent secondary, this team wouldn’t look so terrible.
Whenever you get stressed, always remember: RDWHAHB
I did think the same thing
Especially for Herrmann, who played at Purdue as well. If they had done it without throwing the one aspect that is actually decent under the bus, I wouldn’t have minded it so much.
If the Colts had Matt Hasselbeck, they’d be exactly where the Titans are today. Not much difference otherwise.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
very true
with somone like Hasselbeck we’d probably have 2-3 wins
Whenever you get stressed, always remember: RDWHAHB
Poor Receiver play more of a reason than poor QB play
Painter has thrown a ton of catchable balls that have been dropped by Clark, Wayne, Collie, Tammie, etc. Strangely enough, the only guy who seems to be able to hold on to the ball this year is Garcon. I don’t think Painter was ‘benched’ for Orlavsky. I think the game was out of hand the Colts realized they couldn’t afford another injury at starting QB.
These receivers were catching these balls last year when Peyton was throwing to them. I think they have lost the passion and aren’t used to playing meaningless games. It’s a hard position to be put in and focusing is definitely more difficutly. It’s expecially hard when your team continually coughs up the ball on their opening drive of the game…
"It's about the journey--mine and yours--and the lives we can touch, the legacy we can leave, and the world we can change for the better."
— Tony Dungy
The receivers have also talked about the difference in the throws from the two quarterbacks.
I don’t know how much validity to that there is, but it’s a factor.
by James Broschat on Nov 8, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
I've noticed since Painters first game
that he fires the damned ball too hard on short stuff. There is no need to rifle a 3-5 yard pass. If it needs to be rifled, then your shoving the ball some place it shouldn’t go.
if Bill Polian is coming out
saying Painter didnt play well I’m sure he was benched.
I think both injury and sucking came into play and they just figured why not try Orlovsky whats left to screw up and if he does worse then at last Painter is rested for the next loss.
While the receivers arent playing great this year they have done more with the ball than Painter especially Garcon with the yards after catch.
Also Painter doesnt seem to lay the passes in there like Manning i wouldnt be surprised if he was bruising some hands by trying to rocket it in their every time
It's a shame you have to put so much work into showing us
what SUCK looks like.

































