Colts Roster Projection: How The Colts Will Comply With New Salary Cap Numbers
It was reported Thursday that both the Players Association and the Owners have agreed on a new salary structure for Rookies, as well as what the Salary Cap number will be for 2011, $120 Million. Also included in this will be a new, higher salary floor, and, from my understanding, that the salary cap will be in actual dollars spent, instead of all the games teams would play under the previous CBA.
Let me expound a little on that last point. Under the old CBA, teams could throw in incentives which would be virtually impossible to get, but that dollar amount would still count as "salary" under the cap. On the flip side, teams could spread out bonuses, so teams like the Redskins could go nuts signing Free Agents, but only part of that bonus would count against the cap, so the real money spent blew away the cap number, but due to the rules, it was all good.
With the new cap seemingly simplifying how the cap works, we can take a look at just how the Colts will comply with these new rules. What I've done after the jump is created my version of the 53 man roster for Week 1, including Colt Free Agents they should re-sign, other Free Agents they should sign (including some rookies), and attempted my best guess at what those deals would look like. I'll explain a little more my methodology after the jump. All salary data came from Spotrac, which is an excellent site for salary data.
Let's jump in...
I'm going to start with current Colts, already under contract, who I believe will make the 53 man roster. I've split them up into Offense / Defense, only to minimize the white space on the page.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you total that all up, it's 35 guys at $54,505,000, way below the salary floor, and not even halfway to the salary cap. What exactly does that mean? It means the Colts will have to spend some money, as Peyton Manning won't take all $65 Million (although, as you'll see, he could easily take more than half of that). You'll notice that I've kept Kelvin Hayden on the roster, but there is no Ryan Diem.
We can go back and forth on those two guys, but that's how I see it playing out. The Front Office used the first two picks in the 2011 draft on the Offensive Line, making Diem expendable. I think the staff likes Hayden and will give him another year. With both Reggie Wayne and Robert Mathis becoming Free Agents at the end of the season, I think this will be Hayden's last year in Indy unless he turns in a Pro Bowl season, which I'll gladly take.
First, let's look at the rookies, as I can see all 5 draft picks making the roster. In looking at quite a few rookie deals, the actual salaries are quite low, almost at the minimum, even for first round picks. Here's a ballpark for the five rookie draft picks:
| Rookies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Last | Pos | 2011 Salary | 2011 Bonus |
| Chris | Rucker | DB | 320,000 | 150,000 |
| Drake | Nevis | DT | 335,000 | 600,000 |
| Benjamin | Ijalana | OL | 335,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Anthony | Costanzo | OL | 425,000 | 1,500,000 |
| Delone | Carter | RB | 335,000 | 400,000 |
| Total | 1,750,000 | 3,650,000 | ||
Costanzo's numbers are similar to Bryan Bulaga's contract, as he was picked just one spot lower in the 2010 draft, and plays Tackle. The others are based on previous draft picks picked around the same area. These clearly aren't scientific, and may be off by quite a bit, but I think they're reasonable. We're now at 40 players and $59,905,000, so there's still $60 million to play with, and 13 Free Agent players to go.
That's start with Manning. I feel pretty confident that he's going to get a 5 year deal, as we've heard several members of the Colts Front Office mention that is how many years they think he has left. He'll be 40 when his contract ends, and I have little doubt he'll still be worth it. I'm really just guessing, but I think he's going to average over $20 Million per year, which means over $100 Million. I went with $110 Million, but again it's a guess on the high end. He'd easily be the highest paid player in the league, and let's face it: he deserves that kind of money.
Because the Colts have so much space, I think the signing bonus is going to be quite large, which is why I put it at $25 Million, leaving $85 Million left. It seemed a typical scale is an increase in salary of 25% each year, so that's what the salary number is based on. I used that figure for all the multi-year deals. That leaves the Colts with roughly $25 Million in cap space left, where they must spend at least $13 Million to hit the floor.
How will the Colts spend that money? Here's what I think they should do:
| Free Agents | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Last | Pos | 2011 Salary | 2011 Bonus | Years | $ (Mill) |
| Joseph | Addai | RB | 2,750,000 | 4,000,000 | 4 | 20 |
| Eric | Foster | DT | 700,000 | 300,000 | 3 | 3 |
| Antonio | Johnson | DT | 1,300,000 | 450,000 | 3 | 5.5 |
| Charlie | Johnson | OL | 1,250,000 | 750,000 | 3 | 5.5 |
| Peyton | Manning | QB | 10,350,000 | 25,000,000 | 5 | 110 |
| Jamie | Silva | DB | 500,000 | 1 | 0.45 | |
| Adam | Vinatieri | K | 1,200,000 | 1 | 1.2 | |
| Free | Agent | DB | 2,400,000 | 1,000,000 | 4 | 15 |
| Free | Agent | DE | 320,000 | Rookie | ||
| Free | Agent | LB | 450,000 | 2nd Year | ||
| Free | Agent | OL | 335,000 | Rookie | ||
| Free | Agent | QB | 335,000 | Rookie | ||
| Free | Agent | WR | 1,750,000 | 600,000 | 2 | 4.5 |
| Total | 23,640,000 | 32,100,000 | ||||
I have the Colts resigning six other former players besides Manning, including Joseph Addai, both of the Johnsons, Eric Foster (stay thirsty), Jamie Silva (I like his special teams play despite coming off the injury), and Adam Vinatieri on a one year deal. Again, the Colts need to spend a minimum of $13 Million, and they've always been more willing to give their own the big money rather than a Free Agent. These 6 guys cover the minimum $13 Million, so we've now hit the salary floor, but let's spend some more money on those last 6 guys.
As you see, I don't have names next to the positions, but I think those are the positions the Colts will go after. The Defensive Back is a Safety, and that should be enough to get a good player to play with Antoine Bethea. The Wide Receiver's salary was made with one player in mind: Plaxico Burress. I have to think that would be a deal Burress would take in a heartbeat, and it wouldn't kill the Colts. I don't have much heartburn if that money goes to the DL, LB, or the OL, but I think it is best used on a toy for Manning. I could see a couple of those other Free Agent spots given to Colts Free Agents, or obviously undrafted rookies.
So where does this leave the salary at for the Colts? $115,645,000, giving the Colts a little over $4 Million to work with, if they so choose. I actually think they won't go all the way to the cap, due to expiring contracts after this season. As a finale, here's my full 53 man roster, with 2011 cap hit included.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who should fill those Free Agent spots, or where could the Colts better use the Free Agent money, even that extra $4 Million? Fire away in the comments.
32 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Defensive Tackle
I would love to see a bit of that extra $4 million put towards a free agent DT. If the Colts do that (get a quality safety and more talent in the DT rotation) the defense should be top 15 at the least. I’m thinking a Brandon Mebane type would work well.
by ColtsPensacola on Jul 15, 2011 11:23 PM EDT reply actions
Two thoughts about the new cap calculations
Are they really going to count the entire bonus for the year the player signs? That seems like it would unfairly benefit teams that recently signed major players to long term deals under the old rules. So the Patriots wouldn’t have to count Brady’s bonus at all because he signed during the year, but Peyton’s counts completely this year? That seems unfair enough that they’d have done something to balance it.
But going forward, if bonuses count in current years, I expect we’ll see a dramatic decrease in signing bonuses. They were a major component of most contracts under the old rules because those rules encouraged them as a way to increase the total value of talent you could sign. Even if a particular team was well under the cap, the market was heavily influenced by teams that needed to use cap-friendly bonuses. They won’t go away entirely since the players will still want them, but teams are going to be less willing to give them.
So I really doubt that Manning is going to get a $25 million bonus that counts against this year’s cap.
New rules will cause winners and losers
There’s no doubt that some teams will benefit if the salary cap now becomes straight dollars spent, but I don’t think you’ll see that big of a drop off in signing bonus, especially with a salary floor upwards of 90%. In this projection here, the minimum that Manning could receive, and the Colts meet the salary floor, is $18 Million. Still a nice sized bonus. That, I believe, is the trade-off for going to a straight cash salary system, which the players wanted.
The best thing about that $25 million bonus is it’s off the books for next year, meaning that money is freed up basically every year for the team to use on bonuses. I think that’ll be the case going forward, that teams will set aside money in the cap for bonuses, and just use it over and over again. Some years it’ll go mostly to one person (like this one), others it may be spread over 4 or 5 players.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
I thought...
Bonus $$ was spread out over the life of the contract. So a $25 million signing bonus on a 5-year contract counted as $5 million per season against the cap…
Your projections are a little odd ball. First, Colts never carry 3 QBs on their roster. Other than that Blair White and John Chick deserve roster spots this year and will count less toward the cap. Plaxico will not be in a Colts uniform next year, defense will be a higher priority, plus more teams will pay for his services. Also, if Addai wants to command a large contract, than he will have to find work elsewhere too. More teams are running back by committee now-a-days, you don’t need a do-it-all back. Having running backs for 3rd downs, short yardage, and elusiveness can be 3 different roster spots. In essence Colts nearly have all that currently on the roster, even if they decide to part ways with Addai.
NeXt Man Up
by Dann Giszewski on Jul 16, 2011 12:47 AM EDT reply actions
+10
and no, the zero is not a drunken typo.
by nickfromnaptown on Jul 16, 2011 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Well thank you good sir.
I also believe the new CBA will force a lot of teams to have to reconstruct players contracts to abide to the new salary cap structuring. So, players like Tom Brady whose contract was finished before the lockout will need to be adjusted accordingly. Certain teams will have there hands forced and may release all their money pit type players. All-in-all, It should make for an interesting few weeks leading up to opening day,
NeXt Man Up
by Dann Giszewski on Jul 16, 2011 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
good post
i disagree that blair white adn john chick deserve roster sposts. i really dont know how chick deserves anything. what has he done?
but for sure plaxico wont be a colt. that ruined the whole article for me. which it was an interesting article.
See above post about Addai
He will command the kind of contract projected, so it is a perfectly reasonable position to say the Colts won’t sign him to it. I believe the Colts tend to take care of their own over shelling out for someone else, so if they are going to spend that kind of money on a RB, it’ll be Addai over anyone else.
The 3rd QB comes from the lack of an off-season for Manning to rehab, and my general feeling about Painter. Add in Manning is 35 now, and I don’t see it as a stretch to add the 3rd QB. Could they go without one and add another special teams player? Of course.
Those Free Agent slots I had in there weren’t exclusively for other teams. White and Chick could easily take those spots. I just don’t think they are set like some of those other guys.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
First of all, the Colts have a lot more (60+), than 35 players under contract
And then, the numbers are wrong. For example, Mathis has a roster bonus too, Saturday’s salary is bigger…
he's just focusing on the projected opening-day roster, hence he stopped at 53
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
Salary has to account for people beyond the 53 man roster
I agree with Ty.
Take a look at this, from one year before, the 2009-10 season
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/football/nfl/Colts/salaries/2009-10
Separate signing bonuses and performance bonuses, and at least maintain the same number of players as this list, which I think is 58, if I counted right.
Then, all of a sudden, the room to sign everyone that we want to sign is not that much.
I went off the numbers on Spotrac
which may have a few inconsistencies with other sites. Rotoworld had Saturday’s salary as $500K more, and they didn’t report Mathis’ roster bonus. That’s why I didn’t go all the way to the cap number, and these are obviously just guesses at this point.
I’m assuming that they do have to leave some room for replacement players as well, as I believe they count towards the cap. However, anyone they bring in mid-season, and even preseason, will be an entry level guy, making whatever the minimum salary would be for his years of service. I hope the catastrophic list of injuries we saw in 2010 doesn’t occur again this year, and I don’t expect it to. It was just a random dumb-luck type of year.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
in regard to the change mgrex expounded upon in the second paragraph...
it sounds like a more sensible form of accounting.
Does anyone know if that affects how injured/IR’d players are accounted for?
I mean, under the old system, did an IR’d player’s salary come off the cap for the rest of the year, allowing a bit of space to sign a replacement? Is that what will be done going forward?
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
Let's hold off on cutting Diem until the final cutdown....just in case
it’s a an eternity until the first game that counts.
who knows who’ll be in shape, live up to their draft hype, and stay injury-free in preseason.
true, we’ve got new 2 infusions of new blood that will help resuscitate the unit,
but i’m loathe to hollow out the depth as soon as we’ve finally accumulated some.
at tackle, mgrex only has CJ, Link, Costanzo, and an unnamed FA o-lineman
(remember last year’s FAs Adam Terry and Andy Alleman… less than inspiring).
better to have Diem as insurance,
especially since most stampeders want all Link, & Costanzo starting with CJ inside.
in addition to the 4M in cap space mgrex projects, there’s also the $5M vet exception to use
Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important. -- Eugene J. McCarthy
He's right...
There is supposed to be a “mid-level” exemption to encourage teams to keep decently paid veterans. Not sure where it actually will land though I’ve read from 3-5million.
Every Breath That Is In Your Lungs
Is A Tiny Little Gift To Me
Is A Tiny Little Gift To Me
by DClark#44 on Jul 16, 2011 9:50 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It'd be nice to keep Diem as insurance...
But not for the $5-6 million that we’d hafta pay him.
I would rather have DeAngelo Williams for the money they are going to spead on Addai.
I think the Colts should go after Eric Weddle, Jonathon Joseph, Quintin Mikell or Brandon Mebane. Any one of them would make me happy. Make the right cuts and we could easily get two/three of them under the cap.
As far as Burress goes… I understand he will come cheap. But with Sidney Rice and Steve Smith (NYG) available, I say spend the extra cash and get someone a lot more talented and less of a idiot.
If money is equal
the Colts will sign Addai over Williams, no doubt in my mind. They trust their own guys, and I believe Manning wants Addai to stay. I think that’ll go far in the Colts decision making.
I think one of those four defensive players will be a Colt next year, but I doubt they can get two of them. I also think Joseph is a clear 4th priority on that list.
Based on these numbers, I think the Colts have the money for 3 decent sized contracts other than Manning. My guess is they’ll go for two bigger ones and on smaller one. I chose Addai, a FA safety, and a smaller $$ WR. I think WR is a position of need, but not necessary with big money. Manning seems to do ok with whomever is running routes, within reason.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
Manning wants Addai to stay?
Is that guess work, or have you heard it said? I’m sure he does….
by braveheartcolt on Jul 17, 2011 8:39 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
interesting article...
but imho 100-25 equals 75 rather than 85 as you calculated in regards of manning’s contract. sure that doesn’t change anything regarding your figures.
by Martin Steinkogler on Jul 17, 2011 7:37 AM EDT reply actions
I had Manning at $110 Million
which is why it’s $85 Mill after the bonus.
Creator and developer of the Winning Stats.
Manning's comfort level
We are SOOO spoiled. Have we forgotten how important RB blocking is to the Colts scheme and Manning’s comfort level? Isn’t paying him a bit more, in a front loaded contract that doesn’t hurt when he is cut in 2 years, a good idea? This was the major concern when Edge left the Colts. Also, neither Brown or Carter are known for blocking skills. Not that they can’t learn, but that education is MUCH easier with Addai there. I think he’s in a Colts uni.
I also think that the number up there is reasonable. They might be able to get him for less, any more is probably over spending. As several people have stated Addai may not be in high demand by other teams, and he is more valuable here. It just makes sense to keep him.
As far as FA’s go, I don’t think the Colts will carry 3 QB’s and I PRAY that they use all of that money and some of the 4 mil to sign a young, good DT. Just like Manning, pay him bonus money upfront and pay Mathis and Wayne next year.
Yeah, I'm Shure.
Re-signing Bullitt should be a priority.
I did not see anywhere on this post anything about re-signing Melvin Bullitt. Although he was not as explosive or impactful player as Bob Sanders ever was, he did a fantastic job filling in for him when he was injured. Although he was on IR last year, he should have a shot to compete for the starting position along with a free agent.
Bullitt is less proven than Addai
To me, Bullitt is less proven than Addai and was missing tackles left and right last year before his season ending injury. He is playing the same game that Brackett played. I remember Brackett even stating that if the Patriots were to approach him, he would entertain it, or something of that sort stating that they were a great organization, blah, blah, blah…though he was answering a loaded question “if he would be interested in signing with a rival like the Pats”.
Bullitt is worth what he was playing at, a second round tender at $1.7 mil. for a year. Due to the dearth of quality safeties, he might be able to hardball the Colts for $3 mil. per year, that is my worst fear, and in all likelihood, something that will happen. A 3 year contract for $9-10 mil. should seal the deal though it will still be overpaying him.
It is a player’s market out there due to the short time frame for signing, IMO.
DID ANYONE SEE ESPN YESTERDAY???? THEY SAID WE ARE ONLY 2 MILLION UNDER THE CAP
who’s right? John Clayton or above????
I think...
That was already with Manning’s franchise-tagged salary, and assuming we don’t cut Diem or Hayden.
Hopefully we can structure Manning’s contract to free up a little space this season, and cutting Diem will save $5 million or so. Even if we don’t cut Hayden (which would save $9 million!!!), I’m holding out hope that we can re-structure his deal to save a few million.
Regardless, I’m hoping/thinking we should have close to $10 million to spend on some FA’s.
Also...
I wonder if that was including all of the tenders the team made before the lockout??
Addai?
I can’t believe they would pay Addai that kind of money. He is least productive starting back in the NFL. They need to amke a run at Deangelo Williams or Micheal Bush.
by Devilsaccomplice on Jul 24, 2011 4:21 PM EDT reply actions



































