Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

2011 NFL Week Seventeen Preview: Indianapolis Colts At Jacksonville Jaguars

INDIANAPOLIS, IN - NOVEMBER 13:  Austin Collie #17 of the Indianapolis Colts runs with the ball while defended by Paul Posluszny #51 of the Jacksonville Jaguars at Lucas Oil Stadium on November 13, 2011 in Indianapolis, Indiana. The Jaguars won 17-3.  (Photo by Andy Lyons/Getty Images)

The long, excruciating, and dreadful 2011 NFL season has reached its final week for the Indianapolis Colts. Over the past two weeks, however, the time between games hasn't been nearly has noticeable, as the Blue Horseshoe have pulled off consecutive wins after losing their first 13, showing that they still know how to do that winning thing. In doing so, however, they've split the fan base once again, much like they did in 2009.

After beating the Texans last Thursday night, and with the Rams losing on Sunday, this Sunday's game in Jacksonville has led to a dichotomy of opinion on whether the Colts should try to win the game. With the Rams playing the 49ers, who are trying to clinch a first round bye in the Playoffs and sit at 12-3, it's certainly unlikely the Rams will help all Colts fans by winning, making the result of the Colts game irrelevant. Which means, just like those last two weeks in 2009, a decision has to be made on how to play the game.

I'm not going to use this game preview to debate what the Colts should do, but I will point out that if the Colts want to be consistent with their messaging from 2009, they would play their second team for most of the game. If the only thing that matters is winning Super Bowls, which was their reasoning two years ago, then securing the #1 overall pick, regardless of whether Andrew Luck is actually selected, puts the team in a better position to win the Super Bowl going forward. I don't agree with this line of thinking, but if they are going to be consistent, this should be how they play this Sunday in Jacksonville.

The Jaguars are a disappointing 4-11, fired Jack Del Rio weeks ago, and have lost five of the six games since they beat the Colts back in early November. In that one win over Tampa Bay, they forced seven turnovers and scored two defensive touchdowns, rattling off 41 straight points after being down 14-0 early on. I'm not sure what their level of motivation will be either, as allowing the Colts to get the #1 overall pick is probably not in the best interests of a team that competes with them twice every year. They also haven't shown many signs of life after Mel Tucker took over, so I can't see them playing lights out to keep him as their Head Coach.

What do the numbers have to say about these two teams that could both be picking in the top 5 next season? Let's take a look...

Star-divide

Adjusted Statistical Comparison between Colts and Jaguars:

Statistic Colts Jaguars
Offense Rank Defense Rank Offense Rank Defense Rank
DSR 62.1% 29 72.4% 26 60.8% 32 64.2% 5
ANPY/A 4.335 27 6.743 30 2.829 32 5.132 8
Turnovers 1.97 23 1.29 28 1.75 17 1.83 15
Yds/Drive 23.65 28 30.66 22 20.74 32 24.79 3
ToP/Drive 2:18.0 32 2:59.0 31 2:34.0 24 2:34.0 12
Yds/Play 4.694 27 5.310 23 3.965 32 4.812 6
First Downs/Drive 1.32 31 1.83 25 1.28 32 1.34 3
3rd/4th Down 34.7% 24 45.2% 30 34.1% 26 33.8% 4
Avg Start Pos 26.7 32 33.1 29 30.9 15 32.4 25
3 and Outs 5.21 30 3.46 23 5.12 29 5.09 3
RZ Eff 53.7% 30 76.5% 31 58.7% 28 70.6% 26
Plays/Drive 5.095 29 5.735 25 5.301 22 5.072 3
Penalty Yds / Play 0.544 2 0.756 28 0.671 5 0.936 5
RB Success 42.5% 25 47.9% 22 46.5% 13 39.5% 3
Yds/Carry 4.19 12 4.02 14 4.04 19 3.75 5
Net Punts Yds/Game 38.19 18 40.19 28 36.43 26 40.62 30
Overall 30 30 32 7

Keys to the Game:

  • The Colts Defense has been playing like a completely new unit the past two weeks, and they will get one of the worst offenses in the NFL to feast on this week. Being on the road might make a difference, but we should expect the same level of play we've seen each of the past two weeks out of the Colts Defense.
  • The Drive-related stats show the Jaguars really have a hard time moving the ball, ranking dead last in a bunch of those stats. The first time around they only managed three drives (out of 11) for more than 30 yards, with the killer being a 16 play, 85 yard TD drive in the third quarter, eating up almost 10 minutes of the clock. If we see a drive like that this week, it's probably bad news for the Colts.
  • The Jaguars are pretty poor in the Red Zone as well, so if they happen to get there, the Colts need to keep them out of the end zone, as that is what most other teams have done.
  • Arian Foster had a big day last week despite the Defense playing so well overall. I expect to see a few big gashes by Maurice Jones-Drew, but also expect to see him get bottled up on occasion too. If those big gashes are TD runs, it'll be bad news for the Colts.
  • The Jaguars defense looks really good overall, but they haven't been so great since Del Rio was fired, only playing well in that Tampa game. They've also played much, much better at home, making the task a little taller for the Colts Offense.
  • The Colts will have to take advantage of their Red Zone trips, as the Jaguars have really struggled with that all year. However, the Colts haven't been so great inside the 20, especially coming off last week where they could only manage one TD in five trips. For the Colts to win, they'll need to cash in with 7 points rather than 3.
  • The Colts will also have to not turn the ball over, as Jacksonville is about league-average when it comes to forcing turnovers. If you take out that Tampa game they forced seven of them, they have 18 turnovers in 14 games, which isn't that great. I actually fear a Dan Orlovsky sack-fumble more than I do an interception.
  • If the Colts can move the ball consistently like they did last week against the Texans, they'll have a great chance of winning. The Jaguars have been good in the drive-related stats, again especially at home, so it'll be a little tougher going than last week, although the Texans defense is slightly better than the defense they'll face on Sunday.
  • The Jaguars have benefited from very few penalties called against them, and quite a few called on their opponents. This shouldn't be the case this week, as the Colts haven't had many penalties called on them this year. I don't expect penalties to play a big part in the game.
  • Want a bold prediction? We'll see a punt returned for a touchdown by the Colts. Don't know if it'll be Pierre Garcon or Joe Lefeged, but I think it'll happen this week.

My opinion is that teams should try to win each and every week, and I believe right now, the Colts are the better team. Obviously that doesn't mean that the Colts will win, but seeing how these teams have played as of late gives the impression the Colts should win. I believe both teams will be playing like it is Week 1, and I think the Colts will come out on top, and they'll get the #2 overall pick, something I thought almost impossible three weeks ago. The players don't care about draft picks, as they just want to win. The Colts will do just that on Sunday.

Colts 20, Jaguars 16

Comment 69 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Quite a dilemma.....

Regardless, I wan’t a win. Draft wise, we are in good shape with one or two. But, I do hope the Rams win. Not likely though.

by tim55 on Dec 29, 2011 10:57 AM EST reply actions  

a win means nothing

so it will really suck to win. It’s not like it raises the players confidence that they would end the season with a three game winning streak to build on. Obviously none of the players or coaches are playing to lose and I don’t think that will be the case from Jacksonville either even if they don’t want us getting luck. It’s only fans that think this way and possibly some owners/GM’s (specifically Polian and Irsay no matter what any tweet says).

It’s already tough for the Colts to beat Jacksonville anyway. I just hope it’s out of hand in favor of the Jags early so I don’t even have to think about not cheering for Reggie Wayne to score a TD again. I was torn and ultimately I just couldn’t do it.

by Boiler00 on Dec 29, 2011 11:23 AM EST reply actions  

This is professional football..........

You ALWAYS play for a win. With your logic, once you are mathematically out of the playoffs, then you should try to manipulate your record to produce the best draft position……I don’t think so. If a team I am a fan of deliberately tries to lose a game for draft position, then I will find another team who plays with pride to support.

by tim55 on Dec 29, 2011 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed

unfortunately like i believe no player likes to lose, but Front Office is questionable. If for some reason the key players are pulled at all during this game look for the NFL to investigate.

by kbreboot on Dec 29, 2011 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I totally agree with you all

I never said they should play to lose and I don’t want to see them play to lose. I’m only hoping they lose in this scenario we’ve been dealt this year for long term implications. It’s pretty simple really. You can’t tell me you’d be happier to be 3-13 in 2011 and have Matt Kahlil with an unknown QB replacement in a few years for Manning over being 2-14 in 2011 and having the chance to see what Luck can do over the next 10+ years.

by Boiler00 on Dec 29, 2011 4:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Will Brad be consistant too?

I realize Matt wrote this article, but I’m curious that if the Colts intentionally lose this game, will Brad be consistant and rip into the front office for doing so like last time?

I think it’s pretty obvious the situations are clearly different. First of all, Colts didn’t ‘throw’ the game against the Jets. They took players out that gave them the best chance to win. They still played to win, but put resting players over winning.

In this scenario you are talking about pulling players to intentionally lose, which is unethical and diminishes and undermines the game of football. If the Colts have respect for the game of football, and I’m pretty certain they do, they will give it their all to win Sunday.

There are no guarantees with football. Picking #2 and not getting Andrew Luck could also turn out to be a blessing if Andrew Luck turns out to be a monumental bust or suffers a severe injury early in his playing career. For his sake I’m hoping neither are true, but the commitment to winning football games is more important than any single player.

"It's about the journey--mine and yours--and the lives we can touch, the legacy we can leave, and the world we can change for the better."
— Tony Dungy

by Mark Olson on Dec 29, 2011 11:48 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

this is all very true
but the commitment to winning football games is more important than any single player.

it is more important but the combination of one guy whether it be Manning or what Luck may be able to do combined with the commitment would be the ultimate combo.

I would never cheer for a team that plays to lose. And this team will never play to lose as expected they wouldn’t. But as a longterm, diehard fan I’m only hoping they lose more games (or the same as St. Louis) than any other team since the point where we couldn’t possibly make the playoffs.

by Boiler00 on Dec 29, 2011 4:52 PM EST up reply actions  

a little different this time

because you pretty much have backups in there anyway.. There is no manning, clark, and any IR starters to pull from the game. No excuses they need to play it out. Play to WIN!

by kbreboot on Dec 29, 2011 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Regardless of who the Colts would run out there

They’ll never, ever play to lose, no matter what it gains them. Those players will play as hard as they can and to the best of their ability, so this sentence wouldn’t be true at all:

In this scenario you are talking about pulling players to intentionally lose

But I don’t see how pulling starters Sunday, with the ultimate goal of winning the Super Bowl, is any different than pulling starters in 2009, with the ultimate goal of winning the Super Bowl.

They took players out that gave them the best chance to win.

If they are to be consistent, that’s exactly what they should do. However, I don’t believe they will.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Dec 29, 2011 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Orlovsky’s wife just had triplets,, he should stay at home and help her this Sunday and bond with his triplets!!!! Start CP and start and play guys who normally wouldn’t get to play!!! They may find someone who can help them next year!!!! and try some plays they normally wouldn’t do. They should try to win , bit win with the 2nd, 3rd and 4th stringers just like they did when they pulled Peyton in 2009. WE NEED 2-14 and the POWER of the # 1 pick, not 3-13 that no one will care whether they won the last game abd blow the #1 PICK!!!!

by OBGYNOSUPREME on Dec 29, 2011 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

This I can agree with

Putting in players that aren’t the best at their position to evaluate talent is still different to me than pulling your best with the intention of losing the game. It would be hard to know which is going on, but I still want a win.

"It's about the journey--mine and yours--and the lives we can touch, the legacy we can leave, and the world we can change for the better."
— Tony Dungy

by Mark Olson on Dec 30, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Pulling players to preserve player health is ethical in my opinion

Pulling players to lose a game and skip ahead of another team in the draft is unethical. The line I’ve heard that most clearly defends my point is,

Why don’t teams intentionally lose every game after being ruled out of the playoffs?

Another comparison would be someone who intentionally misses work or takes a lower paying job in order to qualify for public benefits. I’m not going to try and convince anyone of what is right and wrong here. Your ethics are your own and as long as you hold yourself to the same standards as others, you can make decisions however you choose.

"It's about the journey--mine and yours--and the lives we can touch, the legacy we can leave, and the world we can change for the better."
— Tony Dungy

by Mark Olson on Dec 30, 2011 1:15 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

he wont

but i would be happy to let everyone know what is right or wrong.

by omahacolt on Dec 30, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Hahahahaha

Out of all of the discussions you and I have had. This was your best reply EVER

"It's about the journey--mine and yours--and the lives we can touch, the legacy we can leave, and the world we can change for the better."
— Tony Dungy

by Mark Olson on Dec 30, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with your feelings

I don’t think teams should do anything except try, to the best of their ability, to win every game they play. I understand the argument of sitting starters in both a winning and losing scenario, but don’t agree with it.

I still think if the stated goal is winning the Super Bowl, which the Colts Front Office has said over and over, losing this one game gives the Colts a better opportunity to do so. It’s much different than intentionally losing 5 or 6 games after being eliminated from the playoffs, as teams owe it to the rest of the league to continue playing with that many games left.

One game, against another team that has nothing else to play for, is equivalent to Week 17 in 2009 against the Bills. I hope they play to win. They should just be ready to answer why they did after continually sitting players in “meaningless” games in prior years.

Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.

by mgrex03 on Dec 31, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

All I know is

The Jaguars better fucking tank this game. With how the Colts tanked the entire season, them not having the number one selection would just be icing.

Manning will only be around half a season next year any way, as mahine like he has been the neck injury will be the end.

Lets Go goldilocks keep your sucking routine up

Division Champion Houston Texans
Hi My name is Jack, why don't you help me off?

by WreckNTexan on Dec 29, 2011 1:32 PM EST reply actions  

misinformation.

The only thing we know is Manning had a major surgery to fuse his neck. No one but Manning knows his condition. Chances are Front Office would want the world to think the worst, makes the draft look more interesting in terms of trading. There are a lot of ifs and buts, but one thing is for certain, Manning wants to play and he by far is the smartest of players to play the game, he’ll find a way back to form and maybe not throw nearly as much to prolong his career.

by kbreboot on Dec 29, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Not mis information

Just plain sprewage. I just don’t want the Colts to get away with high way robbery, I only hope the players concises come into play

Division Champion Houston Texans
Hi My name is Jack, why don't you help me off?

by WreckNTexan on Dec 29, 2011 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Not only does a win cause them to lose Luck,

but it may secure Caldwell’s job. It’s double jeopardy to win.

by JG23 on Dec 29, 2011 2:39 PM EST reply actions  

I really really really really really hope that is not true

The chiefs fired their coach, same with the dolphins and they have a better record than the colts. I hope Irsay realizes that Caldwell is not the coach of the future for the colts.

by fanatik on Dec 29, 2011 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

not much luck.

If manning comes back, Caldwell will keep his job. Caldwell had to deal with the worst this season, much of it not his decision. I doubt he wanted Kerry Collins as a starter, having only weeks to get him up to speed. Anyway reason why i say Caldwell Stays if Manning stays is that Manning will need the freedom to do as he does. What really needs to change is the Defensive scheme. Tampa2 is getting old, They need to blitz

by kbreboot on Dec 29, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

More than blitz, Blitz effectively

I may be wrong, but when the colts blitz, they don’t get to the QB, and that allows for 3rd down conversions, and big plays down the field.

by fanatik on Dec 29, 2011 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Best case scenario for me

is for both the Colts and the Rams to win.
Second best is a Colts win.

I will never root for my Colts to lose. I don’t care about luck – I want skilled players!

by Peter Storgaard on Dec 29, 2011 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, this is the optimal desire

even for thsoe who dotn want to get rid of Manning, teh # pick this year coulg get us soem really good picks, or a QBof the future

Go Blue!

Revenue - Expenses = Profit

by dezznutz1001 on Dec 29, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

#1 pick^

Go Blue!

Revenue - Expenses = Profit

by dezznutz1001 on Dec 29, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

But would Polian trade the #1 pick?

It kind of seems to me that Polian wants Luck, which means if the colts get it, they will most likely not trade the 1 pick.

by fanatik on Dec 29, 2011 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Polians are devious

They may want you and the rest of the league believe they want #1 overall. But in reality #1 pick if we were to take LUCK, will not fill the needs of the team. Colts have problems on Defense, just look back at the KC and Tampa game. There is a more than 50/50 chance that Polians Trade for future 1st round picks (if manning is healthy). This season is evidence alone that having a sole talent the likes of manning go down could bring the whole season to an end. I would rather be at the patriots level when brady went down they still posted 10+ wins with Cassel. Testament to coaching, talent evaluation and schemes. This is a team game and one player can’t win it all, Manning had consecutive playoff appearance with only one SB ring to show for it.

by kbreboot on Dec 29, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree - win is first priority

Fill the holes on the defense is the next one.

by kbreboot on Dec 29, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Milestones to get

Pierre Garcon is at 925 yards receiving and Reggie Wayne is at 887 yards receiving, what are the odds that Orlovsky looks towards them for them to get that goal on Sunday? Pretty high, IMO.

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=0011&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&season=2011&seasonType=REG&experience=null&tabSeq=0&qualified=true&Submit=Go

Maurice Jones Drew is ahead of LeSean McCoy by 128 yards for the rushing title. Chances are, he is gunning for at least another 100 plus yards to put the rushing title a bit out of reach

We will be throwing a lot in this game to exploit the banged up Jags secondary and the Jags will be running a lot. Colts 27 Jags 20

by chad72 on Dec 29, 2011 7:27 PM EST reply actions  

Having said that...

…even with Peyton, the Jags have fought us hard. If both teams play hard, could it be deja vu with Josh Scobee kicking a game winning FG again??? Let me change that score to 27-24 Jags.

by chad72 on Dec 29, 2011 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

HOPE U ARE RIGHT !!!!!

START CP or let him see alot of action as this will be his last game as a pro. Orlovsky should be at home with his new triplets!!! A free game to evaluate some possible untapped hidden talent!!!!!! 2-14 and the POWER of the #1 pick, 3-13 is toatlly useless!!!!

by OBGYNOSUPREME on Dec 29, 2011 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

This time

It would be Scobee kicking a 61 yd FG for the win. It will be good

It's All good!

by Hurricane8765 on Dec 30, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

GO MJD

hope he goes for 200 yards,, the one time in my life willbe rooting for him to have a big game against the Colts. And it would be tragic to have someone good get hurt this game in the 2nd half!!!! Starters should sit the 2nd half JUST like 2009!!!! You think Minn is happy about AP – he got hurt in a worthless game.

by OBGYNOSUPREME on Dec 29, 2011 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

We're going to loose anyway

We will play to win, but I doubt we score more than 10 points in the entire game. The Jags defense is actually quite good and it’s in Jacksonville.

by Coltsfan1345 on Dec 29, 2011 11:07 PM EST reply actions  

Why even effing bother, then? Huh?

OK, what, in your vast wealth of professional sorts knowledge, should be done in the future in order to prevent those nasty, burdensome wins? Maybe next time when we’re mathematically eliminated we should just hang up the cleats altogether. “Thanks, fans, for your support, but we’re just gonna go ahead and tap out now. Better draft position, you know?” Even better – we knew we were screwed when Manning was benched, so why even run the risk of injuries to anyone and just sit out the whole damned season?

Call me Polyanna. Call me naive. Call me whatever the hell you want – I like it when my team wins. That is the point now, and all it has ever been – to win the next game. I was pissed off two years ago when they spat in our faces by not trying to win, and I would feel the same way now. It’s called integrity – doing the right thing even when it benefits you not to.

The one thing this team controls for sure right now is how they play Sunday. They didn’t fuse Peyton’s neck. They can’t control whether Luck will be worth a shit or not. They don’t even know whether they will have a contract next year or not. When Jeff Saturday is sitting on the couch next fall, when Reggie is toiling in obscurity for the Raiders or Chiefs or whatever shitty team picks him up as a free agent, I’m sure they’re gonna be real happy that their legacy with one of the most consistently successful franchises in NFL history ended with them sipping Gatorade on the bench, all for the chance to see whether a 50-50 shot (and that is, when you get right down to it, exactly what Luck is) panned out at quarterback.

by HoosierDammit on Dec 30, 2011 3:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Sorry, Coltsfan,

This was directed at the previous poster, not you. My bad.

by HoosierDammit on Dec 30, 2011 3:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Excellent strategy

…That is the point now, and all it has ever been – to win the next game

Then is the apporoach the Colts should always take, with no exceptions.
That means preseason and regular season, with absolutely no exceptions.
Just pretend that this is a vital game coming up with Jacksonville, a must win situation.
It has playoff implications written all over it.
Going 3-13 is much more important than thinking about how to win in 2012.
Planning ahead and thinking is overrated anyway.
There is absolutey no reason to think a first pick in EVERY round of the draft is any more valuable than the second pick. None whatsoever.

by centauri on Dec 30, 2011 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

fairweather fan^

Go Blue!

Revenue - Expenses = Profit

by dezznutz1001 on Dec 31, 2011 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh yeah

And did everyone forget how bad we are. Because that’s the way it seems. 2 weeks ago it was a given that we were going 0-16. 2 home games doesn’t make a season. We aren’t a good team, unfortunately, the Jaguars are a better team and playing in their own house going for the divisional sweep against us. Sure I could see us winning, but we haven’t won a road game all season and I don’t see us winning one now. It’ll definitely be a close game, but I see the score being 13-10 Jaguars. Whether that’s good or bad is for us to debate. I would love to get Luck, but I wouldn’t be unhappy if we got the #2 pick and settled for Kalil or Claiborne. With Manning coming back, those two players fill greater needs anyway (assuming Manning does come back).

by Coltsfan1345 on Dec 29, 2011 11:11 PM EST reply actions  

More bad news -

Bradford is out for the Rams, so Rams will NOT be winning. Thus, it basically comes down to whether we win or lose.

As for me, I think a second pick is so so so much better than where we’ve picked before that it will not matter much. I also think Manning will be back with a vengeance. I’d like us to get him some WR’s, grabs some great corner guys and a safety. With Brown doing better, Tamme out there in place of Clark, it should be a good year.

by buymymonkey on Dec 30, 2011 12:09 AM EST reply actions  

lol

tamme isnt beating out clark

brown might not make the team

by omahacolt on Dec 30, 2011 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm glad I could bring some joy to you!

Not yet Tamme isn’t, you’re right. I don’t agree about Brown.

by buymymonkey on Dec 30, 2011 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Why would Brown not make the team?

by Coltsfan1345 on Dec 30, 2011 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Are we really back on this again..dude give it up

Evans is not going to be a starter over Brown..and it’s a dumb ass argument anyway, we play all three backs and our three backs all have different skills that help the team.

by armycolts25 on Dec 30, 2011 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

ok

but brown doesnt have so much talent that he isnt at risk of being cut. his draft status is the only thing that keeps him somewhat secure

by omahacolt on Dec 30, 2011 8:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Go Rams. Nuff said.

Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy

by zherebyonki on Dec 30, 2011 5:31 AM EST reply actions  

I'm shocked, appalled and abashed.

…and you call yourself a Colts’ fan. ;-)

by Ayrshire on Dec 30, 2011 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, the Jaguars are dealing with a lot of injuries. 31 on injured reserve. Most of them are on the defensive side. They are: Matt Roth SE, John Chick DE, Kyle Bosworth, Clint Session LB (If I’m correct, Session is a former Cult) Aaron Kampman DE, Derek Cox CB, William Middlton CB (Cox’ replacement), Rashean Mathis CB, Ashton Youboty CB (Mathis’ replacement); just to name a few. I have 4 bold preditions.

1. Cecil Shorts III will return a punt for Touchdown.
2. Maurice Jones-Drew will get 150 rushing yards, plus a touchdown.
3. Montell Owens will bust out a 20-35 yard run setting the Jags up with 1st & Goal inside the 5.
4. On the next play, DuJuan Harris (a running Back that we promoted from the practice squad for the San Diego game) will get his 1st touchdown of his career.

It's All good!

by Hurricane8765 on Dec 30, 2011 1:57 PM EST reply actions  

Make that 5 Bold Predictions

5. Scobee will kick a 61 yard FG that will be straight down the middle of the posts.

It's All good!

by Hurricane8765 on Dec 30, 2011 2:04 PM EST reply actions  

Sorry about that.

Here’s a sixth. Pat McAfee (who will be put in just to see what he can do) will show Scobee up with a 70 yarder.

by HellaColts on Dec 30, 2011 7:45 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I don’t really know who McAfee is, but I do know that up to this point, Scobee’s stats for the season are: 18/20, 55 is his season long, and he is 100% on extra points. No blocked FGs. He had two 54yder and a 51yder against the ravens. He typically nails it dead straight through the middle of the posts even on both sides. He doesn’t choke under Pressure, either. He had a 59yder last against you guys to win 31-28. What are McAfee’s stats for the season? What was his longest FG ever?

It's All good!

by Hurricane8765 on Dec 30, 2011 10:20 PM EST up reply actions  

He is our punter.

There are some YouTube vids floating around of some 70 yd fgs he kicked at practice.

by Odin1980 on Dec 31, 2011 2:51 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I wasn't being completely serious.

McAfee has never actually kicked a field goal in a game, he’s our punter and kickoff guy (although someone told me he wants to take over FGs after vinatieri hangs it up) But he has a MASSIVE leg, and there are those videos Odin mentioned. I’m surprised you don’t know about McAfee, considering the Colts offense during the first time the two teams met this year you must have seen him 45 times.

by HellaColts on Dec 31, 2011 7:49 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

LET him try some 65-70 yarders

why not to see if he can do it , this is the perfect game to do it ,, who cares if he doesn’t make them and if he does we have a secret weapon for next year!!!!

by OBGYNOSUPREME on Dec 31, 2011 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Indianapolis Colts, 2006 NFL Champions!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

B1_small
Colts.com Reworks Roster
Nerds2
Andrew Luck Failing to Meet Expectations and Five Other Predictions
1565007530_small
Devil's Take - Colts Misconceptions and Issues

Recent FanPosts

Small
Three Big needs with possible answers
Small
National Football Posts's "Impact Rookies"
Small
Gonzo
Images_small
Colts Trade Chris Gronkowski for CB Cassius Vaughn
Image_small
Biggest Colts Changes
Houston_texans_v_indianapolis_colts_-o3ldozy6pvl_small
Announcement about research project involving StampedeBlue
Indianapolis-colts_small
New defensive scheme: Will it help or hurt the Colts?
B1_small
Two Nuggets from the Official Roster
Harbaugh_1_small
Where does "Mr. Irsay" rank?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Writer, Editor-In-Chief

Stampedeblue_small Brad Wells

Mgrex03_avatar_small mgrex03

Contributing Writers

Colts_small emiller17

Photo_small nopuntintended

Dmb33rrr_small Stew Blake