2011 NFL Free Agents: Colts Should Target Plaxico Burress, WR, NY State Prison
Between now and the start of free agency, Stampede Blue will profile free agents the Indianapolis Colts could and should target when the new collective bargaining agreement is signed and the lockout lifted.
Free Agent Target: Plaxico Burress, WR, Oneida Correctional Facility
Matt Grecco wrote an article a month ago discussing why the Colts should take a look at former-NY Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress. With a new NFL collective bargaining agreement that is, apparently, closer to getting completed than many people realize, it's a good time to re-visit that article and, possibly, add a few more details to it.
As you all know, Plaxico Burress has spent the last two years in jail after he please guilty to a charge of criminal possession of a weapon. Burress discharged a loaded firearm in a Manhattan nightclub in 2008. He was charged with the crime, plead guilty, and has served his time. Prior to serving his sentence, the New York Giants released the troubled wide receiver. He now enters the 2011 season as a 33-year-old free agent who has not played in a football game since Week 11 of 2008.
Burress has several knocks against him, and is a longshot to get himself back to the kind of dominant player he was prior to, nearly literally, shooting himself in the foot. However, the potential outweighs the negatives in this case, and the Colts could definitely use some depth at wide receiver in 2011, in particular someone who can take the top off the defense.
When Dallas Clark went down with a wrist injury after the Colts Week Six victory over the Redskins, the Colts lost their most consistent deep threat. Dan Dakich at 1070 The Fan in Indianapolis often spoke about Clark's deep threat ability last season, and without Clark the Colts lost the ability to push the ball down the field. Yes, Pierre Garcon can jet down the sidelines (just ask Antonio Cromartie), but he is not a consistent deep threat. He just drops too many passes.
Clark is consistent, especially off play action, running routes down the seam.
Now, players like Austin Collie offer some big play ability as well, but the concerns about Collie involve his health going forward after sustaining two official concussions (three unofficial) last year. Reggie Wayne's knee problems have limited his big play ability in recent years. Though he caught 111 passes last season (a career high) he averaged on 12.2 yards per catch, which was a career low. Remember, from 2004-2009, he averaged 14.1 yards per catch! To provide some fans a little perspective on just how impressive that is, Texans wideout Andre Johnson (who many consider the best in football) has averaged roughly 14 yards per catch since 2006.
Overall, the Colts wideouts are older, slower, and lacking in big play ability this season than in years past. Gone are the days when people trembled at the thought of covering Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, and Brandon Stokley all in their primes.
It's in this department, the 'down-the-field-big-play' area, that Plaxico could help the Colts.
In his article last month, Matt focused on Burress's ability to catch passes at 'middle distance':
Burress, however, is most like Garcon, in that he is/would be used deeper down the field than the other guys (including Wayne). In Burress's last season in NY, he caught almost half of his passes at "Middle" distances, according to Football Outsiders. In contrast, last season Wayne was only at 30% (and 43% on "Short" passes), Collie was 20% (and 59% "Short"), and White had 29% "Middle" distance passes (45% "Short"). In contrast, Garcon was at 37% for both "Short" and "Middle" distances, which is the closest match to Burress that the Colts have.
Burress also ranked at 19% on deep passes in 2008, and his catch rate overall was 53%. Compared to Pierre Garcon in 2010, who had a catch rate of 56%, that's not great. In fact, Burress has never had a catch rate above 53% since Football Outsiders started tracking him. For comparisons sake, Austin Collie had an absolute INSANE catch rate of 82% in 2010 before he got his bell rung three times.
But, with Collie, his deep percentage rate was just 10%. Garcon's was (once again) 13%. Reggie Wayne's was 14%. Pittsburgh Steelers deep threat Mike Wallace had a 16% deep percentage in 2010. Jets wideout Santonio Holmes was 20%.
Again, Burress in 2008 was 19%. By comparison, that's pretty good.
Also, factor in that, from 2005-2008, Burress averaged 14.8 yards per catch. Had he finished out the 2008 season, that number would probably be up to 15 yards per catch. On the Colts roster right now, there is no one who can consistently average that number. Garcon has the ability to do it (he averaged 16.3 in 2009), but he has not demonstrated that he can do it consistently.
In many ways, Burress (when he was with the Giants) was a taller, more consistent version of Pierre Garcon. He dropped about as many passes as Garcon does, but unlike Garcon he was able to consistently stretch the field. Should the Colts try and sign Burress, and I think they will, it will be because they want someone else to help push the top off the defense, opening up the underneath and seam routes to guys like Collie and Clark.
The key question is does Burress still have that speed?
In terms of 'culture fit,' I personally think the Colts are perfect for Burress. He craves structure at this point in his life, and is looking for a talented team in a low key market. It also doesn't hurt that Peyton friggin Manning is the quarterback. One-time Colts coach Tony Dungy is personally mentoring Burress. So, there's a Colts connection right there. Burress will have veterans like Reggie, Peyton, Dallas, and Jeff Saturday to lean on.
Overall, Burress signing with Indy just makes sense. The one drawback is that, in August, Burress will be 34 and an unlikely candidate to help on special teams. When you consider that Wayne, Garcon and especially Collie are unlikely to play on special teams, the addition of Burress (who won't start) would add another receiver to the active roster who is unable to play for Ray Rychleski's crew.
Signing someone like Burress likely means Anthony Gonzalez is a goner, because, like Burress, Gonzo has no value as a special teams player while Blair White does. So, in essence, the team would be switching Burress for Gonzo. Personally, I'm OK with that. The irony in comparing the two is that despite Burress being in jail for two years, he's played in about as many football games during that time as Gonzo has.
11 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No
The first thing he’s going to do is pull a hamy! He’s 34 and been out for 2 yrs. Also his agent is going to demand too much money. You can book it !!!!!!
Short Term/Long Term
Overall I think this is spot on in terms of winning another Super Bowl in Peyton’s last remaining years, but I worry that swapping Burress/Gonzo may hurt in the long run. Although I’m reluctant to call Gonzo injury-prone because I personally don’t feel that the evidence suggests it, I agree that his recent rash of injuries have made me question whether or not it’s the beginning of a trend (I was at the Houston game last year, and that certainly was a freak dirty hit by Pollard). However, Gonzo is still relatively young, and veterans like Reggie (and if signed, Plaxico), don’t have as many potential years left. Gonzo, along with Collie has the best hands of the “younger” receiver set. Yes, both of our sure-hand guys have had recent health problems, but I’d be more worried about losing Gonzo when Collie is still such a question with the concussions.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t we give Gonzo a shot at punt returning sometime in the last season or two? I don’t know if I’d be so quick to call him a non-factor in the special teams game. Regardless, if we were to sign Burress, I’d be happy to give him another shot and give Peyton another weapon. But age/skill/health/motivation must be in tune if Colts brass are going to sign him.
Don't drop Gonzo for Burress
If we could get Burress for the veteran minimum and had unlimited roster spots, I’d say go ahead. But we’d be looking at him as insurance for our fourth receiver spot. Other teams are going to see him as a likely second or even first receiver, and will be willing to pay more for him. And I don’t like the idea of cutting Gonzo to make room for him, which we would probably have to do. Had both played last year, I suspect they’d have been roughly comparable talent-wise. Burress is at an age where receivers tend to slow down and decline. Gonzo should be just reaching his peak. Gonzo’s injury history makes him a risk, but Burress is hardly a sure thing either – he could have lost a few steps due to age or some mental edge and technical skills from being out of football.
But Gonzo has a higher upside due to his age. Plus he’s been working with Peyton and the Colts’ staff at least during the offseason for several years, Burress would have to learn the system and personnel in what will probably be an abreviated training camp.
by ex-Viking fan on Jul 5, 2011 5:50 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I like The idea of keeping Taj as a 6th receiver more.
If Plax was 2 or 3 years younger, I’d have no problem…. It’s just he’s like 35? And hasn’t ran a route in 2 years. I believe yeah he’s tall, but your not too much of a threat deep if your slow. If we wanted another receiver, keep taj because I love his special teams play, and he’s catch or drop like garçon it’s just we’ve mostly seen drops. Practice, even though practice, he puts on a show. And keep gonzo, like sanders, if he’s healthy, he’s “pretty good”
by jshelley1995 on Jul 5, 2011 7:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
headache anyone?!
too old
has not played in two years
will cost a fortune
Will be a cancer in the locker room
will shoot himself or someone else within
Will have tons of problems off the field
Thanks but no thanks! Bring Gonzo back. One reason why I love the Colts is the clas of the organization. Burress is NOT a class act, he’s an overpaid Prima Donnna
by FrenchColtsLover on Jul 5, 2011 11:18 PM EDT reply actions
Why bring in another team's castoff?
… when you can groom the players you want (for very reasonable money) … there are still several solid college free agents that will show-up at Colts’ camp who have special teams value, are deep threats, and won’t be shooting anyone or causing problems in the locker room.
Just because Burress had been productive 3 years ago doesn’t mean he can perform the same as then … besides, for a guy who likes to take guns with him ‘out on the town’ I don’t think Indi has the kind of night life he is looking for …
Yeah....
That Michael Vick experiment didn’t work out too well over in Philadelphia. It’s a good thing the Eagles had groomed McNabb’s successor in Kevin Kolb – I’d hate to see that franchise if he went down.
Hey I am all about Plax getting a second chance and I am sure he has learned his lesson but I dont see him being a good fit in Indy.
My passions are MMA , NFL,Golf and pool landscaping.
by Alexander Daniels on Jul 6, 2011 9:36 AM EDT reply actions

by 

































