2011 NFL Mock Draft: Colts Flirt With Stephen Paea Once Again
Happy Monday! Here's another mock draft from Brian Galliford at SB Nation. And with the No. 22 pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Indianapolis Colts are taking a tackle. Shocking, I know.
22. Indianapolis Colts: Stephen Paea, DT, Oregon State. It's the perfect year for the Colts to finally upgrade their always-in-flux defensive tackle position. Paea is a brute, but also a rock solid athlete that could play one-technique or three-technique for Indy.
Should the Colts draft Paea, I'd think he'd be used more as the one-tech. Guys like Daniel Muir and Fili Moala may be below average tackles, but they can do the job (aka, suck less than normal) playing three-technique. As a 'nose tackle' in the Tampa-2, both Moala and Muir stink. Look no further than the last few games of the season, including the playoff loss to the Jets.
We brought this stat up as the regular season closes, but we'll bring it up again for clarity sake. For much of the 2010 season, Fili Moala and Daniel Muir were the starting DTs. On opening day, the decision to start Moala came as a surprise for many of us.
Needless to say, both Moala and Muir sucked as starting tackles.
Their inept play contributed to the Colts surrendering an appalling 1,713 yards rushing on 354 carries at 4.8 yards a carry. Anyone thinking a Colts team can win a Super Bowl with rushing stats THAT BAD is living in a fantasy world. And unlike 2006, there was no Bob Sanders or Rob Morris to swoop in and erase the mistakes of the DTs.
However, after the Dallas Cowboys game, in which the Colts surrendered 217 rushing yards at home, the Colts benched Muir and finally started Antonio Johnson once again. 'Mookie,' as we all know him, was the team's best DT in 2009. He was also the best DT we had in 2010, but for some stupid reason Jim Caldwell wouldn't play him. Speculation swirled that he was hurt, but since Mookie never appeared on the injury report, he wasn't hurt (if he was, and the Colts didn't report it, that makes them cheaters).
With Mookie reinserted as a starter, the Colts went 4-0 to close out their season. During that stretch of games, they allowed 371 rushing yards on 92 carries at 4 yards a carry. That's 92 rushing yards a game compared to the 143 yards a game surrendered from Week One to Thirteen.
Despite a revolving door at linebacker and in the secondary, the Colts run defense was very respectable during that four game stretch. A big reason why was Mookie. His rock solid play at the NT position in the Tampa-2 allowed Moala to look less pathetic than he normally plays.
However, during Week Seventeen against the Titans, Mookie got hurt. He did not play the following week against the Jets in the playoffs, and the result was a Jets win behind 169 rushing yards (4.4 a carry). Daniel Muir and Fili Moala started that game, and as they had done from Weeks One to Thirteen, they stunk up the place.
As high a priority as a left tackle (or any offensive linemen) is, DT is a very close second on the Colts draft needs list. If Indy trots out Fili Moala and Daniel Muir again as their starting tackles in 2011, it simply isn't worth paying attention to this team. The over-used Albert Einstein quote (Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results) is appropriate when discussing the Colts defensive tackle weaknesses and management's 'efforts' to correct them. Muir and Moala are terrible. Expecting them both to 'get good' in time for 2011 is not a realistic expectation. Both are serviceable back-ups. Not starters.
Someone like Stephen Paea at least as the potential to be a solid starter. Moala's and Muir's potential is tapped out. 4.8 a carry is who they are.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Moala + Mookie with some Foster sprinkled in = solid enough
Now I don’t doubt that the Colts will take a DT at some point in the draft and I won’t be against it when they do, but I feel like our D-line could easily be mediocre come the start of the season (whenever that may be). Moala seems to be steadily improving and Mookie is a badass when healthy. Foster, as we all know, is good for 2 amazing plays per game.
"It's an easy game, man. Easy game."
~Edgerrin James
by 87 Rides A Surfboard on Mar 28, 2011 12:28 PM EDT reply actions
Mookie had knee surgery after the Redskins game
He was hurt – check your facts.
That said, if the Colts don’t retain him and expect Muir to play the 1-tech role, it is QUITE dumb.
Mookie
He had his starting job taken from him in Week One. The Redskins game was Week Eight, I believe.
Please ease up on the ‘check your facts’ comments. Facts were checked. Facts were accurate. Mookie lost his job in Week One for reasons that had nothing to do with injury.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.
I thought Moala was decent...
I don’t get much into the specifics with DT’s (although I think Muir was dreadful), but Moala at least seemed to play fairly well most of the season.
He may not make a ton of tackles, or tackles for loss…but he was constantly in the backfield to disrupt running plays. And consider that he’s only played in the NFL for 2 years. He really didn’t see the field as a rookie, and improved a ton to his 2nd year. If he can continue to improve, he could be a very solid DT.
I like the idea of Mookie + Moala + 3rd rounder Sinoe Fua or Jarvis Jenkins.
Moala was fine..
Much improved from his first year, this article equating Muir with Moala isn’t fair at all.
Antoine Bethea - the most underrated safety in the NFL.
Agreed.
"I suppose that writers should, in a way, feel flattered by the censorship laws. They show a primitive fear and dread at the fearful magic of print." - John Mortimer
"I don't know who bacon is"
RIP bloodninja, NCO, and YeahItsDanny
by JesusNinja13 on Mar 28, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Based on.... what?
It isn’t fair… how?
Because you say so? Because Bill Polian gushes over Moala? Because you like the way both men dress on a Saturday night?
It isn’t fair to posting defensive stats for when Moala and Muir are in as opposed to Mookie?
EXPLAIN why the article isn’t fair. Don’t just say it isn’t fair’ and expect any one of us (aside from JesusNinja13, who only recs comments that disagree with me) to take you seriously.
Moala and Muir sucked in 2010. Stats back that up. The ‘eye ball’ test backs that up. Even other websites that follow players by watching film thinks they sucked.
If you think it’s unfair to simply call them out on their sucking, then you have a pretty warped idea of what ‘fairness’ is. If Moala and Muir are being unfairly judged, EXPLAIN WHY. Don’t just say it isn’t fair, and then leave it at that. That adds nothing here, and you’re better than that.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.
I was a little shocked at the fact that Fili Moala had 0 tackles for loss and 0 sacks.
I liked Muir though at 3-technique in 2009. He was a beast aside our other DT (I’m guessing it was Mookie) that year. Please quit frieken bashing frieking players who frieken play out of frieken position. He may suck at 1-tech DT but that’s not the case for 3-tech DT.
by RamblinWreck7 on Mar 28, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Fili
He was drafted to play 1-tech.
Regardless, THANK YOU! This was a good comment. This person actually provided a reason that the criticism might be unfair. It’s a flawed reasoning (if Fili is only ‘good’ only when Mookie plays next to him, then Fili isn’t all that good), but at least it’s something.
Again, thank you.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.
I was talking about Daniel Muir in the 3-tech 1-tech thing but thanks.
by RamblinWreck7 on Mar 28, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Muir
Ugh. Muir playing 1-tech is about as effective is ME playing the 1-tech. And we tendered him. Double ugh.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.
Sorry for re-posting this... but I replied to the wrong person
I actually found an article claiming Moala to be one of the “under tackle” 3-tech’s fighting for a starting job…
I didn’t have to go far to find it.
I’ll highlight the pertinent info from the link…
Moala was drafted specifically to play (and start) as the three technique under tackle in the Colts defense. Anything less means he is a bust, and a waste of a first day pick.
Peyton Manning = GFQTWHESINTHOEF
by coltsjunkie44 on Mar 30, 2011 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
In another thread you effectively said...
You don’t care what the stats said – you didn’t need stats to tell you that Kelvin Hayden isn’t a good CB, and that Tryon & Powers are our best CB’s.
I agree with that thought – but don’t bash someone else for having the same line of thinking in another thread about a different position.
DT’s are a difficult position to “quantify” since a great play by a DT doesn’t necessarily show up in the stat sheet. I can recall numerous plays in which Moala was 3 yards deep into the backfield – rerouting the RB just after he received the handoff. Moala needs to improve on finishing those plays, but most of the time they lead to a minimal/no gain when some1 else gets the tackle. Moala definitely needs to improve on finishing plays, but given how much he progressed from year 1 (riding the bench) to year 2 (being an impact starter), I do like the prospects of him very much.
by kmbryant09 on Mar 29, 2011 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec Rec Rec'd
The Hayden article reference is a good example of the trend of SB lately.
Moala played much better this year than anybody expected and I also remember numerous times when he would be causing the RB to change directions suddenly. And BBS, how do you know Moala was brought in to be a 1-tech? Do you have a link or any proof of this or is it just simply your assumption? I saw him as a 3-tech from the day the Colts drafted him… he isn’t especially big for a DT and he’s a fairly fast guy. People were knocking him on the technical aspects of his game, but that’s why he didn’t get much time on the field in his first year… you can’t deny that the offseasons in Indy have helped him in this regard significantly.
And he probably plays better with Mookie next to him because Mookie is a better player than Muir… DT’s work in tandem to be completely effective, thus is the 1-tech isn’t eating up the blocks and holding the line like he should, a quicker 3-tech guy like Moala will obviously struggle a bit in his game.
On a side note: Please don’t attack your readers for responding to you when you ban those who show this kind of treatment to you. We’re trying to have a discussion and you’re belittling those responding to you.
Peyton Manning = GFQTWHESINTHOEF
by coltsjunkie44 on Mar 30, 2011 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks, was really just trying to apply the same logic.
If you don’t mind me asking…what’s the major difference between a 1-tech & a 3-tech DT??
I like to pride myself on my football knowledge, but I’m more of an offensive guru, and don’t really know the D-Line too much in detail. Sorry if it’s a simple question…
No problem at all... I've been finding all of this out just in recent years as well
A 1 tech DT is going to be the guy who’s the “bulk” of the operation. He’s going to eat up the blocks of the O-linemen and his main responsibility is to free up space for the DT opposite, and the linebackers behind him.
A 3 tech is going to be the “penetrator” of the D’s inside and attempt to disrupt plays. Most of the time these will be the DT’s you see getting sacks as a result of blowing past a double team placed on the 1 tech… or a failed blocking assignment picking up a blitz by a LB. Moala is a growing 3-tech and has shown a lot of signs of potential in the spot. He gets in the backfield quickly and flushes the QB or RB out of their rhythm.
So that’s my somewhat limited knowledge on the subject… hope it helps!
Peyton Manning = GFQTWHESINTHOEF
by coltsjunkie44 on Mar 31, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
For further clarification,
the 1-tech, or NT, is lined up between the center and the guard, normally.
The 3-tech, or UT, is lined up between the guard and the tackle.
Drugs are bad.
by An Actual Fan of the Colts on Mar 31, 2011 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I doubt us picking Paea
Would love it, but doubtful. Would like to address the 1-tech and cut down on running yards.
The Colts play a gap shooting defense at the line, that requires faster players. It would be great to have a 1-tech that can man up and take on 2 blockers. The gap shooting defense allows seams for the running back and guards to get on our linebackers, which allows the longer running plays.

by 






























