Despite Lower Salary Cap, Jim Irsay Still Plans On Making Peyton Manning Highest Paid Player In NFL (Or So We Assume)
Last night, the Colts held a conference call with owners Jim Irsay and some local media. Excuse me while I vent for a second, but bloggers were not invited. It's a shame, and it's yet another example of the Colts P.R. decisions-makers having their heads up the butts. As I've often said, media access is rarely granted solely by the P.R. or Communications Department at West 56th Street. Craig Kelley didn't call the shots when it came to media access, and I strongly sense the new guy (Avis Roper) is in the same boat. P.R. policy is handed down by the Polians, and so far with Chris Polian, the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree.
For those of you who unnecessarily complain that we harp on this, you're just going to have to deal. This has been, and will be, an ongoing subject here at Stampede Blue because media access and the changing culture within sports media is just as vital to the continued growth of this site as the game on the field is. Part of what we are about is breaking down the establishment for the simple reason that we don't like it. It was that establishment that led to such poor coverage of the team in the first place, and the birth of this site in 2006. Coverage for this local NFL team is one of the worst in the country. Our goal has been, and continues to be, to change that. In several ways, we have. So, if you don't like us talking about it, that's kind of tough. We're going to continue to do it. You can either choose to read it, or not. We make no apologies for the subjects we choose to cover and discuss here.
Back to Irsay's chat, on the call he had some very interesting words to say about Peyton Manning and his new contract. As you all know, Manning has the franchise tag on him. It would be roster suicide for the Colts to have Manning play the 2011 season with that tag. It's simply too much money against the cap (which is roughly $120 million this year) for the Colts to field a competitive team.
Irsay, via PFT:
I’ve offered to make him the highest paid player. We know when we look at our team, we need people to surround him to have a chance to win a Super Bowl. With the cap actually going down this year, [Tom] Brady’s contract is something that would be reduced so-to-speak. There’s only so much you can pay one player. Whatever the number is, $20 million, you’re topping off there. Then it becomes very difficult to be competitive and to field a team.
As PFT notes in its article, these statements are different than what Jim Irsay was signing prior to the lockout.
He is going to be the highest paid player and he is going to make more than Brady. At the same time, under the system, you cannot pay a player $25 million dollars. It’s just not going to work and you’re not going to be able to compete. We have to get something done and I look forward to doing that. I’ve had a conversation with Tom Condon and we’ve talked in the last couple of days. Bill Polian and him will process in the next days to come. It’s something that we need to get done.
Again, these statements by Irsay suggest concern on his part for how the new Manning deal will affect the team's ability to sign additional talent. Manning having a $25 million dollar cap hit against the 2011 bottom line is simply not a workable solution. That cap number must go down.
However, from Manning's point of view, and from the P.O.V. of the soon-to-be-re-certified-NFLPA, it is not the player's job to make sure his yearly cap hit fits within the team budget. That's the general manager's job, and it's a job Chris Polian is paid very handsomely to do. We all know Manning is worth the money he is going to get, and if that money doesn't work itself into this flawed roster, one could argue that the fault is not Manning's. It's Bill and Chris Polian's fault.
Maybe if Bob Sanders wasn't signed to a bloated and over-valued contract in 2008, we wouldn't have this issue.
Maybe if Kelvin Hayden wasn't signed to a bloated and over-valued contract in 2009, we wouldn't have this issue.
Maybe if Gary Brackett wasn't signed to a bloated and over-valued contract in 2010, we wouldn't have this issue.
Maybe is money and draft picks weren't wasted on Tony Ugoh, Mike Pollak, and Donald Brown, we wouldn't have this issue.
Now, from a P.R. standpoint (see how we brought this back full circle), what is likely to happen should Peyton demand his full value and tell Irsay and the Polians that the cap 'problems' they are whining about don't concern him, the spin that will likely echo both from West 56th and the the willing media is that Peyton is being 'greedy.'
Listen, you and I both know that without Peyton Manning, the Indianapolis Colts simply do not exist.
Diehard Colts fans hate hearing that, but it's the truth. Peyton himself knows it. The only reason the Colts fill that downtown stadium (paid for with public money) is Peyton. The only reason the Colts get all those primetime games on NBC and ESPN is Peyton. The only reason this team won ten games last year and not five was Peyton.
People don't pay top dollar to see Dwight Freeney sack someone or Anthony Gonzalez to trip over his own feet and injury his knee. They pay to see Peyton. Peyton is the Colts, and Jim Irsay needs Peyton a helluva lot more than Peyton needs Irsay. That's the plain, simple, honest, cold-hard, big-foreheaded truth.
This exact same situation will play in in New Orleans with Drew Brees next year and with Matt Ryan in Atlanta when their contracts are up. Prior to Brees, Saints fans wore bags on their heads. Before Ryan, Atlanta fans were embarrassed to admit they had season tickets. Brees and Ryan will most certainly demand their full value, and that value will be measured by what Peyton gets this year. Thus, all members of the NFLPA are VERY interested in seeing Peyton push for his full value.
For all professional players, getting paid is more important than 'winning.' This is, after all, a business, folks.
All that said, even though Peyton and Tom Condon have Irsay's gonads locked in a vice, I think they all will agree on something that will help Indy's cap and allow the Colts to sign some people that can get this team back to a Super Bowl. Peyton is very conscious of his legacy, and he is a fierce competitor. If any professional athlete has the drive to win in an environment when paychecks are more valued prize than rings, it's Peyton.
Whatever is agreed to, it will be in the best interests of Manning and the Colts. The pressure will then be on the Polians not to screw up the roster going forward as they have done for the last four years, or so.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Maybe they don't include bloggers...
Because you constantly bash Bill Polian & the front office! Just a thought…
But a serious question – is it common around the league for teams to include local bloggers in press conferences & conference calls? Is it just the Colts’ organization that doesn’t do it?
you just asked
the same question i was going to ask……how many other teams, or what % of NFL teams grant bloggers equal access as established media for “routine” things?
by Rocky Top Manning on Jul 26, 2011 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Manning
I agree with most of what you said. The caviat is , if Manning is healthy and that remains to be seen. A large contract and an unhealthy Manning will KILL this franchise no ifs ands about it.
An "unhealthy" Manning
is still probably worth at least 10 wins a year, i.e. good enough to win the afc south.
PASS10N
Is that really the case?
“ALL (emphasis mine) members of the NFLPA are interested are VERY interested in seeing Peyton push for his full value.”
I’m not really sure this is a true statement. Maybe guys like Brees, Matt Ryan, Aaron Rodgers, etc. are interested in seeing Peyton get his full value. They know their future contracts will be based (at least to some degree) by what he gets. But the thing is- it’s not like one guy getting an enormous contract is going to do a single thing to help everyone else in the NFLPA make more money. Quite the opposite- the more money the top guys make, the less there is for the mid- and low-level guys. And for every Peyton, Brees, and Rodgers, there are 100 JAG’s who might not care to see the top guys make quite so much.
The salary cap limits how much each team can spend. Why would the average NFL player want the top 20% of the guys on the team make 80% of that total?
Am I missing something here?
by ColtsFanInTexas on Jul 26, 2011 11:41 AM EDT reply actions
Becuase if it happens....
The owners are pressured to raise the salary cap each year in order to keep and maintain a pool of talent, while the union reaps the benefit over overall growth in each skill position.
Winning = Manning endorsement money
Winning games & championships should have a pretty sizable impact on Manning’s endorsement income. If he wins another Super Bowl or two, his popularity will skyrocket to levels not seen since Michael Jordan. Conversely, if the Colts stop making the playoffs, then I would think his value would drop significantly.
It's not only making the playoffs
They have to win in the playoffs…Manning is expected to get the Colts to the playoffs, but he needs W’s in the postseason, and a couple of more Superbowl rings. I understand that Manning should be heavily compensated for being the best, but I strongly feel that he needs to leave the Colts Franchise with some room to make some key signing; our defense appears to disappear in the playoffs and on the road and our run stopping still stinks.
I think we need to sign one more key O-linemen, a CB and a Safety. Our LBs and DTs are undersized and the recipe to beat the Colts has been out there for years now; keep Manning off the field.
I think for as much as he is worth, it might be the time for PM to step-back and realize that another monster contract will not necessarily translate to SB Wins (which is ultimately the grand prize)…take less of the pot, ask for key signings as support and go win a GD Superbowl! AND IN INDY!
"No one's gonna take me alive
The time has come to make things right
You and I must fight for our rights
You and I must fight to survive"
Very good point.
If Manning allows himself to be surrounded with players than enable him to win championships, then endorsement money will dwarf his salary from the team. Ultimately, he would end up making even more money and doing more for his legacy.
Yes but you are neglecting one thing: Even if Manning takes less what makes you think we’ll get better players?
I mean Polian after all got us Hank Baskett for Special teams and we all know how that turned out.
Instead of Rodger Saffold protecting Manning’s blind side we got Jerry Hughes who’s rather unnecessary in comparison.
List goes on with the picks he’s whiffed in recent years.
That’s what I don’t get sure Manning could take less but does that mean we’ll get a better team in return? Not necessarily.
Hypothetically...
We could sign Manning to a full contract…
Or Manning at a slight discount AND Joseph Addai.
See the difference?? Need more examples??
Like I said it doesn’t mean the team will get better because of it. If they can’t sign Addai(after signing Bullitt and Vinateri) regardless of Manning’s contract then its obvious they don’t want him. If they want you bad enough they’ll get it done.
I just don’t think Manning’s contract will break the team like Irsay is trying to sell the media which BTW is a bitch move on his part.
Ughhhhh
Why does Peyton have to have the biggest contract?? Why not sign for less and give the Colts the opportunity to sign some more impact players like Rice, Weddle, Harris, etc, as it will help the Colts win championships which should be Peyton’s goal!!
"The goal remains the same"
by TimeToPlayHard on Jul 26, 2011 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
18.1 million a year, that would be best
Manning, Condon, don’t be greedy!
by Ty46 on Jul 26, 2011 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Irsay is backtracking I see.. he shouldn’t have said that he wanted to make Manning the highest paid if he doesn’t want to. And we all know he will but if he thinks this is going to make Manning blink it won’t.
Personally I don’t get the logic that somehow if Manning takes less that it makes the team better. The extra money could easily go to an even lesser player and make him overpaid. At least if Manning got most of the pie at least it goes to someone who actually earned it.
I’d like for Manning to take less but I also am not dumb enough to expect it either. Or at least think that it would cripple the franchise for years to come.
Maybe Polian and Co need to pick better players.
Nice!
“People don’t pay top dollar to see Dwight Freeney sack someone or Anthony Gonzalez to trip over his own feet and injury his knee. They pay to see Peyton. Peyton is the Colts, and Jim Irsay needs Peyton a helluva lot more than Peyton needs Irsay. That’s the plain, simple, honest, cold-hard, big-foreheaded truth.”
This whole paragraph is classic. Especially the Gonzo line. LMFAO! It’s so true and everyone knows it. As for PM’s contract situation, I’m definitely not worried. Like you mentioned in the article, if anyone is willing to take a “pay cut” to field a more competitive team and win some Super Bowls, it’s Manning.
I am more intrigued by who we sign in this huge FA market. Weddle would be amazing and there was mention on ESPN of some possible interest in Randy Moss, which is probably pure bullshit/speculation. Either way, Free Agency is our road to success. That, and of course the draft. Hopefully Castonzo pans out.
My blood-type is Colts and FORD blue.

by 
































