Colts Sixth Round Pick Chris Rucker Projected As A Safety?
Let's put aside the obvious character red flags associated with Chris Rucker and focus, instead, on where he could potentially fit in with this team.
Last year this time, schmucks like me were worried that our depth at corner was lacking. Kelvin Hayden and Jerraud Powers can't stay healthy, and Jacob Lacey is limited as a cover corner. The trade for Justin Tryon helped significantly, but with the injury considered surrounding Kevin Thomas, the only two reliable corners (in terms of health) in 2010 were Tryon and Lacey.
While I think guys like Cornelius Brown are nice reserve players, the fact is that the Colts don't need more depth at this point. They need reliable starters. Is that why Rucker was picked? Can he provide something at corner? Or, were the Colts looking at Rucker as a possible successor to Bob Sanders?
At 6'1, 195 pounds, I initially thought that Rucker was another example of Colts head coach Jim Caldwell shifting away from smaller, zone coverage kids and going more with man-to-man cover corners with long arms and height. However, this nugget from NFLDraftScout.com's Rob Rang (writing for CBS Sports), caught my attention:
Chris Rucker's experience lies at cornerback, but many teams thought he projected better at safety. At either spot, in the sixth round he presented excellent value.
Rang graded the Colts with an 'A', saying:
It is tough to give a team an 'A' with only five picks, but no team did more with less this year than the Colts.
Rucker at safety? Clearly, strong safety is the team's biggest hole right now. The free agent status of Melvin Bullitt is very much up in the air. If we heed his own words, it's not a given he'll be back with the Colts in 2011. The Colts didn't take a safety in the 2011 NFL Draft, passing on players like Iowa's Tyler Sash to take Rucker. Can Rucker full the void left by Sanders?
Well, we know the kid can tackle (191 for his career at Michigan State), and he can make plays (six interceptions, 19 pass break-ups). However (from NFL.com):
Rucker has enough tools to be developed into a starting NFL corner but still has a ways to go. Teams will be enticed by his height, speed and ability to play press-man coverage. Really needs to improve his play in zone coverage. Doesn't recognize routes quick enough and is susceptible to pump fakes, double moves, etc. Does a good job tracking the football but doesn't possess the ball skills to routinely come down with interceptions. Has the mentality and size to be productive in run support but needs to do a better job getting off blocks. Could be a late Day 2 selection.
Again, he's big and strong. He can tackle. All these sound like a possible option at safety. I still think the Colts need to sign someone in free agency, such as Quintin Mikell of the Eagles or maybe Tanard Jackson of the Buccaneers. However, regardless of how they upgrade the position, it's very possible that Rucker was taken to provide more depth at both safety and corner.
Knowing that some teams projected him as a safety makes me feel better about the pick.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i noticed someone compared him to Marlin
but in the sense that Marlin had character issues in college but turned himself around.
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
Polian compared Marlin and Rucker’s skillsets….I don’t know who compared the characters of the two. I don’t think they are comparable.
Marlin did one thing wrong- and he wasn’t considered a character problem. Rucker has done at least 2 things wrong, so I think there is more to worry about with him.
i don't know who made that comparison, but i read it, that's all.
Rucker does make me uneasy.
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
Why FS?
If he is succeptable to to fakes and double moves, doesn’t he fit better in the box? I think you try him out and see what he can do. This selection was not about depth. It was a guy who had/has the skillset to develop into a second or third rounder. I wouldn’t be shocked or upset if he spent the year on the practice squad.
by strandedincarolina on May 1, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
CB skillset is closest to FS skillset
SS requires a different approach and body type. At least, if you want the SS to be a good run defender.
if he's easily faked out, wouldn't safety make more sense than CB?
one false move as a CB and your man is open.
as a safety you get another second to read and react to the play developing, and you don’t cover one-on-one as much.
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
Come on.
Title: Chris Rucker
First sentence: Eric Rucker

At least you didn't call him Darius Rucker.
I’d pay to see that, though.
I think the plan is to use Rucker as a safety that can drop down and cover the slot receiver.
Collie dog
by Garcon the check please! on May 1, 2011 4:45 PM EDT reply actions
Interesting picture of Rucker on this article
This particular play was a big pile of Rucker-fail. The WR is Marvin McNutt in the 2009 Iowa-Michigan State game. In fact it was the final play of the game. Just before the play McNutt went to the OC and told him he could beat his guy (Rucker). He did just that. On the snap McNutt cut inside of him into the endzone, burned Rucker and caught the TD pass winning the game.
Here is the play so you can see it for yourself: Video
I’m not impressed with Rucker as a player or as a person. This was a waste of a pick.
by the_iowa_hawkeye on May 1, 2011 5:04 PM EDT reply actions
So
Rucker should fit in well with this team then….see Shockey TD in the Super Bowl on a quick slant against Lacey.
I don't always drink beer....but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.
glad we took a bigger corner , need taller
corners or safeties to go up against the taller receivers that most teams are drafting now and it does suck that can’t sign any free agent rookies yet,, they need to join the lawsuit against the NFL,, does anyone know how many Colt players were able to get playboks during the one day window??? I am sure a few copies were made
Polian said he's a corner
I had the same thought that possibly he was going to be a converted safety, but Polian called him a ‘classic cover-2 corner’
So I guess there’s that. Little disappointing.
18to88.com
by deshawn zombie on May 1, 2011 6:48 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
The big problem is here is are we a cover 2 team anymore.
I don’t think we have an identity on D as Coyer has seemed to lack vision. We play way too much man in my opinion. I think you play to the strength of your players. With the injury history we have had at CB, there is worse things than taking a CB in the 6th.
by strandedincarolina on May 1, 2011 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions
We play way too much soft zone coverage.
What’s the easiest way to negate our DE’s pass-rush? Quick Passing (see Drew Brees, Superbowl).
What is a Tampa-2, zone coverage susceptible to? Quick Passing.
What can big, physical, man-to-man CB’s eliminate, or at least minimize? Quick Passing.
I heard that too.
Not sure what safeties we plan to rely on. Maybe we’re confident that Bullitt will return. Maybe we really like David Caldwell or Chip Vaughn. Maybe we’re gonna move Hayden to safety. Maybe we have some college FAs we love. I was pretty shocked we didn’t draft a safety, though.
not worried about his character concerns
nor do i believe he will be a safety
Character concerns...
…bogus. Got in a fight with 13 other players there and got caught drinking.
Big whoop. Pro’s for the kid in my book.
by I'm Not Alone, I'm Just Blue on May 1, 2011 9:42 PM EDT reply actions

by 





























