Bill Polian And Competition Committee Plan To Ban 'Launching,' Improve Player Safety
FOX Sports' Alex Marvez is reporting that the NFL's Competition Committe, of which Colts chairman Bill Polian is a powerful member, is planning proposed rules intended ban or curtail curtail 'launching' by defenders. The intent is to improve player safety by, essentially, making it extremely illegal for any defender to leave his feet to strike an opponent with his helmet and upper torso.
A source told FOXSports.com that the league’s competition committee will make its revised pitch to teams at next week’s spring owners meeting in Indianapolis. Tabled at another NFL owners meeting in March, a lengthy proposal that some teams thought was too vague and expansive will now be presented as three separate rules.
The measures are designed to provide further protection for "defenseless" wide receivers, i.e. those attempting to catch a pass or who have completed a catch and not had time to protect themselves or clearly become a runner.
In general, this 're-launch' of 'anti-launching' rules sound good. People like me love football because we like seeing touchdowns, tackling, interceptions... not players concussed and motionless on the field. If this were done during John Lynch's playing days, he never would have been a Pro Bowler. The man made a living launching, helmet first, into players.
I personally don't think these rules are meant to curtail the kinds of hits Austin Collie took last year, which resulted in three concussions. All of those hits did not involve launching. I think the new rules are meant to lay the kybosh on fools like Brandon Meriweather of the Patriots.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Use the Patriots safety, of course.
Must be Polian trying to change the rules to stop the Patriots, again!
Seriously though, I hate these types of tackles. How much longer before we see two guys lying motionless after one of these styles of hits? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVz0a8uHBOY
This is how you hit someone: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwiMtGsFHwA
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on May 19, 2011 11:37 AM EDT reply actions
Patriots
Not all Pats players are bums. But, Meriweather’s hit was possibly the dirtiest all last year.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.
I'd agree with that.
I don’t know about “dirty” to describe it, as dirty implies some kind of intent to injure (Meriweather’s just a bad player, not a thug coughHarrisoncough), but most dangerous, definitely.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on May 19, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Meriweather
Watch the video. It’s pretty deliberate.
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue and editor of SB Nation Indiana.
I doubt his intention was to hit Heap in the head, as he was turning around.
That’s just how he tackles – with his helmet. As long as he does that, I don’t want him.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on May 19, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
*as Heap turned around
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on May 19, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions
great, more rules for the refs to f--k up!
they should use instant replay in determining whether a “launch” happened or not. There were countless plays last season that were penalized when they were actually clean, legal, hard hits. This will be a flag football league before we know it…its pretty sad
by bigpony on May 19, 2011 12:34 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
good call on John Lynch...
dont forget Steve Atwater too!
Always a fan of player safety improvements.
We see far too many retired players with physical and mental health complications. Nice to see Polian taking a lead on the committee, as always.
Antoine Bethea - the most underrated safety in the NFL.
by Ben Savage on May 19, 2011 12:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Mind you
The Merriweather hit was already illegal under the old rules. But I suppose broadening the definition has its uses.
The :defenseless receiver" part is the kicker.
A shot to the head should be a shot to the head, regardless of the player on the receiving end. The rule should attempt to stop helmet-to-helmet contact resulting from a player spearing into the victim, failing to address that is missing the point entirely.
"Perhaps it was the Noid who should have avoided me." Mayor Adam West
by insertscreenname on May 23, 2011 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm all for banning hits to the head on all defenseless players
The problem with removing them from the game entirely is that in cases where the player was not defenseless, it’s often very difficult to partition blame. Do you blame the guy who didn’t get hurt, even if both players lowered their heads? Ball carriers frequently use their heads to beat back would-be tacklers, and it’s unfair to blame the defender in such a collision if he happens to have a thicker skull.
When it’s clear that one player did nothing to initiate a blow to his own head, however, I’m down with penalizing the striker.

by 




























